Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Court Rejects Intel Electronic Trespass Charge

Posted by simoniker on from the get-orff-moi-server dept.

NearlyHeadless writes "The California Supreme Court reversed lower court rulings that ex-Intel employee Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi committed electronic trespass by sending e-mail to Intel employees, reports the San Jose Business Journal. E-mail has the same protection as other communication, according to the court's opinion, available here (PDF link)." We've covered Hamidi's case more than once in the past.

2 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Re:slashdotted: karmaless reprint by PetWolverine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    +1 Informative and -1 Troll so far.

    Does nobody besides me think these altered "reprints" are +1 Funny?

    --
    I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  2. "Covered more than once" by suwain_2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We've covered Hamidi's case more than once in the past.

    Which begs the question, was its repeated coverage deliberate, or was it a duplicate?

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p