Slashdot Mirror


China Building Linux-Based 10 Teraflop Supercomputer

securitas writes "CNet Asia reports that China is building a 2000-processor supercomputer based on the AMD Opteron 64-bit CPU. The new supercomputer will run a Chinese-designed Linux operating system. Based on current standings, the resulting 10-teraflop machine will make it the third most powerful supercomputer in the world. The Red Grid project is being built by Dawning Information Industry and China's National Research Centre for Intelligent Computing Systems. The Red Grid/Dawning 4000A is expected to be complete by June 2004. But China has competition - weighing in at 40 teraflops, the Cray Red Storm AMD-based 10,000-Opteron supercomputer built for Sandia National Labs will become the supercomputer heavyweight next year. More at Infoworld , InternetNews and Yahoo."

260 comments

  1. Itanium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What, no Itaniums? :-P

    Now AMD, if you could only get your desktop solution out there for a nice price...

    1. Re:Itanium by Gherald · · Score: 1

      I don't think the 2500 Barton for $90 can be beat by anything Intel offers, especially with a little OC knowledge (I have two 2500 based systems overclocked to 2312mhz, which is faster than a 3000).

      But even w/o OC, you'd have to spend about $160 to get a comparable 2.4ghz from Intel.

      If you are spending more than $200, however, it is clearly a different story and Intel's 800fsb chips are the better deal.

    2. Re:Itanium by Gherald · · Score: 1

      I just realized after posting this that you were probably refering to the Athlon64... Duh.

      Well yes I do hope it has a nice price. I plan on waiting till about Q2 2004 to buy mine though, so I am not so worried about the initial premium being too high.

    3. Re:Itanium by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Desktop solution? What's the problem?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Itanium by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      PC fan boys can't stand it when Apple Computer has a cooler computer than is availtable to them.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  2. Air con by danormsby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The big story should be about the air conditioning system for this baby.

    --
    Omnis amans amens
    1. Re:Air con by dprice · · Score: 2, Informative

      The big story should be about the air conditioning system for this baby.

      The Earth Simulator in Japan requires is own power plant in an attached building to power the computer and the air conditioning system.

    2. Re:Air con by saden1 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I want to know when McBride is going to make a visit to China and is their any hope of them imprisoning his ass for trying to defraud the state?

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    3. Re:Air con by shaggie · · Score: 1

      lol... you know, sometimes I think autocratic societies have their usefulness... now someone go inform him that he needs to go to China!!

  3. Oooooh.... by imehler · · Score: 1

    Urge to run L0pht Crack... Rising....

    1. Re:Oooooh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a supercomputer for that. The hash has been broken. Takes about a second on a machine with 1GB RAM.

  4. AMD by delphin42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This should do a lot for AMD's credibility as a server processor manufacturer. According to the current top500 list, you have to go to number 84 to find an AMD based supercomputer. If these articles are correct, you'll soon have 2 in the top 5. That's quite a change of events.

    --
    -- Adam
  5. Hey! by rmohr02 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine a Beowulf...nevermind.

  6. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine.. a cluster of coolers for this baby!

  7. Have the opterons outsold the Intanics? by brejc8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The inq have a story wondering if just the two mentioned super computers worth of opterons sold have allready outsold the itanics.

    1. Re:Have the opterons outsold the Intanics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that "Itanic" is a joke name, not the real name, right?

    2. Re:Have the opterons outsold the Intanics? by neongenesis · · Score: 1
      You do realize that "Itanic" is a joke name, not the real name, right?

      Well, for a little while longer, maybe...

  8. Can they pull it off? by coolgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems it's a lot more complicated to build a network of 2000 boxes than it is to make a web page without broken img links (Link is from the c-net article)

    --

    cat /dev/null >sig
    1. Re:Can they pull it off? by parlyboy · · Score: 1
      Seems it's a lot more complicated to build a network of 2000 boxes than it is to make a web page without broken img links

      Most of us Slashdot readers have no idea what you're talking about. You see, the page renders beautifully in Internet Explorer...

    2. Re:Can they pull it off? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Why can't they put the money towards something useful, like staffing the abuse desks at Chinese ISPs with real people rather than poor copies of Dave Null. They should do this before everyone outside of China has them blocked at the border routers.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Can they pull it off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...in Mozilla, too.

    4. Re:Can they pull it off? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      This:
      http://www.dawningusa.com/image\arrow-right.gif
      is not a valid URL for the web as far as I know...

      Maybe there's something wrong with your browser?

    5. Re:Can they pull it off? by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      The guy above figured it out...they've put \ in their image URIs. Whether this supports or contradicts my suggestion of incompetence is an exercise for the reader. Page still doesn't render in Safari. I suspect this is a problem for Konqueror too.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
  9. Conspiracy revealed! by archen · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's what the Three Gorges Dam was for all along. To cool this thing.

    1. Re:Conspiracy revealed! by ehiris · · Score: 1

      The Three Gorges Dam better be many times larger then the Hoover Dam which currently only has the capacity to cool my overclocked AMD processor.

  10. New slogan for AMD and linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Helping to opress 1/3rd of the earth population"

    1. Re:New slogan for AMD and linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt. I like linux and I like AMD, but china can suck my ass.

    2. Re:New slogan for AMD and linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I like Linux and hate AMD AND China.

      I'm actually amazed that the US government is letting AMD do this since 10 teraflops exceeds allowable US export regulations.

      AMD AND China both suck ass.

    3. Re:New slogan for AMD and linux... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Unless I read it wrong, isn't it a Chinese company building it? AMD is only shipping the CPU's, which wouldn't constitute a 10 teraflop system.

      The feds could mess with AMD because they're helping a foreign power build one though. But the same could probably be said for other vendors too.. You know for storage they're going to have 2 Maxtor 80Gb hard drives bought from CompUSA.. :)

      I wonder if the CIA, FBI, and NSA are just letting them work the bugs out, and they'll have their own built. We'll never read about *THAT* contract though. They'd probably call it workstation parts to keep it under the radar of everyone, and then *poof*, Big Brother 3 is born.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  11. Umm correction to OP by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Informative

    -The new supercomputer will run a Chinese-designed Linux operating system.

    No. The new supercomputer will run a Linus-designed Linux operating system that has been heavily modified to suit the tastes of the Chinese. Counter to popular belief, the Chinese did not design Linux.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Umm correction to OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. The new supercomputer will run a Linus-designed Linux operating system that has been heavily modified to suit the tastes of the Chinese.

      You mean, it will hunt down all traces of free thought and dissent and ruthlessly stamp them out?

      Hmm... how do you say "Skynet" in Chinese?

    2. Re:Umm correction to OP by rde · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. The supercomputer will run a GNU-designed, Linux-kernel-based operating system. Counter to popular belief, Linus did not design more than the kernel of the OS.

      Normally, I'm not a gnu-head, but if others are going to be pedantic, why shouldn't I?

    3. Re:Umm correction to OP by praksys · · Score: 3, Funny

      No. The new supercomputer will run a Linus-designed Linux operating system...

      Damn straight. And remeber its "Linus/Linux" not just "Linux". Give credit where its due.

    4. Re:Umm correction to OP by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I remember an interview that Linus believed that his view of the operating system _is_ the kernel because the kernel answers to no program and all programs answer to it. He also admitted that Microsoft would have a broader definition, because it suits their marketing needs.

    5. Re:Umm correction to OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight. And remeber its "Linus/Linux" not just "Linux". Give credit where its due.

      That got me laughing for a good 20 seconds.

    6. Re:Umm correction to OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with those improvements, linux will also be appropriate for application by the US government. finally.

    7. Re:Umm correction to OP by zephc · · Score: 1

      "tian wang-mo" as best i can tell ("sky network"). "Sky Net" itself would just be "tian wang"

      thank YOU, zhongwen

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    8. Re:Umm correction to OP by mgs1000 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ...and Linus' view would suit his ego?

    9. Re:Umm correction to OP by didiken · · Score: 1
      -The new supercomputer will run a Chinese-designed Linux operating system.

      No. The new supercomputer will run a Linus-designed Linux operating system that has been heavily modified to suit the tastes of the Chinese. Counter to popular belief, the Chinese did not design Linux.


      Wrong wrong wrong !!! The The new supercomputer will run a Linus-designed GNU/Linux operating system that has been heavily modified to suit the tastes of the Chinese.
  12. 10 Trillion divided by 1.5 billion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap! That's about 6,666 flops per Chinese citizen!

    1. Re:10 Trillion divided by 1.5 billion. by nick-less · · Score: 2, Funny

      Holy crap! That's about 6,666 flops per Chinese citizen!

      fine, so they could save many pocket calculators... ;-)

    2. Re:10 Trillion divided by 1.5 billion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't considered the overhead in the latency involved with communication between the people using calculators...

  13. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...does it run Linux????

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      From the ZDnet article: "The 4000A will be a cluster comprised of computers running a Chinese-designed Linux operating system..."

      Next time please RTFA.

    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, it's Chinese!

  14. cold war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    battling out supercomputers with eleventy million terafloppies is like a modern day coldwar/space race. except with less fake pictures. and more flops.

    Mmmmm flops.

    1. Re:cold war by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1
      "Tear down that rack of iron!"
      It's like a new Cold Chip War. What are they doing with all these teraflops? Maybe they'll have enough processing power that they can simulate every troop, munition, and machinery.. and the computers will declare the winner.

      (oops, I forgot, 1983 movie, Matthew Broderick and Ally Sheedy)
    2. Re:cold war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will use the Teraflops to simulate Nuclear Munitions, advancing greatly their ability to build "smaller Nuclear Bombs". These bombs will allow them to develop and deploy missiles to attack the USA with MIRVed ICBMS / SLBMs. Welcome to the new arms race! At least we will get off our "Globalization kick", and stop "selling the rope" that will be used to hang us.

  15. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they'd used IPv6, would solve alot of problems!

  16. China Syndrome? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Funny

    If China Syndrome is when the core of a nuclear plant gets so hot that it starts to melt through the earth's core, theoretically towards China...

    What is it called when hundreds of AMD CPU's get equally hot and start to melt through the earth's core, theoretically towards the US?

    1. Re:China Syndrome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, a joke that would have been funny three years ago! Wow.

    2. Re:China Syndrome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. Syndrom. It never forgets the mistakes of the past.

    3. Re:China Syndrome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called justice.

  17. The Next Space Race? by Psx29 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe its just me...but it seems like there is increasing competition for the top supercomputer. Japan holds the top at the moment, and the US is home to the second most powerful...and now china is entering into the fray. Of course there undoubtely other countries besides the top 3 that are trying to earn a place as well. I wonder if India will be next?

    1. Re:The Next Space Race? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      If India will be next? Newsflash: India have been building super computers for a long time now, mostly to avoid the US export limitations imposed due to their little "mine is bigger than yours" game with Pakistan (involving nuclear tests).

    2. Re:The Next Space Race? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Japan holds the top at the moment, and the US is home to the second most powerful"

      Japan has the world's most powerful computer, and they're using it to model climate change and to do scientific research into how the earth works.

      America has the world's second most powerful computer. They use it to help build things to make big explosions.

    3. Re:The Next Space Race? by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 1

      what about the ones IBM has been working on for a year that will be 300 and 500 tereflops. faster than the top 300 supercomputers combined. I'd like to see them beat that with AMD's

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    4. Re:The Next Space Race? by Jotham · · Score: 1

      Yes, but just wait until Japan performs their secret TSUNAMI ATTAKU - all the computers are for the really cool power-up animation sequence before the butterfly flaps its wings.

  18. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you elaborate? How is it on topic?

  19. Good... by FosterSJC · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Maybe then can start simulating nuclear test blasts instead of actually conducting them.

    1. Re:Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is very hard to do. That's why the US is reopenning its nuclear blast test program.

  20. Hope AMD plans to... by OneOver137 · · Score: 1

    Embed some "extra" code to help them out...

  21. Chineese? by SharpFang · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The new supercomputer will run a Chinese-designed Linux operating system.

    I thought Torvalds comes from Finland?
    Or are some obscure RMS ancestors chineese? ;)

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  22. wait'll SCO finds out by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine what their licensing fee will be, what's the licensing fee for an equivalent machine running openserver? There must be some out there since all these enterprise capabilities came straight from the heart of SCO.

    1. Re:wait'll SCO finds out by Maj.+Kong · · Score: 5, Funny

      In one corner: Darl McBride, the SCO Group, and two dozen lawyers.

      In the other corner: the People's Liberation Army.

      Yeah, I'd pay to see that.

      Maj. Kong

      --

      Shoot, a fella' could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all that stuff.
    2. Re:wait'll SCO finds out by turgid · · Score: 1

      Since when did US laws apply in China?

  23. So how fast do supercomputers scale? by Bushcat · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the most interesting part of this is to learn whether vast numbers of simple computers (Seti et al) scale better or worse than vast numbers of clustered computers (Google et al).

  24. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it have humor?

  25. and then India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then South Africa. Followed by Sweden or Finland, Costa Rica, and Andorra. Before you know it, the Vatican City will have the 17th fastest supercomputer in the world, running an OS founded by an avowed atheist.

    Maybe irony is what makes us human. Is any other species on the planet this self-contradictory?

    1. Re:and then India by GammaTau · · Score: 1

      Maybe irony is what makes us human. Is any other species on the planet this self-contradictory?

      GNU

    2. Re:and then India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To call GNU self-contradictory is to miss the point of the FSF. Gates gets one thing right - the FSF as envisioned by Stallman is against "Intellectual Property" as he conceives it.

      You see, the FSF believes (and is backed up by physical reality), that one SHOULD have property rights (be able to exercise arbitrary control) over YOUR computing machine and YOUR copy of some information , but NOT over someone else's computing machine or copy of some information. This totally contradicts Gates' vision of Stalinist control over what other people can and cannot run on their computers.

      Yes, the GPL uses IP to "restrict" your freedom in certain ways- but only as long as you uphold IP law. If you have no problems with breaking IP law, you can ignore the GPL. So it's only developers who care about the artificial government monopolies created by IP law that say the GPL restricts freedom. It's a classic psychological double-bind, and it really pisses Gates off, since it perfectly illustrates that Gates' empire is really the embodiment of (the-american-conception-of) Communism Dictatorship.

    3. Re:and then India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only on slashdot can you have a 3 paragraph response to a one word troll- and see it moderated up :)

  26. Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...did you feel the breeze as the parent post's joke passed over your head?

    1. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! You sl4shd05 kids are t3h funny!!@#@!# I never could have thought of such a teh aweseome jokester, EVAR!!!!! Pleese sha-re more!

  27. Colorful by It's+the+tripnaut! · · Score: 1

    "Red Grid", "Red Storm" whatever happened to "Green Destiny"?

  28. Big jump from Gigaflop abacus by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Think how many beads we going to need for this...

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  29. Can I have one? by Epistax · · Score: 1

    I think I can get Cray to make one for me afterwards. I mean, after they make one, another can't cost that much.. right?

  30. Also interesting by Waab · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The University of Kentucky is still doing interesting things with Athlons & Linux. Just about two weeks ago, a group there built KASY0, which they expect to set a new price/performance record at better than 1GFLOPS/$100. More about KASY0 here.

    1. Re:Also interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since it's in Kentucky, the admins don't have to wear shoes.

    2. Re:Also interesting by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      You've got 3 freaks now, and I added you to my Foes list cos your sig was fucking lame.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    3. Re:Also interesting by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

      You're goddamn right your sig is lame!

      j/k =P

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  31. In other news.... by botzi · · Score: 1

    ....Today, the /. readers dismissed as ridiculous the topic of the Brussel's beast. One of the main point in the discussion was the statement by several of the regular posters that no one builds "super"computers anymore...back to you Dave.....

    --
    1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
  32. Link... overload! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ever notice how Slashdot stories often have far too many links? Since the front page doesn't get the little [slashot.org]-style URL warnings, I'm always afraid of being linked to a certain .cx site or a disturbing picture of a girl... spewing.... something... This article was pretty good, though. it didn't link to easy-to-find pages like Google, Yahoo, IBM, Microsoft, etc.

    Oh well, Slashdot, you are my friend!

  33. I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Krapangor · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I don't think that the US will be the world's most powerful nation in long term. China has much more resources and population and therefore the chance to overtake the US in the next 20 years. Let's list Chinas benefits over the US:
    1. Population: sheer mass counts. If US has 1 genius in 1 million people, than we have 400 geniuses in the US. But China would have 1.100 which is quite an advantage.
    2. Education system: The US has a better starting position, but China is rapidly gaining. Chinese have thrown away all Mao anti-illectual rubbish and know to value knowledge these days.
    3. Traditions: The confucian traditions imply total devotion to work and society. However, the US tradition imply total devotion to self interest and egoism. So, the Chinese society have much better chance to complete large scale and high effort projects. The US have problems there. Take e.g. Iraq we have our boys just a few months there, but already the press is whining that some of them are dying. Even worse the US economic system is based on these "values", so we can't change them without having our society collapse.
    4. Resources: China has many natural resources. Even more there are much resources in the neighboring countries. These are very weak, so China has just to blackmail or to conquer them to get the resources.
    5. Legal bonds: there is not much copyright and IP enforced in China. So free from all patent and IP bounds China's economics and science can develop much faster.
    6. Less restricted goverment: In China the goverment doesn't have to obey very much restrictions. So they don't have to spend so much money on their own people or to protect human rights.
    The conclusion of this is that the US has very bad cards in the upcoming powergame with China. Instead of concentration on their nationalist isolational politics, the US should come back to their very own sources. So the US should join the EU as an equal partner and adopt the more efficient European legal system. I think they should urge minor European based countries like Canada or Australia to join. The combined of power of US, Europe and the others (1.5 Billion people 84 percent of world's economics). Could face the Asian challenge and win.
    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well first of all, I am an American citizen.

      But why does anyone have to "win" as the most powerful nation? More importantly, why does it have to be the united states? Truthfully I'd be happy if the US finally slid into 2nd place. Part of the problem with the govenment today is that they're completely wrapped up in maintaining the power of the US. We've become something akin to a cop who maintains his rule with bullying. The govement should start worrying about the problems of its own people instead of playing these political chess games. Year after year I hear people asking, why are we over in that country doing that? ... for practically as long as I can remember. Most people in the US would be happy if the US goverment would just mind it's own buisness, and the more we fuck with the world, the more the rest of the world wishes the same.

    2. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by kotj.mf · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not really. Something like 13% of the land in China is actually arable, a much lower proportion than in the US. And arable land is the most important natural resource of all; you can't really become globe-dominating power without the ability to feed yourself. Hence the freakishly intensive nature of Chinese agrigculture. Most farmers still have to plant thousands upon thousands of rice seedlings by hand.

      Cite:

      The total land area in China ranks the third in the world and the per capita land area is 0.777 hectare, about one third of the world average figure. The per capita arable land is 0.106 hectare, being 43% of the world average figure. The quality of the arable land in our country is not good on the whole. There are almost six million hectares of steep slope land over 25 degrees in the whole country. The arable land with water sources and irrigation facilities only accounts for 40% and the medium and low yield arable land accounts for 79% of the arable land.
      --
      hang brain.
    3. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      So it's supposed to be an advantage to the U.S.A. to adopt the policies that are causing western Europe to become progressively weaker?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    4. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Population: sheer mass counts. If US has 1 genius in 1 million people, than we have 400 geniuses in the US. But China would have 1.100 which is quite an advantage.

      Population is more of a disadvantage than an advantage at this point. And "genius" isn't just a matter of statistics, it requires an environment that fosters it. Renaissance Venice didn't have a very high population.

      Education system: The US has a better starting position, but China is rapidly gaining. Chinese have thrown away all Mao anti-illectual rubbish and know to value knowledge these days.

      Unfortunately they've replaced the Maoist garbage with extremist nationalist garbage that is just as dangerous. And the extreme poverty that so much of China lives in drags down the education system. There are computer science departments in some area colleges that don't have, well, any computers.

      Traditions: The confucian traditions imply total devotion to work and society. However, the US tradition imply total devotion to self interest and egoism. So, the Chinese society have much better chance to complete large scale and high effort projects.

      Confucianism isn't as strong as it once was, which is a good thing; it's a very nasty, hierarchical, heavily class-based system. Its adherence to family and social obligations also encourages nepotism and cronyism, which is one of the central reasons why so many third-world economies hit the ropes so easily.

      Take e.g. Iraq we have our boys just a few months there, but already the press is whining that some of them are dying. Even worse the US economic system is based on these "values", so we can't change them without having our society collapse.

      Well it sounds like you have a definite ideological bias there, but the diversity of viewpoints is an advantage, not a disadvantage (though the right inevitably tries to smear dissent as "unpatriotic", at least when they're in power).

      Resources: China has many natural resources. Even more there are much resources in the neighboring countries.

      China has a fair amount of resources due to it's sheer size, but they're missing some things (such as enough arable land).

      These are very weak, so China has just to blackmail or to conquer them to get the resources.

      Well I definitely disagree with this. China is actually surrounded by smaller, yet militarily stronger countries. India is weaker than China in terms of pure military power, but they do have nuclear weapons and would probably react to any incursion with them. Japan has a smaller military, but far more advanced, and would probably beat China even without US help. Taiwan also has a very small, but very high-tech military, and China's obsolete transports and air force would be cut down pretty quickly if they tried anything. Russia, even now, is no pushover, and has a stronger military and a larger nuclear arsenal if it came to that. The southeast side of the country is slightly less intimidating, but I don't even think the Chinese government will go near the psychopaths who run North Korea.

      Legal bonds: there is not much copyright and IP enforced in China. So free from all patent and IP bounds China's economics and science can develop much faster.

      Yes, but I don't think they have the economy to drive the science, even if they have the information. And to get the foreign investment they really crave they'll have to start cracking down on IP issues.

      Less restricted goverment: In China the goverment doesn't have to obey very much restrictions. So they don't have to spend so much money on their own people or to protect human rights.

      True, which results in such things as the Three Gorges Dam. But a tyrannical government has no stability, as history has shown again and again.

    5. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the US should join the EU as an equal partner and adopt the more efficient European legal system The problem is the U.S. is not in Europe you dumb fuck. Mod me up, because you know I'm right.

    6. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZING

    7. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      China is actually surrounded by smaller, yet militarily stronger countries. India is weaker than China in terms of pure military power, but they do have nuclear weapons and would probably react to any incursion with them. Japan has a smaller military, but far more advanced, and would probably beat China even without US help. Taiwan also has a very small, but very high-tech military, and China's obsolete transports and air force would be cut down pretty quickly if they tried anything. Russia, even now, is no pushover, and has a stronger military and a larger nuclear arsenal if it came to that. The southeast side of the country is slightly less intimidating, but I don't even think the Chinese government will go near the psychopaths who run North Korea.

      You are wrong on the military front. China is stronger than any other country in Asia. China could easily beat India (the presence of WMD simply means that there won't be any "real" war). Taiwan is a joke, compared to China. Military people don't like to admit this but don't forget that there is something called "war of attrition". Basically you just keep sending your soldiers until they win by sheer numbers. China can easily do this. China can also defeat Japan IMO. China may not be as advanced as USA, UK, Russia, etc. But they are up there. They have all the latest Russian stuff (may not be as good as US but still not bad). Even though they may have weaker tech, they can still win by numbers and strategy. For isntance, China has far greater number of submarines and aircraft carriers than Japan.

      But a tyrannical government has no stability, as history has shown again and again.

      Not really true if you are practicising totalitarianism. The tyrannical governments that fail are non-totalitarian systems like dictatorships (one evil dude), monarchy, etc. But systems like Communism and fascism can survive for a long time. Soviet Union survived for quite a while and could have survived even longer if Gorbachev et al wanted to. Instead, they lost interest and that's why it collapsed. Soviet Union did NOT collapse due to a popular uprising (totalitarian regimes can crush these easily). Similarly, Nazi Germany could have survived for 50+ years if it won the war. It had massive support of its local population, and had managed to brainwash (or kill) any of its opponents. Perhaps the best example is colonialism. Colonial governments like Britain, Spain, etc managed to keep going for hundreads of years.

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    8. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that China will take over the #1 spot in the future (but not in 20 years--more like 50 years). However, the advantage is not as big as you think. Consider the points you mentioned:

      Population:

      A lot of people seem to forget the downside of large populations. Large populations have increased social problems (my theory is that population ahd social issues are correlated in a non-linear manner). Things like crime, unemployment, famine, disease, etc are much more problematic with a large population. For instance, the biggest challenge facing China over the next 20 years will be figuring out what to do with the massive number of layed off workers due to elimination of government companies. There are millions of Chinese that are unemployed and flocking to the cities. These people's lives need to be considered. Possible side-effects of this problem include high crime, loss/decrease of worker rights, horrible sanitary conditions in cities... all the way to potential collapse of Communism itself. If Communism collapses, all these predictions will be moot...

      Education system:

      China actually has very good educational system--all so-called Communist countries do. Don't forget that USA isn't that much better. There are large numbers of Americans who cannot write properly (bad grammer, spelling, etc). There are many Americans who can't even do high-school math. At the rate that USA is going, these things will just get worse. I claim that social problems are non-linear and what this means here is that people who fell through the educational system will likely not emphasize school to their kids, and so on.

      Traditions:

      I don't think tradition really plays a role. I mean just look at Japan, which is very tradionalist--not that liberal at all. Yet it did well for the last few decades. Besides, what you are saying is contradictory. Capitalism rewards and requires greed, violence (to enforce authority or steal resources from other countries), ignorance of family values, etc. If anything, China will be worse off due to its traditions...

      Resources:

      Resources are meaningless under capitalism. All that matters is money--wealth! You can buy whatever you don't have, and if that doesn't work out invade countries and steal their resources. This is how USA has been going on for the last 50 years. USA consumes more than they can. Believe it or not, USA imports more than it exports with practically every country. Resources haven't played a role for USA, and it won't for China either. Remember: you can buy anything! Including human labour...

      Legal bonds:

      Not sure what to say here... I don't know how much this matters. From a socialist point of view, being open shifts the benefit to the population as a whole; capitalists, of course, argue that this is detrimental to innovation (eg. a capitalist would say that you can't have software development businesses in China because piracy is rampant). I guess it boils down to which side of the spectrum you are on.

      Less restricted goverment:

      If the govt has to spend less on social issues and in upholding human rights, it is actually a very negative thing. There have been more revolutions, overthrow of govt, etc due to social issues and human rights issues than anything else. People don't overthrow governments to gain freedom; they overthrow governments because they are discriminated against or are starving. If China skimps on social infrastructure/etc it won't last very long IMO.

      Instead of concentration on their nationalist isolational politics, the US should come back to their very own sources.

      USA has NOT been practicing isolationalism since WWII. They are not called an imperial power for nothing...

      ...the US should join the EU as an equal partner...

      A superpower EQUAL to others? lol When have superpowers ever been concerned with others? If anything, USA wi

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    9. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a tyrannical government has no stability, as history has shown again and again.

      Not really true if you are practicising totalitarianism.... Perhaps the best example is colonialism. Colonial governments like Britain, Spain, etc managed to keep going for hundreads of years.


      The colonial era was governed by monarchs, not totalitarian despots.
      Soviet Union survived for quite a while and could have survived even longer if Gorbachev et al wanted to. Instead, they lost interest and that's why it collapsed. Soviet Union did NOT collapse due to a popular uprising (totalitarian regimes can crush these easily).

      The Soviet Union was in a horrible economic state which is why Gorby was progressive... he saw that reforms needed to be made.

      China has a problem feeding its people. What would happen if the US decided to cut food exports? You would probably see China collapse too, but we would rather have the 'stable' communist country than having a cash-strapped government selling off nukes to rogues.

      Taiwan is a joke, compared to China.
      It won't be a joke when we send our military over there... Taiwan is an ally.

      The ideal that maybe it wouldn't be so bad if someone else were #1 or 'can't we all just get along' is nice. But because of human nature, someone will decide they need to be at the top, and force their way to the top. That's the way it's been and always will be.

    10. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you recall, when Europe had superpowers, that's when you had wars.

      Yeah who had to come bail out europe from germany. Who had to go into Kosovo because there is no one in europe who can keep things under control? who has to push for peace between palestine and israel.

      don't get me wrong, i wish the US would say SCREW YOU and let europe and the rest of the world disintegrate into the mess it would be if the US weren't influencing it.
      But then you would complain that the US is #1... why isn't it doing anything to stop the madness!??! you can't have it both ways...

    11. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by awol · · Score: 0

      I have no real position on wheter you are right or wrong, but none of the factors you mention are the reason why China would become most powerful. China was in the position to dominate the world 2000 years ago and they basically went home and stayed home. In my opinion China will have to ensure that they keep the vast majority of their people out of the middle class (and I mean that ina technical sense) until their population falls to much lower than its current level lest they will end up with a disaster that will consume their economy to destruction. If the transition is managed well then it may well be the economy that drags Africa into the middle class as well, just to be able to feed them all.

      Indeed, I would also argue that "most powerful" is a meaningless position. What end does it serve? There are a significant number of countries who are technically self sufficient, these countries do not answer to any "power" other than the threat of military invasion and despite what people may think there is no carte blanche that enables the "most powerful" nation, no matter who it is, to act with impunity.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    12. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      Yeah who had to come bail out europe from germany.

      The impact of the US in Europe during WWII is overrated. USA entered the war late and by that time, Germany was on its way to losing (it lost the Eastern front and lost Battle of Britain). Even if USA did not enter WWII, Germany would have lost (probably 2 years later). Having said this, USA DID provide weapons and resources to the Allies even before it entered the war... and of course, the Pacific is another story (full credit to USA there).

      Kosovo was a NATO mission but I guess I wouldn't be too surprised if you consider NATO to be made up of USA only.

      ...i wish the US would say SCREW YOU and let europe and the rest of the world disintegrate into the mess it would be if the US weren't influencing it.

      Actually you are already doing it... whether you realize it or not... the neo-cons in power basically share the same ideals as you...

      ...why isn't it doing anything to stop the madness!??!

      If USA did NOT intervene, the world would be much better off! The vast majority of US military interventions are for selfish, imperialistic reasons. Consider the last 30 or 40 years: Iran, Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, Guatemala, El Salvador, Chile, Nicaragua...all resulted in thousands of deaths. The only ones where USA did anything for others would be Kosovo/Balkans, and Somalia.

      So I don't think the world's population will really miss your "help" :(

      Whether you like him or not, Charles de Gaulle said it best: "Nations have no friends; only interests"... you should think about it before death takes you away...

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    13. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by axxackall · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Education system: The US has a better starting position, but China is rapidly gaining. Chinese have thrown away all Mao anti-illectual rubbish and know to value knowledge these days.

      I am working in several projects with Chinees programmers educated back in China. Also I am working with Indian, Russian, West-Europian and North American programmers. I would say that Chinees and Russian are the best. Well, Russians are smarter a bit and their eduction is often evn overkilling, but they are slow and they do not have any sense of a discipline (like artists, they write the code they haven't been asked and they forget to write the code they've been asked). Indian programmers are very fast and have extreme sense of discipline, but that hurts their creativity a lot, besides Indian education is not really good. North American programmers are slow, with no creativity and a very poor education (most of American programmers I know barely know elementary math calculus). Chinese and West-Europian programmers are fast, disciplined and well (optimally) educated.

      Having said that I should add that Russian education is going down in its quality very rapidly. Europian ediaction keeps the same. North American education has no hope in any near time. Chinese and Indian education is growing. Thus, counting other logic (especially IP and patents) I think that China has a lot of future. All they need is to maintain a political stability by slowly giving up to their people more and more freedom, but doing it very slow (Soviet Union is collapsed b/c people receive too much of freedom rapidly at on time - too fast to egt using it properly).

      --

      Less is more !
    14. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      The colonial era was governed by monarchs, not totalitarian despots.

      I'm not so sure that you can exclude the totalitarianism label for monarchs. The local population may not consider the monarch to be totalitarian, but from a world viewpoint and from that of the oppressed, it WOULD be totalitarian. For instance, would you not consider slavery to be characteristic of totalitarianism? One would be hardpressed to tell the difference between a totalitarian and a monarch running the colonies (especially in Africa and South America).

      The Soviet Union was in a horrible economic state which is why Gorby was progressive... he saw that reforms needed to be made.

      True.. but my point was that it didn't have to collapse. If they wanted to, they could have kept going. All it would need is another "Tianamen-Square"-like episode :( The original poster's opinion was that governments such as Soviet Union would collapse easily; my view is that they won't and USSR could have kept going for another 50 years if the authoratrians wanted...

      China has a problem feeding its people. What would happen if the US decided to cut food exports? You would probably see China collapse too

      I don't think China relies on USA for much of its agricultural imports. In any case, I don't see your point. What are you saying? Everything you say is true but what's your point?

      It won't be a joke when we send our military over there... Taiwan is an ally.

      I was referring to the case where Taiwan had to fight by itself (same thing with the other countries I cited like Japan). I think that's what the original poster meant... If USA helps those countries, it will be a draw (due to WMD) but if you ignore WMD, USA will win IMO...

      The ideal that maybe it wouldn't be so bad if someone else were #1 or 'can't we all just get along' is nice. But because of human nature, someone will decide they need to be at the top, and force their way to the top. That's the way it's been and always will be.

      You are either a Machievallian (sp?) or a social/political Darwinist... in either case, I hate you people... In any case, can you prove that? Why must that be always the case? Basically, you are arguing against theories of peace, which often postulate that once you eliminate all the despots/superpowers/authoratarians, world will be at peace. You clearly believe the opposite--that you cannot eliminate these people and entities...

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    15. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by SEE · · Score: 1

      China might be marginally stronger than any Asian power, but not enough to go on the offensive.

      China has 700,000 fewer males reach military age each year than India does, the border terrain vastly favors defense, and India's military equipment is as latest-Russian as China's.

      Invading Taiwan requires the ability to invade an island. China can't get its troops across the Straits; its amphibious lift capability is so meager it couldn't land a force 10% the size of the active-duty Taiwanese army. You can't fight a war of attrition that way, no matter how hard you try.

      Neither China nor Japan posess any aircraft carriers; zero minus zero is zero, so they obviously have parity. China does have more subs, but most of those are old Romeo-class (i.e., late 1950s Soviet) designs, which might as well be oil drums with "Shoot Me" signs on them for all the good they'd do against the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Forces. Additionally, the Chinese lack of amphibious lift capability makes an invasion of Japan impossible.

    16. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are large numbers of Americans who cannot write properly (bad grammer, spelling, etc)"

      Bwahahahahaaa!!!! "Grammer"!

    17. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The confucian traditions imply total devotion to work and society."

      I keep telling people this is why Chinese do well at school, not only do they work harder, but their social connections help them a lot. Have you ever noticed a Chinese working alone at a problem in university? No, because they'll gang together 15 at a time to solve a problem, with people further along helping out by saying what kind of exams this prof gives, etc...
      Individually, they're just like anyone else. But they stick together, which is why you see so many of them in university.
      It usually goes like this:
      Family arrives from Asia.
      Opens corner store. Employees are family members so the money stays in the family.
      One member goes to university, while the rest operate the corner store, usually with apartment above the corner store, so rent is cheap.
      When member graduates university, gets good job, and now it's easier to send the rest to university.
      Within a few years of arriving on a boat, they become your bosses.

    18. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by y2rayk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would like to add that the US has the advantage in education. US universities are very selective in accepting foreign students. Students with perfect scores on standardized tests are a minimum requirement. These bright minds help with US research and not Chinese projects. In a way, one can say that US exploits China out of their brightest minds.

      BTW, I dont understand why having a conversation with a foreign student in english is difficult. They can score perfectly on standardized exams.

    19. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by antirename · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, totalitarian governments that don't acknowledge, let alone respect, the rights of their people are a GOOD thing? You must love Macchiavelli. I think the Chinese government is going to implode in the coming decades. And I'm going to enjoy watching their government leaders get hanged on CNN. Yeah, they are a large country. They are also a country with an evil government. Hopefully that government will fall soon.

    20. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      Soviet Union survived for quite a while and could have survived even longer if Gorbachev et al wanted to. Instead, they lost interest and that's why it collapsed.

      There are some social scientists (at least in Russia) who say that the Soviet Union didn't collapse at all. Yes, I know, it did break apart and the former Soviet republics are independent (and some of them even democratic) now - after all, I live in one of them - but in Russia, the changes have been on the outside. In most places outside Moscow or St Petersburg everything is still the same. They even restored the old anthem of the Soviet Union, and though the lyrics are new, most of the people still sing it the old way.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    21. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by antirename · · Score: 1

      If you don't fuck with anyone, sooner or later someone will decide that you are weak and fuck with you. The Chinese are already trying to push the US, see how far they can go. Spy plane incident? Spies in Los Alamos? Dumping goods into our markets? We need to fuck with them a little more then we are, in my opinion. Why are they spending all that money are military hardware if they aren't planning on using it? We should officially declare Taiwan a legit country and tell the mainland Chinese to go fuck off. Taking away their "most favored nation" trading status until they at least pretend to have some form of human rights law would help, for starters.

    22. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, and about the "war of attrition", the following is a joke from the days when war was almost breaking out between Soviet Union and China:

      Chinese supreme command is making plans for invasion:
      "First of all, small infantry groups will quietly cross the border. One million men in each group."
      "The tanks will move in on the flanks -- one tank on the left, the other on the right."
      "What about air support?" "No, the pilot called in sick."

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    23. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Build6 · · Score: 1

      The impact of the US in Europe during WWII is overrated. USA entered the war late and by that time, Germany was on its way to losing (it lost the Eastern front and lost Battle of Britain). Even if USA did not enter WWII, Germany would have lost (probably 2 years later).



      IANA Historian, but I think something needs to be pointed out here: nukes. Germany had their own nuke program. a 2 year delay - I don't know, I don't have the stats, but would that have been enough time for the Germans to have obtained nukes? And they had their V2 rockets to pop them all over the place.



      2 years can be a huge difference.



      OFF-TOPIC: I remember reading this story (I can't remmber if it was a novel or a short story/novella), something sci-fi/alternate history, i.e. what if Germany *had* won the war? I remember reading about this scene where the protagonist in the story had to queue up in some kind of hall to have his papers checked for his racial designation (or something like that). Can anyone refresh me memory re: the name of the story/author/anything?

    24. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Build6 · · Score: 1

      don't get me wrong, i wish the US would say SCREW YOU and let europe and the rest of the world disintegrate into the mess it would be if the US weren't influencing it.


      I am not an American, but I'd like to put in my 2 cents here. I always feel these statements - "the US should do this", "the US would do that" - are always quite pointless because of vagueness. Because what does anyone mean when they say "the US"?

      The "US" that would be doing the fighting (and dying) would be quite different from the "US" (government) that makes the decisions. It's been pointed out that the troops fighting in Iraq etc. are all basically there because, well, they're poor. They joined the Army to put food on the table, to get funds for college, etc. (leaving aside those there to Be All That They Can Be). Contrast this to the corporate executives and texan oil billionaires signing the executive orders sending them in. Which "US" is it that should be saying "SCREW YOU" to the rest of the world?

      the "US" has also changed, and will continue to change (like everythign else). Is the "US" now the same as that of Eisenhower (sorry not too sure of the name) etc. who'd face down the Nazis? From what I can tell I honestly think quite a few of the past US Presidents really were (at least mostly?) genuinely decent, smart people who were thinking along the interests of the country/people/world(?) when they made their decisions as opposed to thinking of re-election prospects, party affiliation etc.

      It really bugs me that something like that which seems to have existed before seems to now be getting ... twisted. The Florida election debacle, the possible manipulatability of future electronic voting systems - all these make guys like me worried (and not just because the US has nukes and the biggest fucking army around), because I'm from a country that exists basically because our neighbours didn't want us, while you guys have this document that starts off with "We hold these truths to be self-evident" --> no other country really compares ("oh, we're from X. we're a people and our country has basically always been around" doesn't have quite the same ring to it), and right now it's looking like it's getting really fucked up. I think if the world goes to shit in the future, if there are any historians left they'll point to now and say this is where the shit started.

    25. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by antirename · · Score: 1

      They have a lot of catching up to do. Why do they keep spending money on Russian hardware? They can't make their own. Yeah, they have a lot of guns. They don't seem to have a hell of a lot of creativity, though, and that won't change until their government does. I hope the CDC and Hacktivismo keep giving them holy hell... even the Chinese have a limit to how many fingers they can stick in the dam.

    26. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Build6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't fuck with anyone, sooner or later someone will decide that you are weak and fuck with you.


      I agree. This is how the world goes round.


      The Chinese are already trying to push the US, see how far they can go. Spy plane incident? Spies in Los Alamos? Dumping goods into our markets? We need to fuck with them a little more then we are, in my opinion.


      I'm not from China, but why do you assume only Americans (and the odd European here and there) are going to be reading Slashdot? Do you know how offensively aggressive it sounds to hear "I'm gonna fuck with your country"? This is exactly why some people dislike Americans. "All right, let's go fuck with fucking moronic Americans". How does that sound?

      And you've got to be kidding if you don't think the US doesn't spy on other countries. In which case, it's just "the game" that other people spy on the US. French agents have been caught before (this is probably not such a good example now since the French are practically "enemies", eh?). I'll bet the Israelis, Germans etc. have their people just... paying attention to what the Americans are doing. Even the British?



      Why are they spending all that money are military hardware if they aren't planning on using it?

      You answered yourself in the first place. This is a world where if you aren't strong someone will come around and push you around. Don't forget, the mainland Chinese lost millions of people to the Japanese (for which the Japanese STILL have not even brought themselves to officially and properly apologise for, would you believe it). They've fought a war with the Indians. Even when they were both Communist the Russians and the Chinese weren't all that friendly. If you've got a large country, you want a large and modern army. End of story.


      We should officially declare Taiwan a legit country and tell the mainland Chinese to go fuck off.

      I agree. I believe Taiwan is a country. But, again, you're demonstrating "American Shortsightedness Combined With Arrogance". What on earth makes you think that it's the AMERICANS who should be "declaring Taiwan a legit country"? A significant proportion (more than half if my memory serves) during their last polls indicated they themselves did not want this step to be taken. Considering the minute they do so, the shooting starts, and you are going to be sitting safely at home in the US - I am making the assumption that you are not in the US armed forces and won't be part of those getting shot at while defending Taiwan, assuming Bush doesn't back out of US commitments to do so - and Taiwanese civilians etc. are going to be doing most of the dying, if anyone is going to be declaring Taiwan a legit country it should be the Taiwanese.


      Taking away their "most favored nation" trading status

      laugh. Are you sure the Americans making the decisions are willing to lose the kind of money they will lose by doing so? Plenty of people in mainland China would be incredibly happy if the US government would lean harder to try to make them start releasing poltiical prisoners etc. - but you're forgetting it's the money that talks, including (especially?) in the US political-economic system.

    27. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Florida election debacle"

      I wish more countries would resolve their election differences the way US did.
      You people have to learn that the system worked as it was supposed to.
      Someone challenged results. State court ruled one way and was overturned by the Supreme court.
      That is how things are supposed to work.

      "smart people who were thinking along the interests of the country/people/world"

      Is that so ?
      Are you genuinely honest or are you just another human being making mistakes and bad judgments all the time ?

      "Contrast this to the corporate executives and texan oil billionaires signing the executive orders sending "

      Stop reading your leftists propaganda.
      These "billionaires" were put into office by the very people you are so worried about.

      Again, if only rest of the world would be as civilized as US is even at its worst behavior, this planet would be in a much better shape.

    28. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two contradictory statements there dear poster-

      Spy plane incident/Spies in Los Alamos?

      the first was an incident involving the US spying on China, the second was an incident involving China spying on the US.

      Dumping goods into our markets?

      thats called globalisation, of which the US is not immune.

      Why are they spending all that money are military hardware if they aren't planning on using it?

      Huh? where does one begin with this comment? The US itself spends more more money on defence than the next 10 nations altogether

    29. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by geekee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "3 Traditions: The confucian traditions imply total devotion to work and society. However, the US tradition imply total devotion to self interest and egoism. So, the Chinese society have much better chance to complete large scale and high effort projects. The US have problems there. Take e.g. Iraq we have our boys just a few months there, but already the press is whining that some of them are dying. Even worse the US economic system is based on these "values", so we can't change them without having our society collapse."

      Self interest is what has made America great. It's no coincidence that the Soviet Union collapsed and China is on a slow road toward capitalism. A person is motivated to accomplish more and work harder when he directly benefits from his effort. Communism denies this by taking the product of labor and distrubuting it based on need, rather than merit.

      " 6. Less restricted goverment: In China the goverment doesn't have to obey very much restrictions. So they don't have to spend so much money on their own people or to protect human rights. "

      People without basic freedoms are less likely to be productive since they do not benefit from their labor.

      Socialism is like feudalism, with the exception that the ruling class uses altruism as a weapon to disarm those who claim what they are doing is immoral. "It can't be immoral because I'm ruling selflessly in the name of the poor."

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    30. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. the whole Russian thing is overrated. The Russian govt is still brutal and could care less about their citizens. The recent crackdown on independent media is an example of it. Sure, the KGB might not exist anymore; but now you have the FSB...

      The govt has been replaced with the mafia now. I'm not sure which one is worse but neither of them are any good...

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    31. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      China has 700,000 fewer males reach military age each year than India does, the border terrain vastly favors defense, and India's military equipment is as latest-Russian as China's.

      But China is much stronger overall. Sure there might be less young adults but who cares? Chinese soldiers are better trained and more motivated too.

      Invading Taiwan requires the ability to invade an island. China can't get its troops across the Straits; its amphibious lift capability is so meager it couldn't land a force 10% the size of the active-duty Taiwanese army. You can't fight a war of attrition that way, no matter how hard you try.

      I'm not a military expert but I would think you would first bomb the defenses and weaken the enemy. You don't need to carry out a land assault until necessary.

      Neither China nor Japan posess any aircraft carriers;

      I didn't know that! I thought China had carriers but I guess I was wrong. I'll look it up if I can (can you double-check too?)

      Additionally, the Chinese lack of amphibious lift capability makes an invasion of Japan impossible.

      I think you are overvaluing the amphibious assaults. This isn't WWII. I think the main thing will be air assaults. Look how USA does it. USA bombs first and then when there is no resistance, they land their troops. Granted, USA has been fighting 3rd world countries so it's hard to say if this will work here. But my opinion is that if you win in the air, you can land regardless of whether your capability is weak or not.

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    32. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      Germany had their own nuke program. a 2 year delay - I don't know, I don't have the stats, but would that have been enough time for the Germans to have obtained nukes? And they had their V2 rockets to pop them all over the place.

      I don't know much about WWII (it's not my interest)... but from what I understand, Germany gave up their nuke program years earlier. I'm not 100% sure on this but I think I read that somewhere.

      what if Germany *had* won the war? I remember reading about this scene where the protagonist in the story had to queue up in some kind of hall to have his papers checked for his racial designation (or something like that).

      What would have happened IMO is probably the creation of an elitist society--far more elitist than the present day capitalist one. You would have the "Aryans" at the top controlling and benefitting from everything. Then you would have other classes (essentially races, ethnicities, etc) further down the chain, basically working as slaves. It would be similar to slave-run colonialism, except you have "Aryans" insead of monarchs (ie. limited by race/ethnicity, not blood/family).

      My personal opinion is that Nazism wouldn't have taken over the WHOLE planet. It would have been next to impossible to control the populations of Africa and Asia. I think the result would be more of a region based structure, with possibly Europe being 'whites only' and run by "Aryans" while other parts of the world will simply be harvesting grounds for slaves.

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    33. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong on China's military capability. China does not have the capability to take Taiwan. Invasions require more than numbers. China's military knows that, but the general populace does not.

      The last time China went to war it was against the Vietnamese - the Chinese lost badly.

    34. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      Scoring perfectly on an exam does not translate (pun intended) into being able to speak the language well.

      A perfect score means a student can read and write a language well, but speaking is very different (pronunciation), hence why having a conversation can be difficult.

      In my experience, foreign students I've worked with frequently comprehend the meaning of a written word but not that same word spoken.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
    35. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Steeplerot · · Score: 1

      You are playing too much Civ latley...
      Damn get outside for a bit!

      --
      Vaughn "Its always darkest before it goes pitch black."
    36. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      You are wrong on the military front. China is stronger than any other country in Asia

      It's not. A lot of people assume it is because of it's size, but it really doesn't have the capability to wage long-term, modern war.

      China could easily beat India (the presence of WMD simply means that there won't be any "real" war).

      If China incurred far enough into India to get at it's resources, India would launch nukes; they'd figure they didn't have a choice.

      Taiwan is a joke, compared to China.

      Absolutely not. Taiwan has cutting-edge stuff; the US sells them equipment that we're using ourselves. There is no way for China to invade Taiwan--the Chinese navy would be instantly detected leaving port, tracked by radar, and blown to smithereens. They can't wage war overseas, they just don't have the capability.

      Military people don't like to admit this but don't forget that there is something called "war of attrition". Basically you just keep sending your soldiers until they win by sheer numbers. China can easily do this.

      A modern war of attrition requires resources. China just doesn't have enough of them.

      They have all the latest Russian stuff

      No, they had the latest Russian stuff in the 1950's maybe. Their air force numbers under 5,000 planes, and most of them are incredibly obsolete. Hell, they're still using stuff WE gave them in WW2. Check out this link:

      http://www.comw.org/cmp/fulltext/iddschina.html for a rundown of China's military forces.

      For isntance, China has far greater number of submarines and aircraft carriers than Japan.

      China's submarines are, like most of their hardware, very, very obsolete. And China has no aircraft carriers whatsoever. If they managed to marshal the resources to build or buy one, it would be the first thing hit when war broke out.

      Not really true if you are practicising totalitarianism. The tyrannical governments that fail are non-totalitarian systems like dictatorships (one evil dude), monarchy, etc. But systems like Communism and fascism can survive for a long time. Soviet Union survived for quite a while and could have survived even longer if Gorbachev et al wanted to.

      The Soviet Union didn't last long at all. Generally totalitarianism just can't exist in a large state successfully. Look at North Korea, and what that whacko has to do to keep the system in place.

    37. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by NevDull · · Score: 1

      If you're in Mensa, you should know that geniuses are far more common than 1 in a million.

      If you're in Mensa, you should know that with one genius per million people, we'd have between 280 and 290 geniuses in the US and in the vicinity of 1300 in the P.R.O.C.

      Therefore:
      If you're in Mensa, I see no need to join. The top 2% of IQs apparently includes plenty of people unfit to participate in conversations about intelligence.

    38. Re:I think that Communist China will overtake US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese military is NOT well trained. They may be strict, but that is not well trained in the least.

      My dad has a friend that actually used to be in the chinese military. Do you know how many times he shot a REAL gun? Once, with one bullet. Their resources ARE that limited.

      First bomb the defenses? Their planes would be destroyed long before a bomb would ever reach any of their intended targets.

  34. What is meant by a Chines Linux? by GerardM · · Score: 1

    I am wondering, is this a Linux distribution or is it a breakaway project? Some time ago there were similar stories about an Asian Linux. There have been grumblings from RedHat that the Chinese were not contributing towards the "Linus" Linux. Is Asia going a seperate way with OSS and if so can someone explain why this is happening? Thanks, Gerard

    1. Re:What is meant by a Chines Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better get 2000 SCO liscences!

    2. Re:What is meant by a Chines Linux? by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      I don't follow this matter... but perhaps language may be an issue. The vast majority of Asians don't speak English and their languages are not related to English either (unlike German, etc).

      Another possibility might be government influence. Governments have immense power in Asian countries. India might be called the world's largest democracy but it is an insult all democrats everywhere. China, for instance, might be controlling its software development and placing restrictions on it. If you think RIAA is bad, wait until you figure out what these governments will let you do. Along with RIAA, they are probably official members of the dominate-the-world club ;)

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    3. Re:What is meant by a Chines Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably mean Red Flag Linux.

  35. Blazing fast!!!! by Alsee · · Score: 1

    40 teraflops Cray Red Storm AMD-based 10,000-Opteron supercomputer built for Sandia National Labs

    Just imaging how fast it could run Notepad, Solitare, or Minesweeper!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Blazing fast!!!! by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to grasp how fast it will make my Teletype ASR-33 type out text.

      Provided we can figure out the termcap setting, of course.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  36. Re:What is better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obviously, b.

  37. Yes, it runs linux, but why? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    None of the links I bothered to click on even touched - as far as my skimming of the articles revealed - anything about why the chinese has opted for a variation on Linux, instead of one of the commercial unixes, Wondows (yeah, right) or something along those lines. Does it adapt better to this scale? Is it because it's essentially free (as in 'no licenses')? If it the reds fear of a backdoor in the system if they buy a commercial product?

    Don't get me wrong, a supercomputer running on Linux is cool and all that, but I would like to know more about the logic that dictates the choice of OS in such an application. Suggestions?

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Paying for 2000 MS licenses or a free OS.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    2. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you want a super computer built only to be dependent on some foreign corperation?

    3. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Duh..Linux is Free, Open, and thus easily customizeable. It is the perfect OS for supercomputers.

    4. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all of the above, I think. Remember the Chinese gov't has its own official distro -- Red Flag Linux -- and presumably that's what this monster will be running. Linux scales well, they can tweak it to do what they want, and they know the code's secure because they can look at all of it; what's not to like? And they don't have to worry about licensing fees, of course.*

      *It's easy to be cynical about the degree to which US IP laws apply (or don't) in other countries, particularly in Communist ones, but the fact is that China is very interested in keeping good trade relations with the US.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by buddha42 · · Score: 1
      The difference between nearly any of the popular modern OS's in the 2 - 8 cpu range (what these nodes will be) is minimal.

      So linux wins on customizability and price.

    6. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have to port the code to run on a 2000 cpu farm. They can also adopt the source to fit their specific needs. What's do you want? SCO/LINUX?

    7. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      You obviouly have not seen the scientific and learning tools available throught Linux. If the Chinese had to license all that software through MS based companies or even try to dev their own with MS tools it would bankrupt them!

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    8. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by grid+geek · · Score: 1

      Rubbish. I work in the field and 2000 Windows licences is only likely to cost about $20,000. Big deal on a $90 million contract. The cost is in the system admin - 2000 nodes need some fairly advanced remote management or a huge team (no you can't have 100 sys admins).

    9. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      But why not *BSD in that case?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      If you plan on distributing comercially any changes you make to the code, then perhaps *BSD would be a better option for some. But not many.

    11. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      In true communist fashion it's going to be used to run the biggest LTSP installation ever and all citizens will have their own terminals. This should make it easier to monitor what people are viewing.

    12. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux kernel has the best support for the Opteron platform.

    13. Re:Yes, it runs linux, but why? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      If the Chinese had to license all that software through MS based companies or even try to dev their own with MS tools it would bankrupt them!

      Sounds like a good idea to me...

  38. Export? by 1stflight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought we weren't supposed to export supercomputing technologies to China? When did that change?

    1. Re:Export? by vidarh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're not. However these days anyone with a technical inclinations, lots of ordinary PC's, and free software can put a super computer together themselves. So in other words, trying to limit it have become meaningless.

    2. Re:Export? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supercomputer is build in China using CPUs manufactured in Germany. How US export restrictions apply here?

    3. Re:Export? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon? Last I checked, China (and Taiwan) build most of the world's computer parts. Monitors, CPUs, memory, chipsets, etc. When's the last time you found a chip in your computer that's marked with "Made in U.S.A."? Who says China doesn't have the facilities to build it's own systems when they a shitload of manufacturing plants?

    4. Re:Export? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the USA owns Germany, doesn't it?

      Didn't the US make Germany the 57th US state after it singlehandedly beat Cyborg SuperHitler with no help from the British or Russians at all?

      Oh wait. That's just a delusional American comic-book alternate history.

  39. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its amazing that Intel processors actually consume more heat than AMD processors but yet are the target of repeated (and not funny) jokes about AMD processors being excessively hot

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They consume heat? So they get colder and colder as they run?

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want one of those!

    3. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      ACtually, last time I looked, AMD's produced more watts of energy (ie, heat) per clock cycle. Granted, they've gotten better over the years, but Intel still runs cooler. Part of this is due to the way Intel handles being idle.

      Sure, when both AMD and Intel are running at 100% for a long time, the difference isn't THAT great. But idling there is still a big difference.

      Case-in-point. My Athlon XP 2200+ idles at 54 degrees Celsius with a big-fat 80mm heat sink/fan.

      My Intel 2.4 GHz idles at 35 degrees Celsius. The result is my room is a LOT cooler with my Intel running than my AMD.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      And by the way, both use the exact same model of case with the same number (and model) of case fans. Essentially the exact same setups, except the motherboard and CPU (HD, CD, Video card, etc are the same).

  40. Linux does not make computers faster by blair1q · · Score: 1

    I wish people would stop pretending that an operating system adds to a computer's performance.

    An operating system is overhead, and can only slow down your peak computing speed.

    1. Re:Linux does not make computers faster by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      -1 Insightless.

      OS is a necessary overhead. You can't avoid it but you can minimise it.
      In this context Linux is the least of the evils.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:Linux does not make computers faster by blair1q · · Score: 1

      -1 ignorant.

      OS is not a necessary overhead.

      Embedded OSes can be designed to disappear after transferring control to the application.

      Time slicing, interrupt handling, and other process control is a burden on a full-speed computation. Good supercomputer programmers know this.

      The OS can only be a hindrance and is not a boon to the advancement of computing limits. The story's headline is an inversion of logic. This might as well be an article about linux being used on a 10 MFLOP machine as a 10 TFLOP one.

    3. Re:Linux does not make computers faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, Linux happens to be one of those OSes that can be made to near-enough disappear when the application is loaded - it's fairly easy to make linux load the entire application into kernel-space with the appropriate patches. There's a spectrum of solutions with different tradeoffs - the most common is to simply deliberately write your application as a kernel module, but you can also choose to run user processes in the kernel memory space.

      Seeing as the application never subsequently context-switches, but can still use anything in the kernel it finds useful, the only wastage you have is memory taken up by any unused code-paths in the kernel that can't be rmmodded out, without the hassle of writing your own hardware-drivers. It's a nice approach for certain tasks.

  41. Just think... by kotj.mf · · Score: 1

    Imagine how fast they can crank out pirate copies of XP with that sumbitch...

    --
    hang brain.
  42. Im confused by huhmz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this make Linus a communist or a terrorist?

    1. Re:Im confused by nagora · · Score: 1
      Does this make Linus a communist or a terrorist?

      Yes

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  43. Dang... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that power and they'd still only get around 20fps in Doom III.

  44. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by joFFeman · · Score: 1

    yeah, that's our right as citizens of the good ol' US of A, nobody else's.

    --
    "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Call RMS! by MediaBoy77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are the odds China will release its modified GPL code to the rest of the world?

    There's a lawsuit I'd love to see. Linus Torvalds/FSF vs. The People's Republic of China.

    1. Re:Call RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who told you Chinese government is bounded to the GPL? Who owns the laws in China?

    2. Re:Call RMS! by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese would be MORE likely to release code than capitalist countries. Free or low-cost software benefits the masses, and this should be consistent with their system... Only exception would be if it were some top-secret military thingie... in that case it would be Linus Torvalds+FSF vs Chinese Military+SCO ;)

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    3. Re:Call RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since they surely won't send you the binary, why do they have to send you the source? Hmmm... have any supercomputer in your backyard? Wanna try some Chinese flavored Linux?

    4. Re:Call RMS! by antirename · · Score: 1

      The Chinese military and Chinese industry are really the same entity. Hutchinson-Whampoa is a good place to start googling. Imagine the US army owning and operating General Motors, Ford, all of the telcos and you're close. That's why, in my opinion, anything the US does that helps China economically is stupid when you look at it long term. Giving them the Panama Canal was especially stupid. Why in the FUCK did Clinton think that was OK? Oh yeah, the Chinese are trying to influence US elections, aren't they? Not a conspiracy theorist. I have to wonder how anyone smart enough to get elected to high office is that fucking stupid.

    5. Re:Call RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I understood correctly
      acording to the GPL they dont have to. If they
      dont redistribute the kernel, they dont have to
      release the source. Like companies dont have to
      release the code if they use it "in house".
      I think gpl comes into play if you redistribute
      the software in any form (binary or source).

    6. Re:Call RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That top-secret military thingie will probably not get distributed - and therefor is for "internal use"; and no publishing of source code under GPL is needed. Read the gpl.

    7. Re:Call RMS! by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese military and Chinese industry are really the same entity.

      I agree but a lot of countries are like that. Even USA is like that to a large extent. For instance, many US weapons manufacturers are considered "independent" and private but they are anything but. They are basically controlled by the military. Only difference is that in USA some private person or entity can get rich off the military whereas in China that isn't the case.

      In addition, most countries just steal technology from civilian firms if they need it. The CIA for instance would steal tech from US companies if the US military needed it.

      That's why, in my opinion, anything the US does that helps China economically is stupid when you look at it long term.

      You already know what it is like that. It's because of capitalism. All that matters under capitalism is money. If someone can make money, that's all they care. They don't care about their country, their workers, the environment, etc. This is why USA (as well as other countries) are hypocritical. Cuba is apparently a country run by evil Communists while China isn't. If anything, Cuba poses far less of a threat than China. But it doesn't matter. All that matters is money. If USA couldn't make money off China, they wouldn't do what they are doing now...

      I have to wonder how anyone smart enough to get elected to high office is that fucking stupid.

      You may like to think you are living in a democracy but nothing is further from the truth. USA is nothing more than a plutocracy. Whatever big business says gets done. Right now, big business is highly in favour of trade with China...

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
  47. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Well, do you want a bunch of loonies that hate you having the power to come over and kill you when they are in a bad mood?

    If you still answer the same way, then you are either a fool or a lier.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  48. The main project for this will be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... running dnetc clients to get into the number 1 position for rc5 cracking!

  49. Hmmm... by dark-br · · Score: 1

    Could you imagine a beouwolf..... Ahh fuck it..

    1. Re:Hmmm... by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      "Yo Momma's so fat, she produces more heat than a Beowulf cluster of Chinese supercomputers!"

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  50. What they are really trying to do... by dark-br · · Score: 1

    ...is build a computer capable of withstanding a full slashdotting.

  51. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

    Well, do you want a bunch of loonies that hate you having the power to come over and kill you when they are in a bad mood?

    One would say... 'If you have the "right" to do that, they should have the same "right"'...

    KoalaBear33

    --
    ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
  52. what about the seti network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about seti from my understanding with all the computers that are running the seti project they should be the in the number 1 position. After all there has to be well into the thousands of computers running this and although they are not the fastest or useing every cpu cycle they have to be up there whan it comes to cpu power? does anyone have any fig. on what the combined cpu power of the seti project is?

  53. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China the people don't have the opportunity to oppose the use of nuclear weapons if they wish to. A select few *unelected* men could pull the trigger if they get in a bad mood...
    We don't want our enemies to have nukes... You don't see us worried about Israel with their nukes or France or Britain. Yes China still IS a communist country. wake up.

  54. whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you imagine a shijing cluster of these?

  55. Oh wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, 10 TFLOPS peak only puts it at #6 or so.

    Secondly, 10 TFLOPS is NOTHING. PS3 will achieve 1.5 TFLOPS peak by the end of 2005 - a cluster of 6 PS3s will kick shit through this Chinese iron. The same Cell technology will be available to IBM to build true supercomputers in the same timescale. To be in the process of building a 10 TFLOPS machine today is a joke.

  56. finally a SCO poster ;) by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

    Finally a SCO poster ;) I thought you guys had strict orders not to wander near slashdot.org ;)

    KoalaBear33

    --
    ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
  57. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

    In China the people don't have the opportunity to oppose the use of nuclear weapons if they wish to. A select few *unelected* men could pull the trigger if they get in a bad mood...

    Since when did the population come into the decision making? Are you telling me that USA consulted their population before deploying the atomic weapons in Japan?

    Unelected may pull the trigger; but so do the elected...

    I'll bet USA is more concerned about Isreal's nukes than China's. There have been a few concerns from US administration officials over the last few decades over Isreal. A religious fundamentalist in Isreal is more likely to cause a nuclear war than some Communist. Have you forgotten the lessons of the Cold War?

    Of course, none of this matters to you... since you have already made up your "mind" :(

    KoalaBear33

    --
    ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
  58. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, yes Iraqi made a BIG mistake. They liked those "loonies".

  59. Then Richard Gere would make another crap movie. by chenGOD · · Score: 1
  60. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When GWB claimed that he would use nuclear when he felt being bullied, I didn't see nobody stopped him.

  61. Self-obsoleting technology by Oestergaard · · Score: 1

    So, new machines are built to aid in the development of faster, stronger, bigger and prettier nuclear weapons than we ever had before.

    However, soon there will be noone left to bomb. Then, what are the machines good for?

    The answer, of course, is seti@home! We need to start donating cycles from these computing monsters as soon as possible, to ensure that we find extraterrestrial life quickly, so that we do not run out of targets for the bombs.

    May I propose, that all sub-number-1 machines on the top500 are dedicated to seti@home as quickly as possible, to ensure that the number-1 does not obsolete itself too soon.

  62. What about... by Pinguu · · Score: 0

    a Beowulf cluster of 'em? :D

    --
    --
  63. not true by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, a large number (it might even be the majority) of the supercomputers are used for non-military applications, like scientific research, weather, geology, etc.

    I like the idea of donating these to SETI@home...

    :) KoalaBear33, waiting patiently for First Contact :)

    --
    ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
  64. Wow! 10 Teraflops... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

    ...but how much is that in comrades with adding machines?

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  65. -1 Obvious by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those?

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  66. 2000-cpu by heli0 · · Score: 1

    I'd settle for a dual Opteron board with AGP: http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20030 726/image/nge3.html

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  67. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by antirename · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Israel has nukes. If Israel nukes the Palestinians, or Iran, or Syria, I don't think the US will care much. Yeah, it would suck for a lot of innocent civilians. On the other hand, it would kill an ASSLOAD of terrorists. That nuclear threat may very well prevent another war aimed at wiping Israel off the map, which is something the Islamic countries have tried in the past. Several times. China, on the other hand, has threatened first-strike us of their nukes on US cities. That's not a very friendly thing to say. Half of their missiles are pointed at us (I live in the United States). China is a threat. Israel is not. Enough said.

  68. Cluster anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these super computers!!!!

  69. what will the interconnect be? by soldack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder what the interconnect between the nodes will be. Gigabit ethernet seems far too slow. There is Myrinet, Dolphin, and other HPC interconnects. 10Gb ethernet is still really expensive and there is only one NIC on the market (from Intel). InfiniBand would make a lot of sense...10 Gb, much cheaper than 10Gb Ethernet, much lower latency, and already supports MPI and TCP/IP offloaded sockets.
    Of course maybe for systems this large, a special machine specific interconnect makes sense.

    --
    -- soldack
  70. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by johnny0101 · · Score: 1

    You can choose not to vote for Bush in the next election. The people of China can't choose to remove Jiabao from office. Checks and balances... It not be perfect, but a least they exist in the US

    --

    ----
    In Soviet Russia, the overlords welcome you!
  71. Re:OT by bj8rn · · Score: 1

    Philip K. Dick, "Man in the High Castle"

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  72. Re:OT by Build6 · · Score: 1

    thanks. damn, is there anything Philip K. Dick didn't think of?? :-)

  73. Chinese-designed Linux operating system by J.C.B. · · Score: 1

    The new supercomputer will run a Chinese-designed Linux operating system

    I always knew that Linux was Communist, this just proves it.

  74. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, do you want a bunch of loonies that hate you having the power to come over and kill you when they are in a bad mood?

    Nope, well leave that to the US army.

  75. this kind of PR linux doesn't need, actually by Build6 · · Score: 1

    (my 2 cents worth)- I think Linux deployment is at a critical stage right now, legal challenges by SCO casting FUD around, stuff like this just gives the anti-linux entities more ammo

    Considering the past statements made by MS execs re: linux ("communist"?) - e.g. "Look, the Chinese government is happy to use linux to power their weapons. American coders - mind you, american coders who are NOT working on Microsoft platforms - are happily contributing code day and night (when not wasting their time on /.) that will be used by the Chinese military. Shouldn't Congress be doing something about it?".

  76. Ob: Young Ones by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

    Has anyone done the Beowolf gag yet?

    Stephen

    --
    "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    1. Re:Ob: Young Ones by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf, err, mountain range of these!

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  77. Re:Chinese Supercomputer:Bad News for Western Soci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Their attitude is shockingly different from the Russians who immigrated to the USA during the Soviet era." That is because China is shockingly different from USSR and from the image of an ultra evil state that the Western media has build up over the years. Are you telling me that you know more about China than people who have lived there for most of their lives? That you care more about the well beings of those people than themselves?

    "By contrast, the Chinese immigrants feel that a Chinese supercomputer challenging the best American supercomputer is a wonderful thing." Please make sense! Are you saying that Chinese people should feel good about been left behind in technological advancements?

    Of course China is no where near a model society for human right and personal freedom at its current state. It still needs much reform and breaking down of the current system to improve the lives of average Chinese citizen. But tell a real Chinese about your fabricated horror stories about the evilness of Chinese government and see how much their agree with you? When you find out about their disagreements with you, are you going to insist that they hold a false view of what is like to be a real Chinese and you are the true protector of Chinese human right?

    It is ironic how some people of some Western countries, especially those who had grossly violated other people's human rights and freedom, through acts of forced opium trade, slavery, genocide, and centuries of aggressions and wars, quickly turned around to lecture to the same people whom they thoroughly oppressed, about the need for human rights and freedoms. Why Chinese need to have their own supercomputers? To avoid another Nanjing Massacre, to avoid another Unit 731, to avoid another era of been forced to allow its people to take deadly drugs at the points of gunships from drug smuggling empire who proclaim to hold a higher moral ground.

    If you care at all about the well being of Chinese people, give Chinese people peace and time to develop. Did US become a championed of human right protector overnight? Although its constitution dictated that all human being should be treated equally, was that the practice of US until 1960s? Should another great power, if there was one, step in and
    take over US at a time when brutal violation of human rights and freedoms took place in US, in an effort to help US citizens? Democracy is a great concept, so let Chinese people have a chance to develop towards that goal after centuries of chaos and war, instead of been forced to face yet more hostile foreign forces.

  78. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, cause China is the only major nuclear power to declare a non first-strike policy. On the other hand, it is the threats of nuclear weapon, from both US and USSR, in 50s and 60s, that has pushed the development of Chinese nuclear program.

  79. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is actually reply to antirename (556799).

  80. NO your just wrong... by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    No your simply wrong... ever since the p4 intel has always produced more heat but has provided better cooling solutions. All p4's come with heatspreaders and high quality heatsinks. AMD's haven't come out with a heat spreader as of yet (opterons have them though, and possibly the a64's) and their heatsinks are almost always worse then intel's.

    Top intel processors produce more then 89 watts at full power while amd maxes around 70 watts. Intel is continuing the trend with their new prescott 3.6 ghz processor at around 119 watts.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  81. Congress should help FSF/GPL by gaemon · · Score: 1

    The only legal attack that US gov could take about this supercomputer would be urging China gov to recontribute the kernel code. As I know of, they already adopted linux (don't know if its kernel tho) to use them in China gov, but I didn't hear their change (mostly I18N I think) was patched back.

    Without action, China will never patch back the code for this supercomputer spontaneously. The C|Net article toutes `National Pride' thing, but they would consider the kernel code as `National Property': that's Chinese line of thought.

  82. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by antirename · · Score: 1

    They may have declared that. Who cares, though, if thier military has stated that they will nuke LA if the US interferes in a China/Taiwan conflict?

  83. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by joFFeman · · Score: 1

    they don't hate me. they hate the way the US government is exploiting and/or destroying them, and i tend to agree. i believe in the right to bear arms, but i don't believe that right should be exclusive to my home country. the fact is, if they didn't have a reason to hate us, the weaponry would be a non-issue.

    --
    "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  84. No they hate the citizens by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    They hate us personally and the freedoms we ( sort of ) still have.

    True not ALL do, but the vast majority of them really hate our guts. Actually most countries are like that, except the truely devloped ones like Brittian and Russia.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:No they hate the citizens by joFFeman · · Score: 1

      i don't hear them cursing my name personally, only the names of the politicians that were [supposedly] elected to 'represent my interests'. oh yeah, and sometimes leaders in the religion business. i don't hold the same beliefs as those chaps, so i don't see it as an attack on myself so much as a society that deserves to be attacked. i don't see random residential areas in the USA being bombed by extremists. the world trade center was an icon of a culture that doesn't do a hell of a lot of good for anyone but the wealthy fops who partake in it. being that i wouldn't make a very good target, i'm simply not afraid.

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  85. Re:Good? by Progman2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The US hasn't performed live nuclear tests in quite a while (20 years?). There are two reasons why sims aren't enough: 1) They are based on theories that don't always match reality and 2) they cannot simulate *everything*.

    Don't get me wrong, theories and simulations are great for preliminary work, but in the end you have to test it to be sure. On the wall over my monitor right now is a board from the Cray 1-S/1000, used at Kirtland AFB in 1980 for blast effects sims.

    Besides, the world could use a good 10-30 megaton test every decade or so. It would give the media a chance to remind everyone just how dangerous and powerful they are. Good photo op, too. :)

  86. Don't! by konquered · · Score: 1

    - Hey, John, imagine a...
    - Shut up!
    - beowulf..
    - I won't say it twice!
    - cluster...
    - *bang*

  87. Speaking of new supercomputers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised no one has mentioned this:

    http://phys.columbia.edu/~cqft/qcdoc/qcdoc.htm

    it seems more impressive, expecially considering the communication speed between processors

  88. Speechless by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Im so appalled by the ease in which you dismiss all that died on 9/11, beacuse you view them as 'wealthy fops'.

    The individuals who died were people, trying to make a living to support their family when they were wiped out of existance by some lunatic that hated ALL Americans... beacuse of what we have, beacuse what our forefathers sacrificed to reach this point, and the sacrifices we have made since then to retain it.

    People like you make me sick. You dont deserve to live in america

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Speechless by joFFeman · · Score: 1

      i didn't dismiss all who died. i said the targeting of the world trade center wasn't centered around american citizens as a whole. i don't believe in violence as a solution, and killing is killing, plain and simple- but the world trade center was THE icon of western imperialism, regardless. why don't i deserve to live in the USA? seems i value my freedom of speech quite highly and i haven't thrown jabs at the core of the country, just the disease it has become.

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
    2. Re:Speechless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More people here in the US die of heart disease in any given 36 hour period than died as a result of "terrorism" in the entire year of 2001.

      If you really want to save the most lives possible, fear cheeseburgers and fries instead of "terror".

      Because let's face it - a bunch of lunatics crashing a couple of planes is not the end of the world as we know it. The media has taught you otherwise.

      I say: Forgive and forget. Patch up our differences and live together happily. Nobody ever sets out to be "evil".

      Bombing and hating the rest of the world only generates martyrs - and hate back.

      Look how quickly the US used up the good will the world had towards them after 9/11, and imagine how much of a better place the world would be if the US had used that goodwill properly.

  89. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

    When are you people going to ever realize it? Greater unstability in the Middle East will actually hurt USA more than anything else. This is what has been happening for years. If Isreal nukes other countries, it will create MORE terrorists. Sure you might get rid of a few thousand in the process, but it will create far more...

    KoalaBear33

    --
    ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
  90. How do you say in Chinese Skynet? by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    So "sky" is "tian". How is "net" in Chinese?

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  91. Only three stories high? by DonTrippione · · Score: 1

    ...bamboo scaffolding can go up to ten stories high!

  92. Chinese Linux? What do they call it? by macmastery · · Score: 1

    Chinux?

  93. Re:Chinese Supercomputer:Bad News for Western Soci by IM6100 · · Score: 1
    It is ironic how some people of some Western countries, especially those who had grossly violated other people's human rights and freedom, through acts of forced opium trade, slavery, genocide, and centuries of aggressions and wars, quickly turned around to lecture to the same people whom they thoroughly oppressed, about the need for human rights and freedoms. Why Chinese need to have their own supercomputers? To avoid another Nanjing Massacre, to avoid another Unit 731, to avoid another era of been forced to allow its people to take deadly drugs at the points of gunships from drug smuggling empire who proclaim to hold a higher moral ground.


    It's all fine and well to pound the drum of Chinese Nationalism, but please, can't you cite instances of Western Imperialism newer than the 'gunboat diplomacy' of the 19th Century British?

    Or is that the level of injustice that the Chinese government is barely superior to??
    --
    A Good Intro to NetBS
  94. 0.001% CPU usage donation.. by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 1

    would sure make for a happy Chinese counterstrike clan.

  95. Communist OS by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all...

  96. LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think I've laughed that much at any comment posted to slashdot.

    Then again it is 5:30AM and I'm tired, so that might have something to do with it.

    Either way: LOL

  97. there is no gravity at the earths core ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is no gravity at the core (mayor flaw in the else-wise very good movie "the Core").

    if this stuff would melt towards the core it would stop there!

    if you could/would dig a well thru the earth's core and out the other side and would then jump into it, you would pendel from one side to the other infinitely ... yeah yeah aerodynamics ...

    1. Re:there is no gravity at the earths core ... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know. However, I didn't make up the term China Syndrome or the definition. I think their idea was that it would simply melt down following the flow of gravity (in otherwards, towards what little kids think they're gonna do when they dig a deep hole "to china.") But in the end, would just make it to the core and stop.

      Either way, it doesn't matter, such a thing would mess things up royaly in the surrounding area.

  98. Different concept between a burger and a terrorist by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Yes I know that burgers kill more people then terrorists in MY country, that doesn't mean we shouldn't try to eat healthy. ( to extrapolate on your ludicrous example ).

    There is this concept of 'intent'. The people flipping that burger ( that you have a CHOICE on if you eat or not ) doesn't want to kill you because of your freedoms. However the terrorist does.

    Totally different concept.

    Live and forget? That is a good way to get yourself killed. they NEVER forget, they only go into hiding until the next opportunity.

    All of their kind should all be wiped out. Completely, nothing held back, no 'politically correct maneuvers'. Death. Simple as that..
    ( oh, and anyone that stands in our way to that objective too.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  99. Re:Different concept between a burger and a terror by joFFeman · · Score: 1

    and you said i was insensitive, you're calling for genocide.

    --
    "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  100. Yes i am by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    But only of the dangerous undesireables. So it really doesnt count.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Yes i am by joFFeman · · Score: 1

      humanity isn't relative. no life is worth more than any other.

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  101. Re:Chinese Supercomputer:Bad News for Western Soci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are 2 points in reply to your comment:

    1. The Opium war was the just the start, not the end to a long series foreign aggression that lasted well into 1960s when China had to fight border war with USSR over its island in northern Manchuria. Britain was just one of the imperial powers. Countries that had aggressively pursued imperialism in China also included Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Portugal, Russia, Spain, and USA to various degrees. Till today, Russia still holds huge quantity of lands in what was original part of northern Manchuria. Japan still holds islands off the Chinese coast that it invaded during WWII. Perhaps you would feel better if I removed the word "Western" in my original post to include Japan which was probably the most recent and barbaric of all? It does not however change my argument at all. I would like to comment that I admire countries such as Britain and Germany for having the courage to face the past in an effort to move on to a better future.

    2. You are missing the point of my examples. I'm certainly not trying to use these examples as the standards to measure the current Chinese government against and to point fingers to say, "See? We are much better than that!", because it is not much to begin with. Instead, I was trying to show the long processes of obtaining Democracy and true recognition for human rights. If it took so long for other countries to do so, why be so quick to attack China in transforming the largest population on earth with one of the longest traditions to a modern Democracy without having your facts straight? Do you truly believe that been openly hostile encourage openness and reform?

    I guess I really have a 3rd point to your reply, what I stated were merely comments made from a perspective with Chinese interests in mind. If that can be called Nationalism, then what do you call some of the comments in this thread? Racism? Imperialism?

  102. Re:Yikes.. military useage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What comes around goes around. It is your kind of mentality that is creating more and more unfriendly feelings toward US. It is a self fulfiling prophecy. In fact, I think US needs to have a constant enemy to fight against, if there is no one, fabricate one. You don't think all those nukes and biological and chemical weapons of US are setting in storage without have been targetted to specific countries?

  103. Kentucky does it cheaper... by tfulton2 · · Score: 1

    ...with about $40k for a 1-teraflop array. Unfortunately, our local RealShities paper, the Lexington Herald-Leader, does not have the article in the archives. It appeared in Monday's edition. A 128-machine Linux array built largely by volunteers, for $40k [pizza included].

    1. Re:Kentucky does it cheaper... by tfulton2 · · Score: 1

      Not in the H-L at all [Doh]. Try the Kernel for details. Prof. Hank Dietz was hired away from Purdue via the "Bucks for Brains" program at UK.

  104. MODERATOR. MOD PARENT UP, PLEASE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There is nothing in the parent article that could be construed as trolling or flamebait. The writer backs up what she says with quality links to quality articles. The writer does not attack anyone.

    It appears that some moderators have an agenda. Why does criticism of Chinese nationals or China automatically qualify an article to be modded down? There are numerous articles that criticize America and Americans, yet they are not modded down.

  105. Re:Bogus logic about "more time" for western world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If it took so long for other countries to do so, why be so quick to attack China in transforming the largest population on earth with one of the longest traditions to a modern Democracy without having your facts straight?

    I find this line of reasoning that western countries have had "more time" than the old world countries (like China and India) to develop into human rights respecting societies, to be totally bogus. Countries such an China and India have been "civilized" for more than 5000 years when most of modern day Europe was very uncivilized. In fact, if these old countries had not screwed their own people for thousands of years, they would/should have been the flag-bearer of human rights and teaching the Europeans about that. What prevented the Chinese from becoming a full fledged democracy by, say, 500 AD ? Definitely, not the westerners.

    The bottom line is that the old world always tries to put the blame of their backwardness on only one of the contributing factors (western exploitation) while trying to cover up the horrible exploitive nature of their own societies. As they say, with friends like that who needs enemies ? Almost always, the colonial powers (and their modern day neo-colonial counterparts) have made use of the already existing exploitive infrastructure in these countries to their own advantage. Basically, the "external exploiters" have always been aided willingly/unwillingly by "internal exploiters". And these "internal exploiters" have always been an integral part of these old societies for a few thousand years. Why deny that ?

    You old boys screwed yourselves long before the new parasites hit you. So grow up and and destroy the demons within before blaming the demons without.

  106. Re:MODERATOR. MOD PARENT UP, PLEASE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its trolling at best since it makes it appear as if a supercomputer in China is the same as a "death to America" anthrax package. If the Chinese can build a supercomputer, so be it. People are free to advance technologically anywhere in the world. I would understand if the criticism is about China blowing money on expensive machines when its people are going hungry but thats not what the stupid post is about. In any case, I know of US cities where the govt builds football statiums to satisfy powerful interests while closing down schools because of lack of money. So, who's gonna blame whom ?