Slashdot Mirror


SCO DOS Harming Innocent Bystanders

An anonymous reader writes "The SCO-IBM-Linux controversy has certainly caused quite a stir. Unfortunately the vigilantes conducting the DOS attacks against SCO are harming innocent by-standers as described in this e-Week story. " Choice conspiracy theory quote: 'Given SCO's behavior recently, it's just as likely that they're attacking themselves in their continued attempt to pump up their stock price'

34 of 422 comments (clear)

  1. Re:http://www.sco.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe we should all test it. Right now.

  2. Smoking crack poll by RedWizzard · · Score: 3, Funny

    I like their poll. I wonder how SCO's PR department would spin the fact that 96% of people think SCO are smoking crack.

    1. Re:Smoking crack poll by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      well it's pretty obvious that ibm paid some hippies to vote.

      .
      you mean you didn't get your cheque?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Smoking crack poll by nocomment · · Score: 4, Funny

      probably in one of 2 ways.

      1> They will blame it on IBM

      2> They will say that since they are known for vaporware, that any derivitive "vapors" belong to them. Then they will start to sue drug dealers and junkies charging them a license fee to to continue smoking their crack.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    3. Re:Smoking crack poll by eniu!uine · · Score: 2, Funny

      "2> They will say that since they are known for vaporware, that any derivitive "vapors" belong to them. Then they will start to sue drug dealers and junkies charging them a license fee to to continue smoking their crack."

      I wouldn't put it past them to go after the drug cartels.... in most cases their enforcers are preferable to IBM's lawyers.

  3. DOS too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, as if the UNIX scandal wasn't bad enough... now they are after DOS as well!!!

    1. Re:DOS too? by BrynM · · Score: 4, Funny

      Beside your point, but anyone who can orchestrate an attack with DOS is truly l33t. That must be one hell of a batch file.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:DOS too? by d3faultus3r · · Score: 3, Funny

      No I think that what the attack was was installing ms-dos on SCO's computers. A fate not even SCO deserves!

      --
      read my blog
      musings on politics and technol
  4. Yeah well by pclminion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, well tough shit. If they don't like it, they can complain to their ISP to get those SCO criminals booted off their network.
    </sarcasm>

    Sorry, I was just trying to imitate the SPEWS guys ;-)

  5. Maybe it's a subtle plan by lgordon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps SCO placed the alleged IP infringing code into the linux kernel themselves. Maybe the code contains a timebomb so as to cause a distributed denial of service attack against SCO, giving them more publicity. I wonder when the Underpants Gnomes are going to sue SCO for patent infringement for their unique business model...

    So much for trying to be funny...

  6. The Fault of the Apache Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, if their server had been running proper licensed SCO code then it would not only have survived the continual DoS, but would have shot down the attacking machines in droves...

    ...but no, they just want to demonstrate how crap Apache & Linux is, especially since it is stolen perversion of all of SCO's IP. And what an effective demonstaration it is, why that must be propping up the stock value by about 99%

    ;-)

  7. It just so happens... by cerebralsugar · · Score: 3, Funny

    That the concept of DOS attacks is owned by SCO! SCO developed this technology very early on.

    All those running worms/shell scripts used in DOS attacks can license the IP behind it now! Only $799! (Special Introductory Price).

    --
    Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
  8. A hyperlink for the lazy by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:A hyperlink for the lazy by helix400 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is it just me, or does SCO's motto "SCO Grows Your Business" sound too much like spam emails?

    2. Re:A hyperlink for the lazy by xmedh02 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, when you search for smoking crack", the first link says: SCO smoking crack. :-)

  9. ca-ching... by donnz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another US$100k to the senior VP on Tuesday last week.

    Makes it One Million Dollarsin two months.

    Reginald C. Broughton...come on down!

    (so it's OT, but keep watching these bastards).

    --
    -- Free software on every PC on every desk
  10. Server Stats and relevance by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next McBribe will be showing off a server stats chart to stock holders as proof of sco's growing relevance in the high tech world.

  11. Good excuse... by EverDense · · Score: 3, Funny

    Our corporate e-mail was out for a couple of days earlier this week.
    I'm blaming SCO for it.

    "Sir, looks like a friendly fire incident"

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
  12. I Got Sued By SCO...... by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.

    --
    Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
    1. Re:I Got Sued By SCO...... by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 2, Funny


      You suck. You suck purely because you didn't tell me where I can order one of those t-shirts at! :-)


      Well to get a T-shirt, just send a $699 introductory priced license fee for each T-Shirt to:

      Darl McBride
      123 SCO Lane
      Cayman Islands
      90210

      Better hurry, once the promotion is over, licensing fee for each t-shirt goes to $1399.

      --
      Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
  13. Re:I Disagree by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "LSD more often sparks insight or provides a novel point of view rather than causing outright delusions. Cocaine and amphetamines on the other hand can cause outright schizophreniform psychosis if taken for too long. This and the correlation between D2 receptor antagonism and antipsychotic potency is why schizophrenia is thought to be a largely dopaminergic disorder. Though it's becoming clear that glutaminergic and cholinergic systems play a significant role."

    Could you please translate this for those of us that smoke crack?

  14. Re:I Disagree by vsprintf · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's exactly what I was telling Timothy Leary when I spoke to him the other day, and he agreed completely.

  15. Re:I Disagree by voudras · · Score: 4, Funny

    Translation:

    Encountering Police while zooted on cocaine is: Scary
    Obvious responce: run like hell

    Encountering Police while looped on stamps is: Scary
    Obvious responce: wet pants laughing

  16. Um, no... by msimm · · Score: 4, Funny

    DOS attacks are the internet equivalent of standing outside someones home playing heavy metal at 140 dB.

    Obviously you missed the whole heavy metal thing. Standing outside of someones home playing heavy metal would be about picking up chicks (most likely the daughter of the family who's house your serenading). The SCO/DDOS equivalent would be something like driving around in a drunken stupor taking mailboxes off their posts with a baseball bat (or something equally annoying).

    --
    Quack, quack.
  17. Likewise... by siskbc · · Score: 2, Funny
    Linux users cannot be seen as a group of geeks with no respect for the law and proper buisness procedures.

    ...SCO can't be seen as an IT company* without a functioning web site. ;)

    Discalimer: yes, I know they're in the lawsuit business now. By reading this post, you acknoqledge that all joke replies are to at least be original.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  18. Re:DOS? Perhaps not. by killthiskid · · Score: 2, Funny
    I honestly don't think Eric Raymond can stop the DoS attackers to stop..

    I think honestly words above english proper not.

    Not a gramma nazi... just thought that sentance read funny enough to point out. Don't hate me =)

    And, no, I'm not off topic, moderators. At this point I would comment on how commenting on a moderator giving me an off topic mod would be self fulling, but I won't, since then it would happen.... oh wait... damn.

  19. Its just P0Rn by Pro_Piracy_Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, I'll stop downloading P0rn, the net should speed back up in a minute.

  20. No jobs at SCO by overbyj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Go to sco.com and take a look at the employment section. It says "There are currently no job openings at SCO." I wonder why. Aren't they going to be focusing on updating their products soon? Shouldn't they at least be hiring some movers to help clean out their stuff after the big fire sale once they are crushed?

    --
    No trees were harmed in the composition of this; however, numerous electrons were inconvenienced.
  21. Re:I Disagree by 1nsane0ne · · Score: 2, Funny
    LSD more often sparks insight or provides a novel point of view rather than causing outright delusions.

    See original BSD code.

    Like there were people in Berkley in the 60's - 70's and not doing LSD?

  22. Whew! Not that DOS! by bombom · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a moment when I read the title of the story I thought SCO was claiming rights to good ol DOS :)

    --
    IOException - Can't Speak
  23. What is needed here is a *REAL* DoS attack by IBM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What IBM should do here is be absolutely ruthless.

    Don't just go after The SCO Group, go after
    Canopy. IBM has more patents than God has
    shoestrings. They dug up four in short order that
    were being violated by SCO. Don't stop there.
    Find a patent for every product or service that
    every Canopy backed company sells. Start filing
    injunctions to stop them from selling all
    products and services that they produce.

    So come on, IBM:
    Show them what you can do to threatening little
    companies when you *really* get angry! I'll buy
    a new Thinkpad if you do!

  24. Re:Net packet loss by suss · · Score: 3, Funny

    Checking on Xaffire Inc.'s Internet Average it's obvious that there are a few problems.

    Slashdotting a site about internet statistics via a link on a thread about DDoS...

    Now, *that's* Irony for ya, Alanis! (I hope you get it now)

  25. Re:Typical zealot reaction by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...I don't feel guilty at all about sucking up their bandwidth by viewing their web pages with the reload button.

    Boy, that'll tell 'em!

    SCO might be threatening to sue you, but it seems to me they've already got you wasting your time.

    Guess he didn't tell you he had his reload key remapped to a script:

    #!/bin/bash
    while true
    do
    wget --no-http-keep-alive --delete-after -m -p http://www.sco.com
    done

    and it was on a dual cpu box parked on an OC-3, so maybe his time wasn't completely wasted ;)

    Don't do this at home kiddies, you should go own someone elses box first, or maybe a few boxes....

    Just kidding, go ahead and do it at home.
    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  26. Their ISP? by base2_celtic · · Score: 2, Funny

    A comment in a recent article here pointed out that their upstream ISP seems to be IBM. I wouldn't want to be the IT guy at SCO who has to raise that issue.

    "Uh, hi... is this IBM?"
    Yes, it is; what can I do for you?"
    "Uh, this is, uh, [edited] at SCO. Someone's DOSing us, and..."
    [uproarious laughter from IBM rep]
    [CLICK]

    --
    Using the holy grail of OSes...