Slashdot Mirror


Mars and the History of Antacids

An anonymous reader writes "NASA's retrospective today on the 1976 Mars Viking mission describes the first probe to orbit another planet, and the first biology experiments based on soil sampling. Program managers maintained a dynamic 'worry list', which included a 1970's computer that opened like a wireframe book. The all-important biology experiments could not be tested prior to launch, then lightning struck the probe components (at Kennedy's Explosive Safe Area Building)."

58 comments

  1. Not very lucky by tuluvas · · Score: 0, Funny

    That is not very lucky. I wonder what the chances of that happening are! can't be very big chances. I wonder though if they where being literal when they said lighting struck it?

    1. Re:Not very lucky by Professor+D · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Read the article carefully. Lightning struck the _building_. The area around Kennedy is pretty much flat IIRC, with just NASA buildings standing up tall in the middle of nowhere. I imagine lightning strikes are not uncommon.

      I'm surprised they dont' have massive faraday cages around certain areas in those buildings though. The idea of having a multi-billion dollar experiment ruined by EMP from a close-call stray bolt of lightning would scare me more than the bolt itself.

    2. Re:Not very lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The idea of having a multi-billion dollar experiment ruined by EMP from a close-call stray bolt of lightning would scare me more than the bolt itself.

      Not as much as how little a person who calls himself "Professor D" knows about science scares me.

    3. Re:Not very lucky by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      EMP from a close-call stray bolt of lightning

      EMP's (such as those from nuclear weapons) can cause fairly dangerous inductive currents in metal objects. Electrical arcs through the air (lightning) cause very little EM radiation, which in turn causes negligible inductive currents. Notice how lightning causes just a little pop on an AM radio? That's the EMP from the lightning amplified and it's barely audible, much less dangerous.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  2. Why the Viking mission was accepted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA managers found a way to convince the goverment to fund this mission: they told Bush that the martians are developing weapons of mass destruction. They have reliable intelligence: a complete report from secret agent Herbert G. Wells.

    1. Re:Why the Viking mission was accepted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nah. They just send a huge big horde of guys 'round to the White House screaming "What's in your wallet?!"

      Why do you think that they're called the Viking missions?

    2. Re:Why the Viking mission was accepted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought those guys were supposed to be Scottish?

    3. Re:Why the Viking mission was accepted by frostgiant · · Score: 1

      It was a little more funny when Leno said that last night on the Tonight Show.

  3. What the heck? by Faust7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read the article and didn't see TUMS mentioned anywhere.

    1. Re:What the heck? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      It breifly mentioned that the stress of the deadline resulted in some taking antacids.

    2. Re:What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of literalness is considered a clinically classic schizoid symptom: like a rolling stone gathers no moss --should refer to a rock.

  4. Hot Nasa engineer by mad44 · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.astrobio.net/articles/images/computer_t est.jpg

    1. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by Faust7 · · Score: 1

      Mary Tyler Moore meets Marilyn Quayle. I dunno.

    2. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by mad44 · · Score: 1

      Me thinks she was causing all this trouble... The other engineers were distracted and had difficulty in concentrating to their work.

    3. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by mhesseltine · · Score: 2, Informative

      And, quick HTML lesson: <a href="http://www.astrobio.net/articles/images/comp uter_test.jpg">Hot NASA engineer</a> Becomes

      Hot NASA engineer

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    4. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 0

      until you do the math and realize how old she must be now. Unlike you, i'm not into granny gang bangs :P

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    5. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by dafoomie · · Score: 1

      I didn't know Lt. Uhura worked for NASA. I guess she really is that old.

    6. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by mhesseltine · · Score: 1
      until you do the math and realize how old she must be now. Unlike you, i'm not into granny gang bangs :P

      While the phrase "granny gang bangs" made me laugh, I just wanted to help the parent poster with their mad HTML skills.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    7. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      She's really a secratary. She dropped a fake eyelash in that big machine-whatever it is.

      She's using her steno pen move the circut board thingies becasue her boss told her not to touch them because of the static electricity.

      When she's done looking for the eyelash, she's going to sit back down at her transcription machine and hope her boss notices her low cut blouse.

      --
      Huh?
    8. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't she look a bit like michael jackson?

    9. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      If you can do the math to find out how old she is, you're already in the advanced stages of trekocitus. I suggest you consult a physician.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    10. Re:Hot Nasa engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whereaZ I simply suggesst that j00... ... H I T T H A T S H I T !!

      naturally, i can't imagine you don't agree.

  5. Check out the babe testing that computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thankfully, hairdos miniaturized along with the computers.

    1. Re:Check out the babe testing that computer by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, hairdos miniaturized along with the computers.

      Maybe she touched something high voltage, but did not want to tell her supervisor, so explained it off as a new hairdoo.

      I don't think they would let people on planes these days with hair like that. You can hide a lot of WMD in there. The hairspray fumes alone would put the pilot to ZZZZ-land.

      Hmmmm. I wonder if her *other* hair is big also. A "Fro Below" perhaps?

    2. Re:Check out the babe testing that computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. She is married...
      Err, rather, she was married.
      How old would she be?

  6. Is it just me... by BlackTriangle · · Score: 0

    Or was that the most inocherent article write-up I've ever seen? I could just be really tired so I'm sending this question out to the bots.

  7. very short article by Artifex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing meatier than the summary in the body of it, either.

    History of antacids? Whatever. There's nothing especially finger-biting or stomach-churning mentioned in the text, except for a picture of a woman sticking "magnetic wires" "the size of a human hair" into an early computer with circuit boards that swing down - the "wireframe book," apparently.

    I'd have loved to have read about how difficult it was to keep materials from being contaminated with dust (shed skin flakes), etc., before launch, or how they decided to shield the circuitry from radiation, and what kinds of weight tradeoffs came up, etc.

    But the huge "problems list" section, which takes roughly a third of the article, actually doesn't detail problems, but just things like how the list was made, and how nobody would get in trouble for adding things to the list, and other yay-team filler.

    Overall, the whole thing reads like a one-sheet poster for a cheap hands-on museum display. Very disappointing.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:very short article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is a serialized version of a 500 page book. Not sure a single one-page mission summary in one chunk would load in your browser all at once...They say it is introductory, with no yay-team in 'not testable'

    2. Re:very short article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then do us a favor and paste it since it appears to be slashdotted already.

  8. That's what you think! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Meanwhile all the hair that fell into the computer, after being struck by lightning, and the martian conditions, has grown and bred.

    Beware the Giant Hairballs of Mars!

  9. Is it just me by coolmacdude · · Score: 2

    or does that picture remind you of one of the possible unpleseant results of nausea?

    --

    -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
  10. ok, posting since you think it's slashdotted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This comes from the "printer-friendly version" - URL given again at the end. No editing or reformatting, except to remove the dotted lines that Slashdot rejected as "junk characters":

    The 1976 Mars Viking mission involved the first probe to orbit another planet, and the first biology experiments based on soil sampling. Program managers maintained a dynamic 'worry list', which included a 1970's computer that opened like a wireframe book.

    Mars: History of Antacids
    The milestone launch of NASA's latest Mars mission--called Spirit-- provides the impetus to revisit the remarkable journey of the earliest martian missions. Excerpts from the lively debates that took place prior to the 1976 Viking missions give immediacy and perspective on both the rewards and challenges that the Red Planet offers. In this and forthcoming issues, Astrobiology Magazine is pleased to commemorate the descriptions offered in the words of then mission contemporaries. NASA historians have compiled these notes in their five-hundred page edition of: On Mars: Exploration of the Red Planet. 1958-1978 (NASA HQ SP-4212).

    The Problems List
    Project Manager Jim Martin began the Viking Top Ten Problems list in the spring of 1970 to give visibility to problems that could possibly affect the launch dates.

    The robotic arm of the Viking 2 Lander extends to collect a sample of soil for analysis. Click to enlarge.
    Credit:NASA.

    Viking project directive no. 7, issued 4 October 1971, codified the concept: "It is the policy of the Viking Project Office that major problems will be clearly identified and immediately receive special management attention by the establishment of Top Ten problems list."

    To qualify for this dubious distinction, the problem had to be one that seriously affected "the successful attainment of established scientific and/or technical requirements, and/or the meeting of critical project milestones, and/or the compliance with project fiscal constraints."

    Anyone associated with the Viking project could identify a potential priority problem by defining the exact nature of the difficulty and forming a plan and schedule for solving it. When Martin made an addition to his list, a person in the appropriate organization was charged with solving the problem, and someone in the Viking Project Office monitored his progress. Weekly status reports were datafaxed from the field to Langley.

    At Martin Marietta, William G. Purdy, vice president and general manager of the Denver Division-through Albert J. Kullas and later Walter Lowrie, his project directors-sent weekly status bulletins on the lander's top problems, since that system seemed to have the greatest number of difficult components and subsystems.

    In the spring of 1972, Martin told Cortright he hoped the supervisors of employees who had one of their tasks assigned to the top 10 list would not be penalized. Martin, not wanting a stigma attached to identification of a problem, was concerned that at Martin Marietta assignment of a problem might "automatically be considered as a mark of poor performance" when promotions or raises were given. Generally, the nature of the crucial problems was so complex that punishing one individual would not solve the problem.

    As with the gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer and the biology instrument, the novelty of the technological task was often the source of the trouble. Some problems seemed to stay on the manager's worry list forever. Others made repeat performances.

    White patches of frost on the ground are visible behind the Viking 2 Lander. Click to enlarge.Credit: NASA.

    The first flight-model computer was delivered to Martin Marietta in April 1974, nine months late according to the original schedule.
    Faith, Testing Fate
    Continuous monitoring of the subcontractor's troubles was rewarded, however, in late 1974 when the computers were finally ready for delivery. On 15 January, Jim Martin received the following message from Walt Lowrie at Martin Marietta:

    "Oh

    1. Re:ok, posting since you think it's slashdotted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Everytime I tried to connect to the page i got a 404.

  11. Its not just you by harborpirate · · Score: 1


    The "author" is clearly going for the slashdot story obfuscation award.

    Either that or someone has written a slashdot story submission bot that posts the same article over and over using slightly different language each time. A bot which apparently needs some major tweaking.

    --
    // harborpirate
    // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    1. Re:Its not just you by MrOrn · · Score: 1
      slashdot story submission bot that posts the same article over and over...which apparently needs some major tweaking

      Don't say that about Taco!

  12. Not the first by jfoust · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article claims that Viking "involved the first probe to orbit another planet", but this is incorrect. Mariner 9 went into orbit around Mars in November 1971, just days ahead of the USSR's Mars 2 and Mars 3 spacecraft. There was also Mars 5 in early 1974 and Venera 9 and Venera 10, two Soviet Venus orbiters, in late 1975.

    1. Re:Not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Anderson accepted, to a degree, that 'one can argue that the first mission to Mars should have biological emphasis,' but the realities were 'that the biological and organic experiments were not ready when the payload was selected, are not ready now, and probably will not be ready in 1975.' First here

    2. Re:Not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the reference must be to the first orbiter and lander (probe) in combination. That was a big debate then, and now, since this has become the standard way of doing planetary exploration (until Pathfinder). But ESA's Beagle lander is going to run into a lack of bandwidth since its orbital configuration has to piggy-back on the JPL Mars Exploration Rovers and various orbiters. Either way, Viking was so much more complex than anything tried before. Its rocket-fired landing is still pretty much a very difficult thing to pull off successfully. Viking scientists were surprised at the rockiness of where they landed--and the risks.

    3. Re:Not the first by jfoust · · Score: 1

      I believe the reference must be to the first orbiter and lander (probe) in combination.

      Mars 2 and Mars 3 were orbiter/lander combos. Not very successful ones, though...

    4. Re:Not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do mention imagery problems with Mariner 9. So it is a lander that makes the job especially difficult--even today. Amazing they got a rocket to go into that boulder field. One right landing pad mis-step and the thing turns over. Must have been heroic efforts or beginner's luck.

  13. first? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I wonder if that lady is making the first laptop or "notebook" computer.

  14. "book" computer by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sort of gives a whole new meaning to the term "memory pages" now doesn't it?

    Especially as those "hair thin wires" are being threaded through the donut-shaped magnetic cores that made up the computer's RAM. (one donut per bit! Ain't core-memory fun?)

    Progress is the process of making yesterday's innovations obsolete.?

    --
    What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
  15. Dear "Anonymous Reader": Stay Anonymous, Please by reallocate · · Score: 1

    There's a really good reason for this "anonymous reader" to stay anonymous.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  16. Mating and the Mars-bound hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    The article ends with this juicy bit of information:
    Viking orbiter l, and Viking lander capsule 1 were mated for the first time on 8 March.

    Why do they leave us in the dark? Were they able to get the orbiter and lander to sucessfully mate in captivity? Did they have twins? Where are they now?
  17. Full text available on-line by starsong · · Score: 5, Informative
    The article's annoyingly short, but the book it references (On Mars: Exploration of the Red Planet. 1958-1978) is available for free download via the web. The Top Ten problems list is in chapter 8.

    You can find a huge selection of other NASA-related books (including charts, diagrams and pictures) here.

  18. Pages of Memory! by vtechpilot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its that very contrution technique shown in those pictures why memory is sometimes refered to as 'pages'.

    --
    Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    1. Re:Pages of Memory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn I cant spell.

  19. Biology platform was not tested! by SysKoll · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The one really interesting item in this otherwise mundane article is the revelation that the biology experiment platform was delivered too late to be adequately tested.

    This gives a new credibility to the scientists that are challenging the results of the Viking lander biological experiments. Basically, we cannot even be sure these instruments were performing as designed.

    So if the ESA and NASA probes send results that contradict Viking's in some way, nobody should be surprised.

    Little green men haven't been ruled out yet! -:)

    -- SysKoll
    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  20. Aha! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the lighning strike is the reason that the data about life were inconclusive. Either there is life but Voyager decided to hide it from us, or Voyager was detecting its own newly alive self. I learned about this stuff from a documentary movie called "Short Circuit."

    --
    This space available.
  21. third option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the viking became sentient and remanmed itself voyager after watching the star trek motion picture

  22. That answers everything by enos · · Score: 1
    http://www.astrobio.net/articles/images/computer_t est.jpg

    No wonder the space program costs so much! We've got Micheal Jackson doing the dirty work!

    --
    boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse