Slashdot Mirror


Gnome 2.4 Release (d)

chendo writes "Gnome 2.4 will be released today. Here is the link to the article on Ars Technica. GNOME 2.4 is the result of quite a bit of work toward complying with the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines (HIG), which mainly focus on user interface consistency and predictability. This release has also undergone some general polish, and it can finally be said that the GNOME 2 platform has achieved maturity with this release. The Epiphany web browser, a major new component of GNOME, also makes its debut with this release. (From Footnotes)"

12 of 566 comments (clear)

  1. To keep this topic readable... by geschild · · Score: 5, Funny

    All KDE and Gnome Zealots please board this thread, forsaking all other threads within this topic.

    To make this new guideline more comfortable for the really and truly devoted:

    - KDE had all of the new features three releases ago. Please get Gnome development out of the way of The One Real GUI(tm)

    - KDE whiners: eat our dust! (Gnome, The True Gui for Real People)

    A Console/Lynx user... (Yeah, right... ;)

    --
    Karma? What's that again?
    1. Re:To keep this topic readable... by iapetus · · Score: 3, Funny

      While we're on the topic of religious software wars, you might want to try Links instead of Lynx.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    2. Re:To keep this topic readable... by geschild · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank you for the tip, but I'd rather just telnet in and parse the HTML myself, thank you.

      (That damn w3c is making life ever harder for us hard-core wankers though. Every new revision of the standards I have to 'update' my parser through a long and painfull flashing process called learning.)

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    3. Re:To keep this topic readable... by johnnyb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Loser. I speak Ethernet directly.

    4. Re:To keep this topic readable... by suwain_2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And you think that's an accomplishment? I just put the Ethernet cable to my tongue, and can feel the charges.

      (Took me a while to figure out how to see the images, though. Give it a while and you'll eventually pick up the skill.)

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  2. KDE had all of the new features three releases ago by murple · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you really want to lure all the trolls into the on true thread, you should use a subject like this. ;-)

    Murple

  3. Re:That's great! Accessibility? by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gnopernicus, the second accessibility application

    How can you provide accessibility functionality thru an unpronouncable application ?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  4. Re:Slashdot's GNOME Logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That sounds an awful lot like work... I think you should try and formulate your request a bit differently to get it accepted by the slashdot editors. Say, make a funny animation of the new logo and the old logo battling it out on the slashdot homepage (the new one should obviously win), and then submit that.

  5. Re:KDE had all of the new features three releases by geschild · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thanks for the tip. You're a bit late though, lieutenant. My original post is already modded -1 Troll. *grin*

    --
    Karma? What's that again?
  6. from the seldon-plan dept. by Matias+D'Ambrosio · · Score: 2, Funny

    That does make it a lot clearer why we are talking of the 2.4 release before gnome.org
    While I'm at it... I welcome our new Second Foundation overlords!

    --
    The geek shall inherit the Earth.
  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. Re:GNOME section icon by pmz · · Score: 2, Funny

    The GNOME section icon is out of date: GNOME changed their logo about a year ago.

    Still the foot motif. If the goal of a "lickable" interface is ever to be attained, does this mean also having to lick the foot of a gnome who probably stepped in bear poop while out hunting?