Slashdot Mirror


Apple's G5 Speeds Challenged

An anonymous reader was the first of a seemingly infinite stream of people to submit a URL to an argument that makes the case that the G5 isn't quite what Apple wants you to think of it. The evidence? Apple's own press material. Worth a read.

17 of 1,595 comments (clear)

  1. Think Different by corebreech · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and benchmark different too!

  2. I'm shocked, shocked, by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to find that people would use benchmarketing to make a product look better than it is!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:I'm shocked, shocked, by Surak · · Score: 4, Funny

      He probably works for nVidia. :)

  3. eh? by cfscript · · Score: 5, Funny
    Both Apple and Dell are guilty of using misleading prices. For example, Apple gives the price of the low-end G5 as "$1999", and the high-end G5 as "$2999". In other words, they have subtracted $1 from a $3000 computer to make it seem cheaper, which is absolutely ridiculous. This demonstrates that both Apple and Dell are willing to mislead people when stating their prices.

    translation :

    i am too stupid to round up.
    --
    Are you MORE than your SPINAL COLUMN?
  4. Really smart guy by T40+Dude · · Score: 5, Funny
    Both Apple and Dell are guilty of using misleading prices. For example, Apple gives the price of the low-end G5 as "$1999", and the high-end G5 as "$2999". In other words, they have subtracted $1 from a $3000 computer to make it seem cheaper, which is absolutely ridiculous. This demonstrates that both Apple and Dell are willing to mislead people when stating their prices.


    Mislead people ??? $2999 IS cheaper than $3000.
  5. Re:spl=troll by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 4, Funny

    He MAY have valid points but his credibility is zero.

    Ummm...this is /. you know.

    Are you new here?

    (yeah, yeah, pot, kettle, black)

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  6. Re:Quite by keiferb · · Score: 5, Funny

    And what's more, when you start running programs that use more than 2GB of data

    Oh, Please. We all know we'll never ever need more than 640k.

  7. Benchmarks...who cares? by beavis88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone who's followed the computer industry for more than a couple minutes knows that there are lies, damned lies, and benchmarks.

    Go use a machine, for tasks you'd typically perform -- that's the only benchmark that matters.

    But if you must assign a number to the size of your virtual phallus, by all means, benchmark away...

  8. Re: whatever by pigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well.. you can have my 8-bit commodore 64 for free.. so the bang for the buck is infinite..

  9. Re:whatever by nehril · · Score: 5, Funny
    this guy may have some points but he is whacked out:


    Misleading Prices

    Both Apple and Dell are guilty of using misleading prices. For example, Apple gives the price of the low-end G5 as "$1999", and the high-end G5 as "$2999". In other words, they have subtracted $1 from a $3000 computer to make it seem cheaper, which is absolutely ridiculous. This demonstrates that both Apple and Dell are willing to mislead people when stating their prices.


    Next crackpot, please.

  10. Re:Quite by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 5, Funny
    Damn straight. My Atari 800 XL has 64k of RAM, and it works just fine (well, it used to, anyway... it's inoperative now, but not because of the RAM). You could use a word processor, a spreadsheet, or even some genuinely kickass games like Lode Runner, Centipede and Miner 2049er on it. Therefore, it's obvious no one needs all these obscene amounts of RAM people have in their comps now. 64k was good enough for me then, and it should be just fine for all these spoiled brats now.

    Why, I remember how appalled I was when my friend had an Apple IIgs with 1 MB - 1 megabyte!!! - of RAM, a decade or so ago. What kind of hedonist needs that much? Bah.

    These damn kids today, with their gigabytes and their FireWire and their "rock 'n' roll" music and the hair and the clothes...

  11. best flame ever by Fishstick · · Score: 4, Funny

    I especially liked the hatemail at the end. This was my favorite:

    People that go to ivory league schools that live in trailers are a very low population, lets say 1% so since there are 99% of the people living in houses then you can clearly see that people that live in trailers are stupid, when compared to they're counter parts. Or put it this way, any finite number divided by infinity results in a number so small it does not exists. So any people that live in trailers that go to ivory league school you meet in passing are just figments of your imagination. Point is if you like Macintosh use it, if you don't then well don't use it.

    Heh. That sure dispels this guy's critique of Apple's benchmarks, eh?

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  12. Thank the Lord for SPL's Soapbox by jcsehak · · Score: 4, Funny

    "In other words, they have subtracted $1 from a $3000 computer to make it seem cheaper, which is absolutely ridiculous."

    Those lying fucking bastards. I've never seen that before in my life. Never - I repeat - never, have I seen a product priced at anything less than a perfectly round figure. I'm so glad I read spl's soapbox. I mean, I went to the Apple store, and saw that it was $1999, and I admit it, I said "I could afford this." But thanks to the philanthropy of spl, I was forced to examine it further. If you actually sit down and do the math, $1999 is not, in fact, a thousand dollars and a little more - no, innocent consumer! $1999 is nothing less than a dollar shy of $2000!

    --

    c-hack.com |
  13. Re:whatever by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, when I go to buy, say, a new processor, and one store has it for $199 and the other has it for $200, I'm going to buy the $199 for the sole reason of being able to answer "Oh, 100-something dollars" to my wife's question of "How much did that stupid thing COST?" instead of having to say "200 dollars".

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  14. Re:spl=troll by DrWhizBang · · Score: 4, Funny

    no, everyone copies with Xerox.

    --
    Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  15. What About the Most Important Benchmark? by Nintendork · · Score: 5, Funny
    How long does it take for a SETI@Home work unit to complete???

    -Lucas

  16. Re:spl=troll by quantum+bit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Neo: Whoa, deja vu.

    Trinity: What did you just say?

    Neo: Nothing, I just had a little deja vu.

    Trinity: What did you see?

    Cypher: What happened?

    Neo: Someone posted about Xerox, and then there was another post that looked just like it.

    Trinity: How much like it, was it the same post?

    Neo: Might have been, I'm not sure.

    Morpheus: Switch, Apoc.

    Neo: What is it?

    Trinity: Deja vu is usually a glitch in the Slashcode. It happens when they change something.

    Shamelessly stolen from an Anonymous Hero