Slashdot Mirror


Phone or Tracking Device?

Red Wolf writes "The first major commercial service that traces people's locations using their mobile phones -- mapAmobile -- is designed more to ease the minds of worried parents and suspicious bosses than to enable unauthorised spying."

12 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. In the name of security by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The provider said safeguards were in place to protect civil liberties."

    That's how it always starts. As more and more companies use it, and when corporations finally control it, those safeguards will slowly be peeled away in the name of security and efficiency - by then it will be so common that most of us probably won't even notice the loss of privacy at all, and others will even encourage it in order to help catch criminals.

    FP

  2. no thanks... by garcia · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am more worried about the 2005 law that requires GPS/triangulation in all cell phones for 911 call locating. Here's a link to an article in Popular Science about China and how people were using their cell phones to find out which buildings were infected with SARS.

    People play a game where you "kill" a nearby person after you locate them using your cell phone equipped with GPS. Just what I want, ANYONE to be able to locate me on the street (opt-in service or not isn't my point).

    The first major wave of location services could beam to the U.S. as early as Christmas, when 44 percent of the nation's 149.2 million cellphone subscribers are expected to be traceable, according to the research firm In-Stat/MDR.

    No thanks, I would prefer to die after placing a call to 911 rather than have whoever decide that they want to track me via GPS/triangulation.

    Live free or die.

    Just my worthless .02

    1. Re:no thanks... by Planesdragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about I leave the house and drive down the road at 91mph because I feel like it and the police track me going 91, wait for me ahead, and pull me over?

      That's what I am worried about.


      God, I'm not worried about that. You might as well bitch about radar detectors. (Speed Limits, while a tad bit low, are a good idea. You going at 91 anywhere but a nearly-empty highway is reckless endangerment--and in NYS, it'll [rightly] get you tossed in jail.)

      Anyway...

      If you're going to worry about tracking, worry about inaccuracy and corruption. Worry about psychotic ex-boyfriends hacking the system and coming after you. Worry about being politically opporessed. And after you worry, figure out an effective check on the darn thing. (A local log of who pings for your location would solve the first; standard checks against corruption would help against the second.)

  3. Worse than Orwellian!! by dtolton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find the wording of the press release ironic.

    <paraphrase>
    This device isn't really for spying, it's more to allow parents to spy
    on their children, and employers to spy on their employees.
    </paraphrase>

    They of course fail to mention that if the technology were available, a judge
    could easily grant a warrant to allow authorities to observe your
    movements without notifying you.

    In many ways this is worse than Orwellian, because at least in
    Orwell's vision, you could still hide from the cameras or escape to
    places that didn't have cameras on them. With this device if you had
    it on (assuming it works as well as they claim (doubtful)) they could
    pinpoint your location all the time. I guess you could just leave it
    in your office while you went to play that round of golf and say you
    were in a meeting. ;)

    Still this technology is simply a herald of more instrusive technology
    to come. Move over Orwell, the future may be worse than you imagined.
    As someone said in an earlier story, doubleplusungood.

    --

    Doug Tolton

    "The destruction of a value which is, will not bring value to that which isn't." -John Galt
    1. Re:Worse than Orwellian!! by dtolton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " It's not orwellian, it's not even close.

      You've never read the mans work, obviously."


      I suspect that you are just trolling, but I'll bite.

      I find it odd that you would make this claim. One of the major themes in 1984 was that the government knew your location at all times, clearly there were others (i.e. continual propaganda, one minute of hate, perpetual war, thought control, revisionist history, and prohibition against individual expression) however Orwell was vigorously against the idea that the government would know where you were at all times and what you were doing. To say that creating and proliferating a technology that will allow continual and near instantaneous tracking of people isn't Orwellian is to show a deeply misguided understanding of Orwell's work. He clearly expresses this thought when Winston finds the bedroom over the shop in the Prole quarters. He goes on at great length about the freedom that Winston feels being away from the search eyes of the government.

      It isn't so much that I'm against the natural advance in technology or even against the government using that technology to catch criminals. Rather I think that each technological advance gives the government greater and greater control and power in our lives. As their power expands, the transparency of the process to ordinary citizens must increase (which it is not), otherwise I believe we will ultimately end up enslaved.

      Thomas Jefferson once said something to the effect that "Government is like fire, a great servant, but a fearful master." Words to ponder if you care at all about your freedom.

      --

      Doug Tolton

      "The destruction of a value which is, will not bring value to that which isn't." -John Galt
  4. Options... by bobthemuse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long will it take before there's a option on the mobile device to disable this? Even if they don't offer it, I'm sure it'll be hacked pretty quick.

    Or a novel idea, turn the phone off!.

  5. Not the first. by davetrainer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    AT&T Wireless has had this for quite some time. It's called find-a-friend, and it lets you locate and be located by other AT&T GSM customers that you specify. I do have a GSM/GPRS phone with AT&T and I've read a little about the feature, but never used it.

  6. I would love by Liquorman · · Score: 5, Funny

    to use this when waking up after a huge drinking binge to find out where the hell I am.

  7. Hmmm.... by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you see me now? Can you see me now?

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  8. Re:You're not being paranoid enough by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  9. And this is new? by Bagheera · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cell phones are RF devices. They broadcast. They say "I am here!" and the nearest cell tower says "Cool. I'll patch you in here until you reach the next cell." The phone company could track you to within the radius of a given cell since day one. As the technology has matured they've been able to better locate individual phones. It's a side effect of providing better coverage and more efficient service.

    If you're worried about people tracking you by your cell phone, turn it off - and be aware that as soon as you come on the air to make a call, "they" will have a good idea where you are.

    All this new service does is make that knowledge accessible to someone who's not monitoring cell sites inside the system. The addition of GPS in the phones makes it dramatically more accurate, but it's not really a new capability.

    If you're worried about the Law tracking you down by your phone, then you should probably ditch the cell and go back to pay phones. Ditch the calling card too.

    As for parents, if I give my kid a phone, and I care enough about her to wonder where she is, then tracking her with the cell (especially one I'm paying for) is my parental right. Parents are responsible for their kids. Part of that responsibility is having an idea whether they're out raising hell or really are over at their friend's studying like they said they were.

    Bosses? Different matter and entirely situational. Company phone, company car, company time, the boss has the right to know whether or not I'm abusing my privilege. My phone? My time? Hell no.

    Sure, they can track us with our phones. Big fat hairy deal. You don't want them to track you? Then don't carry a -transmitting- radio in your pocket!

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  10. seen it by enbody · · Score: 5, Informative

    I spoke with a developer with a working system. The phone companies can (as in "do now") provide the location information, and security is provided through certificates. If, for the moment, you assume that certificates work, you get to control who gets to see your location information. You can hand it off to your friends or boss, and you can turn it off (stealth mode) at any time. I saw it working and it is pretty impressive (or scary for all the reasons already mentioned). Also, once the infastructure is in place (which it now is), it is trivial to implement.

    Coercive permission and court warrants would get around perfect security (if such a thing existed).
    However, my point is that the infastructure is in place right now (in US) and implementation is easy.