CCAGW Misreads Mass. Policy, Open Standards Generally
mhrivnak writes "The Council for
Citizens Against Government Waste made this press
release blasting the Massachusetts policy decision to move to Open Source. They explain why Linux is a 'monopoly,' how this policy is
'socialist' and why 'The old Soviet Union could not have done this any better.' The CCAGW has been previously informed about the benefits of open source software in
government. Tell them what you think!" The CCAGW is at least not completely one-dimensional; the group
is also opposed to mandatory embedded
snoopware.
Maybe they don't realize that conventional
closed-source software
has
big costs worth avoiding.
Socialism is just a red herring. ...or maybe that's Communism.
:-)
Oh crap, now I'm confusing Clue quotes... heh
All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
I didn't know you could have a state-imposed monopoly on free stuff. I wonder who funds this group...
Do we have to have the Soviet Russia jokes in the articles as well now?
"She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
"Yet while the software itself is free, the cost to maintain and upgrade it can become very expensive"
Yeah - good thing they didn't have to FIRST pay for the software, and THEN have to pay to upgrade and maintain it. Sheesh. Microsoft would never make you do that...
My sig left me for a younger user id.
I would also like to point out that the CCAGW was not criticizing the value of using open-source open-source itself, but rather the decision to exclude all other competitors in the bidding process.
Really? Did they say Microsoft was not allowed to bid on providing open-source software?
Anyone heard of MIT?
Choose yer poison: Prophets or Profits