Slashdot Mirror


AMD Moves Closer To Linux PDA

Ryan writes "Mobilemag is reporting that AMD has advanced the prototype design of their current Linux-based PDA handheld, adding full-screen video capabilities, and completing work on the device's battery charger. The device is based on AMD's 400MHz Alchemy 1100 processor." However, "AMD has yet to find a hardware maker that has committed to bringing the Alchemy-based reference design to market as a commercial product."

123 comments

  1. phear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    Acronym Overload:
    AMD to announce ETA for OEMs on GNU/Linux 400 MHz PDA RSN.

    1. Re:phear. by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      You should join the AAAAA.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    2. Re:phear. by Mr.+Moose · · Score: 1

      I for one phear our new acronym overlords... Ok, bad one... couldn't resist...

  2. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    AMD Inc. has begun showing an updated reference design for a PDA running the Linux operating system to hardware makers, according to a company executive.

    The announcement brings the reference design one step closer to availability as a commercial product.

    Based on AMD's 400MHz Alchemy 1100 processor, an early prototype of the PDA reference design was demonstrated in August by the company at the LinuxWorld Conference & Expo in San Francisco.

    Since then, AMD has advanced the prototype's design with the addition of full-screen video capabilities and has completed work on the device's battery charger, said Phil Pompa, vice president of marketing for AMD's Personal Connectivity Solutions group, in an interview on the sidelines of the Computex exhibition here last week.

    "It's certainly at the point where we can go hand to this to an OEM," Pompa said, adding that AMD is currently working on improvements to the design's power management capabilities

    The Au1100-based PDA runs Metrowerks Corp.'s Linux-based OpenPDA software suite, which includes an embedded Linux kernel and a range of software, such as applications for playing music and video files. OpenPDA also includes Trolltech AS's Qtopia multilingual user interface, Opera Software ASA's Opera Web browser, and support for both Personal Java and J2ME (Java 2 Platform Micro Edition).

    AMD sees the ability to play full-screen video as a key feature of the PDA reference design, Pompa said, demonstrating the design's ability to play full-screen video on a 320-pixel by 240-pixel screen with no screen artifacts and without the assistance of a graphics processor.

    "If you're really going to use this as a multimedia device, you have got to have good-quality video," Pompa said.

    Video capabilities aside, AMD has yet to find a hardware maker that has committed to bringing the Alchemy-based reference design to market as a commercial product. But Pompa said hardware makers have already shown interest in the reference design.

    "We're showing it to our customer base," Pompa said, adding that one hardware maker had been given a prototype to show to a customer at Computex last week.

    1. Re:Article text by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      "It's certainly at the point where we can go hand to this to an OEM," Pompa said, adding that AMD is currently working on improvements to the design's power management capabilities

      "however, by the time he gets it back to the office, the batteries are dead."

  3. Those seem cool... by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 5, Funny


    as long as I can use a command line instead of that pen thing.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Those seem cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, typing on the screen with your fingertips makes a whole lot more sense than with that silly pen thing.

    2. Re:Those seem cool... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      The Zaurus allows you to do that. I use the command line more than the gui on my SL-5500.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
  4. I love you, AMD by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Portable Handwarmers, yay! Now I don't need to buy any more mittens.

    1. Re: I love you, AMD by mechugena · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but these will be a lot clumsier when they're pinned to your sleeves!

    2. Re: I love you, AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha. Yes. AMD is hot. Yep. Intel is not hot at all. Nope. Prescott does not exist.

      Haha. You're a funny man. You should do standup.

    3. Re: I love you, AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I honestly don't understand why this is rated "funny". Not only is this joke old, but AMD chips have been *less* power hungry than the competition (i.e. Intel) for a long time. Even more so with the next generation (AMD64 vs. P4EE/Prescott).

    4. Re: I love you, AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was funny for the same reason that Bush's drinking problem is funny even though he no longer drinks. Some jokes never die.

    5. Re: I love you, AMD by dpw2atox · · Score: 0

      and some jokes should be shot and put out of their misery just like this one.

    6. Re: I love you, AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Given that vacant, eye watering, stare he gives at press conferences and the like, I'm really not so sure he's not still at the bottle.

      Of course, we'd never know, would we.

    7. Re: I love you, AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind you, this Alchemy Au1100 processor has nothing to do with the Athlons. It's basically a brethren of the MIPS family of RISC chips and probably just as power-efficient as its ARM and PPC cousins...

  5. Reminds me of IBM's PPC motherboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By the time anything like them hit the market, they were nearly obsolete.

  6. But? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have they fixed the file dialog yet?

  7. AMD? Overclock! by eaglebtc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember to bridge the L1 and L2 gaps. Then you'll need to slap on a Zalman copper heatsink or a Vantec aeroflow on the back of the PDA. How's that for overclocking? Now you can put in your contacts and record voice memos even faster!

    And it's Linux...so why not run a server?

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
    1. Re:AMD? Overclock! by SoIosoft · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not run a server? Because it'd suck to be late for a meeting with a client due to your PDA being Slashdotted. :)

      --
      Help me. I've been modbombed by a few people with entirely too much time on their hands.
    2. Re:AMD? Overclock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running a server on your pda isn't completely ridiculous. Ten years from now I expect we'll always be broadcasting a several gigabyte wireless fileshare from our pda's, so that where ever we are we can mount our /home and start working.

    3. Re:AMD? Overclock! by wafflemonger · · Score: 1

      An easier way to record voice memos faster -- Talk faster.

  8. Re:What I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have to ask then I doubt your overt Mensa pretensions..

  9. Re:Temprature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful, son, that PDA's overclocked to 900MHz. You wouldn't wanna burn your Johnson now, would ya?

  10. Yay for AMD by obsidianpreacher · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, that's great and all, but can it run ...

    Oh ... it can.

    --
    topreacher@signature.slashdot.org 1% rm -rf sig
  11. Most Definitely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new portable penguin overlords.

  12. Why is the AMD proc Linux Specific by StingRayGun · · Score: 1

    Are they also working on Palm/Windows prototypes?

    I would love more Linux based palm-type devices, but what is so special about OpenPDA? Why is AMD only messing with Linux? If they are really looking for customers for their new palm-proc, shouldnt they be shopping it as OS independant?

    1. Re:Why is the AMD proc Linux Specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not linux specific, it can run linux or Windows CE. I never heard anything about palm, but they'd work with them if Palm showed an interest. Bottom line - they sell chips, not consumer gizmos.

      But this is slashdot, so you only hear half of the story.

    2. Re:Why is the AMD proc Linux Specific by nchip · · Score: 1

      I think the main reason is that alchemy is MIPS based, while vast majority of pockepc's are ARM-based, palms are moving from m68k to ARM, symbian hasn't even seen on a non-ARM platform. So while theoretically you could run pockepc on a alchemy board, you still won't run all the nice ipaq apps on it.

      On the other hand, recompiling Linux apps for alchemy/MIPS is very trivial.

      --
      signatures pending - ansa@kos.to - (dont mail there)
    3. Re:Why is the AMD proc Linux Specific by LionMage · · Score: 1

      Funny that once upon a time, most PocketPC/Windows CE devices were MIPS based, and a few were SH3/SH4 (Hitachi) based. So much so that MIPS was virtually synonymous with Windows CE device. Now that there are several ARM and StrongARM flavors out there, that seems to be the CPU architecture of choice; even Palm has seen the light, and uses the ARM architecture (although only the ultra-high-end Palm devices get the StrongARM -- the rest get the TI OMAP chip, which has a little less horsepower but has a built-in DSP).

      It's also amusing to me that the ARM architecture is what the entire Newton line was built around from day one. It took forever for the other PDA vendors to get around to adopting the ARM processor, perhaps because of the perceived taint of the Newton. (Which is a pity, as I liked the Newton very much.)

      I don't know if the major WinCE/PocketPC developers are still cross-compiling their applications for MIPS, SH3/4 and ARM, but up until I gave up on WinCE/PocketPC devices entirely (due to a bad experience with an early iPaq model), I saw that most developers supplied binaries for most or all architectures, and some even supplied binaries specifically tweaked for StrongARM (as opposed to, or in addition to, generic ARM binaries).

      Bottom line? I think the emphasis on Linux has more to do with AMD's perception of the industry -- which lately has been pushing embedded Linux as a low cost embedded OS -- and the desire to differentiate their reference platform from everyone else's Microsoft-centric offerings.

  13. Portable XviD player? by Sheepdot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    AMD sees the ability to play full-screen video as a key feature of the PDA reference design, Pompa said, demonstrating the design's ability to play full-screen video on a 320-pixel by 240-pixel screen with no screen artifacts and without the assistance of a graphics processor.

    Am I reading this properly? Can this thing play highly compressed AVI files or is this some sort of video compression specifically for a PDA?

    What about XviD?

    1. Re:Portable XviD player? by Dielectric · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure, you might be able to code up an XviD decoder. The Au1100 has an onboard graphics controller, and a pretty fast memory interface which is key. I've seen the MPEG decoding real-time on this processor and it works pretty well. This isn't their normal x86 processor, it's a low-power MIPS32 core.

    2. Re:Portable XviD player? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note: AVI is just a container. There's others, like Matroshka Video (.MPV I think?) The real question you should be asking is, does this thing have enough horsepower to play an MPEG4 video stream. At that low resolution, that might be within the device's limits.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Portable XviD player? by maharg · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks pretty cool - http://www.amd.com/us-en/ConnectivitySolutions/Pro ductInformation/0,,50_2330_6625_6012%5E8407,00.htm l

      Handheld Computing Device
      3.0x5.5x0.8 inches
      2.1x2.8-inch Portrait Mode Panel

      266MHz 400MHz Operation
      MIPS32 Instruction Set
      1.2V Core Operating Voltage, 3.3V I/O

      64 Mbytes SDRAM
      32 Mbytes AMD Flash Memory

      Video Support
      TFT QVGA Panel with LED Frontlight
      Integrated Touchscreen

      Li Polymer Battery
      Target Normal Operation 2.5 - 4 Hours
      Removable and Rechargeable through Docking Station or with AC Adapter

      Compact Flash Memory Slot
      Secure Digital Card Slot
      Audio via WM9705 Wolfson AC-97 CODEC
      Integrated Speaker, Stereo Headphone Jack
      Integrated Microphone
      IrDA
      Integrated Joystick
      4 Programmable Buttons
      USB Type B (Device) Connector

      Docking Station
      USB Type A (Host) Connector
      USB Type B (Device) Connector
      10/100 Ethernet Connection
      DC Jack for Standard AC Adapter
      Serial Connector
      EJTAG

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    4. Re:Portable XviD player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing full-screen AVI's is hardly a feat for a 200MHz processor, let alone 400MHz.

      http://www.thekompany.com/embedded/tkcvideo/

    5. Re:Portable XviD player? by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

      Btw, Matroshka is actually .mkv (at least that's what the Matroshka files I have are named))

    6. Re:Portable XviD player? by Jameth · · Score: 1

      Apparently you've never played a high-quality video. Even with hard-ware acceleration, a well-compressed MPEG4 stream at a good bitrate needs at least a 500MHz to play without frame-drop.

    7. Re:Portable XviD player? by iantri · · Score: 1

      Well, my 350mhz x86 (Pentium 2) is fast enough to play up to about 512x384x30fps at 1300kbps DivX/XviD video, so I'd think it likely that this handheld could.

  14. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Participate in a meeting while crunching Folding@Home data on your beowulf cluster why don't ya!

  15. Jeopardy by happyfrogcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll take "PDAs You'll Never See Again" for $500, Alex...

    oh wait, that was last article

    1. Re:Jeopardy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'll take "Flogging a Dead Joke to Death" for $1000, please Alex..

    2. Re:Jeopardy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And now it's time for final jeapordy. The category is: ALL YOUR BASE

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Jeopardy by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      "'Beowulf Cluster of these,' 'In Soviet Russia,' and '3) Profit!'"

      "What are the top three lame Slashdot jokes?"

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    4. Re:Jeopardy by Enonu · · Score: 1

      What is "those three people have never been in my kitchen?"

    5. Re:Jeopardy by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Personally the gay slashdot joke I hate most is the evil meta-joke of "I for one welcome our lame joke overlords" every time somebody posts another "new XXX overlords" joke.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  16. Looks great by Ianoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure, YALPDA, but it looks as though it's as capable as any of the others out there. I see it runs Qtopia too... sensible choice considering the large number of people developing for it (and its various forks, in case Trolltech ever trys to call in fees on the technology, but I doubt they'd be stupid enough to do this!).

    This appears to be becoming almost a "de facto" standard for PDA development. The useful thing though, when compared to PPC or POS is that it doesn't really matter what hardware it's running on, so unlike Microsoft or PalmSource, companies won't have their exact hardware specifications dictated in advance.

    Hopefully this should lead to some real innovation (and looks like it already is) rather than heaps and heaps of PDAs that look and work exactly the same just because they run the same operating system, even right down to the number of hardware buttons they happen to have. I've always considered this a little silly.

  17. cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OT, re sig: I just can't bring myself to click on a link that ends in .cx (anymore)

  18. roflmao @ parent by eaglebtc · · Score: 1

    does anyone not see the irony in this?

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
  19. linux.... FINALLY by Tr0mBoNe- · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think its great that someone out there is taking another look at the PDA world... If we start thinking that Windows for PDAs is the only thing out there, then we are only exploring a small portion of this universe.

    Also, there are literally millions of programs I would want to put on my linux based PDA... just think... a mobile version of the GNU C Compilier. That would make my lifetime.

    I'm just waiting for the day my friend's windows based PDA gets a blue screen of death. "Where's the CTRL + ALT + DEL!!?!??!"

    --
    while(1) { fork(); };
  20. Another Linux PDA. by LordArathres · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seriosly folks, how many Linux PDA's do we need. I mean we hear stories about them ALL the time and then they vanish. The problem is that they go away and the people who got them are now stuck with a PDA with no future upgrades. Maybe AMD can support such a device but I doubt it will be profitable. How many people here actually would buy this thing when it came out? I would not because I dont need one and the last PDA I bought I never used because it was bulky and hated carrying it around, I dont carry anything that doesnt fit in my pocket. I Linux PDA/Cellphone that is the size of a cell phone is what I need, I would buy that one.

    Arathres.

    1. Re:Another Linux PDA. by Dielectric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sneaky thing is that it will run WinCE as well. That just doesn't get mentioned because this is Slashdot after all.

      AMD wants to make chips, not finished consumer hardware. This is a reference design for an ODM or OEM to pick up and run away with. It's basically a "Here you go, market this and build it yourself, then buy the processor and the flash memory from us. Love ya, AMD."

      So, basically, if someone in Korea took the hardware design and optimized it for a small form factor, you'd get what you want. Don't be looking to AMD for it, though.

    2. Re:Another Linux PDA. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point of a linux PDA is that you are never stuck with no upgrades. It's running linux! You have the source! You can personally update it. Meanwhile an assortment of tiny linux distributions are being quietly pieced together to unify all of these PDAs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Another Linux PDA. by 3872 · · Score: 1
      Seriosly

      There. I've stopped reading your illiterate garbage.

      --

      The real 3872 has the sig "Bruce Perens." Anyone else is an impostor.
    4. Re:Another Linux PDA. by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Seriosly folks, how many Linux PDA's do we need.
      Enough that someone finally makes the one that I want. I haven't seen it yet, but there have been a few that come close.
      The problem is that they go away and the people who got them are now stuck with a PDA with no future upgrades.
      That problem applies to all hardware. Are you suggesting there is no longer a market for personal computers, either? ;-)
      the last PDA I bought I never used because it was bulky and hated carrying it around, I dont carry anything that doesnt fit in my pocket. I Linux PDA/Cellphone that is the size of a cell phone is what I need, I would buy that one.
      Sounds like somebody wants companies to keep coming out with Linux PDAs.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    5. Re:Another Linux PDA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty self-righteous for someone who thinks "There." is a complete sentence. As usual, grammar Nazi hoist on own petard, yada yada yada...

    6. Re:Another Linux PDA. by LordArathres · · Score: 1

      It would be nice to have a Cell Phone/PDA Linux combo that I can use. I dont like anything out there now becuase it is just too big.

      Arathres

    7. Re:Another Linux PDA. by LordArathres · · Score: 1

      How can I write something illeterate garbage if you stop after the 1st word. So I misspelled it, I am not a spelling teacher. I was hoping that you would be a little smarter and figure it out.

      Arathres

    8. Re:Another Linux PDA. by yog · · Score: 1

      The AMD reference design may not make it in the long term but it is still significant news. It's quite possible that a few years from now, the only surviving PDA designs will be generic, Linux-powered platforms made by all sorts of no-name factories in China, India, etc. If the software is free, the hardware is more likely to standardize and become a commodity, much as the PC did. I hope this happens and we'll see $25 PDAs that do just about everything the average person needs. Too bad for Palm and MS; they'll have to innovate to stay in the race.

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    9. Re:Another Linux PDA. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > sneaky thing is that it will run WinCE as well

      Yes... sad. Remember the Itsy? Digital had this cool GNU/Linux prototype in their labs for years, when Compaq bought them it was launched running MS WCE, named iPaq...

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    10. Re:Another Linux PDA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But as I remember Microsoft dropped support for all but the ARM processor in Pocket PC 2003

  21. Smokey the Bear says... by flowbee64 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When using your AMD based PDA at the campgrounds, always practice safety. Surround your PDA with rocks to keep the fire from spreading. Be sure when you're done with your PDA to put it out with a bucket of water and make sure it has stopped smoking before you leave the area.

    Remember what Smokey the Bear says. Only you can prevent your AMD based PDA from starting a forest fire.


    --
    "I, for one, welcome our new %INSERT ARTICLE SUBJECT HERE% overlords."
  22. Re:What I don't understand. by Ianoo · · Score: 1

    It has handwriting recognition, and although the processor probably isn't fast enough, it'll run almost any Linux application (so speech recognition and speech synthesis should work fine, thanks very much) on the command line. And as Linux developers have always leaned towards a separation between function and GUI, it should be relatively easy to port graphical applications, too (QT in particular, but more generally, any well-written app should make it easy to change the GUI without looking at the entire code base. Look at Xine, XMMS, Lyx). I'd also like to see a PPC or POS machine act as a handheld web server. IBM's new form factor sounds great, but it's already here, considering what can be done with these Linux PDAs.

  23. Sounds like the AMD Zaurus by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

    It's running the same Qtopia, the same Java, and the same Opera, it looks like a Zaurus, but with full screen video capabilities, and AMD inside. Is there something I'm missing? Oh, other than the Zaurus having the built in keyboard?

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
    1. Re:Sounds like the AMD Zaurus by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the Zaurus does do some decent video with Tkcvideo, as long as you encode correctly.

  24. You kick puppies for fun, don't you? by Thud457 · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's wrong with a little pussy?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:You kick puppies for fun, don't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I was hesitant to click that link... but not being familiar with the site I was quite intrigued and decided I could use some good shock value...

      I just want to say that the link you posted is the most awful site ever imagined! I just can't seem to get the image out of my head. If I had mod points, you'd definitely get them.

  25. Alchemy and Design by Mattb90 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Alchemy-based? Does that mean some medieval folk at AMD put some copper and lead powder together in a conical flask and boil it in an attempt to make Gold and they ended up with a reference design? On a seperate note; the AMD device reminds me of Dell's recent Digital Music Jukebox. The oblong buttons along the bottom and the white rounded rim certainly have a similar appeal, although both lacking the style of their rivals (the iPaq and iPod respectively).

    --
    Mattb90
    Editor, allaboutgames.co.uk
  26. morons closer to planet/population rescue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    than previously thought.

    that's right. pay attention (if not to us, then to yOUR heart, environment, etc...) as a means to avoid being taken further into hostagedumb buy phonIE /.?pr? ?firm? stock markup execrable hypenosys.

  27. Re:What I don't understand. by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Umm... folks, I may be wrong, but this comment doesn't look like flamebait to me. I don't think that he's saying that it isn't ready for the desktop... I think he's offering the handwriting and speech recognition as proof that it is... But I could be wrong.

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
  28. Do what Apple Computer does... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    and complete EVERYTHING to make it work and find a Taiwanese manufacturer to make it, then sell it on its own website. They'll called it the AMD Store, start the AlchemyTunes online music store (MP3 downloads WITHOUT DRM), and make it a competitor to the iPod. Also, it could come with AlchemyMovie, a built-in camera for making and storing videos, like amature rockets (http://www.gbrocketry.com/). It should come with a wireless internet connection, for hosting a wireless website (damn near impossible to take down if given a cease and desist order). Where are they going to find you? Also, it should come with those little eyeglass montiors and a small Palm-like keyboard, so I can do all my geeking around in the command line on the bus, train, airport shuttle service in the comfort of my own little visual world. Hell, throw in a microphone for speech recognition. Gosh, brain storming about this is fun, man, I could be a gadget-makers "idea" guy.

    Seriously though, I think they should market it themselves and get feedback from the Slashdot community. I liked the portable handwarmer post - NO MORE MITTENS!

  29. Hmm... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    ... Let's see, it's handheld, has an AMD processor, and will probably fly of shelves. What should they call it? Hmm.. how about... FIREBIRD!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has an AMD owned processor design not an AMD designed processor.
      The CPU is a MIPS32 derivative.

  30. Re:What I don't understand. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Easy, because you limit the UI to something like Qtopia. Desktop linux is so unlimited that to most people if you change the Window Manager, they'll think it is a new OS.

  31. Re:Temprature by RedTyde · · Score: 3, Insightful
    AMD chips weren't always hotter than Intel chip. It's really only the Athlons that are hotter. The P60 and P66's were so hot (running at 5 volts) that people actually claimed that the computers they came in would occasionally catch fire.

    Most of the time, the Intel chips actually ran hotter. I had an AMD 486 running at 160MHz that didn't even need a fan, just a heatsink.

    Even as late as the Pentium III, Intel chips ran very hot.

    You also have to consider the typical "My chip is way too hot" source. My stock Athlon is running at 44C under load. However, my overclocked running at 2.2v Athlon rarely dips below 62C. People overclocking (and AMD is more overclocking friendly) are going to have more "I'm overheating" stories.

    Prehaps it could be marketed as a small pocket heater
    They will probably list this right under, "It makes perfect Julian fries!"
  32. pda feature set by Dark+Fire · · Score: 1

    Include a sensor for detecting pda movement in 3 dimensions. It would make a simple and yet very innovative input device.

    They sell sensors:

    http://www.ballsemi.com

  33. Re:Temprature by hawkbug · · Score: 1

    Well, then you haven't looked at the temp differences between AMD/Intel cpus in a LONG time. Have you seen how hot the Pentium 4 gets and how much heat it dissepates?? The fact of the matter is, Via and Transmeta both make x86 cpus that put off low amounts of heat. AMD and Intel don't have anything that compares - unless you're going to tell me that the Pentium M or Centrino offerings are low power... I guess that dependson what your definition of low power is.

  34. Re:What I don't understand. by mikk · · Score: 1

    And why do you think that Linux isn't ready for the desktop yet?
    If you think that stuff like handwriting and speech recognition is too sophisticated for Linux, then how the hell are Beowulf clusters possible?

    I say that Linux is ready for the desktop and for the PDA but not all the users are ready for Linux.

    I'm not trying to insult someone but it is what I think.

  35. Reads Like Dot-Com Vaporware :) by johnthorensen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've taken the liberty of performing a little editing (i.e. replacing "AMD" with a fictional dot-com "Handtasia"...how much does this sound like something we've heard oh so many times before...

    Handtasia has begun showing an updated reference design for a PDA running the Linux operating system to hardware makers, according to a company executive.

    The announcement brings the reference design one step closer to availability as a commercial product.

    Based on Handtasia's 400GHz FoolsGold 11000 processor, an early prototype of the PDA reference design was demonstrated in August by the company at the LinuxWorld Conference & Expo in San Francisco, alongside offerings from 1,376 other Linux handheld vendors.

    Since then, Handtasia has advanced the prototype's design with the addition of full-screen video capabilities and has completed work on the device's battery charger, said Phil Poma, vice president of marketing for Handtasia's Personal Connectivity Solutions Magic Integration Synergetic group, in an interview on the floor of the local CompUSA here last week.

    "Sears really helped us out on the battery charger issue. Looks like Diehard doesn't just know batteries - they make a quality 12 volt charging product. We're also pleased at a recent discovery that removing the back cover and laying the LCD on an overhead projector gave a nice full-screen picture. My son Billy thought he would be fired for dropping the prototype and breaking that cover off but we just approved a nice stock-option package for his brilliant idea. Between Sears and Billy, it's certainly at the point where we can go hand to this to an OEM," Poma said, adding that Handtasia is currently working on improvements to the design's power management capabilities such as a bundled 2 KW Honda gasoline generator that will allow you to use the product virtually anywhere.

    The FG11000-based PDA runs Vaporwerks Corp.'s Linux-based OpenPEEDA software suite, which includes an embedded Linux kernel and a range of software, such as applications for playing music and video files. OpenPEEDA also includes Trollbridge AS's UtopiaMUD multilingual user dungeon, Diva Software ASA's Diva Web browser, and full support for XML, Enterprise Resource Management, Wi-FI, .Net, P2P, B2B, P2B, B2P, SOAP, DDC, Java, J2ME, plus many other buzzwords.

    Handtasia sees the ability to play full-screen video as a key feature of the PDA reference design, Poma said, demonstrating the design's ability to play Jenna Jameson's latest DVD, converted to MPEG1 on a 320-pixel by 240-pixel screen with no screen artifacts and without the assistance of a graphics processor.

    "If you're really going to use this as a multimedia device, you have got to have the ability to play porn and still be able to see the pink parts. We're talking major hard...ware," Poma said.

    Video capabilities aside, Handtasia has yet to find a hardware maker that has committed to bringing the FoolsGold-based reference design to market as a commercial product. But Poma said hardware makers have already shown interest in the reference design.

    "We're showing it to our customer base, and have gotten good responses from Joe that works down the street at Frank's Liquor. We're a little worried about his production capacity, but I think that's something that can be worked out with a little more venture capital," Poma said, adding that one "hardware maker" had been given a prototype to show to a customer at the gas station next to CompUSA last week.

  36. You sir, are an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Handwriting recognition and speech recognition are not usually used on ordinary linux desktops. Besides gnome 2.4 supports it if you need it.

    I'm not going to go through the flamewars again (theres OS-fud for that). But remember that youre compairing apples to oranges here. It is possible to squeeze kde or gnome onto a pda, but it wouldn't work well. Thats why we have Qtopia, Opie and other specialised subsets of those desktops.

    Linux is ready, as its always been. If your problem is with configuation then you are probably using a crappy distro, as I don't recall having to edit any text files or compile kernels recently on my distro. as It all "just works", contrary to what Eugina and her fellow trolls claims on OSfud.

  37. I liked it better when it was called "Zaurus" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I have Linux, Java, and full screen Divx video (tkcVideo is the software, not great in terms of features but plays video fine) on my 200MHz Zaurus. The new Zaurus is 400MHz . I can stream movies over 802.11 via an NFS-mounted partition (barely.. you have to really lower the bitrate.. otherwise playing them from a CF card is fine on the road).

    Consider me completely unimpressed by this platform. Maybe if it was 1GHz, had a beautiful OLED display, built-in 802.11g and Bluetooth, and a 2Mp camera, and cost < $1000, maybe then I would look twice.

    By the time they find an interested buyer, this product will be obsolete.

    The real problem, in my opinion, is SOFTWARE on Linux handhelds, not hardware. The Zaurus hardware is nearly perfect for me, but the software is crap. Unfortunately only Apple could probably pull off a good Unix handheld but they said they aren't going to make one. Oh well!

  38. Battery time? by asuzuki · · Score: 1

    400 Mhz processor, 320x240 screen... I wonder how long this thing will run without a recharge.

  39. new in market by laydros · · Score: 0

    i personally love the palm os, and pocket pc isn't terrible, but after selling pdas at omax, i kinda felt like the market was stale. sharp wasn't really able to get the zarus outthere widespread, mainly because of cost maybe amds stuff can fix this problem, and a unit with a free os will actually be cheaper than one with a closed os

  40. Re:What I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all custom software, Mensa fucknut. You know, the kind PDA manufacturers make themselves...

  41. have never bought PDA but by zymano · · Score: 1

    If they could show the same usefulness as the graphing calculators then i would consider buying one. The price would need to be less than $150 .

    1. Re:have never bought PDA but by Sarin · · Score: 1

      If they could show the same usefulness as the graphing calculators then i would consider buying one.

      hey this baby can also play porn dude, so I guess it doubles in usefulness

  42. Is that a PDA in your pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or are you happy to see me? Pocket video porn-the ultimate application.

  43. Acronyms? by sharkey · · Score: 1
    YALPDA

    You're A Lawyer Pig-Doinking Asshole?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  44. Re:What I don't understand. by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
    If Linux is not ready for the desktop yet, then how can it be usable on a PDA.

    Begs the question, "Is PalmOS ready for the Desktop?"

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  45. what a waste... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Personally, I see nothing I like on this reference PDA from AMD. The case is so ugly you'd think someone at Dell *designed* it. It runs Linux. Great. How much money did AMD waste on this when Intel and TI have a lock on this market? IBM has already shown a reference PDA for Linux based upon PPC architecture and we still haven't seen one PDA from an actual manufacturer come across the assembly line based upon it. Granted, the PPC chipset is probably the best idea for a PDA and its too bad the genuises at Motorola didn't think about it ages ago instead of trying to sell a modified version of the 20+ year old Motorola 68000 forever to companies like Palm; had that happened, PocketPC would not be strong at all in the PDA market. If they wanted credibility, they should've sought funding from Palm and Microsoft (if not IBM since they will be the actual producer of the chips under contract) to demonstrate that Palm OS and PocketPC OS could run viably on this platform alternative. As it stands now, it appears AMD wasted money they should've spent toward closing the physical megahertz deficiency they have with Intel on x86.

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    1. Re:what a waste... by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      Had you bothered to research it, you'd see that the plastic is irrelevant, that it does run PocketPC, and that reference designs make the world go 'round.

      The Alchemy/AMD design group is completely separate from the x86 group. The design motivations are completely different. Move away from your PC and realize that hundreds of times more embedded processors are sold every year than PC processors. AMD still ships 186 processors by the millions, while the retail boxes sit on store shelves.

    2. Re:what a waste... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Had you bothered to research it, you'd see that the plastic is irrelevant, that it does run PocketPC"

      Yes, but I stated PocketPC AND Palm OS.

      "The Alchemy/AMD design group is completely separate from the x86 group. The design motivations are completely different. Move away from your PC and realize that hundreds of times more embedded processors are sold every year than PC processors."

      Yes, I understand that. However, PDA's today generally run on ARM based chips, whether they are provided by Intel or TI, not AMD or IBM/Motorola. Whether AMD sells a bunch of chips to embedded device manufacturers is moot to the whole PDA argument. We've also seen past behavior on the part of AMD in selling off chip divisions outside of their microprocessor expertise, as with networking and WiFi. We've seen Intel stumble with graphics chips, again something outside their skills (and I won't even touch their backing of Rambus memory)...

      And I'm still right about the design of the "plastic". Its ugly.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    3. Re:what a waste... by MCRocker · · Score: 1
      The case is so ugly you'd think someone at Dell *designed* it.


      It's a reference design. It's not supposed to compete with the snazzy design that their customers will create, just show the design engineers how the thing goes together.
      --
      Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  46. At 250 mW? A day or so of continuous use Id guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Li+ cell phone battery, of which I think you could easily put a couple of in a PDA, says it supplies 720 mAh at 3.6 V. Which works out to about 10 hours for 250 mW.

  47. Er heh by oGMo · · Score: 1
    I've taken the liberty of performing a little editing (i.e. replacing "AMD" with a fictional dot-com "Handtasia"...how much does this sound like something we've heard oh so many times before...

    So you argue that this is dot-com vaporware, because by replacing key terms with a fictional and cheap-sounding words, it looks like dot-com vaporware? ;-) You realize this is like the textbook definition of a Straw Man argument right?

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Er heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to version 0.6 of The /. Troll HOWTO links section, you should examine the following List of Fallacious Arguments page and quote, "Learn them and use them liberally." Fallacy of Extension however, is an argument that most can practice without doing so in a different meaning of the word.

  48. As good or better than the X-Scale/OMAP PDAs... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    It dissipates less power than a comparable X-Scale does, so I'd think it'd be in the same ballpark or better. And, an X-Scale doesn't do full motion, full screen video QUITE as well at the 400MHz range.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  49. Need... by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting
    2 weeks battery life minimum.

    A "Keyboard" of some sort. None of that graffiti crap for me.

    EMACS.

    No, this isn't a troll. Emacs does everything I need it to do. Seriously. It's got all the PIM functionality in a well-integrated set of programs and it's easily extensible. And the MIT remembrance agent is way cool. Nothing else I've run across comes remotely close to its functionality.

    The Sharp Zaurus was pretty close to my needs except that the battery life really sucked.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Need... by kinnell · · Score: 1

      The PDA you are looking for is a psion 5mx + cf memory card + psilinux. They're no longer in production, so look on ebay.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    2. Re:Need... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      2 weeks battery life minimum.


      Why? In everday use you would put your PDA in to the charger ever day. So why 2 weeks? for those treks through the wilderness? In case you get stranded on a desert island? Yeah right....
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    3. Re:Need... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      No I wouldn't. I keep the damn thing in my pocket most of the time. I almost never put it in the charger. And it's inconvenient to pack the charger when I go on vacation. I already have an inconvenient PDA, my laptop. And it already runs EMACS. If a PDA can't offer me benefit over that, I'll just stick with the laptop.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:Need... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      No I wouldn't. I keep the damn thing in my pocket most of the time.


      Even when you sleep? It really doesn't take that much effort to put it in it's charger at the end of the day. And I bet the charger does not take that much space, so taking it with you on vacation is not really a problem.

      But hey, if you want a PDA with two weeks of power (is it just me, or are these demands getting more and more ridiculous? Next year people are propably insisting that PDA's must have "immersive, 100% realistic virtual-reality interface. Otherwise: forget it!"), then prepare yourself for a long wait.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  50. Re:Temprature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not an AMD design, it's an Alchemy MIPS32 chip.
    RTFA

  51. So sad Palm ruined idea of superior i/o method by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    The damage Palm did to the general publics' perception of the usefulness of the pen interface is truly sad.

    I know the Apple Message Pad (A.K.A Newton) was overpriced and that Apple was not responsive to user demands. However, they clearly showed that the pen interface could be more than just effective. The Newton OS showed that the pen interface could be clearly superior in many cases. Now, nobody in their right mind would even consider taking notes to a lecture on a pen based device or mini keyboard device, but the Newton showed that it was actually easier to take plain text notes on a PDA with a pen than with a laptop. Even some simple diagrams embedded in the notes on the fly were possible, though equations and formulas for a physics lecture were not really an option. I used to regularly compose emails or get started on longer documents on the train between work and home. Most modern PDA's and other mobile devices are effectively useless for anything beyond the shortest data entry task such as setting an appointment or adding an address book entry.

    Instead of improving the performance and making these things the ultimate data input platforms, the introduction of the Palm devices doomed us to inferior technologies. Palm sacraficed good handwriting recognition, to reduce the computing burden and make it possible to reduce the cost of the devices by using less capable hardware. Although this was a brilliant marketing choice that killed the Newton, it also swept the PDA market at the time and overwhelmed any chance that the public would associate pen devices as the fantastic data input devices that they could easily have been.

    The almost universal dislike of the pen interface held by the public, in my opinion, can be squarely put on the shoulders of Palm. Now, virtually every PDA out there is designed to be a read-mostly device that people on the go can use to access their data when they can't get to their PC. Although that is a compelling use for such devices to a small market segment, it amounts to a complete abandonment of the market for devices that could have become the prefered data input method for many people.

    Going back to the note taking example, pen devices are quieter and less disruptive than using a laptop. Lots of people take pen and paper notes at business meetings, but feel that using a laptop to take notes is too disruptive. A good PDA like the Newton can work better than both. A laptop is hard to setup and has serious start up time, battery life / power supply issues and reliability issues. A good PDA kicks butt in these situtaions. Had the technology been developed much at all, I'm sure that the diagram and formula issues could have been handled. Now, we'll never know.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  52. The Linux PDA vendors just don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Dump Trolltech's Qtopia and Java. When are the PDA vendors going to understand that I don't want either of them. What I want is a Linux PDA with:
    • X-Windows (for local and remote $DISPLAY)
    • CPU with floating point (maybe a Transmeta?)
    • 802.11b
    Basically what I want is a miniature desktop that fits in my pocket. Heck, if I could run X11 just fine on a 25 MHz 68030 Sun 3/80 then it should scream on a 400 MHz RISC chip!

    At the last Linux World Expo in SF I asked an AMD rep about the Alchemy chip, unfortunately it is integer only and has no floating point. Come on, it is the year 2003 we have 0.13u technology, how much die space would a floating point engine take? I don't understand why embedded chip makers don't include it by default and I yes used to work at a fabless chip company so I know the issues. It is just ridiculous. Technology advances are supposed to make things easier. Floating point would be real nice because it would allow a whole range of scientific applications that are a pain to do with fixed point.

    Also with an X-Server, porting any UNIX app would now be a breeze, no futzing with Trolltech's proprietary Qt (yes I know Qt is GPL and if you don't understand why this is an issue then you are clueless about the embedded business world).

    I am really sad about the sorry Linux PDA state of affairs. All the PDA vendors are too busy making clones of each others design (the Zazarus), a design I might add that the public has voted it doesn't want (buy not buying it), that they have stopped asking the customer what they truely want.
  53. Imagine... by cerenyx · · Score: 1

    A beowulf cluster of those ;)

  54. Re:What I don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    toynbee idea
    in movie 2001
    resurrect dead
    on planet jupiter