Slashdot Mirror


PocketPC 2003 Reviewed

Sander Sassen writes "Prior to the official launch of the Microsoft PocketPC 2003 platform next Monday, Hardware Analysis puts an Asus MyPal a620 PocketPC to the test and details what new features PocketPC 2003 brings to the table and whether it is worth it to upgrade from 2002."

9 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Ipod Harddrive by Sh0t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why don't they make a pocket pc with the Ipod harddrive inside?

  2. Very cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I heard it's going to be the first handheld capable of playing DVDs too. I don't know if 400MHz is enough to do SVCD decoding, but I wouldn't be surprised if somebody comes up with a package for that too.

    I just wish somebody would add wireless networking to the things already like they did with the tablet PCs. Those are sweet.

    1. Re:Very cool. by SEGV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can already rip DVDs to a 250MB DivX that will fit on a 256MB flash card and play fine on a Pocket PC 2002 device. I like to watch Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon when I am bored.

      --

      --
      Marc A. Lepage
      Software Developer
  3. Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized? by SClitheroe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is PocketPC 2k3 Xscale optimized?

    That's really the million dollar question. PocketPC 2002 is not, and it's a real shame, because it hurts the performance of those 400mhz Xscale CPU's pretty badly.

  4. XHTML support? Yes! by donutz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a network connection will most likely also be used for web browsing Microsoft completely revamped the rendering architecture of the PocketPC Internet Explorer which not only speeds thing up considerably but also offers support for more internet standards. Standards that are now available in PocketPC 2003 are XHTML, CSS, HTML 4.0, JavaScript 5.5, WAP 2.0, WTLS, IPv6 and many more, which makes the PocketPC web browser compatible with the vast majority of websites found on the internet and intranets which often use some of the more exotic protocols.

    All I can say is ABOUT TIME! I don't even bother trying to do any web browsing on my Dell Axim X5 running Pocket PC 2002. It's just disgusting that they have an IE 3.x based browser running on something so new!

    I wonder if we'll see any upgrades to the browser for Pocket PC 2002, or if we will need to purchase a new device with 2003 on it. Let me guess...

  5. Toshiba e355 by gantrep · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just got a Toshiba e355 and like the article says, it includes windows media player 9. The biggest thing for me anyway, is that pressing the home button brings up Home Version 2.00 with a games tab, a programs tab, a main tab and a running tab. The running tab makes it much much easier to actually close programs. I haven't noticed much else different between 2003 and 2002(I used to have an HP1910 until it stopped syncing and Best Buy replaced it with this three days ago.)

    And for any wondering about the Toshiba e355, I can transfer files fine using Synce

    And here are some specs for it.

  6. Re:You mean Internet Explorer for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Instead of modding down, why don't the smartasses "In the Know" reply to the post with some facts as to why IE isn't standards compliant? Just because IE has a bunch of new junk that Mozilla, Netscape, and Opera can't see doesn't mean it isn't standards compliant. Flame the webmaster or Mozilla if you want new crap.

    I see this post coming up in meta mod. Expect my vote to be unfair.

  7. Re:Small and Big by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I agree. I can't wait to use a slower toolkit like .NET on a handheld. Troll me if you want, but I use WinCE/VS/VS.NET for a living, and it's true.

  8. Re:Palm to iPaq (student view) by lma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I disagree completely. I've got at least one of just about every PDA out there - several Palms, PocketPCs, even the Zaurus. Palm has a great collection of apps available, and it's much better at synchronizing with Outlook than is the PocketPC. PocketOutlook is awful compared to what's available on the Palm. Further, I get weeks of battery life out of my Palm. The one feature that I really like on PacketPCs is the way the file system appears under Windows as a USB hard drive. That one feature was almost enough to make me use the PacketPC for daily work over the Palm. But not quite. Larry