Slashdot Mirror


Statistically Optimal Music

ShinyPlasticBag writes "'Eigenradio makes its optimal music by analyzing in real time dozens of radio stations at once. When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it. Since we listen to so much music all the time, Eigenradio is always on and always live. What you hear on Eigenradio is the best of the New Music, distilled and de-correlated. One song on Eigenradio is worth at least twenty songs on old radio.' Listen up here or here (SHOUTcast)."

74 of 296 comments (clear)

  1. Hello darkness, my old friend by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I quickly checked out the site and hit the #1 "Listen" link. At first, it was an interesting mix... in fact, it sounded very much like tuning an AM radio between stations, except that the overlapping songs were in clearly-defined hi-fi.

    It was jarring at first, but then I got into a groove. They're right, the beat and the ambient voices have a strange but familiar variance.

    Unfortunately, I don't think I'll be able to keep up the experience. After about a minute, the rhythms stopped, replaced by a metallic, toneless hum.

    Cool... I've seen the Slashdot effect before, but now I'm getting to hear it!

    Footnote: the rhythm has returned, but there's a lot more buzz than before. Will be interesting to hear what happens when the non-subscriber flood hits.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by turg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What makes you think that the slashdot effect changes the content of the music?

      I heard the same thing that you did, but as I understand it, the only input that goes into the music is the content of the radio stations to which the server is listening. I don't see how the number of listeners to eigenradio would have cause the effect you're describing.

      --
      <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
    2. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What makes you think that the slashdot effect changes the content of the music?

      I guess it would depend on how they've configured their systems. If they have one box processing the incoming signals, and another box uploading the result to their Windows Media Server, then we might overload the second box but the sound would be unchanged.

      But if the box that does the processing is the same as the one that's attempting to service all the requests from Slashdotters, it seems like it would eat up CPU cycles. That would make it more difficult to do the real-time synthesis of 20 incoming signals. I suspect that's the cause of the toneless drone I was hearing.

      Add to that the bandwidth -- do they have one pipe that's receiving 20 signals, outputting (however many) Eigenradio streams, *and* serving up the strangely-formatted web page?

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    3. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Gettin'_Fatter · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only we could do this to actions movies...one hummin' explode-fest!

      --

      Surely, we don't need instructions on shampoo bottles, do we?.

    4. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Jonner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rarely is the need for mulitcast felt more than when a music stream is slashdotted.

  2. The RIAA? by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What does the RIAA have to say about you using their copyrighted material to generate music - music which is arguably not unique, but rather derivatives of their property?

    1. Re:The RIAA? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah...
      What do they have to say about using the very algorithm that they apparently use to generate much of their own music, judging from the songs being released the past decade or so?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:The RIAA? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't there a minimum amount of copyrighted material that has to be sampled before it requires compensating the artist? So far, I haven't heard more than a ~2sec snippet of recognizable voice, so maybe it falls below the threshhold.

      Not that that would keep the RIAA's goons from filing suit. But that's alright... if they try to listen now, they'll hear a metallic buzz (if they can connect at all).

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    3. Re:The RIAA? by Sphere1952 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They'll probably subpoena the entire MIT student body via the D.C. court.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    4. Re:The RIAA? by LuxFX · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it can be argued that the algorithm that has created this music has, in a sense, encrypted the popular music it was derived from. If the RIAA can detect their copyrighted music in the newly generated music, it must mean they have circumvented that music's encryption. Say hello to the DMCA, Hillary.

      But if you don't want to go with the fire w/ fire method, you could also call the newly generated music a parody of popular music -- it is, as you said, derivatives of their property -- and protect it that way.
      .

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    5. Re:The RIAA? by moncyb · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's an urban legend. Any usage of samples violates copyright law if not approved ahead of time by the copyright holder.

      IANAL, but I'm sure this is wrong. While it is probably true you can't use samples in the way mentioned in the article without permission, there is such a thing as fair use. You can have a small sample for the purposes of commenting on something. Say you were writing an article about reverse speech, and you swear you hear "Ah babe, as I make love" in a song called Foolish Beat by some singer named Debbie Gibson, it would probably be okay to include the specific part of the song as a sample, though the law doesn't seem to be specific here, and the RIAA might try to sue you anyway. (Just because they're legally wrong doesn't stop the RIAA.)

      Commenting is one of the major purposes of fair use: to enable fair speech and help uphold the "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" clause in the Constitution. The government isn't promoting science if scientists are restricted on how they write papers on a certain subject just because something they're illustrating is copyrighted. Similar clauses about encryption research were in the DMCA, but as usual, the RIAA ignored them. Copyright was intended to allow people to make money off their works, not restrict others from talking about those works.

      The real FUD about fair use is spread by the "all music is free" crowd and the RIAA. The "all music is free" crowd insist it's fair use to just give away the entire song as long as you don't charge for it. Obviously false. Part of the test for fair use is the economic impact of the copying. At least some of the people would have bought the work but didn't because they got it for free. (Though the RIAA tries to overbloat this and say every copy adversely affects their sales. Even "RAM buffer copies", copies which just sit on a hard drive and never get listened too, even copies downloaded by some teenager who couldn't afford a single CD, even other songs which have a similar name to an RIAA one.) The RIAA says there is no such thing as fair use. Obviously false too. If it were true, there wouldn't be a section in Federal Law about fair use at all.

  3. Suicide by neonstz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somehow I don't think posting a link to a shoutcast-stream on slashdot is the smartest thing to do...

  4. I can't help thinking by rritterson · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been listening to the stream for 5 minutes or so now. I can't help thinking that this is what a band of R2D2's would sound like, with C3P0 in random memory access as lead vocalist.

    It's so very electronic and unnatural sounding, like nothing of this world.

    --
    -Ryan
    AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
  5. Worst designed web site ever... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Horizontal scrolling required
    2. Tiny
    3. Virtually no links to anything
    4. Very small amount of information

    John.

    1. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by hey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree.

      How shocking a site where you have to
      pan instead of scroll!!!
      Why not?

      It was easy to understand how to use it.

      It used html and not (yuck) Flash.

    2. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

      .right to left read normally is English that sworn have could I

    3. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Shenkerian · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, that's fine if you are writing a web page for a language that is written vertically, but english is a right to left language, which mean horizontal scrolling is usually very very bad.

      You must read and write a dialect of English with which I'm unfamiliar.

      --
      You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    4. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by 11223 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ."s'ti" si rof gnikool er'uoy drow ehT ."sti" fo mrof evissesop eht si "stI"

    5. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by yarisbandit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er, it is cool - i have one.

      It's called the Typhoon magic ball mouse or the 8D scroll ball mouse, and I picked it up for a tenner or so (euro) in Lidl.

      Usb too (not 2, i mean aswell...) There's bound to be others, but this one is the finest cheapest one money can buy :)

    6. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by stickyc · · Score: 4, Funny
      How shocking a site where you have to
      pan instead of scroll!!!
      Why not?

      Because my mousewheel (as I'd estimate are 90% of the mousehweels out there) is mounted vertically. And yes, I tried rotating the mouse, that did not help.

  6. Please... by phraktyl · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the love of god, we will give your our women and our money, but make it stop!

    --
    Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    1. Re: Please... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > For the love of god, we will give your our women and our money, but make it stop!

      I notice you didn't offer your sheep.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  7. scanning radio stations? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So, they scan bunchies of stations to make new music.

    Now, if there was anything worth listening to on the radio, I'd say they'd have something, but hey don't because "Garbage In = Garbage Out".

    While hacking up pig snouts and horse hooves might make for an interesting, ummmm... "sausage", it's still nasty dead stuff...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  8. Easy answer by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somehow I don't think posting a link to a shoutcast-stream on slashdot is the smartest thing to do...

    Don't worry, it doesn't have long to live

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  9. Where are the details? by Sanity · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I wish they had spent as much time documenting what this actually did as they spent making the website pretty, the one remotely technical diagram on the website has no explanation whatsoever as to what it is about.

    IMHO this is yet another example of how academic projects are judged by the amount of attention they attract, rather than on whether they advance the state of the art. This is the reason why people like Kevin Warrick can stick a dog tag in their arm and go around claiming they are the world's first cyborg - all while being lavished with attention by the mainstream media.

    All of this leads to an academic system that increasingly rewards self pubicity at the expense of real reasearch.

    Oh, BTW - I listened to the radio station, it sounds like a garbled mess - I certainly couldn't determine the point of this from listening to it, but then I could say the same thing about rap.

    1. Re:Where are the details? by loadquo · · Score: 2, Funny

      About your sig.
      "I named my cat Script."

      Is this a security feature to confuse crackers when they break into your system?
      You should know security by obfuscation never works in the long run. Also it would break other people scripts.

    2. Re:Where are the details? by LineNoiz · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, he's my Script Kitty... Duh...

      --
      "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." --Oscar Wilde
    3. Re:Where are the details? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IMHO this is yet another example of how academic projects are judged by the amount of attention they attract, rather than on whether they advance the state of the art.

      Every Spring semester at Michigan State University's Computer Science department, the capstone class (taken by seniors to graduate) did a project and had a "poster competition" to see who did the best project.

      The team that won the year I saw them was the team that wrote a program that graphed a song's FFT over time. That's it. They went on to babble about how you can recognize a song based on how it looks, visual recognition, and it did some ill-conceived 3D stuff that, by making the song data fit into even less space on the screen, was even more impossible to see. (I think you were supposed to eventually pick the song you wanted to hear by looking at this tiny, tiny representations.... at the risk of potentially offending one of the authors, who may conceivably read this, that's stupid! If they just seriously tried it once, they'd have seen how poorly this worked.) (See here for an example of a guy playing around with that kind of graph; note most songs look NOTHING like that in an FFT graph. ;-) )

      The fact is, it's a neat idea but it doesn't work. All songs in a particular pretty much look alike in an FFT graph. The differences are pretty minimal. Making it smaller doesn't help at all. The program looked really cool on a poster, using one song, but use it on six or seven real songs and ask even yourself to distinguish them and you can't; you don't "see" and "hear" that way.

      IIRC a dot-com was founded based on this idea, AFAIK indepedently derived.

      What does this have to do with your post? I thought about half of the other posters deserved the prize over this project, in that they were useful, interesting, or potentially even groundbreaking, in the small way that a semester project can be. But they didn't have a Beatles song graphed out on their poster. They lose.

      Even college professors aren't immune to judging on surface appearences and glitz, rather then real value.

  10. Great by tmark · · Score: 2, Funny

    When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it.

    But what will the RIAA do when there are no more artists ?

    1. Re: Great by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


      > But what will the RIAA do when there are no more artists ?

      That's what they're doing now.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  11. video by bobtheheadless · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if you can do the same thing with video... hm.

    --
    --- If I had a funny sig too, you might be laughing now.
    1. Re:video by KillerHamster · · Score: 3, Informative

      You could call it "AutoPr0n."

  12. Re: Statistically Optimal Music by justforaday · · Score: 3, Funny

    One song on Eigenradio is worth at least twenty songs on old radio.

    i'm trying to tune in but i'm not hearing anything...i'd say that makes it better than old radio...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  13. Alright Bastards... by DAQ42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get off those links. Some of us actually listen to this on a regular basis (or rather, all day at work) and it helps us be more productive. Give me back my noise please. I can't get anything done without it...

    --
    Don't Ask Questions. I don't know the answers and even if I did I wouldn't tell you.
  14. Too many notes by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Funny
    Eigenradio plays only the most important frequencies, only the beats with the highest entropy ... One song on Eigenradio is worth at least twenty songs on old radio.

    Reader's Digest comes to music.

  15. Two suggestions... by pla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Beat and pitch.

    Make the derivative "music" at least try to keep these consistant, or at least slowly varying. If you can do that, this might work well.

  16. Creativity by worm+eater · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting that a bank of computers replicating human music can be so much more interesting than humans trying to replicate human music. I guess they have have a long way to go before they can make music as boring as most major record labels. "It's a feature, not a bug."

    --
    Maybe partying will help...
  17. wonderful organized noise is good for you. try it! by linuxbaby · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The first time I heard "noise" music like this, I was flipping around radio stations while driving down a highway. It all seemed like the same old 4-minute song with verse, chorus, verse, chorus, songs about love, 4/4 beats, major/minor keys, guitar-keys-bass-drums-vocals.

    And then... hit a college station playing this noise!

    What a refreshment! What a way to cleanse the pallette. No chords. No lyrics. No beats. No guitars. Nothing recognizable at all! Just wonderful organized noise.

    Then after listening to a LOT of it, especially the stuff that you know was actually composed by a human, something new happens:

    You start to listen to the world around you (traffic, nature, conversations) as if it was composed. Imagining a single intention behind the noise of the world. It really is a beautiful mindset. See the restaurant scene in the movie "32 Short Films About Glenn Gould." http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0108328/

    If you haven't spent a lot of time with music like this, try it. If you hate it after 5 minutes, listen for 10. If you hate it after 10, listen for 20. Try to appreciate it.

    --
    Derek Sivers, CD Baby
    http://www.cdbaby.com

  18. Yuck! by acousticiris · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know what radio stations they are sampling, but after a few minutes of listening it sounded like a bunch of "pop-tart" music strewn together being blasted over AM radio...
    I used to always joke that you could take all of the Spear Britney albums and--if mixed properly--you could make one long song that didn't change themes, tones or melody once...I'm thinking this is one step closer to proving that theory.... Maybe it was just the time I tuned in--who knows?
    There is one thing I find curious though, when I pick from 20 stations in my area, they are all playing the same 9 songs... I hope they have a better selection to choose from than I do!

    --
    "God is dead!" - Nietzsche
    "Nietzsche is dead!" - God
  19. Familiar... by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kinda reminds me of that "Super Recipe" generator I engineered in my lair beneath the Pacific Ocean a few weeks ago. It makes super recipes based on good recipes that you input into it. I like ice cream and filet mignon, so the generator created a filet cream recipe that was supposed to be super but was terrible.
    Blast!

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
  20. Wow! by Squidgee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, this really cleared up how this works for me! Thanks for such a clear, informative diagram!

    1. Re:Wow! by hyfe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually..

      PCA = Principal Component Analyses.. in essence it draws reduces the number of variables in a dataset by making up totally new ones... so in essence its just a simplification of their input.

      As to what the others are, I'm sure there are somebody here with more than my extremely meager signal processing knowledge:

      ACB = No clue
      DTW = Dynamic Time Warping
      NMF = Non-negative Matrix Factorization

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  21. Mirror - server's full by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

    100101011 010110101 000101010 1110010101
    100010101 010001010 101011010 1001010001
    001010101 101010001 010110001 0101010010....

  22. why scroll instead of pan by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What an interesting comment, I had to think about that one for a second. Generally Indo-European text reads across rather than up and down, so if a paragraph is horizontally larger than your window you have to pan twice to read each line, which is very annoying. However if a paragraph extends vertically a single scroll is sufficient for each page of text.

  23. No connection needed to listen! by soulsteal · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you listen carefully, you can hear the server whimper as it slowly melts under a slashdotting.

  24. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by DrEasy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You start to listen to the world around you (traffic, nature, conversations) as if it was composed.
    Yes, that's John Cage's premise to his "music" as well.
    --
    "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
  25. John Cage by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those of you enjoying these ideas might want to check out John Cage's wonderful video, I have nothing to say and I am saying it.

    John Cage was a revolutionary philosopher-artist-composer with some good ideas on how to be happy :-) In many ways he has incorporated Eastern thinking into Western arts.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  26. kittens with mittens? by mystik · · Score: 4, Funny
    <meta name="keywords" content="eigenradio, eigen, radio, non-negative matrix factorization, pca, ica, dwt, singular values, machine listening, whitman, brian, media, lab, kittens with mittens">

    anyone look at the page source?

    I bet this is how they Really make the music ...

    --
    Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
  27. Peercast to avoid the Slashdotting? by Kaimelar · · Score: 3, Informative

    This idea has sparked my interest, but the streams are most definately Slashdotted. Would it be possible for someone who has the stream to use Peercast to help take some of the burden off the server?

  28. Re:Interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ever heard of an Eigenvector?

    eigenvector

    A vector which, when acted on by a particular
    linear transformation, produces a scalar multiple of the
    original vector. The scalar in question is called the
    eigenvalue corresponding to this eigenvector.

    It should be noted that "vector" here means "element of a
    vector space" which can include many mathematical entities.
    Ordinary vectors are elements of a vector space, and
    multiplication by a matrix is a linear transformation on
    them; smooth functions "are vectors", and many partial
    differential operators are linear transformations on the space
    of such functions; quantum-mechanical states "are vectors",
    and observables are linear transformations on the state
    space.

    An important theorem says, roughly, that certain linear
    transformations have enough eigenvectors that they form a
    basis of the whole vector states. This is why Fourier
    analysis works, and why in quantum mechanics every state is a
    superposition of eigenstates of observables.

    An eigenvector is a (representative member of a) fixed point
    of the map on the projective plane induced by a linear
    map.

  29. Re:American Bandstand rating: 2 out of 10 by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Funny
    Not quite something you can dance to, is it?

    No, but it's great for epileptic spasms...

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  30. Why do I get the notion by John+Zebedee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... that this site is a wonderfully clever troll? Once you get past the notion that anyone could possibly be serious about Eigenmusic, satire is all that makes sense. A tip of the hat to the creators!

    --
    The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet. -- William Gibson
    1. Re:Why do I get the notion by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually this is a serious concept that goes back to John Cage's piece Imaginary Landscape #4, which was scored for 12 radios tuned at random.

      Of course that doesn't necessarily preclude it's being satire as well. The mind is fully capable of holding two contradictory ideas at once. Religious fundamentalists do it all the time.

      KFG

  31. Specific Sample Data by CmdrWiggle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be interesting to hear the differences in "statistically optimal" music produced as a result of correlating different genres of music.

    E.g., would people who only listened to Rock be more inclined to like the output of this program if its input was limited to Rock music? Could it create an "optimal" song?

  32. Re:more crap, just like the old crap by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm going way off topic here, but has anyone else heard what's going in Northern Califorina with the college radio stations being scrambled by christian fund-raising stations? I have no problems with any religious station, even if it's for questionable practices, but they're screwing with the public college stations because of an FCC loophole. Below is a copy/paste of the situation

    The Problem: A few years ago a station from Stockton, California, known as "Your Christian Companion" (KYCC) set up a translator in the eastern suburbs of Sacramento. They licensed a translator on 90.1FM (translator number K211DF), and since then, the once listenable signal of KDVS has been knocked off the spectrum there. Since then, KCJH/KYCC, the station that preaches God's word, has been expanding, setting up stations to cause interference with other stations like non-profit student stations similar to KDVS. In the East Bay area near Livermore, you can hear KYCC on 2 to 4 different frequencies, covering up many Bay Area college radio stations. The station is a fundraising tool for itself, collecting money to go toward buying new translators to feed their programming via automated procedure via satellite. This conservative entity is using non-commercial educational frequencies as a loophole to rebroadcast satellite programming in effort to gain more money for their own causes. Because of this, listeners in some parts of Sacramento cannot tune into KDVS. You can help try to get the FCC to move their translator from 90.1 FM to another frequency by making your voice heard to the FCC. Here's how you can help. Write an email stating you listen to KDVS radio, the only college/student run station in the area. State that KDVS 90.3FM is a Sacramento area station at 9200 watts, but it cannot be heard in some parts of Sacramento because 90.1 FM interferes with it. The station used to be heard in all of Sacramento, but since 90.1 FM came on the air, it causes so much interference that it essentially blocks the signal in some areas. (You may add other comments).

    Give Your First and Last Name
    Your Address
    Email Address

    Email your statement to todd@kdvs.org. with "INTERFERECE COMPLAINT" in the subject heading It will then be compiled with other letters and sent to the FCC jointly.

    You may also reach the FCC at their web site: www.fcc.gov. and make comments there

    KYCC's growing station list
    90.1 Stockton
    89.1 Livington
    89.7 Antioch/Pittburg
    90.5 Livermore
    91.1 Chico
    90.3 Dublin
    93.5 Vacaville
    87.7 Benicia
    90.1 Sacramento
    99.5 Elk Grove
    91.3 Provo Utah
    89.9 Alamogordo, NM
    89.1 El Paso, Texas
    88.3 Reno, NV

  33. GIGO by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What you hear on Eigenradio is the best of the New Music, distilled and de-correlated.
    One important thing I learned in my statistics classes was "Garbage In, Garbage Out", essentially that any system which is fed garbage will produce garbage as its result... Given that most new music is garbage, won't this merely produce garbage as its output?
  34. M3U by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    M3U is a text file containing a newline-delimited list of resource identifiers from which to stream audio or video. They can be URIs or local paths. XMMS, Winamp, and many other popular media players can handle M3U files; some save their playlists in this format.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  35. Re:Interesting name... by adrianbaugh · · Score: 5, Informative

    Eigen is a fairly well-established prefix in quantum mechanics (eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenstates etc.) An eigenstate is one of an infinite set of orthogonal solutions to a set of equations, an eigenvalue is a unique value (often energy) corresponding to a particular eigenstate. Thus I suspect in this case the term is supposed to mean something like "unique radio", which seems at least reasonably appropriate, if rather skewed. I suspect you're wrong about it being a comment on the state of the music industry, at least primarily. It seems like they're just using radio stations as a source of material 'cos it happens to be readily available. 'Course, the fact that it can't be much /worse/ than commercial radio is pretty ironic ;-)

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  36. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by esper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you haven't spent a lot of time with music like this, try it. If you hate it after 5 minutes, listen for 10. If you hate it after 10, listen for 20. Try to appreciate it.

    Uh, why? I checked eigenradio out a week or two back and, in addition to being boring as hell, it was physically painful to listen to. But I made myself stick with it for a bit, in an attempt to see what was so wonderful about it. I failed miserably.

    So, would you care to go beyond your admonition to "try to appreciate it" and tell us just what you think is there to appreciate? Is it just your "beautiful mindset" of believing the world to be overarchingly ordered or is there some other reason you're telling us to continue listening to something we hate?

  37. Too Late by cheesee · · Score: 2, Funny

    When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it. Too late Eigenradio. The music industry has been doing this for years.

    --
    Got Shadowrun? Awakened Worlds
  38. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by skintigh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you just defined ambient music.

    John Cage

  39. symphony? by Mr+Coffee+Cup · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'makes its optimal music by analyzing in real time dozens of radio stations at once. When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it. Since we listen to so much music all the time, Eigenradio is always on and always live.'

    That's all well and good, but what if more than half of those stations happen to be playing music that sucks? (even good stations use filler too..)

  40. Um.. It's a joke. Get it? by monk · · Score: 2, Informative

    The diagrams aren't intended to say anything, they're eye-noise just like the music is ear-noise. You're critiquing the ketchup stains on the table.

    If you need anymore clues we're here for ya, buddy.

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
  41. Re:Interesting name... by phliar · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Eigen" in german means "essence of", "characteristic", "similar" etc. The term comes from linear algebra, not quantum mechanics. If x is a vector and A is an operator, and A x (A applied to x) has the same direction as x, then x is an eigenvector of A. For example, if the operation is "reflect in the xy plane", then any vector parallel to the z-axis is an eigenvector of the operator. The scalar that x gets scaled by is called its eigenvalue. For the reflection operator, -1 is the eigenvalue for any eigenvector. QM extended this concept to other objects like states.

    So the term eigenmusic could be used to describe the underlying defining characteristic of a music. You could say that all Britney Spears' music has the same eigenmusic.

    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  42. I think you misunderstood. by zCyl · · Score: 3, Funny

    What makes you think that the slashdot effect changes the content of the music?

    Actually, I think what he was trying to say was something along the lines of:

    In Soviet Russia, music slashdots you.

  43. Glimpse of the future? by Kassiopeia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm slightly scared. This is a technological curiosity of its own might, granted, but this prompts me to envision a rather gloom future. Originally I've thought that the rise of networking would eliminate the entire corporate structure involved in music-making and be replaced with system where everyone can give a go at composing, publish their work online and where the best artists could probably managed to make quite a fortune with voluntary donations.

    However, could record companies do the ultimate thing, a la Nineteen Eighty-Four, and create a computer program that produces the music most of us want to hear? Would that mean the end of human creativity on that level of play, or would this algorithm be doomed to failure? It might only take a few years to adjust, and you'd end up liking it.

    Of course, a prudent question is, if music can be replicated so easily, what's the point in appreaciating it any longer, as it's clearly something even machines can do well...

    Next up: television series writing machines. But, oh wait, we already have reality tv...

  44. common base for musical taste? by ratfynk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So if you listen to modern Turkish in 7/4 and a 4 beat rock. Though in a little Jamaica and you will get Garth Brooks? Whenever you try to quantify music to find the ultimate groove you will get the ultimate in mediocre shlock. I once really tried to listen to an ultra post modern new music concert. The host stated that the music was written in a post modern a-tonal non serial fashion and was a-rythmic generated chance. The composer had then orchestrated some of the results. After really giving the music full attention and every chance to do something for me, I came to the conclusion that the result was decidedly A MUSICAL. I also came to the conclusion that the school of music that this composer was associated with was filled with air heads behind desks that most likely gave up actually playing real musical instruments after graduating from where ever. The musicians in the Orchestra gave it their best shot, which was rather sad. The applause was perfunctory so the lack of an encore was very much appreciated. If the composer/conductor had prepared one it will just have to wait.

    Statistical analysis is just not the way to write music, except perhaps for tone deaf nerds, and record execs. You have every right to play whatever form of music you choose. I have every right to listen to something else! If it got groove I do not care. I have never heard any computer generated music that can even come close to a great composer or musician, the differences are obvious. What appeals to the audiance is never the way to write music. It is how to please record companies, but is artless garbage that is as quickly forgotten as fast as it is created.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  45. cute, but trivial application of PCA by mooface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who takes an intermediate signal processing class learns about Princ. Component Analysis (PCA). Loosely, it attempts to represent a set of signals as weighted, linear combinations of sub-signals..... The technique allows you to find the pieces of signal that are common to the overall set. In this case I'm sure they are lining up some radio feeds, performing PCA, doing a little trivial stuff to it, and synthesizing their own "music" based on some transformation of the PCA weights and computed vectors. Not a big deal -- more like a one afternoon project for a grad student, or maybe a class project for a few undergrads...

  46. wonderful organized noise is good, try Aphex Twin by gasgesgos · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aphex Twin's music has done this for me. At first it just sounds like crappy noise randomly generated, but then you just "get it"...

    Aphex Twin's music spans all forms of electronic music, Selected Ambient Works Vol. 2 is an incredibly WONDERFUL bedtime album, while Drukqs is a great album while working... There's something about the almost chaotic aspect of it that keeps my mind focused.

    It's tough to go back to listening to mainstream radio after experiencing music that changes a person's perspective.

    To anyone who ignores/avoids ambient music, or music like most of the Aphex Twin library, I give the same advice, just keep listening, and wait... Eventually, it'll just click, and you win.

  47. Bit Torrent Mirror Up by arctan1701 · · Score: 2, Informative

    here are two sample mp3's from when i could access the servers. i'll keep the torrents up for a couple of hours or until the server dies...

    .zip of two .torrent files

  48. Random rant about this kind of music analysis by Daniel_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Computers writing music will never happen. At some level, it will always be people using computers as tools to write music. But we have that already (ie Mixing of music).

    First off, this is a single aleotoric (sp?) composition that is extremely similar to John Cage's 'radio symphony' produced a while ago (I don't remember the date or the exact title, but I'm sure someone will correct (or flame) me about it :-)) What classifies this as a music composition? It makes a number of algorithmic choices to create a new sound.

    Even with the lack of posted details about the algorithm, there are a number of assumptions in the algorithm that explain some of the impressions reported on Slashdot.

    "Eigenradio plays only the most important frequencies..." - right off the bat, we're assuming that frequencies are important to how we listen to music. Research in psychoacoustics suggests that this isn't the case - we stream music into 'parts' organized by the start and stop points of frequency bands. These streams are then processed for whether the pitch/timbre/rhythm patterns are recognized or not. This is partially demonstrated by the way we talk of 'voices' or 'instruments' having pitch and color (timbre) and of particular songs having 'a good groove'. Any diagram describing this kind of process would have feedback accross the whole diagram, so I doubt its a part of the algorithm used.

    "...only the beats with the highest entropy..." Repetition is a feature of all music everywhere - the only musical universal known. Similarly, the 'ideal' degree of entropy in music (how much it repeats) tends to be suprisingly high - music with the highest entropy is actually 'bad'. This differs from culture to culture, but low entropy in good music is the norm, not the exception. Music that has 'high entropy' as a feature already have two strikes against it.

    "If you took a bunch of music and asked it, 'Music, what are you, really?' you'd hear Eigenradio singing back at you." This assumes that all music is uniform and can be summaraized into a single source. Contrary to this assumption, there are significant differences between genre types - they exploit different mechanisms for producing pleasure in their listeners. This doesn't even begin to touch non-Western music (even non western pop music). Some of these mechanisms are mutually exclusive (polyphonic music versus homophonic music). An 'average' or 'distilled' reproduction ends up activating no psychological hooks very well and ends up sounding boring.

    "They know what you really want to hear. " This assumes that the creator can know what "music" is for you. Each culture hears music differently - with different qualifications for what makes music 'good'. Brain scans of trained classical musicians and their untrained counterparts conducted both in Japan and in the US demonstrated differences in the way these sounds were processed among the four groups. The differences between trained and untrained listeners was radical. Not only do tastes differ, but the music you hear is not the same music I hear - even if the same sound is presented. No single piece of music can legitimately make this claim.

    --
    The number you have dialed is imaginary, please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
  49. Eigenradio is to music as... by leftie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Cmdr. Data is to stand-up comedy. ("Take my Worf, please.") Technically, this is not an original concept, as Data basically was doing almost exactly this in one scene in an episode. He had like 7 different pieces of music playing cranked at the same time that he was listening to/analysing when LeForge entered the scene and screamed at him to make it stop (or at least just play one... or something like that). 1) I agree with LeForge on this. Make it stop. 2) Does this mean Universal has a copyright for Eigenradio already?

  50. I think I've come to a conclusion.... by popmaker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Humans can make music using computers.
    Computers can't make music using computers.

    Or even radio stations.

    The very idea is disgusting. Has people forgot how
    good real and sincere music, played live by people
    playing it for the love of it sounds like?
    This only reminds how disgutingly consumer-based
    our society is.

  51. Ring Mod? by gidds · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone else find that sort of metallic noise familiar? It sounds uncannily like the effect of an audio processor called a ring modulator - also known as a multiplier. What's the betting they're just multiplying together all the inputs?

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.