More on High-Altitude Balloonists
An anonymous reader writes "The Guardian reports on an attempt at the record for the highest balloon flight. 'A bag of helium the size of the Empire State building to challenge Nasa record.'" We had an article about them a few months ago.
With one of these balloons. They appear safe enough, and they have adequate lift capability. They are a bit slow on the takeoff, but... safety first right.
Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
The interesting thing, too me at least, is seeing
the curvature of the earth. When I was a functionally
check flight weapon systems officer for the F-4E some
years ago, I used to see the curvature of the Earth at
50,000 feet. And now, we didn't use pressure suits...
The blood would only boil if exposed to the outside. What is never mentioned is that the
body itself would keep the blood under pressure at least for a while so it wouldn't be a simple
case of bubbling in the veins , it would be a far more unpleasent case of blood leaking out from all orifices THEN boiling.
Remember that at most the pressure difference between inside and outside the body can only ever be 1 atmosphere which is equivalent to a
a scuba diver coming up from a 30 foot dive too fast. Yes it'll case problems but no the body won't explode or anything like that.
as an assist for a conventional rocket?
I wrote a letter to Aerostar, the largest commercial hotair balloon manufacturer in the States, about their largest model, the Aero 245 asking about maximum payload and altitude and I never heard back.
But I did find that they were only around 75 grand a piece. What I was wondering was if you took like five of those to say 40,000 feet towing a rocket and then launched from there, wouldn't you be able to get a lot more bang for your buck than from say a similar operation using a customized jet airliner that costs millions to modify and operate?
I mean this high altitude stunt stuff is cool and all, but I'm very curious as to why balloons can't be a practical element in launching satellites and such.
They're ascending at 1000ft/min with a balloon the size of the Empire State Building, which is as thin as a freezer bag. So one bird strike and they're done right?
According to the article the fabric is rather delicate - strong winds are enough to cancel the flight. I don't know whether or not this particular fabric is a design requirement but the way things are right now I don't think I'd want a rocket going off anywhere nearby.
This exploding human stuff is urban legend. I think there would be a certain amount of degassing in your veins which would give you a deadly case of 'the bends'
love is just extroverted narcissism
nasa say that this would not happen and that you can survive for upto a half a minute without ill effects. "You do not explode and your blood does not boil because of the containing effect of your skin and circulatory system. You do not instantly freeze because, although the space environment is typically very cold, heat does not transfer away from a body quickly."