Slashdot Mirror


Armageddon... in 2014. Almost.

anetic was among several to note a story making the rounds striking fear into the hearts of many. Armageddon will just barely miss us, so make sure to get your panic in the streets over with early.

26 of 537 comments (clear)

  1. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't need to worry about the unix 2038 time problem??

  2. What about another icon: by rainer_d · · Score: 5, Funny
    NEOs

    Near Earth Objects

    A mugshot of Bruce Willis as icon will draw the right associations.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  3. Obvious Bruce Willis Comment by pklong · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look at the bright side, Bruce Willis will drill it AND he won't be coming back.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  4. Project Orion anyone??? by advocate_one · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Time to dust off those schematics for the Orion lifter... the only thing that has the capability of lifting enough nukes into an intercept course to hit it early enough to get a good deflection vector. Of course the eco freaks won't like the idea of Orion being nuclear powered...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Project Orion anyone??? by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny
      Of course the eco freaks won't like the idea of Orion being nuclear powered...

      And rightly so. Nuclear power is an unnecessary and eco-unfriendly option. Whale blubber, dolphin snouts and bear cub hides make a far more efficent fuel when burnt.

  5. Why Panic the Masses? by aeinome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you even alert the masses of this? Saying "We were almost all going to die" is akin to saying "You were almost murdered." That would panic the person(s) a lot, and if you didn't tell them they would've been completely happy and fine. Remember, ignorance is bliss!

    --
    When you don't have a leg to stand on, don't even get up.
  6. But Granny I'm still kinda affraid by KrunZ · · Score: 5, Funny
    "The rock is said to measure approximately 1.2 kilometres (less than a mile) across - only one tenth of the size of the meteor thought to have wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago"

    ... yeah but I'm am even less than one tenth the size of a dinosaur...

  7. If you're not scared.... by Reggyt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here at NASA JPL http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2003qq47.html is the risk summary.

    but the brits are playing it down here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3200019.stm

    Hmmmmmm now where did I put that Anderson shelter?

    --
    "Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down in the mind before you reach 18" Einstein
  8. And posted in Askslashdot... by confused+one · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What should an enterprising geek stock an underground shelter with? What would /. users suggest?

    1. Re:And posted in Askslashdot... by khcm8jw · · Score: 5, Funny

      A windup powersource and a storage device capable of mirroring the internet, oh and some beer

      --
      "They locked up a man who wanted to rule the world, the fools, they locked up the wrong man! L.Cohen
  9. Re:Chances likely to change? by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's 909,000:1 that it will miss us, but there's only a 50:50 chance that's right.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  10. Re:"just barely miss us"? by nich37ways · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bruce Willis can stay put.

    Lets send him anyway..
    --
    37 - what does it stand for really...
  11. Re:Yay for Slashdot! by BaggedOutKen · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's SCO's final solution.

  12. The odds by raider_red · · Score: 5, Funny

    At 1 in 909,000, you're still much more likely to be hit by an asteroid than you are to win PowerBall.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  13. Why did they name it 'double-Q-forty-seven' by madmarcel · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to wonder how they (them, you-know-who ;)
    came up with a name for this massive rock...given the chances that it will hit us, you'd have thought that they'd come up with something more imaginative...
    (For good examples, please see relevant crap doomsday movies or scifi novels ;)

    In a situation like this, I'd recommend what any other geek would: We need a slashdot Poll!

    "Most appropriate name for a massive rock that will most likely possibly maybe destroy all life on earth:

    A) EarthCrusher
    B) Foot of God
    C) StarHammer
    D) SCO's Laywers' Bill
    E) DinosaurKiller
    F) .....
    G) CowboyNeal's Booger

  14. Re:A new scale? by ozbon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah, but perhaps this NEO is the One? *grin*

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  15. With apologies to Stanley Kubrick... by kilonad · · Score: 5, Funny

    General "Buck" Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?

    Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

    Ambassador de Sadesky: I must confess, you have an astonishingly good idea there, Doctor.

  16. More sensationalist crap by FlukeMeister · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, looking at the NASA NEO page (http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/2003qq47.html) shows the actual probability of 2003 QQ47 impacting the Earth in 2014 is 1 in 1.754 million, the highest isolated probability. The BBC's figure of 1 in 909000 is the cumulative probability of the asteroid impacting the Earth in the next century.

    2003 QQ47 only merits a 1 on the Torino scale. That's the same rating given to random events. For anyone to get upset, you'd be looking for at least a 3 (out of 10) which is a 1% chance of a collision and some regional destruction. Compare this to a 10, which is guaranteed collision and global climatic catastrophe. A 10 event on the Torino scale happens every thousand centuries or so.

    Journalists really ought to at least try and understand their subject matter before committing their thoughts to be distributed to the general public. They have a duty of responsibility to ensure that data of limited significance is not represented as some twisted interpretation of a coming apocalypse.

  17. Near Miss?? by Mononoke · · Score: 5, Funny
    They say that if two airplanes almost collide, it's a near miss. Bullshit, my friend, it's a near hit! A collision is a near miss - [WHAM! CRUNCH!]
    "Look! They nearly missed!"
    "Yes, but not quite."
    --George Carlin

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  18. I know statistics!! You can't fool me by RevMike · · Score: 5, Funny
    There are approximately 6 billion people on Earth. The odds of this asteroid striking are 1 in 909,000. By my calculations 6,601 people will be struck by this asteroid!

    Why isn't anyone doing anything!!

  19. Nukes will not work for sponge-like asteriods by maharg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'Horizon' on the BBC covered this issue a while back - see http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2003/armagedd on.shtml

    A quote from the link above:

    Asteroids like sponges

    Three years ago, the residents of Tagish Lake in northern Canada witnessed a bright explosion in the sky, as an asteroid burned up in the atmosphere above them. Jim Brook was lucky enough to find debris from the impact. The first thing he noticed was that it was far lighter than he expected it would be. Like a sponge, the chunks of debris were mostly air.

    Dan Durdan makes his living by firing ball bearings at asteroid samples - meteorites - to study what happens when they are hit. When he tested samples similar to the Tagish Lake meteorite, he was surprised to see that, rather than shattering or being deflected, these less dense asteroids simply absorbed the impact of the blast.

    These results were worrying. This could mean that many asteroids would not be deflected by a nuclear blast. Trying to deflect an asteroid with a blast might have no effect, and would keep it coming on its deadly trajectory.


    The programme also covered an alternative solution (another quote..)

    The power of the Sun

    Jay Meloch has suggested a radical new way of dealing with a dangerous asteroid. He wanted a surer, more controlled way of diverting a large body - with a gentle push instead of a blast. His idea was to find a way of harnessing the biggest power source in the Solar System - the Sun.

    In the same way as you can use a magnifying glass to set fire to a sheet of paper, you could focus the Sun's rays onto a point on the surface on an asteroid. The spot where the Sun's rays met would heat up, blasting particles of the asteroid into space. This would act like a rocket engine, and might be enough nudge the asteroid out of harm's way.

    The scientific community ridiculed his suggestion - until Meloch received a phone call from someone who took his idea very seriously. The US military already uses collectors like Meloch's to gather radio waves. Meloch may well have come up with a suggestion that will one day save the Earth.


    --

    $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
    @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
  20. Re:Chances likely to change? by Helpless+Will · · Score: 5, Informative

    Terry Pratchet and British satirist. In his Discworld series of books one of the running jokes is the way that "million to one" chances are almost always a dead certainty.

    It's further explained by his theory of "narrative causality" that is a sufficiently good story can impact reality in such a fashion as to bring the conditons of "reality" closer to that in the narrative.

    The idea here being, how often in some story do they say "It's a million to one chance, but it just might work," and then, like magic it happens.

    Check out;

    http://www.ie.lspace.org/

    for an idea of what he's all about. He's one of my favorite authors.

    -H

    --
    "If there's anything more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now." -- Z. Beeblebrox
  21. Ob. Terry Pratchet reference by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vimes: Does this mean I'm going to die?

    Death: POSSIBLY.

    Vimes: You turn up when people are possibly going to die?

    Death: OH YES. IT'S QUITE THE NEW THING. IT'S BECAUSE OF THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE.

    Vimes: What's that?

    Death: I'M NOT SURE.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  22. Re:Chances likely to change? by john82 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... or your so-called data points! This is just an opinion forum. Informed opinions have no place here.

  23. Pertubations by NickRuisi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I was looking over the JPL's orbital elements and diagrams for this object (here), and I noticed the following:

    15 March 2005: The object will be .082 AU from earth.
    24 September 2012: The object will pass within 0.098 AU of earth.

    I also noticed (if I am reading the orbital diagrams correctly) that the points where the object is closest to the earth coincide with the points where the object passes through the plane of the ecliptic. Since these are the Acending / Decending nodes of a solar orbit, wouldn't this point be ideal for a change of orbital plane? I'm thinking these near-Earth encounters may change the object's orbit somewhat, since surely the earth encounters will impart some delta-v on the object.

    Anyone else up on orbital mechanics care to take a better look at the ephermis?
  24. Re:Chances likely to change? by weeboo0104 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Suppose I have rolled 10 six-sided dice

    What for? Save vs. huge-ass rock?

    (My apologies to all the AD&D players out there)

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass