Slashdot Mirror


iMovie 3 & iDVD: The Missing Manual

honestpuck writes "As digital video cameras spawn in the hands of you, me, parents and tourists like cockroaches in my kitchen we find ourselves needing the kind of technical and aesthetic help not really seen since the advent of 'desktop publishing'. Once again a 'Missing Manual' has come to my help." Read on for honestpuck's review of David Pogue's iMovie 3 & iDVD: The Missing Manual. iMovie 3 & iDVD: The Missing Manual author David Pogue pages 456 publisher Pogue Press/O'Reilly rating 7 - Good book, some flaws reviewer Tony Williams ISBN 0596005075 summary A quality introduction to two closely tied products.

I have previously reviewed iPhoto2: The Missing Manual and said "The target audience for this book would probably be a little less technical than myself or the average Slashdot reader, however when I find myself in a field I don't understand well I don't mind a little stuff for the absolute newbie" -- and once again this is true. iMovie 3 & iDVD: The Missing Manual finds me in an area where I am technically inferior. Once again I truly appreciated this book and its style.

The book is broken up into four sections, one devoted to video cameras and shooting a movie, a large one on editing in iMovie 3, and smaller sections on exporting out of iMovie 3 and on using iDVD. At the end are two useful appendices: the first is a menu-by-menu look at iMovie 3, and the second is an iMovie 3 troubleshooting guide. The latter is often needed and always useful -- iMovie 3 still has more than one bug.

The first section gives a great deal of incredibly useful information about video cameras and how to use them, including hints on various types of shooting such as sporting events, interviews and weddings. The technical information on cameras is perfect if you have yet to buy a camera, including a guide to which features are essential and which unnecessary as you can do the same thing (only better) in iMovie 3. When it goes on to the 'how to shoot' section, you get pretty much the same advice you'll get anywhere, but since we didn't really read all of from the last book on video we read (and forgot half the bits we did read) it's nice to have it there again.

The second section does a good job of explaining the details of iMovie 3, even down to some of its shortcomings and bugs. I also appreciated the way it spent as much time on improving the quality of the finished film as it did telling me how to use the various parts of the software. It follows a logical sequence through the movie-making process, giving good details on how iMovie does the job, how to get the best result and what sort of things to avoid -- particularly useful for things like transitions and effects when less is best.

The third section, titled "Finding Your Audience," is a bit more of a problem. It really has nothing to do with finding an audience and a lot more to do with QuickTime. The section first spends ten pages telling us how to get our edited film back onto the camcorder or onto a VCR, then it spends a lot of time dealing with exporting to QuickTime, including posting movies to the web and some info on using the QuickTime player, including some "tricks" with QuickTime Player Pro.

The attention to the finished product in the second section carries through to the fourth section on iDVD, though the writing here is not quite as good. It is incredibly informative, however. I learned a great deal about putting together all sorts of iDVD projects, including ways of customizing almost every aspect of the finished product.

O'Reilly have the usual marketing stuff while Pogue Press have the handy little Missing CD section with links to all the free and shareware software mentioned in the book. Neither has a sample chapter or the table of contents, you can't even get either at Amazon.

One of the drawbacks of getting free software is that we don't get good free documentation. One of the benefits of free software is that we can choose which 'documentation' to buy. Some people might prefer the style of the 'Dummies' books, others the style of Peachpit's Visual Quickstart Guide. I've had a look at all three and like the balance of depth and explanation that Pogue has in his 'Missing Manual' series. I once again find myself recommending a 'Missing Manual' to everyone. While catering to the beginner, this book goes deep enough that all but the most long-term user of these two pieces of software will find something to learn in this volume.

You can purchase iMovie 3 & iDVD: The Missing Manual from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

112 comments

  1. Apple Gouging its customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Think about it. They sell the computer and software with missing manuals, then you have to find and buy it separately.

    Why was it missing in the first place, Mr. Jobs?

    1. Re:Apple Gouging its customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Think about it. They sell the computer and software with missing manuals, then you have to find and buy it separately.

      Because they don't really need a manual? Most of these included MacOS X apps are so trivial that there's only so much you can do with them, much less write a manual for. The online help should be sufficient.

    2. Re:Apple Gouging its customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      For what it's worth, there is an EXCELLENT help manual in iMovie AND iDVD just under the HELP menu in each program. Complete with video examples and tutorials. Now be a nice Troll and go back to playing with your wintendo.

    3. Re:Apple Gouging its customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I was trying for "Funny", not "Insightful".

      It was a joke.

      iMovie and iDVD are self-explanatory for even the most inexperienced user.

    4. Re:Apple Gouging its customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many peieces of software (that are bundled with the purchase of the computer/OS) come with an in depth manual? I don't know if I can think of one. Just a thought.

    5. Re:Apple Gouging its customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is IE, Solitare, Minesweeper, Media Player, DirectX, Netmeeting, Wordpad, Notepad, and many other on the Windows side. Is that really "free"?

    6. Re:Apple Gouging its customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you please point me in the direction of the Minesweeper manual? Thanks.

  2. Manual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You really NEED a manual for these programs? Ouch!

  3. Cockroaches... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 5, Funny

    As digital video cameras spawn in the hands of you, me, parents and tourists like cockroaches in my kitchen....

    Seriously, rather than buying a digital video camera you might consider finding a nicer place to live. Or at least call Orkin for cryin' out loud.

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
    1. Re:Cockroaches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should also consider buying a dictionary to look up the word spawn and a grammar guide to fix the awkwardness of his sentece.

    2. Re:Cockroaches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He should also consider buying a dictionary to look up the word spawn and a grammar guide to fix the awkwardness of his sentece.

      Perhaps when he gets his dictionary he can teach you to spell "sentence".

    3. Re:Cockroaches... by in7ane · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could we please see a video of the said cockroaches spawning in your kitchen?

      /imagines a monster respawning in doom

    4. Re:Cockroaches... by kingLatency · · Score: 1

      Don't be snooty. Even nice apartments in some places can have cockroaches.

      --
      "I've got to stop masturbating! It makes me too lazy! Stop it, Albert. Stop it." -- Albert Einstein
  4. Get it from just $17.47! by anonymous+coword · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Get it from just $17.47! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just go to Bookpool and get it for $15.95...

    2. Re:Get it from just $17.47! by blackmonday · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bookpool should always be your first search for prices on tech books. Serously. It's 15.95 over there. Don't work there, but I buy all my tech books from them.

  5. Re:Um say what? by b-baggins · · Score: 3, Informative

    iDVD comes with its own on-line help system. It's a Mac, not gentoo Linux for crying out loud. You don't NEED a 300 page manual to use it.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  6. Good book by djupedal · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just bought a copy from the local Apple Store. Worth every penny. Humourous.

    I especially appreciated the admonition to buy DVD Studio Pro if you need anything more than the toy apps that are part of Apple's iLife suite. iDVD is nice, but it is limited, and not meant for serious work. Same w/iMovie, etc. Great starter apps...lousy production tools :)

    1. Re:Good book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iLife isn't intended to be professional level production software. They are intended for the consumer and as an added perk for buying a Mac, if you want Po level tools, check out http://www.apple.com/software/pro/

    2. Re:Good book by djupedal · · Score: 1

      >iLife isn't intended to be professional level production software.

      I think I just said that...I think I just said that :)

    3. Re:Good book by Cirrocco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, but there ARE some nifty things you can do with it if you work hard enough at it.
      Example: Here's a short movie I put together (10 secs, 5.9 MB) I was trying to find a way to add lightsaber effects to my videos without having to purchase Adobe products. So here's what I did:

      I shot the video and imported it into iMovie. (BTW, I'm using iMovie 2.03 on Mac OS 9.1) I exported it with the Sorenson codec after turning it into B&W (I thought it would be cool to have B&W video but a nice green-glowing lightsaber) I moved the movie over to my Linux box and used MPlayer (do I get bonus points for incorporating another topic on the homepage?) to split the video into individual frames. From there I imported the frames into the GIMP and used the Perl-Fu plug-in 'lightsaber' (from jfedor.org...thanks for making that! You rule!) and added the effect to each frame individually.

      I then imported the individual frames back into iMovie (as 1 frame stills) and turned it back into a movie.

      Yes, this took friggin' forever. About 4 hours for 10 lousy seconds of video. (However, had I known about the ability to assign keyboard shortcuts to any menu item under the GIMP it would have saved me a lot of right-clicking on the image)

      But in the end I did NOT have to use an Adobe product, neither Premiere NOR After Effects.

      BTW, if anyone can tell me a simpler way to do this I'm listening! But, yeah, if you have the GIMP you could potentially do some incredible stuff with iMovie.

    4. Re:Good book by djupedal · · Score: 1

      There are tons of free tools, filters, sounds etc. that can add to the things you can do w/iMove/iDVD. Your example is a good one.

      I'm in the middle of a 15 minute (iDVD) wedding DVD/video for some friends. They tell me these things go for $500.00. One job at that rate, would pay for DVD Studio Pro :)

    5. Re:Good book by Cirrocco · · Score: 1

      Good luck to you! I hope it pays off!

      Keep in mind that iMovie (well, iMovie 2.0.3, anyway) can import only mp3's as sound files. BUT! There is the lame encoder and bladeenc. Lame is insanely fast on the command line (well, under Linux anyway) turning .wav's into mp3's, and there must be a .wav file for just about everything under the friggin' sun out there!

      So import your wav's to where your lame encoder is THEN import them into iMovie as mp3's.

      Say...I don't suppose you could point me in the direction of some of those plug-ins, could you?

  7. Re:Um say what? by pla · · Score: 1

    A product which doesn't come with its own manual? Wow that's useful. Now I'll rush out and buy an iDVD [whatever that is] *and* the iNot iIncluded iManual for an additional low price...

    I don't know if the original post meant it in this way, but buying a 3rd party book to replace a so-called "missing manual" usually happens as a euphemism for "I pirated the software and don't already know how to use it".

    In this case, I don't think he meant that, but at the very least the book's author presumeably knew this and used the association to pick his title.

  8. Re:ummm, just a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be prepared to be flamed into oblivion.

  9. Re:ummm, just a point by jkabbe · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Have you seen the stats? 90% of slashdot users use windows or mac's ..
    Not saying that nobody here is a tech, but honestly, the majority are actually not really techs.


    Your assumption seems to be that someone who uses a Windows or Mac machine is not technical. Care to back that up?

  10. That's the open source way.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay for documentation and support.

    But what it really comes down to with most of you is free beer. You want free software, free documentation, AND free support.

    Whenever one of those three is not free, you complain that you are getting ripped off.

    Besides iDVD has an extensive on-line help system.

    1. Re:That's the open source way.... by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Troll

      "free beer."

      I don't drink. However, I am of the philosophy that if you are going todo some work you might as well do it right or not at all.

      The manuals should detail the entire application. However, nobody said it had to be a piece of art. like most man pages in *nix userland tools, be terse but complete. If people need more help then you pay.

      But just providing

      pp. 1 -- Welcome to iProduct.
      pp. 2 -- Send money to:
      pp. 3 -- Index [etc... backcover]

      isn't very professional.

      That being said I don't use MACs so I use every chance I get to say something bad about them. Like "macs suck" and "you suck for liking macs".

      Now if I could only figure out why I don't have any friends...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:That's the open source way.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MACs are network adapter addresses, we get work done with Macs. Don't mean to split hairs...errr....yes I do. :)

    3. Re:That's the open source way.... by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't have "hair" either....

      Whatever... arrg.. existance... why can't a bus just skip a curb once...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:That's the open source way.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you you goddamn iManham canner. So, are you writing the missing manual for iMangoo iBottler?

    5. Re:That's the open source way.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could just walk out in front of one. That would rule.

  11. Re:Um say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have used imovie quite a few times and the built in manual and tutorials were good enough to get me started

  12. Re:Um say what? by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Insightful
    [yes this is flamebait and yes I hate stupid people who buy incomplete products then rant about how great they are....]
    You missed where it said this was free software.

    They'd only be stupid if they tried to get their money back. You, however, would be stupid for commenting on something you know nothing about.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  13. Re:ummm, just a point by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

    I just had to point this out:

    joeldg wrote:
    Have you seen the stats? 90% of slashdot users use windows or mac's .. Not saying that nobody here is a tech, but honestly, the majority are actually not really techs.

    Then in his next post wrote:
    on a linux-centric site... I shouldn't have to.

    Genious!

  14. Translation of above by mveloso · · Score: 4, Funny

    I spent all this money on a PC, and all this time learning Linux, and I'm still not cool?

    1. Re:Translation of above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you base your opinion of yourself or someone else on their choice of operating system, you deserve to have the shit life you lead.

      Plus ca change.

  15. Re:ummm, just a point by p4ul13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have you seen the stats? 90% of slashdot users use windows or mac's ..
    Not saying that nobody here is a tech, but honestly, the majority are actually not really techs.


    I'm not sure I see the connection. You're infering that because the majority of the slashdot readers use the most widely used operating systems to read this site, that they're not technically adept?

    As much as I might enjoy working with *nix systems at work; the fact that my workstation and home machine are Windows and Mac respectively doesn't have anything to do with my or anybodys tech-iosity. (End Rant)

    I've found that the iApps are pretty intuitive for most of the stuff you'd want to do with them. With some playing around and a quick check of their included help screens you can figure most basic stuff out. In other words I don't think a manual needs to be included (No manuals to be found with most linux / windows bundled programs anyway); but the fact that O-Reily chose to publish one will likely benefit folks who want to dig deeper into these Apps features.

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
  16. Re:ummm, just a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Have you seen the stats? 90% of slashdot users use windows or mac's ..
    Not saying that nobody here is a tech, but honestly, the majority are actually not really techs.

    This is the truth, even though many people tend to brush it off as nonsense.
    I have lots of non-techie friends who visit /. at least 3 times a day. These are regular users who aren't really computer savvy outside of Windows or Macs. Slashdot is great when you set your threshold to +5 and read the articles with comments. That way you know most of the stuff that's too technical gets filtered out and general posts which don't explain something at detail get left behind.

    I also browse at +5 whenever I'm short on time and want a quick rundown of days articles. Otherwise, it's 0-threshold on regular days.
  17. Re:What's the deal with Apple fans anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some valid points made there, but OS X is lovely to look at (sure it may be slow).

    True, zealots are bad for any OS / computer.

  18. The real missing manual by Reverend528 · · Score: 5, Funny

    man imovie man idvd

  19. The "i"'s have it. by fr2asbury · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All these little i's in the posts are giving me flashbacks of my early days with my TI-99/4A
    when my dad tried in vain to teach me to program.

    100 for i=1 to 10
    110 print i
    120 i=i+1
    130 if i11 goto 100
    140 end

    yup, fun stuff.

  20. Incomplete by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Funny
    Where's the chapter on homemade pr0n?

    Or does he know his audience?

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Incomplete by winkydink · · Score: 1, Funny

      If the audience to which you refer is /. posters, why on earth would you want to film yourself masturbating, since that is about the only sex most /.'ers have.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:Incomplete by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

      Which, of course, was my implied humor as opposed to your blatant spelling out it it.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  21. Re:ummm, just a point by BigDumbAnimal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This discussion is tiresome and off topic at best, but to review here are some points

    Many /. readers read from work where they are forced to use windows.

    I use windows and mac and I am every bit as technically proficient as you "average" linux user.

    (posted using opera on linux from a dual boot machine behind a linux firewall)

  22. Have you ever tried the software? by winkydink · · Score: 1, Interesting
    iMovie doesn't need a manual, pure and simple. If you want to extract digital video and put together clips, it's very intuitive (heck, even my computer-phobic wife figured it out).

    If you want to figure out how to do neat and nifty things with iMovie, buy the Missing Manual book, but you certainly don't need it to use the software.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  23. Wow! by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

    I haven't heard of David Pogue in years... I have always liked his writings. He use to write on the last page of MacWorld every month, but got replaced by some other (not as good) guy.

    Anyone ever read Hard Drive by Pogue?

    1. Re:Wow! by scrod · · Score: 4, Funny
      I haven't heard of David Pogue in years... I have always liked his writings. He use to write on the last page of MacWorld every month, but got replaced by some other (not as good) guy.

      Yeah, after he stopped writing for the back page of MacWorld he just kind of disappeared, huh? If only the New York Times were as prestigious a publication.
    2. Re:Wow! by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Yes, with the voice-operated missile tested with a live warhead, running on a macintosh quadra.

      a virus, written in 68k assembler, which was translated by something much like apple's macintosh application environment into something that automagically runs on ANY unix system!

  24. Re:ummm, just a point by joeldg · · Score: 1

    :) it is..
    a lot of the "readers" are non-techs, you cannot blanket say that there is some magic average of "techiness" on this site when I know for a fact that a lot of middle-mngt (who know how to use ms-word and that excel.. and know a few options in outlook) read here to see what is "hot" etc..
    This *is* (or was) the center to get linux news and events. As a user who works 100% on linux system and runs it at home and has not run windows in years (I don't have time to play games much these day) dealing with the "average" windows user is more of a chore than anything.
    Again.. note my word choice of "average"..

    cheers

  25. IMovie by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reading all the posts about if Mac users are techincal or not. The real issue is what happens when you do something "Non-Standard" that seems logical.

    I've had a hell of a time, trying to figure out why 16:9 DV video wouldnt work correctly in iMovie. Seems 16:9 isnt supported even thou sony handycams support it, and seem to be a very popular brand. So now I'm stuck with 16:9 video I cant use on my expensive mac. Being told I need to buy $1000 dollars worth of software to use the video.

    Also, why You cant just export into Mpeg2 and have some good utiltiies to cut/chop the video.

    Many things I can do under linux and windows, just seem impossible to do with standard tools, or the "Trick" to get something done isnt known to a new mac user.

    Why did I buy a mac? Wanted to test out all the features, and ease of use, and play with OSX. There is alot of power there, but there are many missing features, or alternative methods to get a task done. You can dumb down help guids too much, and Apples help file is on par with "Idiots howto Guides". This book is on my must buy list.

    1. Re:IMovie by Blademan007 · · Score: 1

      Most apprec. I too have a Sony and shot some recent stuff in 16:9. At least I know it ain't gonna work with a i-stuff... :)

    2. Re:IMovie by Eponymous,+Showered · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Windows Movie Maker supports 16:9. I've done 16:9 from camcorder to MSWMM to TMpegEnc to DVD (via Sonic's MyDVD) and the results are quite nice (as long as you let TMpegEnc chew on the file for a long while).

    3. Re:IMovie by DebianDog · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well while true to do "real" 16:9 editing you would at least need Final Cut Express. But you would also need a true 16:9 camera. The Sony widescreen (16:9 format) is doing nothing more than limiting the video written to tape and actually you have much LESS video (lines of resolution) You are just cropping off the top and bottom. I have a "true" 16:9 camera (Sony VX-2000) BUT to actually get it to use the whole tape (true widescreen) is like a $700 upgrade to the lens.

      You can get around your issue in iMovie by using a 16:9 effect for your transitions, titles, and effects. Available from both GeeThree or Stupendous software, as iMovie will not alter the original DV you pulled off tape.

      MPEG is a touchy subject for Apple and I am sure it has to do something with the licensing. You will get one of the best MPEG encoder is you buy either Final Cut Pro or DVD Studio Pro. It is called Compressor. Quicktime will crop your video anyway you want just not output to MPEG-2 without the MPEG-2 codec.

      I think once you start figuring your Mac out you will be much happier and if you actually pay for professional results you will get them. If you are tenacious enough the are PLENTY of free MPEG encoder available on VersionTracker. Here are the instructions.

      --
      Daniel C. Slagle
      Keeper of the "Unofficial" iMovie FAQ
      Tell Apple how you feel about iMovie

    4. Re:IMovie by mcwop · · Score: 1
      Some references to help with 16:9 aspect:

      First Link

      Second Link

      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    5. Re:IMovie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mpeg2 on Apple is a clusterfuck. Good luck.

    6. Re:IMovie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny I make them all the time. Maybe your the problem or just too stupid to figure it out?

    7. Re:IMovie by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      My experience has been similar to yours. Digital video is a pain to deal with on any platform and I was hoping OS X would help, but it didn't. iMovie was too limited to be useful and required far too much clicking around to get anything done and I couldn't get standard UNIX tools like dvgrab to work. And iMovie seemed to want to turn everything into some oddball formats.

      I just ended up installing Linux--it gives me far more video software, more powerful video software, and you can't beat the price.

      iMovie is for consumers trying to deal with simple home video at default settings. It's really good at that, but not much else. And I found OS X overall to be a disappointment. It looks great, though.

    8. Re:IMovie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mods this is a troll or terribly mis-informed post, please moderate accordingly.

      1) The only Sony Handycam that supports "True" 16:9 is the DCR-PC330 and has yet to ship, check it out so if you actually have this camera it would be interesting to find out how you acquired it. The other camera Sony sells that is in the palm camera format and does true 16:9 (not shoulder mounted) is the PDX10 which is ~US$3000.
      2) If you have a camera that does true 16:9 (which is a multi-thousand dollar camera) why are you using iMovie and not a pro-level suite? Why spend all that money on a camera and expect a bundled in software package to handle the capabilities of that camera? If you can afford that camera and a new Mac then I don't think the cost of Final Cut Express or even Final Cut Pro should break your bank.

      I suggest you check out camcorderinfo.com because you're losing resolution when you shoot in your camera's pseudo-widescreen resolution. If you think the widescreen format makes your home movies look cooler at least do it in post so it doesn't look like your movies were shot on VHS.

    9. Re:IMovie by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      No troll - Many of the Sony camera will shoot true widescreen understanding widescreen with the proper lens. There are lots of other cameras that will shoot widescreen. BTW: When my camera was new it was over $3000 (note second to last feature)

    10. Re:IMovie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't get standard UNIX tools like dvgrab to work.

      That's not surprising, as IIRC, dvgrab only works on Linux. "standard unix tool" it is not.

      And iMovie seemed to want to turn everything into some oddball formats.

      What oddball formats are you refering to?

      I just ended up installing Linux--it gives me far more video software, more powerful video software, and you can't beat the price.

      This is utterly laughable. What software are you refering to? Perhaps you can beat iMovie in terms of features, but are you trying to imply that Linux has something better than Final Cut on any level?

      iMovie is for consumers trying to deal with simple home video at default settings.

      Did anyone tell you any differently?

      I'm sorry, but it just sounds like your expectations were completely skewed going into it. Don't act like that should reflect badly on iMovie.

    11. Re:IMovie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's not surprising, as IIRC, dvgrab only works on Linux. "standard unix tool" it is not.

      But there are other command line tools for other versions of UNIX.

      What oddball formats are you refering to?

      Anything other than MJPEG, MPEG, MPEG2, MPEG4, or DV.

      [I just ended up installing Linux--it gives me far more video software, more powerful video software, and you can't beat the price.]

      This is utterly laughable. What software are you refering to? Perhaps you can beat iMovie in terms of features, but are you trying to imply that Linux has something better than Final Cut on any level?


      Final Cut is for "creative types" fiddling with video by hand. It may surprise you to know, but there are many other uses of video and many other ways of dealing with video. I write software that manipulates video. For that, iMovie turned out to be useless for capture and Final Cut would be way overpriced and over-featured. And, sadly, the rest of OS X isn't so hot for writing video-related software either, with lots of API holdovers from OS9 and lots of proprietary APIs.

      [iMovie is for consumers trying to deal with simple home video at default settings.] Did anyone tell you any differently?

      No. I took a gamble on the Mac and I lost. I frankly couldn't imagine that even a basic video editor would not let me load and save streams in MPEG format.

      I'm just sharing my experiences so others don't make the same mistake:

      • If you want video grabbing, iMovie won't do the trick because the output it saves is not very useful on other platforms.
      • If you want video editing, don't waste your time with iMovie, get Final Cut or something like it and budget for it (it ain't cheap).
      • If you want to do anything else with video, you're probably better off with a Linux or UNIX machine; the Mac is just too much work to program.

    12. Re:IMovie by titos · · Score: 1

      You may want to have a look at a quite reasonably priced program that does quite a lot: http://www.arboretum.com/products/hyperengine-av/h av_main.html True, this is the designer of the product writing here but I don't think I am doing any harm in expressing my belief that HyperEngine-AV is a lot more straightforward, intuitive and fun to use than many other apps. out there. Since this my very first appearance on an online forum, by all means mister moderator do let me know if I am doing anything wrong and feel free to act accordingly! Georges Jaroslaw

  26. Re:Um say what? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    "You, however, would be stupid for commenting on something you know nothing about."

    Really? This is /. afterall isn't it? Since when is "research" and "knowledge" prerequisits for sharing wisdom?

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  27. yes, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is among the worst novels I've ever read. The plot was stupid and unimaginative, the characters were dull, and it's rare to come across prose that cringe-inducing. Pogue was okay in MacWorld, though he tended to shrillness. He is not a fiction writer, however.

  28. Your dad failed by Nurlman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Your program won't work. It'll just keep prining out 1's indefinitely.

    (I'm assuming that you forgot or HTML ate your less-than sign in line 130. Even so, it still won't work.)

    You never closed your "for" loop with a "next." Instead, you cobbled together two ways of doing the same thing, repeatedly sending the program from line 130 to 100, where i gets re-set to 1 every time. You needed to either:

    100 for i=1 to 10; print i; next; end

    or:

    100 i=1
    110 print i; i=i+1
    120 if i=11 then end
    130 goto 110

    The second example is not particularly elegant, but it'll work.

    1. Re:Your dad failed by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      You're right, I forgot the next, and yes html gobbled my less than sign.
      That was over 20 years ago, so it's basically the equivelant of my grandma stating that all she got out of algebra was x=1 cow. ;-)
      Fortunately I got a lot more out of it than that.
      I lump my coding skills in with the same learning disability that seems to prevent me from really learning other languages. I can pick up a litle vocabulary, a little grammer, pronunciation is not problem at all, but there's no way that it all comes together in my head.

  29. Re:Apple == American greatness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    God Bless America

    We'll just stick with your most relevant statement.

    I hope you immediately boycott everything American - starting with Slashdot! ;-)

  30. Re:Um say what? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You don't NEED a 300 page manual to use it.

    Thats the problem, crippled manuals only get you so far. There are too many "Gotchas" on iDvd/iMovie that mess up the whole process. Step outside the "Basic" process of making a video, and you find out quick the need for some extend help files.

  31. Re: iDVD, etc. by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    I guess it depends on what you define as "serious work".
    I recently used the iMovie and iDVD combo to create some training videos (introduction to using and troubleshooting computers and our software builds on them, for daycare/childcare centers), and while it wasn't perfect - it worked out pretty well.

    I considered delving into DVD Studio Pro and Final Cut Pro, but the learning curve was more than I wanted to tackle for this project.

    The biggest annoyance I find with iDVD is the way it throws the stock intro movies "in your face", and practically begs you to use them with every movie disc you make. They're nice templates for home movies (kid's birthday or what-have-you), but you certainly want to skip them if you're doing anything more professional.

    There are some very nice add-on packs for iMovie though (Slick Transitions and EZEdia plug-in packs, for example), quite reasonably priced ($49 or so per volume, typically), that will greatly enhance the usability of the app.

    The EZedia ones, in particular, allow filming in front of a blue screen and adding background movies behind the subject in the original film, overlaying logos on your movie, and much more. This isn't really "toy" stuff - and it's much cheaper than buying Final Cut Pro.

  32. Re:ummm, just a point by iSwitched · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey - not here to argue with your point, sure there's all kinds of people who read /. -- I for one think that's fine, it's grown far too big over the years to be a clique.

    But I've seen this linux-centric nonsense far too many times over the years to just let it go anymore. This site is, was, and will probably remain "News for Nerds" -- just look at the topics on any given day: Space travel, physics, electronics, games, books, current events, political debate, legal issues, coverage of all computer platforms. WTF is linux-centric about all that?

    Granted, it is easy to mistake the sites, and its readerships pro-free-software stance for "linux-centric-ness", but sorry, you don't have to subscribe to any particular philosophy (or OS) to get a huge amount of entertaining, and sometimes even useful info here.

    --
    "That naive cube! How long must I suffer this!" --Sheldon J. Plankton
  33. Re:Um say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but you know you don't even have a Mac.

    You're not in the club. Go away, loser.

  34. Re 16:9 video, etc. by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    I haven't had reason to work with 16:9 aspect video yet myself (even though my Sony camcorder is capable of it), but I do recall seeing a discussion about this same issue you describe.

    It seems to me they said something about iMovie not supporting 16:9 aspect ratio itself, but it would still allow you to import the 16:9 video and would export it again, unaltered, when told to export the movie. This isn't great, but at least it's not butchering your video when it imports it. You just can't preview it properly while in iMovie (if I'm understanding what I read correctly).

    Most likely, Apple made a decision not to support 16:9 aspect in iMovie because it's their "consumer-grade" video editor (in some ways, a competitor to Microsoft's Movie Maker they include with Windows XP). Working with wide-screen format video is generally considered a "higher-end" filming project - and Apple would like you to spend the $'s for Final Cut Express or Pro for that sort of thing.

  35. O'Reilly Annoyances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Remember back in the day when, if an O'Reilly book existed on a given topic, it was guaranteed to be the hands-down must-have last-word on the subject?

    Now it's worthless Missing Manuals for Dummies in 21 Days. Can anyone pin-point the O'Reilly title that marked the beginning of the end?

    1. Re:O'Reilly Annoyances by kahei · · Score: 1


      I think it was around the time Java came out. Certainly, 'Java in a nutshell' was a mountain of mediocrity. And that was about the time O'R started mixing in 'friendly' books, like the nutshell ones, with their classic books.

      Also, they strayed from their classic subjects -- Perl! Linux! Sockets! to make books about excel and .net and so on. A sound economic decision but it diluted the quality of the books -- I wouldn't even think of turning to O'Reilly first for a .NET book, and I probably wouldn't go to them for a Java book either.

      So, they dumbed down, and they broadened out, and the effect was to dilute and obscure their core of great unix-oriented books.

      Oh well, whatever.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  36. Re: iDVD, etc. by SlamMan · · Score: 1

    Agreed about Final Cut, but the new version of DVD studio (1.5 was a bear) is really nice. It's encoding a project right now, as a matter of fact. Its got 3 different modes to let you get the right level of detail about your project, basic (similar to iDVD, extended and advanced.

    --
    Mod point free since 2001
  37. iMovie3 is crap by johnnyb · · Score: 1

    I have been totally annoyed with iMovie 3. One of the main problems I've had with it is that the dv files it produces appear to have major, major problems. I haven't found a non-mac player which will play the dv files (other file types are better, but you would think the "raw" format would be pretty good).

    My goal was to edit in iMovie (because our A/V equipment is hooked up to a Mac) and encode using MJPEGtools, but the output from iMovie was so broken it just didn't work.

    1. Re:iMovie3 is crap by scrod · · Score: 1

      I agree--it's considerably slower than previous versions of iMovie and actually crashes quite a bit. Actually, saying that it's considerably slower is an understatement. The app is so slow you sometimes wonder if it's even aware of the fact that it's supposed to occasionally respond to user interface events. After trying to use iMovie 3 for even 5 minutes, iMovie 2 suddenly becomes a dream to use again. I suggest you revert to the old version.

  38. There is a reason it doesnt have a manual by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    It dosen't need it. I've been using Mac OS X for about 2 years now. None of these applications need a manual.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  39. Re: iDVD, etc. by djupedal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too many users seem chagrined about not being able to create fluid epics via iDVD. I'm always amused by the ones that complain about the 60~90 minute limit of iDVD. It wasn't that long ago that it cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to push video around the way we can with iMovie and iDVD. I can make worthwhile video with both of them. Your expectations sound appropriate.

    While I would never attempt to catagorize one person's efforts, the line between hobby and serious is clear when the limits of the free apps are encountered. I have no issue with this practice. I can find out if I really want to go deep into video making without spending the money for FCP or DVDSP. Seems ironic, however, that to get the most out of the 'free' apps, you need to spend $$ to buy this book :)

    For those that think they're getting the world with the iLife suite, think again. After spending +/-$3k on the computer and +/-$2k on the camera, another grand or so for 'real' software seems fair.

  40. Re:Um say what? by pla · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but you know you don't even have a Mac.

    Which has what exactly to do with my statement?

    And, I'll have you know that I do have a Mac - A PPC7100 running Linux, but a Mac none-the-less.

    So... Pbpbpbpbpbpbtttttttt.

  41. Re: iDVD, etc. by QuantumSpritz · · Score: 0

    Consider Final Cut Express - much cheaper than FCP, has most of the features, at a much lower price point, and downright dirt cheap if you qualify for an academic license.

  42. The iLife suite isn't marketed at pros, period by ianscot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Too many users seem chagrined about not being able to create fluid epics via iDVD. I'm always amused by the ones that complain about the 60~90 minute limit of iDVD.

    ...For those that think they're getting the world with the iLife suite, think again.

    Thing is, did anybody think that? Did someone seriously think they were getting professional-level video editing software, in iMovie, with the free suite? Does anyone mistake iPhoto for Photoshop?

    Personally I thought I was getting some really handy organizational software for all those digital snaps, a nice little database interface for lots of songs, and movie authoring stuff that'd be great for anything on the level of a home movie. That's what the "digital hub" claims to be, right? Judging by my nine(now ten)-year-old kids' success in using the suite of programs, it's a resounding success. For home users the limits are well-chosen, to judge by us.

    For example, the 60-minute limit on highest-quality iDVD burns is a lot of video. We're talking home movies, here. We can fit half a summer's worth of video onto one disk, easily, in anything like an edited form.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  43. ffmpegX and FCExpress by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 1
    Check out ffmpegX. It's a native OS X front end to some great Unix MPEG tools. It's got a number of pre-sets for export to VCD, SVCD, and DVD, and you can tweak to your heart's content. It'll read, directly, the .mov file produced by iMovie (I used to think I had to export to a self-contained .mov file, but the way iMovie / QuickTime allows for resource linking, you point it at the [small] native iMovie file and the tools do the work for you).

    w/r/t needing to spend an extra grand - you're referring to Final Cut Pro, I presume; also check out Final Cut Express (~$250 or free [beer] if you can dig up a Premiere install disc somewhere). FCExpress works with widescreen aspect ratios.

  44. Re:Um say what? by elmegil · · Score: 1

    Y'all are fools. Hardly any OS comes with a manual any more. Try showing me the manual that comes with Windows XP. All the i* apps on Mac are shipped with the OS (or downloadable). They have some online help, but a book explaining the details calling itself "the missing manual" is just playing with words and pointing out that some people prefer written paper manuals to online help.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  45. More powerful video editing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several threads here have mentioned the limitations of iMovie.

    Linux users may want to check out the free package Cinelerra, it's a very capable piece of editing / compositing software. It's probably something that would be valuable on OSX, if it hasn't been ported there already.

  46. Amazon has 29 pages on-line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just checked Amazon, and they have 29 sample pages. It's mostly the TOC and the Index.

  47. Re:Um say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoo... Fucking 0WNED the manham-canner.

  48. Apple section of /.? by lullabud · · Score: 1

    How is it that so many stories about apple related things, such as this one, do not make it into the Apple section of /.?

  49. So many books like this by kingLatency · · Score: 1

    I go to the local bookstore and see tons of books like this in the computer section. "How to operate the easiest software you've ever laid hands on," etc. Not only are these (especially Apple iApps) pieces of software extremely easy to use immediately, they actually do have online help. Waste of paper and shelf space, if you ask me.

    --
    "I've got to stop masturbating! It makes me too lazy! Stop it, Albert. Stop it." -- Albert Einstein
  50. Don't be a dildo, of course it does. by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Saying things don't need a manual is assuming everyone's brain works the same. Preposterous! Every brain/mind/whatever test out there shows clearly there are numerous different styles of learning. Therefore some people will always need a manual.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  51. Bonus stuff is up now by pogueman · · Score: 1
    Thanks, Timothy, for an exceptionally well-done review. I accept both the praise and the constructive critiques.

    Just wanted to point out, though, that the sample chapter, table of contents, index, etc., are now posted at missingmanuals.com. I was just a little behind getting around to it.

    --Pogue