Slashdot Mirror


No Grand Theft Auto In Prison?

Thanks to Frictionless Insight for pointing to an Australian article discussing a judge's suggestion that Grand Theft Auto-style games not be available in prison. According to the report, "Bradley Scott McConkey... led police on a 200km car chase at speeds of up to 180 kilometres per hour, as well as stealing cars at knifepoint and committing armed robbery on two businesses", and additionally, "...a psychologist's report said McConkey had played Playstation's Grand Theft Auto during a previous jail term." Due to the similarity of the games and the crime, the judge suggested "...the appropriateness of Grand Theft Auto-style games in a prison environment was questionable", since it "provides opportunities for rehearsing their destructive activities."

80 comments

  1. Video Games in Prison? by saden1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh my, my tax dollars are paying for that now? I want a Console for x-mass, send me one Uncle Sam!

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    1. Re:Video Games in Prison? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you know, you don't lose the privilidge of having possessions when you become a prisoner. you can very well save for an xbox or tv, or have some relatives that might want to give one to you(you know, prisoners shouldn't lose their human rights).

      and personally i feel playing games is alot better than shooting up crack while in prison(if you think that's not possible, guess again.).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Video Games in Prison? by Babbster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      you know, prisoners shouldn't lose their human rights

      Actually, going to prison means at its base that you DO lose human rights, though not quite all of them. Furthermore, depending on what kind of prison you're in, there are many things that you cannot own and possess inside the place - were owning and possessing property in one's cell a right in prison, I expect there would be a lot of Ginsu products sold there. I suppose it's possible that there are prisons where you can own and possess your television in prison, but it's certainly not a standard and would in most states be subject to the warden/superintendant's decision.

    3. Re:Video Games in Prison? by Feztaa · · Score: 0

      you don't lose the privilidge of having possessions when you become a prisoner.

      Lol, next you'll tell us that prisoners have the right to bear arms :)

    4. Re:Video Games in Prison? by JAYOYAYOYAYO · · Score: 1

      HUH? Does your uncle Sam live in Australia? RTFA

    5. Re:Video Games in Prison? by IM6100 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Shooting up crack?

      Crack? The form of cocaine modified to make it a real 'rush' to smoke in a pipe?

      You lead a sheltered life if you think anybody is shooting it up.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    6. Re:Video Games in Prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness it is still possible to say that there are people who live such a "sheltered" life.

      What, you'd rather everyone be as intimately familiar with crack as yourself? Is the proper use of crack part of your daily life, to the point that it gnaws at your soul for you to see people speak naively about it?

      Tell us more.

    7. Re:Video Games in Prison? by gl4ss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      well i don't associate myself with people who use other stuff than alcohol/weed for getting on.

      good old whiskey is good enough for me.

      and of course the local lingo is different for drugs, but replace crack with heroin then..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Video Games in Prison? by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      The point was, any idiot anywhere should be aware that crack is the smokable form of cocaine. Reading one or two news articles about the 'crack epidemic' would be enough to know that.

      Ask me why the hell I am replying to an A.C., though?

      *shrug*

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    9. Re:Video Games in Prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ask me why the hell I am replying to an A.C., though?"

      No.

      -AC

    10. Re:Video Games in Prison? by colonelteddy · · Score: 1

      Well, I live in Australia, and my uncle Sam lives here too. he won't buy me a console though. Cheap bastard.

      --
      c - a blessed +5 grain of salt
  2. Uh, video games in prison? by adamjaskie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is my money paying for this? They shouldnt have tetris, let alone GTA. Hell, I dont have a playstation 2, why should a bank robber in jail?

    --
    /usr/games/fortune
    1. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you Australian?

    2. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by higuy48 · · Score: 1

      If you let prisoners play Tetris all day long, who WOULDN'T want to go to prison?

      --
      And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
    3. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by Babbster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The likelihood is that prisons with video games have one or two consoles in a rec room serving hundreds of prisoners. Considering how many prisoners can be entertained at a time (watching and playing), a video game console would actually be a relatively economical diversion. Also, unless you're one of those who truly believe that video games make people do things they wouldn't ordinarily do (like stealing cars and beating people), they could also be a good way to bleed off a bit of the aggression that many prisoners will inevitably feel.

      Finally, I would note that, at least for me, I'm far more concerned about how much money we spend putting non-violent offenders in prison for using drugs. They could afford nice setups with 10 or more computers/consoles in every prison if we could trim those numbers down. A Playstation 2 or three is hardly a drop in the prison bucket.

    4. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      this is in australia...but why the hell would ANY prison provide a game console for prisoners? for gods sake, its prison; you arent supposed to relax and have fun. its for punishment. if they get to not work, excersize, watch tv and play ps2 wheres the punishment? random prison rape?

      youd think to punish someone in hopes they wouldnt commit further crimes that a prisoner wouldnt have acces to much more than: some excersize equipment, limited outdoor time, news, some education, prison-class food, a small cell. if the only punishment you get is random rape, why bother locking them up?

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    5. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      for gods sake, its prison; you arent supposed to relax and have fun. its for punishment.

      Generally, the primary purpose of prison is not punishment, it is to rehabilitate the prisoners so they can rejoin society. Many people complain that prisoners get free education, but maybe if they gain some useful skills they won't be commiting crimes when they are released. Being in shape will be useful for many jobs. Relaxation will help keep them sane, and prevent rage from building up, which is always useful.

      So a more useful question would be whether video games are useful for rehabilitation. Maybe some games are, but probably not GTA.

    6. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by spencerogden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not one of theose people who think that video games make "do things". But I do think that providing entertainment to inmates is dumb. If you want entertainment, at least make it valuable, read a book or something. Like the origional poster said, I don't even own a playstation. I fail to see what benefit the availability of video games has towards rehabilitation.

    7. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by psyco484 · · Score: 1
      Uh, who said the prison provided the system or the game? Prisoners can own things, though I am of the belief that prison should be a punishment, not a recreational break away from the rest of society. I'm not saying prisoners should be beaten and stuff, but if you let their punishment be sitting around watching tv and playing games while talking to others around them...shit, I know a lot of people who would sign up for that.

      Honestly this makes sense to me and should've been done a while ago, except the limit should be to all games, not just games where violence or crime is a good thing. I can see recreation via chess or reading or something like that...but come on, it's a prison, not a college dorm. Bar them from video games, television, etc. and make their removal from society a little less entertaining at least.

    8. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by Krunch · · Score: 1

      > I fail to see what benefit the availability of video games has towards rehabilitation.
      What about The Sims ? :op

      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    9. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pssh. When you can't house the prisoners, ease up on the number of convicted, right?

      I say we should be killing more prisoners. Offing some murderers and child molesters would make a lot more room for dope fiends. When raping and killing a child gets you free room and board for the rest of your life, something's wrong.

    10. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      The benefit that the availability of video games and entertainment has is that it makes prisoners happier, and a happy prisoner is less likely to make costly and fatal trouble.

      I mean, let's face it - locking up lots of known criminals in one place together is already a risky idea. Making them bored and unhappy is just asking for trouble.

      And, considering the illiteracy rate in prison, books just aren't gonna cut it.

    11. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by feidaykin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this would be a small consolation to the people that are wrongfully imprisoned. But that doesn't happen here in the US, does it?

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    12. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I fail to see what benefit the availability of video games has towards rehabilitation.

      Rehabilitation is not a goal of the US prison system. Making money and keeping inmates away from the population are the goals. Rehabilitation is only a goal of juvenile facilities usually. Once you're in the adult system, they aren't even trying to rehabilitate you. That would be too expensive.

    13. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by La+Temperanza · · Score: 3, Funny

      This just in: A gruesome murder was committed in which a family of four was trapped inside their house for two weeks by an insane killer before starving to death.

      The flamboyant perpetrator, billing himself "The Playa", somehow removed all the windows and doors, replaced the flooring with concrete, and destroyed all furniture including the toilet and refrigirator while the family was inside. "There was a noise, it sounded kinda like 'Paused, and everything changed," describes the half-eaten diary of Mya Sim, twelve years old.

      Just as mysteriously, none of the neighbors noticed the family's plight until it was far too late, despite the house's drastically altered appearance. The police were finally tipped off by someone with the alias of "Game Over", thought to be a rival underground figure.

      --

      --
      est modus in rebus
    14. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Oh, right, so just because a few of the people in the prison are wrongfully imprisoned, we should spend our tax money to buy prisoners playstations? Im NOT in prison. Wheres MY playstation? Prisoners should be provided with food, shelter, clothing, exercise, and education. They dont need video games. If you are wrongfully imprisoned, thats your problem. We dont need to change how we treat prisoners, just because some of them might not be guilty.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    15. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by feidaykin · · Score: 1
      Oh, right, so just because a few of the people in the prison are wrongfully imprisoned, we should spend our tax money to buy prisoners playstations?

      We sure as hell should.

      It would be amusing to watch your opinion change if you are wrongfully imprisoned.

      I think it is a small price to pay. Granted, if people have a history of car-jacking, GTA might not be the best choice. Between rape and other abuse, I think prisoners have enough shit to worry about that the PS2 hardly makes up for any of it. And if you're bitching about paying for that PS2, then maybe you should bitch about the construction of roads you don't need, too. I'm sure that costs a fair amount more. Or how about a state that spent something like $15,000 on a study to figure out why prisoners wanted to... escape... from prison? That was money well spent, I am sure.

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    16. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe they should spend the money on roads rather than spending it on entertaining criminals. $15k on a study to figure out why prisoners wanted to escape? Thats insane. Of course they want to escape. Having playstations for them wont change them wanting to escape. Just because there MIGHT be a few people wrongfully imprisoned doesnt mean ALL prisoners are wrongfully imprisoned. Besides, if I was wrongfully imprisoned, I would be spending all my time talking to lawyers, not playing on a playstation. Having a playstation wouldnt change the fact that I was wrongfully imprisoned, and, frankly, I wouldnt CARE if I had one. I would be concentrating on getting an appeal.

      Criminals dont need entertainment. They need punishment. We need to spend less money on prisons, so that money can go back to law-abiding citizens. Fix the potholes on the roads. Buy new computers for the elementary schools. Hell, give a few tax refunds. Dont buy playstations for murderers and rapists. Why not spend all the money you save on playstations to better train investigators so there is not as high a chance of wrongful conviction?

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    17. Re:Uh, video games in prison? by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      Not trying to rehabilitate? Then why do they offer parole? Why do they have prisoners working? Why not just bind them in their cells?

      Ohh, that's right. You're retarded. Almost every penal system in the western world is focussed on rehabilitation over incarceration.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
  3. Playstation? In prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That white collar crime is looking better and better. Hopefully I won't get sent to federal pound-you-in-the-ass prison.

  4. Ok.... what?!?! by hawkbug · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe I'm ignorant here, but I'm not surprised by the fact that they can't play GTA in prison... I'm surprised by the fact they have video games at ALL in prison. This is news to me. Maybe I should go rob somebody so I can get free food and housing, and now PS2 games in the slammer...

    1. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by isorox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For us slashdotters with computers, homes, internet, and probably a lot more, prison still is a deterrent, but when I look at a guy I saw at the Oxford Circus Underground station a couple of weeks ago, white as a sheet, thin as a rake, looked really bad (I gave him all the change in my pocket, if I went that way frequently I'd be taking him sandwiches), and I wonder why the system fails. If you're out on the streets, genuinely starving, just throw a brick through a window and confess police station, at the very least you get a bed for the night.

    2. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      We put people in prison for one of three reasons: 1) to rehabilitate them, 2) to punish them, 3) to keep them away from polite society so they won't harm us again.

      Unless you are in prison for option 2, why the fuck shouldn't you play video games whilst there? Especailly since you might be there because the government has exceeded their mandate and locked you up for ingesting a substance that it is none of their fucking business to prevent you from ingesting.

    3. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It truly annoys me that there are still people who do not know what prison is for, yet they choose to write self-righteous replies pointing out wrong facts. I'll give you a hint: it's called a corrective facility for a reason. The fact is that through our education and social memes we have gotten to believe that prison is for punishment. It is not, and we need to be categorical about this. The fact that people still believe that you are being punished while in prison, let alone that you are in prison so you cannot do more harm is indicative of the ignorance of basic human rights that were that were the object of much fighting in 18th Century France and America.

      Even more indicative of especially the American public's specific fascination with the equation "prison=punishment" is that you actually think it is the death penalty is a conversation topic when all of the developed world has understood that when the establishment chooses to murder one of its subjects, the battle is lost. Also, as far as I know, federal prisoners automatically lose their right to vote and to be elected. In many western democracies, taking away these rights is reserved for only of the worst of criminals and, specifically, ones convicted of high treason or political crimes.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    4. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by isorox · · Score: 1

      Scum CHOOSES to be scum

      I take it you're the rule that proove the exception.

      Typically I ignore "beggars" who are probably on a better wage then me, but this guy didnt even have any veins to inject

    5. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by Chasuk · · Score: 1

      I think that we are essentially in agreement. I wasn't actually arguing that we imprison people to punish them, which was why I was arguing for the rights of prisoners to enjoy their consoles while they are locked up.

      Sorry if I was unclear.

      Anyway, as far as a prison being a "corrective facility," how many of the broken people who go into them ever emerge fixed? Results are the only true measure, not ideology or intention.

      We do hold people in prison so they cannot do cannot do more harm, but only because we have to be protected from them while they are "corrected."

      The system doesn't work. People are not cakes or pies that take a set amount of time to be prepare (to make whole). When, or if, the person has been repaired, we should let them out of the institution, not before, at least if we are adhering to the "prison is not punishment" credo.

    6. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by DarkZero · · Score: 1

      It truly annoys me that there are still people who do not know what prison is for, yet they choose to write self-righteous replies pointing out wrong facts. I'll give you a hint: it's called a corrective facility for a reason. The fact is that through our education and social memes we have gotten to believe that prison is for punishment. It is not, and we need to be categorical about this. The fact that people still believe that you are being punished while in prison, let alone that you are in prison so you cannot do more harm is indicative of the ignorance of basic human rights that were that were the object of much fighting in 18th Century France and America.

      This is all fine and good, but I don't see video game consoles actually contribute to the rehabilitation of the prisoner. Reading can be done for entertainment, but still improves the literacy of the prisoner and also possibly their general knowledge (if it's nonfiction). While it does do other things, such as being entertaining, it serves as a facet of rehabilitation. Video game consoles, on the other hand, generally don't teach ANYTHING to ANYONE. They serve neither a rehabilitation nor a punishment purpose and are instead just there to have fun. I don't see that as serving the purpose of prison in any way.

    7. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by ameoba · · Score: 1

      It all sounds good in theory, but unfortunately it's nothing like that; if you've ever talked to anyone who's spent time in one (as an inmate or as an officer), rehabilitation is about as far from what goes on as is imaginable. The popular idea is that incarceration can be justified in 3 ways : rehabilitation, punishment/retribution and separation from society. Very little effort's put into the first, the 2nd makes taxpayers feel good but, especialy considering draconian mandatory sentencing rules, the 3rd is really all the gov't concerned with.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    8. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      I was not talking about the specifics of GTA in prison, rather I chose to comment on the wrong assumption that prison time is time you spend being punished. Yes, I'd probably agree with your opinion...

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    9. Re:Ok.... what?!?! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      The system does not work because nobody expects prisons to be corrective facilities anymore. Everyone has resigned to seeing them as punishment. Would you, for example, hire someone who has been in prison? I know I wouldn't, even considering the post I made. Why? Because even though prison, the institution, is a corrective facility, nobody expects it to function as such. It ends up, therefore, being exactly what everyone thinks it is - punishment.

      My own worldview does not have a place for prisons as they are since they provide absolutely no benefit to society except for a sense of "revenge" on the part of the wronged (be it society or an individual) and a segregation of the good and the bad.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  5. Just Change It by cybermage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't take GTA away from them, just give them a version where they get gunned down in a hail of bullets within seconds of commiting a crime.

    A little conditioning goes a long way.

  6. Why is this a problem? by Blitter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're dealing with an adult who has demonstrated that they are irresponsible and a danger to society, not a minor who has avoided screwing up in real life even though he loves playing GTA. You're also dealing with a guy who is in prison: he doesn't get the bennies the good guys do. This is hardly a case of The Man being scared that video games will create monsters. The judge realized that with normal people that isn't going to happen, but with people who have demonstrated they can't manage their behavior and steal cars at knifepoint and lead police on high speed chases, it's a valid concern.

    --
    I am Jack's writable stack pointer.
  7. Holy shit. by Lukey+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The bigger issue is... I can play video games in prison? What the hell's with that?

  8. I play quake to relieve my anger and kill people. by seann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    works good for anger management.

    --
    I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  9. Six years, eight months? by Babbster · · Score: 3, Interesting
    McConkey pleaded guilty in August to seven charges including assault with intent to rob, aggravated armed robbery and stealing a car...He was sentenced to a total of six years and eight months in jail.

    Is anyone else more concerned that Australia can't give a tougher sentence to people who commit violent crimes (armed robbery)? Admittedly, I don't know much about the Australian justice system. Do they actually put people away for the entirety of their sentence? If so then the sentence isn't TOO bad (seems like it could still be longer), but in America the above sentence would end up being under three years if the prisoner met enough parole conditions...

    1. Re:Six years, eight months? by jquirke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Australian sentences generally seem to be fairly short, from what I've seen (in the state of Victoria).

      For example, it seems the public is content with a violent murderer going away for 15-20 years, whereas in the US you'd probably want life, or death.

      I was actually surprised at this guy for getting almost 7 years - although this is another state (WA) so I'm not too familiar with their sentencing - it will obviously differ state to state as it does in the US.

    2. Re:Six years, eight months? by @madeus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Australian sentencing seems to be quite leniant by US standards. It seems to me to be very similar to the UK. In the UK (and I suspect in Australia too) there is much pressure on over crowed prisions.

      Interestingly enough, this was a problem in the US when GWB came to power, so, duh, he though, we need to build a lot more prisions (a very GWB solution).

      I'm not a fan of the US Justice System (it /still/ exececutes people for a start, which is entirely despicable in my book, and I find it US police are excessively authoritarian, though I do like the idea of elected high ranking police officals) but quite frankly building more prison space was a simple, logical idea. It worked too! - Crime was brought down. He was 100% spot on in building more prisons.

      It's not because prison re-habilitates people that 'more prisons' work (most people go on to reoffend), and it's not that it's a deterrent (statistically, term lengths have very little impact because criminals don't expect to get caught). it's just that so crime is commited by the same group of poeple. If you keep them (a tiny minority) locked up, then they are not going around commiting crimes, so the crime rate falls. It's really that simple.

      Of course in the long term you need improved education and social services too, so you can socially engineer the populace so they are less included to mug/rape/murder each other, but you need to 'keep the loonies of the grass' in the mean time - you can't have them running around in the street commiting drive bys and GTA.

      IMO, this is what we need to do in the UK, more prisions and less 'lighter sentences beacause the prisons are overcrowed!'. We also badly need a 3 strikes and your out rule IMO. I am fed up with serial car jackers, burgalers and murders who get light sentences (out after 8 years for rape and murder, for example), only to re-offend. I mean, FFS, if the have been arrested for burglary/assault/car theft 10 times already what the fuck are they doing out of jail already?

      Take the case of Tony Martin, who was sentanced to jail for life for shooting dead a burglar on his own land (there were two burglars who had come to steal from him, Tony Martin was alone in a remote house in the country). Tony Martin's sentance was reduced to 5 years on appeal (though he was refused early release), but most interesting point about the whole affair was:

      The burgler who died had already been in court 28 times for crimes including theft, fraud, offences against property and public disorder. His accomplice was even worse and had 34 criminal convictions for the same types of offences!

      There is no way either of these two should have been walking around the streets, it's just incompotence on the part of our justice system. The judges responsible *should* have been named and shamed and forced to resign. They are clearly not fit to serve. In this respect, the US legal system certainly works better than ours because sentancing is harsher in cases like this.

      Oh, and get this - the wounded buglar (33 year old Brendon Fearon) is suing Tony Martin for 'loss of earnings', despite currently being in jail on an 18 month sentance for dealing heroin. The fact that he even has a chance of winning should disturb us all...

      The funny thing is, the whole business of judges handing down light sentences so as not to further over crowd prisions really pisses the police in the UK off as well, they know that if they arrest someone and hand the case over to the CPS (Criminal Prosecution Service) to handle, they are easily back on the streets and commit crimes again because the judge will invariably go lightly on them and the whole exercise will just end up being a complete waste of police and CPS time as well of course of money.

    3. Re:Six years, eight months? by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least building prisons creates jobs, unlike his tax cut.

      --

      --
      est modus in rebus
  10. The problem with Australians is... by psxndc · · Score: 2, Funny
    The problem with Australians is they are too tough. The judge was probably like "Only seven counts? Pansy. Six years!"

    This is a nation founded as a prison colony. They think Rugby isn't rough enough so they made up Australian Rugby. They are psychos down there. Have you ever tried drinking with an Australian?? They have a death wish!

    I don't question anything the Australians have done, except maybe using PAL instead of NTSC. I mean these are the people that "Hey, Paul Hogan and Yahoo Serious: Get out!" Sound like a bright and psychotic bunch those Aussies

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:The problem with Australians is... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "The problem with Australians is they are too tough."

      Then I'd like to see this guy move to, say, Texas and try to continue his carjacking spree in a place where many drivers are more heavily armed than this guy.

  11. Cant you see by floydman · · Score: 1

    it "provides opportunities for rehearsing their destructive activities."

    This is considered as credit for rockstar, for devloping such a realistic simulation. I would consider this as an ad more of it as anti-campaign..

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  12. Rehearsal for real life crimes? by Violet+Null · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sure, I guess GTA can be used as a rehearsal for real life crimes, as long as those real life crimes assume the following facts apply in the real world...
    • Police are willing to overlook any crime -- even the slaughter of dozens of policeman -- with a few bribes. Or, even easier, by having your car spray painted another color.
    • A car can undergo any trauma -- even falling from the roof of a building or cliff or ramming another car at full speed -- and still provide complete protection and allow at least seven seconds getaway before it blows up.
    • High powered weapons can be found in obscure corners.
    • You never run out of gas.
    • Car doors are hardly ever locked.
    • You can carjack any car you want simply by stepping in front of it, waiting for it to stop (which it will always do), and then removing the driver from the car, which is never resisted.
    • Cops don't care if you flagrantly violate traffic rules.
    • If, somehow, you die or get arrested, you only lose a little amount of money, and your weapons.

    Yep, assume all that, and it is a highly useful simulation.
  13. I remember these! by Sevn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bradley Scott McConkey led police on a 200km car chase at speeds of up to 180 kilometres per hour, as well as stealing cars at knifepoint and committing armed robbery on two businesses. If he spent a total of 15 minutes stealing cars at knifepoint, and commiting armed robbery while maintaining a total average speed of 155kph when he was driving, how big is his butthole now?

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
  14. Uh, yeah. by redgopher · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking the key part of this article is the fact that he played it "during a previous jail sentence."

    I mean, doesn't that give you some kind of clue to what you should let inmates play?

    "Yeah, Hi, I've been incarcerated before."
    "Oh, okay. Here's your copy of GTA3. Have a nice day."

    I can't believe my tax dollars are paying prisons to make the problem worse. I know everyone says it, but prisons should be rehabilitating them for acceptance in everyday moral society... and most certainly keeping them from GTA until they are deemed stable enough to determine right from wrong.

    --
    Insert clever one liner here.
  15. I actually think this is a terrible idea by bamurphy · · Score: 1

    If the average inmate is as bad as GTA as I am it should be a massive deterrent to crime. I suck so much its unbelievable - although I can snipe and strafe and murder with the best of them in CS or UT, I cannot hit the broadside of a barn with a shotgun in GTA3 - I dont think i've ever completed an entire mission without a cheat code in any of the games.

    Give them this game! Rockstar, make a harder version for criminals, one with alternate paths like community college and construction careers.

  16. Lets take away paper and pens too! by PerpetualMotion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And books....you can't forget the books. We wouldn't want someone reading some murder mystery while in for a dime on manslaughter. Why don't we just cage them up in bamboo cells, call them animals, and set them all loose in Australia after they complete their term. GTA is whats happening in the real world, and if you keep your inmates secluded and sheltered from real life not only do you run the risk of culture shock when they get out, you make them less efficent in society. If you want to ban someone from playing GTA even after they run out their term, well, I suppose the ACLU would have something to say.

  17. Australian article by Krunch · · Score: 1

    Wasn't Australia a British penal colony some times ago ? That would explain some things.

    --
    No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
  18. GTA in Aussieland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wasn't the original GTA completely banned in Australia? I thought they kept up the trend to present-day too. Why would the prisoner even have access to it?

    1. Re:GTA in Aussieland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      GTA3 was released locally, but pulled off the shelves after a month or so, mainly due to the fact that the game allowed you not only to have sex with a prostitute, but to attack her after the deed and steal your money back. Shooting random pedestrians is seemingly ok, but when combined with sex it becomes a no-no. The game was then re-released sans prostitution, and no other changes as far as I'm aware of (the girls are still there, but are just pedestrians now). When Vice City was released, it was prostitution-free from the beginning, to stop the ban happening again.

      There was a fuss a while back about this same topic, prisoners allowed to play GTA3 while incarcerated, but it died down with no real result, as most issues do down here.

    2. Re:GTA in Aussieland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > GTA3 was released locally, but pulled off the shelves after a month or so, mainly due to the fact that the game allowed you not only to have sex with a prostitute, but to attack her after the deed and steal your money back.

      What's the big fuss? The game allows shooting and having sex, but since you can't call for prostitute after killing one, so of course you have to copulate then kill. Heck, the sex part wasn't even remotely explicit like the Japanese rape adventure games. It clearly shows Australian governors are complete morons for misappropriating the contexts of such combined actions.

  19. Changes needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They let inmates play video games, lift weights etc etc to keep them from rioting and raping each other. The same people whining about all these perks are the same people who would raise hell if any more money went into fixing the prison system; making them secure institutions that are harsh yet humane instead of a candyland for gangs.

  20. In the words of Robin Williams..... by shadowcabbit · · Score: 2

    "Fucking duh!"
    -- (from the 2002 Live album)

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  21. The problem is not that it's a video game... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...the problem is that violent crime is a successful option in the game. It's teaching - reinforcing gently but over and over and over again - that "violent crime can get you stuff".

    When David Birnie, serial killer along with his wife Catherine, was given a computer in prison to write up his life story as a warning to others, he promptly began turning out sick porn which bore an uncanny resemblance to the perversions and murders he and his wife had actually committed. It's not the computer's fault, but the computer certainly helped to propagate Birnie's lethal sickness rather than provide a catharsis or a useful warning. Nobody will be surprised that his computer was taken away again.

    Given the proportion of inmates service time for violence and/or stealing, a game like GTA could most moderately be described as a bloody stupid choice for a prison. The console is not really a problem, although you could argue with some justification that part of the intent of imprisoning someone is to make the consequences of their crime unattractive to them and that the console is frustrating that intent. But given that the US Army is using first-person role-playing games as part of their troop training (and as a recruiting tool), it seems amazingly stupid to allow anything like GTA there. Any violent or destructive game hardly furthers any of the purposes of a prison, but the gobbledok who let GTA in needs his head read.

    BTW, posting this from Western Australia.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  22. So fix it. Like, d'uh? That *wasn't* obvious? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    And, considering the illiteracy rate in prison, books just aren't gonna cut it.

    The obvious first step, then, would be to do something about illiteracy. And I'm not talking about boring traditional lessons even though they would be better than nothing.

    Sitting them in front of television is much worse than useless (Anton LaVey, founder of Satanism, wrote "Kneeling before the cathode ray God, with our TV Guide concordance in hand, we maintain the illusion of choice by flipping channels (chapters and verses). It doesn't matter what is flashing on the screen - all that's important is that the TV stays on".

    After noticing that, to let in an RPG that actively trains inmates to be violent thieves is just mind-blowingly dumb.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:So fix it. Like, d'uh? That *wasn't* obvious? by Danse · · Score: 1

      Anton LaVey, founder of Satanism, wrote "Kneeling before the cathode ray God, with our TV Guide concordance in hand, we maintain the illusion of choice by flipping channels (chapters and verses). It doesn't matter what is flashing on the screen - all that's important is that the TV stays on".

      Ok, so this guy said that. What gives his opinion any credibility anyway? Literacy is a noble pursuit, but not one that our prisons are likely to undertake in a serious way. Much cheaper and easier to just give the inmates something to keep them happy and docile. Prisons are an industry now and have to think about their bottom line. They really have no incentive to rehabilitate anyway, quite the contrary, repeat business is good for them.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:So fix it. Like, d'uh? That *wasn't* obvious? by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, they DO address the literacy problem of criminals in a serious way. Specifically, a prisoner (at least in the US) can get credit towards his sentence by completing high school and college courses.

  23. Or option 1...? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    We put people in prison for one of three reasons: 1) to rehabilitate them

    /ME wonders aloud how GTA is going to help with option 1.

    /ME also wonders why we have to do one option at a time.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  24. I'd say: give them game-ownership of a car... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...and no points left on their licence, and the objective of driving safely around the city from goal to goal while the rest of the traffic drives it like they stole it and tries to carjack them.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  25. Beggars (OT) by @madeus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is off topic but as a Londoner I feel strongly about it (and for the record, I don't think any adult in jail should have access to a games console unless they are, for example, in a minimum security facility, in which case it's not really relevent if they have access to violent games or not, because volient criminals and those likely to re-offend should not be in minium security jails (IMO)).

    But I digress. On beggers...

    You same the very same people year after year at places like Oxford Circus, going their way down the tube asking for money and stinking up the carrage and pestering people for money.

    I keep running into these fuckers, they are quite happy to pick fights and shout out 'Cunt!' and 'Motherfucker!' at members of the public just because they don't hand over cash to them. I'm fed up with it and would like to see the lot of them doing hard labour, jail or the army. They are NOT simply nice people on the inside. They are NOT all down on their luck. Some of them (most of them, being relatively fit, young, 20-30 year olds) are violent, drug addicted, criminals who will quite happily rob you at knife point if they think they will get away with it. By these people a sandwich (suckered!) and they will very often *throw it at you!* and ask for money, not food (I've seen this happen more than once, and usually accompanied by swearing). Please, if you visit London, don't give money or food or ANY sympathy to these scum, some of us have to live with them. DO buy a copy of the Big Issue however - it provides gainful employment while rasing money for the homeless, it's quite respectable.

    Some of these people are mentally ill and need to be cared for, most of the ones I see just need a swift kick up the arse to get in line with the rest of society and stop leeching of the state (to which we pay such high taxes in the UK), stinking up the city, putting off visitors and getting in the way (and being abusive to, and commiting crimes against) tax paying residents. I consider myself left wing, but I still strongly think people have a duty to the state.

    There are LOTS of options in country like the UK, who's state employs more people in heath care and social services then any other government in Europe (dispite us not having the largest area, or the largest population), it even has more employees than any other *company* in Europe. Our state apparatus is a sociallist legacy, and very extensive.

    Our homeless housing projects are by and large excellent. There are plenty of hostels in the UK, with beds that go empty every night. The waiting list is about 2 weeks (max) for a perminant place. There is no shorting of housing, but to see the same people, month after month, year after year, you wouldn't think it. A one bedroomed flat in London will easily set you back 1,500 USD a month, that's what people on the streets in London say they want, well no, tough shit, go and live somewhere else, they can get a job, work hard and come back in a few years and pay for one themselves - they have no right to expect the state to put them up for gratis in what is the 3rd most expensive city in the world.

    If your living on the streets for years in a country like the UK (which, for those who don't know, has a huge excess of housing in the north). In many cities in Scotland the council *advertise* hosing vacancies ('Contact us, get council housing, no waiting list!') in reasonable areas. I had a friend, a young fit ~22 year old single white male with no dependants, who was employed and quite happily living at home apply to the council for housing (it's cheaper, he was curious to see if he could get anything), and got council housing within the *week*. He must have been the lowest priority canidate, and he still got something right away, he's know bought the house from the council because he liked it so much (and they have too many, so are trying to sell them off).

    I bought a Scottish drunk in north London breakfast in a cafe and asked him how long he had been in London (I refused t

    1. Re:Beggars (OT) by isorox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in Walthamstow, work in Shepherd's Bush, and I know what you mean. Its not confined to London though, Exeter's just the same, albeit on a smaller scale, Manchesters pretty much the same scale. Normally I ignore beggars - but this guy looked like he should have been in hospital, definatly didnt have the heart or energy to kick up a fuss. I didnt think to ask him why he wasnt getting help as I'd had a long day and it was 11PM.

      This was down on the station platform though, Any idea why LUL staff hadnt moved him on?

      I remember a time I was 2p short for a train ticket home at Manc. Oxford road once, couldnt find anything on the floor, but a station worker gave me the dosh.

      As for 1000 per month for a 1 bedroom flat, tell me about it. I'm paying 410 a month for a 4m*4m room in a shared house (albeit with all utilities, sky, cable internet, councili tax etc paid for). Another 90pm for tube and nearly 30% tax and theres not much left.

      I remember a story an old teacher once told me. He met a lad that had left school a few years earlier, joined the army. He had a drinking problem, got discharged, and ended up begging on the streets of manchester. Anyway, the teacher took him for a good meal and found out his life story. After the meal they parted ways, but the lad dropped dead a few hundered yards up the road. The only person at the funeral was my teacher.

      I'm not laying blame on anyone, but somewhere something went wrong wtih this man. Sure he had plenty of chacnes to turn himself round, but you have to wonder why people dont. In many cases beggars are on better "wages" then me - even before taxes, but there are a few genuine cases there. Why arent they in hostels? Why arent they in glaswegian flats? Why are they rooting through bins outside macdonalds - not just in London but in Exeter? Solve the 10% of cases that are genuine, slap major dis-incentives on the rest, and hopefully begging will evaporate.

    2. Re:Beggars (OT) by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      We've got a similar issue outside our religious buildings in the heart of the city.

      The beggers are not allowed on the grounds, and just inside the grounds are signs that say something like "Please donate to reputable charities or the hostel & soup kitchen just down the road." Even so, there are people who sit there, just outside the buildings, begging for money.

      Once I saw a guy that's been there forever, who normally had a sign begging for $10 changed it to ask for $17. I had to stop and ask why he changed his sign, he said more people gave him money: they'd ask if he had change, he'd say no, and they'd give him a $20.

      Sometimes when I see someone new on the street, I'll ask if they are serious about their 'will work for food' sign. If they say they are (It's only happened a few times) I'll bring them to my home, give them 3 hours of yard work, give them food, let them take a shower if they want, and give them some money.

      Solve the 10% of cases that are genuine, slap major dis-incentives on the rest, and hopefully begging will evaporate.
      What kind of dis-incentives? Put them in jail? They'll get 3 hots and a cot, plus games like GTA, and often develop gang ties. You can't fine them since they can claim to not have enough money. The only real dis-incentive would be to force them to actually take a job, but I don't know how you can force someone to be productive. Maybe there should only be four options to these people: (1) take a government-required job (hard labor if physically fit, manufacture or boring non-critical stuff if not fit), (2) get free training and housing through the job corps or military, (3) Plead your case as to why you need state help and cannot work on your own, or (4) get out of town.

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    3. Re:Beggars (OT) by isorox · · Score: 1

      17 dollars! no wonder you get beggars!

  26. Gimme a frikkin' bone here by thirty2bit · · Score: 1

    And I played the Lord Of The Rings game, so gimme your valuables, especially and gold rings because they're mine! My own! My precious!

    When are lawyers going to stop pinning the guilt on the first handy schmuck that comes along?

    Until then, I'm keeping a Taco Bell wrapper in my car so I can blame that little dog if I get pulled over.

  27. Put them back on chaingangs by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Could someone tell me again why I bust my ass 10 hours a day, 4 days a week, while prisoners don't work (or do hospital laundry, tops) and get a playstation? Great message...if I commit a crime, I go to jail, sit around and play video games.

    Meanwhile, I don't know a single state that doesn't have roads in need of work. I'm thinking we could help out the road crews a bit by assigning prison labor to the work the normal road crews dread because it's dangerous or exceedingly difficult. Prisoners can earn their fucking keep.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:Put them back on chaingangs by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      They do work. Generally they make clothes, license plates, etc. or, as you suggest, work fixing roads, breaking rocks, etc.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  28. For the record, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not with you 99%.

  29. The US criminal justice system by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

    This sentence isn't too short. Incarceration simply does not work. I am not aware of the rehabilitation programs in Australia, nor the general crime situation.

    But I can tell you how horrible of a mistake the "tough on crime" initiative in the US has been. It was founded on the studies of just one man (the name eludes me, I'm sure you could look it up if the topic interests you). That was in the early 1970's, and it sounded good to certain people, so longer sentences were instituted. They've been in place ever since, and since then the perecentage of Americans in the jail system has more then doubled (tripled?), and the crime rate, especially violent crimes, has been skyrocketing - very often from past inmates. Recidivism is far higher now than it was before Tough On Crime.

    What's more amusing is that one guy who was so actively supporting the move to this, in just a few years had a complete turnaround, denounced the Tough On Crime initiative, but no one listened.

    Summary: Long sentences do not work. The only effective way to "fix" someone is long, mandatory rehabilitation programs. Simply sticking somone in jail for a lot of years does nothing but make them dependent on the crime system.

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.