Slashdot Mirror


A Model End Vendor License Agreement

Teese writes "Low End Mac is presenting this article as a humor piece, but its vision of an End Vendor License Agreement seems to be pretty well thought out, and one that I wouldn't mind seeing in the real world."

51 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. EVLA by Durin_Deathless · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Kinda has a ring to it, but is this practical? I don't see anything like this ever working, but maybe vendors could change the way their EULAs are written.

    --
    You should use AdiumX on your Mac.
    1. Re:EVLA by peacefinder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Practicality or enforceability is not yet the point, I think. It clearly is absurd, and should not be considered an enforceable contract... which reflects the absurdity of a click-through EULA.

      It seems to me that a click-through EULA is rationally (but probably not legally) equivalent to or weaker than an EVLA delivered to the manufacturer by certified mail, or initialled by a software dealer's employee. It's a sweet idea for a protest at least.

      Furthermore, when we purchase software under a EULA, we allow a company to dictate terms to us, often terms that are onerous or not obvious. We wouldn't accept these entanglements when buying a book, a house, a car, or groceries. Why should we accept them here? For that matter, why shouldn't we have more say in the contract negotiations than "Yes or No"?

      We are citizens, after all, not just consumers.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  2. Yeah... by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, the vendors have to agree to be bound by an agreement?

    BUAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!

    Pardon me...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  3. Text mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Redundant

    End Vendor License Agreement

    Please read the following and click on I AGREE before accepting my payment for your product.

    It is the policy of the LOW END MAC USER GROUP that purchases made by members of the GROUP will only be made if the vendor of the DESIRED PRODUCT agrees to sign and approve the END VENDOR LICENSE AGREEMENT (EVLA), which you are now reading. This EVLA stipulates the following:

    1. You (THE VENDOR, heretofore referred to as YOU) cannot sell my name, address, phone number, email address, social security number, model number, serial number, hair color, eye color, weight, height, or any other distinguishing characteristic without specific written permission not obtained through the use of a USER INTERFACE. Permission must be written, signed in ink, no facsimile allowed.
    2. You cannot call my home, mail my home, or send email to my email address without my express permission. You must assume, by default, that permission is NOT given at registration.
    3. All registration questions for your product must be written in the same format, so when choosing NO for one answer, NO is the default response for all answers.
    4. Anything I make with my own computer is my property, and you cannot use if in any form.
    5. Any software I install on my computer is my business, and you cannot collect information about the internal contents of my hard drive after I purchase your product.
    6. You cannot require me to register a product more than once.
    7. All ongoing, recurring registration expenses must be clearly explained at purchase, or I will not pay them. This includes fees for services such as .mac and .NET. You must, however, continue to provide the services.
    8. If I tell you that I do not want to register once, once should be enough. Do not ask me again. By clicking on AGREE, you agree never to ask me anything more than once.
    9. If I attempt to quit a piece of software, YOU must make sure it does not ask me to verify that command more than once.
    10. You must NEVER delete critical posts from your user bulletin boards. You may, however, clump them together.

    [AGREE] [WE DONT WANT YOUR BUSINESS]

    Violation of any of these conditions indicates your permission for me to stop payment on your product without returning same product, no questions asked.

    1. Re:Text mirror by gfody · · Score: 5, Interesting

      11. If I uninstall a piece of software, the uninstall program must NOT require the original install disk.
      12. When installing your software you MUST NOT put shortcuts for AOL, Real Player, or Gator on my task tray, quick launch toolbar, start menu, desktop or startup folder.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    2. Re:Text mirror by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      13. If a "full install" of the software is performed, the installation media will NOT be required to run said software.

  4. yes!!! by hobobeaver · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would so like that to be seen in the real world. I remember playing Nexus TK back in the day and the EULA was evil, basically said they could kill your account for no reason. Also, my yahoo junk account that I give out to websites when i sign up for stuff yesterday had zero bulk messages, today it had 62. I would kill to have this be real cause I dont want spam and I want to get back at evil compaines.

    --
    wtfsig?!11
  5. Vendor License Agreement to Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the Redmond, WA Garbage Dump: You agree that upon receiving my payment of $199.99 for xp, you will give full control over my computer to me. You agree not to force upgrades, backdoors, or internet explorer at me. You also agree that if my privacy or Fair Use Rights are violated in any way, shape, or form, I have the right to repeal my $199.99 and keep the software at no cost. Bill, please sign below: __________________________

  6. #7 by dirvish · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I agree with most of them but this one seems unreasonable:
    All ongoing, recurring registration expenses must be clearly explained at purchase, or I will not pay them. This includes fees for services such as .mac and .NET. You must, however, continue to provide the services.
    Services change all the time. You can't expect a business to be able to look into the future, their business model may have to change in order to stay successful.
    1. Re:#7 by steveit_is · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can and do expect that I will not have the terms of service changed on me after they have been agreed to by both myself and the other party.

      If one is selling a service for a length of time, then one had better be damn sure that they can provide THAT service for THAT length of time for THAT price.

      It is especially wrong when a corporation after having offered certain terms tries to change those terms by changing the EULA one must accept to apply a patch to a 'buggy' system that should never have been unleashed on the consumer in the first place. (winBlows service packs spring to mind )

      I guess my point is, screw their business model... I demand that promises(contracts) be kept!

    2. Re:#7 by El+Cubano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Services change all the time. You can't expect a business to be able to look into the future, their business model may have to change in order to stay successful.

      You are only halfway correct. They may not be able to look into the future, but they sure as heck better know what is going at present. For example, you purchase software X and it depends on your ability to access a MS .NET server on which part of the app will reside (a subscription service that you must pay for). That had better be spelled out on the FRONT of the box, or it will piss off many customers.

      Think of it this way: You buy a new car. After 5,000 miles, the check engine light comes on. You go to the dealer and they say, "Oh yeah. by the way you need to bring in your car every 5,000 miles for as long as you have it and we'll reset that light for you for $500. By the way, if you let it stay on, the car shuts off after 100 more miles." That is the sort of thing that line item is trying to avoid.

      Now, if the business model or pricing changes, then they can notify the users and go at it from there, but the user should not buy something of which they are not aware (the requirement to subscribe to a service).

    3. Re:#7 by leshert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm guessing you don't have a credit card, or if you do, you haven't read the little flyer they send you (printed in the ever-popular Flyspeck 3-point typeface).

      Most credit card agreements state the same thing: by using the card, you agree that they can change the terms at any time. Your recourse is to cancel the card. I've done that once before.

    4. Re:#7 by Bryan+K.+Feir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most credit card agreements state the same thing: by using the card, you agree that they can change the terms at any time. Your recourse is to cancel the card. I've done that once before.

      Two differences I can think of, though:

      First, the credit card companies (or, usually, the bank that issued the credit card) generally give you advance notice of any changes. You can sometimes find an insert in with your bill describing the changes that will happen next month.

      Second, credit card companies aren't a monopoly, as much as most of them would like to be.

      -- Bryan Feir

    5. Re:#7 by BrynM · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hey, what you said makes me wonder if I'm re-accepting the old agreement when I re-install and how the "retro-activeness" of an old click-wrap license would work. Has anyone ever spotted a clause that you are accepting the agreement in it's revised form, not even in your posession (even worse for someone without internet access)?

      You might be saying that the revised agreements would supercede the old no matter when it's accepted, but that can't be applied to both a first time installer and a repeat installer. AYAL anyone?

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  7. EVLA and EULA by r0xah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not only is this a pretty neat idea that would be great for the consumer, but how nice would it also be to have a EULA that was about the same length? I don't know many people who can actually read an entire Microsoft EULA without going insane. Many good books are shorter than a Mircrosoft EULA.

    --
    those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -isaac asimov
    1. Re:EVLA and EULA by s20451 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Remember the Borland EULA? It was about a paragraph long and basically said that you had to use the software "like a book", i.e., you couldn't use it in two places at the same time. That was one of the most friendly corporate EULAs I've ever seen.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:EVLA and EULA by Bagheera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "Like a book" license has appeared in other places too. As I remember, Poser has the same thing - though it's a bit longer. Personally, I like the concept. Under that license I can install a piece of software on several machines that I use at different locations (Home, laptop, possibly work) and be able to use it without violating any sort of EULA.

      The concept of an End Vendors agreement is wonderful, but a little impractical. Though it -might- be plausable to have a hard copy version that you use when you buy something that states "If the EULA in this piece of software is untennable, you agree to refund my money on the prompt return of the software." That would effectively get around the "You can't read the EULA until you open it, but we won't take it back if you open it."

      One can only hope, right?

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  8. Reminds me of the MapThis EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the legal disclaimer leaves a bad taste in your mouth, you might prefer this one: (can you find the new ones from last time? Read carefully, and don't drink anything at the same time) DISCLAIMER (I MEAN IT): This program and documentation reflects the thoughts, opinions, ideas, and body odor of myself; it does not reflect the thoughts, opinions, ideas, and/or body odor of my company, my friends, my wife, my daughter, my fish, my roses, my dog, or my trash. All rights reserved, all lefts reserved. This software is subject to change without notice. Bits are slightly enlarged to show detail. Any resemblance to actual software, running or hung, is unintentional and purely coincidental. Employees and their families are not eligible. Beware of dog. Forget the dog, beware of owner. As seen on TV. One size fits all. Hand wash only, tumble dry on low heat. Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate. No substitutions allowed. For a limited time only. Type hard, you are making five copies. This software is a void pointer to null where prohibited, protected, declared private, taxed, or otherwise restricted. Software is provided "as is" without any warranties expressed or implied. User assumes all liabilities. Not liable for damages due to use or misuse or inability to understand. An equal opportunity electron employer. No shirt, no shoes, no software. Quantities are limited while supplies last. Do not write below this line. Falling rock. Falling bridge. London bridge is falling down, falling down, help, I've fallen and I can't get up. Quality may vary. Since software is hand-crafted, there will be slight differences in each object. If defects are discovered, do not attempt to fix them yourself, but return to an authorized service center. No Parking. No Standing. No Solicitors. No Spitting. No Kidding. Posted no Bills. No alcohol, dogs, or horses. No anchovies please. Parental Advisory - explicit source code. No one under 17 admitted. Keep away from sunlight, pets, and small children. Limit one per family. No money down. No purchase necessary. Cache and carry. You do not need to be present to win. Some assembly and C++ required. Batteries not included. Action figures sold separately. Apply only to affected area. May be too intense for some viewers. Do not stamp. Use other side for additional listings. For recreational use only. Do not disturb. All models are over 18 years of age. Available in fine shoe stores everywhere. Take a number please. Preservatives added to improve freshness. Safety goggles must be worn at all times. Hard hat area. Sealed for your protection. The buss stops here. Call before you dig. Add toner. Sanitized for your protection. Place stamp here. How about a nice game of chess? EXTERN use only. If a rash, redness, irritation, or swelling develops, discontinue use and consult your magic eight ball. Use only with proper ventilation. Avoid extreme temperatures. Store in a cool dry place. Refrigerate after opening. Keep away from open flames and avoid inhaling fumes. Avoid contact with eyes. Do not puncture, incinerate, or store above 120 degrees Fahrenheit. If this software begins to smoke, run, do not walk, towards the nearest exit. Do not place near any magnetic source. Smoking this software may be hazardous to your health. Stop playing with that atomic pile. You are not in Kansas any more. I/O, I/O, its off to work I go. Slippery when wet. For office use only. Not affiliated with the CIA. Drop in any mailbox. Edited for television. A proud sponsor of the local chapter of the old hackers home. Code used in this software was made from 100% recycled electrons. Prosecutors will be violated. No animals were used to test the runtime performance of this software. No extra salt, MSG, artificial color or flavoring added. If ingested, do not induce vomiting. If symptoms persist, delete yourself immediately. If you suspect an overloaded operator, destroy immediately. Constantly volatile when exposed to static pointers. The white zone is for passenger loading and unloading only. Do you like gladiator movies? Content's under press

  9. Overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The EVLA says "4. Anything I make with my own computer is my property, and you cannot use if in any form."

    Isn't restricting their use of conditional logic a little bit extreme?

    1. Re:Overkill by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny
      The EVLA says " 4. Anything I make with my own computer is my property, and you cannot use if in any form."
      Isn't restricting their use of conditional logic a little bit extreme?

      It's a security drive. The well-known if programming construct is old-fashioned, and therefore a security risk. Instead, you are now required to do everything via polymorphism and virtual methods. That way the form doesn't matter, you see...

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  10. stop payment? I have a better idea.... by kaltkalt · · Score: 5, Funny

    "if you violate any of these terms we will stop payment" ... huh? What if they violate the EVLA 6 months after you buy the software? How can you stop payment then? You can't. You'd have to sue.

    I have a better idea. Make them agree that when you pay them, you are only giving them A LICENSE to use your money. You can revoke that license (i.e. get your money back) at any time, and for any reason. Would there be a failure of consideration (thus making the contract void for ya non-legal peeps)? No, due to time value of money. You get the money back, but not with interest. So they did get some consideration - the use of your money until you ask for it back.

    Yeah, you'd still probably have to sue them to get them to quit pirating your money (violating the license agreement), but we can start a BSA type group to enforce such horrible, criminal violations on a large scale. I mean, come on.... taking a license to use someone's money and not giving the money back when the license is revoked is .. well it's sorta kinda like breaking into their house and stealing the money from their piggybank. Damn, I am a genius today.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  11. You forgot the preface... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful



    They're called "shrink wrap licenses" because you usually can't read them until you've paid for the product and opened the package. And they usually say that by simply opening the package you've already agreed to the license terms that you couldn't even read until after you opened the package -- and we'll just bet the store didn't let you do that before you paid for it.

    End user license agreements are designed to protect the manufacturer and may take away a lot of your rights. They may prohibit you from reviewing their product, give the manufacturer the right to revoke your right to use a software package at any time, or even state that files you create using the product belong to the vendor, not to you.

    In this age of growing software monopolies, draconian licensing agreements, and oppressive legislation like UTICA and DMCA, we try to turn the tables with the Lite Side's

    (Continue to start of parent comment...)

    </pointlesskarmawhoring>

  12. Re:stop payment? I have a better idea.... by kaltkalt · · Score: 5, Funny

    quit modding it funny... i'm serious. If I buy their software and only get a license to use it, then I'll give them a license to use my money. It's still my money (just like it's still their software). If we all agree that we will not buy any software unless they accept this condition, we'll make the world a better place. Birds will sing all day long. Chipmunks and pitbulls will play together.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  13. are EULAs binding? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    I trained my cat to click on them, but I rarely boot to anything but Linux so she's getting out of practice. Come to think of it, I don't think OS X and OS 9 even have entries in my bootloader.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  14. End users protection association by thinkliberty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We need a Better Business Bureau like association for EULA's. Where software companies can get their software certified and then being able to display a seal of approval on the packaging by having their EULA user friendly. There could be different levels of friendliness and reviews on software that didn't want to apply for certification.

    1. Re:End users protection association by El+Cubano · · Score: 2, Funny

      We need a Better Business Bureau like association for EULA's. Where software companies can get their software certified and then being able to display a seal of approval on the packaging by having their EULA user friendly. There could be different levels of friendliness and reviews on software that didn't want to apply for certification.

      We already have something like that, but unfortunately the corporations beat us to it. The seal of approval you speak of bears the wording "Designed for Windows XP" (or something similar) and signifies that software has passed Redmond's rigorous anti-user friendly requirements.

  15. Print it on the back of your check by namespan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've actually heard of people doing something like this by writing on the back of a check something to the effect of "By endorsing or cashing this check, you agree to the following conditions...."

    Not all the different from the $2-$5 checks that periodically come in the mail, which by cashing sign you up for some stupid, inanen service that nearly no one actually needs...

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    1. Re:Print it on the back of your check by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Funny

      doesnt work because, primarily, the minimum wage desk jockey rubber-stamping endorsements is not an agent with the authority to accept such a condition.

      Yeah, but that should cut both ways. The next time you buy some software that you might have a click-through EULA, have the neighbor kid install it.

    2. Re:Print it on the back of your check by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't work the first time, but after eventually becoming aware of what's going on the employer would get a responsiblity to tell "the minimum wage desk jockey rubber-stamping endorsements" not to put any check with a license agreement into the path that leads to it being cashed.

      Once bosses that do have the authority to make such agreements become aware that kids are putting their endorsement stamp next to agreements they don't want them making, it becomes their duty to stop them from doing that... they can try to look the other way, that can only last for so long. They'd have to take on the expense of double-checking the backs of all checks, or simply stop taking checks and insist everybody pay with a credit card.

  16. Here's a better one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Disclaimer to be used when purchasing software:

    This check is fully warranted against physical defects and poor workmanship in its stationery. If the check is physically damaged, return it to me and I will replace or repair it at my discretion. No other warranty of any kind is made, neither expressed nor implied including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of Merchantability, Suitability for Purpose, and Validity of Currency. Any and all risk concerning the actual value of this check is assumed by you, the recipient. Even though I or my agents may have assured you of its worth, either verbally or in written communication, we may have had our fingers crossed, so don't come whimpering back to me if it bounces.

    The money, if any, represented by this instrument remains my property. You are licensed to use it, however you are not allowed to copy the original check except for your personal records, nor are you permitted to give the money itself to anyone else. Neither may you allow any other person to use the money. Remember, you may have it in your possession, but it still belongs to me, and I'm going to call on you from time to time just to keep tabs on it.

    This agreement supersedes all others between us, including the equally ridiculous one you have undoubtedly pasted on the back of your packaging, or concealed somewhere in the middle of it. The location of your version of this or any other covenant between us is irrelevant to its inapplicability here. Only this one pertains, and I really mean it. In fact, this one supersedes yours even though yours may say that it supersedes mine. Why, even if yours said it would supersede mine even if mine said it would supersede yours even if yours said... Oh well. You get the idea.

    You may decline this agreement by returning the uncashed check to me within twenty-four hours. If you attempt to cash it, however, you have implicitly accepted these terms. You may also implicitly accept these terms by:

    1) Calling my bank to inquire about the status of my account;

    2) Thanking me at the conclusion of our business transaction;

    3) Going to bed at the end of this or any other day; or

    4) Using any toilet or rest room.

    Please be advised that I have adopted a strict rubber-glue policy. Any nasty thing that your lawyers say bounces off of me and sticks back to you. Be further advised that you agree to pay my legal expenses if I decide to sue you for violating this agreement or for any other reason that might strike my fancy. Violations will be punishable by fine, imprisonment, death, any two of the above, or all three.

  17. Another counter-EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  18. retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    it's not karma whoring if your an AC

  19. Re:stop payment? I have a better idea.... by MikeFM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've actually considered offering access to some of my software on that kind of basis. You give me the required amount when you start using it and get your money back when you stop using it but I get to collect interest on the money while it's in my hands. The software tracks digital money across different websites I made. You can buy/sell stuff in my EBay type site, buy stuff from me, play games, etc paying with digital money but can cash out if you want (but again with me keeping the interest). The main benefit would actually be that there would be far fewer fees involved (as PayPal, credit card processing, etc are somewhat expensive) and rather than charging fees to support the site I'd be able to just use the interest on the money I'm holding. Maybe a fee if you cashed out sooner than 60 days after buying the digital money.. to stop wanks from doing it 20 times a day.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  20. Legislation by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What is really needed is legislation that protects an end user's basic rights before an EULA is even drawn up - a law that states clearly that an EULA cannot revoke the very basic privileges available to all consumers (somehow software seems exempt, as vendors are able to drastically limit rights in coniving ways, such as hiding the EULA within the shrink wrap. Such under-handed techniques are not allowed in the sale of most other products).

    This type of thing (what is mentioned in the article) would work, but only if a vast majority of consumers decided to join such a group. I say we find a way to protect the rights of everyone.

  21. Send them the EVLA after purchase by rollingcalf · · Score: 5, Funny

    They don't let us see the EULA until after we purchase the product, so we don't have to let them to see the EVLA until after purchase either.

    Just write up your own EVLA and mail it to them, remembering to include the following:

    If you do not accept the terms of this agreement, you have 14 days to reimburse the purchase price plus sales taxes and the software product will be returned to you. Failure to return the money within 14 days indicates acceptance of the agreement, which supercedes all End User Licensing Agreements past, present or future.

    Then if the manufacturer ever gets around to replying to you, tell them you are not responsible for returning the product; the store where you bought it will send them one. Or if the store contacts you, direct them to the manufacturer.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  22. Actually.. by Squidgee · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What if a "union" of sorts was created, and got companies to agree to one of these sort of things, and then to enforce it when the users' liscense is violated..?

    Would this be possible? Feasible? Ok prolly not but still, it'd be cool.

    1. Re:Actually.. by HBI · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Labor unions rely on compulsion in most cases - if you work here, you must belong to the union. This works - no one can circumvent it. Who is going to force geeks to join this union though? So, it's a given it's all-volunteer as you have framed it.

      Any volunteer action is by its nature flaky and prone to miscarry. All you have to do is join a fraternal organization (Elks, Moose, one of the veterans groups, etc) to see this. We're talking about disciplined, together people who hold down jobs and run businesses, and getting a Friday night dinner together is a fiasco. People don't show, people don't want to wash dishes, we ran out of ketchup, etc.

      Look at all the abandoned Sourceforge projects for an illustration of how ineffective volunteer projects can be. Collective volunteer action is very inefficient and downright maddening in many cases. It is a given then that this has a be a real organization with expenses and a revenue stream, otherwise it just isn't going to happen.

      In the abstract, your idea is great. Get every geek to join a group to enforce license restrictions to benefit the consumer. But what happens when the person(s) running the group becomes suspect to some of the group? (think ICANN here) Does the group fork? Probably some people drop out or no longer participate.

      How effective is a pressure group without numbers behind it? The NRA wields power because they have the signatures of X million people behind them. (I forget how many...3 million?). We're talking membership dues here just to keep track of all the people to demonstrate your size and power. (they charge $25 a year for a basic membership I think)

      How many people really care about this kind of stuff, enough to fork over $20 or whatever a year? Ten thousand? A hundred thousand? Is that enough to change Microsoft's mind? How about Pkware? How about Intuit?

      I don't know the answers to many of these questions, but I have a feeling the answers to some of them are 'no' or 'not', as appropriate.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:Actually.. by repetty · · Score: 2

      "Labor unions rely on compulsion in most cases - if you work here, you must belong to the union. This works - no one can circumvent it."

      Not in Texas it doesn't. Texas is a "right-to-work" state. More importantly, the concept of unions run contrary to the Texas way of thinking... always have.

      It's just a cultural thing.

      --Richard

  23. Re:stop payment? I have a better idea.... by Squidgee · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That's actually a wicked cool idea. I'd be intersted to see a digital-only site (No boxed software) with such a thing. This would work well for things like, for instance, MS Office, Windows, Mac OS X, Codewarrior, Maya, etc. Anything big and expensive; it limits the amount the people have to invest in the software, but the company can still make plenty.

    And, I'd imagine, they'd get more "sales". I'd also suggest and end date; ~3 years maybe?

  24. SVLA by zurab · · Score: 2, Informative

    This idea is not new. I've actually seen such proposals months if not few years back. More on this later on.

    Overall, the linked EVLA is more user-oriented - it has demands that are annoying to some end users such as "don't make me click more than once", "don't ask me twice if I want to quit", "ask me to register only once", etc., etc.

    Even though it does qualify as funny, it doesn't really address what should be in this kind of "agreement" and definitely doesn't address the terms and conditions that are imposed by most EULAs. These conditions include restrictions on types of use, reverse-engineering, vendors' rights to revoke license at any time, vendors' rights to invade users' homes, users' non-existent rights, etc., etc.

    If you would like to look at a more serious document related towards this issue, look at Software Vendor License Agreement that I found before. That would seem more fair to me.

  25. They missed a couple by kimbly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    11. You must never install software on my computer that hijacks other software, causing it to display popups or to add affiliate ids to purchases I make.

    12. You must never install software on my computer that connects to a remote server, unless the software first obtains my permission to do so, and explains what information will be sent to the remote server.

  26. Legislation... is unnecessary by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What is really needed is legislation that protects an end user's basic rights before an EULA is even drawn up - a law that states clearly that an EULA cannot revoke the very basic privileges available to all consumers (somehow software seems exempt, as vendors are able to drastically limit rights in coniving ways, such as hiding the EULA within the shrink wrap. Such under-handed techniques are not allowed in the sale of most other products).

    In several Western countries, you cannot legally sign away your basic rights. It doesn't matter what the vendors put in a contract, EULA or any other document, how much you pay for it or what you have to sign. Those rights are yours, and a court will ignore any documentation that doesn't respect that.

    This is why you find disclaimers in things like EULAs that if one part is found not to hold, the rest still does, etc. It's also why big businesses like Microsoft are terrified of a serious test case that might establish a precedent that EULAs have no legal weight because of the way they are set up. The net effect is that they rely on threats of legal action to get what the EULA would seek to secure for them, because it's the best chance they've got in most places and they know it.

    This is not to say that you should flagrantly ignore things you know to be in an EULA unless you want to play dice with the courts. But you're pretty safe in ignoring any unreasonable conditions, because it's about a 110% certainty that they won't be legally enforceable anyway.

    No, I'm not a lawyer, this isn't legal advice, and Slashdot is not the place for serious legal discussion. But use your common sense: no court is going to uphold something as manifestly unreasonable as a contract you supposedly agree to before you even have chance to read it. In fact, some places even have laws to the effect that if you can't reasonably be expected to understand a contract, you can't legally have entered into it. Not sure EULAs would fall within that, but it would be an interesting case...

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  27. the point with the stores is.. by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...to follow your (good) idea, you *already* have a legitimate purchaser of large amounts of software-it's those stores. They are your major force multiplier and our societies normal middleman and representative between you, the end user and the software vendors. They are MOST definetly involved, they make bundlkes of cash as well on selling that stuff. The stores get it wholesale, then retail it.. They start to get lots of complaints and demands for them to sign your acceptable use and full disclosure and acceptance of liability contract to counter the lame EULA nonsense, or *no sale*. THAT will get back to the vendors. Just like going in, hauling crippled cds up to the counter, then saying "no sale if these won't play in all my cdplayers".

    It's normal activism, it's a boycott in advance, but they have to SEE that it might affect sales, you leave the store manager standing there with stock to put back on the shelf and a no-sale potential customer walking out the door. One, he'll think it's a crank, a few hundred in any one store, he WILL note this. In hundreds of stores? You just might see some changes, by pass that washington DC nonsense, take em on mano y mano with the cash. That's all they care about, the cash, so that's where you attack.

    That way, you don't have to fib and pose as a big buyer, you let the real big buyers transfer complaints. It happens all the time. I can give you an example, where it WORKED,-compleely different but it happened-rosie O donnel and K mart. I know I was part of hundreds of thousands of complaints that went to Kmart over using her in advertising, both written complaints and in person store complaints, direct to the stores managers. told them _no, repeat_no sale until she goes, your choice mr kmart, take it or leave it".

    It worked, but it took a lot of people doing it. But it worked. She got the boot, kmart saw dropped sales. they never admited that was the reason, but the timing proved otherwise.

    The SAME thing can be done with crippled CDs, crippled players, or stupid software EULAS that force spyware on you and offer no warranty or guarantee, bork your computer, etc, etc, all the things we talk about that happen,and a huge reluctance or denial of any money back on software. It's ridiculous, it's really lame it's been allowed to get so embedded in the industry, it's the only product out there in a major multi billion dollar industry sold like that, with a full skate of liability to the profiteers of same. (that I can think of handily at least)

    I understand the necessity when software was the province of only a few thousand people on the planet and was still in the highly experimental phase, but there's no reason to continue to extend that get out of jail free card to them any more, there just isn't. It's "matured" enough as an industry so that the next plateau can be achieved,which is normal liabilities. Closed, non free propietary software is frantically defended as "a product". Swell. Have it their way then. They insist, whine, demand that their IP be treated as a tangible product, swell, no problems, then let normal "product" rules and laws apply. One or the other,they can make up their minds, and the customers can help if they choose to by DEMANDING it happen.

    DARE to demand and boycott until you get what you want and what is the right thing to do, "we the software buyers people" have tremendous clout, because the vendors make zero $ without us handing it over, and yes, it's really that simple.

    Another example, just happened, a sort of victory, with quicken. They got so many complaints and threats to boycott and whatnot they changed. it CAN be done across the industry, just needs doing, and how hard is it to NOT buy something??? Costs ZERO to boycott!

  28. Re:Help??? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
    Can anyone help me with this problem?

    Yeah.

    Quit trying to post to slashdot and get back to work.

    --your boss

  29. Re:n is whatever the last number was by FCKGW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Aw crap, sorry about that; I forgot to put in the paragraph tags. My post should read:

    n+1. Seeing that I paid for this software, I shall use it as I see fit. There are to be no restrictions on use.

    n+2. I may reverse engineer anything I damn well please to make your product interact properly with another, or to get around your DRM restricting my legitimate use.

    n+3. My desktop, quick launch bar, the top of my Start menu, my StartUp menu, my NT services, and the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\Run key are sacred. Your installer will not put anything in any of these locations without my express permission, and by default it won't touch them.

    n+4. I will choose exactly which icons are installed on my Start menu, and where. You are not to make yourself a program group (or FIVE in the case of Epson) and dump icons for your program, EULA, website, help file, and uninstaller in it. I'm tired of cleaning up after program installs.

    n+5. Your EULA shall NOT change when I install bug fixes, ESPECIALLY security updates.

    n+6. You may ask me to register, but I may choose not to and still receive all the benefits of your software.

    n+7. Shrink-wrap licenses are hereby banned. Any EULA must be printed on the front of the box. If it doesn't fit in a reasonably-sized typeface, shorten it until it does.

    n+8. Your uninstaller must work properly.

    n+9. Ads are forbidden in paid-for software; spyware is forbidden in ALL software, including free downloads. If Ad-Aware catches anything after I install your software, you owe me $500, plus the cost of your software.

    n+10. No crippleware. For instance, DVD-playing software must ignore user operation prohibition on DVDs, play DVDs from all regions, and be able to copy the DVD to the hard drive.

    n+11. I may review your product either positively or negatively without asking permission.

    n+12. DRM is hereby banned. It will be cracked anyway and cracked copies will be all over the Internet eventually, likely even before your software is released. Only the honest people will pay, DRM or not, but DRM hurts everyone.

    Okay, that was long-winded, but I feel better now.

    --
    It's an operating system, not a religion.
  30. OT: Best disclaimer I've seen by fireman+sam · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was on a band aid wrapper:

    " contents sterile unless opened "

    Beautiful. Impossible to test the product to see if the disclaimer is truthful.

    Maybe on my next software product I will have an EULA that states " contains no bugs unless open "

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  31. Windows Refund option by bstadil · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is actualy a good idea. Why not do that for machines that can only be bought with windows.

    Who knows you might get a refund. If enough people did this it would create some sort of legal precident that might be useful later.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  32. Notification by heikkile · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is to inform you that I have not clicked to accept your ridiculous EULA, and have *not* accepted your terms. Therefore I feel no way bound by that EULA.

    I shall continue to use the software based on the rights granted to me by the fair use provisions and the first sale doctrine.

    Should you desire to have the software returned, I am willing to sell my copy back, at the price I paid for it (plus $100 for shipping and handling), but only if you do not try impose any more terms and conditions on this return sale.

    This offer is valid for a 7 days. If I do not hear from you in that time, you have implicitly and irrevocably accepted my purchase of the software, non-acceptance of your EULA, and my fair use rights to it.

    Yours sincerely
    ...

    P.S. non-disclaimer: Since you have not paid for me to sign a non-disclosure agreement, I reserve the right to publish what ever you send me.

    --

    In Murphy We Turst

    1. Re:Notification by Pofy · · Score: 3, Informative

      >I know this sounds crazy, but what software di
      >you get to install after you declined? I hit
      >decline on some, and it refused to continue the
      >install.

      That is a sort of forced agreement situation, that is, you go to a store and buy something, then someone (which happens to be the one who manufactured what you bought, not the one selling it by the way) tries to force you into an agreement when you try to use something that you bought. Such agreements are not valid in most countries I would say (there are many other aspects of the process that doesn't make it valid contracts either by the way).

      Someone might claim you did not in fact buy anything in the store to start with which of course is wrong, normal sale laws impies that that it is a sale and it was made in the shop. Nothing else was agreed upon or made into a contract at the point of purchase. A normal sale in other words. The fact that there is some sort of EULA that is forced upon you LATER is irrelevant since it does not hande or is part of your purchase.

      Imagine if a a refrigirator manufacturer behaved in a similar fashin, You buy the refridgirator, take it home and the first time you open up the door, inside it covering the power on button you see a paper with a lengthy text. It claims that if you remove the paper and power it on (you have to remove the paper to power it on by the way), you agree to many things, such as not having bought the refridgirator at all, just a licensce to use it, there is no guarantees it works, they can at any time come home and check out all your other machines in your house, and so on, and so on. Of course that would not be OK.

      And no, you don't NEED any special permission to use something just because it happens to have copyrights attached to it. YOu can use, read, run, whatever at will as long as you don't do any of the things explicit not allowed in copyright laws, which is mostly distribution, various forms of copying, public performance and so on, most having exceptions so that you can still do it in some cases (typically refered to as "fair use" I think, although it might be called something different in english, not sure.

      So don't worry even if you DO click agree, especially since it in many cases in various countries does not even fullfill the requirements for how a contract/agreement is entered into.

  33. Re:Nice idea by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I believe that's one of the points. If you are wondering whether this EVLA is enforceable, maybe that will get you to thinking about whether the typical EULA is enforceable.

    A lot of people are still buffaloed by EULA's. Instead of blasting the issuer for stupidly wasting time and money paying lawyers to write rules that have no legal leg to stand on (something those lawyers know full well if they're not complete incompetents), they complain about the draconian restrictions and duties these rules impose. Complain about the existence first. Skipping straight to arguments against the content implicitly legitimizes the existence.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  34. A more thorough agreement: by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought that something more along the shrinkwrap vein was the way to go. I've considered mailing something like the following to software publishers:

    This document is a legal agreement between your firm and
    [purchaser name here] for any and all software sold to [your
    name here], whether sold directly or through authorized
    resellers. By accepting payment, either directly or
    indirectly, for any such software, you agree to be bound by
    the terms of this agreement.

    If there is a conflict between the terms of any End User
    License Agreement ("EULA") or other agreement(s) enclosed
    with the software product and this document, the terms of
    this document will define the legal limits and obligations
    of the parties. Any changes to the terms of this agreement
    must be made in writing and must be signed and notarized by
    both parties to be considered binding.

    Software Product License

    Scope of License

    [purchaser name here] may install software on as many
    computers as are under his/her control, so long as the
    software is in active use on only one such computer at a
    time.

    Backup Rights

    Our firm grants [purchaser name here] permission to make
    backup copies of and and all software and documentation and
    explicitly permits user to circumvent any technical means
    employed limit copying of said software and documentation.

    Burden of Proof

    [purchaser name here] will not be required to retain copies
    of original media, packaging, printed license, receipt, or
    any other documentation or materials in order to retain
    license to use said software. It is the responsibility of
    our firm to prove any claims that we make against user
    relating to copyright infringement or violation of the terms
    of any software license.

    Sale or Transfer

    If [purchaser name here] sells or transfers the software
    license, [purchaser name here] must convey or destroy any
    electronic or physical copies of software, license, and
    documentation.

    Warranty

    Software is guaranteed to perform as advertised and
    documented by our firm for a period of not less than one
    year after date of purchase by [purchaser name here].

    Remedies

    If software has defects which cause it to not perform as
    described within the warranty period (see above), [purchaser
    name here] may return software to place of purchase for a
    full refund.

    If [purchaser name here] is denied a refund by seller for
    defective software, [purchaser name here] is granted
    permission to rent or sublicense software in order to recoup
    purchase price. Alternatively, [purchaser name here], is
    granted license to use later, corrected versions of software
    at no additional charge.