Slashdot Mirror


Wireless LAN Equipment Shipments Up

MrBounce writes "Worldwide shipments of wireless local-area network equipment increased by 120 percent in 2002 from a year ago. So who are the current market leaders in this field?"

47 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. So? by mrklin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Worldwide population is also up in 2003 and we don't want to know who the most prolific producer is either.

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worldwide population is also up in 2003 and we don't want to know who the most prolific producer is either.

      Utah

    2. Re:So? by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Funny
      Worldwide population is also up in 2003 and we don't want to know who the most prolific producer is either.
      Why, it's FB-, of course.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  2. Wireless by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if the IP over avian carrier rfc would be included as a wireless protocol.

    1. Re:Wireless by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well... Maybe not pidgeons, Swallows though... What is the bandwidth of an unladen african swallow?

  3. Security? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So what percent of them have WEP disabled and SSID-broadcast enabled by default? Can I now wardrive to find 120% more open APs? Ironically, Microsoft branded routers are some of the few that do have WEP enabled out of the box.

    But these shipment numbers made sense. I bought both a wireless router and AirPort card for my iBook this year.

    1. Re:Security? by thegameiam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      it's funny - there are two approaches to Wireless:

      1) try to create wired-equivalent security, with WEP, et. al.
      This usually results in "security" which can be cracked by a persistent teenager in a car in under about 20 minutes.

      2) leave everything "open" and make sure that all security is host/application based. Treat the network as "untrusted"
      Personally, this is where I stand: I think that it works better, and people don't get any unrealistic impressions about the security of their connections.

      So I run a WISP which is built upon the latter model, in Washington DC. If someone wardrives and snoops some internet for an hour, fine! pleas don't attack the network itself, but feel free to surf the web :)

      -David Barak

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    2. Re:Security? by mhore · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So what percent of them have WEP disabled and SSID-broadcast enabled by default? Can I now wardrive to find 120% more open APs? Ironically, Microsoft branded routers are some of the few that do have WEP enabled out of the box.

      This is something I've been wondering ... I just don't know the answer. At home, I enabled WEP and disabled SSID-broadcast. I don't have much faith in WEP, but it's better than nothing, right? Anyway, with SSID-broadcast off, is my WLAN essentially invisible? Or could somebody "see" the packets still, and know something was there?

      Mike.

      --

      Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    3. Re:Security? by pantherace · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disabling SSID essentially only means that 100% listeners can't see it if someone isn't using it. However if someone is, then they can. SSID and WEP really have some big security holes. IPsec is very good compared to it. For SSID, if someone sees you (re)connect once it's lost, and can lead to breaking wep quite easily.

    4. Re:Security? by thegameiam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But why? the added overhead and trouble involved in WEP and no-broadcast SSID would make a casual user think that it's "safe" and therefore would be more likely to transmit private data over the network than having it wide-open will.

      When a user signs on, all they have to do is install a card, and they're up. They understand that snoopers are out there, and that they will try to swipe their data.

      Do you really think that WEP would add anything at all? c'mon, really?

      Regarding Godel, he was a mathmatician who showed how any formal system must be either incomplete or inconsistent. Thus the A and Not-A comment. My assertion is that you can either secure the wireless portion or not. "securing" the wireless portion makes users think that they're getting something, which is not the case.

      -David Barak

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  4. Rhyming headlines by donutz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Equipment Shipments?

    What other rhyming headlines can we expect?

    Stouter Routers available soon
    Software Can Plan your WLAN
    Take a look at this notebook?

    Name your suggestions!

    1. Re:Rhyming headlines by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, don't mocko taco.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Rhyming headlines by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anybody want a peanut?

  5. Re:slashdotted by retto · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cisco announced an agreement to buy Linksys a cheap whore

    Why can't my company make agreements like that! We just get boring ol' stock and cash deals.

  6. Details here .. by vivek7006 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Worldwide shipments of wireless local-area network equipment increased by 120 percent in 2002 from a year ago."

    RIAA has attributed this increase to an increasing sharing of music by *thieves* on the internet. SCO is claiming that the increase in the sale of wireless LAN equipment is primarily due to linux. Ans since linux has SCO's IP, SCO is planning to sue all the manufactures of wireless LAN.

  7. Innovators pay the price of leadership by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Boy, given that Apple was shipping wireless on their computers back in 1999, it is interesting to see that they don't seem to be represented here. It could be due to a small market share I suppose, but Apple has paid the price for leadership again and again by innovating and then everyone else jumping on board.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Innovators pay the price of leadership by jafiwam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't you mean "Apple purchasers have paid twice the price for leadership again and again"

      I sure wish I could modify my settings to never again see Apple-weenies prostelizing about their choice in computers. They, as a collective group irritate the piss out of me.

      Come to market at the wrong time, and it's still the wrong time. Even if it is ahead of everybody else.

  8. In other news..... by acidrain69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Production of 2003 Volkswagon Beetles is up infinity% from last year! Incredible!

    Wireless is new. Since it didn't flop, of course they are going to manufacture more. Who cares if there was twice as much manufactured as last year? WHY IS THIS NEWSWORTHY??

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    1. Re:In other news..... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      WHY IS THIS NEWSWORTHY??

      Because in an economy where technology has been struggling until recently, it's nice to see increased demand and spending for something, even if it was widely expected. Plus, seeing Linksys rise to the top was a bit interesting, as well as the blurb on Cisco buying Linksys. Also, I appreciated the list of other "top" vendors, as it gives me some to compare in the coming months. And finally, everybody was complaining about the hourly SCO updates. /. editors had to put something else in. :-)

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  9. have a look at Nortel by SubtleNuance · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nortel has some really good product: here, their VOIP handsets/desktop phones and software-based-voip-phones are *very* cool... coupled with a 802.11x AP, it is VERY COOL. Ipaq + 802.11x CF Nic + Nortel Software == wirless phone in your office.

    1. Re:have a look at Nortel by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

      $25 will do the same thing.

      Nope.

      That device wireless links you to a POTS line.

      The Nortel (and related) boxes wireless link you to VoIP on an internet portal.

      Use the 802.11x handset anywhere you've got an access point that lets you hit the net.

      Plug the IP desk set in ditto with your wired LAN. Move offices by unplugging it and carrying it, rather than having the $400/hr consultant come reconfigure the PBX. Heck: Move to the branch office on the other coast, or take an "office phone" home and plug it into the hub on your DSL modem.

      Think "free long-distance" and "cellphone" and "no air-time", vs. "wireless extension phone" with an invisible cord to your phone jack.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  10. In related news.... by bflong · · Score: 5, Funny

    In related news, Pringles shipments were up by %110.

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    1. Re:In related news.... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In related news, Pringles shipments were up by %110.

      Whomever unfairly moderated this Offtopic clearly doesn't understand wireless, yagi antennas, and/or humor.

      Of course, the original poster doesn't understand postfix notation either.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  11. Meanwhile... by macshune · · Score: 3, Funny

    Scientists are still trying to figure out how businesses can make money from selling access wi-fi networks.

  12. The Future of Wireless by eniacx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you don't know what a Mesh Network is, you should read up on it. There are some very cool applications.

    You can fly in a helicopter at 300 mph+ and sustain an Internet Connection.
    City governments are also using this technology to deploy cameras around their cities.

    Any kind of technology is always scary when government gets ahold of it. However, I still have some questions about it's security though.

    http://www.meshnetworks.com

  13. And This Is Important Because... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Funny
    And this is important to get posted to Slashdot because...?

    a) It's a nice break from SCO stupidity and bashing
    b) It's a nice break from Microsoft stupidity and bashing
    c) There was still a site in the world that hadn't been Slashdotted yet
    d) None of the above
    e) All of the above

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  14. Interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A fellow grad student and I got talking about this at our university's wireless lab ...

    Most current wireless scheme assume sparse usage concentrations. As more and more people start using these devices, interference will increase markedly and reduce performance for all. Just think what would happen if every single person in your appartment or neighbourhood had a wireless network setup? We would see a 15-50% degradation in wireless bandwidth!

    Not to mention other devices operating in the 2.4Ghz unregulated spectrum like microwave ovens and those damn cordless phones!

  15. Scary... by clausiam · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just finished placing my online order for various Linksys Wireless equipment, then surf over to /. and the top story is "Wireless LAN Equipment Shipments Up...top vendor is Linksys". Man, those internet tracking and market analysis systems are getting too advanced now... :-)

    1. Re:Scary... by thegameiam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's funny - I built my WISP out of Linksys Wireless-G products largely because of cost, and I've been fairly satisfied. HOWEVER: there are two fundamental features missing:

      1) nothing acts like a repeater (grrrr)

      2) I want an AP/Bridge combo, where it can do both at the same time! (I guess that's really a lot like the first request, but dammit, it's needed!)

      Of course, just after I purchased everything, they came out with a WET54...

      -David Barak

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  16. Re:slashdotted by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 3, Funny

    Would you really want a cheap whore? It's kinda like buying a high milage cheap car... there's no telling what you'll find under the seat... nevermind the gas tank or the tailpipe!

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  17. long distance wireless - much greater than 300 ft by leoaugust · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is probably a good time to create a current review of the long distance (>> 300 ft) Wireless solutions that are available in the market.

    Richochet is one http://www.ricochet.com/

    and another is Vivato http://www.vivato.net/

    What are the other ones in the market?

    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
  18. Not too hard to believe ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I know a two years ago that wireless was "too slow" and had "too many bottlenecks" and was "too insecure".

    Well in the last few years two out of the three major issues with wireless have been fixed. Plus now there's more widespread applications for wireless technology is amazing. Cause everything to communicate without drilling holes and running wires and it's all portable.

    Wireless (especially 802.11b) is in major universities, businesses, and homes all across america. It's "the new craze" get broadband and a wireless router along with a laptop and surf the net while outside, in your room, or wherever.

    For what people need networking for wireless usually is it 9 times out of 10 and it is far more acceptable and eye appealing than drilling holes and running wire everywhere. Plus it's cool to have a laptop with no wires surfin the net, still has a cool "wow" factor.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  19. Booming by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's just that wireless requires Big Company infrastructure. Make the Wireless big enough and perhaps it will be decentralized. Make it encrypted and everyone can/will use it.
    Make it so that no one wireless is the chokepoint and you will have redundancy that backbones can only dream about. And All this for FREE!

    --

    Sigs are dangerous coy things

  20. Re:In other news... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is technology. It moves *forward*.

    The hell it does - just look at Windows ME.

    --
    Beep beep.
  21. So really... by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cisco is 28% of wireless lan revenue since they own Linsys now =) I find it interesting what this says about the overall market, Cisco/Aironet which is the large enterprise leader slipped behind Linksys in revenue even though the typical Cisco/Aironet product costs ~8X what the typical Linksys product does, so small companies and consumers must be outbuying enterprises by around 8X =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  22. Apple is just too small a player in wireless by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    It could be due to a small market share I suppose, but Apple has paid the price for leadership again and again by innovating and then everyone else jumping on board.

    Not really. Remember Apple only has a small (5%) market share in computers to begin with and their wireless gear generally is only sold to people who have Macs. And not everyone who has a Mac uses the wireless so the population is even smaller. It's not really surprising they wouldn't be near the top given how popular 802.11b has become.

    Plus Apple doesn't make their own wireless gear. They OEM it from others. Lucent at one point (still?) was the maker of some of their stuff if I recall. They were innovative in using it but they never really were the technology innovators here. They were just smart enough to realize that it was useful ahead of almost everyone else.

    1. Re:Apple is just too small a player in wireless by DustMagnet · · Score: 3, Informative
      Plus Apple doesn't make their own wireless gear. They OEM it from others. Lucent at one point.

      Lucent changed to Orinoco and now Proxim, which surprise surprise is on the list.

      BTW, these Orinoco/Proxim cards are some of the best. Great range, good drivers (wardriving patches) and an external connector for even better range.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  23. Avian Carrier achttpd by macshune · · Score: 5, Funny

    SLASHDOT CITY--Slashdot.org has been brought up on animal cruelty charges because of an experiment involving the deaths of over 20,000 carrier pigeons.

    "We were just starting to test a new slashdot webserver using carrier pigeons. All of a sudden tens of thousands of anonymous cowards started posting, overwhelming the pigeons' bandwidth," said the Slashdot.org official on the condition of anonymity.

    The official said later that the pigeons somehow got malformed information (packets) and started crashing into each other, eventually resulting in their deaths.

    There were reports of a large, troll-like creature in the area as well, but so far those claims are unsubstantiated.


  24. This is better suited for fark.com by Agent+Deepshit · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Under the 'Cool' tag.

    Or in a press release.

  25. Much, MUCH greater than 300 feet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hell, I get my internet from a provider's tower over 4.5 MILES away from my house. I only have a lowly Linksys WET11 802.11b bridge too. Of course I also have a 24db parabolic reflector antenna on a 40 foot pole pointed back to the ISP's antenna, and good clear line-of-site between the two antennas. I generally get 11Mbps to their access point with 70% "signal quality" and 85-90% "signal strength".

  26. Re:Cost vs. Quality by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Linksys is at the top of the heap...there are plenty of companies that make better products

    My Linksys 802.11b router does everything I need it to do, cheaply and reliably. What more can one ask for in a non-cricical home system?

    focus more of quality rather than cost...after all, if they did, we wouldn't have to deal with Wal-Mart

    Since Wal-Mart doesn't manufacture what it sells, uses their buying power to get lower prices on the same items, and doesn't force you to shop there, I don't understand your rant.

    This message sent out through a Linksys router.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  27. Re:Cost vs. Quality by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I wish consumers would focus more of quality rather than cost...after all, if they did, we wouldn't have to deal with Wal-Mart anymore!

    Educated consumers do, provided that there isn't a huge difference in cost. If I can pick up Linksys for $99 or pay $299 for a "better" product, I'm going to lean toward the cheaper option. Although, it depends on what I'm looking for.

    BTW, since you're concerned about choosing the quality WLAN, do you know of a good comparative review of wireless products? I may be in the market for some more wireless stuff myself.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  28. Fast IR? by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe what you might want in this case is a "Fast IR" port/hub. I haven't seen anything much like this on PC's, but many brands of laptop have "Fast IR" (4Mbps) ports. I'm not sure what the latency on this is, but I'd imagine it might be better than WiFi. You can also build your own wireless serial adaptor, I used to have instructions for this but they are now lost.

    The trick would be connecting >2 persons via IR, which I guess would require an IR-hub of some sort - but I'm not sure where one could get something that. Maybe some enterprising /. geek could think of that.

  29. The future is not that bright by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Informative
    It is really hard for a newcomer to enter the Wi-Fi market right now. The wireless LAN market suddenly achieved saturation and started experiencing price wars even before it was fully developed and there was an 802.11 hotspot at every house.

    TechKnowledge claims that even though the shipment volumes will grow, the revenues from the wireless LAN sales will decline , since this market is currently experiencing oversupply.

    However, this is bonanza time for consumers and businesses, here are some quotes from the market report quoted above:

    The average price for a chip that enables connections for an 802.11b wireless LAN (WLAN), also known as Wi-Fi, was $16.06 in 2002, but that price will drop to $6.61 by the end of 2003.

    The price for chips based on the 802.11g standard is also expected to fall this year, from $18 per chip in 2002 to $9.68 by the end of 2003

  30. I'm wireless by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    My geek-wannabie of a neighbour just got WLAN installed. Time to cancel that xDSL subscription.

  31. The (current) downside of mesh nets: Don't scale. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately, the current implementations don't scale to the size of even the current internet - because they requre every node to know about every other (in case it needs to forward a packet).

    (Routing table explosions were what drove the switch from RIP to BGP in the first place.)

    They'll get there eventually. Meanwhile, imagine them as drops of mercury. When two touch they join. And when two equal-sized drops join, each "atom" (machine) in the big drop needs twice as much table space as it needed in the separate little drop.

    Now imagine them joining, and joining, and joining, until the whole world is covered by one big drop. Somewhere along the way the tables get too big for your handheld, VoIP phone, toaster, or what-have-you.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  32. Re:Leave it open and use a VPN by thegameiam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exactly. The overhead you spend on IPSec is probably about what you'd spend on WEP, and the difference is that IPSec actually works... :)

    -David Barak

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!