Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft to do for Usenet what it did for Email & The Web?
tjones2 writes "Seems like Microsoft isn't content with sad state of email these days. They now want to "make engaging with communities easier and friendlier". This means extending their reach into Usenet." Fortunately most of Usenet is such a cespool that really they can only make it better. And after cornering the market on email worms, imagine the benefits they can bring to NNTP!
Hmm, what could be the news group with the most activity? Let's search for groups with the word "pictures" in them and I'll bet we find out.
... I see you are browsing alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.hornyteens
Would you like:
* tissues
* baby oil
* a life
* or me to fuck off
?
I seriously doubt that even Microsoft can make the USENET spam problem worse than it already is.
I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.
Now, as a time-saving measure, right next to the "post reply" button, there will be a "Me Too" button, and a "Send me the link username@hotmail.com" button.
Ryan Fenton
Well, as a long time internet participant, I recall quite good what
.DOC rich text attached to an otherwise empty posting.
AOL did to usenet: Aquire a hord of "Me too" follow-up posters.
Actually, a quick google-groups research shows that of the 32,000
postings that contain "me too", a whopping 30,600 also contain the
word "AOL".
So I question - what can Microsoft do to usenet? I suspect, nothing
nice. Probably their efforts result in even more MIME/HTML postings,
with binaries attached in non-binary groups (probably something like
"My Signature.exe"). And certainly a lot of proprietarily encapsulated
text, such as
On one hand, usenet is for everyone, including Microsoft users. On
the other hand, I really hope that google-groups will filter them off
so that usenet can stay the valuable source of accurate tech information
that it is today.
Marc
They took over the market share with shabby products that allow spyware, viruses, cronic crashing, etc. Can't wait to have Usenet work as well!
At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
Check the stats for NANAE (news.admin.net-abuse.email) that get regularly posted. More than half is OE.
And just wait until your parents find out you can download PORN from Usenet!!! OH GOD NOOOO!!! THE END IS NEAR!!!
[/joke]
"To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking
What did microsoft do for email and the web?
s/for/to
Now the answer should be clear...
I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
true, but I'm sure the boys at Redmond are up to the challenge
Well isn't this just wonderful! It's not enough that usenet is plauged with spam, now we can have pop-up ads there, too!
:)
Someone let me know when the Mozilla team gets them blocked -- God bless them, every one.
That's a really awsome refutation of my statement. Can I subscribe to your newspaper?
This week, Microsoft invents the threaded news reader......
Embrace and extend, embrace and extend....
search for newsgroups containing "e":
/Static/default.asp, line 213
Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a0006'
Overflow: 'CInt'
Anyone using CInt for something like that is so utterly clueless that we'll have nothing to worry about.
Spot the secret MS MeSsage: Use(.)Net - the dot is silent.
Didn't you notice that, when you had to manually start windows from DOS, you had to type Win - its psychology, people.
Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
We could just switch back to UUCP and let Microsoft choke on that.
gcc: brain.c: No such file or directory
Me suspects that MS has covertly cornered the online adult entertainment industry. And I don't even want to think about how they plan to enforce compliance.
Oh no, a bottom poster. I've been on usenet longer than you, and have been top posting from the beginning. I wish you bottom posters would stop screwing with the most logical, the easiest, and above all the *fastest* way to read through a discussion.
Considering the number of OTDs (outlook transmitted diseases) that would be prevented if Microsoft would just shut off a lot of stuff by default, I can only wonder what new spams and worms will be spread more efficiently.
Oh yee of little faith...
you keep saying 'cesspool' like its a bad thing ???
> I downloaded all pictures sent to alt.binaries.pictures.eroica .
> I got nothing but pictures of bloody Beethoven.
Erocia -> Beethoven
Erotica -> Beat-Off-'n
"BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
What are they trying to do.. make downloading pirated material easier?
Actually, I imagine exactly the opposite. As RIAA actions, DRM, and etc snowball, all of the major methods of obtaining and sharing illegal content will eventually be targeted in some fashion. We've seen it already with Napster, we're probably seeing the beginnings of that with Kazaa. People who spend a good portion of the year behind a college/corporate networks' firewalls, like me, have probably seen it with other methods, too.
As it stands now, Usenet really looks to be a last refuge, should it come down to it. With years and years of reputation as a valid and legal exchange of information, it would be difficult for a provider to justify denying access to it. If/when other methods start getting targeted, a lot of people will end up on Usenet.
But! Microsoft is paving the way in DRM systems. Their eventual set-up can't have a gaping hole as large as all of Usenet, or they'll get reamed by headline after headline of "Latest MS Software available on Usenet within Hours of Release". Since Usenet is much more 'open' in the sense of protocols and such than a program developed by a single company or person, MS can work 'with' it in ways that wouldn't be appropriate with Kazaa, Bittorrent, etc.
So, maybe I'm a little to conspiracy theorist here, but it seems like this is just preparing for the eventual attack on Usenet as a source for illegal trading of files.
Hypocrites all! Old and forgotten as it is, USENET is still your only one-stop source for raunchy, tasteless, or just plain sick jpegs -- and you can't claim card-carrying-unreformable-degenerate status until you've spent at least a couple of weeks reading alt.sex.stories....
In all seriousness, when I read "Microsoft to do for Usenet what it did for Email & The Web", my first thought was: "Microsoft is making a newsreader that automatically executes code stored inside of Usenet posts?"
As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
See, there's these pigeons...
a world in progress...
Basicly all that has gone wrong with NNTP is the lack of accounts providing a NNTP server. Linux will be back in a flash. Microsoft does already support usenet what is new. Outlook express does it yep nice way to infect 1000 people quickly so NNTP server disappeared because of microsoft so fix the faults and it will be back.
they had better [effing] leave 'html' and 'rich text' out of their news reader
.doc formatting instead. :-(
Good News: They probably will.
Bad News: They will probably push MS Word
This has been information from out of my ass. Thank you.