Slashdot Mirror


Evangelizing OSS in the Caribbean

An anonymous reader writes "Here is an article on NewsForge regarding evangelizing OSS in the Caribbean. I'm wondering what others think of the impact efforts like this may have on software development jobs in the US. Is IT still a viable field to get into and if so will it last?"

45 of 280 comments (clear)

  1. Evangelizing OSS in the Carribean by kurosawdust · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got the perfect theme song: "No Windows, No Cry"

  2. oh yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    pasty-faced nerds roaming the streets of Kingston. I give 'em 5 minutes before they're robbed and hacked up with machetes.

  3. Re economics by Crashmarik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they can't afford office they sure as heck can't afford joint developent of free code with U.S. programmers.

    1. Re:Re economics by yintercept · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you checked the price of trinkets lately? I certainly can't afford trinkets on my software developers salary.

      I have not been on a cruise in the Carribbean, bu I suspect most trinkets have to be imported from China as the native labor is too expensive.

      Next question: Have you checked the price of Office in Trinidad? As I recall, many companies drop the price of their software depending on economic condiditions.

      Next question, what is the cut that the local sofware dealers gets when they sell Office Suite? Hmmm, that money seems to end up funding the software industry in Trinidad.

      The OSS is repeating the tired old slogan that anything involving money is evil, but the truth of the matter is that money is what makes a higher standard of living possible.

      It seems to me that a better goal would be to bring the third world into the mainstream economy, than to push false idealistic hopes that someday everything will be free.

    2. Re:Re economics by cmacb · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The OSS is repeating the tired old slogan that anything involving money is evil, but the truth of the matter is that money is what makes a higher standard of living possible."

      I have never seen any Open Source document claim that money is evil. In fact, the notion that Open Source has something to do with Communism, Socialism, or any other form of economic theory is a leap of reason no less mystifying to me than Cantor's dealings with infinity (as discussed on your web page).

      I happen to be a proponent of capitalism. The two deadliest things for capitalism are excessive government control of the flow of goods and services and excessive control of that flow by a few arbitrarily large businesses. having Standard oil control the flow of all oil in the United States was not good for capitalism, nor is it good to have one company corner the market on operating system and office automation software. That is particularly true (as the article points out) when that results in the creation of numerous closed standard formats for data.

      The money that should be spent on computers is for R&D in new technologies, including software. That R&D on the software side is happening at (a few) universities here, within companies using Open Source, and to a large extent in Europe. For the most part Microsoft is milking a cash cow and trying to figure out how to keep it giving milk. Examples of research on NEW technologies which you could at one time find at research.Microsoft.com seem to have been abandoned for the most part.

      AMD and the PowerPC give Intel enough competition to keep things healthy as far as hardware goes. Between the two monopolies, Intel and Microsoft I have a lot more respect for Intel, even though I wish competition were hotter sooner.

      Finally, having one company dominate software, and another company dominate hardware is not in the long term best interest of this country. As the article accurately states, Open Source represents not only an opportunity for poorer countries to catch up technologically without the need for large sums of money, but it will also result in the education of substantial numbers of their population in the computer sciences. Today we turn people out of grad schools with computer science degrees who think that installing Windows and compiling a C program is the pinnacle of their university experience. We have dumbed-down our curriculums drastically thanks to Microsoft and Windows and we are going to get (actually it is happening now) the crap kicked out of us by countries that did not become so obsessed with a single operating system.

      We will deserve it too. I just hope there are enough people here who will wake up so that we can get back in the race before WE become the third world nation of computing.

    3. Re:Re economics by Crashmarik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then you are using it and not developing it. Is this really so difficult to understand.

      I know there are I.T. companies that solve todays problems sometimg in the future, maybe but the poorer the environment the less that can be tolerated.

    4. Re:Re economics by Crashmarik · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was exactly my point. OSS is not going to be a savior. Trying to develop your own software isn't neccesesarily going to save anyones economy and in some cases could do serious damange. And in response to the topic question, No its not going to have much effect on the overall I.T. market unless you had a lot of sales to people that can't afford to buy your product.

  4. There will be jobs for good programmers, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The commercial, and particularly the retail, software industry is in big trouble from open source software. As software becomes a commodity, producing it will become less and less valuable to employers. Oddly, it still costs lots of money to create professional, polished consumer software, but the usually weak open source imitations are "good enough" for most people, or will be fairly soon. The real question is what happens when companies stop doing the basic research and innovation that open source developers rely on for ideas to copy?

    1. Re:There will be jobs for good programmers, but... by RALE007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What makes you think open source developers only copy ideas? Part of the article (you read it right?) had to do with cabilities of open source software that are unmatched by anything else.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    2. Re:There will be jobs for good programmers, but... by SunPin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Operating systems should be free and open. Software should not. This is honest dissent, not a troll so moderators need to find someone else to mod down.

      Having Windows controlled by Microsoft instead of the public allows them to wrestle companies to their knees. On the other side, the open source movement has as many innovative ideas as Microsoft which is damn near zero. By creating free software, the open source movement kicks third party companies in the kidneys while Microsoft is efficiently pushing them down already.

      If Microsoft opened the source to Windows (perhaps 98) tomorrow, Linux would die a quick death or revert back to being a tool of hobbyists.

      In fact, that might be the ultimate weapon in any potential trade war with Europe. ;)

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    3. Re:There will be jobs for good programmers, but... by listen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Microsoft opened the source to Windows (perhaps 98) tomorrow, Linux would die a quick death or revert back to being a tool of hobbyists.

      No, IMO, we'd just have a near perfect wine in about a year... and Linux use would skyrocket. Be honest, have you ever used anything but windows for more than a day? Really? That kind of comment makes me think not.

      Re your software point... wtf? You want to ban people making open source applications? How much sense does that make? Law should not there to sustain any particular business models...
      You shouldn't ban something just because you don't want to do it.

      And the research point... IMO, a lot of the interesting research is done in universities. Integration is done within companies. If the majority of the world was on an OSS platform, universities might make more effort to push their research ideas into production. This should certainly be encouraged. Things like HCI are just starting to get enough academic respect to garner reasonable funding.

      Universities are funded by government and industry, along with tuition fees. I think thats where the money will come from to fund new research in software too. Industry forums, which produce specs ( ISO, ECMA, etc etc) will probably evolve to also produce and maintain standard open source reference implementations.

      But I still think there will be a few niches for proprietary software. Its funny industrys with maybe a couple of hundred players world wide, with very specific needs, that can drive 2 or 3 entire companies. That kind of stuff will stay proprietary for a long while yet...

    4. Re:There will be jobs for good programmers, but... by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This sounds like an MS baiter to me.....open source solutions are as good as the users want them to be....if you don't like something, fix it yourself or pay an opensource programmer to fix it for you.....the real question boils down to "how much is that bug really bugging you?"...Even MS products are released with an "acceptable number of bugs"....let's not get hung up on perfection when simply getting the job done is more important.

      Here's my take on the "Software Ecosystem" as Bill likes to call it......people will forever onward need to get custom stuff done on computers...it's a fact. Not every project can be mass produced for the world and sold to billions of people for INSANE profit levels. I believe that most computer work is custom stuff, a little glue here, adapter there, specialized GUI for operators....this is where most of the rubber meets the road...it will always be there.

      OSS equalizes the playing field for people/companies that want to realize all of the profits themselves. No MS tax, no tax to others, simply your brain and as much as you can produce. OSS is also good for business because they own the software that they've paid to be created...no extra tax in the future for them either, no update charge, no extra fees to keep current on MS Exchange Server, Backoffice server or whatnot....they write spec's for something, it's produced, they pay once and own the source...if they need maintaince, it's easily purchased from a competitive field of qualified professionals.....it's good business.

      I've got no problem with people "buying" a solution either, that's part of the capitalist system. Define what you are good at, find a market niche and purchase the rest from people that are good at their respective areas.

      It's the tax created by MS's "network effect" that has lots of people chafing...the idea that somehow I MUST send a good percentage of my profits elsewhere....it's MS's "Toll Booth" philosophy that's gonna cause them trouble....people don't like paying tolls, and they usualy find ways to either "slug" the meters or sneak around....In this case, they build their own seperate "Information superhighway"....OSS

      OSS simply levels the playing field for programmers and buyers....we've all (people who use OSS) come to the conclusion that sharing a free OS, even with it's bugs (open to interpretation, I have not found any) is better than paying the increasingly draconian "Windows Tax" EVERY time you turn around. Pay for this, pay for that, pay to get inspected, pay when the inspectors kick in your door, coming to check your licenses. MS has turned their OS into a shakedown at every level.

      Most disingenous was Bill G's comment about OSS keeping countries poor and being fine if you want your country to stay backward and agricultural....bullsh*%....it gives them a "leg up" on the competition, not a deficit. This put's the competition strictly on brain power rather than lawyer power.

      Time's gonna come when everyone is gonna have to pick which side of the revolution they want to be on....I've already done that because I see that MS can't win this fight...there's no company to buy, there's nobody to really sue (yeah, SCO fud, but they are going home in a wheelbarrow)...This can't be stopped primarily because it's really good for business and programmers alike.....it's only bad for the "Toll-booth operators" like MS.....

  5. Say Jah to OSS by Eberlin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jah, mon! We got the bobsled team feelin' irie after jammin' on tuxracer a few times.

    Besides, mon, lemme tell you -- after they said that Linux had superior rastability, we were sold.

    "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds." (Redemption Song)

    1. Re:Say Jah to OSS by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Funny
      " Jah, mon! We got the bobsled team feelin' irie after jammin' on tuxracer a few times.

      Besides, mon, lemme tell you -- after they said that Linux had superior rastability, we were sold."

      You obviously are not fluent in Caribbean languages ;-) What you just wrote there is Jamacian. Here is the Trinidadian translation:

      Ya, man! We got de cricket team feelin' rel good jammin' on de tuxracer a few times.

      Besides, man, lemme tell yeh -- after dey say dah Linux had de bes' reliability fo' true, we was all sole!

      Seriously, in high school in Trinidad, they teach english as a second language. This is according to my mother who was a teacher in that country for many years.

  6. This is a Good Thing by henriksh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm wondering what others think of the impact efforts like this may have on software development jobs in the US. Is IT still a viable field to get into and if so will it last?
    IT will always be viable to those that enjoy the field. Maybe salaries will go down. So fscking what, if you enjoy what you're doing?

    The fact that Free Software is gaining in popularity is a Good Thing (tm). Yes, it will lead to lower wages and perhaps fewer jobs, but society as a whole will benefit.
  7. Great... by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now the RIAA will start a campain against the OSS pirates in the Caribbeab.... oh, wait....

    1. Re:Great... by wadetemp · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's fine, they'll never catch them. The OSS pirates sail on the fastest ship in the world, the Black Perl. (Or is it the most obfuscatable ship, I can't remember.)

  8. Re:long term by SpriteGF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree, but programming would only be worth doing in the long run if you actually enjoyed doing it. After society's fascination with day-to-day software like Office wears off as the century progresses, programming may simply be viewed as nothing more than a service field to keep essential computers running, for computers would be inevitably integrated into all facets of life.

    In fact, I think a lot of this is already happening.

    www.firastudios.com

  9. Will it last? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Interesting


    IANAEconomist, but I doubt that any of the US economy is going to last.

    Forget long-term sustainablity issues, and just notice the increasing flood of companies moving manufacturing offshore to cut their costs. Certainly a smart move if all else were equal, but as more and more companies do it there's going to be less and less money to go around for the American worker, and as the total worker income drops the total consumer spending will drop as well.

    And consumer spending amounts to almost 2/3 of the US economy. Expect a viscious cycle until the US economy stabilizes on a new equilibrium, with few US citizens able to participate in our traditional profligate lifestyle.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Will it last? by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Please. I hear this same argument all of the time. Although we have challenges to overcome in the next few years, to bet that US economy will not continue to be the world wide leader for the concievable future is insane.

      The US started the IT craze. The IT industry is being increasingly taken over by countries outside of the US. The US started the biotech craze. The biotech industry, is and will continue, to be increasingly non-US based. The US is starting the nanotech craze right now. Eventually countries outside of the US will start doing that to. The point is things aren't nearly as dire for the US as you think. Just look at the amount of money the US government is putting into basic nanotech.

      Sorry US haters, we'll be here for a while.

    2. Re:Will it last? by Poeir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've hinted at something I wanted to mention, so I'll reply to your post. This is primarily opinion, but I'm reasonably confident that fact would back it up if I bothered to do any research.

      For a long time (at least back to 1901, if not much farther), the main export of the US hasn't been cars, refrigerators, microwaves, drugs, televisions, computers, weapons or indeed anything physical. The primary export has been new creations that no one has ever done before. The product that the US will primarily develop and produce after the next ten years but before the next twenty doesn't exist yet. No one knows what it is, and if they did, they'd have started the patent process.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  10. Businesses will need programmers. by janda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There will always be a business need for programmers to glue software together and create things that nobody else sells or builds.

    For example, the IRS changes their reporting requirements every now and then. I don't know of any company that would risk an OSS bug in that kind of software.

    There will always be a need for people who can do software upgrades and systems work. A lot of that can't be sent out of the states because of the cost of shipping the computers around.

    --
    Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
  11. Resources in T&T by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "The two-island nation of Trinidad and Tobago (TT) relies on imports for almost everything except beer, rum, some locally-grown farm products, and oil -- and oil is its major cash export. That oil is expected to last, at most, another 35 years. After that, how is TT going to pay foreign companies for software licenses?"

    My family is from T&T (although I was born in Canada) so let me clarify a few things:

    It's more than 2 islands. There are a lot of little islands too but the 2 main ones are Trinidad and Tobago. They used to be separate countries but were amalgamated by the British (who valued them for the cane fields) for administrative simplicity.

    T&T has 2 major exports, not one: Oil and drugs. Seriously. The US suppliers take their yhats down from Florida and sail into Tobago beaches. This is where they load up on that which was produced in South America, particularly Colombia. The other main industry is tourism which is obviously not a cash export.

    But the author is right about oil being critical to the economy. The main reason my family is well off is that my father's father worked for the oil companies for 35 years earning far above average wages. Keep in mind that T&T is a 3rd world country and you see poverty over there like you never see in north america, not even in the First Nations' areas of Canada.

    " Too often, when we hear the phrase, "developing country," it's used as a euphemism for, "poverty-stricken nation whose most obvious features are poorly-maintained roads, tin-roofed shacks, bad plumbing, and unreliable electricity.""

    There is a lot of poverty. There are a whole lot of VERY VERY wealthy people as well. I expect that the relative number of wealthy and poor people to middle class folks is higher than in the USA.

    The highways and roads in cities are well maintained. If you get out into rural areas in the jungle and such, it is to be expected that you will dodge potholes that your car could fall into. And when driving on mountain roads, you've gotta watch out for sections that have fallen into the sea.

    As to housing, there is a lot of nice housing, and there are a lot of poor shacks as well.

    The electricity is more reliable than you'd think. But the level of people connecting things illegally to the power lines is high. This makes being a power linesman quite dangerous because you can get killed when the power is officially shut down and someone's illegally and improperly connected device fries you.

    1. Re:Resources in T&T by joshsnow · · Score: 2, Informative

      T&T has 2 major exports, not one: Oil and drugs. Seriously. The US suppliers take their yhats down from Florida and sail into Tobago beaches. This is where they load up on that which was produced in South America, particularly Colombia. The other main industry is tourism which is obviously not a cash export.
      Not sure that staging drugs from South America through Tobago rates as an 'export' strictly speaking. Drugs are staged through the Bahamas, St.Vincent and the Grenadines etc, so nothing unusual there.
      But the author is right about oil being critical to the economy. The main reason my family is well off is that my father's father worked for the oil companies for 35 years earning far above average wages. Keep in mind that T&T is a 3rd world country and you see poverty over there like you never see in north america, not even in the First Nations' areas of Canada.
      Is this true? True, the standard of living for many people is 'lower' than in North America or Europe, but the quality of life could be said to be higher in some cases. I remember the first time I went to Tobago, (to meet my future in-laws). We came from Barbados having stopped there for a week on the way out from England. Being in Tobago after being in Barbados was a shock, true enough. The way of life, the lack of creature comforts, no big department stores etc. However, after a few days, I found I wasn't missing them. Life was laid back, simple and cool.
      Anyway, enough already. You forget to mention the racial differences and the break down of wealth between the different racial groups. You also forget to mention the TT Government monopoly on oil distribution and (AFAIK) production. The corruption etc. I personally think Tobago would be better off without Trinidad.

    2. Re:Resources in T&T by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Informative
      "Is this true? True, the standard of living for many people is 'lower' than in North America or Europe, but the quality of life could be said to be higher in some cases. I remember the first time I went to Tobago, (to meet my future in-laws). We came from Barbados having stopped there for a week on the way out from England. Being in Tobago after being in Barbados was a shock, true enough. The way of life, the lack of creature comforts, no big department stores etc. However, after a few days, I found I wasn't missing them. Life was laid back, simple and cool."

      You'd be surprised how it has changed. It is getting a lot more touristic, although I think there are still no big department stores or strips with McDonalds, KFC, etc.

      But I do agree with the part about being laid back, simple and cool. I think the smaller the island is, the further back into the 'past' you go with regards to how relaxed and friendly it is.

      "Anyway, enough already. You forget to mention the racial differences and the break down of wealth between the different racial groups. You also forget to mention the TT Government monopoly on oil distribution and (AFAIK) production. The corruption etc. I personally think Tobago would be better off without Trinidad."

      True enough. Because I didn't grow up in TT, such things are not so apparent to me, but I am well aware of the struggles between the Afrian versus Indian populations and the stigmas that exist even today.

  12. Software Development is No Longer For the US by yintercept · · Score: 2, Funny
    You need to sell an awful lot of trinkets to cruise ship passengers to buy a proprietary office suite.

    Hopefully the OSS revolution will help rid the world of the indignity caused by cruise ships filled with passengers buying trinkets.

    As for the question of IT jobs. The software developing jobs will gradually fade into memory, but there is still a need for having IT skills, and there will continue to be jobs for network admins, data entry and report writers, etc.

    The main goal of OSS is simply to end the idea of software development as a business. Software development is only one piece of the pie.

    But back to third world evangelizing. Most US software companies have found out that they cannot afford serious OSS development. When the flaws of the revolution become apparent, it is natural to move to the third world.

    The question is whether or not the natives have caught on to the double edge sword. Preaching free software and creating a world where software is only taken and not traded, then the third world nimrods who fall for the propaganda will find their software development skills worth less than the local trinket makers.

    None of the natives are buying
    any second hand American Dreams

    Jimmy Buffet

    In someways I see this little Stalin-wannabe iconoclast preaching in the third world as the ultimate act of contempt. Giving your work away for free doesn't work in the first world. So you preach to the peasantry of the glories of the revolution to the third world.

    It is a fun example of history repeating itself. The fearless leader preaches the glories of revolution to the peasantry knowing full well that the dictatorship of the prolitariat intends to pave the roads of their paradise with the blood of their followers.

    1. Re:Software Development is No Longer For the US by Ogerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strange. You seem to have reversed half your viewpoints since the parent post -- in which you stated (in essense) that OSS was an evil communist plot to rob everyone of the ability to make a living. OK, I'll bite. I'm bored so what the hey. Maybe you aren't a troll afterall.

      But there needs to be an economic reward for the developers. What we need is something different from this world of mega monopolies and free software revolution against the machine. We need to figure out how to create a structure where there is both a flow of ideas and money.

      There's this nasty lie floating about that OSS is just a wild-eyed revolution "against the machine" and without economic reward for those involved. I would propose that this myth is largely propagated by those with stake in the "old way" of doing software business. While OSS is indeed a revolution, it is not against the principles of business, the free market economy, and being paid for hard work. It's just a different (and incredibly more efficient) approach at arriving at the same goal. I personally do (paid) consulting using OSS solutions. The free software I use, develop and/or enhance gives me a large advantage over my competitors -- I can charge them less for the total package because all they're paying for is my labor. I could keep my own custom software closed, but then I'd be freeloading off the hard work of others and hindering the revolution from continuing. (and if it stopped, there goes my business model) And of course by staying open, I get free bug-fixes, feedback suggestions, and enhancements from other people in a similar line of work. So it's something of a 'symbiotic' relationship with other OSS developers. Not all who use my software pay me for consulting, but enough do, and that's all that matters to me. I'm doing something I love and getting paid to do it. Sure, it's a brand new business and I'm not making the big bucks, but all things start out small.

      "Free Software" alone won't kick the third world's IT industry into high gear. There has to be an economic reward for the hard work it takes to become a great software developing center. Reworked revolutionary sloganeering (even with the Who playing in the background) won't create software heaven.

      It depends on what you mean by "high gear." If many independent developers and small businesses can collectively accomplish more than traditional large software development firms, then that should be considered the new "high gear" even if those people aren't under the same roof in a big flashy headquarters. As for developing countries, they're just working at inching forward in first gear anyhow. So OSS is currently a great way to give them a boost because there are no barriers to entering the labor market of OSS development. "What about exports?" you may ask. Well, it's just labor. So there's no reason why US consultants can't pay overseas developers to help in meeting their clients' needs. And heck, the inverse is true as well!

      I would love to be able to make a living developing OSS, however, there needs to be a way to pay rent.

      Start brainstorming. Start out by finding out what the needs of local businesses are. Ask around. Right now, a career with OSS is usually about being your own boss. That'll change in the future as larger consulting firms develop, but for now it's the easiest option.

      For that matter, I think software developers should make enough that on a whim they could vacate for the islands on a cruise ship, and maybe buy some trinkets.

      If they think that's a worthwhile expenditure of disposable income, software developers can do what the vast majority of the world's population would have to do: save up. "On a whim" implies gratuitous wealth. Maybe possible, maybe not. Depends on how good of an entrepreneur you are. (:

  13. I know this is not popular round here by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not only that, OpenOffice and other Open Source programs can be customized and modified at will -- by local programmers instead of by companies overseas

    But one of the reasons MS is achieved so much success is because they made their stuff very easy to extend a long time ago, witness the gazillions of VB coders out there who use MS components in their apps, for example its a doddle to stick another button on to IE and code whatever you want behind it in C++ or VB taking advantage of almost all MS office functionality/disfunctionality depending on your point of view. Jesus the number of people I have seen working in major corps who depend on their self built spreadsheets to get anything done alone defies belief.

    I always find this a very disingenuous argument for OSS as it implies MS software cannot be customized when it obviously can. Yes you dont have the source code but the occasions where the OS source is required are few and far between for application developers.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:I know this is not popular round here by FooGoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      You IP address has been noted and the OSS Inquisition has been dispatched. Slowly step away from the computer and place your hands above your head.

      You will be assim....errrr...not be harmed.
      Thank you for your cooperation.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    2. Re:I know this is not popular round here by Feztaa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I always find this a very disingenuous argument for OSS as it implies MS software cannot be customized when it obviously can. Yes you dont have the source code but the occasions where the OS source is required are few and far between for application developers.

      How much more customizeable can you get than having the source code? What I mean is, if you have the source, you can do *anything* concievable with it. Not just the things that Microsoft predicted you might want to change (even if that does happen to be 99% of it).

      Say, what's the fastest way to rename 1,000 files according to some regular expression on your Windows box?

    3. Re:I know this is not popular round here by datawar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people don't need to do anything concievable with their computers... They need to do a small subset of those things that Microsoft predicted they might need to do.

      And Microsoft gives them a happy, shiny, easy way to mess just with those things... Most VB coders would fall flat on their face if they had to mess with a large, poorly documented, open source application writen in C/C++/Java/whatever (add to that the fact that many OSS applications are written in esoteric (by VB standards) languages like Python or Lisp)...

      Point being that Microsoft gives its customers what they want/need, not *everything*.

      Oh, and renaming files according to a regular expression has absolutely nothing to do with having the source code to anything... You simply get a Perl port and hack away.

    4. Re:I know this is not popular round here by Feztaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And when you need to send the file to someone else on their computer, they need your modified code, along with the code that someone else hacked together to add something else for another file. And now this middle person has two patches which may be incompatiable.

      Right. That's why everybody submits their patches to the original author, who merges them, ensures they are compatible, and releases a new version that works for everybody.

  14. Dah... by Duncan3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is IT still a viable field to get into and if so will it last?

    No. Absolutely not.

    Alice spends 40 hours a week at work developing databases, and 40 hours a week working on OpenOffice.

    Bob spends 40 hours a week at work writing an office suite, and 40 hours a week working on PostgreSQL.

    I will use Alice's office suite, and Bob's database.

    Think hard: Did you all expect your open source project to put everyone else out of a job but not you?

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  15. Software development jobs will Leave the US. by FooGoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Basic programming jobs will leave the US. As applications get more complex there is less incentive to hire local programmers to do basic code work. I can hire foreigners to do the grunt work or use OSS toolkits/libraries to save money. I can then put that money into my core business which is marketing. Everyone that works at a software hous knows that marketing runs the show.

    Th US has always exported jobs. I started in IT in 1989 as an IT Manager and have avoided the development and engineering jobs like the plauge because they where being outsourced. In 1994 I changed my focus from IT Managment to security because better network management tools had arrived an made it easier to outsource IT Management. Through the 90s I watched my IT friends getting laid off as the companies they worked for outsource management to IBM, Exodus, C&W, ... In 2003 I took a promotion from Dir of Corp. Security to Dir of Production Operations and was laid off several months later after increasing uptime and everything else. Did I know that I would probably loose my job by taking the promotion? Yup! As a start-up on the decline I realised my director of sec. position was irrelevant so I angled for the Dir of Ops job which was very relevant to the company. I got the job and made improvements which benefited the company and I probably expended my employemt by over a year. Because I took the initiative to provide a service that my company needed I made out pretty well in the severance area.

    It's up to me to make my self relevant to US employers and I have found that the easiest way is through being in management (though the politics are a bitch). You can't make an impact or change the world if you are locked in cube coding our trapped behind 15 miles of cable in a server room.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    1. Re:Software development jobs will Leave the US. by pongo000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's up to me to make my self relevant to US employers and I have found that the easiest way is through being in management...You can't make an impact or change the world if you are locked in cube coding our trapped behind 15 miles of cable in a server room.

      Thank you, from the bottom of my cube-locked heart. If it weren't for folks like you, who would make all the outsourcing and layoff decisions?

    2. Re:Software development jobs will Leave the US. by FooGoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since, you brought it up. When I said the politics are a bitch I meant it. When I took that promotion I laid off several members of the team I took over. Why? They where under performing. I replace them with qualified people from my old department who would have been laid-off themselves. As Dir of security I oversaw the lay-offs of 400 people within the company. Only 3 where my decision. I fought to keep the people that where loyal to me and did their jobs well. Thats all any manager can do. I put my ass on the line for my team and it cost me. I made political enemies and later I was laid-off. Would I do it again? Yes. I had a team of great techies working for me they where loyal to me and I was loyal to them. Thats what I want in a manager because I didn't have it when I was starting out.

      Is management tough? Yes, you have to make tough choices not just should we use Linux or Solaris but who is going to get a paycheck next week or should we lay off so and so because his wife just died of cancer last month.

      I know it's frowned upon but I love being a tech manager. I get to work with great people on interesting projects that may someday change the way people think. It's already happend once in my lifetime. I get to see tech evolve like most people don't because I am not focused on one specifc area. I can understand coders who are writing the platform and talk to the ops guys who are build the systems. I get to see the big picture and where it's going.

      It's great. But there are still 400 people I walked out the door. I just tried to make it as painless as possible under the circustances. I could lead my team but not the company. I didn't think a company could spend 300 mil in 4 years and have nothing to show for it. Shows you how good I am at understanding management.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    3. Re:Software development jobs will Leave the US. by FooGoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. I am not OSFSF fanatatic But I believe the the real benefit of OSS is not that it's free but it allows you to freely integrate which is a definate bonus for governments and their tax payers.

      I think that the Open Source movement is suited for goverment because the gov usually deals with undirected problems and since OSS is basically undirected in that you can make almost anything from the available parts its a good fit. Closed source apps are designed to solve specific directed problems usually within rigid criteria...a function of corporate development.

      It makes sense to me.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  16. In-house code by mccalli · · Score: 4, Insightful
    An awful lot of code is purely for in-house applications. This kind of stuff simply isn't threatened by open source, in fact I think it is helped.

    Commoditise all the building blocks you want. Operating systems? Fine. Office applications? Yep - alright. Development tools? Yes please, we like that. When you're finished, you still left with a ton of tools that need plugging together to do useful work for a business.

    Now, if your business just needs Office to write letters and send invoices, plus a database to track stock, then you were never in the kind of software market I'm talking about anyway. If, however, you happen to be a multi-national bank needing realtime market data information feeding to custom databases, with their own trading front ends etc. - this kind of stuff is only helped by Open Source. Give us the middleware (in this set-up, the OS and database is almost immaterial) and we'll carry on building the final product thank you. Always plenty of work for developers here.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  17. And the official spokesman of the effort should be by JessLeah · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Guybrush Threepwood.

  18. Of course IT is still a "viable field"... by PinglePongle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    for people who are passionate about it. For the "this looks like a good way to make a quick buck" brigade, I think the game is up...

    Seriously, I've been through a couple of IT recessions, and it's never pretty. If you're good, care about your work and want to work hard, there are still plenty of opportunities. If you're into IT because it's well paid and involves no heavy lifting, you'll find it hard to get by untill the next boom (I've been through a couple of booms, as well). And in the confusion, lots of good people get laid off, and lots of clowns stay around - it's not fair, not clean and good people get screwed.

    So, right now, IT is like most other jobs - if you're good, enjoy the work, and have people-skills, you'll probably be okay. If all you want is a fat paycheck in return for an MCSE, bad attitude and the ability to use TLAs without blushing, no, IT is pretty terrible right now...

    --
    It's all very well in practice, but it will never work in theory.
  19. Story by FooGoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My wifes family moved to from Jamacia to the US when she was 3. a few years ago we went to Jamacia and she was upset to see how poor the country was compaired to the US. The fact is as with most Caribbean nations more Jamaicans live outside Jamaica than live there. This is due to a lack of oppurtunity at home. If the people in these nations have more access to OSS or any technology it's a very good thing. They have more oppurtunity for education and we get more skilled immigrants.

    The US is an immigrant nation and for the past few years population growth in the US is being fueled by immigration because fewer US citizens are having kids. It only makes sense to outsource our our needs to countries with high migration rates to the US. South America and Asia. That way we increase our skilled population base.

    People like to attribute this to evil globalism or money grubbing multinationals but it's simple. If we don't have generations of skilled workers in this country it will cease to exist.This is not a bad thing for the US.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  20. IT is still viable if you don't suck by lamontg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Is IT still a viable field to get into and if so will it last?

    Yes. But in the future it won't be enough to merely understand how computers work in order to make it in the IT field. You will need to understand how an IT department fits within the overall structure of an organization and how to meet the requirements of your internal customers. You will also need to understand how to scale your IT services within the organization. There are entirely too many bad system administrators out there who really need to get either educated or purged, and even the current IT downswing hasn't been able to do it. There are still too many people who are in the IT job market who should simply stop sending their resumes around. 1999 is over, and you weren't that good.

    If you can't think beyond "this machine is broken, here's how to fix it" to "this process is broken, here's how to fix it" then don't bother going into IT. There are already way too many people who are perfectly technically capable in IT but who have no idea of how to solve, or in some cases even identify, a larger problem.

    (And yes, I had a bad week at work)

  21. Software Viability and offshore dev by joshsnow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having recently been made redundant, I'm not sure that programming is a viable career option. One of the reasons for the redundancy was that the company is outsourcing development to India. OK, so the major reason was that we were the subject of a "merger" (takeover) and they wanted our customerbase.
    BTW "we" were the result of another merger which had occurred 18 months earlier.
    I see the combined company eventually employing only business analysts, project co-ordinators, salesmen and client liason people. There will probably be a few network and infrastructure guys but eventually, given that all PCs and laptops had a "standard" build, were updatable from a central network point etc, this could be outsourced too. That leaves support functions, like admin and purchasing. Be creative enough and that could be outsourced too!
    Regarding software dev in the carribean - why not? In a country like Trinidad and Tobago, the dollar, Euro and Pound exchange rates are so favourable to "investors" that setting up a software shop really shouldn't be a problem. Trinis are generally well educated, they speak English as a first language (OK, so it may not be Queens English, but it's still English - mon!) they work hard. Matter of fact, I was thinking of doing the same thing, but in Barbados where most of the kids are highly educated and most of them are bored because there are no jobs. Those that don't drift into drugs are getting out to Canada, the States or the UK.
    I know this first hand, I have family all over...

  22. Trinkets offensive. by FooGoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Selling trinkets to cruise ships. If I had to sell trinkets to cruise ship passengers to feed my family I would. It has nothing to do with the price of an office suite. It means that there is no need for office suites. There is no oppurtunity to use one whether it is free or not.

    These trinkets are usually hand made by familys to be sold. It's a family business designed to fit their markets and has to do with the "bandwitdth" of their ecomony and
    not the price of an office suite.

    The US economy has a ton a bandwidth to support many industries. Just because they don't doesn't mean it's bad for them.

    Begin Rant
    I'd much rather sell a "trinket" than stand on the corner begging for cash for food.

    It's not like OSS doesn't have a need for trinkets. Look at ThinkGeek.com selling trinkets to geeks. Ooooh look at the shiny light on my new Mach 3 combination LED flashlight, key chain, bottle opener, tire repair kit. Or my desktop refrigerator that holds a 6 pack of Geek Drink of Choice, or caffinated soap. What the fuck is caffinated soap for? Maybe it's for removing the blue thinking goo from my ass when I sat on it in my new ergonomic Quake Battle Chair.

    Maybe our economy has too much bandwidth.
    End Rant

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  23. Why customize . . . by Idou · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when you are going to be forced to upgrade at some particular time that you have no control over?

    How can a company afford to pay programmers to customize after paying monopolistic prices to get basic functionality?

    What if some of the tools I want to use are not part of the MS collective, how will I get the MS parts to talk to the non-MS parts (I have actually taken an Excel file, dumped it into .csv in both Excel and Open Office? I don't know if my version of Excel has some kind of bug, but its output was too messed up to deal with).

    And, yes, I have modified APPLICATION (let's compare apples to apples, here) source code in order to get the kind of output I wanted (and it would have been a real bitch if I couldn't have).

    No, it is not impossible to customize MS software, it just is not as economical.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!