Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Pulls Broken XP Update

Cally writes "Yahoo! reports that Microsoft have pulled a Windows XP update from the Windows Update servers after it killed network access for some users of the claimed 600,000 who installed it. (Does this mean only 600,000 XP users trust Windows Update?) The story hints that the problem was something to do with VPN or IPSec drivers clashing with Symantec software - however I haven't found anything about this on the Microsoft KnowledgeBase (the link Yahoo provide goes to the generic support home page.) Anyone got more info?"

14 of 478 comments (clear)

  1. windows update by satanicat · · Score: 5, Funny

    windows mustive been getting too stable. .

    Do they have any sort of quality control?=)

    --
    How Now Brown Cow
    1. Re:windows update by Sazarac · · Score: 5, Funny
      As an IT professional/developer with 130 wintel boxes in my charge, I just want to say thanks to Microsoft for giving me something to fill up the otherwise boring hours of my employment with endless regression testing to make sure everything works with everything else. It's not as if I'm AT ALL busy with keeping everything running anyway. Not to mention writing new code that compiles and runs fine on Win2K but randomly throws exceptions on NT.

      != ("Not!")

      Sheesh... I'm gonna quit my job and start a new thrash band called Rage Against The Butterfly

      --
      This sig is exempt from disclosure under the privacy Act of 1974.
    2. Re:windows update by El · · Score: 4, Funny
      Do they have any sort of quality control?

      Yes, they've got a huge installed user base that reports problems very quickly... why should that pay people to find bugs, when there are 600,000 people willing to pay them for the priviledge of beta-testing their software?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  2. If only they had apt-get by Debian+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am currently porting apt-get to Windows. This will mean that these types of embarassing security breaches never happen again. apt-get is the answer to all of today's problems.

    1. Re:If only they had apt-get by Debian+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny
      I got tired of apt-get blowing up my unstable Debian, so I wrote this to make it transactional:

      Your code looks very interesting, and would make a fine addition to the new Windows version of apt-get which I have almost finished writing. It is crafted in MMX/SSE accelerated x86 assembler, so it runs really fast! You will, however, need to port your nice Java program to assembler. I am also looking for people to help out with the GUI front-end to win-apt-get, which is based around a helpful paper clip character called 'Klecker'. When the user requires an update, they 'Klick' on 'Klecker', and he helpfully tells the user to "Fuck off and read the manual you filthy Windoze luser", or to "Take a fucking number and wait for win-apt-get stable to be released in 2017".

    2. Re:If only they had apt-get by subreality · · Score: 5, Funny
      Hah, you BSD people are so behind the times.

      subreality@underminer:~$ apt-get cure-world-hunger

      Your ports tree can't do that. No wonder BSD is dying.

      :-)

    3. Re:If only they had apt-get by tres · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yeah, but try this with apt-get

      • /home/tres:$ sudo pkg_delete osama_bin_laden-1.2

        pkg_delete: couldn`t entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?)

      oops...
      well then, we have:
      • /home/tres:$ sudo pkg_delete saddam_hussein-1.4_4

        pkg_delete: couldn`t entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?)

      hmm... well we couldn't get those done right, but we can fix some other things:

      • /home/tres:$ cd /usr/ports/us/liberty

        /usr/ports/us/liberty: $ make install clean

        ...

        can't find dependency: bill_of_rights.so

      I know it was there just a little while ago. grr...

      Ha! I know how to fix it!

      • /home/tres:$ sudo portupgrade president-43_b
      Oh yeah! Try that with apt-get :-)

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
  3. Re:Maybe its not on KB because nobody is at work? by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny
    It is 5am in the morning.
    Which is different to 5am in the afternoon ...
  4. In Tomorrow's News by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    A new worm has begun infecting XP systems that didn't install the latest patch. "It's their own fault, they should have kept up to date" said BG.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  5. Re:Before you all complain about auto update... by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    What the hell are you doing !! Get a hold of yourself man and stop trying to point out the facts in this story. Most posters so far have already managed to increase MS's few reported cases to 600,000 broken updates. Let them have their fun.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  6. DRM by Root+Down · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not a bug, it's digital rights management preventing illegal file sharing!

  7. Obligatory Matrix reference by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Funny

    What good is a Knowledge Base article, Mr Anderson? If you're unable to surf?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  8. Re:Automatic Updates by clonebarkins · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is at least the 2nd or 3rd time that I've read a story on /. about a Windows XP/2000 patch that was no good.

    Only 2nd or 3rd? Don't visit /. much, do ya?

    --

    "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand

  9. Re:That's the problem with automatic patching by Helmut+Kool · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Security improvement"? I guess it improves security dramatically if it kills the network access. Thanks, Microsoft!