Slashdot Mirror


Kiro, the Foosball Robot

JasonFleischer writes "Although the official line from the RoboCup competition is that robots should be ready to challenge humans on the soccer field by the year 2050, we don't have to wait that long to see man-machine competition in the bar. Researchers in Germany have developed a table football (foosball, table soccer, whatever) robot. The human challenger(s) take the red team, while the machine works the blue side, using an overhead video camera to see what's happening on the table. The conference paper shows that while the machine generally wins against the normal bar-amatuer it has no chance against a human grandmaster. But these kinds of things are always improving, after all look how big a deal the man-machine chess competition turned out to be. So perhaps the current table football world champions should be watching their backs."

19 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Awful Idea by Bame+Flait · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This will be fun for about ten minutes, until the machine is either impossible, or laughably easy (more likely) to beat.

    People in bars want games they can play socially, with other people. The people who would really be in to something like this would stay home tweaking their Debian installation and picking at their hemorrhoids.

    1. Re:Awful Idea by Hellkitty · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Roger that. One of my biggest hobbies is playing bar games. But you are right - I don't play foosball for the opportunity to beat a machine. I do it because it is something fun to do with friends when you may or may not be intoxicated.

      Chess is a thinking game. The idea of a machine being able to out think or out strategize a human fosters competition, so that's where the excitement in that lies. Foosball is simply hand eye coordination. I have no doubts that a machine will eventually be able to out manuever me in hitting a ball with a little plastic man on a rod. It his hardly the technical coup of a computer beating one of the best chess players in the world.

    2. Re:Awful Idea by ebh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think it would be pretty much impossible to make a tournament-level competitive player this way.

      50FPS is way too slow to react to even a simple three-man push shot. Humans generally can't see the ball when it's done well; they have to build up the skill to Just Know where the ball's going to go. It would be very easy to put some tiny variation into the shot that would completely throw off an AI.

      Plus, the AI only models the field and the playing figures, so it can't respond to poker-style cues a human opponent might give off, like a slight pretensioning of the forearm, that would indicate when the shot would be attempted.

      It would be amazing for practice drills though, both offensive and defensive.

    3. Re:Awful Idea by brendotroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This will be fun for about ten minutes, until the machine is either impossible, or laughably easy (more likely) to beat.

      (sarcasm)
      Right, that's why Golden Tee and a host of other bar - arcade games have been such a failure. (/sarcasm)

      Golden Tee type games offer 2-player/1-at-a-time gameplay and are still hugely popular. This would let you and your mate (the only one who came out to the pub with you that night) to play a rousing game of foosball together against the "computer" at a skill level you chose.

      I'm not saying we're going to see coin-op Kiros anytime soon, but the idea is not so preposterous.

      My $.02

  2. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...someone else to kick my ass at that game.

  3. Bah! by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Until this thing starts talking smack while racking up the goals, I'm not impressed...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  4. What's the World Coming To? by Davak · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is the world coming to when...

    "foosball" and "grandmaster" is used in the same paragraph.

    Of course, I didn't realize that "table football world champions" actually existed either. Isn't that decided by the last drunken game... "And thhhiss is for the cchampionship ooffff thheee wwwwwooorrllldddd."

    Davak

  5. I can't tell from the article... by MeanE · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but does the computer have full control over all the umm (forgive my foosball knowledge) "handles" at all time. I mean part of the game is having to let go and grab the next one. Kind of an unfair advantage if the computer does not have to do so.

    1. Re:I can't tell from the article... by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

      but does the computer have full control over all the umm (forgive my foosball knowledge) "handles" at all time. I mean part of the game is having to let go and grab the next one. Kind of an unfair advantage if the computer does not have to do so.

      Actually, I wanna know if we can still grab onto the far end of our opponents' handles. "Compute this, you metal monstrosity!" :)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  6. Yeah? by superdan2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll be impressed when they have a robot/AI that can play ping-pong. If you look at the plane the ball travels in, foosball is pretty two-dimensional...not entirely, I'll grant you, but I'm making a generalization. If you can create a robot that can deal with three dimensions, and can build strategies to play a good game of ping-pong, then I'll be impressed.

    --
    blog |
  7. Man by mondoterrifico · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact that there is a human grandmaster of foosball somehow makes my life seem less meaningless. :)

  8. No, not in a pub!!!! by POds · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bringing computers into pubs? No, No i tells ya. I work with computers all week. Theres a few things i like doing at the friday happy hour with my work mates. Thats, getting cheap or free beers and playing pool.

    This thing doesnt bellong in a pub. It belongs in a pinball palar... Or whatever you call those things...

    Computers in pubs? pfffffffft... why dont i just start bringing beer to work?

    Actualy, i make a good point, why dont i? :/

    My point is the pub is my one place to ungeekatise myself... bringing a computer to a pub might have the oposite effect.

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
    1. Re:No, not in a pub!!!! by Bull999999 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Computers in pubs? pfffffffft... why dont i just start bringing beer to work?"

      I would not be suprised if they replace the bartenders with robots in the future, and bar sluts with sexbots...

      Hummm Sexbots.....

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  9. Missing the point by tomcio.s · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think everyone so far has missed as to why exactly this is such a big deal.
    It is not important what game the robot mastered. What is important is the fact that the robot is capable of on the fly visual/apendage (arm) coordination.
    That means we have technology that will allow for application of this in other areas (think retrieval robots for disaster zones, etc.)
    That is what makes this story so exciting.

  10. seems simple to me... by trix_e · · Score: 5, Funny

    hmmm... if I were wanting to create the ultimate computer foosball player, I'd just have the machine rotate all the handles at about 12000 rpm, sliding them back and forth at a 100 cycles per second.

    The first time the human opponent catches the ball off the forehead at 1200 fps... FORFIET! The machine wins again.

    but that's just me...

    --
    No man is an island, but Gary is a city in Indiana.
  11. drawing a line in the sand by DailyGrind · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was OK with robots taking away factory work

    I am OK with robots taking away bar games

    But when they start drinking beer on my behalf I draw the line!

    --
    You will have to pry my proprietary software $$$ from my cold dead hands!
  12. It's not supposed to start this way by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think this is the way it's supposed to go. I haven't seen Terminator 3 yet, but I'm pretty sure Skynet doesn't begin with a withering attack on humanity's carefully-crafted illusion that foosball is anything other than spinning the handles as quickly as you can and screaming, "BOOOYAH! IN YOUR FACE!"

  13. No way. by vitaflo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having played foosball my entire life, I doubt they can make something to beat anyone of real skill anytime soon. When you get really good at the game, it's not about seeing the shot to block it, because you rarely see it (if you're good enough) because it's so fast. No, you're going on anticipation, of what the player may do. It becomes a sort of guessing game at that point.

    This is where the stragegy in foosball really comes in. They key is to have a bunch of various shots you can use but that all "look" the same on set up, so the player has no idea where you're going to go with the shot. If they guess wrong, you score. Of course, this takes a lot of skill to do well (and just as much skill on defense to defend).

    Because the robot is using a camera, and because the action is so fast, I can't imagine it stopping a good push shot, or even a good pop or bank shot for that matter. Similarly, I can't see it setting up good shots that a human couldn't pick out everytime. Though I think it would be easier to teach a robot offense, than defense.

  14. It's quite good. by tequesta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've played this thing last February at the Hannover industry fair. I'm by no means a tournament-level player, but I'm not crap either, so I think I can judge this thing's playing power. It's not very good at planning shots (in fact, it's crap at that ;-)), but it's amazingly fast. Better reactions than I have ever seen in a human. And keep in mind, this was a year ago. They use motion prediction to increase the frame rate, so that isn't the limit.

    I do think that they can make a tournament-level player out of this thing. Which isn't the motivation, of course, but give them two or three years.