Slashdot Mirror


BSA Creates Piracy Statistics

JakiChan writes "According to this story on Yahoo! news the BSA commissioned a study that decided that 39% of all business software is pirated, down from 40%. The decline is attributed to the BSA's enforcement techniques. 'The piracy rate was calculated by comparing the researchers' estimates on demand with data on actual software sales.'" In other words, some guys sat in a room and decided that people probably wanted to buy ten copies of software, but only five were sold, so the piracy rate must therefore be 50%. By a similar process we can calculate that 99% of all ocean-front homes are pirated.

78 of 675 comments (clear)

  1. And in other news... by da3dAlus · · Score: 5, Funny

    79% of all statistics are made up on the spot. My math professor always said so, so it must be true.

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    1. Re:And in other news... by bathmatt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, you can use statistics to prove anything that is even remotely true...

    2. Re:And in other news... by McWilde · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow! That's up 13% from last year.

      --
      Maybe
    3. Re:And in other news... by imtheguru · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any statistic not accompanied by a margin of error is worthless, my math professor always said.

      The last US presidential exit polls said the same thing.

      --
      Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
      A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
    4. Re:And in other news... by fredrikj · · Score: 3, Funny

      I see you're trying to increase it further, so I'll counter with some true statistics to bring the number down:

      2/3 of the human body consists of water
      17% of the sides on regular dice are two-eyed
      0% of all prime numbers are even (tricky)

      And finally...
      25% of all statistics provided in this post are false

    5. Re:And in other news... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The human body is 50 - 65% water depending on age and weight. Children's bodies can be as much as 75%. 2/3 = 66.6666666%, so this statistic is incorrect.

      Regular dice have six sides with one through six spots. That means that each regular die (singular for dice) has one side with 2 spots, which is 1 out of 6, or 1/6 or 16.66666666% - not 17% - you were close, but incorrect.

      That's two of the four statistics which works out to 50%, which means your final statistic is also incorrect (it's not 25% of your 'factual' statistics are incorrect) which means that in reality 75% of your statistics are incorrect.

      Thanks for playing, we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    6. Re:And in other news... by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny
      Children's bodies can be as much as 75%.

      Given the number of stops we make on long car trips with my daughter, I'd put that number closer to 99%.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    7. Re:And in other news... by fredrikj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The human body is 50 - 65% water depending on age and weight. Children's bodies can be as much as 75%. 2/3 = 66.6666666%, so this statistic is incorrect.

      Regular dice have six sides with one through six spots. That means that each regular die (singular for dice) has one side with 2 spots, which is 1 out of 6, or 1/6 or 16.66666666% - not 17% - you were close, but incorrect.


      The dice number would've been incorrect if it said 17.0%, but 17% is imprecise enough to imply a range between 16.5% and 17.5%.

      Same thing for 2/3. And no, 2/3 does not automatically indicate infinite precision 0.66666... 2/3 equals base-three 0.2, which is broad enough to cover the whole range of 50-75%.

    8. Re:And in other news... by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Regular dice have six sides with one through six spots. That means that each regular die (singular for dice) has one side with 2 spots, which is 1 out of 6, or 1/6 or 16.66666666% - not 17% - you were close, but incorrect.

      He rounded correctly, just with a lower precision. You on the other hand chose to be more precise, but rounded incorrectly.

    9. Re:And in other news... by Jerf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Better: Infinity, not being a number, cannot divide any other number, so "one divided by infinity" is a meaningless statement.

      Your statement would be better rendered "1 divided by x as x goes to infinity limits to zero." (I'd like to write the actual symbols because I've heard the limit symbol said a couple of different ways; that's my personal preference.)

      If you want to get all mathematical in someone's face, do it right. ;-)

    10. Re:And in other news... by Spunk · · Score: 4, Funny

      The human body is 50 - 65% water depending on age and weight. Children's bodies can be as much as 75%.

      Ergo, children are not human. It all makes sense now.

    11. Re:And in other news... by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey, what are you guys talking about?
      Dice have 5 sides with 2 spots on them...

      Nobody said only 2 spots :)

    12. Re:And in other news... by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      "If you want to get all mathematical in someone's face, do it right. ;-) "

      Indeed. It always pays to study the classics to see how things have been traditionally done. Even the most tired cliche became that way because of its inate broadbased appeal.

      I think you'll discover that if you want to get all mathmatical in someone's face history records that nothing beats a pi.

      KFG

  2. subjective world views and causal myopia by zptdooda · · Score: 4, Informative

    "And for software, because every PC is a software copying machine, since inception we have had a problem."

    He has a point, but it must be strange looking around and having a paradigm of fear/distrust spin on what he sees.

    Reminds me of this saying "If a pickpocket meets a saint, he sees only his pockets".

    The other subjective view is where they attribute the reported 1% decline to their own efforts. Sounds more like either statistical fluctuation or just a noisy unstable way of measuring year to year.

    --
    Esteem isn't a zero sum game
    1. Re:subjective world views and causal myopia by Surak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only with that statement, but the very means they use to 'calcuate' the piracy rate. They're assuming a 39% piracy rate basically because 39% of people who demand (stated that they want to or will buy or who actually buy) software didn't buy a copy. They're assuming that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE is a pirate.

      There's lots of stuff I want that I don't buy. For instance, I really, really want a decked-out 2 processor G4 Macintosh with all the goodies, 4 GB of RAM and 300 GB of Hard Drive space. But I haven't bought one. By their logic, I'm PIRATING that Macintosh right now. ;)

    2. Re:subjective world views and causal myopia by Lordofthestorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Before reading this I would like to say that I am not recommending pirating or know anyone that pirates.

      Having said that,
      The BSA's reviews are misleading for several reasons, but one that I never see mentioned is that pirating actually results in MORE software sales, not less.

      How is this?

      I've 'heard' of the following happening fairly regularly.
      1. Person decides they want to try out a particular piece of software who has no knowledge (high school, hacker, middle age, etc - anyone).

      2. Person sees what software they can get for free over the various channels.

      3. Person downloads several different types of software to try them all out.

      4. Person decides on a favorite.

      5. Person proceeds to use software.

      6. Person decides to use software for a business related function where revenue will be generated or their work checked.

      7. Person buys software.

      Note, in many cases, a lot of software purchases come from people who would not have otherwise had the desire to learn a piece of software (say music creating warez), or the funds to buy a professional piece of software (say windows 2k server, or office etc) but was able to develop the skills to use them. Once they can use them, then it isn't a stretch to purchase the software because you have the skills.

      Pirating, in some cases may deprive software companies of revenue. But in many others pirating actually helps distribute knowledge about the software and increases the computer knowledge of the software in questions.

      One of Microsofts chief marketing advantages is that their software is easily cracked. Why? Because everyone uses it - I would think that most students would especially fall into this category since they can't afford the products or are too young to have the means (high school/junior high) but kids who grow up using Microsoft products will buy microsoft products.

      In fact, if fewer people pirated software, the market for software would be much smaller because fewer people would know how to use the software, and who pays $100 + to buy something they don't know how to use?

    3. Re:subjective world views and causal myopia by ghostlibrary · · Score: 5, Funny

      "And for software, because every PC is a software copying machine, since inception we have had a problem."

      Yes, I'm sure their software sales would be way higher if no one had a PC.

      --
      A.
    4. Re:subjective world views and causal myopia by zptdooda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Woah - thought crime. Lock me up now.

      You're right, I hadn't thought of that. Their method is _so_ nonsensical and immeasurable that it should be disregarded outright. Producing a number out of that process is being disrespectful to numbers.

      --
      Esteem isn't a zero sum game
    5. Re:subjective world views and causal myopia by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Interesting
      it still doesn't justify piracy simply because the software companies know this and if they wanted to make sales based on this approach they could release their programs as shareware.

      No, becasue then they'd lose sales to "honest" people. Also, it costs nothing to distribute or support pirated software -- the pirates do that. And they don't have any erosion of retail price.

      Example, consider developing countries, where close to 100% of software is bootleg (I hate the word "pirate" -- no one is being killed on the high seas, they're copying bits), MS has virtually 100% market penetration. Similarly for other big names, like Adobe Photoshop. No one even considers using cheaper (at retail) software, becasue everything is the same price, about $1/disk.

      A few years later, companies come to depend on MS software, designers on Photoshop, and now the US govt starts to pressure the local govt to crack down on piracy. Within a few years at least half the previous users of bootleg software have gone legit, and are on the upgrade treadmill. Notice that lower priced, even locallly produced software never gets a chance to compete.

  3. What is worse... by icemax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A meaningless statistic or the (Government/Big Business/Your Boss) believing it?

    --


    __________
    Love conquers all... except CANCER
  4. Damn pirates! by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

    By a similar process we can calculate that 99% of all ocean-front homes are pirated Yarrr. There be many a pirate on the high seas.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  5. Did they... by Scalli0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who's smoking crack here? There's no way to calculate how many times I downloaded Bryce off Kazaa or something like that, piracy is un-measurable!

    --
    Sig & Below
    Yuck Fou
    1. Re:Did they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what does 40% even mean?

      A 5-person shop now may buy one copy of MS Word, and make 4 copies because they can't afford 5 full copies. That does NOT mean that MS has lost the sales of 4 copies. It means the company was willing to fork over the cost of one copy of Word for 5 users to use it.

      Now let's assume that software wasn't copyable at all (BSA and Microsoft just had an orgasm), and compliance with licensing agreements was perfect and the computers themeslves magically enforced them 100% accurately. That same company may now very well buy NO copies of MS Word, and go to a cheaper product because the cost of 5 copies of the product is not an acceptable value for the product they get.

      Software piracy isn't like shoplifting a pair of socks. When you steal the socks, the store has lost the property and the sale of that property. When someone copies software who would never in a million years actually buy it, the software company has NOT lost a sale or property.

      Same thing with movies and MP3s... I've downloaded some stuff for free that no way in hell I would have EVER forked over a nickle to buy. If there were no downloads of those items, I would have done without rather than purchased them.

      Yes, some piracy does result in lost sales of product.... but not all of it by a long shot. Is piracy wrong? Of course, but it is a fiction and disinformation for BSA, RIAA, or any other group to suggest that each pirated copy of something represents a lost sale. That is BS that needs to be flushed.

    2. Re:Did they... by notque · · Score: 4, Funny

      Everything is measurable. 92.31% of people say so.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    3. Re:Did they... by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Hear, hear!

      I will readily admit to 'pirating' copies of Bryce (for instance). I am not a graphic artist, nor designer, nor am I ever going to use the software in any way related to my job. I just happen to like playing with rendered landscapes for my own amusement and desktop pictures.
      Did Bryce lose a sale? Nope. I never would have paid for the software, and I never will - particularly not at their multi-hundred dollar price point.

      However, there may be a benefit here - some of my friends, graphic artists, have seen Bryce on my computer and since gone out to buy copies... sales that Bryce would never have seen if these people had not gotten a chance to try the software.

      I'm actually more in favor of free "LE" versions of software - crippleware - with most of the features but not all, enough to be usable as a hobby and give you a chance to learn and like the program and persuade you to buy the full version... or not if you don't need it/can't afford it.

      -T

  6. It has to decrease by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Otherwise the BSA is a worthless entity. Notice that they didn't say it decreased a lot, there's still much more work in the Fight Against Piracy, so please keep funding us, Mr. Gates. Eventually they'll stamp out piracy, honest, so can they please have another 100 million USD?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:It has to decrease by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Notice that they didn't say it decreased a lot, there's still much more work in the Fight Against Piracy, so please keep funding us, Mr. Gates.

      This is the funny part. in the super gigantic corperation I work for/in if such a statistic were real I would see a part of it. over the past 2 years I preformed 2 software audits at random. my first software audit was the first in this state that anyone can remember. and I checked both currentl computers and the closet full of discarded ones that supposedly had "Comapny secrets" on them deemed by some idiot CIO...

      Other than the once in a while violation of winzip being past it's 30 days and no registration key I found almost no software copyright violations. one person had on one of the really old machines a copy of claris works from home. everything else met our licensing.

      So, the BSA IS a worthless entitity... their wild-ass guess... err.. estimate... is so far off they stink. Yes I know that smaller shops probably have a much higher level of copyright violation, but in my time as a freelance consultant to many small machine shops, accounting firms, and Credit Unions I only saw a small amount such as ... same Windows 95 Key used on 2 machines, Office installed on 3 machines from the same CD set... (Mind you these people are STILL running office 97 and are very happy with it.. something that must royally piss off microsoft.)

      that I was able to correct for the owners of the companies for less than $1000.00 (old software is dirt cheap if you know where to buy the used copies..)

      I routenely tell all my clients that if they get a BSA letter, they call ME first their lawyer second and third, throw it in the trash with the rest of the useless junk mail.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:It has to decrease by Technician · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm glad they are using the metric of demand verses sales. On the surface, it looks like hey have reduced piracy by having more people properly buy licenses for all their closed source software. This assumption can be wrong. I feel that properly intertepeted, it clearly shows that with the rise of open source, piracy decreases. Competion which breaks a monopoly does reduce the piracy of a monopolists product. An affordable product that works better does reduce the demand for a high priced alternative. The very real legal risks in the EULA of closed source software are a great reason not to pirate the closed source. OSS products now are low cost and low legal risk. Did sales increase or demand drop? They must be hiding the fact sales did not increase to meet the demand otherwise they would have been proud to report it.

      Let's face it, demand is down for closed source. OSS is a legal alternative to high prices and piracy. Good job BSA convincing us casual copying is bad and helping draw excelent free publicity to the open source movement. It's the best publicity stunt you have done for us. Thank You Very Much!

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  7. RIAA & BSA have something in common by Clay+Mitchell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They like to make up numbers. Same as "one pirated song costs us $X amount of dollars". I wonder how much of that piracy is highly priced productivity tools - Photoshop, Flash, 3DSMax, Visual Studio, etc etc, stuff that people can't really afford, so they are technically losing money, since it wouldn't have been bought in the first place.

    1. Re:RIAA & BSA have something in common by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They like to make up numbers. Same as "one pirated song costs us $X amount of dollars". I wonder how much of that piracy is highly priced productivity tools - Photoshop, Flash, 3DSMax, Visual Studio, etc etc, stuff that people can't really afford, so they are technically losing money, since it wouldn't have been bought in the first place.

      Though I'm guilty of using that argument myself, I only attribute it to my MP3 collection. I just don't have the cash lying around to purchase $5,000 worth of CDs, and right now I don't have the space to store all of them (half the time, the liner notes are more interesting than the CD, but I digress).

      The difference being; I'm not making a product / money off of my MP3 collection. I use it for my personal enjoyment, period. When people download high-end image / video / audio editing applications, there's a good chance that they've got monetary interests. If that's the case, why should they have the right to make money using pirated (not duly paid for) tools?

      I'll grant you it's a case of bad versus worse, but there is a legitimacy to the piracy claims and certainly people making money freely off somebody elses hard work has to be a limit.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:RIAA & BSA have something in common by ponxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Nice try, but the end result is the same: you are using software that you haven't paid for.
      > Whether or not you could have afforded what you have stolen is irrelevant.

      It is in terms of whether it's illegal what you do. Where it is relevant is where companies asses the damage caused by the copying.

      The assumption is that every student who downloads $20 000 worth of software would have boought it otherwise, which is not true. In reality the student would have most likely used free tools (possibly switching to linux in the process) or simly not bothered making that really cool picture where he did that really cool thing ...

      Anyway. point is that it *is* a relevant argument in terms of damage, though not for reasons of legality.

      The difference between illegal copying and stealing is that the only loss in copying is the sale which did not take place, there is no physical loss as there would be if you stole a car...

      Ponxx

    3. Re:RIAA & BSA have something in common by Surak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference being; I'm not making a product / money off of my MP3 collection. I use it for my personal enjoyment, period. When people download high-end image / video / audio editing applications, there's a good chance that they've got monetary interests. If that's the case, why should they have the right to make money using pirated (not duly paid for) tools?

      There are lots of people who *do* use some of those programs for personal enjoyment. Photoshop is one of them -- some serious amateur photographers/desktop publishers want to be able to edit their photos digitally 'just like the pros do.'

      What about people who are pirating the software to learn? I know...ermmm...some people... who pirated professional software development packages when they were younger in order to learn software development to obtain employment skills, and later when he became employed as a developer he PAID for those tools by buying a full copy of the latest version. What about that guy? :)

    4. Re:RIAA & BSA have something in common by ccweigle · · Score: 3, Interesting
      They like to make up numbers. Same as "one pirated song costs us $X amount of dollars". I wonder how much of that piracy is highly priced productivity tools - Photoshop, Flash, 3DSMax, Visual Studio, etc etc, stuff that people can't really afford, so they are technically losing money, since it wouldn't have been bought in the first place.

      Though I'm guilty of using that argument myself, I only attribute it to my MP3 collection. I just don't have the cash lying around to purchase $5,000 worth of CDs, and right now I don't have the space to store all of them (half the time, the liner notes are more interesting than the CD, but I digress).

      The difference being; I'm not making a product / money off of my MP3 collection. I use it for my personal enjoyment, period. When people download high-end image / video / audio editing applications, there's a good chance that they've got monetary interests. If that's the case, why should they have the right to make money using pirated (not duly paid for) tools?

      I'll grant you it's a case of bad versus worse, but there is a legitimacy to the piracy claims and certainly people making money freely off somebody elses hard work has to be a limit.

      That's one point. Here's another, sticking to the high-end software slant ...

      When you pirate high-end software you couldn't afford, that's also one less sale of the low-end clone.

      Say you need some image manipulation software, but you can't afford Photoshop. What if you could have afforded something else, say Paintshop Pro? We all know you can afford Gimp. Pirating a copy of Photoshop you couldn't have afforded anyway hurts noone? No, it hurts lots of people, including the competitors (you could argue it especially hurts the competitors, since you were their target demographic) and the handling/distribution company of their is one.

      Not that it excuses music piracy, but in general there's no "competitor" to that song you like. It's liked for its individuality. I'm leaving sound-a-like bands, covers, remixes, live-albums and such out of the argument. If there's some one particular recoding of a piece you want, it's not that case that you can get the 95% of the full performance you needed most for less by turning to a competing artist.
    5. Re:RIAA & BSA have something in common by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes, someone using a pirated copy who 'wouldn't have purchased it otherwise' is a definite DILUTION OF THE VALUE OF THE PRODUCT which is an offense to the people who created it and their investors. The supply/demand economics of private IP is largely based on EXCLUSION of some people (those who don't pay, just like I can ask the police to remove you from my premises because it is my private property, not a public park).

      No.

      See? I can make unsubtantiated assertions just like you.

      But how about this? Had I not been able to pirate your s/w product Foo, I would not have it to to use, and you would not have my cash. But, if use a "stolen" copy, I may, in the future, decide it is valuable enough to purchase. I will likely speak about your product to friends, who may decide to buy it. And then you'll make some money.

      The issue for anyine selling s/w is not so much whther I do or don't copy it, it's whether I (or anyone else) can or cannot copy it. That's what creates the illusion of scarcity. Sadly for IP selllers, copy prevention is damn hard, and chosing to base a business model on a now next-to-impossible condition is a Bad Idea.

      Comparisons between IP and physical property fail because the notion of exclusive use and scarcity is not a natural condition for IP.

      The supply/demand economics of private IP is largely based on providing value for your money; if you have to rely on artifical exclusion then you're willingly assuming a big risk.

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    6. Re:RIAA & BSA have something in common by maxpublic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The question has nothing to do with morality but with damages. These are two entirely separate issues.

      What the college student has done, in this example, may be immoral or illegal. But given the assumption that the student wouldn't purchase the software whether it was available for copying or not, it is quite reasonable to state that the actual damages to the companies in question amount to - nothing.

      Any fines applied to the student will be punitive in nature, and the proceeds will go to the state for violating the law - not the 'wronged' businesses. Which is as it should be since the businesses suffered no harm.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    7. Re:RIAA & BSA have something in common by maxpublic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The false argument that "I can pirate this because I would not have purchased it" is a rationalization to attempt to justify a crimal act, pure and simple.

      Copyright violation is neither piracy nor theft. It is a civil matter, not a criminal one. If you have a problem with this I'm sure you can either a) change the law to make copyright violation a criminal offense, or b) move to some other country, one where your blather actually makes some sense.

      "Dilution of the value of the product", my ass. Time to take some economics courses, boy.

      Oh, and by the way - *there is no such thing as intellectual property*. It's just another buzzword brought to you by our friends in Corporate America. In fact, according to the Constitution, it's an oxymoron - neither a copyright nor a patent is every treated, in any way, like actual physical property.

      Which should be obvious to you. Stealing your couch is a criminal offense called 'theft'; violating your copyright is a civil matter, one I'll never go to jail for.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    8. Re:RIAA & BSA have something in common by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Copyright violation is neither piracy nor theft. It is a civil matter, not a criminal one."

      For the first 200 years of US Copyright law, you would be correct. I urge you to look carefully at the recent changes, particularly the DMCA of 1998, HR 2281. That law *replaced* and *superseded* the existing copyright law, and fully criminalized things that were either legal before, or else were only civil matters before.

      Since 1998, copyright violation has been a criminal offense, and that's why so many people have been opposed to the DMCA.

      You *can* go to jail for copyright violation. You don't even have to commit copyright violation if the work is in a digital format with any encryption... Merly making a tool to read the content can land you in jail.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  8. Re:fuck you by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    I disagree - my statistics show that only 39% of /. trolls think that *BSD IS DYING, compared with 40% last year, therefore *BSD IS LESS DEAD that it was last year.

    Oh, and for "statistics" read "numbers that I pulled out of my ass

  9. They call that a drop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wouldn't 1% be within the margin of error? Especially since 39% is only an estimate[1]. For all we know, it actually went up 1%.

    [1] The article says: "The study estimates that 39 percent of business software products in use last year were not legally obtained"

  10. According to RIAA maths by stud9920 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ....it's only 12%, but some of the were real big percents.

  11. Point of view by Vengeance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've come to believe that you can learn a lot about a person or organization based upon their treatment of others. If one's mind is a world of sexual perversion, one sees child pornography in the innocent bathtime photos parents take of their kids. If one's mind is a prime example of a money-grubbing, to-hell-with-everyone-else attitude, one sees piracy in every PC.

    In this case, it's apparent that the BSA and it's leaders are rapacious, greedy, amoral takers of other people's goods. They should be put away for their own safety and ours.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  12. Re:Huh? by pkiguruman · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think he means that a lot of people WANT ocean-front homes, but few are SOLD. He's just trying to apply his logic in a wierd way.

  13. More accurate method by dfn5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they did their stats similar to the stats over at distributed.net I think it would be alot more accurate. And it would also spur competition amongst the piraters. I think it would be cool to see who could pirate the most.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  14. As a pirate by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would like to apologise for the heinous crime of software copying. I promise to mend my ways and return to a good pirate lifestyle of murder, rape and pilage on the high seas

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  15. Maybe I'm missing something, but . . . by privacyt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Couldn't piracy also have fallen because of the sharp rise of open source software?

  16. Pirating? by Deflagro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't steal things, I just borrow them from strangers for as long as I need them. The eyepatch is purely for aesthetic reasons....

    --
    Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
  17. Re:Huh? by tuffy · · Score: 5, Informative
    It goes like this: The BSA figures everyone would like an ocean front home. Therefore, it generates a high number of people demanding an ocean front home. But since hardly anyone buys ocean front homes (since they tend to be expensive), the BSA assumes the difference between demanded homes and bought homes are pirated.

    In effect, their piracy statistic is more made-up than most statistics, since they're just making up a number of how much pirated software is out there based on what they *think* would have sold.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  18. Free Software by CaptCanuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What of software that is released in the free software market? Wouldn't increased free software usage also decrease the overall percentage? Oh wait, I'm sure they didn't bother checking free software usage so they can keep piracy percentages at a relatively similar number to before the inception and mass utilization of free software. When someone downloads an average linux distribution, how many packages of free software do they get? That's certainly got to be adding to the numbers and decreasing the overall true number of piracy (i.e. pirated copies of software/all copies of software used). I'm sure they consider the usage of single-license software on more than one machine pirating, so this falls under "all copies of software used".

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
  19. I'm No Scientician Or Anything. . . by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    . . .but it seems to me that in any proper study you make reference to margins of error (which the Yahoo! story didn't mention), and I find it hard to believe that the reported 1% drop falls outside the margin of error.

    This is all really silly.

  20. The truely funny part of this... by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is that US congress will use this kind of stuff to make policies.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  21. Re:Huh? by Alarion · · Score: 3, Informative

    DING DING DING DING DING DING

    Basically "a couple million people WANT an ocean-front house, but only a handfull have been sold." Compared to "hundreds of thousands of people WANT MS OFFICE, but only a hundred copies were sold, so the other copies MUST be pirated just because the people wanted them".

    They don't take into account that they really don't know if those other hundreds of thousands of people actually HAVE a copy of MS OFFICE.

    got it?

    good.

  22. Re:Huh? by Binestar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because the houses are on the Ocean, Pirates have access to them for Pirating. You would think Pirates would like to Pirate all the homes they can, but they can only get to 1 out of every 100 homes to pirate. But because they wanted to get to 99 out of 100 homes, the piracy rate is 99%.

    Excellent logic no?

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
  23. Free software by Phantasmo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would attribute any real decrease in piracy to the fact that many Free software projects "matured" very recently. I walked into a meeting for the NDP riding executive in my area and heard half the room raving about how amazing OpenOffice.org is, and these people are not geeks. The other day AbiWord was raved about in Toronto Computes, a paper that usually focuses on proprietary software (and gives only a nod to Apple).

    Microsoft has just started letting people use Office at home if their employer owns a copy. Free software is ready for business, and MS knows it.

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  24. Re:BSA by evilviper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Read the slashdot title... "BSA Creates Piracy Statistics". No, they didn't gather, collect, or compile them... they "created" them.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  25. What a horrible methodology by TheKodiak · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It overcounts one way: many people do without software that they want - and undercounts another: many people pirate software they don't actually have any interest in. Presumably, they're hoping the two errors will cancel.

    Interesting that they came up with a piracy rate of 95% in Vietnam - given their probable margin of error, it's entirely possible that MORE THAN 100% of software in Vietnam is pirated. People in Vietnam WRITE software, just so they can steal it from THEMSELVES.

    Kudos to the writer of the story, though, for NOT passing along the hugely overinflated "lost profits" number the report obviously included:
    Though piracy rates have decreased, the amount of money lost has risen partly because software prices have gone up, according to the study.
    --
    -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
  26. Normally, I would agree with you.... by Brushfireb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And In this case, you are probably right. However, this is not really a person-specific trait, but rather an organizational culture thing.

    There is a great tendency for organizations to develop a certain mindset (either positive or negative), and then they hire in people that exhibit that mindset in some way, and fire/get rid of those that dont "fit in". In the HR world, its known as hiring "right types", and you can usually determine the companies opinion on this by looking at how they operate.

    Over the course of time, people in the organization start to believe everything that their co-workers and bosses are saying to them, and hence, they develop views in sync with the company/organization. In this case, I would bet that the BSA, since one of its primary goals is to destroy piracy, they only hired in, and then hightened/enhanced this strange, rapacious behavior. I can almost guarantee you, however, that inside the company this is the norm.

  27. Spiralling piracy?!? by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok. Have to remember, in reading future BSA press releases that

    "It is welcoming news to learn that the worldwide software piracy problem has improved significantly..."

    and

    "However, it's critical to recognise that the industry is facing a spiralling Internet piracy problem."

    are not mutually exclusive statements. I wonder if that trick would work in board meetings. "Cost projections have improved significantly" sure sounds a lot better than "Costs are spiralling out of control"!

  28. BSA stats, RIAA stats and SPAM stats by groomed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's largely a matter of who you want to believe. The BSA stats aren't any more inaccurate than the RIAA stats on music piracy, Symantec stats on virus/worm damage, or ISP/pundit stats on the cost of spam.

    For a group of people eager to believe that the "spam plague" allegedly costs us all billions, it is more than a bit hypocritical to summarily dismiss whatever numbers the BSA or the RIAA come up with.

    It's all a matter of what you love to hate. When you're decided on that, the numbers will follow.

  29. Re:let's get it out of the way, right now! by notque · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, 100% of statistics are worthless, but 21.53% of all statistics are made up.

    Side note.

    Adding a decimal point increases the truth of any statistic. 82.34% of people say so.

    --
    http://use.perl.org
  30. Acronyms by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least we now know what the "BS" stands for in "BSA".

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  31. Decrease from 40% to 39% - I'm Sorry! by Picass0 · · Score: 5, Funny


    I guess I was slacking last year. I'll do my best to get that back up to 41% next year. I PROMISE!

  32. BSA doing us a favour by BenjyD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The increasingly powerul anti-piracy measures being taken (BSA 'military-strike style' audits, WinXP activation etc.) can only be a good thing for Free software, surely? By increasing the effective cost of using non-free software, they make free software more attractive.

    The only useful purpose the BSA serve is to provide silly stories like this to make me laugh on a dull mid-week afternoon. Thanks!

  33. Defeating the statistic by sporty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok. Some facts.

    1. The economy is/was in a downturn.
    2. BIG corps can more easily afford to ride this out.
    3. BIG corps usually can afford licensing of software etc etc...

    Now, assuming a lot of tiny tiny companies haven't sprouted that would pirate software, wouldn't it be somewhat obvious that software piracy would be down?

    Just playing devil's advocate.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  34. Laughable by Bazzargh · · Score: 5, Informative

    the actual white paper is here

    It starts from the premise of looking at software industry growth rates from 1996 to 2001 and predicting that even without piracy reduction, the growth of the software industry would be *greater* (in percentage terms) from 2002 to 2006.

    Obviously after the bubble burst the IDC guys spent the last of their stock earnings on crack.

  35. BSA? by djeaux · · Score: 5, Funny
    Well, I opened my s-mail this morning & had my annual pledge card from the Boy Scouts of America. Then I open Slashdot & see that the BSA is conducting a study of software piracy. Talk about cognitive dissonance!

    Must be all those 12-17 yr old boys working on their computer merit badges...

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  36. Wait, what? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before the BSA starts talking about hijacking stuff, perhaps they need to talk to these people about infringing on names.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  37. Mod parent down!! by dipipanone · · Score: 3, Funny

    ASCII ribbon campaign for peace

    Peace ribbon?

    You can't fool me -- this is clearly yet another goatse.cx troll, only rendered in ascii.

    Years of repeated slashdot exposure mean that today I'd recognize that savaged sphincter anywhere -- even if it is hiding in a couple of ascii characters.

  38. Here's a tip by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay BSA, here's a tip:

    When the fruit of your efforts is less than the margin of error, it's time to rethink your strategy.

  39. Well, by this we can... by FroMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We can assume by this that the BSA will be disolved in 39 years. Its really not a bad business plan for the lawyers, in 39 years most will be retired by then with nice hefty stacks of cash. They just have to say each year that they are being successful by 1% and that way the group corporations will keep paying them. When they finally get 39 years from now they'll be rich and really haven't done anything.

    Or put another way in more slashdot terms:

    1. Get corporations to pay lawyers to do stuff.
    2. Lawyers harass legitimate purchasers of software.
    3. Lawyers claim 1% success a year.
    4. ??? (loop back to #2)
    5. Profit! (and retire when no more %'s to go)

    Now isn't that cynical.

    In reality I'd say software piracy is a problem. I don't know how many times here I've seen folks claim that they pirate software because its so darn expensive. Well, sometimes there is a reason that software is expensive, it takes time and money to do right. Then folks will say that software is buggy and not done right so they shouldn't have to pay for it. Well, don't use it! Novel idea huh? It sickens me how often folks think that deserve stuff without paying for it.

    Its really a simple idea folks. If you are unwilling to pay the price for something, you don't get to have it. It doesn't matter if you don't like the rules, they are the rules.

    Which brings me to another point. OSS or free software. Use it if you don't want to pay for commercial software. No one is forcing you to use commercial software. Simpley owning a computer does not give you the right to use commercial software without paying for it. However, there are a lot of folks out there that write software that you can use for free. Use that.

    Whining that your favorite game only runs on a certain platform isn't an excuse to pirate the software. There are many emulators, use those if you absolutely need to run the software. Otherwise tell the company that you want a version that runs on your platform.

    Quit whining that life gets hard when you have to use OpenOffice.org to read word files and it isn't perfect. You look like a fool when you whine that something isn't up to your standards because its buggy so you won't pay for it then use it anyways.

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  40. Re:How is this interesting? by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 3, Funny

    Enterprise class?

    Oh god - holodeck accidents, Time travel incidents, and the Borg are in YOUR future!

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  41. ObSimpsonsQuote by mrjive · · Score: 5, Funny

    Homer: Aw, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. Forfty percent of all people know that!

    --
    If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
  42. Re:Good idea? Bad idea? by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the way they come up with their numbers is taking the number of new computers sold each year, guessing how many are for the workplace, assuming every work computer uses Windows and Office and a ratio of how many use whatever other packages (Photoshop et.al) and how many are for professional homes, assuming all the home users use Windows and guessing from the home users what percentage uses Office ... then comparing that number to the number of sold licenses of Windows, Office, and whatever.

    If Intel and AMD combined sell 100 million CPUs this year and Microsoft only sells 60 million seats of Windows, then 40 million computers are using pirated OS. Same sort of thing with Office, etc...

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  43. WTF? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As everyone is well aware, the full extents of piracy can only be estimated. Since these estimates are based on extrapolation of real data, there is fair reason to believe that estimates made by informed individuals could and should reflect some notion of reality, but because they are extrapolations, they must be accepted as potentially being off by an unknown amount. Although we can reasonably assume that any unknown variance is extremely unlikely to be substantial, it is supposed to still be understood it is equally likely to not be entirely insignificant either.

    The bottom line is that these guys are claiming to have discerned a 1% drop in an area of the piracy chart that must inherently be extrapolated from real world data. Given that even the interpolated statistics based on the real world data would already have a margin of error of more than 1%, there's no F-ing way that you can discern a 1% variance in data they haven't even measured.

    How convenient that the first two letters of the association's acronym are BS.

  44. Conspiracy hats on everyone by MalachiConstant · · Score: 3, Funny

    With these methodologies you have to wonder...

    Here's some conspiracy thoughts:

    Somewhere deep in the bowels of BSA headquarters there's a group of people who have this all planned out.

    BSA Drone #1: Okay, first year we'll say piracy dropped a small amount thanks to our efforts. This will convince the companies and congress that our efforts are successful, but we need more help.

    BSA Drone #2: Right, then during year 2 we'll get some more laws passed and get people used to more extrememe copy pretection.

    BSA Drone #1: Right! They bought into the XP activation, now we can roll out the next step.

    BSA Drone #2: Which is...?

    BSA Drone #1: Tying activation to a bank account! It's the only way to be sure they're not pirates! Then when we have that in place we'll report a drop of 5% and complain loudly about OSS making it impossible to do audits.

    BSA Drone #2: So stage 3 is requiring all government and big business customers to go 100% closed source. Brilliant!

    BSA Drone #1: Let's get a taco.

  45. Re:Piracy and cultural values about "theft" by pyrotic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bought a copy of Windows 2000 Server in Palestine for about $2 last month. The guy in the computer shop told me that before the intifada, people did buy legit copies of MS software. (Unemployment is now 90% in some areas due to curfews, and priorities are not what they used to be.) Theft as such is surprisingly rare in such a messed up place. People really look out for eachother.

    Software piracy is seen not as theft but more as sharing. It's scary how little OSS software gets used. Occasionally you'll see a foreign NGO introduce it, or some of the people who study CS in university will know about it. A lot of the ISP infrastructure runs OSS. Running traceroute is always an experience. There ought to be an ICMP flag for "soldiers have cut off the power supply". Trying to enforce liscensing in Palestine would require a functioning police force, judicary and government, none of which actually exist. So people just copy.

  46. Of course they make it up! by The+Spoonman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They have to, since they don't actually go after larger businesses, only the tiny, five-or-six-person mom and pop shops.

    When I was unfairly let go from my previous employer, I decided to hit 'em hard by contacting the BSA. As I was the Network Manager, I could tell them about pretty much every piece of pirated software, and I did. I went to the BSA site and filled out a report documenting hundreds of missing licenses for MS Office, MS Exchange, a number of Adobe products, and a few from Macromedia (all of their big vendor companies). I even documented how Lotus SmartSuite is installed on about 300 computers, yet we only had 4 legal copies, not to mention all the small shareware-type shit (like SnagIt and WinZip) that was installed on almost every PC without one legal license in the place.

    I documented the "plan" we had in case of audit...it seems you can refuse them entry the first time they drop by for a visit, but they come back later that day with sherrifs and a warrant to force the issue. More than enough time for use to ghost a pirated-clean image on all the machines (using a pirated copy of ghost, of course). We even went to the trouble to compile a list of every machine that had pirated software so we could quicly decide which ones would need ghosting first.

    Finally, I documented the little utility one of the members of the IT staff was forced to write ("it's written, or you're out of a job") to bypass the licensing restrictions of MS Terminal Services. I even gave them a link to the company's website where they could download it (it was up there so the salesmen could get it at home).

    And, what happened? Nothing. For three months I called every week to see what the status was, and was told each time that there was nothing new to report. It was in the hands of the member companies. Finally, I was told that one of the member companies had decided not to pursue.

    When I asked why, I was told they didn't have a reason, but it could be because: "the member company may already be investigating or negotiating with the company, the company may have some kind of site license, or the member company may have some other kind of relationship with the company in question." None of these were the case (I still have contacts in the IT department).

    No, the truth is, the BSA simply can't walk into a large company and tell 500 people to get off their machines for a day while they're audited. It's logistically impossible. So, they advertise lots and lots of threats, send out "truce" notices, and make a lot of people worry about nothing.

    --
    Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
    http://www.workorspoon.com
  47. Re:Good idea? Bad idea? by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am pretty sure that is how they do it. I have seen statistics from them showing how there are 1.68 new computers sold each year for every copy of (Windows or Office, take your pick) and if you do a little magic math (1/1.68 = .595) you see a 59.5% legitimate purchase rate, or almost exactly the 40% piracy rate they claim.

    OSS, Linux, StarOffice or whatever, and folks that retire a machine and migrate the software they paid to use all skew that number ... but hey, there are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics.

    It would be a pretty easy way to boil up numbers for 3rd world countries, just figure out how many computers get sent there in a given year, figure out how many copies of legit software get purchased, simmer on high for 5 minutes and Voila! cooked books.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  48. My two cents... by stonewolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I got laid off so I got a business license and started trying to make a little money on the side. (Any one want a Mexican Samuri Sword?)

    About a week after I got my license I got a nasty letter from the BSA. It made a lot of threats. Said that they had the right to inspect my place of business (my home) and gave be a "chance" to get all my software license up to date before they came to tear my compters apart.

    My reaction was fairly normal. I ignored them. A couple of weeks later I got another nasty letter. This time I made sure my door locks were solid. I made sure I could find my ammunition and guns in the dark. And, I took every bit of software that I had from BSA members and threw it out. I am now 100% pure open source software.

    After reading through a couple of BSA letters and discussing them with a lawyer it becomes obvious that most small business can't afford to *own* software made by BSA members. The legal liability for missplacing a software license is greater than the value of the business. Misplace a license, lose your house, your savings, your kids college fund, your ability to buy perscription drugs...

    Stonewolf