Widespread Use of Hydrogen May Hurt Ozone Layer
Saeger writes "The AP has a story about a CalTech study which has found that the Hydrogen Economy may deplete the ozone layer by 'as much as 8 percent' on the assumption that '10 percent to 20 percent of the hydrogen would leak from pipelines, storage facilities, processing plants and fuel cells in cars and at power plants.'" CalTech's press release has more information.
And BOOM! Do we really want to be able to blow our planet up with one match? I think not!
at least most major cities will be intact and not underwater.
This hydrogen pollution especially occurs when the hydrogen is mixed in a 2:1 ratio with oxygen.
Right.
KARMA TAG! You're it.
I was afraid the Environmentalist Bubble was going to burst!
This shouldn't be too hard to deal with.
All we need to keep this problem in check is an oversized Zippo in orbit right near the ozone layer.
Activate it every Fourth of July for one helluva fireworks show.
Obliteracy: Words with explosions
Oh, the humanity!
This is a conspiracy by an evil coalition of blimp manufacturers who share a concern that their products will cease to function properly should the atmosphere become contaminated with too much Hydrogen.
Does this mean we need an alternative fuel for an alternative fuel?
Can't we have a radiation shield for the Earth which is a little more reliable? A few CFCs, a little hydrogen, and it's disappearing all over the place. Bad design. Someone should have considered these possibilities before installing it. If I installed a firewall which was this delicate, I'd be canned.
Of course, IPv6 will probably fix all this.
Another key question is how the residence time of H2 in the stratosphere compares to the residence time of CO2 in the troposphere. If H2 has a significantly shorter residence time than the 120 year residence time of anthropogenic CO2, then it would be a good choice to switch to H2 today and then replace H2 with another alternative at a future date, since the H2 would drop back to its natural level faster than CO2 would. If H2 has a longer residence time in the stratosphere, then the best choice might be to stick with CO2 emissions.
I knew we should have gone with cold fusion!
No way! PHP is much better...
You're right. And so we here at Slashdot have elected you as our first "number-thinning" sacrifice.
I'll show you some hydrogen leakage -- just pull my finger.
If 10% leakage causes an 8% depletion, then if we just pumped the hydrogen straight into the air we could get rid of 80% of the ozone and save the hassle of having a middle-man! Woo-hoo! Way to go Cal-Tech!
"He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
"One person with a campfire is nothing, 100 million people with campfires and..."
...you have Yellowstone National Park on a fourth of July weekend.
No matter what, it has side-effects.
Nuclear: radiation poisening risk
Coal: dust causes cancer
Gas: Kills ozone layer
Hydrogen: Kills ozone layer
Windmills: Throw off earth's equitorial tilt and ice tossed from blades stabs children playing in thier backyards and the humming sounds keep people awake at night, turning them into postal killers.
Oxen (pulling carts): Poop causes mathane, which pollutes and spreads fly-borne desease.
Staying home and jacking off: Blindness
There's no way out. Lets just pollute the fscking planet and be done with it.
Table-ized A.I.
This is quite possibly the only environmental study in the history of modern science which may actually help the republicans.
If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
ETHANOL IS PEOPLE! PEEEEEE-PULLLLL!
Username taken, please choose another one.
Its our numbers, not the action that destroys our environment.
Well then, I guess this is the answer.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.