Slashdot Mirror


Phone or Tracking Device?

Red Wolf writes "The first major commercial service that traces people's locations using their mobile phones -- mapAmobile -- is designed more to ease the minds of worried parents and suspicious bosses than to enable unauthorised spying."

33 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. In the name of security by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The provider said safeguards were in place to protect civil liberties."

    That's how it always starts. As more and more companies use it, and when corporations finally control it, those safeguards will slowly be peeled away in the name of security and efficiency - by then it will be so common that most of us probably won't even notice the loss of privacy at all, and others will even encourage it in order to help catch criminals.

    FP

    1. Re:In the name of security by trompete · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hopefully, they will have some sort of limitation where only the account holder of the phone can activate this service. I don't need any psycho ex-girlfriends knowing where I am at all times!!

    2. Re:In the name of security by trompete · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a common misconception: that all Slashdot readers are l33ty Mc. l33ts. Some of us are real-world people who just like to get our nerd news.
      As for the psycho ex-girlfriends...they show up in the access_log of my Apache server all the time.

  2. no thanks... by garcia · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am more worried about the 2005 law that requires GPS/triangulation in all cell phones for 911 call locating. Here's a link to an article in Popular Science about China and how people were using their cell phones to find out which buildings were infected with SARS.

    People play a game where you "kill" a nearby person after you locate them using your cell phone equipped with GPS. Just what I want, ANYONE to be able to locate me on the street (opt-in service or not isn't my point).

    The first major wave of location services could beam to the U.S. as early as Christmas, when 44 percent of the nation's 149.2 million cellphone subscribers are expected to be traceable, according to the research firm In-Stat/MDR.

    No thanks, I would prefer to die after placing a call to 911 rather than have whoever decide that they want to track me via GPS/triangulation.

    Live free or die.

    Just my worthless .02

    1. Re:no thanks... by dynamosteve92 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Prefer to Die? Prove it. i think you're full of shit.

    2. Re:no thanks... by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then dont use a cell phone.

      Theres nothing anonymous about cell technology, there never was, and never will be.

      It's idiotic to think so. You can trace a land line, whats special about a cell phone?

      Frankly I dont give a rats ass if you die on the side of the road after calling 911. I'm more worried about the people in the other car, who aren't nearly as paranoid and delusional as you are.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:no thanks... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      land lines aren't carried around with you where ever you go. If you decide to pick up and go to City X no one knows that you did that.

      Old school triangulation was an effort that took quite a bit of time and wasn't something that was used all the time.

      I don't need my cell phone being equipped with GPS and having them beam localized advertisements to my exact location (I am standing outside McDonalds in downtown Place X) and BAM, a text message that says "Eat Rotton Ronnies Today!"

      How about I leave the house and drive down the road at 91mph because I feel like it and the police track me going 91, wait for me ahead, and pull me over?

      That's what I am worried about.

    4. Re:no thanks... by Planesdragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about I leave the house and drive down the road at 91mph because I feel like it and the police track me going 91, wait for me ahead, and pull me over?

      That's what I am worried about.


      God, I'm not worried about that. You might as well bitch about radar detectors. (Speed Limits, while a tad bit low, are a good idea. You going at 91 anywhere but a nearly-empty highway is reckless endangerment--and in NYS, it'll [rightly] get you tossed in jail.)

      Anyway...

      If you're going to worry about tracking, worry about inaccuracy and corruption. Worry about psychotic ex-boyfriends hacking the system and coming after you. Worry about being politically opporessed. And after you worry, figure out an effective check on the darn thing. (A local log of who pings for your location would solve the first; standard checks against corruption would help against the second.)

  3. Unauthorized spying? by Hayzeus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but "easing the mind of a suspicious boss" is still "unauthorized spying" by any reasonable definition of the term.

    1. Re:Unauthorized spying? by Hayzeus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You should accept the fact that the comapny owns your time when you are at work, and in most companies where working late hours you should accept that your boss has the right to monitor your behavior also when you are not at work.

      While the first part of the statement makes sense, the second -- for most occupations -- makes none at all. What imperative -- moral, legal or otherwise -- does an employer have to monitor my behaviour, location, eating habits, bowel movements or anything else while I'm not on company time? Can a project manager come over and raid my refrigerator? Kick my dog? Can the CEO drop by and have sex with my wife?

      Employment does not, and should not equate with ownership of the employed. An employer pays for a limited subset of time and skills of any worker, and is due nothing more.

    2. Re:Unauthorized spying? by sploxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your post seems to be a good argument why worker unions still have some fights left, contrary to popular belief. There seem to be things still unclear to some people and there seem to be an erosion of rights for employees. These are new areas of problems in employment, this total control, and obviously, looking at your opinion, there have to be laws to enforce human, and also productive working conditions.

  4. Worse than Orwellian!! by dtolton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find the wording of the press release ironic.

    <paraphrase>
    This device isn't really for spying, it's more to allow parents to spy
    on their children, and employers to spy on their employees.
    </paraphrase>

    They of course fail to mention that if the technology were available, a judge
    could easily grant a warrant to allow authorities to observe your
    movements without notifying you.

    In many ways this is worse than Orwellian, because at least in
    Orwell's vision, you could still hide from the cameras or escape to
    places that didn't have cameras on them. With this device if you had
    it on (assuming it works as well as they claim (doubtful)) they could
    pinpoint your location all the time. I guess you could just leave it
    in your office while you went to play that round of golf and say you
    were in a meeting. ;)

    Still this technology is simply a herald of more instrusive technology
    to come. Move over Orwell, the future may be worse than you imagined.
    As someone said in an earlier story, doubleplusungood.

    --

    Doug Tolton

    "The destruction of a value which is, will not bring value to that which isn't." -John Galt
    1. Re:Worse than Orwellian!! by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 3, Informative

      In many ways this is worse than Orwellian, because at least in Orwell's vision, you could still hide from the cameras or escape to places that didn't have cameras on them. With this device if you had it on (assuming it works as well as they claim (doubtful)) they could pinpoint your location all the time

      Firstly this has been available for over 6 months and it works. Secondly the facility has to be enabled on the phone, and disabling is no more complex than a menu selection. Thirdly any cellular telephone will give away your location to anyone with even the most rudimentary equipment.

    2. Re:Worse than Orwellian!! by dtolton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " It's not orwellian, it's not even close.

      You've never read the mans work, obviously."


      I suspect that you are just trolling, but I'll bite.

      I find it odd that you would make this claim. One of the major themes in 1984 was that the government knew your location at all times, clearly there were others (i.e. continual propaganda, one minute of hate, perpetual war, thought control, revisionist history, and prohibition against individual expression) however Orwell was vigorously against the idea that the government would know where you were at all times and what you were doing. To say that creating and proliferating a technology that will allow continual and near instantaneous tracking of people isn't Orwellian is to show a deeply misguided understanding of Orwell's work. He clearly expresses this thought when Winston finds the bedroom over the shop in the Prole quarters. He goes on at great length about the freedom that Winston feels being away from the search eyes of the government.

      It isn't so much that I'm against the natural advance in technology or even against the government using that technology to catch criminals. Rather I think that each technological advance gives the government greater and greater control and power in our lives. As their power expands, the transparency of the process to ordinary citizens must increase (which it is not), otherwise I believe we will ultimately end up enslaved.

      Thomas Jefferson once said something to the effect that "Government is like fire, a great servant, but a fearful master." Words to ponder if you care at all about your freedom.

      --

      Doug Tolton

      "The destruction of a value which is, will not bring value to that which isn't." -John Galt
  5. This is why... by sahonen · · Score: 4, Funny

    I keep my cell phone encased in lead.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  6. Options... by bobthemuse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long will it take before there's a option on the mobile device to disable this? Even if they don't offer it, I'm sure it'll be hacked pretty quick.

    Or a novel idea, turn the phone off!.

  7. SIM Card tracking? by marshac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how this works since SIM cards are pretty small. Regardless, I like it.... to a point. Where I work, we have a lot of people who drive a lot of miles in their own cars. At $.365/mile, this adds up quickly (almost $1200/month). Even still, almost all of them cheat padding their monthly miles, or taking a very long route to get someplace. If they KNEW that they could be tracked, it might give honesty a kick in the pants. Where I don't like it is when someone is spied upon and never told. That's just not cool.

  8. Riiight... by Phoenix823 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is designed more to ease the minds of worried parents and suspicious bosses than to enable unauthorised spying."

    And Kazaa is really just designed to transfer information back and forth. It's not Sharman Network's fault that it gets used to infringe on an incredible number of copyrights.

    Let's face it, just because it was designed to ease parents and bosses, that's no guarantee whatsoever that they will not be used to violate one's civil liberties. RFIDs are designed to help stores keep inventory and make checkouts easier, but they can be easily abused to "see" what someone is wearing on his person.

    We champion the right to use products in nonstandard ways all the time here at /., we say it's alright to use the Xbox as a home PC even though that's not what it was designed for. For that very reason alone, I am 100% sure that this will be used to infringe on at least one person's privacy.

    And I think to myself, what a wonderful world.

  9. Sorry.. by Neuracnu+Coyote · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..but if you are really interested in moving around throughout this land of ours with being tracked by big brother's watchful eye in the sky, then you can LEAVE YOUR NOKIA AT HOME.

    It's a no-brainer.

    --
    --
  10. Not the first. by davetrainer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    AT&T Wireless has had this for quite some time. It's called find-a-friend, and it lets you locate and be located by other AT&T GSM customers that you specify. I do have a GSM/GPRS phone with AT&T and I've read a little about the feature, but never used it.

  11. I would love by Liquorman · · Score: 5, Funny

    to use this when waking up after a huge drinking binge to find out where the hell I am.

  12. "Consent is required," of course, BUT by morven2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, what value is coerced consent? The two groups of people this is clearly intended to be used on -- children and employees -- will not be 'consenting' in any kind of free manner.

    'Consent because I'm your legal guardian and can consent on your behalf' and 'Consent or lose your job' don't really count as consent in my book.

    The cellphone is becoming a tool for employers to squeeze away the last vestiges of a personal life for their employees. First is the expecation of being contactable at all hours, day or night, instantaneously (and thus the expectation that people will never be doing anything they can't be called away from). Now, they can't just contact you, they can find out where you are, at any moment, and without your knowledge.

    And as for those of us living in the United States, you really think the Justice Dept. isn't going to press for access to this kind of thing -- with as little judicial safeguards as they can get away with?

    Ugh.

  13. Hmmm.... by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you see me now? Can you see me now?

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  14. Re:You're not being paranoid enough by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  15. Three words by WCMI92 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Turn it off...

    I keep my cell off a lot. Why? I use it for MY convienence... It's for me to make a call, not to be pestered when I'm in the car, at the mall, eating dinner, etc.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  16. And this is new? by Bagheera · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cell phones are RF devices. They broadcast. They say "I am here!" and the nearest cell tower says "Cool. I'll patch you in here until you reach the next cell." The phone company could track you to within the radius of a given cell since day one. As the technology has matured they've been able to better locate individual phones. It's a side effect of providing better coverage and more efficient service.

    If you're worried about people tracking you by your cell phone, turn it off - and be aware that as soon as you come on the air to make a call, "they" will have a good idea where you are.

    All this new service does is make that knowledge accessible to someone who's not monitoring cell sites inside the system. The addition of GPS in the phones makes it dramatically more accurate, but it's not really a new capability.

    If you're worried about the Law tracking you down by your phone, then you should probably ditch the cell and go back to pay phones. Ditch the calling card too.

    As for parents, if I give my kid a phone, and I care enough about her to wonder where she is, then tracking her with the cell (especially one I'm paying for) is my parental right. Parents are responsible for their kids. Part of that responsibility is having an idea whether they're out raising hell or really are over at their friend's studying like they said they were.

    Bosses? Different matter and entirely situational. Company phone, company car, company time, the boss has the right to know whether or not I'm abusing my privilege. My phone? My time? Hell no.

    Sure, they can track us with our phones. Big fat hairy deal. You don't want them to track you? Then don't carry a -transmitting- radio in your pocket!

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  17. In other news by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Funny
    In other news: Sales in tin-foil up 5%! Film at 11.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  18. GPS jammer by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 3, Informative
    I guess its time to build your own GPS jammer.
    Overview
    A low cost device to temporarily disable the reception of the civilian course acquisition (C/A) code used for the standard positioning service (SPS)[1] on the Global Positioning System (GPS/NAVSTAR) L1 frequency of 1575.42 MHz.

    This is accomplished by transmitting a narrowband Gaussian noise signal, with a deviation of +/- 1.023 MHz, on the L1 GPS frequency itself. This technique is a little more complicated than a simple continuous wave (CW) jammer, but tends to be more effective (i.e. harder to filter) against spread spectrum based radio receivers. ...

  19. There is no GPS by jetmarc · · Score: 3, Informative

    This system seems to be UK based. In UK, the digital cellular systems is GSM/PCS. GSM base stations have a theoretical maximum diameter of 35km (15-20 miles?). Since the 1999/2000 boom in subscriber quantity, most cells top out at 2-3km and can be as small as 100m (300 foot) in town centers. Also, cells usually are segmented into 3 slices of 120 degrees each, to maximize channel re-usage ability.

    Another GSM feature is the "timing advance", which roughly indicates the distance of a mobile from its base station. It is necessary, because GSM is time multiplexed. A mobile is assigned a "time slot" for transmission. To avoid interference between mobiles that are far away from the base stations and those that are near, the far mobile sends its packet a little bit too early. It then travels a the speed that radio waves use to have and arrives dead-on its time slot. While "timing advance" is originally used only for this purpose, it obviously also is a good indication of where the mobile is.

    The mobile knows all these values - each base station has a unique identifiyer, and the timing advance is measured every N seconds (which btw is the reason why GSM mobiles are spec'ed for travel speeds of 250km/h max).

    The trace system basically "phones-home" this information, where the base station ID is looked up in a database to find out where the mobile is.

    This is not new. Former Viag Interkom in Germany offered such a service, too. Once registered, you could look up the position of a mobile through an internet page. There's also a travel assistance service of D1 Telekom Germany, where you call in, hang up, the system traces your position, and sends a text message with traffic jam information etc (for your current position) to your mobile.

    All these systems base on the same method of locating you, but are marketed differently.

    But back on-topic: there is no GPS. As simple as that.

  20. My phone has it.. by nolife · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My Sanyo 4900 has a location service. The paper instructions and phones internal help system claim if I shut the location system off, only 911 facilities will be able to know my location. What this really tells me is that it is always on from the phone end but Sprint will only pass the signal to the 911 system, not anyone who wants it. I also assume that the police will also have access to this also if needed or wanted. There is NOTHING that prevents law enforcement from going to Sprint or any other carrier and requesting a list of all users that were in a certain area at a certain time. This IS what the system is really being pushed for and why the Office of Homeland Security is the government department responsible for this E911 service implementation.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  21. What's the big deal? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 3, Funny

    My telecom is always able to track me if i'm using my phone. Of course, I have a landline...

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  22. seen it by enbody · · Score: 5, Informative

    I spoke with a developer with a working system. The phone companies can (as in "do now") provide the location information, and security is provided through certificates. If, for the moment, you assume that certificates work, you get to control who gets to see your location information. You can hand it off to your friends or boss, and you can turn it off (stealth mode) at any time. I saw it working and it is pretty impressive (or scary for all the reasons already mentioned). Also, once the infastructure is in place (which it now is), it is trivial to implement.

    Coercive permission and court warrants would get around perfect security (if such a thing existed).
    However, my point is that the infastructure is in place right now (in US) and implementation is easy.

  23. Can't help but think... by babyrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems the general consensus here is opretty negative on this technology due to it's potential for abuse. However I can't help but feel if a couple of Uni students rigged up the same thing in their dorm room with a couple of pringles cans and aan empty pizza box, everyone would be applauding at how cool it is and how it has the potential to save the world.

    Just a thought...