Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Space Legos!

Posted by michael on from the space-station-on-the-cheap dept.

mfarver writes "The Air Force is seeking research proposals for Space Legos. Now you can have your childhood fantasies of playing with blocks and getting paid for it. Actually, its not a bad concept, standarized components that can be "plugged" together in space for different functions."

9 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. Say It With Me... by GTRacer · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...space legos

    Space Lego Blocks, dammit!

    GTRacer
    - Looking for a 953...

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  2. Re: Lego, no Legos! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    > The plural is Lego.

    No, the plural is BeoLego! Or LegoWulf. Either way is good.

    Now, imagine a MindStorm of these! :)

  3. Accuracy by tsa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We tried to build a machine from Lego in our research group a few years ago, when Mindstorm had just hit the shelves, but we found the accuracy of the movement was quite bad. So it can only be used for a limited range of experiments. On the other hand, it is very cheap compared to custom-build machines and therefore certainly worth taking a look at.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Accuracy by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed. I've made several robots out of legos (not even mindstorm sets - just plain old Technic sets, motors salvaged from old coputer hardware, an old PC, and a good dollop of hot melt glue ;) )

      The gears and other components are certintly NOT indended for accuracy by any stretch of the imagination. But they are fairly cheap, robust (except for those little 8-tooth gears...) and easy to assemble into just about anything you need.

      I even built a joystick out of legos once. There was a bit of play in it, but not too much. What really killed it was the lack of a self-centering mechanism. You really go all over the place in an energetic game of Descent!
      =Smidge=

  4. A good idea? by MacEnvy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't this sounds a lot like how the Replicators got started on Stargate SG-1? Believe me, we don't need any damn replictors ...

    My motto is, if the Asgard can't do it, I shouldn't attempt it.

    --


    ***
  5. This and that... by neglige · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmmmm...

    You might want to build some of this like that. Lego all the way.

    --
    My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
  6. It's the Borg! by Ydna · · Score: 2, Funny
    From the website:

    In this example, five or more modules, each with processors, are connected together, forming a collective. When one module is removed, the "collective" senses the removal and adjusts accordingly.
    Next thing you know, we'll build this thing and send it off to the delta quadrant for further development.

    --

    "The great thing about multitasking is that several things can go wrong at once." -me

  7. Yes! thank you! by bad_fx · · Score: 3, Informative
    Troll? WTH? Take a look at this quote from lego.com:

    If the LEGO trademark is used at all, it should always be used as an adjective, not as a noun. For example, say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGO BRICKS". Never say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGOs".


    from here. "Legos" makes no sense, dangit. How and why did people even start saying "legos"? The blocks/parts aren't legos! They're called LEGO blocks or blocks of LEGO or LEGO bricks or LEGO pieces... See, there's so many damn choices, why do people insist on legos? Gah! When I wuz a kid we knew what to call LEGO.
  8. Re: Lego, no Legos! by neonstz · · Score: 2, Informative
    And, in reality, it's LeGo....even if the company won't admit it...the name of the company comes from the Danish words "Leg Godt" which mean "Play Good".

    If the company won't admit it, why do they mention it on their webpages?