Slashdot Mirror


MSN Cuts Unmonitored Chatrooms Around the Globe

letxa2000 writes "According to MSNBC, Microsoft will be shutting down its unmonitored chat services in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia and much of Latin America on October 14th--the day before MSN Messenger will lock out many 3rd party clients. Interestingly, the European manager of MSN is quoted as saying 'This is a decision based upon consumer experiences, child protection and our strategic investment to build up MSN Messenger.' It's starting to become clear that Microsoft is starting up the IM wars again and that the 3rd-party lockout indeed isn't so much about security as it is about marketshare."

20 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. Liker IRC... by Compunerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...only evil comes out of it. Why should people talk about other things than bondage, rape and casual sex? Beats me.

    --
    Computers are like air conditioners.
    - They stop working when you open Windows.
  2. We've got a witch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It's starting to become clear that Microsoft is starting up the IM wars again and that the 3rd-party lockout indeed isn't so much about security as it is about marketshare."

    Your questioning of microsofts motives clearly indicates that you have something to hide. Are you a paedophile?

    We have found a nonce! may we burn him?

    1. Re:We've got a witch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Do you know that pedos use the snail mail too? Perhaps all our letters and parcels should be opened by the Post Office or whatever mail service to make sure that no pedo material is being sent over the snail mail. I for one have nothing to hide, so I have absolutely no objections whatsoever.
      You know, I bet they travel about in cars and busses to. Maybe there should be checkpoints every 10 miles along the roads where cars, lorries (trucks), busses etc. can be stopped and searched by the police in case there is a pedophile or pedophile material?
      I have absolutely nothing to hide! I will enthiusiastically agree to these measures!
      Pedophiles also live in houses. I think our houses should be subject to random, unannounced searches to catch them when they least expect it! I have nothing to hide at all! Let them do it, and start no! Every day wasted is another pedophile opportunity!
      WE MUST ACT NOW, WITHOUT DELAY!

  3. What about Hotmail?! by glassesmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read it was because of spammers and kiddie pr0n..

    I can only hope they shut down Hotmail next, though I feel it is more the S&M version of mail for people that enjoy getting spam in their mailbox.

  4. Re:This is a good thing by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 5, Funny
    Nooo!! For a while now, IRC has been one of the few places where I could (mostly) avoid

    "wher cn i get quake warez?"

    "u r a faggot!"

    "This person used their CD-ROM drive as a cup holder LOLOL!!!111"

    I don't want them all coming back :(

    --
    Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
  5. Re:IRC is next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can't have people talking to each other now can we? Next for UK data retention, every citizen to be required to wear a microphone so that all verbal communication can be logged with GCHQ, sign language to be criminalised. Keep paying your taxes because it's all for the public good.

  6. Re:What's the problem here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Lose the greengrocers' apostrophes, dude!

  7. Re:What's the problem here? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nah, you're missing the strategy: (1) Give away IM; (2) Get everyone in the world to live/breath/eat/sleep your IM service, like Crack; (3) monetize it.

    By and large the sheep will fork out their credit cards to keep the crack coming. Monetizing MSN is MS's wet dream.

    They'll eventually pull it off.

  8. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Personally, I prefer to go to places outside my computer room and talk to people face to face.

    dood, but then the ppl your talking to know your a pimply little boy with a clapped out old car. Online your a rich hansom guy who drives a porche (or a hot chick depending on how you feel)

  9. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Ten year olds should know about sex. This would be an ideal opportunity to provide them with the sexual education they require.

    If people were more aware about sex I bet we wouldn't have such a high teenage pregnancy rate and shit like that.

  10. Re:yeah by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh no! Now IRC will be suddenly full of immature people using some kind of weird form of English! Oh wait...

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  11. Re:What about getting rid of Internet Explorer? by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Funny

    "Harry Potter" in google gives me

    http://www.harrypotter.com/

    as the first link. In fact the entire first page is all fan/official site stuff. Where you got porno out of that I'll never know. Maybe you're kid searched for "Harry can fuck me hard all potter day?"

    As for the "preventitive measures" what's wrong with just talking to your kids? When I was young my parents warned me about talking to strangers, taking paths alone [e.g. hidden from plain view from the street], etc....

    It isn't upto corporations to raise the current generation of kids just like it wasn't upto television to raise the past five or so decades of kids.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  12. Re:IRC is next by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
    But irc isn't unmoderated, we have botnets and generally (outside of the occasional EFNET DOS) have pretty good control over our channels. Oh you meant THEIR control...

    Are you insane? You can't just have unmoderated instant global communications networks without SOME kind of government regulation or corporate oversight. What do you think this is, 1995? It would be anarchy! IRC channels would be filled with child molesters and pedophiles, copyrighted material would be sent back and forth without the owners' consent, and the government would be unable to effectively monitor your communications for terrorist activity.

  13. (Unfinished sentence) by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh no! Now IRC will be suddenly full of immature people using some kind of weird form of English! Oh wait...

    ... I'm thinking of Slashdot

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  14. The Children? by fire-eyes · · Score: 0, Funny

    Like George Carlin says:

    "Everyone's always whining about 'what about the children?' and 'save the children' blah blah. Know what I say? FUCK the children. That's right, FUCK EM."

    Or something along those lines.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
  15. Re:yeah by TiggsPanther · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn! There goes my unique IRC characteristic. :-/

    --
    Tiggs
    "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  16. Re:IRC is next by jsmyth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Chatrooms were always a waste of time anyway imho...

    Horses for courses :)
    From the Jargon file:

    Hackers who don't indulge in Usenet consider it a huge waste of time and bandwidth; fans of old adventure games such as ADVENT and Zork consider MUDs to be glorified chat systems devoid of atmosphere or interesting puzzles; hackers who are willing to devote endless hours to Usenet or MUDs consider IRC to be a real waste of time; IRCies think MUDs might be okay if there weren't all those silly puzzles in the way.

    --
    jer

    We may be human, but we're still animals
    - Steve Vai
  17. Re:I don't blame them by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Here in the UK there is a lengthy screening process for anyone who work with children

    A 14 year old leaves her parents and takes enough money to go halfway around the globe without her parents knowing about it? Maybe the UK needs a lengthy screening process for would-be parents..If the government thinks you can't raise a child, maybe they shouldn't let you procreate..This way, the rest of us won't suffer.

  18. Re:Article in Metro by troc · · Score: 1, Funny

    That was the guy's problem, he should have tried to buy her with cash :)

    Sorry.

    troc.

    --
    Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  19. Re:It's all about pedophiles by pmz · · Score: 2, Funny

    "protecting children"

    Even if we do the right thing for protecting our chilren (permanently locking them into a padded basement, obviously), we have this critical dilemma:

    1) No sunlight can lead to soft bones, nutrient deficiency, and obvious harm.
    2) Sunlight can lead to skin cancer, "leather face" (for the teen beach bunnies out there), and obvious harm.

    Damn.

    Okay, the right way to protect the children, then, is to have no children. Problem solved.

    What, even this isn't satisfactory? What do you mean you want kids?

    Ah, crap.