Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Yoda, Gollum Take MTV Awards

Posted by michael on from the my-precious dept.

zoobaby writes "MTV has given the LoTR franchise credit for spectactular work with Gollum. After being snubbed by the Academy Awards, it is nice to see recognition given to one of the most expressive and best acted roles in recent films."

12 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. KATHLEEN FENT GAVE ME HERPES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    FIRST POST FAGGORTS!!!!11

  2. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Yes, it is very important that we pay our respects to an actor that doesn't really exist.

  3. ITS NOT FUNNY IF YOU HAVE TO EXPLAIN IT, COCKGNOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Begging for modding is also lame, retard. Go back to fellating Scott Lockwood.

  4. While we're on the subject... by methangel · · Score: -1, Troll

    Yoda has a lot more character depth and is simply more impressive than Gollum. Yoda is an ancient Jedi with an entire 'force' behind him that allows him to control his environment. This is why I named my cat Yoda. Gollum is just a greedy ugly troll after his preciousss. Big deal.

    1. Re:While we're on the subject... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Um...I want the name of the person who modded this "Insightful" so that they can be dragged out into the street and shot. That is all.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  5. Another childish juvenile Slashdot story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    It would be a miracle if a whole day went by without a dozen Slashdot stories targeted to the kiddie/teen audience. Michael has the mind of a 12 year old. He must be a fag who sits on his fat ass playing with plastic action figures all day.

    Hey Michael, grow up fag. You are a disgrace to humanity.

  6. Re:A true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    [THE FOLLOWING has been censored for the well-being of geeks]....

    I don't understand? What happened here? Why would it be taken out for my well-being? What the hell were you doing that took SIX hours? Why is the geeks cock big at the end of the story?

    I am curious.

  7. Gollum poorly acted by bap · · Score: 1, Troll
    Unlike the other characters in the LOTR movies, including other CGI ones, Gollum was terrible. He practically chewed the scenery he was overacting so hard. Worse than Kirk! And he did all kinds of physically implausible things, like running full-tilt and being stopped cold by a noose around his neck and just picking himself up off the rock he landed on his head on none the worse for wear. He wasn't even bruised - not a scratch. Not to mention his conspicuously un-broken neck.

    Basically, it was bugs-bunny animation physics.

    In other words: Gollum didn't get a "best supporting actor" nomination because he didn't deserve one: he sucked.

  8. What a great performance by pheared · · Score: 0, Troll

    "...it is nice to see recognition given to one of the most expressive and best acted roles in recent films."

    Fucking nerds.

  9. Give awards to computer-animated charcters? by ikea5 · · Score: -1, Troll

    That's so 1997.

  10. Nah... not so amazing. by digitalmonkey2k1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ok, so its slimy, scrawny, has no social skills and can't stand the light. Sounds more like any old computer geek living in their parents basement than an achievement in CGI. :)

    --
    My sausage tree didn't grow, does that make me a bad mommy?
  11. and... by Debian+Troll+Returns · · Score: 0, Troll

    let's not forget that the entire gollum character was rendered on a cluster of debian boxes.