Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Court Rejects Intel Electronic Trespass Charge

Posted by simoniker on from the get-orff-moi-server dept.

NearlyHeadless writes "The California Supreme Court reversed lower court rulings that ex-Intel employee Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi committed electronic trespass by sending e-mail to Intel employees, reports the San Jose Business Journal. E-mail has the same protection as other communication, according to the court's opinion, available here (PDF link)." We've covered Hamidi's case more than once in the past.

8 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. good... by goats_in_boats · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...now I can try this at the massive state gvmt where I work!

    1. Re:good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      "He ended up getting his job back."

      Those vindictive BASTARDS!

  2. HALT!!! by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your first post is considered tresspass by California state law. You will now be rounded up and sent to infinite detention at Gauntanamo Bay! TERRORIST!

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:HALT!!! by cshark · · Score: 2, Funny

      I confess, I posted... but I didn't do it on purpose. It was the one armed typist! yeah... that's it.... Typist of terror? That's got a ring to it.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

  3. Wow. Rational court decisions. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we hope the trend will continue?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  4. Umm... blacklist? by Prince_Ali · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does Intel lack the ability to block external e-mail addresses? Geez, I'm buying AMD next time!

    --
    Slashdotter are stupid and biased.
  5. Re:Gonna get sued... by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lugor, your post regarding the TV Brick in the Intel court case article consitutes electronic trespass.

  6. Re:Victory for Spammers? by instantkarma1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I total agree. We need to make sure we look at the big picture. Giving up free speech to fight spam would be a terrible long term trade-off. However, I would not be surprised if some politician, say a current republican administration official, tried to limit free speech under the very guise of stopping both Spam and Terrorism (there is a link, you know).