Slashdot Mirror


Ximian Evolution's New Clothes

Lispy writes "Looks like everyone's favorite graphical email client, Ximian Evolution, will get a new interface with the upcoming release. I found a posting on the Evolution hackers bulletin board which leads to some mocked-up screenshots (here: calendar, tasks, mail, contacts and one of the shrunken navbar). Although this is mostly eyecandy, this could be the right time to make yourself heard. What do you think about a maturing Evolution that goes its own way and leaves the Outlook-like interface behind?"

23 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Someone should tell Ximian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    That he's naked! The clothes aren't actually invisible.

  2. XImian's logo looks like a self-spanking monkey. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that is evolved.

  3. Re:Bluring out emails by jared_hanson · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's OK, Slashdot has done a remarkable job of censoring anything that I have been trying to see.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  4. Evolution not for everybody by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although Evolution is comparable to Outlook in many ways, it is not for everybody. Take fundamental Christians, for example. To them, Evolution doesn't exist. :)

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Evolution not for everybody by mblase · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, most fundamentalist Christians who are informed about such things will say that it's only macroevolution which they disbelieve. Which, I suppose, means you have to execute it using a mouse click instead of a keyboard shortcut.

    2. Re:Evolution not for everybody by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1, Funny

      Be sure to put them back where you found them.

      Fundamental Christians are very pipcky concerning food and due to their constant bible-thumping, they make awful pets.

      The bible DOES read "Go forth and procreate" somewhere... Or something along that at least; might be a bucces with Christian fundamentalist women! The bad thing of this is, is that your future stepbrother might also be your competitor...

  5. Emacs keybindings by DarknessInBlindingLi · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as they don't give me my Emacs-style keybindings back, I don't care about no eyecandy!

  6. If you're a Slashdot subscriber... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you get first dibs on slashdotting everyones servers!

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:If you're a Slashdot subscriber... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but since most stories are dupes, you'll just be slashdotting an already slashdotted server anyhow.

  7. Re:Great by int2str · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Linux 9.0", eh?

    You're not gonna get much love around here, Bob. What is it, RedHat 9, Mandrake 9.0?

    The current stable Linux version is 2.4.20. Don't confuse the Linux kernel with your GNU/Linux distribution of choice.

    Cheers,
    André

  8. Re:I just have 2 words to words to say by Osty · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have 4 words to say: Mozilla Don't Got Calender.

    If you're willing to go for one more word, you could actually sound intelligent. How about, "Mozilla doesn't have a calendar," instead? Also, since it's irrelevant (and impossible?) for Mozilla to have or be a machine in which cloth or paper is made smooth and glossy by being pressed through rollers, I fixed your misspelling of "calendar".

  9. It cant be worse... by AvengerXP · · Score: 2, Funny

    Than Lotus Notes's Interface. Oh the horror, the humanity!

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  10. Re:Outlook 2003 by fava · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone notice in the screen shot listed above most of the email is msn spam?

  11. Re:clothes? by Kaa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just resolved today that I *am* going to get around to writing my own email client after the bloody thing stopped working...

    Zawinski's Law: Every program attempts to expand until it can read mail. Those programs which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can.

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  12. Re:clothes? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2, Funny

    oooooohhhhh (groan).

    Sounds you got one of those self spanking monkey's I heard about...

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  13. One key Outlook feature missing... by theendlessnow · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they haven't figured out a way to automatically send an arbitrary message to everyone in your address book via some external means.

    I'm not going to use it until feature complete!!

  14. Re:Win32/Cygwin port by ptr2void · · Score: 2, Funny

    What for? Are there still people using Windows?

  15. Re:I just have 2 words to words to say by ChaosMagic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Although still in development and a bit buggy, it includes the basic functionality. I have been using it for a couple of months now.

    You were right about the buggy bit, it's only the 14th you know; you've been using it for two WEEKS not months... ;)

    --
    ... I guess
  16. Re:no spam filter? by jfm3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most ISPs do spam filtering these days. Users demand it.

    Spam is put in a special IMAP folder rather than being deleted outright, so you can double check if you want. This is the same thing you get with a client side spam filter, right?

    I'd rather have client side spam filtering than not, I agree, but I still think the ideal place to do it is on the server side.

  17. Re:clothes? by elmegil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given that I was planning to work in Java anyway, that looks pretty cool, I'll check it out. Thanks! Bitching on slashdot DOES pay off!

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  18. 200 Baud. by Ayandia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trying to download these images reminds me of when I practically had to whistle into my phone to check my mail.

    Thank god for progress...and Slashdot's nostagia-inducing ServerPain(TM).

  19. Re:Evolution Screenshots cache / mirror of mockups by rvsrvs · · Score: 2, Funny

    So why smudge the guy's email address in the top pane of the address book, but leave his email and PHONE NUMBER in the bottom? :^)

  20. Re:XImian's logo looks like a self-spanking monkey by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

    BSD's demon isn't offensive, it's a play on words, and ask most people it's the cutest logo for a computer system they've seen. It's a sad state of affairs when a monkey (Ximian, get it?) is offensive. It's just a logo, and quite an apt one. I assume you approve of the Debian swirl thing, as long as they don't include Tux, as I see you don't seem to like penguins. Sure it can't be construed as offensive without some serious thought, but what does it mean, how does it symbolize the Debian Project? And why stop there? What about the Enron 'E', its a little crooked, seems we should have known they were up to something, or IBM's, I mean with those parts missing, my god its down right shady, should I not trust IBM's products now? The logo for MS windows isn't non-cultural as you say because they wanted to appeal to a large audience but because it's a Window, it made sense. Apples is an apple because, well the Steve's didn't think that a pomegranate would be a good image for a company named Apple, oh and notice that little Byte out of it, see humor, something it seems you lack. A logo should be something that embodies the entity it represents, while ideally being something that is easily recognizable. The people obviously have a thing about monkeys, who else would choose the word Ximian for their project, or mono for a C# implementation. They like monkeys, it's their project name, so obviously their logo is also a monkey. The BSD's demon is humor along the same lines as Apples, so it makes perfect sense to those who use it. If you want to deprive yourself of good software because a monkey scares you, that's up to you, but these logos and images do encompass the projects they represent, and for those who know, for example the users, they make sense

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."