Slashdot Mirror


Chinese "Dragon" Chip On Sale

mrseigen writes "The processor that Chinese firms have been working on as a response to foreign equipment and software is now available for pre-order. The Inquirer did an article here, and the company website is here. The chip will supposedly ship with Midori Linux."

90 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It may not be a good idea to overclock these chips, as the dragons will most likely be hot enough as is...

  2. Use caution by egg+troll · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah but an hour after you install it, you want to order another one.

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  3. namespace collision by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, I can think of about 100 products or companies that are all named "Midori". Either people really like melon liqueur, or the rampant fanboyism really has to stop.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:namespace collision by Gareman · · Score: 5, Informative
      Midori is Japanese for "green", by the way. Nothing particularly special about the name.

      Try:

      Akai: Red Kuroi: Black Aoi: Blue Shiroi: White Murasaki: Purple

    2. Re:namespace collision by mcdrewski42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The TM can be for the logo, symbol, wording etc.

      In this case I would assume that they could not claim rights to the word (as posted above it's the Japanese word for Green), but to the presentation/logo of the word/mark.

      For example, if you check out one of Australia's largest banks, The Commonwealth Bank you will see that the 'mm' characters are glued together in the word. The word commonwealth can't be copyrighted, but the logo when the 'mm' is glued together like that can.

      --
      /* affect != effect */ void affect(int *thing,int effect) { *thing += effect; }
    3. Re:namespace collision by Party+Remover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're so cool.

      I don't know Japanese, so I thought it was pretty cool. Certainly cooler (and less common) than yet another grumpy hater who's got to have the last word...why couldn't you just take your Funny mod and call it a night?

  4. Midori -- Stale Distro? by jalexand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why would they ship with a linux distro that hasn't been updated in two years?

    1. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by Rational+Nerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      The way I read the article they are using the Midori distro because of the support for written Chinese (not specific on the dialect).

    2. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Interesting
      they are using the Midori distro because of the support for written Chinese (not specific on the dialect)

      When dealing with the Chinese written language, dialect is more or less irrelevant. The only issue is whether to support 'traditional' or 'simplified' Chinese characters. In mainland China, simplified characters (introduced when the communists took control) is usually desired. In Taiwan and elsewhere, traditional characters are usually employed. When using Unicode, this is almost entirely a font issue. When using older doublebyte character sets, the appropriate encoding system must be supported. I am not absolutely certain, but I think Midori supports everything commonly used.

  5. The case sticker!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh man! It's gonna say "Enter the Dragon" isn't it!!!

    1. Re:The case sticker!! by KReilly · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I would buy just for the sticker! Seriously though, they do have a way better naming scheme then intel and amd...
      It just sounds cool.
      "So Whats in your rig?"
      "A dragon.."

      If nothing else, we should see the sales in these shirts go up halfling

    2. Re:The case sticker!! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like Via's scheme...

      a) What's in the rig?
      b) Oh, C4.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:The case sticker!! by Hellkitten · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's gonna say "Enter the Dragon" isn't it!!!

      Yep, and on smp boxes it's gonna show the edge of an old map and in the white unexplored areas it's gonna say "Here be dragons"

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  6. Sure i'll buy one by zephc · · Score: 5, Funny

    but only if the money is used to torture political dissidents

    [/joke-notice-for-the-humorless]

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Bendy+Chief · · Score: 3, Informative
      Free Tibet

      In this context, your post is a little funny, but the flagrant abuses of Tibet that China has perpetrated since the 1950s are inexcusable. The fact that China is even allowed NEAR the United Nations is a gross mockery of justice.

      I know I'm evangelizing here, but people need to know that one of North America's big trading partners uses techniques every bit as brutal and inhuman as Saddam Hussein's.

    2. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I know I'm evangelizing here, but people need to know that one of North America's big trading partners uses techniques every bit as brutal and inhuman as Saddam Hussein's.

      Does Tibet have any oil?

    3. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Informative
      let's get some facts out about tibet and china before anything gets out of hand:
      • tibet was a province of china until 1911. it was a sovereign nation for 39 years before the 1950 invasion by the pla
      • tibet was not, during that time or before a democracy... or even anything remotely like one
      • tibet was, in fact, an oligarchical theocracy before the invasion. over 90% of the population were "landless serfs" which basically means "plantation slave".
      • the reasons for the 1950 invasion by the pla were threefold: 1) to acquire strategic position between pro-western india and china at the height of the cold war 2) to regain the territory of 1911 3) to liberate the 90% of the population from slavery with what was seen as then as a pro-people ideology (maoism) - remember, the chinese revolution itself was very young and idealistic at that time.
      • after the initial invasion, the dali lama was allowed to keep his existing position and control and send a delegation to beijing. this lasted until the dali lama encouraged his followers to rise up against the pla in 1959. dali lama had to have known that this uprising was doomed to failure, massive deaths of tibetans and resulting repercussions.
      • the chinese government has spent an enormous amount of money on the modernization of tibet - roads, schools, industry an airport.
      • one of the primary changes china made to tibet was land reform. peasants in china now are owner/operators of their own farms and not slaves as they were under the theocracy before the invasion
      • reng rong, the general in charge of the tibet occupation was sacked in 1979 for incompetence. he had failed to bring tibet up to the standard beijing had desired.

        no point. just some facts. a refreshing change of pace for slashdot.

    4. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, and Hitler built the Autobahn. So what?

      All of the statements above are true, but it is also true that the oligarchal theocracy of the Dalai Llama never had anyone killed for trying to leave the country.

      Also, you omitted the overriding reason for the invasion of Tibet: Mao needed to divert the attention of his subjects from his incompetence in agricultural policy, which was killing millions of chinese through starvation.

      Far better to gloat about how the Tibetans were "liberated" (and gloss over the fact that the subjects of the Mao Dynasty were just as much enslaved as the Tibetans had ever been), than to let people talk about how many villages had been wiped out by the PLA for having the affrontery to try to keep enough of their harvest to stay alive for another year.

      Mao was a very lucky thug. He was not a Great Man,but just a long-winded cuthroat at the right place and the right time to beat Stalin's record.

      You left-wing whiners sure like to cut history's greatest mass-murderer a lot of slack, don't you?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is there any truth to the argument that things improved a lot in Tibet when the Chinese took over?

      Depends on what you mean by "improved". They've got more roads, schools, and other infrastructure now, but Tibetans are far more likely to get thrown in jail and deliberately infected with tuberculosis than they were under the Dalai Llama.

      The schools teach reading, math, and science, but the propaganda they pass off as history is rather more blatantly false than you get in most western countries.

      There is also the fact that the roads were built largely by prisoners who had comitted no act that a decent person would consider a crime..

      Better? It's all a matter of how you look at it, isn't it?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:Sure i'll buy one by uradu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Yeah, and Hitler built the Autobahn.

      I was thinking "what did the Romans ever do for us?" You're right on the spot there, even though I'm sort of a "left-wing" (non)whiner. Another question to ask is: what does it matter what you did for them, if the Tibetans don't want you?

    7. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Dumbush · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know what's creepy? Check this out:

      Also, you omitted the overriding reason for the invasion of Iraq: Bush needed to divert the attention of his subjects from his incompetence in economic policy, which was killing millions of American through puverty.

      Far better to gloat about how the Iraqis were "liberated" (and gloss over the fact that the subjects of the US imperalism were just as much enslaved as the Iraqis had ever been), than to let people talk about the actual uncertain state of Iraq

      Bush was a very lucky thug. He was not a Great Man,but just a long-winded cuthroat at the right place and the right time to beat everybody's record.

      your left-winger statment is just dumb. No comment

    8. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bush needed to divert the attention of his subjects from his incompetence in economic policy, which was killing millions of American through puverty

      Killing millions of Americans through poverty?

      That's horrible! Something would have to be done about that, if it weren't for the fact that you just made it up.

      While I have my qualms about Bush's administration, I will still point out that a diatribe like the one you posted above does a piss-poor job of answering any real concerns. Pretending that Bush == Mao is asinine.

      (Yeah, I object to getting searched at an airport, but comparing it to mass murder is the kind of hyperbole that makes it easy for the proponents of Ashcroft's program to dismiss any objectors as irresponsible.)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:Sure i'll buy one by dmiller · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, you omitted the overriding reason for the invasion of Tibet: Mao needed to divert the attention of his subjects from his incompetence in agricultural policy, which was killing millions of chinese through starvation.

      Heaven help us if our governments start unnecessary wars to distract us from domestic issues!

    10. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better check your "facts."

      Tibet has been an independent country (even an empire at times) in Central Asia since about 1000 BCE. Tibet was taken over by the Chinese with help from the British in 1904. Go read up on Col. Younghusband's expedition. Basically, Tibet got caught in the middle of the "Great Game" between the British Indian Empire and the expansionist Russian Czars. The Chinese persuaded the Brits that Tibet was theirs. The Brits were happy to go along because the Chinese were a friendly semi-puppet of the West as a result of the Opium Wars. Tibet appeared to be talking with the Russian Czar, something the Brits could not tolerate. Tibet threw out the Chinese and restored their sovereignty after the Chinese revolution of 1911.

      It was the CIA which was at least partly responsible for the 1959 problems. They were smuggling guns into Tibet with the help of the Nepalese. But giving guns to people who have such a reverence for life that they don't want to harm earthworms while digging irrigation trenches is not exactly a recipe for a successful revolution.

      The Chinese did a rather thorough job of destroying Tibetan culture during the Cultural Revolution. Most of the monasteries were sacked, libraries burned, etc. Anyone trekking on the North side of Mt Everest can see the remnants of the Rongbuk Monastery for themselves. The Tibetans were forced to grow wheat in place of their native barley resulting in a bad famine during the 1960s[1]. The Chinese are currently moving large numbers of non-Tibetans into Tibet in order to reinforce their claims to Tibet by eventually dwarfing the native population.

      Yes, Tibet was an oligarchical theocracy before the Chinese invaded. Funny how the senior lamas always seemed to be reincarnated into the upper crust families. But that is true today, too. Its just that the oligarchy is living in Bejing and the theology is now Communism (or whatever is left of it). Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...

      Oh, and India was one of the leaders of the Non-Aligned Movement, quite friendly with the Soviet Union and not all that pro Western. In fact Nehru thought that India and China had a lot in common and was quite shocked when Mao took some strategic hills from India a few years after China conquered India.

      [1] If you ever get into the Himalayas, check out the native barley beer known as chang. It is unfiltered, so you'll find the dregs floating in your cup. At 12,000+ ft altitudes it'll get you quite toasted quite fast.

    11. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would you then care to explain why Hitler's first order of business was to imprison/execute every communist in Germany?

      Woah, I guess you got me there! If Hitler killed communists, then he couldn't have been a socialist, huh?

      Wrong.

      Actually, killing the pinkos wasn't his first order of business, it's just that attacking the communists was a pretty easy sell at the time. (Just like it was easier to sell the idea of euthanasia of the handicapped, before gearing up for genocide.)

      Russia had been under Lenin, and then Stalin's yoke for quite a while by that point, and any idiot could see that communism was a Very Bad Idea.

      The reason that Hitler wanted the communists eliminated, is that they were a rival to his own brand of socialism. Communism and fascism both preached the supremacy of the collective (be it the Volk or the Proletariat) over the individual, and exhorted the unfortunate residents of the lands they siezed in their respective putsches to willingly die for the Führer and the Vaterland in the case of Germany, or for Stalin and the Rodina in the case of Russia.

      You may also take note, that religious zealots are generally more vicious with the heretic than the infidel. Heretics, being closer to one's own way, are more likely to win converts, and are thus a greater threat than out-and-out heathens. It's entirely normal for variants of one kind of institutionalized insanity (like the Nazis and the Commies) to be at each other's throats.

      Hitler's support among non-socialists, I attribute to desperation. Germany was in complete economic collapse, and the people were willing to turn to any vicious little thug who promised to get a lid on it all.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Troed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ... and Israel is demolishing Palestinian houses on Palestinian land so that they can build the Berlin Wall #2.

      Israel, which is defended by the US at all cost.

    13. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Troed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having objections to what the occupant nation of Israel is doing is NOT anti-semitic, for two reasons:

      *) Arabs are semites
      *) I have nothing against the jewish people, I do care about what the state of Israel is doing though

      ... until you learn to separate "Opinions on Israel" with "Anti-semitic rantings" I suggest you stay away from any discussions on the matter.

    14. Re:Sure i'll buy one by greenrd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For the record: Hitler was a socialist. The attempts by other socialists to distance themselves from his particular brand of socialism do not change the fact.

      Sure... if you redefine the word socialist to be so broad that it includes a vast number of people not normally thought of as socialist. Your definition seems to be "putting the collective above the individual and encouraging people to die for their country". Well, first off, "encouraging people to go and die for their country" is not exactly an innovation. It's as old as the hills. It's not exactly a good distinguishing characteristic. What monarchy, dictatorship, democracy or totalitarian system hasn't tried to dupe its population with patriotism?

      Secondly, as for "putting the collective above the individual". If by that you mean putting the State above individual rights, sure, then Julius Caesar was a socialist, then notorious torturer General Pinochet was a socialist, then Dubya is a socialist.

      But that's simply fatuous. That definition is way too broad.

      If you mean putting the general welfare (i.e. the welfare of the whole population) above all individual rights, that's actually a self-contradictory definition! How can you assert that Hitler looked after the general welfare while persecuting the Jews, the communists, the gays, other political opponents, and generally striking fear into people's hearts?

      It would be like calling a govenor who regularly rounds up and shoots 1% of the population of a state, a "benevolent ruler". It's rubbish. That's not looking after the general welfare, it's tyrrany.

      For the same reason, I would argue that Stalin and Pol Pot, for example, were not socialists or communists, despite the fact that they used that kind of rhetoric.

      For a better definition, I would refer you to the MSF:

      "The Movement for a Socialist Future unites all those who oppose the rule of the global corporations and "Third Way" governments like New Labour. We support all those fighting injustice, people struggling everywhere for cultural independence, self-determination and diversity and in defence of the environment. We campaign for a new, not-for-profit society based on co-operation not competition, with mass democratic control of the economy and the state."
      That, in a nutshell, is what contemporary socialism is all about. It's not terribly complicated. Hitler, as the leader of a racist, far-right-wing political party, was the very opposite of socialist.

      I could also say "Hitler was a conservative. That's a fact."... if I define "conservative" as "racist bigot". You can say anything you like if you redefine the words... but that's not a very convincing form of argument.

  7. China is enormous by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And will be an enormous economic force in years to come.

    If they reduce their reliance on foreign IP (or non-free foreign IP) as well as foreign hardware, this can only be good for China, and only be bad for us (Less money flow into the IT industry) unless they produce a higher quality product (thus improving the industry).

    However, in the short term, you know, MS won't make as much money, neither will Intel, and I'm sure a lot of /.ers are really happy about that.

    --
    The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    1. Re:China is enormous by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      MS won't make as much money, neither will Intel, and I'm sure a lot of /.ers are really happy about that.

      Many /.ers are blissfully unaware that they can buy $400 "boxen" thanks to Microsoft. That's how much Windows has commoditized the hardware markets. Of course, if Wintel gets into trouble then... no more cheap "boxen" to run Linux or BSD. Everyone will look back at the wonderful days of the "Microsoft tax" if that happens.

    2. Re:China is enormous by Dr.Hair · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Less money may flow in to the US IT industry or North American IT industry.

      Adding a new player in to the chip industry means that MORE money as a whole will flow in to the global IT industry. And then there is support and the rest of the follow-ons to the chip fabrication, which will produce new opportunities for revenue for the IT industry, including North America and Europe, if people choose to use the architecture.

    3. Re:China is enormous by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You oversimplify. But you are correct in too many ways for me to nitpick.

      A lot of factors have contributed to the $400 box, and Microsoft did so by arguably (and I say arguably only because this is /. and someone will argue with me) creating the PC market as it is now. AMD helped by giving Intel some real competition as well.

      All of the people who own PC's, MS, the marketing juggernaut pushed for that. One of the good things they did for the industry that few here recognize (either willingly or out of blind hatred). Anyone who remembers how expensive hardware was wayyy back in the day, knows this.

      The more demand, the cheaper the products can be produced and the more competition.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    4. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > Many /.ers are blissfully unaware that they can buy $400 "boxen" thanks to Microsoft.

      Many MS lovers are quite unaware of History. Wait, make that most US people totally ignore History.

      The fact is that there was cheap computing before Microsoft. Several flavors of it, at that: CP/M which MS cloned, Sinclair, TRS-80... each had a thriving market with several vendors, and the CP/M had quite a MS-like effect of commoditising hardware.

      What IBM, not MS, did with the PC was to create a middle ground between toy microcomputers and midrange computers that was powerful enough to run real numbers in it, and respectable enough to be bought for office usage.

      One can argue that, were MS honest, it would have persisted in migrating its MS-DOS users to Xenix, and we'd have better quality systems today, perhaps even faster, perhaps even cheaper, perhaps simply more reliable. Even without MS being honest, the Unix vendors could have made it had they stopped trying to pull proprietary lock-in on their customers. There is no reason to believe that MS alone gave us commodity systems.

      Not to mention cheap boxes are usually trash. I'd rather have a FireWire, SCSI, USB, PostScript system than a USB, IDE, PS/2, PCL system anytime...

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    5. Re:China is enormous by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Low hardware prices occur because of competition between hardware vendors combined with technology allowing cheap production. Macintosh and SunSparc were not more expensive because of some defect in the software they used. They were more expensive because the hardware was proprietary.

      IBM deserve credit for making the IBM PC an open standard plus making PCs credible in a business setting. Once that decision was made and Intel, AMD, IBM, Seagate and others produced inexpensive parts that IBM PCs could leverage, cheap PCs were going to happen.

      The only area where it can be argued Microsoft helped (by later having a desktop monopoly) was to make it easier, and thus a little cheaper, for peripheral suppliers who only needed to target drivers for one platform (except, of course, Windows has never been very compatible with Windows).

    6. Re:China is enormous by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2, Informative

      IBM deserve credit for making the IBM PC an open standard

      IBM didn't make it an open standard. It was Compaq and others that started shipping clones using a reverse engineered BIOS that opened the door. IBM made the PC credible, that is true, but IBM had no intention of making it open.

      Fact is, nobody with any real measure of marketshare wants things open - since that's paving the avenue for competitors to run them down. Openness is something that the underdogs introduce out of necessity, which Compaq was at the time.

    7. Re:China is enormous by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Informative
      It is true that Compaq (and others) reverse engineered the BIOS in order to avoid paying license fees to IBM. This was made a lot easier by the fact that IBM published the ROM BIOS specification. A good short summary of the original IBM PC Concept is available in the Wikipedia. This states in part:

      The original PC was an IBM attempt to get into the home computer market then dominated by the Apple II.

      Rather than going through the usual IBM design process, which had already failed to design an affordable microcomputer (for example the failed IBM 5100), a special team were assembled to bypass normal company restrictions and get soemthing to market rapidly. The project was given the code name Project Chess.

      The team consisted of just 12 people headed by William Lowe. They succeeded - development of the PC took about a year. To achieve this they first decided to build the machine with "off-the-shelf" parts from a variety of different Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM)s and countries. Previously IBM had developed their own components. Second they decided on an open architecture so that other manufacturers could produce and sell compatible machines - the IBM PC compatibles, so the specification of the ROM BIOS was published. IBM hoped to maintain their position in the market by royalties from licencing the BIOS, and by keeping ahead of the competition.

      Unfortunately for IBM, other manufacturers rapidly reverse engineered the BIOS to produce their own royalty-free versions. (Compaq Computer Corporation manufactured the first cloned IBM PC compatible in 1984)

  8. Why on earth would I buy... by DavidBrown · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a Dragon chip in the Year of the Ram? Dragon chips are so 4698. (Year 2000 for Gregorian Calendar fanatics out there)

    I'd rather buy a Ram chip - at least that way I know I'm being current.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    1. Re:Why on earth would I buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excuse me, you should read Article.

      He says, DRAGON Chip support RAM Chip. He control even four RAM Chip!

      So, why you throw chip? This year should Ok to buy.

  9. Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only problem is that these "dragon chips" are about equivilent to your average pentium 2, they can't hold a candle to anything coming out of the united states. This chip may work for webstation-type things, but it will be useless for any real computing.

    1. Re:Yeah but... by psyconaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Define "real computing"...you'd be surprised how good these chips would be for embedded use.

      Also how much horsepower do you really think you need to for basic email, web, word processing and accounts use? Remember: a lot of people used to run their entire businesses on IBM XTs!

      -psy

    2. Re:Yeah but... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only problem is that these "dragon chips" are about equivilent to your average pentium 2

      Confucious say, he who would walk far must still take first step.

      Besides, experience with a P2 equivalent is a lot better than nothing when trying to design a P4 killer - not to mention the fact that Linux can quite comfortably be tailored to run on a 500mhz machine - Open Office might be a bit painful, but AbiWord will fly.

      --
      Beep beep.
    3. Re:Yeah but... by tuxlove · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only problem is that these "dragon chips" are about equivilent to your average pentium 2, they can't hold a candle to anything coming out of the united states.

      For now, that is. China has massive potential, and some day in the not too distant future the US CPU industry could be eating their dust. This event is not to be shrugged off lightly. It should be viewed as a call to arms by US chip developers. If they instead fall asleep at the wheel, things could end up quite ugly for them.

      I am talking about raw performance here, BTW. The Chinese could some day produce chips that are faster than chips designed by the US. But that's not necessarily what's required for the Chinese to win. If they produce a chip with a very compelling price/performance ratio, that could also have a dramatic effect. Imagine a CPU with, as a theoretical example, half the speed of a top of the line Intel CPU, but for one tenth the price. The war might well be lost simply on this basis.

    4. Re:Yeah but... by cmacb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "For now, that is. China has massive potential, and some day in the not too distant future the US CPU industry could be eating their dust. This event is not to be shrugged off lightly. It should be viewed as a call to arms by US chip developers. If they instead fall asleep at the wheel, things could end up quite ugly for them."

      Finally! After 200 off topic left vs right messages someone gets the bigger picture.

      Two more things that make this more than just another AMD nuisance for Intel. The Chinese will be integrating these into complete PCs by the millions, and their target will be lower price machines, not faster ones. Intel can wear AMD down in the race to make chips both faster and at a (relatively) lower cost, the final consumer machine based on these things will be phenomenally cheap.

      Will American consumers turn down complete PCs for $100 or so just because they don't say "Intel Inside"? I don't think so.

      If we want to keep any part of the PC hardware industry here in the US we had better start thinking more about cost. The end-user PC should be a dirt cheap device by now. Make bigger margins on servers, no problem, but for the end user, a toaster sized box with little or nothing left to add for $100 or so is all you need. Of course there is still one outrageously priced component of the typical end-user PC that I haven't mentioned that is going to have to drastically change (hint: not the monitor either).

      The other interesting questions is: What will these machines do to the DRM concept if they are readily available world-wide? Lets see, should I get the expensive DRM limited machine with the bloated operating system, or should I "settle" for this cheap import with the slick new operating system and no limits on what I can do? Decisions, decisions...

  10. All I can say is "meh". by radiumhahn · · Score: 4, Funny
    I have the strange desire to steal the technology and sell it for pennies on the dollar in the US

    Is turnaround still fairplay?

  11. t minus... by the_real_tigga · · Score: 2, Funny

    Commencing countdown to first occurrence of lame "Double Dragon"(TM) joke in reference to SMP setups.

    --
    my .sig is better than yours.
  12. Re:I wonder... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, as a quick look at the website would have told you, Mr.First Post.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  13. Good news! by psyconaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is actually pretty significant...and kudos to the Chinese for making it happen.

    About the only mainstream chip that I can think of off the top-of-my-head that's not U.S. bred is the ARM (which is British in origin). (I'm sure there are others, but you get my point).

    And for all of you who say "this chip has lame performance", think back 5-10 years. If you had something like this 10 years ago, you'd pee your pants. This is like going from 0-100Kmh for the Chinese....many don't have any computing resources....chips like these will start to make things accessible for many (although not all).

    Also remember back in 1986 when your relative who had a computer did all his accounts on an IBM XT? You don't need gobs of computing power to do basic business functions...and remember the majority of businesses *anywhere* are small businesses with less than 10 employees.

    Technology is also quite often culturally imbred....ever looked at how many consumer electronics devices are HUGE in Japan, but don't take off in the U.S.? It's that embedded cultural technology difference....and maybe with China having some homegrown options, they can develop systems that better meet the needs of their population.

    Anyhoo, just my two cents. :-)

    -psy

    1. Re:Good news! by shibashaba · · Score: 2, Informative

      Via c3 from taiwan. before that they were doing cyrix even though it was made by ibm.

      --
      ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
  14. But wouldn't you say its a good start? by gotr00t · · Score: 3, Informative
    Also remember that there is more riding on the sucess of this chip than its speed. China is trying to decrease its reliance on foreign technologies, and has been all along, which explains the huge amounts of revenue that have gone into the research for a better fighter plane when they could have purchased some Soviet MiGs all along.

    This nation has never before manufactured a computer processor of this power before, and even though processors from the US could easily beat it, its still a good bargain for the users and a good start for the country. Moreover, not everybody is a gamer, and sometimes, older processors do fine for everyday work tasks. For example, I have seen a lot of server boxes that still use Pentium II class processors and work fine. I still sometimes use my P II desktop, which uses SuSE Linux 7.3, and I think that its just about as fast as my Athlon 1700 when it comes to word processing and simple GUI tasks.

  15. My random observation by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I spent a good deal of time in China a couple of years back. All I have to say is, the many people whom I met all over the country were honest and worked very hard, and I think that they deserve better living conditions than they currently have.

    Their government is slowly but surely making progress towards a more reasonable form, and I hope that news technology developments like this are harbingers of improvement in their economy and the lives of the Chinese people in general.

    1. Re:My random observation by anagama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One other thing, 100 years ago, America was practically 3rd world in terms of labor conditions. There were labor riots, slave labor conditions, factories that burned down with the workers inside (fire escapes doors locked to prevent the workers from sneaking off), etc. etc. As economic prosperity increased, workers took it on themselves to see they got a share. We aren't talking about converting to communism (though certainly there were red groups), we're talking about fair labor standards, 40 hour work weeks, overtime laws etc. etc.

      Also interesting, is that even though America started out as a handful of colonies - think plantations, export of raw materials on the cheap, cheap manufacturing (3d world style) - it eventually built itself into a first world economy. And interestingly, England's economy has remained first world all along. Truth is, a strong economy in the US, or Australia, or any other of England's colonies has not destroyed it at all.

      In other words, if living/working conditions improve in China - it won't drive us back into the 3d world. In fact, the greatest hope for peace really is a rising standard of living in China. The majority of wealthy nations have relatively open governments and significant amounts of freedom for their citizens. This type of stability is bought only through the existance of a significant middle class. Desperate and impoverished people are far less likely to be peacable. Relatively well off people usually refuse to tolerate highly oppressive governments. This chip will be good for China, and for everyone else in many direct and indirect ways.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  16. Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like there'll be an alternative when all Intel and AMD are producing are Palladium chipsets and you'd rather not be "trusted" by Big Corps...

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  17. Re:Excellent value for the price! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hook.
    Line.
    Sinker.

    I can't believe this was modded to 4, Informative.

    Congrats to the AC!

  18. Why should US trade by these rules? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful


    If the Chinese government can go around propping up Chinese industries until American businesses get torched and American workers get laid off, then why do it?

    I mean, what's the point of being the only nation in town that believes in free trade when everyone else, including American importers, are using it to crush Americans at home.

    F---- free trade.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by AceM2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Defense spending is not exactly typical regional business.. You could have at least used a better example ;P

    2. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Tomble · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Sorry, but I can't stand back from this. You may or may not be a troll, I believe you're not. Either way, sod it, I'm biting:
      F---- free trade.
      I can certainly empathise with that sentiment- all free trade really gives the world is unnaturally cheap goods; Cheap stuff is great, but what's the point if next-to noone can afford them (due to all the jobs going to slave owners and sweat-shops), and/or we all effectively become slaves ourselves? One or the other of these will naturally be the eventual outcome.

      But,

      I mean, what's the point of being the only nation in town that believes in free trade
      Unless I somehow misunderstood who you meant, you are in fact, saying that America believes in free trade.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Wait a moment, that actually isn't funny. Certainly not to the countries that ROT due to American (and yes, European too, I'll freely admit) double-standards on the free trade thing. America does sort of believe in free trade, but only when it serves its own interests. Otherwise, America believes America First. Policy speaks louder than words here, I'm afraid.

      The best solution is for everybody to agree quite clearly, that unfettered free trade is a fucking stupid idea, and that NOBODY should be forced to submit themselves to free trade agreements in the way that many 3rd world countries have been forced to before they were allowed vital foreign aid.

      --
      Be careful! New moon tonight.
    3. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by gotan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US is aggressiveley pursuing their own economical benefits. Organisations like WTO try (and in most cases succeed) to dictate how to do trade, and these "free market" rules greatly benefit US-corporations or more generally "global players". Other governments are cajoled by any means to accept rules set forth bye those global players, but those rules are not about fair trade, they are about unregulated trade. OTOH when it comes to IP the US propagate a very rigid system that only serves to maintain the status quo. One of the most ridiculous examples of this is patenting rice genes and selling rice seeds for breeds that before said patenting were free to everyone. The patent system is actually a very good example: Why should other countries accept US-IP-laws when they only serve to hamper their own economy and drain loads of money from those countries into the pockets of US-corporations. Japan did very well ignoring those IP-laws and getting their economy up, and the US of A ignored IP-laws too when it was convenient.

      So why should a country like China play by a set of rules that have mostly negative effects on their economy, and why shouldn't a country be allowed to boost their own economy? People seem to have forgotten that the job of a government is to care for their people, not for the welfare of multinational corporations.

      What i said here about the USA holds true for most "rich" capitalistic countries and is more the doing of huge corporations than of any specific country, but the US also leverage their economical power to put pressure on other countries by means of embargoes or cutting development aids. And last but not least President Bush messing with the Microsoft trial to get one of the largest US-corporations out of their legal troubles scot-free is another very fine example of protectionism.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  19. Isn't this... by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...the chip Dvorak said was rumored to be like slower than a 486 chip? The one that was total crap but the Chinese government was all happy about it since they had control over it?

    Reminds me of the line: "If you had let the government come up with the cure to Polio, you'd have the best iron lung in the world but you'd be no closer to a vaccine."

  20. Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibetans by reporter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    For a country that is as backward as mainland China, possessing the ability to make a high-performance 32-bit pipelined microprocessor is a tad surprising. However, when you think of the intimate relationship between Taiwan and mainland China, you realize that the technology for the Dragon microprocessor came from Taiwan. So, things are not that surprising.

    Consider the following.

    1. The constitution of the Chinese living in Taiwan supports the integration of both Tibet and Mongolia into mainland China. While Tibetans suffer and die at the hands of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, the Chinese in Taiwan support integrating Tibet into "One China".
    2. The Chinese son of the chairman of a powerful conglomerate in Taiwan has joined with the son of Jiang Zemin, the butcher of Tibet, to build an advanced silicon-wafer factory in Shanghai. (reference: "Sons of prominent Chinese team up on chip venture")
    3. Senior Chinese military officials retired from the Taiwanese military have gone to mainland China and given military secrets about the American F-16 fighter jet to the Beijing government. (reference: "Military secrets on sale to China")
    4. The Wall Street Journal reports that the majority of American spies who steal sensitive computer and military technology (like microprocessor blueprints) to give to mainland China are actually born and raised in Taiwan. Both spies mentioned in "Two Men Arrested for Planning to Smuggle High-Tech Encryption Devices to China" are born and raised in Taiwan.

    In other words, we Americans should blame ourselves. Why? American companies, especially those in Silicon Valley, employ hordes of Chinese from Taiwan. When they are given lucrative opportunities in mainland China, they will seize those opportunities. Some of those opportunities involve giving sensitive American technology to Beijing. We did this to ourselves; we made it easy for the Taiwanese to give American technology to Beijing.

    This hemorrhaging of technology will continue until we in the United States of America (USA) wake up. We should treat Taiwan as a province of China. When we slap punitive sanctions against China, we should also apply those sanctions against Taiwan. If we do not want to give sensitive technology to China, then we should not give sensitive technology to Taiwan. Period.

    Several companies in Silicon Valley prohibit Chinese nationals from working on technologies deemed sensitive by the American government. Yet, those very same companies readily employ Taiwanese nationals to work on the same sensitive technologies. Folks, let's wake up before the fire-breathing dragon burns us Americans along with the Tibetans.

  21. Nice SoC design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    V-Dragon is an embedded chip, it has an integrated memory controller (supporting 1GB of SDRAM), USB controller, 10/100Mbps Ethernet and PCI controller. Since everything you need is integrated on the CPU, it makes motherboards very simple.

    It won't be very fast, but it should be more than enoug for web-browsing and text-editing.

  22. slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    you do realise that slashdotting a chinese national website is a capital crime in mainland china, don't you?

  23. Well- by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one would like to welcome our new Chinese overlords...

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  24. But... by dracvl · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...will it run my Dragon32 code?

  25. Yet Another Chinese "Opportunity" Evaporates by istartedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is part of a trend. Everybody thought China would be this wide open market. All these people were salivating at the prospect of a billion customers. They all forgot that China is so big that they are likely to muster the ability to do it themselves. The same thing has already happened with cell phones.

    This also reminds me of a conversation I had in the early 90s with a room-mate who was an avid Free Trader. Me: "Why are we compromising our principles with China. We don't need them". Him: "We don't need them? They don't need us!". Me: "That's loser talk!". Him: "You're hopelessly backward and provincial...".

    In retrospect, we were probably both right; at least on the first exchange. We don't need China. They don't need us. Sheesh! Why is Slashdot such a dog lately. It won't let me preview posts...

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  26. EETimes article by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    EETimes has an article on this. They note:

    Culturecom Holdings Ltd., a publisher of Chinese language "fighting" comics that migrated into information technology in the 1990s, has begun selling its V-Dragon microprocessor for use in Chinese PCs.

    That's almost like vivendi-universal going from a water utility to a multimedia giant! Is there some new business strategy for totally changing industries that I should be aware of?

    They also note:

    The V-Dragon CPU incorporates support for Chinese-language characters, according to the company.

    Wow, I wonder what that means... optimized U16 support? Or is it marketing-speak?

    EEtimes also notes that 300,000 chips have already been sold or have letters of intent to be sold.

    1. Re:EETimes article by Jonavin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like it's got some built-in character generator.

      Able to generate more than 32,000 (extensible to > 50,000)Traditional and Simplified Chinese characters and sizes ranging from 11 x 11 to 127 x 127 pixels
      Capable of generating 3 different kinds of font types (Ming, Black, Round)

      Less processing power is required than for solutions using TrueType fonts

      Less memory is required than for solutions using pre-composed bitmap fonts

  27. "In line with the Chinese government's IT policy" by rocky28 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did anybody else here read the article?

    Did this line send shivers down your spine?

    While I applaud the effort to give cheap computing to the underpriviliged masses in China, this may be cause for concern

    The fact that a government that still seems to be fairly interested in tramping on all forms of dissidence is involved enough with the OS and hardware so that it falls "in line with the Chinese government's IT policy", makes me a little nervous.

    This isn't unusual, MS has always tailored their products so that they fit in with the IT policies of western nations. But from what I have read, China has a somewhat different IT policy to many Western nations.

    An IT policy which drives everything underground, away from the policing ears.

  28. If they don't start a WAR with Taiwan. Maybe. by bobo333 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I would hope some of you can read this before Slashdot Censors mod this down to Flamebait.

    China is a ruthless communist dictatorship. They don't believe in bilateral trade. They are a parasitic trading country like alot of the ASIAN nations. They lure stupid American companies in the belief that with the lure of dirt cheap labor they will hit the gold mine. They forget that China is making moves to conquer another asian country . Also know that most of Chinese wealth can be attributed to allowing the brutal dictatorship free access to American markets while doing very little reciprical trade with the U.S. Why do we free trade with CHina and not Cuba or North Korea since they are all alike ?

  29. Maybe we need slower, cheaper alternatives... by globalar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There seems a constant rush to dump current consumer chips and move on to something faster (like Moore's Law needs to be held up). This does not represent the needs of mass consumers - it represents the interests of corporations who want cash to keep winding the cycle upwards for greater and continued profit.

    There is nothing wrong with a chip that does not compete with the latest specs. So many people believe that they need stellar specs - they need reliable, cost-effective chips that do their math.

  30. Re:Dragons /.'d Already by sniggly · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think you'll have to look at something like a 400mhz celeron or pentium 2 for comparison. Price hence will be very very low. Midori is an excellent distribution, less demanding even than redhat 6.2 so if you run icewm on it you'll have a very good speed.

    People don't need much, we use office / openoffice because everyone else does. In China they can do their own thing with less bloated simple tools. Like a spruced up xedit. Such a system wont need more than a 10gb harddisk if even that.

    Will be interesting to see what they pick as a browser and email client.

    Ballpark guess at cost would be between $125 and $175 (w/o monitor). Depending on memory, drives, multimedia, etc.

    --
    Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  31. You're missing the point. by RatBastard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are completely missing the point. The Chinese are not trying to make an Intell/AMD Killer. They are making a CPU with enough horsepower to run Linux and let people do office tasks - email, word processing, spreadsheets, etc... and other normal computing tasks. They are also making a CPU in-house, which means they don't need to worry about how Intel or AMD feels about them or even if the US government doesn't want them buying powerful chips.

    This isan't about playing DOOM3 or Half-Life2. This is about China having an IT sector that is not subject to the whims of non-Chinese companies or governments.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  32. Character generator? by pesc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As I am interested in CPU architecture, I tried to find some technical info on the chip. I didn't found much, except a large powerpoint file which I failed to download. Slashdot effect? I wonder if they can read/produce such .ppt files under their Midori Linux ;-)

    However, there is much more talk about their embedded character generator! This sounded very funny to me. A character generator in a CPU??!?!

    After browsing around, I found that the vice president of Culturecom has been working 20 years with chinese character encodings. I guess the board of directors has a lot to say about what the chip real estate should be used for ;-)

    I also found this link explaining somewhat more. (Is it normal practice for UCLA to comment on market opportunities for Chinese companies in scientific papers?)

    Anyway, Culturecom seems to have invented an encoding for chinese characters that encodes brush strokes. This seems to be a good idea, and is likely superior to the outline encoding used in TrueType. It is probably a nice algorithm. But they don't seem to want to publish this algorithm. The idea is to "embed" it in a chip, and sell the chips instead. ($25) Maybe this makes sense in china where patents and copyrights are routinely violated, but I personally think that the chip real estate could probably have a better use.

    Speaking of copyright violations; their web site says that they are selling Midori Linux for only $50. I wonder if that includes source code and a GPL license?

    --

    )9TSS
  33. let see by Dumbush · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I changes the wording a bit here, would it still make sense?

    the flagrant abuses of some South American countries that US has perpetrated since the 1950s are inexcusable. The fact that US is even allowed NEAR the United Nations is a gross mockery of justice.

    I know I'm evangelizing here, but people need to know that the wealthiset nation in the world is consider by many as more brutal and inhuman than Saddam Hussein's.

  34. Sure, sure by roystgnr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, if there's one country we can count on to resist pressure to place their population's property under a system enforcing centralized control, it's China!

  35. [M]architecture? by leandrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The title says it all. Any real info about what's the architecture (as in, is it x86, MIPS, SPARC, POWER, E2K?...), and how will it be marketed (clones vs proprietary, embedded vs general purpose, etc)?

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  36. China's Record Bad Enough - Re:Sure i'll buy one by SpikeSpiff · · Score: 2, Informative
    China's human rights record is spectacularly bad, on its own merits. Tibet is small potatoes.

    Tibet is pretty, and it has many movie stars. So people worry about Tibet.

    30 MILLION people died in China during the "great leap forward" and "cultural revolution" because of politically motivated starvation and executions. That's more than the population of Tibet. In fact, it ranks as one of the great tradgedies of human history, with the black plague, AIDs, WWI, and WWII.

    Tiannenmen. And friends like North Korea, Cambodia, and Vietnam.

    --
    "All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
  37. As the poster... by mrseigen · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have to say I made a boo-boo. The article in question actually tells that the processor is available for direct order, not pre-order as I had let on. Not like it stopped anyone who cared.

    (First submission! w00t!)

  38. Re:Dragons /.'d Already by EinarH · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The last time this was up on slashdot someone mentioned performance equivalent to a Intel P2 450 MHz. Since this is a RISC CPU it will of course be stronger in diffrent areas but that is another discussion.

    But the real kicker with this CPU is the possibility for cheap dual and quad motherboards. If you can get 4 of these running under Linux or NetBSD the performance of one CPU don't mather that much. With a cost per CPU probably between $20-30* I would be all over tis offer.
    From a customers wiewpoint competition in the Quad-motherboard is appreciated as these MB's today cost insane amounts of money.

    All this depends on wheter they have added propper SMP support which is propably difficalt as they try to stay away of "IP" issues.

    *Wild guess of course, but they just can't cost above $30 if they expect them to sell in China.

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  39. Hypocrisy: IT industy is soaking in it by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The self righteous crowd got let out of its cage today. Lets address some concerns:

    Humanitarianism:

    The computer you're typing youre typing on was most likely made in a place you would describe as a horrible sweatshop if you would ever get to see it. Same goes for all sorts of computer related goods.

    Lots of goods in general are clearly marked Made in China yet its this chip some people seem so focused on.

    Also, please take into account the US and its own allies record on human rights before entering the morally ambigious grounds of "Bad country vs. Good country."

    Propping up the industry

    All countries do this. Corporate welfare, sweetheart deals, tariffs, etc. Look in your own backyard before you accuse the neighbors of being a nuscience.

    "Its only a pentium II"

    Lets see the PII burns very little energy, had almost 10 million transistors and 64 gigabytes of addressable memory. Not a bad chip to be compared to. I used to run Mandrake on a PII-350 and it would play Divx movies without a frame skip. We're not talking a 8086 chip here.

    I'm not even going to go into how no one really needs a P4 at 2ghz to run Office and all the energy that wastes.

    "Tibet!"

    Whatever your thoughts on Tibet buying not not buying a Dragon chip will make no difference. Its like people refusing to drink French wine because of their position regarding Iraq. The French will not notice or care.

    Also, Tibet was a theocratic slave state with no concept of civil rights either. Pot meet Kettle.

    "China Bad, must punish."

    Maybe not. By entering into normal trade relations we make their economy dependent on the world economy, i.e. it becomes a political check, do bad things, watch your economy collapse through sanctions. I'm no lassieze-faire globalisation nutcase, but this certainly beats isolationism by a wide margin. Business doesnt exist in a vacuum, there have been cultural exchanges for quite some time and I would rather see a positive bend on westernism than trans-atlantic namecalling and useless boycotts.

    I'm an idealist too, but I know that I have bigger problems domestically and if I want to impose my view of the world onto other countries I'd rather be able to point to my backyard and say "this is how its done" as opposed to "you are bad, go away."

  40. Re:Mod parent back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    China is a totalitarian, aggresive, expansionist, military power.

    WTF? CHINA is an aggresive (sic) expansionist military power? WTF? Are you on fucking crack? Or do you not understand what the word hypocrite means? The United States has military bases in Antarctica, Antigua and Barbuda, Austrailia, the Bahamas, Bahrain, Belgium, British Indian Ocean Territories, Canada, Columbia, Cuba, Denmark, Egypt, France (yes, France), Germany, Germany, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Honduras, Hong Kong, Iceland, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Kwajalein Atoll, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Peru, Portgual, Saint Helena, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and Venezuela. But yeah, China is an aggresive (sic) expansionist military power. What the fuck ever. Get your head out of your ass, fucktard.

    "I wonder why those dumb ass Chinese spend so much on defense. Must be plotting to take over the world or sumfin. I'm gonna get me another Coors Light and watch me some Fox News."

    You fucking moron.

    We don't, for example, worry so much about technology in the hands of the peaceful democratic country of South Korea.

    The peaceful democratic country with 100 (count them, I would have listed them too if I wasn't so damn lazy) US military bases and 37,000 US soldiers. Gee, I wonder why we don't worry as much about technology there. It's a mystery. Please enlighten me Mr. Internet Genius Geek Boy.

  41. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by andrewski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For a country that is as backward as mainland China, possessing the ability to make a high-performance 32-bit pipelined microprocessor is a tad surprising.

    Hardly. You don't think that the Chinese know everything about the workings of CPU and RAM foundries in Taiwan? You realize that Taiwan is where much of our computer gear is manufactured.

    Whether you agree with the policies of the Chinese government, you must realize that China is one of the oldest civilizations in the whole world. America doesn't have exclusive rights to computing you know. Maybe they are tired of watching American companies flop around like beached salmon and want sustainable computing for themselves.

    Besides, the chip implements technology published as a standard. How could you call this stealing?

  42. misinterpretation by boarder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, you misread his misspelling... he meant to say:

    "...which was killing millions of Americans through puberty"

    It's a hard stage in life, but regardly of Bush's policies we all have to pass through it. Some may not live to gain from it, but I believe puberty only makes us a stronger country.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  43. Re:Mod parent back up by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is factually incorrect. The US (unsuccessfully) invaded Cuba in 1961. Much more recently we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. Every successful empire needs to expand in order to keep the plebians from revolting, and the US is no exception.

  44. Re:Mod parent back up by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

    Which of those three nations did we establish a colony in? Maybe you have a different defintion of expand than I do. China certainly does.

  45. Re:Mod parent back up by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

    To your first point: Norway is not in strategic competition with China, nor will it ever be. We are.

    To your second: I am aware that America stopped expanding for geographical reasons. That does not change the fact that the period of American expansion is over. Moreover, your point about Chinese empire is completely false. The simple act of being conquered by the Mongols does not give you the right to take over the entire Mongol empire. And do you feel that Japan has the right to take over China anytime it wants simply because it once made China part of its empire? That sort of reasoning is asinine. I do hear it often, however -- it's a product of indoctrination by the Chinese educational system. They're good at it. They are better than most anybody at fooling their own people with bold faced lies, I'd have to say.

    And as for your third point about the Vietnamese: We left despite the South Vietnamese asking us to stay. Which is why they were shortly thereafter overthrown by the communists. Do you remember the thing called the Vietnam war? Remember how we left at the end and abandoned the South Vietnamese? Perhaps you need some remedial history. You certainly need a lesson in civility. It would make you seem like less of an ass whenever you open your mouth and reveal your ignorance about history.

  46. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by den_erpel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You raise some valid points, but you need to come off your high horse. Back in the time when the USA was, what you call, a backward country, the US was all so pleased to get Fermi, Einstein fleeing totalitarian regimes in Europe (to name just a few). They did not come to their theories and research in isolation, but were a product of their environment and education in those countries. But they started or helped a developing industry and research in the US.

    Later, the US even incited top leading researchers to go to the States, well in many cases, they had little choice, but it was better than being deported by the USSR.

    In short, this has happened before (and was done by those that had little to protect or complain about, but are now the first to be scorned), and is happening again. Nothing new here, move along.

    In times of world Economy, I am still dazzled to see that ppl seem to find reasons to protect their little countries (in fact, the country they are in can do anything they want, but everyone else should be good, unfair competition anyone?). I am just glad to see another alternative processor and in the long term, it can only benefit us with lower prices and better performance.

    --
    Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
  47. Are you sure they're not running Midori in RAMDisk by ahfoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I got the impression that the whole distro is loaded into RAMDisk from a flash.
    This really caught my eye because just recently on the Knoppix boards, a script has come out to load a whole Knoppix distro directly into RAMDisk.
    I bet this is how it works and I think it's an awesome way to go. I want to try and load Morphix into 300 Megs of RAM using the script over at Knoppix. You could try it too! They say it's freakin' fast once you load everything into RAM.
    I think it's interesting that the other popular desktops, MS and Apple, really don't have any incentive to go this way since it could potentially stall high end hardware sales and that's not really in their business interests.
    After all, why do you need a bunch of hard drives if your OS is in RAM and you have cheap optical media for storage. And why do you need fast CPUs if your OS is already snappy as hell on an older --or newer, but slower, cheaper and less power hungry-- machines.
    I think this is huge news. I knew it was coming, but I thought it would be awhile. I think the immersion lithography deal made it pointless to put things off anymore. The tech transfer is complete and it had jack to do with Taiwan. The Taiwanese are far too greedy. This was home grown all the way. I have no doubt.

  48. Just had to troll! =) by shaggie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. The simple act of being kicked out of Europe does not give you the right to take over the New World from the Natives.. BUT YOU DID!! and forced them into reservations for their own protection... =) (I'm not saying that is wrong either.. its a basic law of science by some dude they call darwin.. survival of the fittest or some crud)

    2. If you go back 5000 years, what is now known as China was actually many separate kingdoms, bout 8 or 9 and yes today's Tibet belonged to one of those kingdoms and the land of Tibet over the last 5000 years have been off and on, in and out of "China's" control. Some uprising here and there changes possession of control throughout the years. Look at the greeks, romans, normans, franks, etc.. they all did the same shit, so why is it that when China does it, China is the evil empire and when the europeans does it, its A-OK.

    China's autocratic regime does have its drawbacks, but then again it does have its usefulness. Many critics of the system based their assessment on the assumptions of their own environment and did not take into account the cultural, economical, educational differences.

    There are some ideas which we deem extremely previous which runs counters against other cultures and we think people who do not adopt what we deem precious is EVIL...(pinky to the lips!). Democracy is a system that can only work when education, cultural, and economic standards are of a level that can sustain a democratic system. Every other country that has tried to implement a democractic system that has not achieve a certain threshold in these categories have failed miserably. Taiwan, Russia, Japan, Indonesia, etc.. list goes on and on.

    3. The US government isn't good at fooling their own people with bold faced lies? Please google Bushism, it provides a good read to counter your arguments =). Not to mention that we are known for buying political, military and economical favors with our "AID" packages. recent examples.. turkey, pakistan, et al. let us use your land as base for our iraq campaign and we promise give you X billion (in fine print but we will have to get congressional approval in addition to the presidential promise, so the AID package MIGHT not be there). So we just package our lies a little better but what's the difference?

    4. Regarding vietnam, my understanding was due to political and social reasons, the government never commited enough military support to make the war winnable, all the hippie protests (really just an excuse to say FUCK over a PA system a lot, get alot of people in one place to have free casual sex and complain at the government imo), the morale issue of the soldiers there where it seems that most of them don't know why the fuck are they doing in the jungles of vietnam. The US finally left because it became too economically, and politically unsustainable for them to continue in vietnam. Thus vietnam became the only war in modern history that the US technically lost, now if the US actually focused the entire might of its military powers in vietnam, there won't be tributes to uncle ho in vietnam right now. There'll be an american flag there instead.

    5. Based on what I have read of ancient and modern historical text (last 4500 years) Other than wars within the area in what is known as China today, the "Chinese" has never actually invaded another country. (Parts of North Korea was actually part of China off and on over history). The japanese and korean kingdoms also deferred to the decisions of the chinese emperors and used the chinese emperors as leverage politically in their own kingdoms. You can find references to that in many of the historical accounts.

    China has also never engaged in colonialism even though they had more than enough power militarily to do so in the past. In the Ming dynasty, a fleet that contained over 100 ships set sail under the command of Admiral Cheng Ho. He visited many places and iirc went all the way to Africa. Whenever he arrived at a new place, instead of setting up colonies, he did a PR camp

  49. China by hackus · · Score: 2

    And so it begins...

    China has made a few things clear with respect to its rise as a new super power:

    1) We will show the world what can be done and take the lead as a nation in engineering, space exploration, and computer science.

    They started with the largest engineering project ever concieved..the largest hydro electric power project EVER.

    No western nation could duplicate such a project even if we wanted to because of the sheer size, and the use of cheap labor by the Chinese.

    China will have clean, cheap energy for 25% of the nations total needs for the next 100 years from this project.

    2) It has been rumored, recently in a M5 visit to China, that space exploration plans include a moon base within 15 years of thier first successful manned orbital launch.

    It was also made in not so many words, that once they complete this base, we are NOT welcome.

    3) China, doesn't want Western IT technology. Especially Windows, or Intel's chip technology in any sort of influence on its internal consumer markets.

    It was made clear that Intel's Chip ID technology and the CIA's insistence that back doors be placed into foreign copies of Windows, was not acceptable.

    It is forbidden in China to attach any Intel processor based system to the internet with Chip ID technology of anykind.

    This new processor was a "call your bluff".

    After all, HOW DARE YOU compete with Western technology, you can't possible build anything near as well as we can, so you must accept our processors if you want to do business with us.

    It is this direct response to Intel's Digital Rights, chip ID technology as well, that this processor now has been born.

    It won't take China long to ramp this processor up to Pentium 4 Xeon quality (3 years at most), using Tainwanese acquired fabrication planets and technologists.

    In my view, China can sustain its economic growth internally, due to its population size for the next 50 years, and tell the rest of the world to kiss its ass.

    I believe greed, our very own Intellectual Property Rights Laws, and this obsession with Digital Rights Management has locked us out of the only market that will provide long term economic security to the United States.

    What is more, I believe China is using these laws against our very own interests in doing business over there.

    Coupled with thier own version of RedFlag Linux, once China has its own PC, and own Operating System, THEY WILL DICTATE TERMS 50 years from now to the Western world.

    Our business leaders are fools in this country, and while China builds the biggest terrestrial project ever concieved, builds its own Moon Base 20 years from now, the world will do everything it can not to make the Dragon DISPLEASED.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  50. That's the Future by wFruitbat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool,

    Now they can have an opcode that will very quickly load the string "Long Live Chineese Socialist Party" in the video memory.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=free+chinese+lang ua ge+course