Slashdot Mirror


Plasma TVs vs. LCD Projectors for Your Home Entertainment?

Kent Brewster asks: "We're working on making the presence of a TV set in our living room as unobtrusive as possible. The two main flat-or-invisible screen choices seem to be plasma and LCD projection. Gateway has a $3000 42-inch plasma screen, but I see ominous comments on Usenet about how that one's not really an HDTV and therefore to be avoided. Projector Xpress has a page of Sony projectors that are at or around that $3000 mark, and the street price for a home system that's HDTV-compatible seems to be working its way down to $1000. I would love to hear from anyone who's actually owned one of the Gateway models and might be willing to discuss pros and cons; same goes for anyone who's watching TV on a video projector. How's your bulb life, and what do they cost? Is the thing hot and noisy? Was it hard to set up? Have you integrated it with your home theater? Are you using a screen, or just shooting it onto the wall? If I do this, am I going to feel like an idiot a couple of years from now when LED bulbs replace everything?"

36 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Fog screen? by retostamm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe you want a Fog Screen?

  2. Google found this... by HavokDevNull · · Score: 3, Informative

    And I have done most of my reseach for a projector from this page. http://www.projectorcentral.com/

    in which I'm very happy with my InFocus X1

    --
    Sig
    1. Re:Google found this... by HavokDevNull · · Score: 2, Informative

      I even got one for work too great little projectors.. Some pixelation if you stand about a foot away or put your nose on the screen. Sceen size 60"x80"

      I have only one complaint it is a little dark in video mode. So you have to keep the room very dark. It has Great color, all in all for the $$$ it is worth it.

      If you want to spend 4 times as much the new 3m projectetor here
      is 3500 lumens which is brighter than the $10K big boys ;)

      --
      Sig
    2. Re:Google found this... by HavokDevNull · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well one thing about projectors is that my X1 will beat out many of the $5000 projectors. That new 3M for $4k is the latest. And that one beats many of the $10k ones. The speed in which technology in projectors is catching up to the same speed as CPU's.

      Last year there were only 2 different types of projector technologies, this year there are 3 for instance.

      But as always you should go down and view any TV or Projector before you buy.

      --
      Sig
  3. Not LED Bulbs... by GoRK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not LED bulbs, buddy... Laserbeams!

    The in-development technology will use lasers fired at scanning, switching MEMS mirrors to produce an image. It's kind of a cross between DLP, laser scanners, and nanotech.

    The best part about it? No lens. No bulbs to replace (Though your lasers might burn up), and your throw distance can be basically any length without the distortion you'd get out of traditional optics trying to do the same thing. Want a 100 inch picture three feet away from the projector? No problemo.

  4. projector all the way by Bonewalker · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I use an NEC LT-150 projector with 800 lumens. I am thrilled with it. It uses DLP technology and is HDTV ready.

    Also, I have hooked it up to my home theater and watched crystal clear DVD's on the size of my wall, played my PS2 on it, and used it as my computer screen on occasion when playing some games. It works perfectly in all of those scenarios.

    I have even pointed it outside and the picture was stunning up against the neighbor's house...it was at least 40 ft wide and 25 feet tall!

    Also, it is a very small device. Much smaller than InFocus' stuff. Very easy to hide, or remove and put away until you need it.

    Best part is they are available on ebay for less than or close to $1000.

    1. Re:projector all the way by andrewski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use an NEC LT-150 projector with 800 lumens.

      Do you live at the bottom of a lightless system of caves, or what? Even under 60w incandescents, 800 lumens can hardly be seen.

    2. Re:projector all the way by andrewski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bullshit.

      800 Lumens has almost no contrast in 60w light. If you indeed are happy with the 800 lumens unit, even in daytime (which still is quite dark at the bottom of a system of lightless caves), I would challenge your ability to see, think, or put rational ideas together.

      No personal offense, but I just think you are so full of shit that I smell it over the cable modem.

    3. Re:projector all the way by Blademan007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI. In a movie theater, the actual ouput that hits the screen is 16-18 footlamberts.

      800 is what you might see from the projector at the bulb. As you move away it will be much less.

      And if contrast is what you are concerned with, go with the darkest room, and the smallest screen for the best ratio.

  5. Recommendations by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have the room for a projector, and are willing to have a giant screen in your room, then there's no reason not to go with one and get a three to four times as big of a picture. If you're willing to go up to about $4,000, shop around and see if you can find an InFocus Screenplay 5700. It's MSRPed at $5K, and I know plenty of places sell it for $4K, maybe you could find a good deal to bring it down further. It's a 16:9 widescreen, DLP projector running at 1024x768 with HDTV support up to 1080p, recommended for use with a 100" screen. http://www.projectorcentral.com/infocus_screenplay _5700.htm

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  6. Re:42" not HDTV by PsychoI3oy · · Score: 5, Informative

    IAAFGE*

    the 42 inch is HD compatable, meaning it will accept a component input that's HD and downconvert it to the TV's native format, EDTV. EDTV = 480p, or standard resolution but progressive scan. HDTV = 780p or 1060i. having viewed HDTV signal (from dish network) on said plasma screen, i can say that it looks awesome, and might be a good set now while the cable companies & TV stations sort out the transition to being fully HD. for reference, all (most?) DVDs are EDTV, such that any dvd with a progressive scan player hooked to the gateway or a $6k sony/philips/whatever will look nearly identical. can't speak to much on the projector issue, but i've heard bulbs can be rather costly, and ambient light is always a consideration. the gateway 42" plasmas are in their 3rd if not 4th generation, and previous complaints about contrast ratio and how 'black' the darkest colors are have been addressed, such that owners of older models might be complaining about issues not present in the one you'd buy today.

    hope this helps.

    other features in the gateway TV: standard analog tuner, inboard speakers (pointing out the sides of the tv, but not bad sounding at all), wall mount bracket was $179 when i left, they may have changed the price, extended warranty options, including accidental damage protection (trust me, you dont' want to have to pay to get it fixed), a host of monster cables available, professional installation available, standard floor stands if you don't feel like haning it on a wall. etc.

    *I Am A Former Gateway Employee

    --
    -PsychoI3oy
    mmm freeBSDelicious.
  7. Check plasmatvbuyingguide.com by oni · · Score: 3, Informative

    This site has a point by point comparison of plasma and LCD. If I understand correctly all digital televisions, be they CRT, LCD or plasma can display HDTV. However, if the screen does not have the same number of pixels or the same aspect ratio of HDTV then the picture will be adjusted. FWIW I don't think I'd pay much extra for a very few extra pixels. If the best value was non-HDTV that's what I'd get. It will still display HDTV programs if I understand correctly.

    1. Re:Check plasmatvbuyingguide.com by hawkstone · · Score: 2, Informative

      1: Yes, they can display HDTV "signals".

      2: The lower resolution is often called "EDTV", for "enhanced definition". The EDTV/HDTV resolution price difference is around $3k vs $6k.

      3: It is not just a "very few extra pixels" as you call it. The resolution difference is more like 1366x768 vs 852x480. That's about 1.7x in each dimension, and 3x total pixel count by area. On a computer, I'm sure you'd agree that's a phenomenal difference.

  8. XGA DLP by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm very happy with my XGA DLP projector (Plus UP-1100P business projector with modifications to improve home theater quality). I've got it mounted from a vaulted ceiling using two unistrut (U-shaped channel with holes in it) lengths and threaded rod for adjustment, so mine's not too invisible. I use a 110" diagonal 4:3 painted area for my screen (88x66"). I just used flat white paint from Lowes. There is a place called Screen Goo that makes paint designed for projectors; on there you can find some cool pictures of a house where the projection screen was integrated into the room decor by painting it on the wall, with a decorative border. Without the projector on it just looks like a landscape with a white area and then clouds above. You can get some high-grade glass and put the projector in another room, with just a small hole in the wall, for noise elimination and complete removal of any sign of electronics (except for speakers, of course).

    1. Re:XGA DLP by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2, Informative

      The modifications were ordered by the previous owner of the projector. They were made by someone who goes by the name of "Thumper" on the AVS forum. I believe that the usual modifications were realignment of the optics (though I think my optics are once again misaligned, as on the left side of the image the colors are separated by about two-thirds of a pixel in a prism-like fashion), and addition of a mask around the DLP chip to reduce halo. There may have been other things done to improve the contrast ratio and reduce unwanted scattered light as well.

  9. 4 years ago by ballpoint · · Score: 5, Informative

    I faced the same choice. Plasma was > 15000$ while SXGA projectors were around 6000$.

    I went for an LCD projector, installed upside down (in ceiling mode) and projecting onto a 100" diagonal pull-down screen. DVD playback via PC VGA out; TV/Video S-Video in). 5x100W RMS + 150W RMS sub sound system with excellent speakers.

    I've watched around 400 DVDs by now. Haven't changed the lamp yet. The power supply broke down once (300$ repair) and the projector has developed a nasty 'shadow'. Fixing it is quoted 2000$ so this is out of the question. (I could fix it myself; probably a leaky capacitor in the A/D conversion but the schematics are not available)

    What I don't like:
    - steep projector repair prices (avoid InFocus ?).
    - screen is not quite flat causing waving lines.
    - darkening the room is mandatory (problematic in summer)
    - projector and PC are noisy (tho my sound system can easily overwhelm them)
    - watching non-HD TV. The quality sucks.
    - not suitable for 'background' TV viewing.

    All in all I've had a very good time (at about $10/hour in viewing costs), and while prices have come down significantly I don't regret my 'investment'.

    A TV and a home theatre are very different things. So when HDTV becomes available I think I'd go for plasma.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  10. rear-projection dlp by honold · · Score: 3, Informative

    - no concerns about light control. if you're using a front projector, your room has to be DARK.

    - no concerns about burn-in. unlike plasma, lcd, and crt (direct view and rear projection) the screen cannot have an image burned into it. watch blackboxed 4x3 television, play video games, and watch channels with static logos without having to deliberately balance your viewing.

    - lightweight. samsung's flagship 61" rpdlp set weighs only 100 lbs. a 40" wega direct view crt weighs 300 lbs (and most of the weight is in the front of the unit).

    - little calibration required for optimal viewing. most alternative sets need numerous factory menu tweaks in order to get acceptable color levels.

    - inexpensive. compare the prices :)

    - dvi-hdcp interface for future-proofed hdtv compatibility. also a perfect pixel reproduction as a monitor.

    the only maintenance needed is a $250 lamp every 2-3 years. i know a lot of these comparisons have been in contrast to front projection, but they should all be weighed.

    look at samsung's rpdlp site (they're the only major people pushing the sets so far), hit the avs forum for much better advice than you'll get here, and then check them out at your local store. most major department stores (best buy, circuit city, etc) have them on display unlike front projection units.

    1. Re:rear-projection dlp by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you notice the conversion from DVD's 720x480 to your PC monitor's 1600x1200? No? Then you won't notice this either. The scaler in these things is probably at least as good as a basic PC video card, which is good enough for most semi-AV-enthusiastic people. Hardcore fanatics will, of course, never be satisfied until they're using a $20000 scaler/deinterlacer with their $45000 projector on $100/sqft screen material with a $250000 speaker/amp system.

    2. Re:rear-projection dlp by jhoffoss · · Score: 3, Funny

      What, no popcorn machine?

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    3. Re:rear-projection dlp by macado · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Samsung does the conversion from 1080i to 720p as well as other formats extremely well and in my opinion. Not noticeable at all. There is a lot of speculation over which HD format is technically superior 720p or 1080i because while 1080i features more horizontal lines, it is still interlaced. The HD format 720p is progressive scan, so in theory the image is sharper with less flicker. Personally, I like 720p but your mileage will vary. They're both very good formats. If your hooking a DVD player up to a Samsung DLP television. The best way to go is DVI. The picture looks absolutely amazing. Although Component cables are usually the preferred way, DVI will give you less artifacts and an ultimately clear picture. Component cables are still analog while DVI will send uncompressed digital video to your television. A lot of people have also found that the de-interlacing chip inside the Samsung performs much better than most progressive scan DVD players however your mileage may vary.

      -macado

  11. Plasma and high elevations = bad by Drakino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you are at a high elevation, make sure any Plasma you look at is engineered to work there. If it's not, expect a loud and annoyning buzz to develop over time. Last I knew, the Gateway units had this problem.

  12. replace bulbs or recharge plasma? by doja · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Either way, the lifetime is significantly shorter than a traditional TV. Plasma TVs must be recharged as the gas is expended. Most plasma TVs list a lifetime of 20K to 30K hours, and this may be enough. Consider though, that if you left one of these on all of the time that it would die in about 3 years. Of course, few people would leave their TV on 24/7 (except businesses and such), but I wonder if the picture degrades as the plasma is used up. After a year or two, do you then need a recharge to get as good of a picture as when you bought the TV?

    1. Re:replace bulbs or recharge plasma? by checkyoulater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, few people would leave their TV on 24/7 (except businesses and such), but I wonder if the picture degrades as the plasma is used up. After a year or two, do you then need a recharge to get as good of a picture as when you bought the TV?

      We currently have about 10 Panasonic plasma displays at work. Not on 24/7, but on for a good 10 hours a day. The biggest problem: burn-in. Most of them display flash animations through Internet Explorer, and by and large they look great. However, within only a few months there is considerable burn-in on each display. Whenever the webserver is offline or otherwise unavailable, the white background error message can badly burn in. There is a feature they call white wash that can clean most of it up, but I am not too sure how much of the lifespan that removes. I'm guessing that the cost of recharging one of these things is probably close to the cost of a brand new unit. As far as lifespan goes, I guess I can let you know in 2 years... I personally haven't noticed any significant degradation in image quality, but the displays are located in such a place as to make an honest judgement impossible. However, it has only been about 5 months.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    2. Re:replace bulbs or recharge plasma? by Patrick+Lewis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plasma TVs don't need to be recharged. The plasma is sealed in the unit. It is the phosphors that degrade over time, not the plasma.

      --
      "If I am such a genius, how come that I am drunk and lost in the desert with a bullet in my ass?" --Otto (Malcom ITM)
  13. Consider the noise by KyleCordes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something important to consider is the noise generated by the fan in a projector. There may be some quiet ones out there, but most projectors I encounted, regardless of DLP/LCD/etc., are too loud. (How loud is too loud? I expect a $2-5000 TV to be at least not much worse than a $200 TV...)

  14. Forget both of those by ralphclark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a Sony KP61PS2 - it's a 61" (yes, sixty-one inch) rear projection CRT set.It's not a HD set because there is no HD programming here in the UK, but since I mainly use it to watch DVD's anyway, that's hardly a problem. Instead it has Sony's "Digital Reality Control" (DRC) which doubles the apparent resolution (it's necessary at this size).

    The screen technology they use throws the vast majority of the light directly forward in a fairly narrow cone, concentrating it powerfully, so the brightness and contrast has to be seen to be believed. Even when viewing in daylight.

    This set absolutely rocks for viewing movies.

    Surprisingly despite its size, the set is no deeper than a conventional TV and will fit against the wall without sticking out too far. In fact it sticks out just far enough that if you are using external speakers, the front of the set will be just about flush with them. Perfect.

    As for price, this TV cost me quite a bit less than a low-end 42" plasma screen. With none of the picture quality deficiencies inherent in plasma screen displays.

    The only thing that would beat my TV is a good quality ceiling mounted CRT projector. And you know how expensive those are.

    BTW I coupled this with a JVC DVHS machine, and the picture quality of my digital off-air recordings is indistinguishable from the original, even on this monster screen. I doubt most DVR recorders are that good.

  15. digital light by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Informative

    I personally wouldn't buy a plasma screen; their price versus their longevity makes them a lousy investment. OLED may be better; though their longevity may be in doubt, the price will be a lot better. But if you want to make a real investment in a home theater, go with digital light.

    Digital light, in case you don't know, means a projector with an array of MEMS-controlled mirrors reflecting light at the screen. (When they talk about flipping a pixel, they really mean it!) These projectors can handle a lot more light without needing a noisy cooling fan, and should last longer than any of the current competing technologies, despite the expense of a good projector.

  16. Wait a little if you can by feyhunde · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I work for a midsize company that does displays in R&D. My advice is to wait. There are huge issues with Plasma that make it a ripoff. Projectors are better, but only good for dedicated home theater. It is like this, Plasma is photo-emissive. It depletes itself constantly, but not on a linear scale. The first thousand hours are key. That means, you turn on your TV from outta the box, turn on a test screen, leave for a few hours, and the screen is damaged forever. The damage can be localized too. Watching a TV station that uses a bug will burn in the bug after a while. The full color gamat is not being used, so the depletion is not equal and the image suffers. This holds true for all emission displays. If you hook up your plasma to a computer that has a fixed image, say a start menu or a dock, or a SCO logo burning as a backround, it will burn in. It is only possible to remove by reverse driving the image, and that requires 1337ness and an understanding of colors. As for LCD projectors, they choke with the lights on. They are good for home video, and do great there, but are not normal TV's. My advice is to wait. The gen 6 LCD plants will be here soon. With them will come 42 AMLCDs that will be fast enough and bright enough for this use. They should also be much cheaper, possibly low end models for under $1500. There are a few good ones that exist now, but are more expensive due to reduced capacity. You can get a beautful 42 inch AMLCD for about $10,000 now, but that price will drop very quick very soon.

    --
    I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    1. Re:Wait a little if you can by uradu · · Score: 2, Informative

      > It should not be a main set, and can not be
      > used unless in controlled settings.

      I'll agree with that, but it seems that talking about HT sort of implies that. I don't usually go to the den and fire up the whole rig to watch a sitcom or the news. To me the HT is basically a twice-a-week affair for sit-down movies and popcorn, and with that kind of usage a projector is perfect and would last a long time with a 3000 hour bulb.

  17. Plasmas myths and facts by macado · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay i've seen a few posts commenting about Plasmas and their lifespans and I just thought i'd clarify from what I know. First of all, There is no such thing as "recharging a plasma", Once the half life of the neon or zenon gas is done, its gone. The old "plasma recharging trick" is a common misconception/myth which is sometimes used by salesmen who have little knowledge of what they are selling. Plasmas cannot be recharged, period. Most plasmas have a lifespan of about 20,000 to 30,000 hours depending on the manufacturer. Pioneer models claim 30,000 because of "deep enclosed cells" however I am not sure how true their claim is. Most companies claim an average lifespan of about 10-15 years based on average viewing habits. This is not a bad lifespan for a TV, if correct. The Gateway Plasma is a rebranded Sampo model which can be purchased as Costco or Best Buy. It has the effective resolution of 480p, which is approximately the quality of a DVD and will accept all HD signals but only scale them down (most do a decent job but still not HD). Most plasmas display 1080i natively.

    -macado
    I apologize before hand if any of this information is incorrect. Feel free to correct me.

  18. The gateway plasma's really are not good... by Opusnbill7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I must say that what you're reading on usenet about the gateways is true. We had a couple at work for a _short_ period about 3 months ago and they were bad. Blurry, fuzzy, burned in in less than 24 hours as a monitor (even though they're sold to be used with a computer...). Generally not good. Might be ok for standard definition TV (they didn't look bad from about 4 ft+) but would definitely recommend saving your pennies for something better if you're looking for a "plasma" experience. Also hear that the gateways are re-badged Sampo's so you might be careful with those also.

  19. If you care at all about actually being able to... by Sarreq+Teryx · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...display full resolution 1920x1080i HDTV, then the only thing out there is a high-end CRT. I've looked everywhere and noone make a DLP or LCD Projector or plasma or LCD flat panel which can display full reolution HDTV (except for the apple 23"cinema display, and possibly other computer models at this size, but that's not for TV)

  20. plasma vs. lcd vs. projector by rudog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Throwing specs around is great but really won't answer your question; as opposed to user-experience, which I can offer.

    Where I work I use NEC 42" plasma screens daily, I have 2 friends with 50" pioneers plasma screens and have worked with sony plasma's previously. I have several 17-18-19" LCD's for work and 1 friend with a Panasonic LCD TV ( I believe it is 36" diag). We also use several runco hd-dlp front-projector/wall-screen set-ups and 1 samsung rear-projector dlp-tv.

    In all cases if you sit closer than 6-8 feet to the plasmas' then any you will constantly notice jaggies during normal tv viewing and several types of ghosting/artifacts during any high speed action sequences. The NEC's cost us about US $9k /each.

    The problem is that you buy a big screen for just that reason - real estate - and if you have to sit 10 feet away then it defeats the purpose because then your new 61" whizbang looks the size of your 27" whatzit you started out with.

    Enter the LCD, They have better control over jaggies but then you are very constrained when it comes to viewing locations - you basically need to be directly in front and within about 8 feet in a well lit room in order to view it comfortably.The pc screens all run about US $1k, but the tv ran my friend US $5k.

    Projectors are all about tweaking, on 2 of our runco sets we have rooms with one wall entirely of glass i.e. tons of sunlight, and the projectors are set to throw a 72" screen from 8 feet away (they are ceiling mount) and they are beautiful to see in action - no jaggies or artifacts and colors are spot-on. But it did take about 3 days of tweaking to get that with all video sources.And they cost about US $7k per set-up.

    Our primary Runco set-up is a 14footx8foot screen with the projector set 20feet back. This was because even after going through all the specs before hand, the darn thing wouldn't give us the full image from the 16foot distance reccomended by the factory install team.

    And after 2 weeks of tweaking the image is barely viewable with all lights off, the images ae fuzzy and color alignment is all wrong; we have to replace the bulb about every 3 and a half weeks @ US $600/bulb; and this was their top of the line dlp from 2 years ago -almost US $20k.

    The samsung rp-dlp is beautiful in action and doesn't have any issue with ambient light in the room, however it did run about US $5k.

    For a home setup, I have a great 36" toshiba digital tv. Complete with component connections and a sony HDTV tuner + PS2 + gamecube.

    This gives the best cost/performance ratio as it cost only US $1200 plus another US $1200 for the tuner, which isn't included with any of the other set-ups.

    Bottom Line: Get out to all of the showrooms you can and actually look at these things in person, You will be surprised at how good your current set-up actually compares to what is available out there.

  21. Neither Plasma Nor LCD by VernonNemitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    2048x1152 DLP (front projection)
    1280x720 DLP (rear projection)
    Flat CRT (still under development)
    Inorganic Electroluminescent (still under development)
    Electrostatics & Suspension (ambient light, still working on color)
    Electrostatics & Revolution (ambient light, still working on color)
    Electrostatics & Interference (ambient light, no plans for larger modules!?!?)

  22. Hmm... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Super-high-res projector capable of 3000+ lumens - $20k+ most likely.

    "OK" projector, maybe 720p-capable, 1200 lumens - $5-6k, maybe less.

    Curtains: $100 or less.

    So I can either spent $15000 overcoming lights in the room, or I can spend $100 and install some fucking curtains.

    Real tough decision there.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  23. No TV is best solution by macrostiff · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We're working on making the presence of a TV set in our living room as unobtrusive as possible." sez Keith

    Suggestion
    1)No TV, this is my preference but compromise is the key to a long marraige so...
    2)13" all in one CRT type with tape and DVD for $149. It fits nicely on the oven when not in use.
    3)Buy my 1000 surplus 10.2" 640x480 dual scan, 7mm thick LCD panels for $10k and make your wall into a TV (black and white though :-)