UK Govt Warned: Don't Buy GPL
JPMH writes "ZDNet is reporting that a UK IT industry body backed by Microsoft, IBM, Intel, BAE Systems and other high-tech heavyweights has urged the UK government not to commission open-source software, and particularly not software covered by the General Public License. According to Intellect, which lobbies for about 1,000 UK IT companies, the requirement of open-source licences for software funded by the government could have a negative impact on competition for contracts, the quality of the resulting software and even the confidentiality of government departments. In particular, Intellect recommends that the government drop the GNU General Public License (GPL), the licence upon which the GNU/Linux operating system is based, from its list of acceptable default licences for government-funded software, and steer clear of the GPL generally."
That which is free.
What should I do??
A study commissioned by the fox, today issued a strong warning against putting a lock on the henhouse. "Locks are dangerous things. They can pinch your fingers. They cause changes in behavior that are undesirable."
- For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat
Number of mentions of the word innovations per page is roughtly equivalent to the probability that this report was funded and ghost written by Microsoft.
Lets see: 3 mentions in 4 pages. MS probabilty factor - 75%.
Just because you are a member of a group does not mean you always have to agree with the majority.
I know. I'm an American.
"Provided by the management for your protection."
At least the KFC kernel is very stable, having been dead for some years now...oh wait, that's colonel!
So the interesting question is wheter fireing a missile containing a GPL'ed binary counts as distibution...
I would say not, since who you are distributing it to will not be in any position to demand to see the source code once the transaction has been completed.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'