Slashdot Mirror


LWCE Wrapup

An anonymous reader writes "Extremetech.com reports that: 'Computer scientists from think tank SRI will present a novel take on distributed computing at LinuxWorld, all in a search for a little lost penguin.' For more information on Centibots, head over to the Centibots Project homepage." ReadthePaper writes "I just read a great interview with Jon "Maddog" Hall of Linux International." And finally, Hawkxor writes "Sun Microsystems VP Jonathon Schwartz demoed Sun's new desktop-oriented Linux distro 'Mad Hatter' and 3-D Desktop Environment 'Looking Glass' at LinuxWorld. Sounds pretty cool."

92 comments

  1. My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some guy from SCO held a gun at my head, and said I had to pay $100 to leave the Linux conference. It felt like robbery, but he said it was just licensing. I'm not sure if I believe that.

    1. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am the bitch of xor

  2. Re:Back from the dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahha. Mod this up!

  3. Typical Sun Quote by Valar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The thing I worry about most with the open source community is the sentiment that open source is somehow different. It isn't," he said.
    Sounds just like the typical Sun opinion about Linux (and open source) in general. They miss the point and focus on the free-as-in-beer part (and therefore focus on producing cheap solutions) instead of the free as in speech part (and cooperate with the developers a little more).

    1. Re:Typical Sun Quote by __past__ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, they don't focus on any kind of "free-as-in-foo" part. They focus on the "good-as-in-reliably-solves-problems" part. Not the most stupid thing to base decisions on, and fortunatly some open source developers also consider that important, even if reading /. often suggests otherwise.

    2. Re:Typical Sun Quote by swordgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh yeah, Sun and their skewed idea of "free." They came up with crazy ideas like Free-as-in-NFS, and free-as-in-NIS. Evil dirty proprietary bastards!

      Sun wants to sell stuff (hardware and software), make money, and solve problems. They don't give a shit about the proper attitude to hold when approaching Linux--and they SHOULDN'T! There's nothing sacred about it.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    3. Re:Typical Sun Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both this post and the above about Sun are nothing but opinion. Perhaps the poster's work at Sun? Anyway, the anti-Sun post is moderated higher which seems to be so common on this forum. WTF? Please correct this moderators.

    4. Re:Typical Sun Quote by Valar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because it is important to the open source community that you have the proper attitude. If you take, and use open source software for commercial gains, and ensure that the actual open source versions stay one step behind you are basically stealing. Maybe not legally, but I think, to some extent, morally. You are using the efforts of developers that you do not pay for corporate. Now, that said, Sun does have a pretty decent record, early on, of contribution. However, lately, they are asking more what open source can do for them than what they can do for open source. Yes, this is a perfectly natural thing for a company to do, but we should hardly praise Sun for the idea of taking Linux, adding a couple of proprietary features and then using it on their workstations and desktops, so that they can get free development.

    5. Re:Typical Sun Quote by __past__ · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If you take, and use open source software for commercial gains, and ensure that the actual open source versions stay one step behind you are basically stealing.
      Whoa. And I thought the RIAA was insane. It is stealing if you use software in compliance with the license the authors themselves chose to publish it under?

      However, lately, they are asking more what open source can do for them than what they can do for open source. Yes, this is a perfectly natural thing for a company to do, but we should hardly praise Sun for the idea of taking Linux, adding a couple of proprietary features and then using it on their workstations and desktops, so that they can get free development.
      Not to mention adding a couple of free features that Linux users (and vendors) get for free. You do realize that they contribute heavily to Gnome, for example? Of course they do it in their own interest - the first version of Solaris with pre-installed Gnome was just released a week or two ago. Still, everything that is not Solaris-specific is now part of mainstream Gnome.

      OpenOffice.org isn't exactly a small contribution either. Sure, they are probably quite happy about unpaid contributors that make their proprietary StarOffice better, but I'd say that this is quite a fair deal. And there are also some smaller projects, like XMLroff, an XSL FO formatter that I personally consider very promising.

      So please, take your "proper attitude" elsewhere and don't talk about things you have no idea about.

    6. Re:Typical Sun Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They miss the point and focus on the free-as-in-beer part (and therefore focus on producing cheap solutions) instead of the free as in speech part

      *TWHAP*
      What company recently spend millions to acquire a mature desktop office software suite, and then released the source code open source? What company recently bought into Netscape when it was strapped for cash, on the ropes, and looking like it was MS road kill?

      I am SOOOOO sick of the slashdotters bashing Sun as somehow an evil unix corporation that just "doesn't get it". Lemme tell you. Sun is the one unix company that believe in the social importance of computing ('the network is the computer' was their slogan even before the public understood what the internet was). They give to charities, they sponsor responsible products. Let me also say, linux boy, that it will be a cold day in hell when your little toy OS even comes close to the UNREAL ability of SunOS to stay up under all kinda punishment.

      So go ahead, point to your little anecdotes about Farmer Bob switching from a Sun box to a linux box his counsin put in for him. While you spray your spit about "free as in freedom", there's a company out there that, yes, is earning a profit, and YES, is socially responsible and giving back.

      Disagree with me? Uninstall openoffice. Uninstall mozilla. Get the fuck outa here, leeenux SCO copycat.

    7. Re:Typical Sun Quote by oldmanmtn · · Score: 2, Interesting
      By referring to this as a "typical Sun opinion", it's pretty clear that you came to this with an pre-existing bias. I think you're reading more into this than is really there, and you're the one who is missing the point.

      I think the point he is trying to make is that in the end, software is all just bits on a disk. There is nothing about the development process that makes open source software magically better. Good software always takes hard work, thorough testing, and talented developers.

      It's pretty clear (to me at least) that he is really talking about the typical customer or end user - not a developer. For somebody who is looking to roll out 1000 "Mad Hatter" desktops to secretaries and/or phone support people, the "free beer" aspect is more important than the "free speech" aspect. This isn't an environment where they are going to be upgrading the OS, applications, or windowing system with the latest tinderbox bits every night. They want something that works well and doesn't cost too much. They don't care whether it was developed by a corporate engineering team, an open source project, or an infinite number of monkeys.

      --
      - Old Man of the Mountain ---- "I want to disturb my neighbor"
    8. Re:Typical Sun Quote by forgotmypassword · · Score: 1

      it will be a cold day in hell when your little toy OS even comes close to the UNREAL ability of SunOS to stay up under all kinda punishment

      Ya. It's really too bad they dumped SunOS and switched to Solaris.

    9. Re:Typical Sun Quote by Valar · · Score: 1

      To clarify what I meant by the stealing bit, I was referring to companies that basically take open source, make one or two small changes, and then use a huge name to make huge profits.

      Or even when companies use open source and pass it off as their own work. Remember when sections of some BSD utilities were found in microsoft utilities (i.e. the version of ftp in windows)? Sure, they were legally allowed to use those under the BSD liscense, but don't you think it is a little suspect that they never once mentioned that they had borrowed code from BSD, or even claimed that it was their unique technology? They weren't required to under the terms of the liscense, so I guess they shouldn't have, right?

      Don't get me wrong. This isn't 'poor independant open source' versus 'massive evil corporation', I just think that the original quote (remember, that's where this gave from) shows Sun's attitude towards open source, one that I (obviously) don't entirely agree with.

    10. Re:Typical Sun Quote by bryam · · Score: 1

      Where are the real contribution from Sun to the *Linux* project?

      Always said OpenOffice, Sun Grid, JXTA, ...but, where are their contributions to the Linux kernel or core libraries??

      Is more easy to say: "Linux doesn't scale good" than work for "Enterprise" scalability on Linux. I know that they are join to OSDL recently. But when thay support and extend the Linux kernel (like IBM or HP for example)?

    11. Re:Typical Sun Quote by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      /* then use a huge name to make huge profits. */

      Uh, who the fuck is doing that? Define huge profits. Redhat is making money, but NOTHING that could be considered huge. IBM? They're making money off hardware and support, they just happen to sell Linux as part of the deal (for some customers). SUN? HA! It must be SCO, then. Most companies/individuals that are making money off of Open Source are not making HUGE profits. Most are simply making a living.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    12. Re:Typical Sun Quote by Phishpin · · Score: 1

      SunOS is the basis of Solaris. SunOS is the the OS, Solaris is that plus all the other goodies.

      --
      -phish
    13. Re:Typical Sun Quote by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      " Because it is important to the open source community that you have the proper attitude."

      Oh, this is so cute I want to pat you on the head.

      The proper attitude? The proper attitude is to run your business and make a profit within the laws. The ONLY attitude a company (or anyone else) has to have is one that doesn't land them in court.

      That may or not be moral, but that's irrelevant. Utterly irrelevant.

      I mean, if a developer is going to write code and release it under the GPL (or any other free-ish license), then they have to accept that it will be used by whoever wants to use it, and for their own best interests. There was a discussion about open source software being used by governments for military purposes (often very violent and death-related), and the answer was the same: If you release it, then shut up and deal with it.

      Now as far as praising Sun (or not), I would ask you the following questions:

      1) What proprietary features has Sun added to Linux on the desktop (or anywhere else)?
      2) Where did Linux come from in the first place? (stealing concepts and functionality is OK, but stealing code isn't?)
      3) What is preventing the (free) developers from reproducing every proprietary feature that Sun has added, and GPLing the code?
      3a) Worded differently, how can Sun "ensure that the actual open source versions stay one step behind you?"
      4) If you don't like it, why not release code under a different license?

      You seem to be under the misaprehension that releasing GPL'ed code somehow puts a moral responsiblity on all users of that code to put their contributions back into the community. In fact, all it really does is revoke bitching rights from the developers when their code is used in ways they don't like. (but within the terms of the license)

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    14. Re:Typical Sun Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without OpenOffice, do you think Linux would be even 25% as palatable on the desktop as it is? It takes more than just a kernel to create a useful environment.

  4. Base Linux Distro? by GreatOgre · · Score: 1

    Who wants to bet that Sun is using OpenServer as their base distro?

    1. Re:Base Linux Distro? by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I googled for "Looking glass desktop" and the first result was "Install New Icons in Caldera's Looking Glass Desktop. Coincidence or not?

  5. Instead of searching for the penguin... by corebreech · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...they should have programmed the bots to go looking for all that SCO-infringing kernel code.

    Or beer.

    (did I spell that right?)

    1. Re:Instead of searching for the penguin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fuck Centibots.

      No more Quake and/or quick nap in my server room.

    2. Re:Instead of searching for the penguin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you did.

  6. "linux approaching XP stability" by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    Anyone else notice that garbage in the side bar...

    And you expect me to belive anything else that page says after that?

    Hmm 90% less then microsoft products.. thats still too much to charge.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:"linux approaching XP stability" by Valar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw that too, and clicked through...it looks like what they meant was actually 'linux approaching XP ease of configuration.' Obviously, these are two very different things. Furthermore, the writers seem to not understand the difference at all. Can you really be a credible tech writer, if you confuse 'stability' with 'easy to use setup'?

    2. Re:"linux approaching XP stability" by Bake · · Score: 1

      Where did you see that?

      The only thing remotely resembling this in the IT world link is "Study: Linux nears Windows XP in usability", which was covered by slashdot very recently.

    3. Re:"linux approaching XP stability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's true. 2.4 was the least stable "stable" kernel so far, and the newer 2.6 isn't even officially stable yet. If this downward slide continues, Linux's stability will soon match 2k/XP's.

  7. SouthPark knockoff? by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    So would that be Kenny (or whoever wears red) from SouthPark as #5 there in the pic?

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  8. Misleading story by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 4, Funny

    I clicked on the link, fully expecting to see robot centipedes. After all, it's called "Centibots", so what else could it be, right ? My excitement piqued when I saw the title: "Linux Powered Robot Swarm Descends on LinuxWorld". Excellent! Not just a single centipede robot, but a whole swarm of them, attacking LinuxWorld! Imagine my disappointment when I learned that these were not killer Linux centipede robots, but a rather ordinary swarm of peaceful robots, powered by Linux. Oh well, I guess that's pretty cool too.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    1. Re:Misleading story by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Imagine my disappointment when I learned that these were not killer Linux centipede robots, but a rather ordinary swarm of peaceful robots, powered by Linux. Oh well, I guess that's pretty cool too.

      From the site:
      The Centibots project, funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), is aimed at developing new technology to support the coordinated deployment of as many as 100 robots for missions such as urban surveillance.

      I would hardly call them peaceful.... This is a project for war.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:Misleading story by thynk · · Score: 1

      From the site:
      The Centibots project, funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), is aimed at developing new technology to support the coordinated deployment of as many as 100 robots for missions such as urban surveillance.

      I would hardly call them peaceful.... This is a project for war.


      I think the grandparent to this was trying to say "peaceful as in non-flesh eating and unarmed" rather than "peaceful as in not used for any military purpose" - but since I'm not him, I could be wrong.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    3. Re:Misleading story by finallyHasANickname · · Score: 1
      Imagine my disappointment when I learned that these were not killer Linux centipede robots, but a rather ordinary swarm of peaceful robots, powered by Linux. Oh well, I guess that's pretty cool too.

      On a more serious (but still pleasant) note, is it just me, or is there a little too much testosterone superimposed, in robot culture? Once in a while I see a documentary on Discovery about a lady scientist who is coo-ing daily at a baby emulation robot, only to discover that her software (amazing) and hardware (primative/serviceable in a nifty way) is working pretty well...

      Wait a second. I know. The problem is that disaster is not eminent. If this were a sinking ship, we would think, "Women and children first." Because robotics is not doomed, we can go along at an even keel, confident in the future of civilization, and get robots to do the every-day, generic, regular, standard-issue, run-of-the-mill warfare on TV. Yeah. Now it all makes sense to me.

      ;-)

      BTW, I still play DOOM once in a while so don't think I've gotten all foo foo on ya. (chuckle)

      Hey! Wait a second. Just before hitting the submit button (no pun intended), it just occurred to me that there is a sort of correlation in personality type (and level of social skill, etc. etc. ;-) with those who would decide to design and build robots. Perhaps due to this correlation, someone wants to compensate. I mean, yeah, in principle, a robot could be designed with intrinsic motivation by a man with big arms who can bench press 300 pounds and can still slam dunk a live animal into a regulation basketball hoop while keeping his cool and his composure and his self-regard in front of a live audience of people who despise him and who jeer at him. In principle, and in the very same "social conditions", he could give a twirl to his propeller beanie immediately thereafter. In principle, the Fourteenth Amendment (one class of citizens) makes me equally suitable as a partnered citizen with Jennifer Lopez, but...

  9. Penguin hunting... by Handpaper · · Score: 1

    running on a proprietary SRI PacketHop network
    Proprietary network closing in around the penguin - NOT an image that fills me with joy.
    Any idea why this can't run on plain ol' 802.11?

    1. Re:Penguin hunting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because creating an ad-hoc 802.11 network between 20-100 robots moving around an area the size of a military base would be a real pain in the ass (no AP, remember?). I'd imagine SRI probably saw a need to design a better protocol for distributed node discovery over a wider range where nodes may enter and leave the area at any time. Think ZeroConf/Rendezvous with routing capability, and you'll see why TCP/IP-802.11 might not work.

      "Proprietary network closing in around the penguin"-- please, the Berkeley TCP/IP stack is so widespread it's never going to get replaced by anything (even if someone does invent a better protocol :)

  10. Awards speech by Faust7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    to explore and map an area that is inaccessible to human, such as a building full of toxic gas or smoke.

    "Thanks to the efforts of these robots, we now know that this building we couldn't enter due to its being filled with toxic gas does contain chemical weapons. And we've found that this other building we couldn't enter due to smoke is indeed on fire and has people inside; once the fire's died down, we'll know exactly where to go to get them out."

  11. Can't help but wonder... by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    ...who was responsible for the Tom Servo color scheme and the rather-fruitily-named "ROBOTO" in the second pic.

    That dude standing in the hallway is my guess.

  12. Ironically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Looking Glass' was the first commercial dekstop released by Caldera in Caldera Network Desktop 1.0 (though it was some commercial desktop that they purchased the rights to). Go figure.

  13. Looking Glass? by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

    This isn't the same Looking Glass released by Caldera/SCO around 1995, is it?

    1. Re:Looking Glass? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      It had better not be, or SCO will be sueing Sun next!

    2. Re:Looking Glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The LookingGlass desktop Caldera shippped was licenced from a company named Visix. No copywrites, etc. were sold to them so they wouldn't have the legal rights to sue.

      Come to think of it, this sounds exactly like the same situation with their lawsuit with IBM so maybe Sun better watch out after all.

  14. Mad Hatter = Red Hat Distribution by MikeD83 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sun has maintained an air of mystery about what specific Linux distribution will form the basis of Mad Hatter, and yesterday Schwartz declined to name the distribution that his demonstration was based on,

    Let me take the aura of mystery away- it's obviously based on Red Hat. If it wasn't I'm sure Red Hat would take serious issue in the product name.

    1. Re:Mad Hatter = Red Hat Distribution by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Sun has announced marketing/co-branding/co-development agreements with both RedHat and SuSE.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Mad Hatter = Red Hat Distribution by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      in case you didnt notice (mad hatter, looking glass etc...) the code names for these products are taking a "alice in wonder land" naming scheme. which last i checked was several decades older than redhat.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Mad Hatter = Red Hat Distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      posting as AC to preserve my job

      it's SuSE for the desktop & Red Hat for the servers.

      Sun is being smart & not getting locked in to one distro.

      IIRC that strategy is serving IBM fairly well

    4. Re:Mad Hatter = Red Hat Distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has to be red hat-- unless Suse all the sudden decides to support gnome more vigorously
      This seems to be a requirement for them, considering the direction they are taking with StarOffice/OpenOffice for example:
      "Q" concept ... check 3.1.5

    5. Re:Mad Hatter = Red Hat Distribution by bryam · · Score: 1

      What happen with Mad Hatter after Novell adquire Ximian?.
      Ximian build several Mad Hatter components: Evolution, GNOME, Ximian connectors, Red Carpet.

    6. Re:Mad Hatter = Red Hat Distribution by bryam · · Score: 1

      Darl? are you? :-)

  15. Microsoft Booth Fun by mishan · · Score: 5, Funny

    One fun thing that happened at LinuxWorld was this guy who decided to put up a Penguin Computing poster on Microsoft's booth without them knowing it. He walked over the booth with me behind him as camera-man and talked with the lady there for a while and I, myself, didn't even notice that he had put up the poster! See a close-up and the full metal jacket.

    1. Re:Microsoft Booth Fun by strider3700 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is funny, however I'm wondering what microsoft was doing there? Are they using or at least working with linux these days or was this just another chance to spread FUD?

    2. Re:Microsoft Booth Fun by mishan · · Score: 1

      Actually, they were selling some sort of "UNIX services" that would run on Linux. What was REALLY lame was that the HP bags that were given out in the lobby of the Moscone center were full of all sorts of crap including some "Oracle Unbreakable Linux" CD and "Microsoft UNIX Services" CD. I think they even had an issue of "Oracle Magazine" (I kid you not) bundled in the bag.

  16. It's the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    linux is still less useful and stability than XP. Why can't you losers just accept that?

    1. Re:It's the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I just installed Win3.11, and it's not too stable. Plus, the multitasking doesn't seem to work too well. I'd say linux is pretty far ahead of WinXp311. Most of the third party applications I have tried has also failed to work

  17. Looking Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know of demo movies/images of Sun's "Looking Glass" GUI?

    1. Re:Looking Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a photo on http://www.gulker.com/ If you scroll halfway down.

      click here

  18. Showed this to my boss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As an example of how immature the linux crowd is. He then promptly tossed out a proposal some OSS geek gave in a lame attemp to allow him to convert out Windows server.


    Man that guy was such a loser.

    1. Re:Showed this to my boss. by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

      The only loser I see here is your boss for ignoring Linux because he didn't find a joke funny.

      Now THAT is funny! :-)

    2. Re:Showed this to my boss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. They should be more like the MS programmers and go piss on the netscape campus lawns, and code "netscape engineers are weenies" in their DLLs.

      That and rape 12 year old boys at lunch like Billy boy does.

  19. Linuxworld is a criminal gathering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Face it you terrorists, Linux is illegal. It was stolen from SCO. Just a reminder, if you are caught using Linux you will be sent to a FEMA concentration camp. Linux does not have a place in the New World Order, so turn in your copies of Linux, along with your guns, at your local Office of Homeland Security.

    Sincerely,
    Herr Ashcroft

  20. sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're following the white rabbit

  21. I can only think of one appropriate reply to this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please put my balls in your mouth.

    Love Always,
    News For Turds

  22. Re:LWCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    whatever happened to those cool spiked helmets the Germans wore.

    Apparently those cool spikes on the helmets made cool targets in the trenches.

  23. A visitor's wrapup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oracle promoted their "Unbreakable Linux Pavilion". I considered trying to break it but figured Moscone Center security wouldn't like that, so I just sat down for a speech. As the guy was talking, one of the signs fell off the podium.

    One booth (it might have been Computer Associates) needed a "grammar checker" that could remove "extraneous" quotation "marks".

    Microsoft had a medium sized pavilion. Even with how crowded the place was, most people avoided it like the plague.

    Novell is porting its products to Linux. This is the probably the most important development going on in the entire computer industry right now. Novell's administration tools are generally considered top-notch but nobody uses them because nobody wants to learn Novell's OS when they can use other tools available on familiar Windows or Sun. Novell is porting its client-side tools as well. They have a cross-platform Groupwise client in beta right now. For many organizations that stuck with Novell, Groupwise has been a killer app preventing desktop Linux deployment. With Novell filling the gaps of groupware and LDAP network administration, Linux becomes more suitable for the business desktop. Still, Novell has to learn to undercut Windows's price for equivalent functionality. One of the big reasons NT caught on was because it was cheaper than Novell.

    Genaware is the only company I've seen so far offering GIS products for Linux. Unfortunately, the screenshots they had make their products look ugly as hell, and I can't tell if you can actually edit GIS data with them or just display it. They didn't have any leaflets, but gave me a demo disk that they had hidden under the counter.

    Most of the displays were directed towards IT directors and engineers. There was very little there for desktop users. The KDE booth promoted Kolf, which kicks ass. There is a Knoppix for Kids distro which I haven't tried out yet. There is also a Knoppix DVD which includes more programs than the CD distro.

    The Zynot Foundation (the Gentoo fork) was totally unprepared. They bought themselves a booth and didn't know what to do with it, so you basically had two guys sitting in the back of the booth playing with their laptops while people would intermittently come by and ask "Who are you?".

    There was nothing from VA/OSDN/Sourceforge/Slashdot. I don't think CmdrTaco and crew even made it. I miss the old "relax and have fun" party-like attitude at previous conventions where Slashdot would be showing anime and you could deathmath other attendees at the Red Hat booth. A little of that stayed on in the Gentoo booth, which was showing off an RPG and the most crudely drawn anime I have ever seen (it looked like those Conan O'Brien sketches where he takes a picture of a celebrity and makes the mouth move). The booth was in an aisleway, though, so you couldn't actually sit down to watch the movie or play the game.

    Copyleft did have two rest areas with their Penelope Penguin cartoons. In one of them, Penelope asks "where is Brian Aker when you need him?" Who the hell is Brian Aker, I thought. Turn the corner, see a nerdish fellow with long hair, look at his nametag: "Brian Aker / MySQL Developer". That answers that question. As far as other celebrities go, Bruce Perens was there but I didn't see anyone else whose name I was familiar with.

    Now I have this big pile of propaganda on the kitchen table to go through and read.

    1. Re:A visitor's wrapup by Arandir · · Score: 1

      As far as other celebrities go, Bruce Perens was there...

      With black slacks and button-down white shirt. I would have fainted in shock but for the sugar rush I was having from the Microsoft Jelly Bellies.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  24. Classy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the duct tape adds that extra bit of class to an already mature action! Next time at least use double-sided tape.

  25. Looking Glass by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    Tell me more about looking glass. It sounds very interesting. I've been looking forward to a 3D desktop for some time. It honestly seems like the natural progression. So far I think by far the best concept is croquet, but it seems so far from becoming something as runnable as today's linux desktops that something like looking glass, backed by a major company really catches my eye. Hopefully it is what croquet will be.

    --
    I do security
  26. SuSE rocks by fo0bar · · Score: 4, Funny

    SuSE happened to have their area right next to Microsoft's. I attended a presentation for Openexchange (SuSE's answer to Microsoft Exchange). The presenter would occasionally say things like "and later I'll explain how Openexchange saves you money over SOME OTHER GROUPWARE PRODUCT WHO SHALL REMAIN NAMELESS", while staring at the Microsoft guys.

    In the end I received a Geeko plush toy and a copy of their boxed professional desktop product. Yaaa swag.

    1. Re:SuSE rocks by finallyHasANickname · · Score: 1

      Yessssssssssss! ^5 Way ta go! :-)

  27. Interesting to see Sun's VP missing the point... by Queuetue · · Score: 1

    And doing it right in public, so everyone knows he's clueless.

    "The thing I worry about most with the open source community is the sentiment that open source is somehow different. It isn't," he said.

    They like linux because somehow, the gods smiled upon it, and somehow - by magic - it's "better and it's cheaper". By adopting this attitude, you can see that they miss th eentire point - that Linux is cheaper and better because it's free, not in spite of it.

    They show that if success in the IT world ever comes down to who can deploy, support and enhance Linux the best, IBM will wind up eating thier lunch, because they at least know when to keep thier mouths shut, and also know when to defer to an actual Linux company when necessary. Jonathan Schwartz may be disapointed to discover fairly soon that not only open source development is "different." The entire industry is "different" and Sun's not keeping up.

    The globalization of IT is forcing the best of breed to appear from the U.S. technology sector, and I suspect it's similar in Europe. Those of us who are surviving have to show adaptability, flexibility, and a to-the-bone cost effectiveness that precludes both proprietary technologies and goofy language suites that are only popular because your CEO wants to beat another CEO and spent billions of dollars marketing them.

    I've come to some realizations lately, and it's made me a better developer and admin. If I can't fix it, I won't use it -- everything breaks, and it costs too much to route around a piece of broken black box. If it can't be used to serve multiple purposes, I can't use it -- it costs too much to learn one-shot technologies, and even more to try and force generalization from them.

    The freedom that open source provides makes it possible for me to adopt these two important stances, while providing customer satisfaction, the very best business value, and lower prices than my competition.

    Sun does not live in that world of "better, cheaper, faster" and as long as thier VPs continue to announce they don't get it, I'll look for my tech elsewhere.

  28. eWeek article by wdebruij · · Score: 1

    eWeek also runs an article on MadHatter and LookingGlass:

    link here

    does anyone know of photo's of the GUI?

  29. Re:FIRST POST: A HAIKU FOR YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you fail it !

    asshat !

  30. Centibots by show+me · · Score: 1

    Anyone see Minority Report?

  31. Other way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Linux creator Linus Torvalds may be the main mouthpiece for open source, but another open-source evangelist-John "Maddog" Hall-is working hard behind the scenes to spread adoption of Linux.

    I would say that Maddog is the "main mouthpiece" of OSS, and that Linus is the one who works behind the scenes.

    References
    [1] Attended a talk by Maddog earlier this year. (Believe me, he enjoys talking)
    [2] Read "Just for Fun", Linus' autobiography

  32. Re:sounds like: indeed they are... by panurge · · Score: 1
    Quite right. And as a fan of the work of the Reverend Charles Dodgson, aka Lewis Carroll, who was a hot stuff mathematician as well as a great fantasy writer, I'm delighted Sun is going to to be giving him prominence in this way.

    For the few who don't know, Dodgson was in some ways the Douglas Adams of his day - the ideas in Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass are as linked to cutting edge science of the day, and as riddled with social comment, as the Hitchhiker's Guide series. Dodgson was also a 19th C uber-geek, being a photographer of the sort that made his own photographic plates. In the absence of databases, he developed a cross referencing system for all his correspondence so he could keep track of everything. I guess he was born about a hundred and fifty years too early, but for which he would probably have been something like Chief Scientist at Google. He's a wonderful choice for names for elements of Sun's new desktop paradigm.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  33. Re:sounds like: indeed they are... by show+me · · Score: 1

    Yes, he would fit in very well today. His favorite photo subject was naked little girls.

  34. Linux World CE by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Is that like Windows CE, only better?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  35. Looking Glass == useless eye candy by GringoGoiano · · Score: 1

    I was at the keynote where Mr. Schwartz demonstrated the Looking Glass desktop. The major points:

    • the desktop was actually a view into a 3-D environment, in this case a look at the sky through a tree branch and leaves
    • as you moved the mouse around the desktop the background shifted ever so slightly to make it look like your viewpoint was tracking in 3D also
    • instead of having minimized 2D icons on the toolbar, you had 2D versions of the window contents in the same general area icons would be, set at a weird angle
    • windows on the desktop were sort of translucent, you could see the background/other windows beyond them (opacity probably configurable)
    • instead of minimizing windows you could anchor them to the left/right sides of the screen, where the would shrink a bit and pivot around the left/right edge away from the user to take up less real estate on the desktop
    • you could of course unanchor these screens and bring them into the "foreground"
    • you could also rotate the set of "foreground" windows and look at them from any angle

    That pretty much was the revolution of Looking Glass. There were gasps of wonderment and plenty of glee in the audience. Reminds me of when people were going to walk around in 3D chat environments and talk to each other in real virtual rooms. As for improving productivity or ease of desktop use, there's no hope here, it's just a bunch of useless eye candy.

    If the keyboard and mouse are still the main input devices for a computer, you're much better off with switching virtual desktops and Alt+Tab and Alt+Shift+Tab. If you're shooting for Minority Report style stuff, I still think a layered/switchable mainly 2D with lots of semanticky associations will do better than a 3D environment.

  36. Re:sounds like: indeed they are... by panurge · · Score: 1
    I could write at length about that...but who would read it? The truth is a great deal more complex. It's worth making three short points:
    • Victorian upper class attitude to young children - Dodgson was part of the culture
    • Parents always present
    • Everybody knew what he was doing- his pictures were publicly exhibited.
    Like most geeks, Dodgson had some major hangups, but they were not as crude as you seem to want to make out.
    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  37. Re:Looking Glass (in high res) by gulker · · Score: 1

    Direct link to the Looking Glass post... and a hi-res version of the jpg (it's a time exposure made from my seat of the projection screen... mileage may vary etc.)... just for /. comments readers.

    --
    Rules? We have no rules. We're trying to accomplish something. - Thomas Edsion
  38. Strange concept of 'truth' by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I have fewer problems with linux and bsd then i have with XP. Its as simple as that.

    As a disclaimer i support approx 10000 users that are mostly running XP, as does one of my workstations.

    The stablity of the XP machine is somehwat less then my other BSD based workstation. They use identical hardware.

    I do admit however, as windows 2000 ( both server and workstation ) matured, it was useable and not THAT much worse, but in pure numbers *nix is still more stable if managed properly.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----