Nullsoft's Waste: Encrypted, Distributed, Mesh Net
Myriad writes "Nullsoft, makers of the venerable Winamp MP3 player, released today a secure, distributed mesh-like networking protocal and platform called Waste. This v1.0 beta release uses RSA (key based) and Blowfish encryption for security, and features Instant Messanging and group chat, along with file browsing, searching, and transfer. Waste has been released under the GPL, with source and binaries available here."
Didn't they make Gnutella too?
AOL Time Warner (IIRC, owners of the second biggest recording company, not to mention one of the major recording studios) owns Nullsoft, which releases a program that the RIAA and MPAA will undoubtedly call a tool whose sole purpose is to illicitly distribute copyrighted works....
A cliche regarding:
...comes to mind.
Makes you wonder how long it will be until protocols/network designs are attacked on the same basis as the product derived from them. ie p2p/filesharing.
Considering nullsoft, might be a risky move.
Going through the documentation, I found this:
From here
Note: It might be worth implementing WASTE using a subset of SSL, to avoid any concern of flaws in this protocol. Feedback is gladly accepted on any potential weaknesses of the negotiation. We have spent a decent amount of time analyzing this, and although we have found a few things that are not ideal (i.e. if you know public keys from a network, you can sniff some traffic and do an offline dictionary attack on the network name/ID), but overall it seems decent. The current implementation probably needs work, too.
Which suggests to me that it isn't worth rushing out and developing application with *just* yet, until further reviews have occured (and the protocol has matured/evolved).
Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
What's the point? If you can only connect to people who's key you have, and if only people who have your key can connect to you, this is going to be a pretty private thing. If it was more "anonymous", I could see a reason behind it. As it stands, I'll be the only person in my circle of friends who'll "get this", and it'll just spend time wasting on my HD. To be completely honest, crypto on file sharing protocols won't be commonplace until AOL or Yahoo decides to put it in AIM/Pager.
Beleive it or not, but they're not trying to sell it. You only need marketing if you plan on selling it.
Paul Anderson
"I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
what service? I see software, Free software at that with code. Maybe someone got bored at the office?
Because the patent expired.
I don't agree. Everything needs to be marketed. Giving something a name with negative connotations slows acceptance, or may even stop it. They want users don't they?
50 people can share files and even if just one of those 50 has access to files, they all do.
If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
While on the surface, this might seem like a reinvention of IP tunnelling and VPN's, there are a couple of important features bundled in that set it apart:
1. It turns each node into a router. While you can establish a VPN with other tool kits, you still have to enable and configure the routing manually.
2. It's entirely user-land - it's a standalone program that a user can plop on their machine and be on their way.
The best part about it is that you can get through firewalls. The worst part about it is that you can get through firewalls.
Most people are pretty polar in their opinions of firewalls, with most of those people seeing them a fascist mechanism to control what they can see. In some (perhaps most) cases, that can be true. However, firewalls are much more than that: They can (and often are) used to protect YOU, the clueless end-user, from the other bad people on the Internet.
After I clear out counters on firewall rules, it's not uncommon to see 10-20 (sometimes more) incoming attacks within 5 seconds.
So, this will be great for letting people browse the web from work. On the other hand, it will expose them to propagation of worms and attacks which would have otherwise been caught by the firewall.
Is this a good program? Overall, I think that it's a good thing that NullSoft created it. We simply need to realize that with all of the benefits it brings, it will also bring a few negatvies with it.
steve
Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
Yes, it seems to be more of a client where you already have a trusted group of users either from real life (Say, a whole dorm hall or a bunch of co-workers) or from a presence online (Say, a whole gaming guild or software collaborators or even a little message board community) to open some of your system files to. It is a trusted way to get recommended files, be they legal or illegal.
You don't need to be in contact with strangers if all your friends have GBs upon GBs of "shared source".