...you already enjoy economy of scale, you already enjoy legal tax elusion, you already enjoy near-monopoly lock-in mechanisms, you DO NOT deserve any further preferential treatment. Are the small business who deserve preferential treatment.
This is not a crazy conspiracy theory because it is at all reasonable that authorities would do their best to have access to such data.
Other conspiracy theories are crazy because they are based on unreasonable hypothesis and only deluded people would believe them (all of them, probably).
Of course, it you're one of those you will not be able to see the difference. That's part of the problem.
The failure mode of SSD may be very gentle, like seeing an increase in correctable block errors until they become uncorrectable block errors. You only have to hope the controller's firmware is not buggy and does not crash hardly.
You missed the part where you are comparing nominal power output and ignoring that a nuclear power plant outputs its nominal power for 95% of the time while solar for 5%.
The high cost is a myth. A nuclear reactor produces so much energy in its life that the decommissioning costs are only a small fraction of the kWh sold on the market. Do you want to double the reserve? Fine, it would still be economically valid.
That said, the "usability" of the land is a moot point. How "usable" is the land of a hydroelectric basin that is permanently made unusable *by design* ?
To me it does mean that we should invest more to replace old reactors and replace them with newer models which are not subject to the same kind of failure with those consequences. Better yet we have to invest on LFTRs.
It solar there is subsidized the way it is in Italy they will keep producing because they will get paid a lot even if the market value of energy is zero.
I don't know about Scotland but hydroelectric is so much effective that usually is saturated already and it's not part of the debate about how to generate THE REST of the energy.
Such glider with probably fly around 60 kt (IAS) with at 90.000 feet would be 168 kt (TAS), not supersonic at all. The only aerodynamic issue is resistance to flutter which has been accounted for.
Slashdot Mirror
...like this would be the bad outcome of this law....
That has also be tested and no evidence has been found.
Do you prefer $50 to vote for who I tell you or a bullet in the knee of your daughter?
Without any accident investigation (and they are usually though) an analysys two crashes in six months are just a coincidence.
Your speculations are worthless.
...you already enjoy economy of scale, you already enjoy legal tax elusion, you already enjoy near-monopoly lock-in mechanisms, you DO NOT deserve any further preferential treatment. Are the small business who deserve preferential treatment.
This is not a crazy conspiracy theory because it is at all reasonable that authorities would do their best to have access to such data.
Other conspiracy theories are crazy because they are based on unreasonable hypothesis and only deluded people would believe them (all of them, probably).
Of course, it you're one of those you will not be able to see the difference. That's part of the problem.
The failure mode of SSD may be very gentle, like seeing an increase in correctable block errors until they become uncorrectable block errors. You only have to hope the controller's firmware is not buggy and does not crash hardly.
You missed the part where you are comparing nominal power output and ignoring that a nuclear power plant outputs its nominal power for 95% of the time while solar for 5%.
New and improved breakage!
Doesn't look so bad anymore eh?
Underscores are not valid in hostnames but are totally legitimate in DNS labels. SRV records come to mind.
...among anti-vaxxers :)
The high cost is a myth. A nuclear reactor produces so much energy in its life that the decommissioning costs are only a small fraction of the kWh sold on the market. Do you want to double the reserve? Fine, it would still be economically valid.
That said, the "usability" of the land is a moot point. How "usable" is the land of a hydroelectric basin that is permanently made unusable *by design* ?
To me it does mean that we should invest more to replace old reactors and replace them with newer models which are not subject to the same kind of failure with those consequences. Better yet we have to invest on LFTRs.
It solar there is subsidized the way it is in Italy they will keep producing because they will get paid a lot even if the market value of energy is zero.
Actually, thermodynamics tells that ALL the energy is not renewable... entropy and stuff...
I don't know about Scotland but hydroelectric is so much effective that usually is saturated already and it's not part of the debate about how to generate THE REST of the energy.
Nope, wave flying in a glider is always smooth. Entering in a wave at 850 km/h may not be.
Such glider with probably fly around 60 kt (IAS) with at 90.000 feet would be 168 kt (TAS), not supersonic at all. The only aerodynamic issue is resistance to flutter which has been accounted for.
I fly gliders in Europe and we use metric on gliders. Very convenient indeed :)
Agreed. It will be renamed to Sybian.
Or, better yet, a scary-looking antenna connected to a fake device with an on-off button
A Thorium molten salt reactor would be able to produce Pu-238 without any considerable proliferation risk.
Oh god I'm full of nucleotides!!!
The new gTLDs are a monstruosity under any technical viewpoint. So it seems fair someone abuses them.