Slashdot Mirror


Bamboo Bike A Reality

markjugg writes "The American Bamboo Society has a page describing a working bamboo bike. This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable, expecially in contrast to aluminum, one of the most resource demanding materials that exist."

90 of 467 comments (clear)

  1. strength of bamboo by mandalayx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before you say that bamboo is weak and easily dismembered, here's a quote from the article:

    But Flavio makes me see things differently: Bamboo is a resource of immense potential. And it is strong too. What makes it possible to build bicycles from it is that it is stronger than steel when strained in the longitudinal direction, 17% to be exact.

    The main point of the article, of course, is that bamboo is much more environmentally friendly than metals while being extraordinarily plentiful.

    1. Re:strength of bamboo by gwernol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Before you say that bamboo is weak and easily dismembered, here's a quote from the article:

      "But Flavio makes me see things differently: Bamboo is a resource of immense potential. And it is strong too. What makes it possible to build bicycles from it is that it is stronger than steel when strained in the longitudinal direction, 17% to be exact."


      While resistence to longitudinal stress is a good thing, many of the strains on the frame of a bike are not longitudinal - there is a lot of lateral flexing as you pedal. Bamboo is prone to splitting and fracturing when under lateral strain. I would really hate to have one of those collapse under me due to lateral stress fractures. All those sharp slivers of bamboo right under my crotch? No thanks...

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    2. Re:strength of bamboo by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before you say that bamboo is weak and easily dismembered [snip] What makes it possible to build bicycles from it is that it is stronger than steel when strained in the longitudinal direction, 17% to be exact.

      Yes, but steel/aluminum won't rot, won't get eaten by bugs, are stronger in NON-logitudinal directions(ie, twisting- think about when you pump the pedals holding the handlebars, yes, you're twisting pieces of the frame!)...and when they fail, they (usually) just bend. Bamboo cracks, and then it just disintegrates.

    3. Re:strength of bamboo by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      holy crap! well, I guess I'll have to make sure to tell all my biking buddies to make sure that all strain exerted on their bikes is "in the longitudinal direction," versus the normal strains that are put on bikes (twists, various directions, etc).

      And next time I'm hit by an suv while riding a bike, I'll be sure glad the bike shattered into bits instead of staying in one relative piece!

      Did the people who did this previous work in MS's "innovation" department???

    4. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but steel/aluminum won't rot, won't get eaten by bugs

      Hmmm yes, what we really need is an environmentally friendly biodegradable substance that won't rot or get eaten by bugs. Best of both worlds.

    5. Re:strength of bamboo by Jahf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is very little chance of that based on the way they are using the sticks. No drilling or cutting means the pole remains very stable. Sure, if you use it for extreme biking you're going to have problems, but otherwise it should remain quite solid.

      Add to that the possibility of very simple reinforcement by wrapping it at key points with a strong thread and/or laminating it with reinforcements and I doubt it would break under normal usage.

      Even if it did, you would see signs of wear before it happened. What causes catastrophic failure of bamboo is usually force being applied on bamboo that has been cut into the grain and/or had holes cut into it.

      Of course, that doesn't stop it from being fugly ... I would definitely be getting out some paint!

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    6. Re:strength of bamboo by jackalope · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's it! The cheese whiz bicycle! Won't rot, won't get eaten, and plentiful too!

    7. Re:strength of bamboo by Ed+Avis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bamboo canes are hollow, right? So just use aluminium rods with bamboo cladding round the outside. You get a strong and stable bike, and still get all the eco-friendly posing opportunities. It's not as if anyone will try to cut the bamboo open to see if you're cheating.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:strength of bamboo by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure it is funny, but the bamboo society is missing a fundenmental point...

      I disagree with this non-environmental friendly stuff regarding Aluminum and Steel. These two metals are some of most recycled materials that there are. What do you think happens to old ships, cars, buildings? They are not buried, but smelted again.

      In fact this is the beauty of these metals. They can be essentially recycled 100% unlike plastics and papers that always need additives. The reason we do not know about this is because steel and aluminum have been recycled for decades...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    9. Re:strength of bamboo by Maimun · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I wonder what a material scientist would reply to that (I am not one). Steel is not one thing, you know. Neither are bamboo or aluminium alloys, of course.
      • What kind of steel? If the author means ordinary steel in his comparison, for sure high-quality steel would be stronger than bamboo. Mountain bikes, AFAIK, use fairly high quality alloys, be that steel or aluminium.
      • Under what longtitudal force---sorry, I don't know the terms in English---pushing the ends towards each other, or pulling the ends apart? (AFAIK, in the first case the shape of the cross-section is crucial.)
      • Typically, a material under increasing force goes through ellastic transformation (sorry, missing the term again) when the original shape recovers once the force is removed; then plastic transofrmation that leaves permanent damages; then is breaks. So, what is the 17% advantage of bamboo, is it that the rod stays in the ellastic zone under 17% bigger force? Or is it that the force that breaks it is 17% bigger?
      • A bamboo rod has---again, missing the word---"segments" about 30cm long that have "joint" between them. I would think that the joints are the weak point. A steel rod of the type that is found in bikes is has uniform structure, without such joints. Methinks this is an advantage for the metal one.
      • Further, the metal rod can be given appropriate shaping. On my bike for instance, the two rods that go between the stem of the seat post and the rear wheel are bent slightly to the inside at the place where the rear brakes are attached. In this way, they (the rods) bend less (to the outside) when the rear brakes are used. This stiffness means more efficient stopping. If the two rods were made of bamboo, they would be straight and thus more prone to bending to the outside once the brakes are pressed.
    10. Re:strength of bamboo by MrLint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I think the solution is clear. Laminate the bamboo with carbon fiber:)

    11. Re:strength of bamboo by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Add to that the possibility of very simple reinforcement by wrapping it at key points with a strong thread and/or laminating it with reinforcements...

      Once again, duct tape saves my ass (and other stuff).

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    12. Re:strength of bamboo by Wavicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think that's true. According to this greenpeace site, 95% of a ship is recycleable material. Their beef is that these ships are sitting on beaches in asian countries while the non-recyclable 5% of them are pollutants being released into the environment. That and workers dismantling the ships without protection.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    13. Re:strength of bamboo by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 3, Funny
      Hmmm yes, what we really need is an environmentally friendly biodegradable substance that won't rot or get eaten by bugs. Best of both worlds.

      or pandas....
    14. Re:strength of bamboo by klevin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, but what's required in order to refine raw aluminum (or what ever you call the ore)? Lots and lots of electricity. How's that electricity produced? Power plants that: burn coal/natural gas (leading to air pollution), use nuclear fision (all sorts of nasty biproducts that we still haven't figured out what to do with, other than bury them), or hydroelectric dams (don't even get me started here).

      Recycling aluminum & steel reduces the problem, but even that requires large amounts of energy (see above).

    15. Re:strength of bamboo by chriso11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow - the way you phrase that it gives the impression that envirionmentalists are like boogiemen just waiting to leap out at you.

      Actaually, rotting is not as great a problem. Plain wood can last a long time - look at the many hundred+ year old buildings around. Also, redwood is naturally resistant to rot.

      Finally, if you make the bike somewhat modular, it would be possible to periodically replace sections which show any signs of damage or rot.

      My main question, which the article really didn't address (or I misses it), is price. Obviously, the first article must have been expensive. But how low could these get in volume production?

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    16. Re:strength of bamboo by CrowScape · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, we do know what to do with by products of nuclear fission, it's just that when Carter was president he signed a presidential order banning the reclimation of spent fuel rods. Plus, if our youngest plants weren't 30 years old we'd be far more efficient and produce less waste. Japan and France seem to be doing just fine with 80% of their power being derived from nuclear sources.

      So, we can't use oil because of air pollution
      We can't use natural gas because we have to drill for it and build pipelines
      We can't use nuclear because the tiny ammount of byproducts produced over time will be around for a long while.
      We can't use dams because of local environmental concerns (yet we can put up with an over population of beavers doing the same thing)
      We can't use wind because it'll kill endangered birds and the whole "Not in our backyard" mentality
      We can't use tidal generators because it'll kill dolphins

      That leaves us with solar... we're screwed!

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    17. Re:strength of bamboo by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Funny
      That leaves us with solar... we're screwed!

      Well, that's why to choose bamboo. Its very easily produced with solar power...

      --
      This space available.
    18. Re:strength of bamboo by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Informative
      A bamboo rod has---again, missing the word---"segments" about 30cm long that have "joint" between them. I would think that the joints are the weak point.

      clearly you've never touched a piece of bamboo in your life. Those "joints" are stronger than the rest. Incredibly strong. It's vitually impossible to break bamboo there... it breaks in the "segment" first.

      --
      This space available.
    19. Re:strength of bamboo by binarybum · · Score: 4, Funny

      hmm. no, most environmentalists aren't level headed enough to wait to leap out at you. They're usually leaping out before you even get there.

      --
      ôó
    20. Re:strength of bamboo by Avihson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why worry about the glue? All "stick and cloth" aircraft such as the SPAD, Foker, Sopwith, Stearman, etc had spruce wing spars and ribs that were built with animal glue. The glue is stronger than the wood it connects. I wonder what holds all those carbon fibers together in the modern composite bike. Could it be a glue like epoxy?

    21. Re:strength of bamboo by gessel · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think the bamboo bike is really cool from a cost perspective, but it's not really any more renewable than an aluminum one, nor having a net advantageous resource budget despite the obvious, intuitive expectation that it would.

      The matter system on this planet is closed loop.

      While this is not entirely true, some 40,000 tons of space borne dust land on our planet and we may someday mine extra-planetary bodies, for arguments sake all the aluminum we're going to use is here now. If we continue to use it all the bauxite will be gone some day, and from then on, all aluminum will be recycled.

      However, long before that day all aluminum will be recycled because it costs 20X as much to make aluminum from Bauxite as it does to remelt it from scrap. The aluminum industry uses all the scrap aluminum it can get because the final product is just as valuable as aluminum from ore, but the profit is very different.

      So aluminium the matter is a renewable resource, just like the carbon in bamboo, except to reuse aluminum it need merely be remelted via heat (typically electrical power, though a solar furnace could be used), and the carbon in bamboo must be oxidized and reduced (typically by rotting or burning and then photosynthesis).

      Most domestic aluminum production happens in the pacific northwest where the power is provided by dams, a renewable resource, but certainly much of it is provided by oxidizing hydrocarbons to produce CO2 and H2O, both end state products that require substantial energy to reduce to reduce back to something chemically useful. This return cycle of oxidized hydrocarbon energy production is managed by the biomass of the world, and is driven by solar power via photosynthesis at 0.2% net efficiency, just as bamboo production is.

      The energy system on this planet is constant rate

      All energy on this planet comes from the sun. The sun has provided a net energy surplus for a few million years, most of it stored in reduced hydrocarbons (about half in oil and half in methane hydrates, and a comparatively inconsequential amount in leftover fissile heavy atoms). The world's total carbon reserves (1.6E13 bbls oil equivalent) contain enough energy to provide current consumption (globally 1.2E14 Kwh/year) rates for 221 years. If the rest of the world catches up with US consumption rates all the reduced carbon in the world will only last 38 years.

      So, sooner or later (within 200 years, longer if there's a big global war or other population reducing event, much shorter if growth continues) all our energy will come from solar power directly as we will have consumed the planets "life savings" of net reduced carbon.

      Photosynthesis is 0.2% efficient. Photovoltaics are currently about 10% efficient (20X more) in commercial applications (7.5% efficient over the life of the device) and efficiencies of over 30% are achievable.

      To meet next year's global energy demands (1.2E14 Kwh, not including firewood) would take only 6.5E7 M2 of commercially available solar panels for $1.3E10 at current retail. The world will spend $4.4E11 on oil alone next year. If we spent 5% extra on oil (global tax) we could fully fund global solar power within a year. Interestingly, to meet the US's entire current energy demands with solar electric, we would need to cover about half of our roads, at no net change in albumen.

      Within 200 years, and probably within 50, all the energy used in the production of aluminum will be direct solar.

      Bamboo vs. Aluminum just isn't that obvious

      Bamboo is a very impressive material, basically a single orientation composite, which can be easily reinforced against torsion and it's comparatively low modulus can be compensated for with larger diameter tubes in a bicycle, but it is not obvious that it's a more efficient use of land to grow bamboo than to use solar power to recycle aluminum into new bicycles.

      But we have a long way to go on energy use and recycling, and so bamboo is an o

    22. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      These planes had more "horse power" in the glue than in the engine.

    23. Re:strength of bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...Well, from the picture, they are not using bamboo-to-bamboo interfaces at the high-stress areas (head tube-top/down tubes or bottom bracket shell), but are using metal lugs, much like many of the newer carbon-fiber racing bikes are again, so one does not have to make difficult carbon fiber-based lugs (like Trek's carbon bikes have). The results are not quite as pretty as a Trek, but if it's lighter and works, this usually trumps everything for most bike riders...

      So the metal lugs take care of the complicated stresses at these points and only transmit compression/tension stresses to the bamboo tubes, and minimize torsion stresses along a given tube (probably by using "oversize" bamboo tubes also).

      Another advantage to this is, if you crack a top tube in a crash, I would think it is relatively cheap to get a new tube put back in, instead of having to throw away the entire bike (i.e., Trek 5000-series) frame.

      I know I would probably NOT trust a bamboo handlebar (besides, how would they ever grow a bamboo drop handlebar?), but other than that...

      Yes, I realize that this article is about bikes for third-world countries, but if some sort of mandate from UCI came about to use more sustainable materials (if they can do it with bike frame shapes, they could do it with construction techniques and materials as well...) in exchange from deviation from standard "double-diamond" designs, then this affects a rabid, money-spending group of bike consumers...

      While I appreciate some of the tech in the bikes that pro bike racers use, I know that for 99% of bike racers, it does not make the difference between winning or losing a bike race, finishing that century, or grabbing a latte across town.
      It is a bit like buying a ferarri to buy groceries and run errands.

      Those who have the $$$ (or think or want to project that they do) will always spend it. The rest of us who don't have to look for value.

      It would be cool to buy a Colnago C-40 "ferarri" bike. But it's definitely not worth $7,000. Besides, the people who win bike races simply have better motors than those who don't. Their equipment doesn't matter much, if at all, compared to their peers. If everyone only had Schwinn Varsity's, the people who win bike races now would still be winning the races...

    24. Re:strength of bamboo by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is in a landfill is a small amount of consumer waste. The consumer can recycle their metal products and get money for it. I know...

      Why do I know about this metal recycling? Because my father used to own a metal stamping company. And it made sense to recycle because you would be given money. Most people do not know that you get MONEY back...

      So sorry, take a look at industry and how it recycles...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    25. Re:strength of bamboo by tau-lepton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Excellent Points. One problem that needs to be pointed out is that the type of efficiency given for photosynthesis are not the same type of efficiency numbers given for solar panels. One would assume that both of these are the quantum efficiencies of the systems when in fact the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis is between 6 and 9%. The lower 0.2 percent figure may take into account the following issues (taken from lecture by Dr. Tad W. Patzek) 1. C3 crops are at maximum photosynthesis rate at 1/5 of full sunlight, so 4/5 must be dissipated as heat (experiments in laboratories are performed at low light intensity) 2. Crops do not cover the entire field area. 3. Upper leafs form an unbroken canopy, which blocks sunlight from lower ones. 4. In areas far from the equator, the ambient temperature is too low for appreciable photosynthesis. E11, Prof. Tad W. Patzek 3 5. At temperatures higher than 30 degrees C, photorespiration losses are high. 6. Water shortage and deficiencies in trace elements limit plant growth. 7. CO2 at 360 ppm is frequently a limiting factor. C3 plants can double or triple photosynthesis rate in augmented CO2 . After these factors are taken into account the yield efficiency is approximately 0.5 percent. The post specifies 0.2 percent. I have not seen a number this low in the literature. Also 20 * 0.2% is 4% not 10%. Did the post intend to use 0.5% for efficiency of photosynthesis? ( 20 * 0.5% = 10%). "authors undermine their case by making inaccurate claims" Some of these factors also apply to solar panels. Which reduces the efficiency to an extent.

    26. Re:strength of bamboo by nick_urbanik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in Hong Kong, where builders scale massively high buildings, climbing only on bamboo scaffolding, I think there is scope for putting more trust in bamboo than you have!

  2. it's been done... by hangingonwords · · Score: 5, Funny

    i've seen this before on a show called gilligans island...

    --
    fact: microsoft > linux
    1. Re:it's been done... by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it hasn't, that was a bamboo car.

      --
      Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
    2. Re:it's been done... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 5, Funny

      i've seen this before on a show called gilligans island...

      Go figure, the Professor could make Bamboo Bikes, Timeshares, Coconut powered-radios, a nuclear reactor and yet they couldn't simply patch a fucking hole in the goddamn boat, The Minnow...wtf?!

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    3. Re:it's been done... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah its an old joke, but if memory serves he did fix it but Gilligan managed to sink it or lose it at sea. If they really wanted to get off the island they should have just shot Gilligan with a bamboo gun.

      "Whatcha building there Professor?"

      "Err, something that'll get us off the island and you're going to be the first to leave."

      "Gee, that sounds great Professor! When am I leaving?"

      "Now."

      *bang*

    4. Re:it's been done... by Seahawk91 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.innersports.org/indiabiketrip.htm

      This guy did it in India about two years ago.

  3. Ummmm..... by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does any one see a set of brakes on this thing?

    Yes, I know that some bikes have the brake mechanism in the hub of the rear wheel, but that doesn't appear in the photo either.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Ummmm..... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since it's only got one gear, would it be possible to control speed with the chain?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Ummmm..... by bj8rn · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Grandparent: I think it does have breaks inside the hub of the rear wheel, look more carefully - there is this metal clamp thingie just near the hub on the chain side of the bike.

      Parent: yeah, right. Imagine this - you're going at full speed. Downhill. You'd better keep your feet as far away from the pedals as possible - if you don't want to break your legs.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    3. Re:Ummmm..... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      many die hard mountain bikers use single speeds, especially for training. These are DIRECTLY tied to the wheel, no coasting action what so ever. (although they DO have normal handbrakes brakes, running without is just plain stupid, you use those for quick emergency stops only)

    4. Re:Ummmm..... by YeOldeGnurd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Parent: yeah, right. Imagine this - you're going at full speed. Downhill. You'd better keep your feet as far away from the pedals as possible - if you don't want to break your legs.


      This bike might have a internal coaster brake, like kids' bikes, or may very well be a fixed gear bike. These things do exist and are perfectly suitable to most urban environments (with the possible exeption of cities like San Francisco). Going downhill you DON'T take your feet off the pedals, you just control your descent by spinning at the right speed. It's actually a better system than relying on brake pads once you get competent using a fixie.
      --
      ...Nothing interesting here. Just move along...
    5. Re:Ummmm..... by bolind · · Score: 2, Informative

      These are DIRECTLY tied to the wheel, no coasting action what so ever.

      Nope. It is true that many die hard MTB'ers ride Single Speeds, but there's always a freewheel/coasting capability. Imagine trying to clear a tehnical rock section without being able to keep your pedal arms horizontal.

  4. Bear alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This would work fine, except that pandas eat bamboo. Better not get into a forest with that bike.

  5. Seems like a hoax... by fmita · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're probably just trying to bamboozle us...

  6. More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is the poster serious ?


    Aluminum makes up 8 percent of the crust of this damn planet. http://www.csulb.edu/~rodrigue/geog140/lectures/cr ustmaterials.html

    1. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by RiffRafff · · Score: 5, Informative

      He's prolly referring to raw aluminum. Extracting it consumes way too much electricity. Of course, recycling aluminum takes very little.

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    2. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but it's never found in its pure form. It takes a lot of energy to get workable aluminum out of the ore. You've got to heat it to 2300K, which takes a lot of energy. One report said that production of 1 kg of aluminum dumps 44 kg of CO2 into the air.

      In this case it's not so much the energy costs or the pollution as the fact that poor countries just don't have the energy to go around.

    3. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, but it's never found in its pure form. It takes a lot of energy to get workable aluminum out of the ore. You've got to heat it to 2300K, which takes a lot of energy. One report said that production of 1 kg of aluminum dumps 44 kg of CO2 into the air.

      It's not the electricity or energy so much- aluminum is extracted via electrolysis- but the enormous amount of electricity for this is often taken from hydroelectric plants which doesn't generate much CO2 (except during construction of the dam).

      However, the electrolysis uses carbon electrodes and they are used up by the process, they react with oxygen ions to produce CO2- and that's where a lot of the CO2 comes from.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by VPN3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think it's that big of a deal when it comes to bikes. The only bikes made from aluminum are the mid to high end bikes in the $500-$1500 range. The amount of aluminum used in these bikes is less than 6 pounds, typically. Most of the bike's weight is due to the gearing system, tires, strut system, crank and chain. These guys seem to be focusing on the low-end, buy your bike at Kmart crowd.

      If you look closely at the design of an aluminum bike, you can tell not many resources are used as they use the least for weight purposes. I know the frame on my Cannondale is a couple of millimeters thick. The rigidness comes from thin walls on a fat tube.

      Aluminum bikes aren't going to be around for much longer anyway, the price range for a good aluminum bike gets you right up there with titanium and magnesium alloy frames, which are superior in my opinion. Most of the trim parts consist of carbon fiber (wheels and forks on the better bikes use this).

      I am not sure what the point in this article is. There are far greater wastes of resources in new car design as well as the actual bottling process of cans. If the media, or anyone else cared enough to be earth friendly, we'd do it in ways that were actually beneficial. Not by purchasing organic bikes.

      A note on steel bikes. They aren't taking into consideration the actual alloys used when doing the comparison. No bikes are made with 100% steel. They use various alloies in the process.

      I'm picky on this subject after commuting soley by bike for a few years. I would not trust my riding on busy city streets to an organic material, I'd much prefer the comfort of knowing the materials are consistent due to the manufacture process involved with metals. I highly doubt the bamboo is nearly as consistent if measured across the bike's whole frame.

    5. Re:More Sustainable than Aluminum ?? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Much better to work on making bamboo beer cans than bicycles, consdidering the amount of Al consumed by the average Joe in every sixpack. Or go back to refillable glass bottles.

      On a tangent, in Thailand you can buy snacks of steamed rice with various goodies, cooked inside a section of bamboo. Buy them outside Hualampung Station before going on long train trips.

  7. Aluminuminuminuminum by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    expecially in contrast to aluminum, one of the most resource demanding materials that exist.

    That's funny. Aluminum is indeed expensive to extract and process and that's why it's also the most recycled mineral(?) in existence.

  8. Attacked By Endangered Species by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is all good until someone gets attacked by a Panda. Yet another version of "meals on wheels!"

    1. Re:Attacked By Endangered Species by RiffRafff · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate it when that happens.


      (Now, some extra crap to fill space and defeat lame lameness filter) blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
  9. Next Week... by Davak · · Score: 4, Funny


    Next week we can all read about the follow up stories from the America Plastic Association, the American Balsa Wood Collective, and the Society for the Reuse of Aluminum Foil...

    Davak

  10. "Sustainable"? by justinburt · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Bicycling more "sustainable"? Haven't the environmentalists been trying to get us all to change to bicycles from cars supposedly because of the pollution that cars generate? And now not even bicycles are "sustainable" because they are "resource intensive"?

    When does it end? Should I just stop using resources altogether (i.e. die?)

    I won't post this anonymously precisely because I mean this quite seriously and not as a troll. Mod me down if you must.

    Justin

    1. Re:"Sustainable"? by babymac · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Should I just stop using resources altogether (i.e. die?)

      Actually I've been convinced for years that this is exactly what radical environmentalists would like. They'd like to see 90% of the earth's population dead and the remaining 10% should behave and think exactly as they do. This means living a completely agrarian lifestyle and automatically believing that all advancing technology is bad and/or evil. How these ninnies ever expect to live beyond the death of our own sun is beyond me. But then again, they probably think that the death of all humanity is ultimately a good thing.

      --
      "War makes me sad." - Me
    2. Re:"Sustainable"? by Suidae · · Score: 2

      Here ya go

    3. Re:"Sustainable"? by cosyne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is "more sustainable" hard to comprehend? What makes you think that just because bicycling is better than driving automatically makes it perfect?

      What you seem to miss is that environmentalists' goals aren't just some arbitrary crap that someone made up to punish you. The idea is to do the least damage to the environment. If you can do less damage by biking, great. If you can do even less than that by using fewer resources in the process, wonderful. Even if "the environmentalists" you refer to are overestimating the problems caused by burning fossil fuels, do you honestly think that driving an Excursion around is helping anything but Ford and Exxon's bottom lines?

    4. Re:"Sustainable"? by gobbo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes, "radical" -- in the same way that Charles Manson was a radical aesthete. But you're in reality referring to a very few fringe freaks, who get great media coverage because the news is a circus.

      they probably think that the death of all humanity is ultimately a good thing...the word you're searching for is 'misanthropic' and yes some of the kookoo activists are deeply misanthropic, eg. Paul Watson. Misanthropes are as bad as Social Darwinists.

      No being can stop using resources. It's simply a question of ecology. How much do you give back to the life-sustaining biosphere, it's vigor and diversity? Only robo-heads assume that technology must by definition consume increasingly vast amounts of resources. It's our sloppiness, technological youth, and immature economics (eg. GDP benefits from ecological disaster) that keeps us overusing and laying waste. (Sidestepping population debates here.)

      Most environmentalists are all about appropriate technology, and want nothing more than society to act upon some of the basic principles of progress, such as "waste is a costly inefficiency" and "knowledge must complexify". That way we'll begin to understand chaotic systems like ecologies and develop cheaper, higher tech stuff that pollutes WAY less or not at all.

      I think a bamboo bike in mass production would have to be pretty high-tech to succeed. And, like many environmentalists, I look forward to cleverly designed industry, cities, and social conditions--appropriate (sustainable) technology. It's conservative, applies the precautionary principle, but it's not technophobic, its really an argument about what technology and how to deploy it.

  11. An explaination for non-bike-geeks by salimfadhley · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am a bike-geek as well as a Lunix-Geek:

    The bike is a single-speed. That means it does not need gears, breaks or even a ratcheted freewheel (on the back wheel)... the pedals are connected directly to the rear wheel by the chain. If you want to slow down you use your legs.

    Single-speeds are favourites of city-couriers, where there is a great advantage to have a light-simple bike. There is less to break (XTR gear systems are known to wear out after a few weeks of couriering).

    As for Aluminum - dont get me started on that nasty harsh material. There has been a disturbing trend for wannabee bikers to adopt the freakiest lightest materials at the expense of all other properties.

    For me, steel still has the edge over all these fancy materials. A steel frame will last for years of hard riding, and still feel as plush as the day it was first ridden.

    1. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by jchristopher · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you mean it's a "fixed gear" not a singlespeed. There are certainly plenty of singlespeed bikes (bikes with one gear) that aren't fixed. In fact, the majority of them are not fixed gears (i.e., you can coast).

    2. Re:An explaination for non-bike-geeks by paanta · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe you're talking about "fixed gear" bikes rather than single-speed bikes. Single-speed means one speed, with or without a freewheel. Fixed gear is a fixed, non-freewheeled single-speed bike. As far as aluminum goes, its no harsher than any other frame material. The amount of flex offered by the frame, compared to the seat and tires is so small that, for a given frame geometry, I doubt many people could tell the difference between steel and aluminum. Steel's big advantage is that you can get it repaired in third world nations, and lugged steel frames look freekin' cool. Even the biggest retro-grouch of them all, Sheldon Brown, doesn't think steel offers significant comfort advantages: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-materials.html

  12. Mountain biking by failedlogic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do a lot of mountain biking. I know there's some engineers who read /.

    There are suspension forks which can be purchased for mountain bikes and some offer read suspension.

    Assuming, the metal suspension fork is kept and a decent diameter bamboo tubing is used - would the bamboo have sufficient strength, durability and shock absorbing qualities to make a good mountain bike?

    One way or another it would be interesting to try, that's for sure.

    1. Re:Mountain biking by salimfadhley · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you could make a decent mountain bike, however the problem will come at the joins. Accordign to that photo, the frame is made of lugs that have been glued to bamboo poles. Carbon fibre frames are made in a similar way. The challenge is to find an adhesive that is able to bond nicely to metal and bamboo. The other problem with bamboo is that you cannot guarantee it's regularity in the same way that you can with an artificial tube... I guess that is where craftsmen come in. Not all bamboo tubes are created equal. A lugged frame is normally made by braising metal lugs to metal poles with a bit of solder. Lugged frames are known for being tough but really heavy.

    2. Re:Mountain biking by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not an engineer, but the kind of force applied when you push down on one pedal and pull on the corresponding handlebar seems like you'd be attempting to twist and bend the bamboo poles. The bamboo is only stronger than steel when you're pushing on each end.

      You'd eventually wear out your bike like that. Much faster than any commonly used bike material, I'm sure.

      I'd be concerned about the glue being too brittle to deal with serious vibrations, too, but they might be able to come up with the right kind, I'm sure.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  13. It must be fast....... by omar.sahal · · Score: 2, Funny

    so I can escape any rogue pandas.

  14. Wow, I want one! by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if this would me more or less expensive than a traditional bicycle? I usually try not to pay more than $200 (CDN) for a bike, because they always get stolen (even if they're locked up... those bastards).

    Since bamboo is so plentiful, I hope this would be uber-cheap. It would be great if I could ride around on a $15 bicycle... I wouldn't really care if it got stolen, but then again, nobody would really want to steal it if they knew how cheap it was... :)

    1. Re:Wow, I want one! by hobbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since you mention CDN, I assume you are in Canada, like myself. My question when I see this is will it stand up to the weather? He's using laminated bamboo. I have an old cromag/alu bike (over 10 years old now). Aside from the occasional greasing of the chain and other moving parts, the bike requires no thought to maintain, and it's had a lot of mud caked on it.

      Will I have to care for a laminated bamboo bike by oiling it or reweatherproofing it in some way? Will I have to carefully clean and dry it after riding on rainy days?

  15. Bamboo is cool by aaron.rowe · · Score: 5, Informative
    I spent some time working in Nigeria and watched the local people erecting 4+ storey buildings using bamboo as scaffolding and for supporting newly laid concrete floors.

    My Structural engineer friend told me that Bamboo is better than steel if used properly and since it just grows like grass it's basically free.

    A bamboo bycicle would be neat but, as a natural product you aren't going to get uniform material to work with so every bike would probably be completeley different to an other. You wouldn't be able to mass produce these things.

    Doing a little googling I found this report about using bamboo instead of steel in reinforced concrete.

    any way that's my bit out of the way.

    A

  16. I Bet Steel is Still the Better Choice by Schlemphfer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the summary:

    This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable, expecially in contrast to aluminum, one of the most resource demanding materials that exist.

    It's a cool looking bike, but there's a few things worth mentioning. First of all, compared to driving cars, any form of bicycle is the most sustainable mechanized transport imaginable. I think if we have to worry about the fifteen pounds of metal used for each bicycle, then we might as well give up all hope that humans can survive on the planet. Because if things are that bad, the millions of people buying SUV's are going to put us over the edge in no time, no matter what material we fashion bicycles out of.

    Secondly, the summary says that aluminum is "one of the most resource demanding materials that exist."

    That statement strikes me as terribly disingenuous, if it's not also mentioned that recycled aluminum does away with about 95% of the energies needed to extract aluminum from ore. And besides, how many bicycles are actually made from aluminum or fancy alloys/composites? No bicycle I've ever ridden, I know that much. And certainly not the bikes that are going to be produced for developing countries.

    The real question here is how much extra work goes into fabricating a bamboo bike, vs. mass producing a steel-framed bike that's totally useful to anyone who's not a racing enthusiast. Because I would bet that making bamboo bikes in quantity would take fivefold or even tenfold the labor of stamping out cheap steel-framed bikes. And if that's the case, bamboo bikes could never be within reach of the poor.

    Given how eco-friendly a steel-framed bike is, it's probably counterproductive to devote attention to an alternative that would probably be fundamentally unsuited to mass production.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
  17. Fixie! by YeOldeGnurd · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's called a "fixed gear bike". There's no freewheel in the rear hub, so you have to pedal all the time you are moving, and you stop by stopping pedalling.

    This may seem like a pain, but fixies are actually extremely popular among a certain bike subculture, particularly urban bike messengers. The famous and wonderful Sheldon Brown has an extensive collection of articles on building and riding fixies.

    --
    ...Nothing interesting here. Just move along...
  18. Re:Sustainable? by thebigmacd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing is, unlike trees bamboo reaches usable size in three years, and no need to replant after harvesting. Rather than deforest you can simply plant your own. And if they deforest correctly there is a new forest within three years. In the process of producing carbon fibre don't doubt there is a crazy amount of pollution and environmental destruction. Just think of the chemicals in the resin, and the use of sulphuric acid and petrochemicals in the fibre production process. All in all, the point is that I couldn't grow carbon fibre in my back yard no matter where I lived on this earth. Did it ever occur to you that in underprivilidged societies a bamboo bike may be a whole lot cheaper than carbon fibre?

  19. environment? quantity? economy? by evilWurst · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I question whether this is an environmental good thing. Using bamboo in stuff means *importing* bamboo - because if you try growing it anywhere other than where it's supposed to be, you can destroy your own local ecology. So it has to be imported, and you're economically tied to the few countries that can grow it in quantity and to the right quality. Steel and aluminum, on the other hand, are easy to get locally, and can be shaped in ways bamboo cannot. Plastics and carbon fiber can also be made locally, and carbon nanostuff will eventually also be available locally. And all of these other materials can be recycled, whereas bamboo can only be burned or mulched.

    You also can't mass produce bamboo products - as it says towards the bottom of the article, the guy that makes these needs to hand-select everything for quality. Remember, you can cut the length of these, but not the diameter - you're stuck with whatever diameter it grew to - so precision is extremely difficult.

  20. Bamboo bikes have existed for over 100 years by kfg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Particularly in the orient, but in other places as well when times were either hard or when metals were subject to civilian restriction, such as during WWII. Wooden bikes have also been used at times.

    They don't work very well. Bamboo is strong, but it's also very flexible. This is also the reason that molded plastic bikes ( as opposed to fiber reineforced plastic bikes) have never worked. If a plastic is ridid enough to make a good bike frame it's also to brittle.

    Aluminum is energy intensive to originally produce, but the cheapest and easiest metal to recycle. It also doesn't rust away to unusable oxide, making aluminum the most green of the metals in the long run.

    In any case you'll still find most bikes made of steel, because iron is common, easy to smelt, easy to turn into high quality steel, easy to recycle, cheap, and, while not necessarily the highest performing material for a bike frame in any particular measurment, it is, nonetheless, in the top 90 percentile in every attribute needed to make a good bike frame.

    What's more, you need very little steel to make a bike whose usable lifespan may be measured in decades. I have two ridable children's trikes over 100 years old.

    There's simply nothing about bamboo bikes that make them more sustainable than a steel bike, and they're nowhere near as good.

    KFG

  21. extraordinarily plentiful by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 2, Funny
    bamboo is much more environmentally friendly than metals while being extraordinarily plentiful

    This sounds great to me, but man I hope that bamboo doesn't work its way into my garden. Has anybody here ever tried to weed bamboo out of a garden?

    My mom planted bamboo once, and then, a few years later in the course of reorganizing her garden, asked me to dig it out. Ugh! That stuff is worse than an Outlook virus! It sends out needle sharpd shooters in all directions. If you see a single stalk poking out of the ground, it might have sent out shooters ten feet all around it. The only way I was able to finally dig it all out was to wait until after a heavy rain and basically just turn the "garden" into a mud soup pulling it out.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  22. Turns heads in Christiania by 123123123 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It turns heads in Christiania because it is the only bike that doubles as a hash pipe.

  23. Make it out of... by mcd7756 · · Score: 5, Funny
    sugar cane!!

    Sweet!

    --
    Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? --Abraham Lincoln
  24. Gilligan's Island by heli0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They had a bamboo bicycle that powered the washing machine.

    Did anyone see the episode where the professor made a bamboo car? Why he didn't just make a bamboo boat is beyond me.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  25. Pandas aren't bears. by Kludge · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're believed to be related to racoons. Take a look at the lesser panda.

  26. Fixed Gear Bikes by Eightlines · · Score: 3, Informative

    Technically speaking it does look like a single speed, but also a fixed gear. A fixed gear bike has less moving parts and therefore less chance of breaking down. The downside is that you will want to choose a gear that deals best with the terrain you are in.

    My fixed gear bike is running a ratio of 46t/16t chainrings (over a 2:1 ratio). The one in the photo looks more like a 24t/18t (close to a 1:1 ratio). Bottom line is you won't be picking up too much speed on this thing, but it should make the hills easy to climb and momentum easy to stop.

    Are the brakes necessary? For this bike, no. You can quickly bring this thing to a halt and in a worse case scenario put your feet down for a Flintstones stop.

  27. Re:It wil make you fat by dev_sda · · Score: 2, Funny

    yeah, smoking hemp twine will get you high, just like masturbating will make you go blind.

  28. Slivers & Rattan by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Bamboo is prone to splitting and fracturing when under lateral strain. I would really hate to have one of those collapse under me due to lateral stress fractures. All those sharp slivers of bamboo right under my crotch?

    One of the primary reasons (even beyond weight and durability) why the SCA uses rattan instead of bamboo for weapon shafts in its mock "heavy" combat is that it does not splinter but instead kind of "pulps" when it breaks. The concern on the battle field is that splinters could easily be driven through helm eyeslots. There's enough risk in taking a blow or falling in armor during normal fighting that extreme hazzards like that are hardly welcome.

    After all, we can't have anyone getting hurt during a war, can we?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  29. flaming hoops by yintercept · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bamboo is also flamable...which leaves out common activities like jumping through flaming hoops, or over a burning tar pit. Being made of wood, I really wouldn't want to ride a bamboo bike while juggling chainsaws. There are lots of arguments against bamboo bikes.

    Personally, I would love to see more natural fibers in bikes. Rather than making the whole bike from bamboo, making just a few pieces helps reduce the consumption from the titanium mines.
    Sig: Flamable materials are dangerous, which is why I always make sure the products I buy are clearly marked as "inflamable."

  30. Every teenager's dream by Mr_Icon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kids, to those of you who just don't have enough reasons to be picked on and beaten up in middle school, we give you... THIS BAMBOO BICYCLE!

    Complete with a detachable frame for easier caning.

    --
    If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
  31. Re:That's even more sustainable. by timeOday · · Score: 2, Funny
    Dear Poster,

    Please use emticons in your future postings so we know whether to laugh with you or at you.

    Thanks,
    The Slashdot-reading public.

  32. Can't win for losing... by switcha · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is a strong step towards making bicycling more sustainable,

    Fine, get excited about the technology involved here, but spare me the statements like that. Everytime I ride to work, I keep a car or about 1/30th of a bus off the road. (I realize I'm not actually 'keeping the bus off the road', but work with me here.) I don't even need to go on about what a retarded statement that is, to call bicycles anything but a vehicle of sustainability.

    What's next? Smack-talking a water powered car because it's a drought season?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  33. Hmm by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wonderful. Right up until you pull a wheelie, and the frame shatters and spits you from anus to esophagus. Yegads, but that's a big splinter you've got there, son!

  34. Impress me... by Wandering+Goliard · · Score: 2, Funny

    *knits, waits patiently for bamboo Intel chips*

  35. Webpage of company (not yet featuring the bike) by gnalle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is the homepage of the company. They haven't added the bamboo bike yet, but, I have mailed them and urged them to add it http://www.christianiabikes.com/english/uk_main.ht m

  36. I can't wait to get one by binarybum · · Score: 2, Funny


    I'm going to keep it in my garage with my Segway(tm) and my electric car.

    I'll order one as soon as I finish this bag O-lean chips!

    --
    ôó
  37. The Hemp Bicycle by kardar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if there is a way to use hemp in the manufacture of bicycles as well? Ford was experimenting building cars out of it, and using the oil from the seeds as raw material fuel to run those cars, but nothing ever came of that, unfortunately.

    They make houses out of hemp. There is a hemp pulp that gets mixed with the right minerals and you can build walls. So far, however, the shipping from France, which is where you can get what is sometimes called "hemp concrete" or "hemp cement", has been more expensive than the product itself, which is rather inexpensive, and a relatively inexpensive way to build a house, or a shed, or a barn, etc....

    Some hemp pulp and the right minerals to make a cement - molded into tubes or other shapes - maybe with a little bamboo helping out here and there... I bet you could make a fairly nice bicycle out of hemp products.

  38. Done before by kitzilla · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have seen bamboo and other wooden bikes done before.

    As some folks have pointed out, the problem with wooden bikes is that they flex. Badly.

    That means your chainline won't stay straight. It will rub, and the gears will try to shift by themselves. Note that the bamboo bike in the picture doesn't have derailleurs. There's a reason.

    To reduce flex, you have to increase the diameter of the bamboo tubing. At some point, it becomes impractical-- rather like riding a tree trunk down the street.

    The designer of this bamboo ride seems to have tried to compensate for the flexy tubing by adding a brace across the main diamond of the frame. It really won't help much if the rider is strong or heavy. The bottom bracket is gonna feel like it's made of rubber.

    There's also the matter of frame alignment. I don't care what you coat bamboo with--it's going to change shape with temperature and humidity. Even casual riders on low-end bambo bikes will be frustrated by a ride that doesn't track in a straight line.

    My dad used to race track bikes with wooden rims. They were notoriously dangerous. Riding a bicycle is risky enough without having to worry about being impaled by its wreckage.

    If you're really concerned about the resources consumed by aluminim or titanium framesets, there's always steel. Modern steel bike tubing approaches the low weight of aluminum and provides more forgiving ride characteristics. There are also cabon fiber and composite alternatives.

    The bamboo bike is a head-turner. But bamboo sucks as a bicycle frame material.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  39. Re:This Rocks! by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful
    None of these are the real point at hand. I think the real potential is in third world countries, where many people don't own any sort of bicycle

    No, because a bamboo bike would be more expensive and less durable than a steel one.

    The ability to have a cheap bicycle, made from sustainable materials is an incredible thing for these people

    Except that it's impossible. Can they make a bamboo hub or chain? What about the lugs? Wheels? Gear wheel? Ball bearings?

    I'm sure in Laos you can buy cheap Chinese-made bikes. (Flying Pigeon, eg). They ARE ALREADY "sustainable". All they need are new tires every ear or so, and put some oil on the chain when it rains, regrease the bearings once a year or two, repaint every 10 years. You find little roadside shops where guys fix bikes (patch flats, fix most other problems with a hammer and a wrench) for pennies in the third world. (I've biked in Indonesia, Thailand and China.) With minimum maintenance they last for decades. Bamboo bikes are a novelty item for rich Westerners, completely useless to the third world.

  40. Recycling problems by TWX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Say I live in a fairly high-density city, in an apartment or condominium. I have a stove that is broken and old and not worth servicing to make functional again. It's dirty as hell, and just plain gross. Let's also so say that I don't own a truck. How am I supposed to recycle it? No one is going to come pick it up and still give me money for it, and even if someone is willing to pick it up for free to me, I still have to schedule and wait. However, there is the big trash can in the complex that is emptied three times a week, and I can get a couple of friends to help me heave it into the trashcan, and it'll be hauled off with all of the other garbage. Or, I can leave it sitting next to the trash can for it to be someone elses' problem.

    A large amount of consumer waste isn't metal, it's plastic, ceramic, glass, or silicon. Metal things generally last longer. The big things that are metal are the problems. Recycling needs to be made more practical for them to be handled right.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.