Slashdot Mirror


Superconductors as Electrical Grid Surge Suppressors

securitas writes "The New York Times published a story about Intermagnetics -- a company that plans to use 'superconductors as valves on the electric-utility power grid, letting their temperature rise to choke off the flow of power,' a day before the largest blackout in North American history. The timing couldn't have been better. On the day of the blackout, Intermagnetics announced a $6 million contract from the Department of Energy to develop and install superconductor 'valve' prototypes by 2006 in the Niagara Mohawk distribution system. Considering that one of the leading theories for the cause of the cascading blackout is a surge in the Niagara Mohawk power grid, this announcement seems incredibly timely."

162 comments

  1. I must say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    those bastards!

    nic.

  2. Linux by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's one thing I like about my Linux hardware -- almost all of it uses less power than its proprietary counterpart.

    Actually conserving power instead of upgrading the power grids is an underrated option. We need to customize our appliances better, and in some cases, Linux might very well be the answer.

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:Linux by kwenda · · Score: 1

      That's one thing I like about my Linux hardware -- almost all of it uses less power than its proprietary counterpart.

      What, pray tell, is "linux hardware"? If you're talking about your PC that's running linux, then you're not talking about linux hardware, you're talking about hardware that's running linux. And I fail to see how hardware running linux is going to use markedly more or less power than hardware running any other operating system.

    2. Re:Linux by mopslik · · Score: 2, Funny

      I fail to see how hardware running linux is going to use markedly more or less power than hardware running any other operating system.

      Actually, Windows requires less energy to run, since users spend half their time powering down and rebooting.

    3. Re:Linux by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Just like starting a car, more power is required to start a computer than to run it. Especially if you end up with un-used hardware that can be powered down.

    4. Re:Linux by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      Not that I want to ruin a perfectly boring anti-MS joke, but I think rebooting requires *MORE* power on average than just running in waiting-for-user-input mode. Especially when it's a hard reboot, where the harddisk has to spin up etc.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    5. Re:Linux by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Not that I want to ruin a perfectly boring anti-MS joke...

      ...and yet you did! Good show, chap.

  3. Coincidence? by psyconaut · · Score: 0

    Or sabbotage? ;-)

    -psy

    1. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey man, you've gotta be more subtle. Like this example from a Vulcan babe:

      "Four hundred years ago, workers on the planet Earth, fearful of automation replacing their jobs, threw wooden shoes, called sabot, into the machines to stop them, hence the word...
      sabotage."

    2. Re:Coincidence? by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Give it a rest with the conspiracy theories and the 'if only we can link microsoft to this' nonsense. There were known problems with the grid so obviously its management would have been looking for solutions to resolve this. In this case its not like they destroyed the power grid becasue they have a fix waiting, the technology still has to be developed fully.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Coincidence? by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      The winky (";-)") indicates it was a JOKE. Where's your sense of humour?

      I still have a sense of humour and I'm in a city that's still technically in a "State of Emergency", has water problems related to the power outage, and has no reasonably priced or available gas for cars ;-)

      As for the transmission system, yes...needs updating....especially on the U.S. side. The sole reason that Quebec was isolated was because of the multi-billion dollar upgrades that took place after the '98 ice storm....

      -psy

    4. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      called sabot, into the machines to stop them

      And these days US/Israeli tanks carrying sabot rounds attack sovereign nations and freedom loving people. Fits the bill.

    5. Re:Coincidence? by gooru · · Score: 1

      Definitely a conspiracy. Run for your lives!

    6. Re:Coincidence? by uncoveror · · Score: 2, Funny

      It wasn't Microsoft. It was the Zhti Ti Kofft. Put on your tinfoil hat!

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  4. Scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is the SEC investigating this company yet? What a coincidence that a blackout occurs the day after their announcement...

  5. Would seem to have the potential to make it worse by sphealey · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Interesting technology, but it would seem to have the potential to make things worse due to the high instantaneous current that such a storage device could inject into the grid. Once the system starts oscillating (for whatever reason) it is the protective devices add to the oscillation as each attempts to protect their part of the grid.

    It seems to me we need more synchronous condensers to absorb fluctuations, not more protective devices.

    sPh

  6. Welcome our New Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one welcome our new superconducting overlords.

  7. NYTimes name change by duvel · · Score: 4, Funny
    > The New York Times published a story ........... a day before the largest blackout in North American history

    In related news, NYTimes is considering a namechange to NYFutureTimes

    --

    I have a photographic memory for numbers. I know almost a hundred of them.

    1. Re:NYTimes name change by in7ane · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there something about future articles being blocked out in robot files at NYT? And death announcement articles form the 'future' (pre written) being searchable via Google?

      Somebody post the link(s)...

  8. Hmm. by xenoweeno · · Score: 4, Funny

    this announcement seems incredibly timely.

    A little too timely.

    /me twirls handlebar moustache

  9. Coil cure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So whatever happen to using plain old inductors as suppressors?

  10. Problems by JamesP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know how is this supossed to work.

    Ok, so you can have a very tiny wire, that when superconductiong can carry several amperes... But if it heats and looses its superconductivity, it would just break like a fuse...

    I mean, why not use a regular fuse??

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    1. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuses are too slow

    2. Re:Problems by Al-Hala · · Score: 4, Informative

      Given the amount of power flowing through these lines, you cannot use a normal or even semi-normal fuse.

      A fuse works by breaking the conductor path, stopping the current flow. At high currents and voltages, the breakpoint will heat up, ionize, and provide a LOW impedence path, which is difficult to break.

      Some devices that are used to interrupt mains current are switches with contacts immersed in heavy oils, those that use an air blast to disperse the ionized air path, and other more exotic systems.

    3. Re:Problems by shaitand · · Score: 1

      hmm we're talking several gigawatts here when operating PROPERLY, that's a hell of fuse.

    4. Re:Problems by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

      It's in liquid nitrogen, so it'd be kept fairly cool. I would imagine that the amount of current needed to "Break" the device is more than the transmission lines would ever be subjected to, even during a fault.

    5. Re:Problems by mikewolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well, if you would just RTFA.

      from the article "the surge is so large that it will arc across the circuit breaker's contacts, defeating its purpose."

      From what i can tell, you can only allow so much power to go through circuit breakers, otherwise it could arc across the breaker. With these new superconducting switches, you can push more energy through the grid.

      "Allowing larger electricity flows through substations without fear of overpowering the circuit breakers would let power companies move more energy through the grid."

      its amazing how much reading an article makes talking about it easier...

    6. Re:Problems by menscher · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, the problem is that when the device *does* break, it heats up a LOT. That means that the liquid nitrogen is no longer a liquid. It vaporizes so quickly that you have to have a pressure-release valve to avoid an explosion. Assuming your device doesn't melt, cooling it back down again is a lenghly process.

      They have these sorts of issues at particle accelerators, like at Fermilab.

    7. Re:Problems by theMightyE · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Actually, the problem is that when the device *does* break, it heats up a LOT. That means that the liquid nitrogen is no longer a liquid. It vaporizes so quickly that you have to have a pressure-release valve to avoid an explosion. Assuming your device doesn't melt, cooling it back down again is a lenghly process.

      Very true - as a student I used to work at a superconductor research lab that did this kind of work. We would run 100kA through a superconducting coil cooled with liquid nitrogen as part of our experiments, creating a magnetic field with about 3 megaJoules of stored energy. One day a tech mis-wired part of a safety circuit that was used to dump the energy at the end of the experiment run (and then very nicely faked his check-off sheet afterward), and the superconductor heated up so fast it vaporized the one inch aluminum stabalizing rod it was attached to as well as several hundred gallons of liquid He. A nine inch port blew out of the top venting all the (now gasseous) helium into the lab and we all ran like hell to avoid being smothered by the sudden lack of O2 in the room.

      Nobody got injured (except the tech, who got fired), but I couldn't help but think about the alternate scenario where the lab staff somehow got trapped inside the room, and the last thing I'd hear before passing out would be "We're all gonna die!" in a Mickey Mouse helium voice.

    8. Re:Problems by Euler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Besides the issue with interrupting high currents, this superconductor would help to keep power plants from tripping offline in the first place. When working with very high power, it is difficult to build regulators that can handle enough power. Switches/breakers are much easier to build, but they are only on-off. The superconductor apparently allows for some current regulation by varying the external magnetic fields.

      Power plants trip offline because they have only 2 choices: stay online and fry, or go offline and screw all the other plants into taking more burden. This superconductor gives a much better 3rd option: stay online, but only supply the rated capacity of the power plant.

  11. Fancy gadgets will help? by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
    They were supposed to have protection systems to prevent a cascade failure like this. Making the protection systems fancier isn't going to help too much if they don't install/maintain them properly.

    Or as Kosh said, "Once the blackout begins, it is too late to order pizza."

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Fancy gadgets will help? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Making the protection systems fancier isn't going to help too much if they don't install/maintain them properly.

      This is not a simple matter of making the protection systems fancier... this is a fundamentally different approach to preventing cascade failure. It's orders of magnitude more robust (no arcing current, etc, as mentioned in the article) and there is no good reason why we shouldnt' have more robust systems.

      These sort of things won't all be maintained properly, however it is my hope that after this blackout the maintainence system is revised to minimize negligence. Having these systems installed will help the well-maintained stations not suffer due to the problems of the ill-maintained... It makes the whole system much fairer and could possibly save a lot of money in the long run.

      I also think that advancing superconducting technology is worth this effort alone, as it is a very promising field. A superconducting electric motor for an electric car would only have to be the size of a softball (extremely high magnetic field densities, and of course efficencies). Superconductors are being used in better bandpass filters for things like cellular telephone transceiver towers and possibly even space missions. Superconductors are also used for experiments with NMR quantum computing, and may hold the key to confined fusion (yes, a long way off I know).

      You are correct that there is an issue to be addressed with maintainence, however I cannot see how this could do anything but help the situation.

      Cheers,
      Justin

      P.S. Nice Kosh quote!

    2. Re:Fancy gadgets will help? by mkweise · · Score: 4, Informative

      They were supposed to have protection systems to prevent a cascade failure like this. Making the protection systems fancier isn't going to help too much if they don't install/maintain them properly.

      Actually, the primary purpose of the protection systems in place is to prevent grid trouble from physically destroying generators, transformers, transmission lines and other infrastructure hardware. And they worked, otherwise it would have taken weeks rather than hours to get the grid up again. IIRC, in the blackout of 1965>, major infrastructure damage resulted from a grid collapse and it was from this experince that many of the currently implemeted ideas were learned.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
    3. Re:Fancy gadgets will help? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Oh , I don't know about the maintenance - if you don't maintain a superconducting fuse widget (eg keep it cold.... er what else is there?) , I suspect that it'd stop working pretty quickly.

      This is opposed to 'normal' protection devices that fail to actuate when broken, a superconducting thingo would actuate when broken.

      (Notice my use of the technical terms 'widget' and 'thingo', and bow down to my enormous knowledge on the subject ;-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    4. Re:Fancy gadgets will help? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      Oh , I don't know about the maintenance - if you don't maintain a superconducting fuse widget (eg keep it cold.... er what else is there?) , I suspect that it'd stop working pretty quickly. This is opposed to 'normal' protection devices that fail to actuate when broken, a superconducting thingo would actuate when broken.

      Wow, that's actually a very good point. I think though that your conclusion is exactly opposite of what it should be, however... Think of it this way: It is my experience that in large beaurocratic systems, things don't get fixed/done unless there's a problem. Poorly maintained breakers, etc, don't usually cause problems (they only cause problems in an emergency, by which time it's too late!) so they don't get much attention. There's plenty of attention on things when a distaster strikes (like a power outage)... You can bet people would get fired if these new superconducting "widgets" (as you called them) stop functioning during normal operations often. This means they will be properly maintained and thus more likely to work when tehre IS an emergency. Same reason that backup generators that are used often are maintained better than those that are rarely used.

      So it'd seem to me that while you point out an exccelent difference, it actually works oppositely of how you think. A very cool inisight nevertheless.

      (Notice my use of the technical terms 'widget' and 'thingo', and bow down to my enormous knowledge on the subject ;-)

      At least you're not afraid to jokingly admit you're not an expert... Hell, I have 3 years of Physics at Cornell University and work for NASA doing software engineering, but that doesn't make me an expert about power grid stuff... Although I do understand most of the physics :-D

      Cheers,
      Justin

  12. Jayson Blair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the byline was by Jayson Blair, the blackout story in the NYT reported the blackout mostly hit Nevada, and was caused by the army of Alexander the Great.

  13. +1 Obvious by holt_rpi · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    Allowing larger electricity flows through substations without fear of overpowering the circuit breakers would let power companies move more energy through the grid, Mr. Pellegrino said. That is a major goal of the government and private companies, because new power lines are hard to build.
    Well DUH...
  14. Timely?.. by levik · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually, it seems very untimely to me... Like the announcement about installing bulletproof doors in jet liners two days after 9/11.

    Where were they three days ago, I wonder?

    --
    Ñ'
    1. Re:Timely?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it seems very untimely to me... Like the announcement about installing bulletproof doors in jet liners two days after 9/11.

      Yeah, bulletproof doors would've really helped against those box cutters.

    2. Re:Timely?.. by Threni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Yeah, bulletproof doors would've really helped against those box cutters"

      Uh...yeah. They'd have meant that there'd have been no way they could get into the cockpit, so the worst that could happen would be everyone on the plane except the crew dying, which would have reduced the death toll by 99%.

    3. Re:Timely?.. by signe · · Score: 1, Troll

      Read the goddamn summary, if nothing else. They announced their product concept the day before the blackout. They got their contract the day of (big surprise there).

      Just when you thought the masses couldn't get any dumber, along comes someone like you.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    4. Re:Timely?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying they wanted to test the stuff out which is the actual cause of this blackout? :)

      Ok, ok. I'm going to read the article now.

    5. Re:Timely?.. by afidel · · Score: 1

      No, it would have reduced the death toll by about 90% assuming total loss of crew, passengers, and hijackers. The final death toll from 9/11 was only 2,819 according to the medical examiners reports from NY and Washington, of those 240 were aboard the airliners. To me the amazing thing is how few lives were lost. The twin towers alone hosted around 6,500 people daily, then there was the Pentagon offices which were mostly under construction at the time, etc. Still the origional poster WAS wrong, grenade resistant doors would have helped, but I think going forward they won't be nearly as effective as the non-passive passengers will be. No major US airline will be sucessfully hijacked within a generation because the passengers will NOT sit back and let it happen, in the past they did because that is what they were told to do and it was generally good advice, the hijackers made a political statement, got some people out of jail or whatever and then gave themselves up. Now everyone aboard will be fearing for their friends and loved ones so they will fight to the last man/woman.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Timely?.. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Bulletproof doors would not have stopped the hijackings. The hijackers succeeded because they were threatening and killing the passengers, not because they could shoot the pilots. The pilots, pre-911, would have opened the doors if the flight crew and passengers were being threatened. Of course, today pilots would not open the doors -- but that is because of 911. The hijackers succeeded because no one had tried what they were doing: slamming the planes into targets. Pilots would cooperate before 911. Now they won't.

  15. Re:Would seem to have the potential to make it wor by siliconwafer · · Score: 5, Informative

    How is this a storage device? It's supposed to increase its resistance when a large, sudden change in current takes place. In other words, it sounds like it would dampen an oscillation. I don't see how it could "inject" current into the grid.

  16. ...AC and DC mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if there were more DC distribution and tranformation points.

    The US-east is mostly a big distributed network.
    You can build an internet by connecting local networks, but without T-1,2,3 but if your neighbors computer restarts you might have tp wait a while before you can reconnect to it.

    1. Re:...AC and DC mix by amembleton · · Score: 1

      On Newsnight, last night there was an interview with an electrical engineer in America who has suggested doing this.

      He suggested that the grid should be split up and then there should be DC inter-connections. Apparantly this would help to reduce surges.

    2. Re:...AC and DC mix by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      He suggested that the grid should be split up and then there should be DC inter-connections. Apparantly this would help to reduce surges.

      Hydro-Quebec, in Canada, already does this ( Google Cache )

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  17. Unfortunatley. by anonymous+coword · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is very difficult to do. Anyone who knows anything beyond EE 101 knows that trying to stop electicity over 30,000 volts is heading for trouble. Unless you have a huge insultor that is at least 500,000 Ohms, the electricty will just jump over it without even slowing down.

    1. Re:Unfortunatley. by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

      And I'm assuming they're going to be using these devices on 345kV, 500kV and 765kV lines.

    2. Re:Unfortunatley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These devices work because superconductors will no longer superconduct when the current density exceeds a certain threshold- when this happens, the superconductor becomes a regular conductor and is subject to I^2R heating.

    3. Re:Unfortunatley. by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyone who knows anything beyond EE 101 knows that trying to stop electicity over 30,000 volts is heading for trouble. Unless you have a huge insultor that is at least 500,000 Ohms, the electricty will just jump over it without even slowing down.

      And anyone who knows any physics knows that that statement is bullshit without some sort of geometrical context.

      Look at all the 350k powerlines out there... You don't see them arcing every day, because it's not voltage the makes the problem, it's electric field strength! These pipes are probably rather long, so the E-field strength that they will be experiencing should be quite small (E-field = potential / distance). The superconductors lose superconductivity during a surge, becoming a resister whose resistance is proportional to temperature. Due to I*R^2 ohmic heating, the resistance will shoot up rather quickly, thus cutting off the surge. Much of the surge's power will be turned into waste heat (I'd hate to have to design that cooling system) but it's much better than the alternative.

      It should also be clarified that arcing occurs precisely because circuit breakers, being mechanical, are not large enough to keep the E-field to a level that won't ionize the surrounding atmosphere (allowing arcing).

      Disclaimer: I'm a year away from my bachelors in Applied Physics.

    4. Re:Unfortunatley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, YHBT. Most moderators don't know anything about EE and Physics. They just see buzzwords such as volts, EE 101 and ohms, so I get easy karma for writing bullshit. I am a troll, you have been trolled and I will use my trolling expertise to make slashdot collapse, GNAA, Trollkore, etc are just wnanabes.

    5. Re:Unfortunatley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny... you assume that QuantumFTL is not also playing the system... Arrogantly insulting anyone who posts incorrect scientific information, and watching his karma rise.

      As for trolls, I feel sorry for anyone who feels they need to waste their time in that way. Maybe you should try doing something in the Big Blue Room instead?

    6. Re:Unfortunatley. by tlk+nnr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These devices work because superconductors will no longer superconduct when the current density exceeds a certain threshold- when this happens, the superconductor becomes a regular conductor and is subject to I^2R heating.

      Not really correct.
      The article mentions that it will be a copper oxide based superconductor - a ceramic. When thresholds are reached, then the superconductor becomes an isolator. No danger of arcing, because there is no air that could be ionized.
      The threshold that they want to use is not the current or heat theshold, they want to use the magnetic threshold: Strong electromagnets are placed around the superconductor, and if the magnets are being turned on, then the conductivity falls to 0.
    7. Re:Unfortunatley. by gotak · · Score: 1

      Stop the finger pointing and stand up with your freaking user name you cowards. Like the man/woman/dog/thingie that you are.

    8. Re:Unfortunatley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you have a huge insultor that is at least 500,000 Ohms
      i find goatse.cx hugely insulting, at least to my eyes. maybe it would work ?

      ooh... insulator as in resistor? nevermind...

  18. Magnetic "Shut off"? by KRL · · Score: 0

    I don't get it... magnetic fields don't penetrate superconductors. So how is a field "bath" supposed to limit the current? From what I remember of my Solid State Physics class, magnetic fields don't penetrate more than a fraction of an atoms length into the material.

    1. Re:Magnetic "Shut off"? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Ordinarily you're right. A superconductor will set up countercurrents and expel an externally applied magetic field. This is the Meissner effect.

      Unless the magnetic field intensity reaches a certain threshold. In a Type II superconductor, the field may penetrate the superconductor by organizing itself into thin "flux bundles" or vortices, each carrying a discrete amount of flux equal to h/2e. These penetrate the superconductor like millions of little needles. In fact, they arrange themselves in a regular periodic array like a 2-D lattice. And if you increase the temperature of the material enough, this "crystal" undergoes a phase transition- it "melts"- and the vortices can flow past each other like a liquid! (The "melting" point of a flux-bundle crystal is not to be confused with the superconductor's critical temperature, Tc.)

      Strengthening the external field will increase the density of vortices. The conduction electrons moving through the superconductor encounter them, and the field inside them exerts a JxB force on the current. By Newton's Third Law, the vortices themselves experience an equal and opposite force, called the Lorentz force. They have some mobility, so the current effectively pushes them sideways through the superconductor. (This motion is called "creep", and it can be slowed down by superconductor impurities- since the vortices can become "pinned" to defects in the material.) But this means we have time-varying magnetic fields. By Faraday's Law we now have an induced electric field antiparallel to the current. This means the system has nonzero longitudinal dissipative resistivity- you have to exert a force to push the current through and thus the superconductivity is destroyed.

      Generally this is considered a bad thing, which is why people add impurities to superconductors so that the vortices are "pinned" in place and do not move. You can make superconductors that can handle much higher currents this way.

  19. Re:Would seem to have the potential to make it wor by sphealey · · Score: 1
    How is this a storage device? It's supposed to increase its resistance when a large, sudden change in current takes place.
    Damm, you are right. I was thinking of the superconducting storage ring technology that EPRI was working on about 10 years ago and thinking it had been commercialized. Wrong application.

    sPh

  20. US electricity consumtion is legendary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know...

    Germany: small country, 80 million people, too much(!) electricity left

    US: super power country, 300 million people, all electricity wasted for SHIT

    Hey, need any electricity? Come to europe.. we'll give you.. you're WELCOME! (really)

    1. Re:US electricity consumtion is legendary! by anonymous+coword · · Score: 1

      You can always outsource your electricty production to the countrys that have to much. Or maybe you can SCRAP YOUR SUV's and walk.

    2. Re:US electricity consumtion is legendary! by Firefly1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Or maybe you can SCRAP YOUR SUV's and walk.
      Objection - relevance; as in 'lack thereof'. Do many cities in the United States need a better public transit plan? Yes. Does this have anything to do with the hardware failure suspected to be at the bottom of the recent unpleasantness? No.
      Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  21. Re:Unfortunately. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    One of the articles points out that this is a problem with most circuit breakers--the current just arcs across the open switch.

    Their gizmo, "a matrix fault current limiter", just increases the resistance without arcing (and a number of parallel circuits to decrease power gradually). I dunno, I don't think I'd want to stand too close to it when it loses superconductivity. Keeping power circuits at 77 K will take some serious cooling!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  22. stock change by jetlag11235 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, I suppose this isn't too surprising, but it isn't every day you see an established company have their stock increase by 17% in one day.

    -- jetlag --

    1. Re:stock change by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      The whole sector gapped up Friday morning. Check out American Superconductor.

  23. Is it just me, or is it a conspiracy .... by leoaugust · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Is it just me, for in this "New" world, everytime I see a coincidence, me thinks conspiracy ....

    If Pigs in Orwell's Animal Farm could start walking on two legs, and a war could be staged for Halliburton to get billions in contracts .... could a power outage have been staged ...

    please spare me the flames; I am already close to dying laughing at my own stupidity ....

    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
    1. Re:Is it just me, or is it a conspiracy .... by Attaturk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it just me, for in this "New" world, everytime I see a coincidence, me thinks conspiracy ....

      To write off one coincidence as a conspiracy theory may be regarded as misguided; to write off more than one coincidence as a conspiracy theory is naivite.

      You are not alone. The fact that we can't trust those in charge any more may have something to do with the lack of accountability and openness.

      The lack of openness could be put down to justified fear, given global opinion of the United States at the moment. There is however no excuse for the lack of accountability. What happens to senior executives and politicians that mess up our lives? They retire with a fat pay-off. Therein lies the problem.

    2. Re:Is it just me, or is it a conspiracy .... by pohl · · Score: 1

      For more coincidence, check out American Superconductor, which just recently had its stock soar with the news that its second-generation high-temp superconductor wire outperformed the predicted estimates. Nice timing for both companies, in the very least.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  24. Yahoo news by DRWHOISME · · Score: 5, Informative

    says the cause of the blackouts were 3 OHIO transmission lines.

    1. Re:Yahoo news by not_a_member_of_parl · · Score: 1

      The root cause is defined as the event that happened, which if didn't happen would have avoided the incident.

      The loss of the 3 Ohio lines appears to be the trigger for the blackout, but not the root cause. Lines trip all the time (a list of the lines that have tripped in Ontario over the past year are listed here... before you flame Ontario, the US list is no better.) Something that happens all the time, by definition, is not the root cause.

      Given that lines trip all the time (and the trigger event of the November 9 1965 blackout was also line trips), the system is supposed to be designed to withstand them. In fact, I initially though the August 14th event was a coordinated terrorist attack because I thought the system was designed to make widespread blackouts impossible! (Un)fortunately, I was wrong.

      The fundamental issue here is why on August 14 some line trips caused a massive loss of power (61 billion watts). The problem should not have affected anyone other than Cleveland (just as the Ontario line trips mentioned at the IEMO website didn't affect anyone other than those nearby).

      The answer to this question will be VERY interesting, and IMHO will be a political bombshell on both sides of the border....

      (I walked home on August 14th. For once I'm happy to pay massive property taxes to live within 8 km of the downtown core of Toronto...)

  25. Lastest new reports: transmission lines in Ohio... by pg133 · · Score: 2, Informative
  26. Larger electricity flows? by Avian+visitor · · Score: 2, Informative
    Allowing larger electricity flows through substations without fear of overpowering the circuit breakers would let power companies move more energy through the grid

    Ccircuit brakers are not limiting the amount of electrical power that can flow through a high-voltage line

    The diameter of cables limits the current and the distance between cables limits the voltage. Lines are designed for a specific capacity. You can't upgrade them only by chaging the breaker.

    Besides, they say that a normal circuit breaker would arc across. What would prevent an arc between the ends of their ceramic rods?

    If they want to use semiconductors, why don't they use them for the entire line? Or for the coils in the generators? That would make a difference, not some circuit brakers...

    1. Re:Larger electricity flows? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What would prevent an arc between the ends of their ceramic rods?

      At a guess, since they "valve" the current rather than just chopping it, they can dampen out the inductive kick that a circuit breaker gets.

      As for using superconductors for the whole line or generator coils, I think they need to keep their switch at 77 K.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Larger electricity flows? by Avian+visitor · · Score: 1, Interesting
      At a guess, since they "valve" the current rather than just chopping it

      I don't believe they can "valve" anything. If you heat superconductor above the critical temperature it loses superconductivity in an instant. They say the material used is made of bismuth, strontium, calcium, copper and oxygen. That is probably some kind of ceramic superconductor. And ceramic superconductors are insulators above critical temperature. That means instant cut off.

      Even if they would somehow manage to gradually increase the resistance of their rods, imagine trying to "valve" a circuit at several 100kV and several 100A with a resistor. You would have enormous power loses on the "valve". No sane amount of liquid nitrogen will be enough to cool that.

      When large currents are involved, there are only two states possible: switched on or off. No valving.

    3. Re:Larger electricity flows? by Al-Hala · · Score: 2, Informative

      Righto!

      Besides, they say that a normal circuit breaker would arc across.

      Absolutely true. Here's a link to an industrial line switch. Keep in mind this is a manually operated and "vanilla" type:
      Vac-Rupter

      What would prevent an arc between the ends of their ceramic rods?

      They'd need to break the arc using compressed air blown across the gap, or by submerging the contacts so the arc couldn't form in the first place.

      If they want to use semiconductors, why don't they use them for the entire line? Or for the coils in the generators? That would make a difference, not some circuit brakers...

      At this level of performance, no semiconductor could handle the power losses. Remember they are SEMI-conductors (not so good as conductors, not so bad as insulators). We use an AC distribution system due to physics: Using transformers, we can up the voltage, while reducing current, to get the same power level.

      The less actual current flowing through a conductor, the less heating of said conductor. The less heating, the thinner/less expensive it can be. Imagine supporting a cable across countries the diameter of a bus.

    4. Re:Larger electricity flows? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I have my doubts too. If a superconductor suddenly converts into a heat-producing wire, I don't see why there isn't an almighty bang as it then converts into plasma. Even a ceramic, conductor one moment, insulator the next would have some heat, I would think. They do say that they use a number of parallel circuits, but...

      Somehow I doubt that this is an installed, tested, and shipping product--good timing on the announcement however. :^P

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Larger electricity flows? by Avian+visitor · · Score: 1
      They'd need to break the arc using compressed air blown across the gap, or by submerging the contacts so the arc couldn't form in the first place.

      That are exactly the countermeasures that are used today on normal circuit breakers. Why then waste millions on technology that doesn't bring any improvement?

      no semiconductor could handle the power losses

      I agree with that. It was a typo. I meant superconductors.

    6. Re:Larger electricity flows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That are exactly the countermeasures that are used today on normal circuit breakers. Why then waste millions on technology that doesn't bring any improvement?

      Those countermeasures aren't necessary with this type of surge protection. Circuit breakers can arc because the contacts are close together as the breaker opens. These rods are long enough that the ends are too far apart to arc. The resistance that is introduced into the system is spread over the length of the rods unlike a circuit breaker where the resistance is introduced in the gap between the contacts the moment the breaker opens.

      Also, unlike a circuit breaker these don't actually break the circuit, they just add resistance to it. They would most likely be used in series with the breakers to suppress small surges without shutting down the system and suppress large surges enough that arcing in the breakers can be prevented when it is necessary to open the circuit.

    7. Re:Larger electricity flows? by gotak · · Score: 1

      I think they are thinking you can bring more lines into a power facility if your facility can be upgraded to handle more power via these new "valves".

      Additionally just because these rods are superconductive in some conditions doesn't mean they are totally non-conductive when they are in other situatons. So in theory you might be able to have a 2 state valve which would allow them to drop the voltage at the existing circuit breakers preventing arcing. The use of these "valve" to aid existing circuit breakers is what this story was about.

    8. Re:Larger electricity flows? by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      What would prevent an arc between the ends of their ceramic rods?
      Possibly the same thing that prevents arcing from the wires to the towers they are attached to.

      Distance.

      The electricity will only arc so far (do to resistance of the air)

  27. Re:Important Announement. by waitigetit · · Score: 0

    by rapevictim (557748)

    Was it as good for you as it was for me?

    --
    I could care less, but not without a lobotomy
  28. This is a good start by Judg3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a great start, especially with the way the power grid is now.
    Essentially right now a surge large enough to damage substations creates a large chain effect, where the incoming substation sees the surge, shuts itself down to protect itself, which adds more power to the surge, which heads down to the next station, which shuts off to keep itself from being blown, which adds more power to the surge, etc etc.

    With a way to contain a large surge into the system, we could prevent blackouts like the one that occured in NYC in 1977 (Exactly because of this reason). In 1977 a summer storm knocked several high-voltage power lines out of order. Because of the suddenly reduced load, the power tried to flow back to the substation, which knew it couldn't handle it and shut down. This added more power to the grid, which was sent to the next station along the line, which shut itself off, etc. This cycle of power overload, substation shut down happened for about 55 mins till it hit the main generators (which, although they could shut themselves down, had no way to offload this excess power down the line) and took them out for 25 hours.

    I said it before, I'll say it again. Get rid of our 30+ year old nuclear reactors (no new orders for units since 1977) and replace them with newer more powerful solutions and second generation solar equipment.
    When reactors are running at 102.41% capacity, it's time for an upgrade.
    We've got the technology now to produce cleaner, safer, more powerful nuclear reactors - but that Three Mile Island paranoia still looms with us I guess.
    Look at European nations, they derive up to 50% of their power from modern nuclear facilites without any problem and no blackouts. The USA? Just 20% of our power comes from Nuclear energy, the rest from coal fired power plants and "peak use" and "daytime use" gas turbine generators.

    Hey, I don't want to live right next door to a huge nuke power plant myself, but if it means cleaner, safer, more reliable power I'd be more then happy to.

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:This is a good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dude, that 102.4% only means that the plant operated more efficiently than normal. The amount of power generated by the core did NOT exceed 100%. However, the generator output exceed the maximum dependaple capability (MDC) as a result of higher conversion efficiency. The MDC is a lower bound on what the plant -as a whole- can reliably deliver to the grid. All it takes to achieve better efficiency is lower than "normal" temperature of circ water to the condenser. This can simply be caused by weather conditions. I've seen nuclear plants whose output could vary by more than 100 MWe over the course of a year, solely due to seasonal changes in ambient temperatures. Lower temperature of heat sink = higher thermal efficiency = higher capacity factor.

    2. Re:This is a good start by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that the fact that no nuclear power plant has been built here in 25 years is a disgrace.

      The only reason I wouldn't want to live next to a nuclear plant is because they keep all the spent uranium in a swimming pool right there. If there were a national waste depository it would be a huge step towards making the whole system work. I can't believe that the DOD and Homeland Security havn't put their foot down and said that we can't have tons of potential dirty bomb material spread all over the country protected by a chain link fence and a rent a cop. No more feasablility studies (which I think at last count have cost a few BILLION dollars), we're just going to build the thing and Greenpeace can sue us for the next 17 years.

      -B

    3. Re:This is a good start by olman · · Score: 1

      No more feasablility studies (which I think at last count have cost a few BILLION dollars), we're just going to build the thing and Greenpeace can sue us for the next 17 years.

      They're insane anyways. Not insane as in schizophernic, insane as in split personality. The only major clean sources of energy we have right now are hydro and nuclear. Please, no more polluting the hell out of our home and pretending it's a-okay since it's not nuclear. It's time to shut down coal and oil plants for good and replace them with nuclear power.

      That's it for the political rant. I'm an engineer. An European engineer. We never-ever have that magnitude grid failure. Sure, we have cities going dark, but the grid can cut off parts of itself to protect distribution down the line. So there's no cascading.

    4. Re:This is a good start by dpletche · · Score: 2, Informative

      Likewise, all that waste is sitting around in pools (though warm as they are, I wouldn't want to swim in them) because Carter signed an executive order banning reprocessing (known as Presidential Directive 8, subsequently reaffirmed as President Clinton's Presidential Directive 13.) There are certainly issues to consider with reprocessing, but it's a fact that we wouldn't have all this nuclear waste lying around if we recycled it into useful component elements.

      Interesting discussion:
      PBS Frontline
      University of Minnesota Technology newsletter

    5. Re:This is a good start by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      I'm an engineer. An European engineer. We never-ever have that magnitude grid failure.

      What about this (search for blackout)? A couple days of snow and winds and France loses power to 10 million citizens and 22,000 pylons fall over. Great engineering. The NE US faces weather like that every year.

      The US and Canada is a huge geographic area populated by nearly 300 million people, supplied by the largest integrated power transmission systems on Earth. Arguably the transmission system in the Northeast of North America is the largest single machine on the planet. Once every 30 years or so we have a massive regional blackout. Big deal. The very next thing that happens is that we get our shit together, build what needs building, and then forget about it for another 30 years.

      Our power transmission grid is old. NIMBY and, to a lessor extent, environmental activism have caused this. Isn't it nice to know we have such concern for the quality of life and environment? Perhaps this latest event in the Northeast will lead to less tolerance for the activists and allow the grid to be upgraded.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    6. Re:This is a good start by LimeColoredSloth · · Score: 1

      The only thing great about the august 14 blackout was that it protected power companies' plants, but it sucked majorly for the consumers. Instead of shutting down powerplants for protection as they did on the 14th, i can think of four other possibilities: 1) build more power plants to meet surge demand (most expensive option) 2) disable powerplants from overloading or shutting down -- just have it perform below (say) 130% all the time, but never over it. 3) make demand meet supply (by blacking out smaller regions, for example just northern Ohio). 4) detect where a short is occuring, disable that line only. But whatever you do, don't reduce supply when the demand is high!

    7. Re:This is a good start by ibbey · · Score: 1

      The only thing great about the august 14 blackout was that it protected power companies' plants, but it sucked majorly for the consumers. Instead of shutting down powerplants for protection as they did on the 14th, i can think of four other possibilities: 1) build more power plants to meet surge demand (most expensive option) 2) disable powerplants from overloading or shutting down -- just have it perform below (say) 130% all the time, but never over it. 3) make demand meet supply (by blacking out smaller regions, for example just northern Ohio). 4) detect where a short is occuring, disable that line only. But whatever you do, don't reduce supply when the demand is high!

      You seem to be implying that the blackout was intentional. It wasn't. Your point #4 in particular is silly. That is the the way the system is supposed to work. Unfortunately, do to a complex set of circumstances, the system didn't work the way it was intended to and the blackout occurred. Perhaps you should read up a bit more on the circumstances of the blackout before you suggest any further solutions?

    8. Re:This is a good start by olman · · Score: 1

      What about this (search for blackout)? A couple days of snow and winds and France loses power to 10 million citizens and 22,000 pylons fall over. Great engineering. The NE US faces weather like that every year.

      Oh yes, famous annual French blizzards.. French have not abolished monopoly on power. All their electricity is produced by a monolithic monopoly corp which is answerable to nobody. We all know how well that sort of thing correlates with quality.

  29. Not Niagara Mohawk's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Niagara Mowhawk customers never lost power. I know this becuase I live there. I doubt it could have been caused by NM because like i said they never lost power.

  30. Bow to me (OT a little) by fusion812 · · Score: 1

    I give it 2 months until Verizon runs the power grid for the east in a joint venture with SBC, GE, and AOL/TimeWarner, with Microsoft running the software that controls the power stations.

    The new company formed will be called SCOnumber2 ultra LLC

    And you will all have to buy licenses at $699 a pop to have electricity run to your home (one license per home).

    "Bow to me" - Gates and friends

  31. Don't come to the UK for electric by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Energy traders, power producers and chemical engineers warned yesterday that the UK could face blackouts on the scale experienced in the US and Canada on Thursday night or substantial disconnections at the very least.

    echo ' http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,101 9996,00.html ' | tr -d ' '

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Don't come to the UK for electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting one thing - a power station called Dinorwig in North Wales.

      It's hydro-electric and runs with generators spinning in air. These can be called on to generate a full 1960MW for around 7 hours. It's sole means for existing is to cope with power surges that can be caused by grid failures and excess usage.

      Sure, it may be able to only run for 7 hours (after which it uses excess energy to pump water back to the top reservoir) but that's a whle lot better than everything rolling into one big cascading failure.

    2. Re:Don't come to the UK for electric by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

      They was actually talking about enforced power cuts, not "accidental" ones like in the US.

      They are talking about enforcing power cuts because we "don't have enough power stations"....although if the real reason is "we don't have enough fuel" then that would certainly explain certain recent occurances.

  32. Re:Lastest new reports: transmission lines in Ohio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Another story fingering First Energy in Ohio not Niagra Mohawk.

    Key sentences : His organization is a nonprofit, industry-sponsored group that is supposed to oversee power line reliability. The council earlier had released documents showing four transmission line problems in the Cleveland area in the hour before the blackout spread Thursday afternoon across eight states from New England to Michigan.

    Not a whole lot of information there.

    Well, let me emphasize, this is a preliminary indication, not the final word. It's just a clue at this point. It could be coincidence; not the cause.

    Furthermore, utilities have localized problems. The big problem is not a small subsection of the grid going down, it's why the problem wasn't isolated. First Energy may be the origin of the problem, but other utilities may not have followed proper procedure to contain the problem.

  33. not like it really matters by beyonddeath · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    the us is already blaming canada

  34. Linux hardware by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    25Mhz 386
    32Mb RAM
    40GB ide
    512k Trident 8900c
    AT case
    100W PSU
    14" EGA Monitor
    10BaseT BNC NIC
    102-Key Keyboard
    No mouse

    and you can probably run it off a couple of AA batteries

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Linux hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes because a couple of AA batteries are highly likely to give out 100W :P

    2. Re:Linux hardware by mkldev · · Score: 1
      Well, you wouldn't get much more work done on a 386 if it were up for a week than you would in a millisecond.... Sounds like a couple of AA batteries just might fill the bill. Use them to charge a large capacitor, then crank that sucker up.... (Warning: kids, don't try this at home.)

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  35. Too little, too late? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

    The day before the grid went down, this was probaly dismissed by the CEO of the powercompanies, politicans and other top brass as 'too expencive' to install.
    Today the very same people are likely to ask people lower down in the system why such a device wasn't installed in the first place.
    Human nature I guess...

    Anyway, there are other systems out there that can prevent a cascading failure like we say in the US now. Trouble is, every system - including the one described in the article - comes with a pricetag and a set of drawbacks. In this cause, I would suspect that keeping the supercondutors superconduting isn't free, neither in money or in energy.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  36. of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the devices were installed outside of NM's grid. i bet if you were just on the other side, you'd be singin' a different tune

  37. All the better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could've spend a few hours in the safe warm darkness of the stable not worrying about visitors and having a good excuse of "watching out for horse thieves" for everyone who could suspect why I spend so much time with the mare...

  38. Re:Lastest new reports: transmission lines in Ohio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Thanks for posting the links. The Niagra-Mohawk theory died a couple hours after the blackout.



    Maybe someone should check their stories a little better before the next time they post a 'leading theory'.

  39. cause not found... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    Considering that one of the leading theories for the cause of the cascading blackout is a surge in the Niagara Mohawk power grid

    This does not appear to be the case anymore...in fact, this seems like very old news...everything I've read suggests that all the interest focuses on Ohio and possibly Michigan...but somewhere in the great lakes [and on a side note, neither state is midwest, midwest doesn't start until central time, why doesn't CNN understand that?] not the N-M system.

    I want to say that the blackout from years ago may have had the N-M system as a factor, so people jumped on that. This is clearly a different power failure.

    1. Re:cause not found... by OtaconX · · Score: 1

      Last night on the news they had power company reps on talking about how it was caused by a line outside of Cincinati, and how if certain stations didn't hold back the cascade, it would've hit the rest of the country.

      People are just quick to blame canada, it's probably the whole french fries and mayo thing.

  40. The fix is to force MaxLoad less than Supply by douglasgodfrey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The fix is to force MaxLoad less than Supply.

    This can be done by replacing the local
    stepdown transformers that convert from
    17KVA Power Lines to the 220/110V 3 Phase
    local Power Lines with saturation mode
    transformers that will not allow more
    than their maximum rated power to pass.

    Power Stations can be protected by
    Superconducting Air Gap Transformers
    that inherently limit the transfer of
    power to the rated capacity of the
    station. Power Stations would then be
    able to stay online through a major
    overload without damage.

    Any major overload or failure of the
    Transmission Grid would cause a brownout
    but would not cause a blackout.

    Any localized overload would cause a
    local browout without causing any
    voltage or current instabilities on the
    high voltage Power Lines.

    1. Re:The fix is to force MaxLoad less than Supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any major overload or failure of the Transmission Grid would cause a brownout but would not cause a blackout.

      Except that blackouts are hugely preferable to brownouts.

      Brownouts can cause unpredictable operation of equipment, and potentially permanent damage to motors e.g. in AC or refrigeration systems.

  41. Just a tutorial by t_allardyce · · Score: 5, Informative

    for all of us who failed electronics/electrical engineering: blackouts for dummys

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  42. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Good God. In the time it took you to write a fucking shell script to show how clever you are in striping out the added space, you could have just used proper fucking HREF tags, you fucknut. I mean, this is a new fucking low in Slashdot stupidity. How fucking hard can these be for you morons? Seriously, I don't get. Its about the most basic form of HTML you can imagine, and yet there are brain dead idiots like yourself that insist that they won't use it and instead dance around the fucking maypoll and write god damn shell scripts instead!

    Watch!
    <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,36 04,1019996,00.html">The Gaurdian</a>

    The Gaurdian

    Whats so hard about this? Even the special school kids from Kuro5hin could manage that. Why can't you?
  43. Intermagnetics hype by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is hype. That technology isn't ready for prime time. Read the paper. The "high temperature superconductor" they're using needs temperatures below that of liquid nitrogen.

    Utilities have been testing various superconductive devices for decades, but nobody has deployed them in volume. Superconducting generators have been built by GE and others, but they only offer an 0.5% efficiency improvement over conventional machines. That's not enough to compensate for the added complexity of running a big machine at cyrogenic temperatures.

    If this technology worked at liquid nitrogen temperatures, it might have a chance. But anything that needs to go colder than that is probably going to be more expensive and less reliable than what's used now. Scroll down to the end of the article and see the comments from utility companies.

    Look who's doing this: General Atomics and LANL, the senior activity centers for over-the-hill bomb designers.

    If room-temperature superconductors are ever developed, all this will change, but right now, this is basically big-budget overclocking.

    1. Re:Intermagnetics hype by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Informative

      uhh hello? I dont know why this is modded to +4 since it's just plain wrong. If you'd actually read the article you linked to and the NYT article you would've known that they're now using BSCCO high temperature superconductors which have critical temperatures well above the boiling point of liquid N2(over 100K).

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    2. Re:Intermagnetics hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      One might think that from a superficial reading, but no. That article says "Each coil is designed to operate at 35K in cold helium gas cooled by a CryoMech AL-125 cryocooler and four specially designed heat exchangers." That's not an easily reached liquid nitrogen temperature, although it's above liquid helium temperatures. Nitrogen liquifies at 77K at 1 atmosphere. This is more like a medium temperature superconducting system.

    3. Re:Intermagnetics hype by ThePackager · · Score: 1

      I am a former employee of Intermagnetics, they've been working on applications of the technology for decades, not like some start-up software gizmoheads, which are the normal moderator-types who've modded-up all sorts of incorrect, false, misleading and plain-old stupid comments here. The device does have applications, and it will take the intelligent development of state of the art materials and systems to insure that this problem can be avoided in the future. The 'breaker' that was announced was a project that has long been in development, as IGC has been working on power transmission solutions for quite a while. Keeping local control power switching devices at LN temperatures isn't that expensive or complicated. Nor is the solution a whacko-labelled conspiracy, as the poorly speeling posters who leap at any suggestion that the CIA had someone killed for revealing the truth. There are many technologies that our system of scientific development, so cost consciously limited, could easily get made, if the engineers (like me) wouldn't get laid off so frequently because jerk-wad managers, who suck off more capital from the economy, who made the bad decisions were laid off instead!!!

      --
      Please have respect for people with different abilities, especially children.
  44. Hmm... Black Out... by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Greg Pallast has some Interesting Comments on the blackout. He cites energy deregulation, passed by George Bush, Sr. under lobbying pressure from Enron (Yes, them again!) Very intersting comments, if true. Politicians and Corporations teaming up to line their own pockets while endangering the public. Nice.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Hmm... Black Out... by Allen+Varney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Palast's piece was invigorating and/or infuriating, regardless of the reader's own politics. I give him a hearty cheer for intent and a solid +5 Flamebait for phrasing his argument in such a way as to polarize everyone reading it. I wanted to say both "Bravo!" and "Can't we all just get along?"

      Bruce Sterling reprinted Palast's ZNet piece in his latest Vridian Note. A typically inflammatory extract:

      "Meanwhile, the deregulation bug made it to New York where Republican Governor George Pataki and his industry-picked utility commissioners ripped the lid off electric bills and relieved my old friends at Niagara Mohawk of the expensive obligation to properly fund the maintenance of the grid system.

      "And the Pataki-Bush Axis of Weasels permitted something that must have former New York governor Roosevelt spinning in his wheelchair in Heaven: They allowed a foreign company, the notoriously incompetent National Grid of England, to buy up NiMo, get rid of 800 workers and pocket most of their wages -- producing a bonus for NiMo stockholders approaching $90 million.

      "Is tonight's black-out a surprise? Heck, no, not to us in the field who've watched Bush's buddies flick the switches across the globe. In Brazil, Houston Industries seized ownership of Rio de Janeiro's electric company. The Texans (aided by their French partners) fired workers, raised prices, cut maintenance expenditures and, CLICK! the juice went out so often the locals now call it, 'Rio Dark.'

      "So too the free-market British buckaroos controlling Niagara Mohawk raised prices, slashed staff, cut maintenance and CLICK! -- New York joins Brazil in the Dark Ages.

      "Californians have found the solution to the deregulation disaster: recall the only governor in the nation with the cojones to stand up to the electricity price fixers. And unlike Arnold Schwarzenegger, Gov. Gray Davis stood alone against the bad guys without using a body double. Davis called Reliant Corp of Houston a pack of 'pirates' -- and now he'll walk the plank for daring to stand up to the Texas marauders.

      "So where's the President? Just before he landed on the deck of the Abe Lincoln, the White House was so concerned about our brave troops facing the foe that they used the cover of war for a new push in Congress for yet more electricity deregulation. This has a certain logic: there's no sense defeating Iraq if a hostile regime remains in California.

      "Sitting in the dark, as my laptop battery runs low, I don't know if the truth about deregulation will ever see the light -- until we change the dim bulb in the White House."

  45. World Wide Electric Grid by 2030 by cyberguyd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Source: Wired Mag September 2003 - paper copy

    Talk about timely articles. The day of the blackout the September issue of Wired was in my mailbox. In this months infop0rn, it describes a plan that Buckminster Fuller dreamed up 30 years ago to connect the world on the same grid. "Electric companies dismissed the notion as pie in the sky - and then proceeded to build such a grid." The article states that all the contries in the Western Hemisphere will be interconnected within the next ten years. About half the countries in the world are interconnected in some way already. Those that aren't connected or can't be is because of a geographical, industrial infrastructure, or politcal nature, ie Cuba, a few contries in Africa like Ethiopia and Sudan and Polynesia, Austrailia, and New Zealand.

    The article says that this should smooth out market spikes when demand is high in one region it is almost certainly to be low in another. The US uses about 3.8E+18 kilowatt hours a year with about 71% of the energy used produced from fossil fuels. The US is also the largets importer of electricity, most likely the majority from Canada which produces about 58% from hydropower. France is the leading producer of electricity from nuclear, about 75%, and Brazil from hydro, about 86%.

  46. "Quenching" a superconductor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Once upon a time, it was discovered that if you cool certain materials below a critical temperature, they lose all resistivity, i.e. superconducting magnets are only superconducting below a certain temperature. Once their temperature exceeds that critical temperature, "quenching" occurs. The resistance suddenly becomes "normal," i.e. dramtically increasing. This can be catastrophic, the temperature and resistance suddenly becoming directly related and both increasing at accelerated rates. All that energy in the magnetic field suddenly becomes heat.

    When I was an undergraduate at Rice University, I got to use the NMR machine in the chemistry department. Essentially, it's a large superconducting magnet that is used to investigate the structure of chemical samples with radio waves.

    The superconductor is contained in a large steel thermos. The inner layers are cooled by liquid helium (4 K), outer layers by liquid nitorgen (78 K). Superconductors are used because a large amount of current can be used, producing a larger magnetic flux, etc. The more powerful the magnet, the easier the determination of structure.

    Every few days the liquid helium and liquid nitrogen would have to be added to maintain the temperature control.

    I was warned that if the magnetic every quenched, it would sound like a freight train. Remaining liquid nitogen or helium would boil and the magnet itself would probably melt. One moment it's a multi-million dollar instrument, the next it's a steam whistle with a heart of worthless slag.

    I was told that if this happened on my watch, I should run to my car, drive to Mexico, and hope the my professor's hitmen never found me.

    Magnets are transported to the location of installation before being cooled and and superconducting is initiated. Once installed, they are precarious to relocate. Major concerns:

    1) slight bumps can disrupt internal structures causing annoying variations in the magnetic field- don't be the chemist who brings a wrench in the room and gets it permanently attached to the side of the container
    2) loss of temperature control - the quenching phenomenon.
    3) a very high-powered magnetic field- you can exactly push down the hallway without causing damage to nearby objects or its own the magetic field

    If this quenching was used to control current, it would have to be carefully controlled to avoid catastrophic damage to the superconductor itself. This seems a nontrivial engineering problem.

  47. For all the conspiracy theorists... by stewby18 · · Score: 1

    In response to all the current and future posts talking about how this is too perfect to be accidental: this is a manufactured coincidence, which is not really coincidental at all.

    At any given moment, there are many, many people working on a given problem. There are surely advances in science and engineering that could be applied to power grid management on a more or less continuous basis. When do we care? Right after a major failure of the power grid. So a story like this only rises to the top when there's something to interest the average person, creating these "amazing" coincidences.

    Go back to your basements and keep working on that bigger and better tin foil hat.

  48. Clean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuclear may be many things. It is (can be) safe. It is concentrated. It is (can be) cheap. It may be the lesser of two evils, but we won't know that for a few thousand years.

    However, "Clean" it is not.

    1. Re:Clean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, "Clean" it is not.

      I'm curious why you say that. For example, clean compared to a coal power plant that produces thousands of tons of coal ash per year, coal which contains minute amounts of radioactive impuries which release more radiation into the environment than a nuclear plant.

    2. Re:Clean? by olman · · Score: 1

      However, "Clean" it is not.

      True, there's some water vapour generated..

      The radioactive waste is not even worth mentioning, a coal plant produces more radioactive particles when you factor in just how much coal dust they put up into the atmosphere. Besides which, the little bit of waste produced is buried into bedrock, not spread over your backyard. (disclaimer: Your goverment may not have a waste disposal facility)

  49. Re:Lastest new reports: transmission lines in Ohio by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't suprise me at ALL. First Energy is the same company that operates the David Bessy nuclear plant that fell into such disrepair that the Federal Energy Commision ordered them not to restart it. The reason was an 8" hole in the reactor containment unit which had been eaten by corrosive acid! Even after the containment cap was replaced the commission was reluctant to allow the plant to restart as there were other worries about the plants safety and self-inspection records. Basically these guys suck and are the definition of what bad things happen when a formerly regulated monopoly is handed free infrastructure and told to make as much money as possible off it with minimal investment in a newly deregulated environment.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  50. Alternate development by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    Link: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-08/vt- nsp081403.php
    Semiconductor Emitter Turn-off (ETO) thyristor has similar properties with significantly decreased costs, above linked. When it is closed, it is capable conduction 10,000 amps of current in non permanent setting. In permanent installation, 1,500 amps could be conducted within interval below 125 degrees C. Advantage further in frequency possible, to 3 kHz from 60hz, permitting more efficient operation of motors at specific VA.

  51. Re:Settle down! by Nex · · Score: 0

    Correct. Because the entire world is continually reading US-based text. Stop going to US sites, stop allowing your local media to concentrate on North American affairs and you'll be fine, but first of all, Stop Sniveling. Nex

  52. Nothing to do with the recent blackout by grumio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These devices don't have much to do with the recent US blackouts. They are intended to help manage high short circuit currents in electricity transmission and distribution networks.

    As electricity transmission networks grow larger and more interconnected, the current that flows following a short circuit also grows. The maximum level of this short circuit current is a critical parameter when selecting circuit breakers, as all circuit breakers you have must be rated to interrupt the highest possible level of short circuit current that can occur. As transmission networks get larger, eventually you begin reaching circuit breaker short circuit ratings, and the fun begins. You can either start wholesale replacement of your circuit breakers at around $100-200k each, depending on the voltage, or you start splitting up your transmission network to reduce maximum short circuit currents.

    What the devices in this article are intended to do reduce short circuit currents, without affecting normal load current. Under normal load conditions they will behave as a super conductor, but under fault current conditions they will rapidly revert to a high resistance, and hence reduce to fault currents to within circuit breaker ratings.

    Unfortunately the 'liquid nitrogen' aspect of them makes them impractical for real world, large-scale use. Power transmission equipment routinely has uptimes measured in years (recent blackouts excepted of course), and until room temperature, uncooled superconductors come along, I believe this technology is unlikely to be more than an academic curiosity.

  53. Superconductors can have serious drawbacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Interesting stuff, i am working at CERN (european particle physics facility)in a division that is designing system to make sure
    the superconductors do not quench. The problem
    is that most likely the superconductors will
    burn very fast and destroying everything around them.

    This is very serious here as the beam would no longer be bent around the ring and would therefore burn a lot of other stuff and make the tunnels extremely radioactive(it already has to cool for two weeks just from synchrotron radiation before people can go down there).

    I think the most impressive thing is the interconnection of the superconducting wires and the regular power lines. In comes this enourmous cable as thick as my torso(i am 2m 120 kg) into a large metal contraption, which simply makes sure that all wires have a very large connection area and out goes this little thin wire that looks like a halfwidth ata100 cable.

    1. Re:Superconductors can have serious drawbacks by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      hi can you explain more about the "has to cool for two weeks just from synchrotron radiation" part you were talking about? I thought that the synchrotron radiation would dissapear the instant the beam does since it's only photons......?

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    2. Re:Superconductors can have serious drawbacks by anubi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The only thing that concerns me is these things are terribly nonlinear. Once you get a hot-spot resulting from the transition from zero to normal resistance, you will get tremendous dissipation in that one spot. These rods don't appear to be all that big.. I wonder which would have more energy in it, the stored rotational energy of a large hydroelelectric dynamo, or a good-sized stick of TNT?

      They are cooling them with liquid nitrogen... if you dump a helluva lot of energy into it, you get a phase change into gas. Gas doesn't conduct heat very well, so formation of gas bubbles on the rods could have really unusual nonlinear thermal effects.

      They are using magnetic triggers.. with the amount of current which will be supposedly flowing in these conductors, there will be a lot of stray magnetic gradients in the vicinity. Its gonna be a good work of art to ensure your magnetic trigger pulse will be uniform across the "melt-cast" conductors so they drop out of superconductivity gracefully.

      They switch in a fraction of a second.. will a thunderstorm strike set it off?

      Right now, I am quite ignorant of the technology, so don't take anything I say seriously.. its just I am aware there is a helluva lot of energy that they are dealing with. This does not look like an easy engineering problem. If they can pull this off, they've definitely earned their pay.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    3. Re:Superconductors can have serious drawbacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, the synchrotron radiation has of course dissappeared, but the walls and anything else down there has been subjected to massive doses of
      gamma radiation. This will lead to atoms having
      their electrons knocked of creating beta-radiation, which in turn will lead to nucleosynthesis of atoms in the surrounding
      material. Creating radioactive isotopes.

      ps. 10 minutes down there when the beam is running and you are toast, and i am only
      talking about the SPS ring, the booster ring
      for the LHC, running at about a 1/1000 of the
      LHC when it is finished in 2007.

  54. Re:Are you UNCIRCUMCISED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the troll, you would notice that the poster claimed to be female.

  55. Feasability studies... by sllim · · Score: 1

    I tend to think that feasability studies are ways for politicians to put off projects that may or may not benefit them.

    Where I live they wanted to build a bypass of a busy inner-city road.

    They spent 3 years doing a feasibility study.
    Based on what they learned from the feasability study they decided against the bypass.

    The total cost of the 'study' was nearly 3 times the projected cost of doing the bypass.

    What is wrong with this picture?

  56. what in the heck is your deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really i would like to know... are you drunk? you never make any sense...

  57. Re:I must say...Y2K planned for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Year 2000 testing planned for *Just * this.
    Boy's - the infrastructure , and disaster plans were there 3 years ago.
    Electricity systems must be balanced.
    If a GM plant sucking huge gobs of power is 'cut', generator plants pumping energy in also have a major problem, and in cascade style, can fall over too.
    There are electronic 'breakers',that will kick in, automatically.
    The WTC event proved those in charge had a working contingency plan. Smaller electricity concerns have an incentive, not to tell the bigger fish their load variances.
    In Australia, the failure of these trip breakers was simulated, as a Y2K bug was found in them, that prevented remote restart AFTER a 'real' break. The point is, the Y2K lessons have not been learnt, and disaster recovery cut because it is a cost, and no longer trendy . Well, this penny pinching just proved a point.
    Dont expect the results of the investigation to be published, just as when New Zealand's cables 'melted'.

  58. regulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got an idea how we can stop this happening.
    REGULATE the damn utility system, and kick out the British from owning Niagra Mohawk (the first thing they did when they bought NiMo is to fire 800 workers).

  59. Here's how it could make it better by ebuck · · Score: 1

    The power generation facilities are not exactly delicate; however, the are prone to destruction when electrical voltages get way out of range.

    To protect the generation facility, they have sensors which automatically disconnect should a surge come along with "that generator's name on it". If big surges like this had to go through a portion of the circut which increase resistance, thus "leveling out" the spike, the generator may not need to disconnect to protect it's equipment.

    It wouldn't have helped the Niagra Mowhawk situation much, as it's just in the beginning stages, and these things can take years to be built, test, installed, and fully operational.

    1. Re:Here's how it could make it better by astar · · Score: 1
      [source: New York Times, Aug 14; Intermagnetics General; files]

      TECHNOLOGIES, SUCH AS SUPERCONDUCTING, HAVE BEEN, AND ARE, AVAILABLE TO PREVENT WIDESPREAD OUTAGES. If any of the advanced superconducting technologies, some of which have been under development for 20 years, had been in place on Aug. 14, it is doubtful that an instability in a transmission line would have resulted in cascading outages, blacking out 50 million people.

      In the 1970s, Brookhaven National Labs in New York undertook extensive studies on the benefits of deploying superconducting cables to replace copper wires. (Fusion magazine first covered this technology in 1979). Today, nearly 10% of the electricity generated is lost by the dissipation of energy as heat, through the transmission wires, and the longer the trip, the more is lost. A superconducting system, where the wires are cooled to a few degrees above absolute zero, eliminates any energy loss. Immediately, more power capacity would be available on the grid, helping to reduce congestion. More recent advances and the creation of higher-temperature superconductors have made this technology even more economical. So far, only small pilot programs have been introduced.

      Ironically, on the day of the blackout, the New York Times reported that Intermagnetics General was about to announce that it is building a prototype ``matrix fault current limiter'' which it has developed jointly with the Department of Energy. The system takes advantage of the fact that superconducting wires conduct less energy when they get warmer. In this case, were there a power surge on a transmission line, as there were many leading up to the blackout, the rise in temperature caused by the extra power would reduce the carrying capacity of the superconductor and reduce the surge to the level that a conventional circuit breaker can handle. In the case of the blackout, it appears that the surges overwhelmed some circuit breakers, which could not open circuits quickly enough to disconnect them from the rest of the grid.

      Almost no new technology has been introduced into the transmission system, because since deregulation, it is no one's mandated responsibility, and energy companies do not find it profitable to make the investments. [mgf]

      [source: Portland Press Herald, (Maine), Washington Post, New York Times, Aug. 16; NERC press conference, Aug. 15]

      WORST CASE, THE BLACKOUT COULD HAVE BEEN NATIONWIDE. Asked during the NERC press briefing on Aug. 15, ``What went right? during the blackout, Michael Gent replied that ``the outage was stopped before going further. Theoretically, it could have spread across the country.'' The nation has four major transmission interconnections, and the Eastern Interconnection goes from the Atlantic to the Rocky Mountains, skirting Texas, which has its own, separate grid system.

      As far as can be discerned at this point, the initiating event leading to the instability in the transmission system began in either Ohio or Michigan, through either a fault on the line or in a generator feeding power to the line. When a power line is inoperable, the power generated that cannot go along its expected route looks for the next, best transmission line, which then leads to an overload on the second line. The overload produces instabilities in the wires, immediately sensed by generating plants, which shut down to protect themselves. This further exacerbates the mismatch between generation and transmission, snowballing into more and more shutdowns. The initial problem was not contained when relays did not trip the now-overloaded secondary wires, open the circuits, and isolate the problem.

      What should have happened, is what did happen on the outer fringes of the problematical Great Lakes Loop. In Vermont, there was a quick shutdown of transmission lines from New York when the problem was detected, which averted major outages. When New York generating stations went offline, electricity from the New England grid north of New York, automatically

  60. No, it's just a few years too late by ebuck · · Score: 1

    A good installation time for something as mundane as a new remote transmitting unit at a power substation is around a year. As the equipment gets more exotic, the install times just seem to get longer and longer.

    Remember, that there's a need to perform planning, documentation, building of equipment, factory testing (if possible), updating of electrical load flow databases, delivery of equipment, waiting for appropriate load and weather conditions, installation of equipment, onsite testing, and finally the acceptance of the equipment.

    Each step has meetings, planning, deadlines, work, and it's own problems which may increase the delay of the equipment to the field. Buying a cable off the shelf at Radio Shack just won't do it, Power Engineering has the most conservative bunch of the lot. They want it to work, and they want to know it will work before they put at risk the entire company's revenue stream.

    What's your fall back plan if you next step dosen't work? If you don't have one, you won't be allowed to do it. Welcome to your nation's power grid.

  61. ... the Grid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hand me one o' them fuel cells! GE has a box the size of your dishwasher that makes enough electricity for your whole block, on natural gas!

  62. Also this company.. by questforme · · Score: 1

    http://www.encorp.com/ I was watching my local news a couple of days ago and they did a report on this company which is based not to far from where I live. The Spokesperson they interviewed said that if their hardware products were in use in the Niagra area this blackout this would've never happened, interesting.

  63. Economic grounds alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We've got the technology now to produce cleaner, safer, more powerful nuclear reactors

    Just not cost effective ones - just like the last generation. The government will eventually get sick of footing the bill for nuclear power - just like the UK government got sick of paying for British Nuclear Fuels. They got sick of the cost of construction decades ago. All those rare earths are rare and cost money. The Russian and Chinese plants don't cost a fortune to run because they weren't designed by Americans (the Chinese plants probably were - but that's the espionage issue) they cost a fortune because you use a lot of expensive materials to boil water - a great deal of which you have to keep carefully contained.
    if it means cleaner, safer, more reliable power

    No it doesn't. Sigh - an entire generation sucked in by an advertising campaign.
  64. Why waste the surge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pump that shit into a bunch of flywheels that can act as a dampening system.

  65. And another thing.. by olman · · Score: 1

    A few more observations if you don't mind..

    French != Europe, unless you're french. Moreveover, even after severe physical damage to their grid, the blackout did not cascade beyond physically cut off locations. Instead the grid worked as it is supposed to and isolated the disturbance to as small area as possible.. Not letting it propagate to Germany and Belgium..

    For what it's worth, up here in Finland we have severe weather all the time and it's considered a scoop if, 20000 people are without electricity for 12 hours after a blizzard. We also have competitive power infrastructure with separate entities owning power plants, distribution grid and consumer sales. Nothing like E.on which would keel over immediately without corporate welfare.