Slashdot Mirror


Google Turns 5

Gantic writes "The BBC has an article on Google's 5th birthday. The popular search engine now handles over 200 million queries a day and the word "Google" is now a noun, adjective and verb. Lets see how long the most popular search engine in the world can last, here's to another 5 years and more Google!"

17 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. a correction by madcoder47 · · Score: 4, Informative

    the article states 200 million queries a day, not 200,000 million (200 billion) queries as the slashdot post says.

    1. Re:a correction by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kudos to them though. 200 million queries a day is still a staggering amount. This must rank Google as the most useful free service in the world, I know I'd be lost without it now.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
  2. Re:200,000 Million? by BabyDave · · Score: 2, Informative
    And If it is true, what's so hard about writing 200 Billion?

    Probably the whole UK/US billion thing (although the UK billion = 10^12 is only rarely used now, as far as I've seen)

  3. Google Fan Boys by digitaltraveller · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think google's great, but just to counter the usual fan boy posts here is a link to some people who don't think so:google-watch

  4. More Google ... by crumbz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google has added a calculator function to it's primary search page. Simply type in 4*6 or (9+13)/7 into the search box and out pops the answer. Unit conversions (i.e. "how many inches in a lightyear") are performed as well. And if that wasn't enough, simply type in "the answer to life, the universe and everything" for a calculation that takes significantly less time than seven and a half million years. A nice plug for Google's computing power being equivalent to Deep Thought of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

    1. Re:More Google ... by rokzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      this is even more useful if you use Firebird browser - it has a google bar in the top right hand corner next to url bar.

      it acts as a shortcut to the 1st link of a search ("feeling lucky").

    2. Re:More Google ... by WCityMike · · Score: 2, Informative

      One thing that shouldn't be ignored is that it also does conversions. For instance, the other day, I wanted to know what 19,000 liters were in gallons. I typed "19000 liters in gallons," and it promptly converted it for me.

  5. Then Don't Forget by Kozz · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  6. Re:Do you use another? by Kneo24 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any search engine I feel like using at the moment, and this is why.

    The only time I ever use google is if I absolutely can not find what I want on other search engines.

  7. Re:200,000 Million? by sakarada · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok the reason that the word billion is not used is becuase the word is incorrectly used in america to represent 1000 million. A billion is actually 1,000,000 million. And is used as such in many countries. On an internationally read website it makes sence not to use this term. A "billion" is a relatively new word. It comes from the Italian and is first found as bimillion, bilioni, and byllion. It originally meant a million million, and in England and Germany it still does. That is the meaning of the prefix bi: two "million" written side by side and meaning a million million.

  8. Re:Do you use another? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    (C)2003 Google - Searching 3,307,998,701 web pages

    Alltheweb:
    Currently searching 3,151,743,117 web pages

    That said, who cares about index size if the search engine doesn't return pages that you actually want?

  9. Re:Hello, editors??! by puppet10 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a hack of the URL.

    Original posts URL:

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF-8&q=msn&num=-1&btnG=Google+Search

    A URL returned from a query from the google homepage:

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF -8&q=msn&btnG=Google+Search

    note the num=-1 in the original post URL.

    One thing I'm not sure of is why new searches in the search box from the original URL return a num=0 instead of whatever number you have set as the number of results you wish to see on google, but it seems like a small bug because of the original badly formed url given to it.

    --
    -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  10. Re:Hello, editors??! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Funny, it works for me. Maybe if you didn't have "&num=-1" in the URL string, it would work for you too.

  11. another correction by RobotWisdom · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 'prenatal' Google was already being discussed on netnews in March 1998. [more history]

  12. Re:Do you use another? by nitemorph · · Score: 2, Informative

    Altavista Image Search because its results are sometimes better (and more) than those of the correspondent Google thing.

    --
    I'm blue...
  13. Google toolbar by myov · · Score: 4, Informative

    Their new toolbar is great (when I'm stuck on IE). Forms autofill, popup blocking, and even the ability to vote a site up or down. Hmm... site to vote down... of course, sco.com!

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  14. Re:Do you use another? by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative
    why? because they still have kazaa lite, anti-scientology and DeCSS links.

    So does Google. The second result for scientology is xenu.net. The first result for KaZaA Lite is kazaalitekpp.com. And the first eight results for a decss search are all pages offering the DeCSS code.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.