Slashdot Mirror


Wind River Announces It Likes Linux After All

onecrazyfoo writes "Wind River is going to start supporting Linux in the embedded market. Pretty big news from the largest company in the embedded tools market. What makes it even more interesting is the fact that they have been very anti-Linux and outspoken about it in the past. You can read more about their announcement at LinuxDevices.com." I'm guessing this has come about because of recent changes in the company.

22 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. Well well well... by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Funny
    ....look who came crawling back.

    Somebody direct these guys to the "Supplicants" door. =)

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Well well well... by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's still surprising that it's Wind River -- these guys were *hardcore* anti-Linux anti-GPL folk not two years ago.

      I had a phone interview with them Back In The Day (2000 or 2001) for a release manager position, and we got to talking about how I'd be a sysadmin and specialized in the area. They asked me what platform I was most comfortable with, and when I mentioned Linux I got a rather haughty answer (along the lines of "Well, what *real* platforms?").

      Anyhow, you're right. And that's the beauty of the GPL -- it lets people change their minds when it becomes clear they can't fight the future. Still, you gotta admit, it'd be satisfying to make these folks grovel a little bit...

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:Well well well... by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "it lets people change their minds when it becomes clear they can't fight the future."

      Can't fight the future, or did Linux finally reach maturity? There's a big difference between fighting it kicking and screaming and simply not being able to use it because there's things it wasn't able to do.

      Don't assume that everybody who avoids Linux is an idiot.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Well well well... by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only thing that really hasn't been mature on Linux until fairly recently is the desktop. All your compilation tools (and OS sandbox/emulator enviroments) have been quite solid and stable for some time now.

  2. Wow by Cat_Byte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doing a 180 degree turn that fast has to be hard on the body. It's hard on the hairline when under the sheets too.

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  3. For those who don't RTFA.... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Found a link off the main article showcasing products embedded with Linux and actually shipping.

  4. No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Linux is stable even when a telnet to root is posted on slashdot as the 2nd post two stories in a row...

    Click here to get Instant Root

  5. Pfft by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They're just doing like LynuxWorks former Lynx with their Blue Cat Linux. I have a strong suspicion that WindRiver just wants to profit from some of the Linux hype, given that, apart from the price, quite frankly, their OS and tool suites are just way better than any embedded Linux suite I've ever seen/worked on/worked with.

    It's just another company trying to jump on the Linux bandwagon. Nothing to see here folks ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Pfft by El · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Last time I checked, the Wind River toolchain I was using (Tornado) was built on top of gcc and gdb. So they added a GUI wrapper to it -- so what? It's still THE SAME tool chain you get for free with any embedded Linux!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  6. better developer tools by a+no+n+y+man+123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hopefully this will mean better developer tools for embedded Linux in the future.

    This is not enough.

  7. Woo Hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fuckin' A, Linux rocks -- Wasup Wind River! That's right. Bitch, make me a sammich.

  8. We should *not* consider this a good thing... by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the comments so far, I will presume most Slashdotters have no experience with WindRiver.

    Exercising great restraint to avoid writing anything they would likely sue me for (such as a factual tale of my experience dealing with them for over two years), I would just like to point out that we should not, in any way, consider this "good" news.

    Aside from their "quality" tools (the fixing of which I can thank for giving me a reason to learn Tcl), expect to hear about a GPL violation within a few weeks. And if they handle that accusation like they handle their customers' bug reports, well, good ol' Darl may start sounding fairly reasonable to deal with.

    1. Re:We should *not* consider this a good thing... by sasami · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Aside from their "quality" tools (the fixing of which I can thank for giving me a reason to learn Tcl)

      You too, huh?

      I guess every VxWorks shop gets to have this lovely learning experience.

      ---
      Dum de dum.

      --
      Freedom is not the license to do what we like, it is the power to do what we ought.
  9. FreeBSD by holzp · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Fine, leave me for that flavor of the month! But dont come crawling back with your uptime goes down!" - FreeBSD

  10. Formerly with FreeBSD Wind river? by agent+dero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is an actual question, wasn't Wind River one of the major contributors to the fantastic development work done on FreeBSD?

    If so, how could this be _bad_ for linux in any way shape or form? Even if you don't like the company, linux-heads should wake up and realize, any company that's investing in linux and open source is GOOD, look how far FreeBSD has come from 386/BSD and FreeBSD 2.x

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
    1. Re:Formerly with FreeBSD Wind river? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is an actual question, wasn't Wind River one of the major contributors to the fantastic development work done on FreeBSD?

      Short version, no.

      Longer version: When BSDi fell on hard times around 4/2001, it was sold to Wind River. Many FreeBSD developers made the move. Shortly thereafter many major FreeBSD developers bailed to Apple. The vibe from the higher-ups was that BSD/OS was the "real" product at Wind River.

      Wind River are leeches. Don't expect them to contribute much, if anything.

  11. but, host tools? by cycle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whenever I'm building something on VxWorks, I'm mainly cursing about having to work from a Win or Sun machine. No Tornado for Linux. I would be really, really pleased if they would just release a host-tools-suite for Linux. That would make building stuff for VxWorks a much more pleasant experience. Jumping straight to "embedded linux" support sounds a little like jumping the gun, actually. They've spent 20 years developing VxWorks, it seems to me the most natural and useful Linux support would be to release a Linux-native development kit for it.

    1. Re:but, host tools? by k8to · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Back when I was at Windriver, me and another guy over in tech support tried to get Tornado over to Linux, but while we were attempting it, management was deciding to deprecate the other UNIX builds and was busy creating dependencies on the registry and MFC. At the time X libs weren't generally reentrant which was a blocker.

      We got sidetracked and the build stagnated and we never did that final 20%. It would have been so easy with just one person doing it full time. ..

      --
      -josh
  12. Going the way of Sun? by Brett+Glass · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sun did a similar thing: it embraced Linux, even though doing so was to feed and support something which was cannibalizing its core business. It is now regretting that decision. Will Wind River? Alas, I suspect so. Wind River has nothing to gain by supporting Linux.

    1. Re:Going the way of Sun? by PeteABastard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps they both also have a lot to lose by ignoring Linux. Linux seems to be a disruptive technology, perhaps thier best bet is to build a new core business around Linux, rather than to hang onto their old core business till it is totally eaten.

      Neither Sun nor Wind River were keen to embrace Linux in the past. Perhaps their change of heart is a sign that they see no other choice. It would not be surprising that they regret a decision they feel they were forced into.

      Peter

  13. Anti-Linux stance? by k8to · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe I didn't read the right articles, but I saw some belief that the GPL kernel might not mix well with the embedded world, and a perception of Linux being embraced by competitors, which caused them to try the other route: BSD.

    I didn't see any kind of "Linux is no good" message coming from WRS. Maybe I missed some clueless sales-drone speeches?

    The people you see making the pro-linux statements today: especially Fiddler, were making similar noises around the time I left, back in 1999. The attitude hasn't fundamentally changed, they just tried other avenues and they didn't work.

    WRS has long had an idiology that the runtime is not the important piece, but that the tools are where the major development value is. This stems from the origin of the company as a tools provider for VRTX. As a result, they've supported multiple runtimes over the course of the company, at times runtimes provided by alternate vendors. Thus, the Linux thing isn't new.

    What might be new is that the general open source movement is providing more and more sophisticated developer tools for free, such that their custom-packaging of GCC and gui project manager/debugger/etc aren't worth the boatload of cash they're used to charging for it.

    --
    -josh
  14. Not surprised by gnalre · · Score: 3, Informative

    Considering the prices for a vxworks seat I am not surprised. I am sure embedded linux at the low end has been killing them for a couple of years now.
    They also changed there strategy and there "crown jewels". The vxworks source code suddenly became cheaper.

    However there is a lot more to embedded development than just buying a package and putting it on. The things vxworks does do well is it provide a very configurable hardware layer which makes moving to new hardware relatively easy. Also some of there visulation tools such as windview are very good(Oh I wish there was something similar for windows) which allows you to sort out bottle necks.

    However you do pay through the nose for this (and there new licensing model has made it very expensive) and for cheap targets it is just not economic.

    --
    Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies