Slashdot Mirror


Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals...

Solo-Malee writes "The BBC has an article about a new phone technology that isolates the user from all other sensory input. This in theory means the user is not distracted by other things occurring in their immediate surroundings. If these catch on, it looks like getting a Jacuzzi for the office could be easier than you might expect."

49 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. The phone is your leash by grub · · Score: 4, Interesting


    [PET_PEEVE-2978741]

    This in theory means the user is not distracted by other things occurring in their immediate surroundings.

    For me the phone is a major distraction. When I'm busy I don't want a damn phone call from anyone. Unfortunately some people live by the phone; watch when a phone rings and see how people jump to answer it. Screw that: the phone is a convenient tool for me not a backdoor by which others can invade my space and privacy.

    When I had a land-line at the house I didn't own an answering machine. Caller ID let me know who called and I could decide if a return call was warranted because once a message is left the onus is on you to call back. I have just my cell now and don't give out the number to non-friends & family. Take control of your life, the phone isn't your master.

    [/PET_PEEVE-2978741]

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:The phone is your leash by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Caller ID let me know who called and I could ecide if a return call was warranted because once a message is left the onus is on you to call back.

      I can't stand you people... at least once a month, I get a call from someone that says, "Hi, I have your number in my caller id."
      And I reply, "Ok, who are you?"
      "I am such and such, you called my house."
      "6 people live in my household. I don't know who called you. Were you expecting a call from us?"

      And then they get all annoyed because they realize that they have no idea why they called. Meanwhile, you interrupted my chicken salad sandwich.

    2. Re:The phone is your leash by kzinti · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meanwhile, you interrupted my chicken salad sandwich.

      I eat ham & cheese and this never happens to me. Maybe you should try switching sandwiches.

    3. Re:The phone is your leash by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well said. My cellphone is a one-way street. It's for ME to call you, and not vice-versa. I usually leave it in my car. If you (and i mean the global 'you') have something to tell me, leave a message and if it's worth my time, I'll get back to you. I don't do the "hey what's up? Nuthin'" thing.

      Likewise, no phone conversation is worth getting into a pool and isolation helmet for. Blowjob, maybe. Phone call... no fucking way.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    4. Re:The phone is your leash by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have enough time to read/post on slashdot, I am forced to assume that you might be able to sqeeze in a 'hello' when a friend calls. Seriously, you aren't that important.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:The phone is your leash by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're missing the point. If you're eating your chicken salad sandwich, don't answer the phone. Let caller ID pick it up, finish your sandwich, and then if you're remotely concerned that you might have missed a call that you cared about, you can check caller ID. If it's some asshat calling just because he has your number on hist caller ID, and it's not a number that you recognize, forget about it and move on with your life. One of the 5 other people in the house will see that number eventually and if the call is important to them they'll call that guy back themselves.

    6. Re:The phone is your leash by William+Baric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately some people live by the phone

      The problem with most people is they feel they are not needed. They feel they have no value and no power over other people. So each time the phone ring, they hope it's someone who will say "I'd like to see you" or "I need your help" (as long as the person calling has value and power, of course). And they don't want that person to call someone else because they didn't answer the phone! Oh, no!

    7. Re:The phone is your leash by thunderbird46 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got one of those once. It was a wrong number. The woman on the other end started out, rather rudely, "What were you calling me for? I have your number in my Caller ID." I say "umm... I don't think anyone here tried to call you." She was quite adamant about us calling her, so I asked her what phone number she'd intended to dial. Turned out she misdialed! :)

    8. Re:The phone is your leash by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think we have to worry. Someone who uses the phrase "mutext lock on you" in normal conversation probably doesn't get all that many "personal" calls.

    9. Re:The phone is your leash by W32.Klez.A · · Score: 5, Funny

      10 PRINT "Hi, your number was on my caller ID."
      20 PRINT "Yeah, I was calling because your number was on my caller ID."
      30 PRINT "Oh."
      40 PRINT "Yeah."
      50 PRINT "So..."
      60 PRINT "Yeah."
      70 GOTO 50

    10. Re:The phone is your leash by PD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a cordless telephone with a bad battery that would dial random numbers when the juice got too low. Sometimes the people would call back. Luckily it never dialed a phone sex operator in Barbados...

    11. Re:The phone is your leash by ahoehn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, that's great, because you're better than all of us, and we should wait around so we can answer our phones whenever you're damn well ready to return our calls, and consider ourselves lucky to have the priviledge of talking to you.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    12. Re:The phone is your leash by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you dont want your chicken salad sandwich interrupted, all you have to do is use a Isochickensalad, a device that isolates the user from all sensory input other than chicken salad sandwich.

      The helmet delivers pre-gnawed chicken salad sandwich directly to the mouth, to avoid the distraction of having to carry the sandwich to the mouth and chewing it.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    13. Re:The phone is your leash by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok. So the jargon means the same thing as the simpler statement. Show me two people in your large organization that, while avoiding communication, think 'mutex lock' and not 'I'm busy, asshole'. Two. I'll grant that it is probably a very good idea for somebody at that organization to be doing this thinking, my point is that it isn't the busy people who are avoiding the phone, at least at the moment that they decide not to answer the phone.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  2. Driving... by cjustus · · Score: 5, Funny

    You don't want to be driving while using this phone...

    1. Re:Driving... by mechugena · · Score: 3, Funny

      What if you're in the carpool lane...then can you use it?

  3. Damn it by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 2, Funny
    "...that isolates the user from all other sensory input"

    Sounds like sex isn't going to be as much fun as before.

    1. Re:Damn it by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      Sounds like sex isn't going to be as much fun as before.

      Your hands are still free while floating in the pool. You are referring to phone-sex0r, right?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  4. Sonds like great technology for car phones! by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why should the driver be bothered by my horn, or the wrecked bus of burning nuns?

  5. Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals... by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals...

    MY JOB.

  6. I'm sorry, who is this for? by Future+Man+3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    CEOs of companies that could afford this don't need it; they've already got other mechanisms to avoid distractions on the phone.

    Unless they're filling the office pool with water, this sounds like something that missed its (.com) era.

    --

    I never vote for anyone. I always vote against.
    -- W.C. Fields

  7. Sorry About That, Chief! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks a lot like the "Cone of Silence" from Get Smart. Bet it works just as well. :)

  8. Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by FileNotFound · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The subject says it all...

    I'm sorry..but this is so retarded I don't know where to begin.

    Why? Ugh..god...

    I want what they're smoking...

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    1. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by h00pla · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Absolutely. I read an article a while back but I don't remember exactly where I saw it - I think it was in The Guardian - but it said we're now entering a period where inventors are producing stuff that has dubious value for society. It talks about how companies are now putting a great deal of effort into providing features for things - I think they mentioned cell phones - and they know that people don't use these features. The article points out that instead of making the phone better in other ways - they take surveys to find out why people aren't using the features. Here we have another example of this kind of misplaced creativity. The inventor actually says this:

      Whilst it's not necessarily very efficient, in many ways it's very pragmatic ...

      That's a pretty telling statement.

      --
      I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
  9. No smell? by turg · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the story.

    "You can't hear anything else, you can't see anything else, you can't smell anything else, all you have coming in is the telephone call.

    That is, you can't smell anything else if the swimming pool isn't chlorinated.

    Hmmm. No, I guess that wouldn't actually help much either

    --
    <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
  10. Bad idea by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Funny

    This sounds like a bad idea ... It's annoying enough talking listening to people on the phone when I can distract myself by doing other things. Imagine if I cound't read Slashdot while users where telling me their life stories? How tedious would that be?! ;-)

  11. Made me smile by ewanb · · Score: 3, Funny

    The idea that people would actively get into
    a swimming pool and put on a helmet to answer
    a work phone call. The mental image... is
    quite worrying in some cases.

    Though I find the best thing about working from
    home is that people dont have my phone number
    here, so ... noone calls me. And I go to no
    meetings. Magical.

  12. Sense free, but not other-thoughts free by Richardsonke1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, it would take a while for me to not be distracted using this "phone." How many of you are not in some way excited every time you get a new tech toy. I would be thinking more about the device, how it works, and the fact that I am in water, more than about the conversation. Your general conversations: "Dude! I'm floating in water while I talk! Isn't that cool?!"

    --
    "Men lie."
    "Yeah, about sleeping with other women, but never about bioluminescent plankton."
    -Dan Brown
  13. I can see it now by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 4, Funny
    Just as you're in the middle of your early morning swim, when some prat walks in wearing a helmet and calls out

    HELLO? I'M IN THE POOL!

    On the plus side, it'll be easier to drown them...

  14. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not funny, and no I don't think we're dangerous. I absolutely need to use my phone while driving, and pulling over to the side of the road while using the phone every time I had a call would make me even more dangerous than using the phone while moving along. Besides, I'm only on the phone for less than 5 minutes. Personally I think you have to be a bit brain damaged to not be able to do more than talk when you're driving.

  15. I wish the rest of the inusry woult take a clue by Duckman5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It ignores novelties such as polyphonic ringtones and games and instead it is designed to help you concentrate on a phone call itself.

    I'm sick of seeing all sorts of pointless features added to phones. The manufacturers know no bounds. This device isn't particularly useful, being as you need a swimming pool, but if it were made smaller, this could be something really useful when making important phone calls (when not driving, of course). I wish all the cell phone manufacturers would focus on making useful advancements such as this and better call clarity.

  16. Doesn't solve the problem! by klaxor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Whilst it's not necessarily very efficient, in many ways it's very pragmatic, in that the user will be totally focused on who they're talking to.

    Um, excuse me, but that's the problem with existing phones - the person concentrates only on the conversation, to the exclusion of everything else, including driving. If anything, we need a phone that would allow a person to do something else other than just talking. (And yes, I know about wireless headsets and I think they're great...)

  17. Sensory Deprivation... by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article doesn't really say how you would dial when you're immersed in complete sensory deprivation. I mean, your sense of sight, sound, and smell are supposedly completely removed by the device, and your body is supposed to be in body temperature water, getting rid of gravity and most of your touch. Wouldn't that make dialing a number difficult?

    I suppose maybe you could only receive calls on the thing. But then, wouldn't it be impossible for two people to use them? If the point is to focus everything onto the conversation itself, if only one person has the experience, I imagine the person in the deprivation would be pretty pissed that the other person wasn't pay as much attention as they were.

    Then again, this is a luxury item, and might only be available to executives for business calls. Perhaps they have their secretaries do all the dialing and then its just forwarded to the device, so they don't even have to worry about that aspect of it.

    Ultimately, I think its impractical, though I'm glad that some people are doing truly innovative work. I give it a B for effort.

  18. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For every person that can handle it there are ten that can't. Hell I've seen people that can't have a conversation with the person sitting next to them without losing focus on the road. No matter you think cell phones are very dangerous in most people hands while driving. I've seen people run stop signs, drive 30 miles per hour on the highway, swerve wildly, cut across three lanes to make a turn they missed. My sister was actually in an accident because of a cell phone.

    No one is saying to pull over but for God's sake at least buy a $10 headset or speaker phone attachment for it.

  19. All the meanwhile by antis0c · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your house is burning down, your kid cut his hand off, your husband is having a heart attack but your zoned out on your phone call to to vote for the next American Idol.

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
  20. YAY! by phloydphreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    hm, I dont have the attention span or caring to devote time to a phone call, locking my door and spending quality time with loved ones. I guess I will buy a sensory deprivation phone so that my ADD (read American upbringing) wont interfere with the quality time I am not willing to put effort into.

    After all, a phone is not enough to converse, but with a helmet, all things things are possible. I mean... its a helmet.

    --
    "this is the gloaming"
    radiohead
  21. a bit of my sensory deprivation experience by zptdooda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds great - except for the phone.

    When I tried a sensory deprivation tank (no phone, just epsom salts thanks), it was a big egg-shaped tank without any lights. Afterwards my date and I got totally engrossed in cutlery at the restaurant. We were swimming in over-perception. The effect waned over a few days.

    Guess with this one you could get your computer to phone you and play "Echoes" by Pink Floyd, or just shut the phone off.

    Anyone know any good sensory deprivation music? Polly would need a hi-fi phone though...

    BTW I'm experimenting with browsing at -4 funny, o/w my comment would have been something like "Looks like the woman's phone has 5 spheres not 3. Oh wait ..." (someone's probably said this by now, let me check ...)

    --
    Esteem isn't a zero sum game
  22. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think we're dangerous

    Oh sure, no one ever does. "I can drive faster than the speed limit because I'm a better driver and that means I'm not dangerous!" or "I can steer with my knees because I'm in control and I'm not dangerous!"

    I absolutely need to use my phone while driving

    Oh really? Tell us Mr. President, how do you find time to relax with your oh so busy schedule? It must be hell, poor you!

    Besides, I'm only on the phone for less than 5 minutes.

    Oh, five minutes, is that all? Lets see, five minutes at 50Mph...that 4 Miles you covered without paying proper attention to what you're doing. Thats O.K though, because you're not dangerous, right?

  23. Don't walk on the sidewalks! by Bendebecker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet some fool will get it for his car...
    "Yeah, officer, I was driving down the highway at 65mph when my phone rang. I have no idea how I ended up in this field! And why is the front of my car all covered in blood?"

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  24. Abusable by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Funny


    Imagine running and jumping into the pool, strapping on your Lunar Lander floating headset, and getting all situated, just to find a telemarketer on the other end of the line!

    I don't know what's worse, that you have to get out and dry off, or that the telemarketer has your TOTAL ATTENTION.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  25. To sum up the article in one sentance. by Badgerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People with too much time on their hands invent incredibly impractical device for easily distracted people who probably will never use it anyway.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
  26. my new phone routine? by 514x0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    so now i have to run upstairs, strip down to a swimsuit, jump in the pool and get the headgear on all in the 4 rings before it goes to voicemail?

    --

    !(^((ri)|(mp))aa$)
  27. What a waste by dkone · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah I am sure these will catch on. Not only that it should be a big boost to the pool industry. Don't worry about the fact that in many areas you will only be able to use your phone during the summer months. Hmmm, I can just see it now... "well, I am not going to call my mother/sister/brother during the winter, because I know she/she/he will not be paying attention to me.

    Just some random thoughts:

    Everytime I get in the pool I always have to pee, which would be a distraction in itself.

    Other people would probably be swiming in the pool, there is nothing more irritating to me then someone splashing me while I am in the pool.

    Do you have to sit in the pool all day waiting for a call, or do you answer a call and ask the person to hold while you put your bathing suit on.

    What if there is an electrical storm while you are on the phone? You would not know and could die.

    Do you think the ring tone should be the theme to Jaws?

  28. I find it funny by fullmetal55 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lots of people think the phone is a convenience item for them, not to allow other people to reach you. well what about the phone number you're dialing? do they feel the same way as you? then aren't you just as bad as that big bad person calling you? In my previous job I hated people like that, who would never pick up the phone until I called 10 times, instead choosing to verbally abuse me after they finally pick up,without knowing why i was calling, or who I was. Dispite the fact that I was calling back to solve a problem they were having with their computer, calling back to solve it any way possible. the caller ID didn't say who i was, Just which line I was calling out of, it didn't even have my proper line. Answering machines are better, then I can leave a message. but the people who only use caller ID are very arrogant. what if the number was that of a hospital which didn't come up as "hospital" but just as a number you didn't know. Would you ignore it? dispite the fact that they are attempting to contact you about, for example, your child, your parent, your sibling, your spouse. The phone is a two way street. like it or lump it, it is a two way street.

    1. Re:I find it funny by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 3, Funny

      My solution is to have two cell phones. I use one to call the other. That way I'm not the "big bad person calling." I know when I call myself i don't mind being called at that particular moment. Likewise, when my phone rings, it's conveniently always at a time I'm ready to answer. Then when I'm walking down the street or on the train or in an elevator I can conspicuiously talk about what important shit I'm working on or how cool I am.

      The added bonus is I have a cell phone in each hand over each ear. I'm a total badass and this lets people know it! BTW, I tried this with those handsfree one-ear headsets. Unfortunately people just thought I was listening to an iPod and talking to myself. "I'm a badass, I'm not crazy," I would have to tell them. It got to be a pain.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
  29. I can't find a job but... by endus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...someone still has the money to develop this. This is without a doubt the dumbest thing I have ever seen in my entire life. Whoever wasted money on developing this is an idiot...although smoehow I have the feeling that someone else will be dumb enough to buy it. Completely pointless...black goggles and a headset will do the same thing. Why do you need to be isolated from physical input while on the phone....sosososososososososososo stupid.

  30. hey stop picking on me! by anonymous+loser · · Score: 2, Funny
    or the wrecked bus of burning nuns

    You turn ONE LITTLE bus full of nuns into burning wreckage and that's all everyone talks about. "Hey AL! How many hail Marys did ya get?"

  31. prior art by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a new phone technology that isolates the user from all other sensory input

    You mean like... a PHONE BOOTH?

  32. Re:No sensation and no... by KurdtX · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I don't think we're dangerous
    Oh sure, no one ever does
    The problem is that some people can drive while talking on the phone and some can't (some can't even drive, period). The ones who can drive while talking on a cell phone you never notice (as it should be). As I live in California, where everyone has a cell phone, and frequently use them in cars, I've actually spent time (when riding as a passenger) noting who are talking on their cell phones and who aren't. About half of the solo drivers are typically on their phones, and yet I only see one or two people per trip who get themselves in trouble because of the phone.

    Granted, anyone can talk on the phone while driving in a straight line at a constant speed (I've actually known guys who've fallen asleep on long straight roads and done fine), but it's the emergency situations that the people on phones can't deal with. And the problem is 1) they forget the basic rule of driving of looking as far ahead as you can see and 2) they won't stop their conversation to deal with the situation. Since talking on a cell phone should be equivalent to talking to a passenger, they need to realize that when talking to a passenger, you both stop talking when someone cuts you off.

    Personally, I've told people to hold on, put the phone down, done what I had to do, and then resumed the conversation (with explination). I also drive 10-15 mph slower (I like to drive 80-90 mph) when on the phone, as I realize that they are a distraction and my reaction speed will be slowed (I do the same when I have passengers in the car, too). I'd also like to mention that I don't use cell phones on local roads, as there are too many things that could happen that can't in the controlled environment of a freeway. A little bit of thought (often lacking) and cell phones aren't as much of a problem as you think they are.

    Given that you said you drive 50mph I take it you're not in California, and probably not anywhere with much traffic, or hour+ long commutes that really have turned the cell phone into a necessity (I don't even have a land line, 'cause I'm never home except to sleep). Maybe instead of assuming everyone is like you (I salute you if you recognize that you don't have the ability to talk on the phone and drive at the same time), realize how diverse people are in their abilities. Hey, someone was doing alright at running a country, but thought that fooling around with an intern in the White House would stay a secret.
    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.