Slashdot Mirror


AOL Dropping RIM for Danger Sidekick

Eponymous Meow Word writes "After trying to cut the cord for wireless e-mail with RIM, AOL is pulling the plug on its mobile communicator, citing a move away from its older wireless technology. The disgruntled can get a discount on a shiny new T-Mobile color Sidekick." Wireless email is a rather small niche, and it's cool that current users won't be left high and dry, but it looks like they'll have to pay some money to continue using the service.

94 comments

  1. AOL Communicator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't forget about AOL Communicator, the Mozilla-based AOL email client. Hopefully they don't decide to drop this project too, in favor of Microsoft-based solutions. Pushing AOL Communicator would push Gecko onto millions of subscribers' computers, and possibly allow for choice of rendering engine.

    --
    Free pr0n.

  2. ssh-hhhhh by freedommatters · · Score: 1
    i'd never even heard of the device. looks pretty neat if limited.

    my life has never been the same since i got rid of my nokia communicator 9000i. being able to telnet into my server was really neat. i just got sick of carrying a brick around though. any small phones that do ssh now?

    john
    are you a weapon of male destruction? you need one of our snazzy t-shirts

    1. Re:ssh-hhhhh by juuri · · Score: 1

      There is port of putty to the P800. Not exactly a small phone but much smaller than what you were carrying before.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    2. Re:ssh-hhhhh by freedommatters · · Score: 1
      thanks juuri, i'll take a look

      john
      are you a weapon of male destruction? you need one of our snazzy t-shirts

    3. Re:ssh-hhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the Handspring Treo 300 with Top Gun SSH. Works like a charm, and the Treo is small. :)

    4. Re:ssh-hhhhh by m_c0upe · · Score: 1

      I have a samsung I330 smartphone which runs palmos. There is a free SSH client available for palm os at: http://www.offshore.com.ai/~iang/TGssh/

    5. Re:ssh-hhhhh by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's a brick, and it's Symbian instead of GEOS, but the Nokia 9210 might be good. It's also got a color screen... drool... I need the 9290, because I live in the US, but the 9000i implies you live in Europe or Asia, so a 9210 will do the trick. (Actually, the 9290 is a relabled 9210 with a different GSM signal for the US)

    6. Re:ssh-hhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Handspring is rumored to have a new device coming out RSN. It's supposed to be smaller than the old style Treo devices. Since it's been said that it runs Palm OS 5, that would mean that it can run Top Gun SSH, though that only supports ssh version 1.

      It has a thumb keyboard, but I'd rather Graffiti my way in.

  3. *cough* by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wouldn't it be great to haul Google out of your pocket at the bar

    No. No, it wouldn't.

    1. Re:*cough* by Paleomacus · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there's a point were you just have to leave the geek behind. There are other things to focus on at a bar...Like Guiness.

      Now it might be great for a meathead who can't remember his own name so he's going to use it as a brain extension.

    2. Re:*cough* by Requiem · · Score: 0

      I prefer a pint of Guinness, myself. Guiness...is that like Fudd? ;)

    3. Re:*cough* by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      I go into the bar to get the hell away from Google.

      -B

    4. Re:*cough* by Uart · · Score: 1

      I go to the bar to try to get laid.

      The Internet doesn't belong in a bar. It doesn't impress drunk chicks.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    5. Re:*cough* by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      I apologize, mis-spelling Guinness is a capitol crime. It wasn't me...The wookie did it ! Yeah that's right, Chewbacca.

      /ducks
      /runs
      /hides
      /proceeds to shave all body hair

    6. Re:*cough* by PD · · Score: 1

      Beer googles. It doesn't make them look any better, but you can see if they ever got their mugshot on the Smoking Gun.

  4. Makes sense... by cowmix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having used both the RIM and currently the SideKick, the SideKick give a user experience that mimics AIM desktop client a lot better than the RIM devices. The SideKick UI, in general, will be much more attractive to AOL users.

    1. Re:Makes sense... by RevMike · · Score: 1

      You're crazy. SideKick provides none of the AOL experience.

      I activate SideKick by pressing the left and right shift keys simultaneously, but the hot keys are configurable. Then I can get a notepad, a phone dialer, a calculator, even and ascii code chart.

      AOL doesn't work anything like that.

    2. Re:Makes sense... by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 1

      Aw man, you're *way* too out of date with this joke. Nobody here even remembers Sidekick, or TSRs, or how incredibly cool they could be.

      Of course, the fact that Sidekick will take up lots of your available memory and make your computer periodically crap out or freeze up, and won't play nice with all your other software *does* sort of bring to mind the AOL experience. As I recall.

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

    3. Re:Makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nobody here even remembers Sidekick, or TSRs, or how incredibly cool they could be.

      imho, TSR has gone down since it was bought by Wizards of the Coast

  5. Why a small niche? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why should wireless email be a small niche? As best I can tell, it's the most useful application of wireless data capabilities. The problem is still in the UI and portability, as best as I can ascertain (well, and the cost). If there were a better way to navigate emails and send emails from a wireless device that wasn't overly bulky, it wouldn't be so niche. I mean, most modern digital cell phones now will let you set up and check email, it's just an excruciating user experience to try to do much of it (and I want to push a single button and get to my damned Inbox, not have to navigate 4 or 5 levels deep in REMARKABLY slow server-side menus like I have to currently with every TMobile phone out there, not to mention the fact that about 30% of the time, one of those menu loads hangs forcing me to restart the whole process). We don't need 3G networks as much as we need some basic thought put into how people really want to use small wireless devices.


    The Sidekick is great, but too bulky for your average Joe. It's too bulky for me too, to be honest, so I just suffer with my otherwise very excellent Samsung S105 cell phone, which nominally lets me monitor incoming emails. The most promising models I've seen are the upcoming SPH-I500 (as in here) and similar phone-form-factor Palm PDAs, which come very close to what I want. Add one of those newfangled laser-keyboard devices, and you've got a winner IMHO. And PLEASE stop sticking cameras on every phone.

    1. Re:Why a small niche? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y should wireless email be some little-ass niche? Step off, Pharoah. As best I
      kin tell, it be da damn most useful applicashun o' wireless data capabilities.
      Step up. Da bug-up-da-ass be still in da U-I an' portability, as best as I kin
      ascertain (down low, well, an' da damn cost). If dair wuz some betta' way t'
      navigate emails an' send emails from some wireless device dat waint over-like
      bulky, it wouldn't be so's niche. I main, most modern digital cell phones now
      will let yo' ass set down an' check email, it be plum some 'escruciatin' usa'
      'espuh'ience t' try t' do much o' it (down low, an' I wanna push some single
      button an' git t' mah damned Inbox, not got'ta navigate 4 o' 5 levels deep in
      REMARKABLY slow serva'-side menus likes I got'ta current-like wit' every
      Tmobile phone out dair, not t' menshun da fact dat about 30% o' da damn time,
      one o' dose-dair menu loads hangs forcin' me t' restart da damn whole process).
      We duzn't need 3-G networks as much as we need some kinda' basic thought put
      into how sucka's tru-ly wanna 'esploit little-ass wireless devices.

      Da Sidekick be great, but too bulky 4 yo' average Joe. No diggety. It be too
      bulky 4 me too, t' be straight, so's I plum suffa' wit' mah otherwise real damn
      'escellent Samsung S-1-0-fuckin'-5 cell phone, which nominal-like lets me
      monita' incomin' emails. Sheeeiit. Da most promisin' models I've seen be da
      damn upcomin' S-P-fuckin'-H-I-5-Dubba-0 (down low, as in in da house
      [palmblvd.com]) an' similah' phone-form-facta' Palm Pdas, which come real damn
      close t' whut I want. Add one o' dose-dair newfangled lasa'-keybo'd devices,
      an' you've gots some winna' I-M-H-fuckin'-O. An' P-L-E-A-S-fuckin'-E stop
      stickin' cameras on every phone.

    2. Re:Why a small niche? by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

      I have a Sony Ericsson T300 from T-Mobile. You're right about the T-Zones online e-mail features being online useless. (The online AIM is even worse -- did you ever try to have a conversation where it takes you over a minute to send a two-word reply through T-Mobile's horrible interface?) However, the phone has a built-in email client that will connect without going through T-Mobile's menus. You can connect through a dial-up connection. (You can't define your own login script though, so it might not work.) You can also use the T-Zones connection to connect directly to your POP/SMTP server.

    3. Re:Why a small niche? by mixy1plik · · Score: 1

      I want to agree with you on your point about manufacturers putting cameras on everything. I have both a SprintPCS phone and a Sidekick with T-Mobile. For AIM and email, the SK is a wonderful little brick. It's got more heft, but it does what it does very well. The keypad is well-executed, as is the functionality when it comes to navigating around the device. However, it absolutely sucks as a phone. Dialing is a chore, and it feels weird against your head. The camera attachment is, for lack of a better term, completely useless.

      Now that the color SK is out, I feel pretty ripped off having shelled out the $200 for this B&W one hardly 8 months ago, but those are the breaks. I'm a geek. :)

      The bottom line is, for the basic function of chatting and email, the SK does it better than any fully-featured multifunction gadget I've ever used. Beyond that, it leaves many points with much to be desired.

    4. Re:Why a small niche? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Excellent commentary about UI challenges, Fnkmaster. Are you talking about the T-Zones stuff that you have to go through to get to the "My Email" section, or the My Email section itself? We are very curious to hear.

      As one who works for the technology provider that T-Mobile uses to allow direct access to various mailboxes [POP, IMAP, Exchange, Notes, Hotmail, and others] from phones and other handhelds, I can assure you that your comments have already made our bulletin board.

      Posting anonymously, for hopefully obvious reasons.

    5. Re:Why a small niche? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, Herbert Kornfeld.

    6. Re:Why a small niche? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      What is wrong with a camera in the phone? Hell, they've had it in Japan for a few years now IIRC and people seem to love it. I for one would love to have a camera phone.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  6. Great by subreality · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I'm going to have to buy a fleet of these, to replace our executives' Blackberries, so they won't get pissed off for losing the digital dick-sizing contest at the country club. Oh, how I love technology.

    1. Re:Great by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      This seems to be a common trait of Execs, Marketing and Sales types. The tech types at my company generally could care less as long as their hardware and service cover their needs. Myself, I avoid answering a phone inside the office I'm sure as hell not going to carry a cell phone.

    2. Re:Great by neomiasma · · Score: 1
      "Now I'm going to have to buy a fleet of these, to replace our executives' Blackberries, so they won't get pissed off for losing the digital dick-sizing contest at the country club."

      And since the Sidekick has a camera on it, they'll have pictures so they can prove who's got the biggest digital dick.

      --

      -------
      And we also have a cancel button...in case you don't want toast.
  7. Ha! by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No one is superior to this guy.

  8. Global Wireless Solutions by FooGoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When will someone invent a cheap global wireless solution for email. I don't live on land anymore more I live on a sailboat which spends most of the time in the middle of an ocean. Right now I am using sats for my access which is very expensive. I want a global communicator like in the TV show "Earth Final Conflict" I know the tech exists so someone build the damn thing.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    1. Re:Global Wireless Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the tech exists? How do you plan to connect to the rest of the world when you are in the middle of the ocean without using sats...the earth is curved.

    2. Re:Global Wireless Solutions by sdawara · · Score: 1

      I think your answer lies here:
      http://www.teamon.com/

      - Santosh

      --
      Santosh Dawara
    3. Re:Global Wireless Solutions by transient · · Score: 1

      There is a band of frequencies that follow the curvature of the Earth. This is how LORAN works (marine navigation system with terrestrial transmitters).

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    4. Re:Global Wireless Solutions by louissypher · · Score: 1

      Your in the middle of the ocean trolling Slashdot? Right...

      --
      www.bleepyou.com
  9. Actually, this is kind of a point of frustration by subreality · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always viewed email as asynchronous communication. I answer my emails when I have time, several times a day. If I'm in the middle of something, I don't pay attention to it until I can take a break. But other people don't see it that way, notably my management chain at work. They're already trying to sell me on the idea of one of these things so I can get my email outside work. (WTF for? I carry a cell phone for emergencies. Exactly what kind of a network failure do they think I'm going to fix with email? But I digress.)

    I certainly don't want to discourage the technology, and there are times when I wish I could just drag a decent web browser (NexTel can bite me) out of my pocket. But I'm just afraid that people are going to lose sight of one of the big advantages of email - the fact that it's asynchronous, which is the only way that I can deal with it when I get over a hundred legitimate emails a day. Having my phone ring a hundred times a day will just make me go insane.

  10. WHY NOT? IT WAS INFORMATIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially the part concerning T-Mobile's Sidekick.

  11. Re:+1 Cool by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

    Now if that's not a reacharound, I don't know what is.

  12. Re:Why a small niche? Too much email maybe? by Roblem · · Score: 1

    Without really good spam filters and category filtering, mobile email is all but useless. I get around 80 emails a day (not counting spam) with all the various lists and groups Iâ(TM)m on. I donâ(TM)t need to get at all of that on my phone, let alone slog through that many messages with a mini UI. I use PopFile to do all the categorizing work for me on a home machine running all the time and have a small amount of that mail forwarded to a separate account I use for the phone. It works great for me, but most people donâ(TM)t have such a geeky setup. Until solid email management tools become the standard I donâ(TM)t see mobile email getting out of its niche anytime soon.

  13. google search :) by Kircle · · Score: 1

    I go to the bar to try to get laid. The Internet doesn't belong in a bar. It doesn't impress drunk chicks.

    a google search of kama sutra might.

    --

    -- Kircle

    1. Re:google search :) by Carbonite · · Score: 4, Funny

      It doesn't impress drunk chicks.

      a google search of kama sutra might.


      As someone stated above:

      No. No, it wouldn't.

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    2. Re:google search :) by Uart · · Score: 1

      maybe a google search for "Motel 6"... ...but you won't get to that point if you mention google...

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    3. Re:google search :) by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>I go to the bar to try to get laid. The Internet doesn't belong in a bar. It doesn't impress drunk chicks.

      Yeah, but if you're out of condoms and KY jelly, it'd be useful to be able to google for an open drugstore.

      And maybe for an open liquor store as well.

      --
      Huh?
    4. Re:google search :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who ACTUALLY DID IT. I would have to disagree. IT WORKED YOU STUPID SLIMY BUFFALO CHIP. There is a reason really stupid pickup lines work. I think its because DRUNK CHICKS ARE STUPID. and quite possbily because EARTH GIRLS ARE EASY.

  14. The real reason..... by dracken · · Score: 2, Informative

    ....Why RIM (research in motion's) device is being terminated could be because RIM lost a patent lawsuit against NTP. NTP is a patent holding company which claims to hold patents to "sending text data through wireless" or some such sort. NTP was awarded $23 million in damages and has sued again tripling the damages.

    Is this fair ? you ask. Let me remind you about fivolous lawsuits initiated by RIM against palm and handspring because RIM claimed to hold a patent which covers attaching a keyboard to a mobile device !!. Handspring and palm decided to settle out of court, paid RIM a wad of money and "licenced" the "technology". Evidently what goes around comes around. :(.

    1. Re:The real reason..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I've heard - these lawsuits are not frivolous - the keys have to be in a particular arrangements and dimensions to violate the patents.

      IMHO figuring out the optimal key arrangements and dimensions is NOT a trivial idea so the patents hence the suits seem to be valid.

    2. Re:The real reason..... by wombatmobile · · Score: 1
      Evidently what goes around comes around

      yes, and hot air rises

  15. Grrr by Fizzl · · Score: 1

    Wireless email is a rather small niche

    And for us who mainly browse the web and read home e-mail while walking to work or back from there this seems like a silly statement.
    I use my Nokia Communicator and 3650 regularly to write emails through GSM-data connection or smart messaging relays.

    Oh well.. I guess this AOL thingy has very little to do with my life anyway.

  16. I got a Color sidekick. by ender_wiggins · · Score: 1

    its pretty cool cept the fact i cant add software. I guess there are people that have developer SDKs and write software for it, but Danger/t-mobile wont let you load it. sucks too, such a great package, it would be nice to access other IM(yahoo,msn) and ssh, telnet even.
    I will be getting a 7135 if verizon get off there duff anytime soon.

    1. Re:I got a Color sidekick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the Handspring Treo 300. It runs Palm OS, so you can install whatever you want on it... and it's not as silly-looking as the Sidekick. ;)

  17. Color Sidekick upgrades shipping from T-Mobile by leighklotz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By the way, the pent-up upgrades to color devices for existing customers shipped on Friday. Some have already arrived.

    1. Re:Color Sidekick upgrades shipping from T-Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From this URL

      http://www.blackberry.net/uk/index.shtml

      There also seems to be a picture of a color blackberry...from my experience with it i'd hit it!

  18. I think it has more to do with RIM then AOL.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a veteran of many negotiations with RIM I can say this:

    Dealing with RIM SUCKS ASS!

    These guys are money grubbing nuts. Nothing wrong with being money grubbing but they really hang you out to dry in the deal. Their attitude is 'We own the carrier, we can screw you if we want to'. Everyone wants to play at the carrier level and RIM is one of the few small companies that has gotten there. I could go on and on with stories of how careless RIM is and how arrogant they are. They remind me of that AOL story posted a few days ago. Cowboys man, cowboys.

    Posted anonymously, I still have to deal with these guys regularly...

    1. Re:I think it has more to do with RIM then AOL.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone wants to play at the carrier level and RIM is one of the few small companies that has gotten there.

      WTF are you talking about? There are several carriers you can choose from if you want a RIM. At least around here (Vancouver). In fact, here are the different carrier networks that RIM Blackberries operate on. RIM doesn't own any of them.

      RIM plays at the carrier level no more than anyone else who manufactures a Mobitex or DataTAC device. And there are lots of those, for in-car taxicab terminals, police cruisers, and other dispatch systems.

    2. Re:I think it has more to do with RIM then AOL.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM has existing carrier relationships that 3rd parties can piggy back on.

      its very difficult to get in bed with the big carriers, piggy backing on RIM is one way of doing it. They know this and hold the keys very high and make you jump.

      I know they are not a carrier.

  19. Hitachi P300 on Sprint by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    For you Sprint Vision customers out there, the Hitachi P300 (free with activation) has a built in POP3 Email client. Sure the LCD is tiny, but at least you get a no-brainer mobile email solution.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Hitachi P300 on Sprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What self-respecting geek would want a "no-brainer" solution? They design crap that way for business majors, dude.

  20. "Wireless email is a rather small niche" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wireless email is a rather small niche" Uh, yeah, whatever. A niche that includes every junior school, high school, or college student and nearly every white collar worker once it gets cheaper.

  21. Nobody made a "rimming" joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That makes me sad :(

  22. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well if you modded this discussion and then posted in here.. then those 3 points are a waste.. good job mr moderator...

    see this

  23. Re:Why a small niche? PROFITS! by titaniam · · Score: 1

    Because of hackers and free thinkers, email can be dangerous to the company. My god, emails could come from just about anyone! They might even come from someone who is not paying the company a damn penny to send the email! Better yet, my phone only charges for outgoing emails... so a user who uses crontab to send email reminders, procmail to forward interesting words from incoming emails, or a free web-form-email-based pager program to get small messages from friends gets all that functionality for free (with their paid cell phone contract from AT&T and some ingenuity). It's better for the company to stick to proprietary communications solutions completely under their control, so as to be able to charge for each bit they allow to reach you. Oh yeah, they also need to convince you that the tried and true, effective, standard, indispensable and ubiquitous thing called email is a niche market.
    In the interests of full disclosure, I wrote the pager url above, and my dad used to work for AT&T. I'm reluctantly willing to endure the onslaught of weird messages to my cellphone (user=Peter only - please do not harrass my other users who don't opt for anonymity) for the opportinity to share and stress test my free pager service. Better yet, create an account for yourself or friends and harrass them instead.

  24. As an owner of the pictured RIM device by shepd · · Score: 1

    I must say it was extremely useful, but lacking important features (at the time I was using it a few years ago) that anyone "cool" enough to own one of these devices needed. Like, for example, a not crappy web browser, and ssh support, and the ability not to crash weekly.

    Oh, and lets not forget the outrageous usage fees, that continue today. If you write somewhat lengthy emails, the device costs about $1 per email (450 words) to use on the cheapest plan. If you're willing to pay $50 a month for email (not many are) it's unlimited. Perhaps AOL wasn't so pricey, I bought my service from Rogers AT&T.

    The service costs for these have to be slashed by about 95% before they become popular. Otherwise, SMS is eating their market alive.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:As an owner of the pictured RIM device by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I still have one of those horrible devices, because we're required to have it at work. At first, I thought it was really useful, but after a while I grew to think of it as useless, and later just a pain to have.

      The device itself is horrendously overpriced: it's just an embedded 386-based handheld running WinCE. So not only does it not have enough horsepower to do anything besides text messaging, it's running WinCE so it crashes all the time. It's really annoying when you're typing an email and it spontaneously reboots itself. For such a low-tech device, it cost our company $350. And then the service is $50/month per device.

      On top of this, there were all kinds of problems when they first set us up with them; the devices didn't work for weeks while they got all the problems sorted out with the Exchange servers. Real smart: make your devices only interface to MS's unreliable email servers. Even better, MS is competing directly with RIM in the wireless messaging field, and since MS controls the underlying software, guess who's going to have an advantage?

      By contrast, I can get a color-screen mobile phone for under $100 now, and the service is only $40/month. Unlike Blackberry, which only does text messaging, and only works in large metro areas, my cellphone lets me talk, and works everywhere in the country. My cellphone also has an application to synchronize with my calendar at work if I wanted to use that. So why would I want to pay a premium for a Blackberry?

      I'm glad I'm not the one paying for this crappy thing.

    2. Re:As an owner of the pictured RIM device by Cebu · · Score: 1

      The RIM 950 does not run Windows CE -- it runs a custom proprietary operating system, which was developed, in house. If you don't believe it then read a bit:
      Operating System API Developer's Guide for Blackberry 2.5 This atrociously incorrect fact aside, I would have to say that this post happens to be somewhat ill informed on several counts.

    3. Re:As an owner of the pictured RIM device by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      You work for RIM, right?

    4. Re:As an owner of the pictured RIM device by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's what I was wondering.
      I could be wrong about the embedded OS, but when I had to update the software on it (using a horrible Windows-only utility that connected through a serial port; apparently USB is too advanced for RIM), I sure saw a lot of .dll files indicative of a Microsoft OS. So if it really is an in-house OS, they sure like to follow MS conventions: 8+3 filenames, .dll extensions, etc. And the fact that it crashes all the time.

      Of course he never bothered to address my most important points, those of pricing and availability, just saying it was "full of inaccuracies". I know what these things are costing our company; I'm certainly not making that up. And when you compare it to any half-decent cellphone, it just doesn't compare. Why should text messaging cost so much more than a phone?

      What's even funnier is when you go to a cellphone store and look at their combination PDA/cellphone offerings. You get things from Handspring and others with big color screens, ability to run Java apps, etc. And then there's the RIM, which has a black-and-white screen, can't run any serious software (kinda hard when you're stuck with a 386!), and costs more than all the others! What kind of sucker would buy from this pathetic company?

  25. Re:Actually, this is kind of a point of frustratio by marcsiry · · Score: 1

    To me, wireless e-mail is liberating.

    You can still answer your e-mail at your convenience, but now you can do it at the coffee shop. Or sitting on a park bench, you know, outside.

    If your fear is the expectation that your managers want you to answer e-mails immediately when outside the office, I would say that those expectations are the problem, not the technology.

    I rarely answer my cellphone unless the caller ID displays the number of someone I want to talk to right then. Similarly, I don't answer IMs unless I feel like it... how is the sender to know whether or not I'm actually at my computer?

    I think anything that give me more choice is a good thing. The technology itself allows that choice, but it's my responsiblity to manage my relationships to allow me to take advantage of it.

    --
    Marc Siry || interactive media professional, motorcycle enthusiast ||
  26. the problem by bongobongo · · Score: 2, Funny

    the main problem is the name.

    "HEY, RIM ME TONIGHT, WILL YA? WE'LL HOOK UP."

    so much embarassment.

  27. RIM is perfectly normal by Hao+Wu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is AOL caving in to social norms? There are millions of people who like RIM. They RIM every day almost. It is nothing to be ashamed of.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  28. Just a small US niche by agent+dero · · Score: 1

    "Wireless email is a rather small niche"

    I currently live in Germany, where it has become the latest cool thing to be wireless

    Kids that have hardly hit puberty ask for Cell Phones with intergrated Digital Cameras, so they can send pictures to friends in the middle of class, or where ever.
    Meanwhile their parents go into the T-Mobile store and check out the latest phone/wireless devices where they can check e-mail anywhere, or surf the web.

    Anyways, who wants to be in the office reading e-mail, when they can be at a drunken soccer game reading e-mail.
    -----------

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
  29. "AOL" Communicator by destinyland · · Score: 1
    AOL's device was just a re-branded Blackberry.

    No matter how many times they shouted "AOL Communicator," no one took the bait.

    ---
    Destiny-land.

    The happiest blog on earth.

  30. I have one by cfoster611 · · Score: 1

    It's pretty sweet if your a old AOL user, but wickedly expensive. I use it to write simple (can't spell check or html format) emails and do a ton of instant messaging. Its better for instant messaging then my Treo, since the keys are bigger and the connection is presistent. The battery lasts forever, and the pager network coverage is very good. A great thing for bus/car IM communication. The AOL MC is pretty small, plus built like a tank (well, aganst coffee and soda).

    While that deal for a sidekick looks good, as does the sidekick, the thing looks too big, and expensive for my tastes.

    --
    --- Kicking the Cheat since late 2002
  31. No, no, no... by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

    Danger is it's middle name.

    --
    Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
  32. Re:Actually, this is kind of a point of frustratio by subreality · · Score: 1

    Well, that's what I said. I don't have a problem with the technology. I like the technology. I have a problem with the people who don't understand it.

  33. Well....Yes, there is. by OwnerOfWhinyCat · · Score: 1

    But there isn't really much bandwidth available in the 100khz band.

    Even if you use cool techy modulations that give you ~100% return on bandwidth, and you decide to trash the full 90khz-110khz band, that gives you 20,000 bits per second to divide between the all the water craft on the Pacific ocean.

    Even if you were allowed to trash an ungodly chunk of the nearby spectrum say 100khz-400khz, that would give you a max. transmit rate of 300kbits per sec. or 6 dialup modems worth of bandwidth for all the ships in the Pacific.

    Returning the signal is the other snaglette in the design. This site has the details. The transmitters are large/heavy/expensive and transmit at powerlevels in 11 Kilowatt to 1.2 MegaWatt range. You can figure on at least double that amount of power being consumed in operation.

    The only neat data application I came up with for this would be to trash the smaller amount of bandwidth (20kbits) and put compressed copies of AP news out all over the world. The cost of adding the necessary microcontroller decode mechanism to a radio would be small, and you could get news, with pictures and maps, and weather system data. Your Grundig Databoy could keep the last 7 days worth of news for your to browse on a little LCD at your leisure regardless of sat. coverage and with no antenna to point. I supposed it's kind of like the data version of shortwave radio, only the fact that it's data means you don't have to listen at specific times (maybe like Tivo for shortwave).

  34. Re:Why a small niche? Too much email maybe? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Opera M2, anyone (ok, so I don't know if it's on cell phones yet, but...)

  35. Not it isnt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sidekick is great, but too bulky for your average Joe. It's too bulky for me too, to be honest, so I just suffer with my otherwise very excellent Samsung S105 cell phone, which nominally lets me monitor incoming emails. The most promising models I've seen are the upcoming SPH-I500 (as in here) and similar phone-form-factor Palm PDAs, which come very close to what I want. Add one of those newfangled laser-keyboard devices, and you've got a winner IMHO. And PLEASE stop sticking cameras on every phone.

    No, it isn't took bulky. Its your fault you must be stupid. Try being less stupid and fat. Then you will see that it is you that are bulky not the quarter pound phone.

  36. soda pop mail by E1v!$ · · Score: 1


    Simple, easy works with pop and imap,, and possible on almost every verizon phone currently sold.

    I have no idea why wireless email would be a small niche. What else have you got to do on the toilet?

  37. Re:Why a small niche? Too much email maybe? by louissypher · · Score: 1

    As a former "crackberry" (both "Internet edition" and "Corporate edition") user I feel qualified to reply.

    Spam is no more a problem for mobile email than it is on the desktop. Procmail and things such as SpamAssassin work. All mail is forwarded to one of RIM's email servers and forwarded to the pager. I could be very selective about what email was sent to me wirelessly.

    --
    www.bleepyou.com