OSDL Position Paper on SCO and Linux
cshabazian writes "The OSDL has released a position paper raising serious questions about SCO Group's threatened litigation against end users of Linux. The position paper, which casts doubt on SCO's position, was authored by one of the world's leading legal experts on copyright law as applied to software, Professor Eben Moglen of Columbia University."
The ODSL has released a position paper...
I'm really glad to see the Old Dominion Soccer League (ODSL) taking a kick at this. Hopefully they'll have the balls hang tough with SCO and score one for Linux lovers everywhere!
Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
So basically all they did was smarten up a few thousand /. comments and put it into a PDF? so buissness plan for them is.
1: read /. comments
2: insert good grammer and spelling
3: mash them all together
4: release as pdf
5: ???
6: Profit!!!
"For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
Wow! He actually casts doubt on SCO's claims! That must have taken a legal genius! Certainly something none of the nerds on
"Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney
I was working for several years at SCO, and was the lead developer for their SMP module. Anyway, I was also good friends with Linus Torvalds at this time. Once I was working at home, and he came round to visit me. Anyway, when I got back to work, I noticed that my printer's paper tray was empty. I didn't think anything of it at the time, but I guess Linus must have printed off a copy of the code, and used that for Linux SMP support.
No idea why he didn't just ftp it to himself. I guess the guy never was too hot when it comes to computers.
SCO got stood up at the wedding (project monteray) and is now suing IBM's new bride Linux, cause she didn't get what was promised to her.
And now she wants to ruin everyone elses wedding, unless she gets a gift for her ruined wedding.
void complaint = NULL; sorry, it won't compile.
It's not reverse engineering.
It's about creating new products that are trade secrets owned by SCO. For example, JFS is a trade secret owned by SCO.
Yes, I known that SCO hasn't published anything like JFS, that's obviously why it's a secret.
Citing of broken Commandments? Public flogging? Are you the geek version of Jerry Falwell?
...tradition of dueling to solve disagreements? Sounds like a great way for lawyers who disagree to resolve disputes to me. Dontyathink?
Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
Why do you want those soccer moms and kids to get slashdotted?
This is probably because what those jocks did to you in high school, eh?
Forgive and forget, man.
Forgive and forget.
Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
Anyone else notice that the NasDaq Summary Quotes for SCOX nasdaq.com has a article link at the bottom called /K I L L K I L L K I L L -- The SCO Group/ ? I wonder if it works?