Slashdot Mirror


Investigating Angular Velocity

mbreitba writes "Sam Barros is at it again, Some may know him for his Railgun research, and some may know him for his homemade cannons. But now he's found a use for all those old CD's you don't need anymore. Personally, I couldn't think of a better use for them."

66 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. they've been lying to us by gfody · · Score: 5, Funny

    52x isn't the max its 172x!
    I don't care if the cd could come out of my burner fly across the room and explode into a billion pieces, I wanna 172x burner!

    seriously though, why do they only try to spin the cd faster. why not spin the laser in the opposite direction the cd is spinning in?

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
    1. Re:they've been lying to us by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about multiple lasers, each reading/writing simultaneously?

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    2. Re:they've been lying to us by gfody · · Score: 3, Interesting

      if they bounced the laser off a tiny mirror couldn't you use a stationary laser and just spin the mirror? I know nothing about making cd burners but it seems like instead of trying to think outside the box and workaround the physical limitations of spinning a cd they just all decided to make 48x the standard max and give up!

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    3. Re:they've been lying to us by BJH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Already been done. The first 52X CD-ROM drives (from Kenwood, as I recall) used multiple read heads to get 52X equivalent speed.

    4. Re:they've been lying to us by bn557 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      well, the task would then be to retrieve the bounced laser image. it's non trivial to have a sensor at every spot that the laser could bounce on. also, it'd have to dynamically change the focal length on the fly in order to prevent jitter.

      P

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    5. Re:they've been lying to us by inaeldi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      why not spin the laser in the opposite direction the cd is spinning in

      Too expensive, and for what? Is a CD burned in 3 minutes not fast enough for you? Would you be willing to pay 4x as much to burn a CD in only 1.5 minutes?

    6. Re:they've been lying to us by gfody · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is a CD burned in 3 minutes not fast enough for you?

      hell no its not fast enough.. if I wanted to make a backup of my cd collection at 3 minutes a disc it would take me a week! I dont know about paying 4x as much for 1.4 minutes but let the market decide that one.. don't decide 3 minutes should be fast enough for everybody. If there was a burner that could burn a cd in 5 seconds I'm sure there are plenty of people willing to pay a premium for it

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    7. Re:they've been lying to us by kinnell · · Score: 2, Funny
      seriously though, why do they only try to spin the cd faster. why not spin the laser in the opposite direction the cd is spinning in?

      You mean something like this?

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    8. Re:they've been lying to us by qqtortqq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Make the whole computer spin, and leave the cd stationary.

    9. Re:they've been lying to us by inaeldi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So just buy another CD burner and burn 2 CDs at once. If you want to go really heavy duty, get a rack of 8 SCSI burners or something. It'd probably still be cheaper and more economical than a spinning laser that has to automatically re-focus every microsecond (or whatever).

    10. Re:they've been lying to us by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can't actually read or write at 48x speed anyway, except with a perfectly flawless disc (no tiny, near-invisible scratches, absolutely centered and balanced, no thickness or density variations) anyway. And if you could, the data rate would be starting to push the limit of what IDE can do (or indeed SCSI).

    11. Re:they've been lying to us by gfody · · Score: 2, Interesting

      why so content on waiting 3 minutes for a cd to burn? do you use a 486 cpu that takes 3 minutes to start your aol too? is it not cost-effective to upgrade to a faster cpu, you would rather have two 486's each take 3 minutes to load 2 aols?

      seriously, sometimes you can split the task into parallel tasks and use multiple units to scale horizontally but in the end it still takes 3 minutes to burn a cd! 3 minutes is a long time when your in a hurry. also, if it takes a scsi tower with 32 burners at 48x to burn 1000 cds in a day theres going to be a cutoff where its more cost effective to use one super expensive fast burner.

      making a faster burner is not a bad thing, dont argue for the sake or arguing. how would you feel if intel and amd decided 3ghz is the limit deal with it?

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    12. Re:they've been lying to us by inaeldi · · Score: 2, Informative
      If they could figure out a way to burn CDs faster and at the same time do it cost effectively, then that'd be fine. Your parallel to CPUs is faulty. CPUs are not limited by a physical impossibility (that we've reached yet anyways). Making a faster CD burner isn't just a matter of finding ways to cram more and more transisitors in.

      ...I don't use AOL.

    13. Re:they've been lying to us by gfody · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ok, since your feeble mind can't seem to come up with a situation where the actual burn speed IS the bottleneck of the entire making-a-cd task.

      I have a .iso on my desktop that I want to burn.

      I want to make more than one copy of a cd.. maybe I want to make 100 copies?

      I want to just fill a cd with some files off my computer and I dont feel like waiting.

      Have you ever tried copying 650 MB worth of data from one hard drive to another? This itself will probably take a few minutes.
      we're not all using eide fujitsus

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    14. Re:they've been lying to us by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, no, no; then your computer will be unusable while you use the CD. Instead leave the cd stationary but make the rest of the universe spin. The computer will still be spinning, of course, but since you'll be spinning too, you can still get your work done.

    15. Re:they've been lying to us by emilng · · Score: 2, Funny


      I think you would do it sort of like the prime number shitting bear.

    16. Re:they've been lying to us by darqchild · · Score: 2, Insightful

      currently the laser passes through a series of lesnses to focus the beam correctly, and the incident ray has no problem returning to it's point of origin through the same set of lenses

      if you design a network of spinning mirrors, there shouldn't be a problem, because the light can still travel back through the set of mirrors back to the sensor which is located next to the laser

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
  2. yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Copyright © 2002 by Sam Barros. All rights reserved. Removing any material from this site for display without consent from its author consists in an infringement of international copyright laws and can result in fines up to $50000 per infringement, plus legal costs. So ASK ME before you remove anything from here.

    Oops, if anybody visited the site and it was all blank, sorry, that was me after I removed his content! I'll put it right back.

    I love reading all the different ways people threaten in their copyright notices.

    But wasn't a better version of this concept posted here like last year? A guy put the CD in a real high-speed, high-torque moter (not a dremel) and watched it shatter on the spindle.

    This guy is just spinning them fast on a dremel tool and watching them shatter when they hit the ceiling, not quite as impressive!

  3. Already been investigated.. by DeathOverlord3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    turns out most cds explode at 28k rpm according to this story from a couple years back. and even then it was a dupe.

  4. Either do that... by stere0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... or put 'em in the microwave for a couple of seconds, shiny side up. Put a sheet of paper below if you don't want to stain the glass plate.

    --
    Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
  5. mirror by Barbarian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a full copy of that page, with the videos, but no way am I mirroring when the author of the page threatens to sue for $50000 at the bottom.

    1. Re:mirror by Anime_Fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      For us mere mortals, not even that is possible... He seems to be slashdotted already...

      But according to this (another slashdot comment), you have violated his notice (removing any material), if you were planning on displaying it (doesn't say anything about public showing), so I GUESS YOU'RE SCREWED (or not):
      Copyright © 2002 by Sam Barros. All rights reserved. Removing any material from this site for display without consent from its author consists in an infringement of international copyright laws and can result in fines up to $50000 per infringement, plus legal costs. So ASK ME before you remove anything from here.

      *Goes check the http://www.thedarkcitadel.com/cd/ mirror that someone else kindly posted*

  6. why spin the CD at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I bet in the future, you'll be able to get "legacy" CD-ROM drives that just take an optical image of the whole disk once, load the content into a buffer, then eject the disk, in about 5 seconds.

    That would be cooler than 12,983x drives.

    1. Re:why spin the CD at all by BJH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I seem to recall some company made something similar to this - a CD-ROM drive with a built-in hard drive, where the content of the CD was cached on the HDD to allow quicker access.

      This would have been quite a while ago. Anybody else remember these?

    2. Re:why spin the CD at all by JeffSh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This article from CNN makes mention of such a thing coming from Sony.


      The range also features a CD audio system in which a disc can be placed anywhere on a playing surface the size of a salad plate.


      sounds incredibly cool! but it's part of Sony's megathousand dollar line of products in development. Im not sure what it is or how it works, or even if its close to the idea. This is the only place ive ever seen mention of this thing.

      sounds pretty cool though!
    3. Re:why spin the CD at all by anshil · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well I doubt the wavelength the scanner uses matches the CD. Note that there aren't any real black pits on the CD. Only a reflective layer, and a semi reflective layer with a distance of exactly lambda/4. Now when the laser in a classical cd player "looks" at the cd where the semi reflective layer has a "pit" it gets reflected as whole on the reflective layer. If there is not a pit, half of the light gets reflected, half passes through gets reflected on the second layer, goes back and gosh it interferes destructive with the light that got reflected on the first layer. Thats why wave length and distance between the layers need to match each other.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    4. Re:why spin the CD at all by anshil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly! Thats the technical explanation.

      The explanation with scattering pits, and focus are for the masses who do not know what destructive interefence is :o)

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    5. Re:why spin the CD at all by untaken_name · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I seem to recall some company made something similar to this - a CD-ROM drive with a built-in hard drive, where the content of the CD was cached on the HDD to allow quicker access.

      This would have been quite a while ago. Anybody else remember these?


      Yes. I used to work in a small computer store. These 'wonders' were also sold w/o their own hard drive, as 100x cd-readers.
      What they did is spend about 10 minutes staging when you put a new cd in, making an image of it on the hard drive, but telling your PC that the image was the cd-rom drive. Sure, it was very fast, once you got past that initial insanely long wait time (that happened *every time* you inserted a different cd...)
      It was such a scam that you had to read the back of the box *very* carefully to figure out what they were doing. We got so many restock fees from those things (although I tried to *tell* people....they'd buy it anyway...i mean, it said 100x! that had to be better than the 8x that was sitting next to it....right?)

  7. Whooopie by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whoopie, another story for Power Labs. What's their slogan again ? "We know just enough science to wreck something, then we call it an experiment."

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    1. Re:Whooopie by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whoopie, another story for Power Labs. What's their slogan again ? "We know just enough science to wreck something, then we call it an experiment."

      If that's the case, we're doing a damn impressive experiment on their web server. Yee-haw!

      Cheers,
      IT

      --

      Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

  8. AOL by Zelph · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dang! Where are all those AOL CDs when I actually WANT them?

    1. Re:AOL by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 2, Funny
      Where are all those AOL CDs when I actually WANT them?

      Probably you've sent them to http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/.
      BTW: If I read the article that says aCD Rom is a bomb ready to explode I really wonder if we can sue AOL for deploying weapons of mass destruction. *eg*

    2. Re:AOL by Booyakka+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Check your local US Post Office - mine has a AOL disc display.

      --
      This is where I keep my clever quotes "" Yup I only got a pair, so I better not waste em!
    3. Re:AOL by PhxBlue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dang! Where are all those AOL CDs when I actually WANT them?

      Right here.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  9. Freeze the CD... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the site:

    A standard compact disk has a diameter of 12cm. If this disk is to spin at 35000RPM, the peripheral velocity at the edges of the disk (.377m circumference x 583.3 turns per second) will near 220m/s, or 722fps, or 792km/h or 492miles per hour. That is one fast CD-Rom!

    At those speeds the CD is storing over 150joules of energy.


    I wonder if Freezing the CD would make for even more spectacular explosions... after all the speed and energy stored in the CD is really ridiculous.

    Freezing usually makes most things more fragile, right?

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Freeze the CD... by bn557 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How temperature affects the properties of a material are intrinsic to the material. Examples: Water becomes more rigid when you freeze it. Silly Puddy becomes hard when you freeze it. But with plastics, yes they generally lose their ability to bend without breaking. It raises their resistance to change, which raises the stress in the material at a given amount of bending. That leads to it breaking.

      P

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    2. Re:Freeze the CD... by kuiken · · Score: 2, Informative

      and the winner of the 'pedantic of the year' award is ...

      --

      42
    3. Re:Freeze the CD... by apdt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, that should be "pedant of the year"

      Do I win it now?...

      --
      I lay awake last night wondering where the sun had gone, then it dawned on me.
  10. Jackass for geeks by shaneb11716 · · Score: 5, Funny

    'nuff said.

    -Shane

    --
    I love teh int4rw3b!!!!!111one1
  11. Pointed Out Already by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a dupe of thiswhich was a dupe, funny that. Here is a mirror of it (the first dupe), since the site was taken down: My Mirror

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  12. Hmm... by rgoer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Guess I should call Big Broth^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Ashcroft at T.I.P.S. to let them know that AOL has apparently been engaging in some very suspect "terrorist-like" activity, filling my mailbox with potentially dangerous explosives for years.

  13. How do we know how fast it was spinning? by anubi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    He notes using a dremel tool to spin the disk.

    He also notes the disk speed is lowered due to aerodynamic drag.

    Personally, I would have been impressed if he had done something to the disk, maybe going over quarters of it with a black felt pen so an optical pickup could have determined its RPM, instead of guessing.

    At those speeds, gyroscopic effects can really be exaggerated! Gyroscopic effects alone can result in some really bizarre behaviour when the plane of rotation is changed.

    This experiment reminds me the time we got a flywheel spinning off the table-saw motor in high school shop. The flywheel got away from us when unexpected gyro forces wrenched it from our hands. The damage that thing did was talked about from then on to beyond the day I graduated.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    1. Re:How do we know how fast it was spinning? by bm_luethke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed on the dremel.

      I have a few spare Radio Control car electric motors that have TONS or torque. I bet I can get the CD to spin at nearly thier top speed which is somewhere between 25k-40k depending on the motor. I've broken wooden airplane propellers on them trying to build thing before.

      You can get some of them pretty cheap (25-40 dollars for the motor, 15-25 for a mechanical speed control). Lots of uses for a high torque, high RPM, motor.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  14. While watching the movie... by Flounder · · Score: 4, Funny
    was just waiting for a perfect example of why you should always wear eye protection when doing something extremely dangerous at extremely high speeds.

    You'll shoot your eye out!

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  15. Other good uses for CDs by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few years ago, myself and a friend found another, equally interesting use for old CDs:

    You can use a stack of them hooked up together as a big high-voltage capacitor!

    We connected them all up, then passed in ~20K volts, and it really could hold it's charge (I can't remember the numbers - since then, I've lived in amsterdam for 3 years, and a'dam tends to have a negative effect on ones memory....). What was amazing was when you hooked it up to the powersource, all the disks were attracted to each other and clamped up really tight.

    Discharging the thing was amazing, and the 'zap' (for want of a better word) could easily burn through some thick paper...

    Maybe when I've got some time I'll repeat the setup, this time with some photos, then I'll enjoy a good ol' fashioned slashdotting...

    --
    tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
  16. Full Text... poor server... by SJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you ever loaded a faulty CD into a high speed (30X or higher) CD-ROM player, heard it spin up to incredible speeds, rattling and whining, and thought to yourself: "this thing is going to explode"? When CDs came out they were heralded as the solution for the need for high storage-high speed information devices, transferring data at a whopping 150kb/s, but like all technologies, 1x CD players quickly became obsolete as the need for higher and higher transfer rates pushed for faster players, and, with them, higher rotational speeds. As we advance into the 21st century CD players are reaching the ultimate speed limit: we are getting to the point where the CD player simply can not spin the CD any faster or else the CD will literally fly apart. On the interests of the advancement of high speed computing PowerLabs brings to you:

    THE ULTIMATE CD SPEED LIMIT!
    WARNING: This page is written for amusement only: These experiments are VERY hazardous!; A high speed rotating CD Rom is a bomb ready to explode and will send razor sharp plastic shrapnel in all directions when least expected. DO not attempt to replicate any of the experiments described below!

    Setup:

    Before an experiment could be devised where a CD would be rotated to complete failure, a proper motor had to be obtained that would be capable of achieving those high rotational velocities with the load presented by a CD. Although a CD is very light and aerodynamic, when it starts to spin at a couple tens of thousandths of rotations per minute the drag created by air around its surface can be to slow the motor down considerably. High torque motors are very common and cheap, as are small high speed motors. Unfortunately however, high speed, high torque motors are a much rarer and expensive find.

    My choice was to use a Dremel tool as the motor. It was cheap, easily available, and, more importantly, the rated 35000RPM spindle speed meant that it had some real potential for spinning things to destruction.

    At 35000RPM very small imperfections and balancing errors can lead to extreme vibration; so much, in fact, that it would be possible to damage the bearings or bend the axle on the tool if something as heavy as a CD was to start wobbling (bear in mind that the Dremel tool was designed for very small, light weight loads and even then many of its attachments carry warnings not to be used at full speed). One of the first challenges of the research was to find a means to secure the CD perfectly in the middle of the tool. A custom made CNC lathe spun aluminum holder was considered but before I ever left the room I realized that the cylindrical sanding attachments Dremel makes not only fit a CD hole perfectly, but also have adjustable width so that the CD could be gripped in place. With the CD in place and the dremel plugged in, it was time for the fun to begin!

    The Dremel was switched on and the rotational velocity was gradually increased to its maximum, at which point the CD hummed and whined in a very menacing manner. Mildly disappointed that it had not exploded, I realized that it wanted out; a quick jerk at the tool and the CD slid out of the holder and contacted the carpet whilst spinning at ungodly speeds. It peeled out a bit in front of me and proceeded to make its way to the door at a very high speed. On contacting the closed door, the CD did a most unexpected thing: it first bounced back a few inches, and then, when it hit the door again, it jumped straight up the door and struck the ceiling, exploding into thousands of fragments which rained down on the entire room. This first experiment was unfortunately not videoed, but it served to get everyone in the room to put glasses on and cower away behind pieces of furniture, whilst people in the hall corridor quickly made their way to my door to ask what was going on. Now, with an audience, the camera was taken out and the real experimentation began...
    ÂA standard compact disk has a diameter of 12cm. If this disk is to spin at 35000RPM, th

  17. This guy is going to get pissed by Playboy3k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last time this happened his site was slashdotted and consquently due to bandwith caps wasnt up till 3 weeks later. Wait till he finds that he has been put on the front page again. Better start looking behind our back's for some guy with a dremel and a couple of AOL cd's.

    --
    I'm a geek deal wit it
  18. This picture is priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This picture is great. The guy is sitting on the floor looking at a 35000 RPM CD which is most certainly going to explode, and wearing nothing but a pair of (what looks to be) sunglasses! He looks like a little kid whose found his first book of matches and is mesmerized by fire! I can't view the video (./'d) so I can't comment of his actual procedure, but from the looks of things he could have been in for a world of hurt. At 35000 RPM, that plastic might as well be concrete, or glass.

    1. Re:This picture is priceless by ptr2void · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Definitely. Why are these guys wearing sunglasses? To look cool probably. The protection effect against high-velocity CD fragments is negligible. Still, it might help against secondary hits, which bounce off walls. The primary shrapnel goes off radially, so you can control it pretty good.

      Anyway, these people seem to have too much time on their hands :-)

  19. From the blog of Sam Barros... by ites · · Score: 4, Funny
    Tuesday, 5am.

    I keep having these dreams about things exploding. Tonight it was my microwave. I filled it with AOL CD's, set it to 'Aggressive Defrost', and sat down with a beer. The explosion took off the roof of my house and sent it into space. This dream gave me another great idea I can't wait to try: sending cargo into space by blowing up AOL CDs.

    Wednesday, 7pm.

    It did not work. The neighbour wants back his microwave, and my son is asking me where his music collection went to. Well, that's one positive angle, anyhow.

    Thursday, 5am.

    That dream again. My subconscious is trying to tell me something. Maybe I was using the wrong brand of microwave...

    Friday, 8pm.

    I think I've cracked it. Instead of just one microwave, you have to imagine a Beowulf cluster of the things...

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  20. Page counter by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at the counter on the guy's page : it has only 4 digits. How much do you bet it already rolled over a hundred times ?

    I can just picture the guy in trance mumbling "no, no, I'm not slashdotted, my server isn't smoking, it can't be, I only have 4000 hits so far ..."

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  21. To drive cats insane... by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hang one from the ceiling with a string near a window. It will reflect the sun in to a fairly bright spot somewhere on the floor or wall, give it a little spin. Your cat will chase it as if it's some kind of small rodent but of course never be able to catch it. This may work with exceptionally stupid dogs too. Laser pointers work just as well but require more user interaction.

  22. Here's the MPEG by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny
    For those who can't get the MPEG video from the site:

    0000000 0000 ba01 0021 0001 8001 5d16 0000 bb01
    0000020 0c00 1680 055d ffe1 e0e0 c02e 20c0 0000
    0000040 be01 dc07 ff0f ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
    0000060 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
    *
    0004000 0000 ba01 0021 0a01 8031 5d16 0000 e001
    0004020 f307 2e60 0031 9601 1107 0100 917e 0000
    0004040 b301 0014 c4f0 ffff b8e0 0000 b801 0880
    0004060 4000 0000 0001 0f00 f8ff 0000 0101 f96b
    0004100 19ee 4cc7 5b59 835a f211 55fe 3761 f1f4
    0004120 5c46 bd6b 9624 0f52 6aed 4c33 6ecd d3fa
    0004140 4ad5 78f5 93b2 72db 5375 c5c0 e386 3f6b
    0004160 9225 8e50 ef2c 8677 86f9 7fa4 71b5 2357
    0004200 9c55 19ac 9fb3 5ddc 1878 cc1c dc3a 8f37
    0004220 0df2 bb48 8d4e b6cc 114a efd9 03a0 ca1d
    0004240 4ae8 1003 ef91 59bf d78e 0911 d2e4 9190
    0004260 608b 6caf 2903 721f 4b90 232f 9d6f 5277
    0004300 1143 a8c7 ce5d 8c80 f4da 9824 db82 3ff4
    0004320 15b1 56d2 7f64 eb83 bc9c d007 84aa f912
    0004340 38c3 b97e f6d1 4fdb edef 2fb9 faac 90d0
    0004360 ae25 4b5f 8f14 bff1 e970 f751 dfb9 ad0e
    0004400 fbb8 b2ed e179 ea84 56d2 5004 155c 8d78
    ...more of the same

  23. Re:Zero RPM by anshil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Will not function likely with a standard scanner since the wavelength do not match, just have explained that.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=67125&thresh ol d=0&commentsort=3&tid=137&mode=thread&pid=6168826# 6169070

    --

    --
    Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
  24. Not possible to move laser? by Albinoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You sir, are an expert troll.

    Hmmmmm..... after a minute of thinking. Lasers, among many things can be aimed at very very high speed (ever been to one of those laser light shows?) How about a lens or mirror that spins and a laser that merely utilizes that mirror or lens by aiming at it?

    Please people, if youre gonna troll or just make asinine, narrow-minded comments, at least log in so we can list you as "foe".

  25. Newbies by Vihai · · Score: 3, Funny

    I did it more than one year ago with a friend of mine, we actually managed to put the disc on the floor spinning at 15K RPM and making it run across the office at high speed for 50+ meters.

    We used a pencil to push the disc away from the dremel, if we had to force it for more than a fraction of seconds, the pencil would smoke :)

    At the highest speed the disc exploded (well... it was already damaged, we almost knew it would) and some SMALL piece is still stuck in the roof...

    Don't do this at home!

    (do it at the office :))

  26. This stinks...(a bit offtopic but reply to parent) by anubi · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you microwave a CD, not only do you get an impressive fireworks display...

    You will also get a lot of really smelly fumes from the ignition.

    I have no idea of the toxicity of these fumes, but I can tell you your pizza will taste funny the next time you use the microwave oven to prepare it.

    So, if you wanna experiment, do it in someone else's oven.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  27. St Anger by MixMiesterT · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I know what to do with that new metallica cd. *shudders* damn that saint anger

  28. Re:Other uses for AOL CDs by oshy · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I reemed out the hole that wide, there would be no CD left

  29. Re:sell it as art by untaken_name · · Score: 2, Funny

    (And I like how the "DO" is capitalized instead of the "not")

    Maybe he was imagining R. Lee Ermey saying it...

    DO not attempt to replicate any of the experiments below, maggot! YOU WILL not live another day if you do, do you understand me? I CAN'T HEAR YOU!

  30. Arguing for the sake of arguing... by lenski · · Score: 5, Informative
    Heelloo, This is *slashdot*! Arguing for the sake of arguing is "our" stock-in-trade! :-)

    Unable to resist...

    Ye olde "9 pregnant women having a baby in 1 month" argument... For another analogue that may apply here, it's worth noting that recent developments in semiconductor processing technology includes a move to 30cm wafers, specifically to accommodate parallelism in production.

    I don't remember the dates specifically, but silicon production "began" with 3-inch wafers, then transitioned to 5-inch, then 8-inch. So, don't be too harsh on those who suggest doing things in parallel.

    Producing 1000 CDs per day? Consider standard pressing techniques, which is nearly as flexible as "burning" CDs but way cheaper and can be performed as quickly as you wish. (Did you know that CD sputtering chambers can contain multiple different blanks?)

  31. Got chased by one... by PSaltyDS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Had one come out and chase me around the lab a bit. An HP VL 400 low profile desktop with a quirk in the CD drive that if you pushed the eject button more than once, it stored the button actions. Pushing it twice quickly resulted in it opening about one centimeter and then closing again. Pushing it three times while the disk was spining full speed caused the tray to open without waiting for spin-down! The disk got air born (only for about half a meter) and skittered across the table after me as I back peddaled away from it in surprise.

    The first time it surprised me, the next ten times, I did it on purpose! (Screwed that NT 4 WS disk up pretty well, IIRC).

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  32. Wrong. by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 2

    That's something else entirely, which you would've known if you compared the URLs.

  33. Re:CD's as weapons by Asprin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do the 1045-Hours-Free CDs do more damage than the older 720-Hours-Free CDs?

    ...

    ....because, you know, it might be time for an upgrade.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  34. Re:CD's by Abm0raz · · Score: 2, Informative

    The secret to carving CDs is to go slow and insure the rigidity of the CD.I find that by using contact cement and gluing a piece of 1/8" plywood to the BOTTOM of the CD, I can use a band saw on a CD quite well. The wood prevents the CD from bending, which will cause it to catch and crack/shatter or chip. I've also found grinding wheels to work well, too ... but the same thing, you need to attach something rigid to prevent the CD from bending. I find plexiglass to work well, too.

    -Ab

    --
    Nothing fails quite like prayer.
  35. He got the velocity calc wrong... by sexylicious · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not circumference times the rotational velocity. It's the RADIUS times the rotational velocity.

    So, for the standard CD thats: .06 m x 583.3 rotations / second (using his numbers) = 34.998 m/s = 114.8 fps = 78.3 mph.

    If it really was going 220 m/s, that's a significant fraction of the speed of sound at sea level (340 m/s).