Slashdot Mirror


Psychotic Lab Mice

meltoast writes "We send lab mice through a maze to see their reactions and then take that information and apply it to our knowledge of the human psyche. Well, what if those mice are completely out of their minds? Discover recently ran an article showing that mice kept in a standard laboratory environment may be crazy. 'In one sequence, a mouse climbs the stainless-steel walls of its cage, hangs from the ceiling by its forelegs while gnawing on the bars, then drops to the floor, only to repeat the process endlessly. On the other side of the cage, a second mouse performs backflips, one per second, for up to 30 minutes at a time.'"

130 comments

  1. All maze, no beer make Homer something something.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... Go crazy?

    Don't mind if I do!!

  2. Those hyperintelligent pandimensional beings!! by deek · · Score: 5, Funny
    • How better to disguise their real natures, and how better to guide your thinking. Suddenly running down a maze the wrong way, eating the wrong bit of cheese, unexpectedly dropping dead of myxomatosis. If it's finely calculated the cumulative effect is enormous.


    Credits to D.Adams ... R.I.P
    1. Re:Those hyperintelligent pandimensional beings!! by Jarth · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      You've neglegted to mention these mice-minds had the earth built for research purposes and thus are actually fooling us rather well into thinking it's us and not . . . them

      --
      free dom(inion) - free energy - free your mind - whee!
    2. Re:Those hyperintelligent pandimensional beings!! by YetAnotherHoopyFrood · · Score: 1

      Perhaps their unexpected lunacy is really an attempt to score points in Brockian Ultra Cricket. Or maybe not.

      --
      --------- "If I had a dollar for every time I said that, I'd be making money in a weird way."
  3. I've seen this by KingPrad · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I saw this with the gerbils I had for years. One would run endlessly on the treadwheel. The other would jump (gerbils can really jump!) and cling to the mesh top of the cage and chew at it. Eventually he actually managed to escape that way and run amok through the house for a bit. We put some stronger wire mesh on and that kept him inside. But I've definitely seen this with my gerbils and have a vague recollection of seeing it at a pet shop once.

    It wouldn't surprise me if the mice are insane from lack of stimulation. People get the same way when they're cooped up and take up all sorts of repetitive psychotic behaviors. It's a self-protection method for the brain I believe, keeping itself occupied in some endless task rather than concentrating on its continuously uninteresting environment and going crazy.

    I guess that would mean the mice are showing (possibly) insane behavior because the behavior is a a symptom of a deteriorating mind in a last-ditch effort to save itself.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    1. Re:I've seen this by mlush · · Score: 1
      One would run endlessly on the treadwheel.

      I hear that if you set up a treadwheel in the woods, normal mice, voles etc will use it!

      Perhaps its musine equivilant of hard drugs and the Great Musine Councel is running a War Against Treadwheels/p>

    2. Re:I've seen this by PizzaFace · · Score: 2, Funny
      People get the same way when they're cooped up and take up all sorts of repetitive psychotic behaviors. It's a self-protection method for the brain I believe, keeping itself occupied in some endless task rather than concentrating on its continuously uninteresting environment and going crazy.
      Are you talking about Slashdotters?
    3. Re:I've seen this by clambake · · Score: 2, Funny

      hear that if you set up a treadwheel in the woods, normal mice, voles etc will use it!

      But if a vole runs on a treadwheel in the woods, and no one is around to see it, is he really crazy?

    4. Re:I've seen this by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "It wouldn't surprise me if the mice are insane from lack of stimulation. People get the same way when they're cooped up and take up all sorts of repetitive psychotic behaviors. It's a self-protection method for the brain I believe, keeping itself occupied in some endless task rather than concentrating on its continuously uninteresting environment and going crazy."

      So that explains why I have over 2500 posts on slashdot ...

  4. How are we any more sane? by DJayC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On the other side of the cage, a second mouse performs backflips, one per second, for up to 30 minutes at a time.

    In my back yard my sister performs flips on a trampoline for up to 60 minutes at a time. My brother jumps into a body of water, only to get out and do it again for up to 45 minutes at a time.

    My point is, unless you want to get inside of their head, or ask them why they are doing what they are doing, we can't say it's abnormal behavior. To an "alien in space" (who knows nothing of human "culture") someone jumping on a trampoline, or someone jumping into a pool over and over again may seem pointless and that we are out of our minds. Just a thought. I'm sure the mice are just keeping themselves busy.

    1. Re:How are we any more sane? by egomaniac · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Three points of note:

      A) These activities consume up to half of the creatures' waking hours, every single day.

      B) The affected animals also exhibit other deficiencies and obsessive behaviors.

      C) The entire lifestyle of these creatures is wildly altered by the addition of something as simple as a cardboard tube to their cages.

      I hardly think that an hour on a trampoline every now and then is even remotely similar.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:How are we any more sane? by ChowyChow · · Score: 5, Funny
      C) The entire lifestyle of these creatures is wildly altered by the addition of something as simple as a cardboard tube to their cages.

      If you were trapped on an 10x10 meter island with nothing but a coconut tree and did not know of 'civilization' what would you do?

      Then, what would you do if we added Natalie Portman to your island?? (hot grits included) Yea, that's what I thought.
    3. Re:How are we any more sane? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      To an "Human in space" (who knows nothing of geek "culture") someone coding on a program, or someone compiling over and over again may seem pointless and that we are out of our minds. Just a thought. I'm sure slashdot-ers are just keeping themselves busy.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    4. Re:How are we any more sane? by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      I work in a avian cognition lab, and we have many pigeons.

      Most animals never display this type of behavior. There are a sad few that do - they develop tics from being kept in captivity. I'm not advocating removing animals from their natural environment, but our pigeons are kept quite well.

      Our bird (Matisse) constantly pecks at the back-side of his food dish. If you walk in the room, he'll look up at you and stop for a few minutes, and then go back to doing this. He doesn't do it all day, but he does it quite a long while.

      This behavior, like I said before, is extremely rare. It's not the widespread problem you make it out to be.

    5. Re:How are we any more sane? by clambake · · Score: 1

      Three points of note:

      A) These activities consume up to half of the creatures' waking hours, every single day.

      B) The affected animals also exhibit other deficiencies and obsessive behaviors.

      C) The entire lifestyle of these creatures is wildly altered by the addition of something as simple as a cardboard tube to their cages.


      So, what you are saying is the mice are playing Quake? I read nothing about that, I need to go back and reread.

    6. Re:How are we any more sane? by Zhenya · · Score: 1
      This would seem eerily familiar to...an office worker!

      A) These activities consume up to half of the creatures' waking hours, every single day.

      8 hours, and that's only 9-5. Do mice get weekends? They definitely don't get paid overtime, that's for sure.

      B) The affected animals also exhibit other deficiencies and obsessive behaviors.

      Like drinking 20 cups of coffee a day? Swivelling the swivel chair, round, and round, and round...Sharpening pencils with the electric sharpener? Or surfing porn? Rage?

      C) The entire lifestyle of these creatures is wildly altered by the addition of something as simple as a cardboard tube to their cages.

      New coffee machine! There's a CRANE outside! Look at all the pretty colours! Check out that new carpet the boss has! I have a NEW MOUSEMAT!

      Or maybe the office workers are the mice. Do they feel like mice? Trapped, like a mouse in a cage? Desperately squeaking for something more stimulating? Waving their little hairy tails recklessly behind them as they chew on the window panes...attacking each other in their madness...

      --
      Politics is derived from two words - poly, meaning many, and tics, meaning small blood-sucking insects.
    7. Re:How are we any more sane? by 241comp · · Score: 1

      Three points on slashdot readers:

      A) The activity of reading Slashdot and hacking code consume up to 1/2 of the creatures' waking hours, every single day.

      B) The affected animals also exhibit other deficiencies (such as social abilities) and obsessive behaviors (toward Linux).

      C) The entire lifestyle of these creatures is wildly altered by the addition of something as simple as a girlfriend into their cages... er... parents' basement.

      I hardly think that a life consumed with reading slashdot and hacking code is even remotely different.

    8. Re:How are we any more sane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the mice are just keeping themselves busy.

      I'm sure they are too. It doesn't mean they're not insane, though. That's what you do when you're locked up. You keep yourself busy. Sometimes you go a little nuts.

  5. Cubefarm by limekiller4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This behavior bears a disturbing resemblance to my former cubefarm cellmates.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
    1. Re:Cubefarm by Alethes · · Score: 3, Funny

      meltoast writes "We send employees through a cubicle farm to see their reactions and then take that information and apply it to our knowledge of the human psyche. Well, what if those employees are completely out of their minds? Discover recently ran an article showing that employees kept in a cubicle environment may be crazy. 'In one sequence, an employee climbs the cloth-covered walls of his cubicle, hangs from the false ceiling by his hands while gnawing on the frame, then drops to the floor, only to repeat the process endlessly. On the other side of the room, a second employee makes copies, one per second, for up to 30 minutes at a time.'"

    2. Re:Cubefarm by clambake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      meltoast writes "We send employees through a cubicle farm to see their reactions and then take that information and apply it to our knowledge of the human psyche. Well, what if those employees are completely out of their minds? Discover recently ran an article showing that employees kept in a cubicle environment may be crazy. 'In one sequence, an employee climbs the cloth-covered walls of his cubicle, hangs from the false ceiling by his hands while gnawing on the frame, then drops to the floor, only to repeat the process endlessly. On the other side of the room, a second employee makes copies, one per second, for up to 30 minutes at a time.'"

      Actually, this behavior is often a sign of perfectly sane employees with one absoluly stark raving manager.

    3. Re:Cubefarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, that's unusual or obsessive behaviour? Oh, dear ...

    4. Re:Cubefarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The observations about rats sound a lot like many work environments I've inhabited. Sometimes so similar I have suspected my work environment was part of some large lab experiment.


      This similarity is so strong...


      WAIT!


      The cheese just arrived.


      Gotta eat

  6. Sometimes /. editors make me wonder.... by $exyNerdie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How some stories can make past their rejection process....but anyways...

    When he reviewed the videotape, Würbel saw something reminiscent of home movies made at a psychiatric hospital. In the dark, the mice performed the same useless tasks repeatedly, with such a compulsive persistence that Würbel couldn't help but think something had gone awry in their brains. In one sequence, a mouse climbs the stainless-steel walls of its cage, hangs from the ceiling by its forelegs while gnawing on the bars, then drops to the floor, only to repeat the process endlessly.

    Even a kid can tell you that since this was done in the dark and the mouse didn't know that it was "stainless steel" bar, it was probably trying to escape...

    1. Re:Sometimes /. editors make me wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Key words: "In one sequence."

      And as someone pointed out above, they perform these tasks for hours. IANAPsychologist, but I know that useless behaviors which bear no fruit should eventually be ceased by anything capable of learning.

    2. Re:Sometimes /. editors make me wonder.... by Serra · · Score: 2

      How some stories can make past their rejection process....but anyways...

      Perhaps the /. editors actually read the article before making a snap judgement about it. It was actually very interesting and contained a lot of other information supporting the argument that lab rats might be psychotic.

    3. Re:Sometimes /. editors make me wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IANAPsychologist, but I know that useless behaviors which bear no fruit should eventually be ceased by anything capable of learning.

      So how long is it going to take you to stop posting to slashdot?

  7. The "acid test" of insanity by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    My point is, unless you want to get inside of their head, or ask them why they are doing what they are doing, we can't say it's abnormal behavior. To an "alien in space" (who knows nothing of human "culture") someone jumping on a trampoline, or someone jumping into a pool over and over again may seem pointless and that we are out of our minds. Just a thought. I'm sure the mice are just keeping themselves busy.

    Don't human psychiatric workers keep track of how many times their inmates masturbate as a measure of frustration and stress? And don't soldiers who are exposed to heavy enemy fire on a daily basis usually succumb to self-manipulation 10+ times a day?

    So are these mice jerking themselves silly or what? Just doing flips over and over isn't a sure sign of going nutso. Maybe they're just staying in shape! But if these cameras are capturing these mice reaching down between their legs a lot (or maybe rubbing their groins against every object in their cage), then I think we have a rock-solid case!

    GMD

    1. Re:The "acid test" of insanity by MulluskO · · Score: 0
      And don't soldiers who are exposed to heavy enemy fire on a daily basis usually succumb to self-manipulation 10+ times a day?
      You wouldn't happen to have a cite ready, would you?
      Also, pr0n does not constitute a suitible citation.
      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    2. Re:The "acid test" of insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, being a psychiatric worker, I can tell you we don't do that. We do ask them not to masturbate while we're working with them. Believe me, it's not hard for us to grant them some privacy in this regard. Considering we hover over just about every aspect of their lives, one thing I don't need added to my day is watching the residents masturbate.

  8. NO!!! by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    The mice have gone crazy? Oh rats!

    --
    Ron Paul 2012
    1. Re:NO!!! by clambake · · Score: 2, Funny

      The mice have gone crazy? Oh rats!

      If the mice have gone nuts, what happens to the squirrels? They become cheesy?

  9. MOD THIS TROLL DOWN, PLEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How some stories can make past their rejection process....but anyways...

    The decisions made by our esteemed editors are not for the likes of you to judge, Boy!

  10. Crazy? by Tyrdium · · Score: 3, Funny

    On the other side of the cage, a second mouse performs backflips, one per second, for up to 30 minutes at a time.
    Nah, it was just training for the Olympics...

  11. You talking 'bout mice or slashdot trolls? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmm. It's scary how many of these behaviors also apply to slashdot trolls:

    A) These activities consume up to half of the creatures' waking hours, every single day.

    I'm sure they spend about half their time in front of the computer either reading, posting, or thinking of new offensive, off-topic things to say on slashdot.

    B) The affected animals also exhibit other deficiencies and obsessive behaviors.

    You mean like hitting "refresh" on the slashdot home page every 1-2 minutes so they can get first post?

    C) The entire lifestyle of these creatures is wildly altered by the addition of something as simple as a cardboard tube to their cages.

    The entire day of these creatures is wildly altered by something as simple as a fellow slashdotter replying to their message, not realizing it wasn't serious.

    GMD

    1. Re:You talking 'bout mice or slashdot trolls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what you're saying, is that all we need to remove the trolls is purchase a few human sized running wheels? This is the greatest idea I have ever heard, let's give this man a nobel prize, fuck, let's give him all of them.

  12. ZOIT! NARF! by Glytch · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think so, Brain, but who'd want to watch Snow White and the Seven Samurai?

    1. Re:ZOIT! NARF! by AtariEric · · Score: 1

      Um, actually... (AtariEric slowly raises his hand...)

      --
      Don't trust any concentration of power.
  13. Normal? by AllMightyPaul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had a hampster for about two years (it died) and it would spend its entire day either on the wheel or gnawing at the cage trying to get out. It's not psychosis, it's just animals trying to escape from their cages. What he described the mouse doing - hanging from the cage, gnawing, dropping, and doing it all over again - is exactly what my hampster would do in her vain attempt to climb out the hole in the top of our cage. They're almost like velociraptors, testing all the weaknesses in the cage, looking for a way out... except my hampster tested the same weakness over and over again. She wasn't that smart, I don't think.

    1. Re:Normal? by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      1) Hamster has no 'p'.
      2) Real velociraptors (or whatever dinosaur they based the movie on) didn't live in cages.

      (GRAMMAR NAZI IN TRAINING)

    2. Re:Normal? by AllMightyPaul · · Score: 1

      Boy, I sure am glad you corrected me! I feel so stupid! *rolls eyes*

    3. Re:Normal? by Iainuki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These behaviors may indeed begin as attempts to escape. However, they are not. The animals persist in them even though their situation doesn't change. Imagine if you were locked in a room proportional to your size in the same ratio as these mice are. You, initially, might try to escape by searching the floors, the walls, and the ceiling for openings, panels, locks, or doors. You might do this three or four times to make sure you didn't miss anything on the previous passes. However, the analogy to the behaviors of these mice would be compulsively searching the surfaces of your prison for about eight hours a day (~50% of your waking time) every day for twenty years. That is not normal behavior. Just because animals aren't as smart as humans doesn't mean they're dumb. They can learn how to achieve their goals and also things they shouldn't do. When an animal is pursuing a self-destructive or pointless behavior, ask the same questions you would when you see a human being doing the same. My suspicion is that most lab animals suffer from, among other things, terminal boredom. Mice and rats are inveterate, if timid, explorers. Being locked in an unchanging cage for my entire life would drive me insane; why wouldn't the same happen to a rat?

    4. Re:Normal? by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Imagine if you were locked in a room proportional to your size in the same ratio as these mice are. You, initially, might try to escape by searching the floors, the walls, and the ceiling for openings, panels, locks, or doors. You might do this three or four times to make sure you didn't miss anything on the previous passes. However, the analogy to the behaviors of these mice would be compulsively searching the surfaces of your prison for about eight hours a day (~50% of your waking time) every day for twenty years. That is not normal behavior.

      Assuming that you nothing better to do, why not keep trying? This may not really be a psychotic behavior, but instead a single mindedness, and unwillingness/inability to give up. As a human, one might become frustrated with the situation and give up, but that is only because we are able to use logic. We would assume that if the bars were steel yesterday, and we couldn't chew through them, and they are still steel today and we still can't chew through them, then they will probably be steel tomorrow, and we won't be able to chew through them. I would question whether mice have the ability to analyze the situation and come to the same conclusion? Sure, they do have some capacity for memory and reasoning, they can be conditioned and trained after all, but is it as advanced as our own? Will a mouse realize that the bars can never be chewed through, no matter how much time he spends at it, or will he simply keep trying? I just wonder if we aren't anthropomophisizing these mice, just a bit, and applying our own attributes to them.
      And as for the backflipper, ya, he was probably off his rocker.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    5. Re:Normal? by tid242 · · Score: 1
      So apparently you missed the bit later in the article that positively correlated said repetitive and maladadaptive bahaviour with a decreased capacity for learning, or amplification of the pathology of various disorders/toxicities(lead, uranium, huntingtons dx mice). But overall (from what i've read thus far) generally you're missing the point (no offense intended of course:), the point of this entire article is that these mice may not live lives congruent with human lives, not because mice and humans are different, but because conditions impinge upon the lives of mice, that do not so for (wo)men.

      Perhaps (i think) the most interesting aspect of this entire article is the idea of decreased mental stimulation with respect to causality of myriad non-intellectual disorders. There have been longstanding correlations between, say income and health that can't be explained even when correcting for factors such as access to healthcare, et al. Or the cheapest way to improve society (life expectancy, health, sanitation, blah, blah blah )being public education (as in school, not as in public awareness commercials on the TV), while giving people the incomes a higher education would provide does not. The idea that poor mental stimulation causes unhealthy people is probably pretty close to true.

      If anyone here has ever worked in healthcare i'm sure they've noticed a huge disparity between the attitutes of people who have private party insurance, and those on state/federal insurance (aid) programs. It's anecdoctal of coruse, but i oft hear it referred to as the 'welfare attitude'-sort of percieved as people just expecting to get better because they're in a hospital/clinic/whatever but not really being motivated to help themselves. And oddly enough in my state (Minnesota) people on medicaid/CHIP oftentimes have more access to care than those with private party insurance...

      Also what i thought was interesting in the article is the assumption that while the mice are confined and have shitty lives, that people are free to just do whatever they want and are happy as can be. For an article to be questioning a cornerstone method of conducting experiements more often than not extrapolated to people, i find it counterintuitive that they would let such a bias slip by (actually i'm not suprised as it's Discover; i generally have little faith in those guys). Please inform me otherwise, but i've seen no studies to date that show that "most people" are uber happy most of the time, and feel free to do whatever they wish. i would really like to do a whole lot of different things next week - but you know what i'm going to be doing? - the same damn thing i'm doing this week. i think there's only 1 or 2 people i know of (out of hundreds/thousands) who really have the ability to be doing any differently. Perspective to the question at hand: i would venture to guess that a fair percentage of our population feel just as trapped in their lives as do those mice stuck in the cages, which is perhaps evidenced by the guestimates of a 5-10% prevalence of mental illness in US adults.

      -tid242

      --

      With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

  14. They're Pinky and The Brain by NetFusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're Pinky and The Brain
    Yes, Pinky and The Brain
    One is a genius
    The other's insane.
    They're laboratory mice
    Their genes have been spliced
    They're dinky
    They're Pinky and The Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain
    Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain
    Brain.

    Before each night is done
    Their plan will be unfurled
    By the dawning of the sun
    They'll take over the world.

    They're Pinky and The Brain
    Yes, Pinky and The Brain
    Their twilight campaign
    Is easy to explain.
    To prove their mousey worth
    They'll overthrow the Earth
    They're dinky
    They're Pinky and The Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain
    Brain, Brain, Brain, Brain
    Narf!

    1. Re:They're Pinky and The Brain by tuxedobob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow. I never thought that would ever be even vaguely on topic.

    2. Re:They're Pinky and The Brain by dacap · · Score: 1

      Well, that explains a lot when combined with Microsoft's extensive usability testing of their software products.

      "So what are we doing tonight, Bill?"
      "Same thing we do every night, Steve. Try to take over the WORLD!!!"

      --
      English -- gotta love it! / The engineers refuse to refuse the rocket until the refuse is removed from the launch pad.
  15. Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Its not uncommon for mice to wheel-- its akin to a kid riding a block. They get rid of excess energy and its fun for them.

    ITs also not uncommon for mice to climb cages and knaw on the bars-- they don't know they aren't wood, and this is also fun behaviour.

    But Backflips--or in other cases - random jumps are a sign of serious stress. As I understand it, in these laboratory situations they keep dozens of mice in a tiny area-- and mice are a socially sensitive animal. That is to say, they react to overcrowding, have stress, etc.

    I think these mice are being abused, and the people doing it should go to hell. Fucking assholes. You're going to experiment on mice, its your responsibility to treat them decently.

    Mice are like any common pet-- they react to pain, can be scared, can be stressed and need some private space.

    --
    Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    1. Re:Abused mice... by clambake · · Score: 1

      Its not uncommon for mice to wheel-- its akin to a kid riding a block.

      Man, that takes me back... Me and my block, just sitting there, riding around, you know. It was 100% concrete with two large holes in the side, you know, just your typical old cinder block, but boy could it move. Ahhh, good times.

    2. Re:Abused mice... by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 1

      Until you've actually seen what goes on in a research lab you should keep your uninformed mouth shut. People don't want to give more tax money to scientists anyway, so what do you expect them to do -- house the mice in the fucking ritz on their own dime (which ain't much)? So if you don't like the way it's done, go live in some third world country with no drugs and no benefits learned from the research done on mice and see how much you like it when you're dying of some fucked up disease.

    3. Re:Abused mice... by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Ahem. I knew a girl who worked in a lab on her way to becoming a doctor. They were working on nerve damage and regeneration.

      So to damage the nerves of the mice (or rats...I forget) she would break their spines.

      They're lab mice. Their soul purpose for existing is to be experimented on. Giving them cancer, etc is not treating them decently.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    4. Re:Abused mice... by Some+Woman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      what do you expect them to do -- house the mice in the fucking ritz on their own dime (which ain't much)?

      There are ways to ensure that your lab animals have a pleasant environment without spending a lot of money. When I worked in the animal facility at my college, they had many small rooms instead of one large room. I don't know how sensitive to overcrowding mice and rats are, but we usually had no more than 40 rats in any given room (1 large or 2 small per cage excepting for nursing mothers).

      Another consideration is the level and quality of stimuli. If the animals are kept in an environment with loud noises or bright lights, they might not respond too kindly. Also- were the animals in the article subject to frequent playful human contact (not of the latex glove variety)? Part of my job was to play with the animals so that they wouldn't become attention deprived.

      All I know is that I never observed this "psychotic" behavior in our lab rats and mice, so something had to be working.

      --
      My dingo ate your honor student.
    5. Re:Abused mice... by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 1

      While it would certainly be preferable for animal subjects to get extra attention and stimuli, this would be a very difficult task for large universities or research centers, which typically have thousands and thousands of mice. No University would allocate money for a position to "play with the mice" (with the exception probably of work study students in psych departments), not to mention it would take a lot of people to interact with all of the mice on frequent occasions. I have observed psychotic behavior (a memorable occasion was a mouse that ran the exact same path around it's cage over and over, very fast), but very rarely. Of course, I don't check on the mice at night, so who knows what they're up to then. Also, an issue at medical research institutions is contamination - the more people are coming and going out of an environment that is supposed to be sterile will increase the likelihood of bringing in some "bugs" that will get the mice sick and skew experiment results.

    6. Re:Abused mice... by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      Actually, a lone mouse is more stressed than a mouse put with other mice. I'm one of the "fucking assholes" that work with mice, and have for about 7 years. You have obviously never been in an animal facility, and have never even glanced at the guidelines for rodent housing. The only time you have a dozen animals in a small area is when 11 of them are less than weaning age (and it's uncommon for a litter to get that big).

      If you have just 5 mice in one cage, you get nasty notes from the care staff. If you leave unweaned animals in there too long, you not only adversely affect your research and hurt the animals you work so hard on, you also get fined.

      and need some private space

      Don't be so antropomorhic (sp?). Mice hate being alone, they dislike privacy. Look at them in the wild; they live in concentracted packs. In the cages, they get stressed when alone.

      As for the behaviours, yes, the mice do act wierd. They overgroom each other to the point of massive hair loss. The males can get very aggressive, seriously hurting or killing each other. They run around the cage for no apparent reason. They dig in the bedding. They chew on the cage bars. They spend a large portion of their day doing this. This contrasts sharply with what they do in the wild, where they groom each other in large groups, males fight for breeding rights, run from predators and to food sources, dig burrows, and chew on things to keep their teeth filed down.

      Oh yeah...forgot the sarcasm tags....

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    7. Re:Abused mice... by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      were the animals in the article subject to frequent playful human contact

      You're joking, right? Please god tell me you're fucking joking. They're MICE. They're going to be shot full of some god-awful chemical to see if they grow giant throbbing tumors. Someone is planning to shoot Clairol into their eyes just to see what happens next. They will have their heads shaved and opened wide so we can poke their naked brains with wires. All the play-time in the fucking world isn't going to make them happy, well-adjusted woodland bunnies.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    8. Re:Abused mice... by Some+Woman · · Score: 1

      It doesn't do anybody any good to have psychotic lab mice. If they need human contact (once a week per animal was our minimum) in order to retain their sanity, consider that a cost of experimentation. Your data isn't going to be any good if the subjects are under unnecessary stress. (It's been fairly well demonstrated that psychological conditions affect physical health, and anything else you might want to study.)

      --
      My dingo ate your honor student.
    9. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1

      Bike. You and your Bike. I dunno how it came out "block". Maybe I was going for "bike around the block".

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    10. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      God, you should go read a book about mice, you fucking asshole.

      Mice need a place to hide. They do not like overcrowding.

      When they are kept apart, they do not get more stressed. Yes, when they can smell other mice but not see them-- what you'd do in the poor lab conditions you guys keep-- that would stress them. But being alone isn't inherently stressful.

      But you're right about one thing-- you are one of those fucking assholes abusing mice. And so typical of slashdot, you have no morality and so you think nothing of it. Go to hell.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    11. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      Hey, I'm all for scientific researhc-- that is research not funded by tax money. Its that tax money research that produces no drugs, you silly person.

      Abusing mice isn't a good way to test drugs, better to treat them decently... this doesn't require the mouse-ritz, just rational caging and a intro-to-veterinary school understanding of hte animal you're fucking observing. That should not be too much to ask.

      But, invariably, it is thoe government funded, poorly thought out, mice abusing hellholes that treat them so poorly.

      By the way, I HAVE seen what goes on in a research lab. I guess you haven't, but that doesnt' stop you from calling me "uninformed" ... for pointing out mice behaviour.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    12. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1

      Damn, but that is a good counter example. 40 rats to a room (if by room you mean 20inch by 20 inch box) is too many, but you could mean a much bigger room.

      Typical for these labs is about 40 mice to a 18 inc by 24 inch cage.... and that is far too many... they can't even find ground to stand on some of them, because they more than cover the floor of the cage.

      Glad to hear you played with them... I think rats need that more than mice.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    13. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      You're contradicting yourself... you advocate overcrowding to "save money" and at the same time worry about contaminating the mice?

      Overcrowding causes sick mice-- hell that's the subject of the freaking article!

      You're a mouse abuser and you should be subjected to the same abuse. There's no reason for it-- your complaints about "Cost" are the typical excuse to justify laziness.

      Its extremely cheap to provide mice with sufficient space and facilities to lead a reasonable life-- and your research results would be more consistent, too!

      I'm not of the touchy-feely environmentalist type, on the contrary, I'm a pure capitalist... but I'm starting to think that peta has a case here....

      You take on mice, you also take on the moral responsibility to treat them well. Since mice (And other animals) are not sentient, they don't have the right to life and other human rights we enjoy-- but when you take them out of their natural environment, you do take responsibility for their lives.

      And frankly, there are very few cases where tortur- er- experimenting on mice are justified. Computer simulation is more effective, and using mice should be the last step.

      Not the first one.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    14. Re:Abused mice... by Some+Woman · · Score: 1

      By room I mean a closed off room that holds a fraction of the animal cages instead of a large lab area housing all of the animals. It's a little cosier, plus they aren't disturbed at night. Each cage was 8 inches by 12 inches and only held one or two adult rats (or 4 mice).

      I think rats need that more than mice.

      The rats were actually handled on a schedule (at least once per week per animal) because they need attention more than mice, while people would play with the mice at their convenience.

      --
      My dingo ate your honor student.
    15. Re:Abused mice... by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      you have no morality and so you think nothing of it. Go to hell.

      Talk about typical of Slashdot.....

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    16. Re:Abused mice... by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that a mouse behaves normally as a result of human contact? Jesus, I must have a whole front yard full of dangerously insane squirrels.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    17. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, I know what I'm talking about. The typical slashdot poster-- yourself-- has no clue.

      You should realize that there are people out there that actually have experience in the subject. Not all of us are idiot script kiddies like yourself.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    18. Re:Abused mice... by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 1
      First off, if you think in silico experiments have reached a place where they are more informative than in situ experiments than you clearly don't much about science.

      In response to your other points, researchers don't just simply stick as many mice together as possible. What we do is governed by rules and overseen by the government. For example, we don't put more than four male mice in one cage (about the size of a size 10 shoe box) or five female mice. Furthermore, crowding (if it were to occur, which it doesn't) of mice within facilites that are germ free is not going to lead to disease -- because there are no agents to cause disease unless people bring it in because of poor sterile technique. If you think space is cheap, you're completely wrong. You think it's cheap to house mice in a sterile envrionment? Try again. I can't speak for other researchers, but the mice we use are hardly tortured. They eat all they want, they aren't hunted, and they die quickly and painlessly. Not to mention, these mice wouldn't live an hour in the wild, they simply don't have the instincts -- if they escape a cage, they just sit in the middle of the floor sniffing, they aren't even afraid of people.

      But let's face it, there will always be people that disagree with using animals for research. i won't lie, I like the mice and would prefer not to use them, but we simply are not at a place where we have any other options at this point. I think the opportunity to learn something about how biology works is worth the price. You should think about that the next time you take some medicine, as you swallow the pill, taking for granted the whole time all of the animals that died in order for that medicine to be made, and all of the thousands of hours of work that scientists put into it.

    19. Re:Abused mice... by spokes · · Score: 1

      Mice are like any common pet-- they react to pain, can be scared, can be stressed and need some private space.

      I apreciate the point you're making, but wouldn't it be more effective to compare mice with US? Us humans. We, too, react to pain, can be scared, can be stressed and need some private space. We mammals are all pretty similar in those ways.

    20. Re:Abused mice... by spokes · · Score: 1

      When I worked in the animal facility at my college, they had many small rooms instead of one large room. I don't know how sensitive to overcrowding mice and rats are, but we usually had no more than 40 rats in any given room (1 large or 2 small per cage ...)

      I can't help finding it odd that you would describe a room full of cages a "pleasant environment".

    21. Re:Abused mice... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > They're MICE. [ ... ] All the play-time in the fucking world isn't going to make them happy, well-adjusted woodland bunnies.

      They're MICE. It takes serious gene spicing to turn 'em into woodland bunnies, happy or not.

    22. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      If you think you've presented an argument ,you don't know anyhting about logic.

      Clearly you're not a scientist...

      But I do find it amusing that two people who claim to be working in labs are calling me uninformed and saying exactly opposite things!

      But your ignorance is pretty wide an deep- mice don't have instincts? You don't even know what instincts are?

      Why is slashdot full of idiotsl ike you? Where do the people who actually learned to think hang out? I want to go there.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    23. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1

      The difference is we are capable of reason, and animals are not.

      Thus, animals do not have human rights. But that does not mean that any human who abusese animals-- as the other people in this thread advocate-- is guilt free.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    24. Re:Abused mice... by spokes · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure why our capability to reason merits us so many exclusive rights, when many of those rights have absolutely nothing to to with reason. I'm also not sure there's such a precise quality called reason which, we can assert, all humans surely have and all nonhumans surely lack. Must one know the price of tea in China to suffer from being locked up in a cage?

      Here's a favorite quote of mine from Richard Dawkins, who expresses my feelings very nicely on the subject.

      "I'd worry about the humanist label if it implied something uniquely special about being human. Evolution is a gradual process. Humanness is not an all-or-none quality that you either have or don't have. It is a complicated mixture of qualities that evolved gradually, which means that some people have higher doses than others, and some nonhumans have non-negligible doses as well. Absolutist moral judgments founded on the "rights" of all humans, as opposed to nonhumans, therefore seem to me less justifiable than more pragmatic judgments based, for example, on quantitative assessment of the ability to suffer."

    25. Re:Abused mice... by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 1
      Clearly you don't take the time read into the meanings of statements. Of course when I said the mice the don't have the instincts I didn't mean they don't have any instincts. Regardless of semantics, these mice do not behave like wild mice. Period.

      As far as idiots on slashdot, why don't you try and write something that actually contributes to the discussion instead of just being a troll? If you could stop trying to show off what you know about philosphy and simply look at what I wrote it would be obvious to you (or should be) that I know a fair amount about science. You clearly do not. Yet I don't sit here claiming to know anything about philosophy. If you think slashdot is full of idiots, your leaving the boards would begin to relieve that problem.

    26. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      With reason you can make decisions and take responsibility for your actions. Without reason, you cannot, you are acting in an instinctual manner.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    27. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      Excpet that with every post, I make my case, I prove it, etc.

      You are apparently just able to call me names. Not even original ones at that.

      Boring.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    28. Re:Abused mice... by spokes · · Score: 1

      So that's why humans are entitled to so many more fundamental privileges than nonhumans? Because we "can make decisions" and take responsibility for our actions? What about those humans who heavily rely on their instincts? What about infants and mentally handicapped people who are incapable of "reason"? And what about nonhumans that have the ability to learn and remember, and can alter their future actions accordingly? Are they not making decisions?

      What you've proposed is a false dilemma, where one either a) has the capability to make decisions, or b) acts instinctually. It's not zero-sum: making decisions and taking responsibility IS instinctual for a great many species, including humans.

      I'm sorry, but your handwaiving is no substitute for argument.

    29. Re:Abused mice... by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      Strawman.

      I made an argument. All you did was wave your hands and reference a logical fallacy that does not apply. Not only did you fail to address my argument, you misrepresented it in order to knock it down.

      I suggest you read up a bit on this. I would start with Atlas Shrugged. When you've read that, you'll understand.

      IF you want to make a counter argument, feel free to do so. But you have not done so. The logic in my argument still stands.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
  16. Reminds me of... by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hanging from the top of the cage - you mean, like a pull-up?

    Turning backflips...

    "Now this one's a strange case. She claim a machine from the future, called a Terminator, came back to kill her."
    Hiya Doc. How's the knee.

    1. Re:Reminds me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing....damn she's hot doing pull-ups in her cell with that crazed look...muahaha

  17. Maybe they're bored out of their little skulls? by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gnawing on the top of the cage is a lot more fun than gnawing on the sides. Mice have to gnaw on something hard to cut their teeth - otherwise they get too big - rodent teeth grow continuously. As for backflips, well, if you could do backflips all afternoon, and you had nothing better to do, would you or would you not do backflips?

    These mice aren't crazy. They just need some entertainment!

    1. Re:Maybe they're bored out of their little skulls? by ndogg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, definitely. Those mice need internet access so they can access all the mice pr0n out there. Maybe they could even grow their tails a little longer with some of the stuff out there.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    2. Re:Maybe they're bored out of their little skulls? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      These mice aren't crazy. They just need some entertainment!

      We tried playing Britney Spears for them, but they all died.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Maybe they're bored out of their little skulls? by spokes · · Score: 1

      These mice aren't crazy. They just need some entertainment!

      That prisoner clawing at the wall in solitary confinement isn't crazy, he just needs some entertainment!

  18. ...causes cancer in laboratory rats. by Serra · · Score: 5, Funny

    There was a point in the article when it occured to me that the phrase, "Research causes cancer in laboratory rats." was not a joke.

  19. Proper Lab Procedure by Deanasc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is to handle each mouse weekly so that handling during experiments doesn't stress them out. I've been in rooms of hundreds of mice caged 3 to a feederbox and sorted by age and sex. The behaviors mentioned are few and far between unless they're beeing inbred or are knock outs that are more prone to psychosis.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    1. Re:Proper Lab Procedure by spokes · · Score: 1

      I've been in rooms of hundreds of mice caged 3 to a feederbox and sorted by age and sex. The behaviors mentioned are few and far between...

      Well that's what this scientist thought too, until he put cameras on them during the night, when mice are active by nature. When you were in the room, they just wanted to go back to sleep!

  20. boo by lemody · · Score: 2, Funny

    'boo the space hamster' wasn't nuts. only his (her?) owner was!

    --


    class he-man extends man!
    1. Re:boo by AceJohnny · · Score: 1

      what about Harvey the Wonder Hamster, and HIS master?

      --
      Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  21. "We send lab mice" - er I don't by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    let the mice go

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  22. Freedom! by jlehtira · · Score: 1

    It seems the sense of freedom is important for all animals alike. Humans and mice. I'd react quite strongly to being locked into a room for a long time. Sure I'd try to escape. Sure It'd turn into an "escape ritual" if it'd be hopeless. Sure I'd be digging the tunnel, even though I "knew" It'd never work.

    Prison is far better. People can have hobbies and visitors etc etc.

    Sure the mice are acting crazy. But does that mean they'd have a permanent mental flaw? I don't think so. I believe the craziness arises from the situation, and will go away if these mice would be let free, roaming in the forests.

    I once had three gerbils. Sure they'd be trying to escape whenever they had the chance, but that seemed as a sport. I always kept some cardboard tube, boxes, carrots, branches and whatever there to keep them busy. Changed the "furnishings" every now and then. And let the gerbils run free in one room quite often. Actually even built mazes for them from LEGOs =). They seemed healthy and sound. I miss them.

    Animals should be treated properly to get any sane information about their behavior. And, they should be living in their natural environment (which, when different from that of humans, will make the info less useful). I think lab mice or lab-anything is not the way psychology will get good results. It's simply cruel.

  23. This isn't very surprising... by DarkDust · · Score: 4, Informative

    and I bet this applies to rats as well (which are, biological, just very big mice). I have some pet rats and a big cage, but normally they just run around in my living room... and they really love to run around.

    When I have them in their cage for more than, say, three days they grab their bars like some prisoners and stare at me with very sad eyes :-) After some days they can really get depressed.

    So now normally mice and rat cages in laboratories are way smaller than mine is (I know since a friend of mine works in a laboratory with rats). And they are not allowed to run around. When my rats get depressed after a few days, then I have no doubt most mice/rats get crazy after some months.

    Imagine having nothing more than your living room to walk around, your whole life... oh wait, we geeks know that very well ;-)

    1. Re:This isn't very surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you... Now I miss my old rat :(

    2. Re:This isn't very surprising... by JoeGee · · Score: 1

      Petunia, my rat, lives in my computer room. She is my company when I'm working. She's very fond of people, and of my three cats -- she loves chasing them. Your pix of Miriel and Arwen made me grab Petunia and snuggle with her for a few minutes. Rats really can be extraordinary little creatures.

      --

      Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
    3. Re:This isn't very surprising... by DarkDust · · Score: 1

      Petunia, my rat, lives in my computer room. She is my company when I'm working. She's very fond of people, and of my three cats -- she loves chasing them. Your pix of Miriel and Arwen made me grab Petunia and snuggle with her for a few minutes. Rats really can be extraordinary little creatures.

      Yes, they are... the only drawback is their short lifespan. We had to euthanize Miriel about six weeks ago but got two other rats before, so Arwen wouldn't be alone. :-(

      But they are so lovely friends that I don't like to miss having rats in my house :-)

    4. Re:This isn't very surprising... by anubi · · Score: 1
      My experience with rodents is that they need to nibble on everything they can sink their teeth into. This includes your electronic stuff. Especially cabling.

      And leave their body wastes whenever the spirit moves them.

      It just seemed to me that a rodent was a furry little beast with a destructive mauler at one end, and a dispenser of messy fluids and smelly goo at the other end, and incorporated a ingenious little transportation mechanism that could get it into all sorts of areas very difficult for me to get into for repair and/or clean out.

      Needless to say, my experience with rodents ( rats in my garden shed ) was not a good one, and led me to acquire a couple of cats.

      Obviously, if you are keeping some in the house on purpose, there is something about rodent psychology I completely missed out on.

      If you didn't keep 'em caged, how did you handle the inevitable mess?

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    5. Re:This isn't very surprising... by DarkDust · · Score: 1

      My experience with rodents is that they need to nibble on everything they can sink their teeth into. This includes your electronic stuff. Especially cabling.

      Yes, they do like cables :-) But they don't like every cable. I haven't figured out why, but they don't touch some cables and like to bite some others. Must be the plastic that's used for them... luckily my cables don't look like the ones from your link, my rats normally don't bite through cables, they just remove the plastic so a bit of tape does the job.

      And leave their body wastes whenever the spirit moves them.

      Luckily, rats normally don't do that (at least the ones a had and have as pets): they have one place where they drop their waste, and if you know that one and clean it regularly it's no big problem.

      Obviously, if you are keeping some in the house on purpose, there is something about rodent psychology I completely missed out on.

      Well, rats are very intelligent (for rodents, that is :-) and I find them very cute (my girlfriend as well). Most people don't like their naked tails, but imagine the tail to be furry: it would look almost like a squirrel, and most people find those rather cute :-) They are interesting to watch since they have very visible characters, like dogs: some a brave, others not, some like to cuddle, others not, some like to climb and jumb, etc... and some are very very clever when it comes to stealing your food ;-) And they are normally quite active, which makes them fun to watch... I've never understood why hamsters are so popular. They look quite cute but are rather boring rodents, sleeping even more than I do.

      If you didn't keep 'em caged, how did you handle the inevitable mess?

      Well, if you mean "how do you keep them from nibbling on your furniture" and stuff: I don't. We knew from the very beginning that our sofa will be eaten, so we bought a cheep one :-) And that's about the most mess they do, luckily. That's like accepting that your cats have to whet their claws one some furniture. But because you really like your pet you live with it.

  24. Tip of the iceberg.. by deggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This kind of thing is happening all the time and increasingly so around the world.
    A few years ago a lab in the UK admitted that most of it's results were flawed because of some permanent contamination within it's main testing machine, and they had been for several years.
    I also remember a case where cells grown in culture and used around the world were discovered to be the wrong kind (liver instead of lung?) after the research had been going on for 10 years or so, wasting billions in money and years of work.
    It's unherently unsound doing research on a captive, interbread population. You wouldn't trust it in humans - so why is it OK in animals and cultures?

    1. Re:Tip of the iceberg.. by NekoXP · · Score: 2, Informative

      > It's unherently unsound doing research on a
      > captive, interbread population. You wouldn't
      > trust it in humans - so why is it OK in animals
      > and cultures?

      Being captive and interbred means you can control
      and predict certain factors of the research, which
      is pretty essential in research.

      If you had 100 randomly born mice and tried to
      test a cancer drug on them, probably a very small
      number of them would get cancer before they died
      at the end of their very, very short lives.

      If you engineer 100 mice to be prone to nasty,
      guaranteed tumours, you waste less time, and more
      importantly, waste less mice :)

    2. Re:Tip of the iceberg.. by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      Besides just being suspiciously vague and unlikely, and being completely unsupported by any citation whatsoever, neither of your examples have even a little bit to do with the article. A lab machine was contaminated? Somebody ordered the wrong kind of cells for ten years running, on a project with, apparently, hundreds of millions of dollars in annual funding?

      Um, yeah.

      And this is related to psycho mice how, again?

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  25. Possible solution? by clambake · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would think it would be possible to build a plastic maze with slowly shifting walls. Built into the maze would be sensors that shift the walls of the maze when there are no mice in that area. Then you drop all your mice in different areas and there you go, endless halways to run through. The mice don't ever even have to cross paths, so it's just like a cage, but it is never the same twice so there is always something to do. Sometimes mice would be herded into a "play room", sometimes to a "food room", etc. No more crazymice. It would also be neat to watch in action.

    1. Re:Possible solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen the movie Cube? Same idea, but using humans and a 3D maze. They all went batty...

    2. Re:Possible solution? by TCQuad · · Score: 1

      I would think it would be possible to build a plastic maze with slowly shifting walls.

      Right, because the way to make sure the cooped-up mice don't go crazy is to literally have the walls closing in on them.

    3. Re:Possible solution? by clambake · · Score: 1

      "The Cube", if you recall, also had death traps. I have a suspiscion that there may be a link there.

    4. Re:Possible solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what good is a maze without a bunch of death traps???

    5. Re:Possible solution? by clambake · · Score: 1

      Well, what good is a maze without a bunch of death traps???

      True, true.

    6. Re:Possible solution? by spokes · · Score: 1

      I can't think of a better way to drive a mammal crazy. Honestly, could you imagine yourself living in such a place as you describe?!

      How about some dirt, vegetation, and some social interaction? At least something like a zoo enclosure that vaguely attempts to imitate the animals' natural environment.

  26. I had two mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that would run really fast, in a really tight circle (like a dog chasing it's tail) for several minutes at a time. Most of the time, it was in the same direction (ie. clockwise, etc.) but sometimes they'd switch directions. Then I fed them to my reptiles. The end.

  27. Only me? by Mopatop · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the other side of the cage, a second mouse performs backflips, one per second, for up to 30 minutes at a time.

    Did anyone else think of making a clock with this

    Only me? Okay then...

  28. easy fix by AssFace · · Score: 3, Funny

    The mice are just bored.

    If you want to give them something to do, just put a housecat in there with them.

    QED

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  29. Re:Sometimes /. readers make me wonder.... by aug24 · · Score: 1
    How some stories can make past their rejection process....but anyways...

    How some people can miss the point of an article so wildly... but anyway...

    since this was done in the dark and the mouse didn't know that it was "stainless steel" bar, it was probably trying to escape...

    They continued to do this activity for hour upon hour, day upon day, week upon week. While you might have a point for that one stereotypic behaviour trait, the same observation doesn't work for mouse back-flipping or running in circles.

    The authors are not stupid, they are scientists, and they have considered whether or not that was escape activity and written about it in the article. Please try reading the whole thing before hitting 'post'.

    J.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  30. good for some, bad for others by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Having worked in a lab that uses mice for more than 2 years now I found this articel particularly interesting (immunology research). I've noticed odd behavior in our mice before - such as running in circles or pulling their fur out - but it seems to occur most predominantly when mice are housed alone.

    It is certainly important to gain more insight into this issue, but it is a very complicated one. The vast majority of researchers are fairly limited in funding, and the costs of maintaining colonies of mice is already very expensive (for example, at my institution caring for about 300-500 mice is around $4000-$5000 per month). While there is probably much validity to Wurbel's argument, it unfortunately becomes a question of cost -- enriched housing conditions would probably be out of the limits of most researchers budgets. Scientists should probably settle on a happy medium - those doing research into behavior should definitely consider these issues; however, they may be less essential for researchers trying to understand the functions of specific genes known to be involved in processes other than neural ones, because the cost would simply be too high.

    1. Re:good for some, bad for others by fygment · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...they may be less essential for researchers trying to understand the functions of specific genes known to be involved in processes other than neural ones ...

      However, that assumes the researchers understand all the variables involved. For example, reports keep coming out about the link between stress and depressed immune response. Thus studying a disease on stressed mice would actually skew your results. Gene function may be susceptible to environmental triggers of which stress and madness might be factors. The fact is, we don't know and can't know without very rigorous control over both the experimental procedure and the test subjects. So the cost benefits of housing mice on the cheap may well be mitigated by completely invalid experimental data. And that is no cost saving at all.

      --
      "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
    2. Re:good for some, bad for others by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 1

      I never meant to suggest that stress would not affect things like immune responses. My point was that, as sort of a cost/benefit analysis, it wouldn't make sense for many researchers to take the steps to give mice more interactive environments. Keep in mind that I'm viewing the issue in a reductionist manner. For example, I am interested in what gene X does. So I ablate its function in some mice but not others. All of the mice will be in the same environment, and therefore will be effected the same by lack of stimuli, or whatever. Therefore, I can directly compare mice with a normal gene X to mice who don't have gene X. If there is a difference, regardless of what effect the environment has on the mice, I have learned something about the possible function of gene X.

  31. Staring at this screen... by jpsst34 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...all day causes repetitive behaviour.

    Oooh! New story on /. The article is too long.
    Oooh! New story on /. The article is too long.
    Oooh! New story on /. The article is too long.
    Oooh! New story on /. The article is too long.
    ...

    --
    How are you going to keep them down on the farm once they've seen Karl Hungus?
  32. The same thing we do every night Pinky... by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1

    I think WB must have done a similar study before creating Pinky & The Brain. Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight? The same thing we do every night Pinky... Backflips and chew on the bars!!

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  33. Pacing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This behavor is also seen in zoo animals, but instead they pace around their surroundings.

  34. personal experience by chloroquine · · Score: 1
    I don't work with mice, but I'd like to point out that back in the old days (a couple of years ago) when I worked at NIH, our living conditions were worse than those of the lab animals. We had less space per animal by a long shot, and the air quality was much worse. Our work conditions weren't regulated by OSHA.

    I know I sure saw some behavior that could be characterized as psychotic. There was definite pacing in small circles. Running around and shouting happened frequently. Repetitive behaviors such as pipetting samples into 96 well plates were not unusual.

    Now I work at another research institute and while some of the behaviors seen at NIH are common here, it is much more sane. (well, not normal, but better than NIH, fer sure).

    If you're interested in lab animal care, there are a large number of sites that detail it to death. The government is a good place to start, of course.

  35. The surprise is at the bottom of the article... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is one of the best articles I've read in a long time, and I'm sure I'll have an intelligent comment later. But for now, here's this summary:

    mouse
    mice mice mice mice mice
    mouse
    mice mice mice mice mice
    mouse
    mice mice mice mice mice
    mouse
    mice mice mice mice mice
    mouse
    mice mice mice mice mice
    mouse
    mice mice mice mice mice
    mouse
    mice mice mice mice mice
    mouse

    And at the bottom:
    © Copyright 2003 The Walt Disney Company

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  36. And I fear that I' by krysith · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Don't know the date
    Don't know the time
    The lab rats are insane
    And I fear that I'll be next..."

    -The Changelings "Parallax"

  37. Psychologists versus ethologists by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...which is why there is a cultural divide between two approaches to the study of animal behavior.

    The "American psychological tradition," exemplified by Watson, Lashley, B. F. Skinner, etc. emphasizes the study of animals which are almost domesticated for lab use, and bred for genetic uniformity. The studies are done under carefully "controlled" laboratory conditions which are highly unnatural for the animal. The positive aspect of this approach is that it fits well with the scientific method, and the studies are relatively easy to interpret and repeat. A lot of the studies tend to be directed at intelligence and problem-solving.

    Unfortunately, the behavior of animals in captivity IS just plain weird. I'd never seen it described as "psychotic" before, but there is a certain Heisenberg-like effect: the effort to put animals in situations where their behavior can be studied with full scientific rigor causes their behavior to change.

    The "ethological tradition," exemplified by Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, Donald Griffin, etc. emphasizes the behavior of natural populations of animals in natural or naturalistic settings. It is a biologist's approach rather than a psychologist's, and emphasizes evolutionary relationships. Social aspects are perhaps studied more than problem-solving.

    Ethology may be a little softer and less rigorous. In the last decade, the phrase "cognitive ethology" has come into vogue and you will find cognitive ethologists using the word "consciousness" out loud and unafraid.

    Obviously my personal sympathies are with the ethologists, but both traditions have yielded valuable scientific results.

    1. Re:Psychologists versus ethologists by arete · · Score: 1

      I have a real difficulty with your use of the phrase "American psychological tradition" there. I'd suggest that Skinner would say people could easily be reinforced and trained if you could find reasonable reinforcers, like their animal counterparts. Of course, this is an affront to everyone's concept of free will.

      On the other hand, what I would consider to be the "American psychological tradition" at the moment seems to say that people can't be controlled and therefore that you shouldn't try. So things like phonics are deemed useless by extension.

      I certainly think that animal behavior observed in situ using a strong numeric method is better than some obscure case. However, using a bad method makes both of them useless at best and dangerous at worst, and the difficulty of repeating it lends itself especially well to being tainted by the researcher's prejudice.

      At least in Skinner's experiments you knew reliably that weird mice like X in Y situation did Z.

      Check carefully to make sure the best possible repeatable result isn't "situation strongly tends to evoke the idea of and papers about "K" in researchers from "J" society" I think this is tricky but not impossible to avoid, especially in a natural setting.

      Sometimes there is value in such a study, but not science. It might at least give you an idea where to focus some science, for instance. Or it might win you a grant to do that science. : )

      --
      Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  38. "...most breed quite well" by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    You noted: Then, what would you do if we added Natalie Portman to your island?? (hot grits included) Yea, that's what I thought.

    Oddly enough, that's just what the dissenter quoted in the article said:

    "There are differences in behavior between mice raised in standard versus enriched housing, but which are 'better' or 'normal' cannot be straightforwardly answered. Mus musculus, the house mouse, has been raised in 'barren' laboratory cages for hundreds of generations, where most breed quite well, and it should at least be considered that this caging condition is, in some sense, their natural habitat."

    Following that line of reasoning, the "natural habitat" for the average Slashdotter would be just as you suggested: a 10x10 meter island with a coconut tree, hot grits, and Natalie Portman.

    So, where do we sign up?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  39. What I am really afraid of... by jat2 · · Score: 1

    is that they will become smart and read the "lift latch to open" sign on their cages. Then there will be a little paw sticking out of a cage and opening it. Next thing you know, you'll have a race of intelligent rats and mice living in your rose bush stealing electricity from your house, causing all kinds of trouble for you and your cat Dragon. It's all prophesized here.

    1. Re:What I am really afraid of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they would have to evolve opposable thumbs to do this...

  40. They hope we think their crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They hope we think their crazy so we won't kill them with some other medical experiment.

  41. They are not crazy by vuud · · Score: 1


    In another recent experiment that has been going on for decades, companys have taken human beings and placed them in small boxes which surround and cramp them on three sides, while leaving one side and the top open for observation.

    No final results have been released, but it seems that they only surf the internet, make personal phone calls and perform friviolus actions of e-mails.

    Making the boxes smaller seem to have no effect on the overall productivity of the cubical dwelling humans.

  42. It's fairly obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stressed mice make less rigorous models for all kinds of research. Far from an animal rights issue, this is a very serious problem when they are being used as human models. I value human lives much more than mouse lives, but it should be self-evident, at least in this case, that less stressful housing for lab mice might improve the quality (and length!) of human lives farther down the road.

  43. One more thing... by weeboo0104 · · Score: 2

    Please remember to put some flowers on Algernons grave.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  44. Response from the troll community. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    As a former member of the Slashdot troll community I'd like to make some clarifications and comments here.

    I'm sure they spend about half their time in front of the computer either reading, posting, or thinking of new offensive, off-topic things to say on slashdot.

    I wouldn't say the number is that high. I would venture that most trolls only recycle content from other trolls. This eliminates the time dedicated to this phase significantly. Consider the sources.

    You mean like hitting "refresh" on the slashdot home page every 1-2 minutes so they can get first post?

    That may be so, but there are frequently breaks between these 1-2 minute refreshes to pee, get something to drink, and maybe even do some work.

    The entire day of these creatures is wildly altered by something as simple as a fellow slashdotter replying to their message, not realizing it wasn't serious.

    Mod-bombing a troll also has a similar effect on the troll's psychology. The event of a mod-bombing causes a serious chemical imbalance in the troll which prompts it to spew even more trolls across the message boards.

  45. for the gnawing by phorm · · Score: 1

    Rodents will gnaw on cage bars, etc, in order to keep their teeth filed down. If not, they can grow too long, or get ingrown I believe, which can be painful and sometimes fatal if not treated. For rodents that are in a cage without bars (aquarium glass, or whatever) I recommend making sure they have a block to chew on. Per stores tend to carry them

    Oh, and as a side-note... falling of the top was probably just the result of a thing called gravity. Even an agile rodent hanging off their would get heady/tired after awhile I would think?