Slashdot Mirror


Will Microsoft Subsidize WinXP For Lindows Buyers?

kinema writes "Ars Technica has an interesting little article about Microsoft's alleged "dumping" of Windows XP. It seems that Microsoft is selling XP through TigerDirect for only US$50 to customers who have purchased a Lindows computer." Note that Tiger says nothing like this on their site (No, you can't buy WinXP for $50 there); Lindows CEO Michael Robertson says (in the linked column) that "Microsoft's latest offers to TigerDirect are extremely lucrative and I wouldn't be surprised if they ultimately cave to Microsoft's pocketbook." PR ploy or reality, you decide.

16 of 644 comments (clear)

  1. Why by Cackmobile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you had bought a Lindows system, why would you wanna buy XP. You've obviously made a choice not to buy windows.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    1. Re:Why by twstdr00t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because if the decision was based mostly on price, $50 looks a lot better then $200.

      --

      ---------
      AlmostFreeLinux.com
    2. Re:Why by llamalicious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...and then you use it, can't communicate effectively or share files 100% with the rest of your family, see a cheap way to get that "Windows thing my sister, brother, aunt and uncle have" and say, hmm, only $50...

      Not trolling, I'm dead serious. If one of my less technically inclined siblings bought a Lindows machine from Wal*Mart, you can be sure after a few days or weeks of using it for emailing stuff back and forth (excel, word, ppt, whatever) with the other family members, they be begging to get Windows on their computer (Why can I open this CoolStuff.ppt on my computer??.) Ok, in fairness, they wouldn't necessarily be begging for Windows, per se, but they'd be begging to be able to have a working solution. Just for the numerous kids educational titles out there they'd get it.

      Please, don't start in with the run it on Wine shit either, unless your going to provide free on-site tech support to resolve library and native vs. Wine dll issues on each piece of software they have.

      Yes, I do know I reference MS Office file types up there, which cost far more than the discounted $50 XP. I'm over-generalizing just to make a point. IMO Lindows is great, for someone who *knows* they want to get away from Microsoft, or want to get started in Linux without starting up a distro from a Floppy, network install or CD and figuring it all out. But not for any typical home user I know...

      Now, to my actual point:
      Yes, I've used a Lindows machine a family member bought on a whim; it's no longer running Lindows. You better believe they didn't know it didn't have Windows. Lindows/Windows... it's all the same... right??? He didn't have a clue what he was getting. None. I'll be a good chunk of all the Lindows machine buying folks don't know either.

      Ahhh... well, that's my big rant for the day, time for some coffee to calm me down.

      Agree/disagree...? I wanna hear about it.

    3. Re:Why by TheMidget · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If you'r buying a Lindows box with the intention of runing XP, you either already own XP or plan to pirate it.

      Or you read that with a Lindows box, you can get XP for $50 rather than $200. Assuming that Lindows costs less than $150, this is an extremely good deal! Looks like a good way to get Windows users to try out Linux ;-)

    4. Re:Why by Quantum+Skyline · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agree wholeheartedly.

      The average user doesn't know the difference between Windows/Lindows, except the fact that there is no Word, Excel, Outlook (Express), etc yet. No one's heard of WordPerfect. Barely anyone I know uses Netscape. I would have to explain why Kazaa doesn't work...and they don't care about alternatives - its Kazaa or bust. Can't run MSN Messenger? Screw it. Even if Sim or Everybuddy or GAIM is better.

      Most people who are buying a computer that cheap are buying it because it is that cheap. They don't care what's on it as long as it runs the games it needs without any extra work. I try to educate users about licensing, but explain to a 12 year old like I did this weekend the concept of copyright and licensing. It goes right over their heads. And since parents probably know less than their kids about computers, parents will ask "Is this what you want?", get an affirmative, and pull out the Visa.

      Kids get to play their games, parents get rid of another headache.

    5. Re:Why by mgv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Excuse me, if you want to open Words, Excel, etc, you can use Open Office. It works fine for me.

      Then you haven't tried to put motion video into your talks. I do alot of talks, and they have alot of video's in them - 1 second repeating loops to be precise, for technical reasons. But the problem applies for any video. (I have actually though of reencoding some of this stuff as an animated gif, which would be a really ugly solution ....)

      Open office doesn't do video, or other fancy includes. It doesn't do the macros for excel right.

      That doesn't make it bad, but it does make it less than 100% compatible.

      I'm not here to troll on this one, but if open office could do my talks, I would be doing them all on a linux laptop now. But it doesn't, and any amount of people on ./ saying open office does everything isn't going to make it so. Sure, it works for you. It is getting close to better than word for doing wordprocessing. It isn't that close on excel, nor powerpoint. We won't even talk about porting over access databases ....

      As soon as OO does this stuff reliably, I'm switching over. Until then, I _HAVE_ to use microsoft for this part of my work, and windows stays on my laptops, even with a room full of linux servers & workstations at home.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
  2. True or not, does it really matter? by Machine9 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Even if it's true (something which is far from impossible considering microsoft's attitude towards the competition), does it really matter?

    I mean, do we *really* want Lindows to be the thing the masses at large associate with linux, or alternative OSes in general?

  3. Hooked on Crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like the friendly neighborhood drug dealer, Bill says, "Here, have this first taste on me..."

    1. Re:Hooked on Crack by eniu!uine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why do people always insist on insulting drug dealers by comparing them to Microsoft. Drug dealers offer real products with real choice.

  4. Well, now. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    Maybe we should pool our resources so we can offer a cheap version of Linux to people who buy systems with Windows XP!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  5. Why is Microsoft so bad? by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 5, Funny

    This product called Linux is offered for FREE for users of Windows.
    Now that, my friends, is price dumping.

  6. TigerDirect Microsoft Survey by 2cb · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently bought a bare bones, no-OS system from tigerdirect. I later received a survey from them via email that was a thinly veiled survey direct from Microsoft. They offered an $80 gift certificate off the purchase of XP if you filled it out. I filled it out anyway. It basically asked what OS you use, how many computers you have, what word processing program you use, and why (i.e. price, performance, features, etc.)

  7. ars has good discussion on this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For several days, the Ars crowd has been discussing this. The discussion is worth reading through

  8. Re:look by helix400 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I submitted this story 2 days back. 2003-06-08 15:11:43 Microsoft wooing TigerDirect with cheaper software (articles,microsoft)-(rejected)

    Heh, same here...I've have 2 articles rejected. Although the editors may have reasons for rejecting articles, Slashdot really needs a better way to handle rejection. You find a great story, research it for authenticity or dupes, then find alternate links, and finally write up a paragraph with good HTML and perfect grammer. After all this, you recieve this notice:

    ....(articles, microsoft)-(rejected)
    "..don't gripe, you'll get you modded down..."

    Another example of Slashdot editor's lack of professionalism. They need to tell us why was it rejected. Not catchy enough? Someone already submitted it? Not /. worthy? It really pisses you off when you put all that work in, only to receive the harsh words "rejected" without any reason given.

    Slashdot should have a section titled "rejected stories". It'd contain all the rejected stories submitted to the editors that day. I'd love to see those! Sure, some will suck and some will be dupes, but there's all those rare gems of stories we'll never get to see.

  9. I got this from the lindows mailing list by manifest37 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is what Micheal had to say about microsoft paying off TigerDirect:

    After my expose piece on Microsoft last week, I promised one reader that I wouldn't write about Microsoft again for awhile. Unfortunately, I think I have to break my promise and here's why: As I've written about previously, the real key to desktop Linux gaining momentum is to get retailers to sell computers with Linux preinstalled. Sure, some people are smart enough to download software from our web servers then burn a CD and install it, but the majority of people want to buy a computer, plug it in and have it ready to go. Getting Linux computers onto store shelves sounds easy -- what store wouldn't want to stock computers for $200-300? (I just bought a computer for $249 and upgraded the RAM from 128MBs to 256MBs for 30 bucks and it is a solid little performer!) Consumers really want affordable computers and any retailer who stocks them sells large quantities of them. It seems like it would be an easy decision, right?

    There's one additional dynamic that comes into the equation - Microsoft's money to discourage retailers who start selling large numbers of LindowsOS computers. Microsoft routinely offers financial inducements to computer companies to not carry LindowsOS computers. With $40 billion in the bank, it's an easy decision for them to use a few million dollars to block Lindows.com from major retailers. Every month that Microsoft keeps their monopoly position, it is another billion or so in profit. You've probably heard rumors of such behavior in the past and maybe you're skeptical because the tales are, not surprisingly, light on facts. So allow me to give you the facts from one such retailer to convince you.

    LindowsOS computers have been available from TigerDirect, a popular mail order technology business, run by a savvy CEO, Gilbert Fiorentino. After selling thousands of LindowsOS computers in the last few months, TigerDirect describes their experience with LindowsOS in their most recent catalog, saying they have found it to be "faster, leaner, and more stable than Microsoft Windows," mentioning how "...LindowsOS never crashed, even in extreme testing situations," and then go on to say that they are "more enthusiastic about the LindowsOS than ever."

    We've met with TigerDirect in the past and they've remarked what great sellers the LindowsOS computers have been for them and how they were surprised at the demand for Microsoft alternatives. However, at these same meetings, they talked to us about e-mails and phone calls from Microsoft attempting to bribe them to stop selling LindowsOS computers.

    While TigerDirect has resisted Microsoft's pressures in the past, recently Microsoft has stepped up orders to their staffers to increase the financial incentives to impede LindowsOS sales at TigerDirect. At some point, Microsoft's monetary inducements become so large that it makes economic sense for just about any retailer to abandon LindowsOS - no matter how many computers they might be selling. TigerDirect is in the business to make a profit and if Microsoft will guarantee them a profit, nobody can begrudge them for taking it.

    Microsoft's latest offers to TigerDirect are extremely lucrative and I wouldn't be surprised if they ultimately cave to Microsoft's pocketbook. Microsoft is giving TigerDirect unheard of discounts on Microsoft software, allowing them to sell Microsoft Windows XP for just $50 to all of their customers who have purchased LindowsOS computers. TigerDirect is paying less for some copies of Microsoft Windows XP than even the largest Microsoft customers like Dell. Besides radically discounting their software, Microsoft is agreeing to spend a lot of marketing dollars to advertise their products through TigerDirect and more specifically to past LindowsOS computer buyers. Additionally, Microsoft is paying TigerDirect to collect market research on Li

  10. Re:look by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Another example of Slashdot editor's lack of professionalism. They need to tell us why was it rejected. Not catchy enough? Someone already submitted it? Not /. worthy? It really pisses you off when you put all that work in, only to receive the harsh words "rejected" without any reason given.

    The silly thing is that if they do this, then the quality of submissions will eventually go up because people will start to understand what makes a good submission. I'm sure that 20% of the Slashdot crowd submit 80% of the articles anyway.

    Slashdot should have a section titled "rejected stories". It'd contain all the rejected stories submitted to the editors that day. I'd love to see those! Sure, some will suck and some will be dupes, but there's all those rare gems of stories we'll never get to see.

    Agreed! This means that you get a different view on the stuff being posted - not just what the Slashdot editors like and dislike. Also, if it had the reason why it was rejected - you can understand what makes a good submission and so the quality of submissions will go up.

    Finally, something I put in sourceforge idea tracker was that they should only show the "Submit" button when you've previewed at least once. This will force people to preview, close any open tags and generally think a little more about their comment. It also serves to piss off slightly more the "First Post!" trolls.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.