Slashdot Mirror
Wind River Announces It Likes Linux After All
onecrazyfoo writes "Wind River is going to start supporting Linux in the embedded market. Pretty big news from the largest company in the embedded tools market. What makes it even more interesting is the fact that they have been very anti-Linux and outspoken about it in the past. You can read more about their announcement at LinuxDevices.com." I'm guessing this has come about because of recent changes in the company.
Somebody direct these guys to the "Supplicants" door. =)
Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
Doing a 180 degree turn that fast has to be hard on the body. It's hard on the hairline when under the sheets too.
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
They're just doing like LynuxWorks former Lynx with their Blue Cat Linux. I have a strong suspicion that WindRiver just wants to profit from some of the Linux hype, given that, apart from the price, quite frankly, their OS and tool suites are just way better than any embedded Linux suite I've ever seen/worked on/worked with.
...
It's just another company trying to jump on the Linux bandwagon. Nothing to see here folks
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
Hopefully this will mean better developer tools for embedded Linux in the future.
This is not enough.
Fuckin' A, Linux rocks -- Wasup Wind River! That's right. Bitch, make me a sammich.
From the comments so far, I will presume most Slashdotters have no experience with WindRiver.
Exercising great restraint to avoid writing anything they would likely sue me for (such as a factual tale of my experience dealing with them for over two years), I would just like to point out that we should not, in any way, consider this "good" news.
Aside from their "quality" tools (the fixing of which I can thank for giving me a reason to learn Tcl), expect to hear about a GPL violation within a few weeks. And if they handle that accusation like they handle their customers' bug reports, well, good ol' Darl may start sounding fairly reasonable to deal with.
"Fine, leave me for that flavor of the month! But dont come crawling back with your uptime goes down!" - FreeBSD
This is an actual question, wasn't Wind River one of the major contributors to the fantastic development work done on FreeBSD?
Short version, no.
Longer version: When BSDi fell on hard times around 4/2001, it was sold to Wind River. Many FreeBSD developers made the move. Shortly thereafter many major FreeBSD developers bailed to Apple. The vibe from the higher-ups was that BSD/OS was the "real" product at Wind River.
Wind River are leeches. Don't expect them to contribute much, if anything.
Perhaps they both also have a lot to lose by ignoring Linux. Linux seems to be a disruptive technology, perhaps thier best bet is to build a new core business around Linux, rather than to hang onto their old core business till it is totally eaten.
Neither Sun nor Wind River were keen to embrace Linux in the past. Perhaps their change of heart is a sign that they see no other choice. It would not be surprising that they regret a decision they feel they were forced into.
Peter
Maybe I didn't read the right articles, but I saw some belief that the GPL kernel might not mix well with the embedded world, and a perception of Linux being embraced by competitors, which caused them to try the other route: BSD.
I didn't see any kind of "Linux is no good" message coming from WRS. Maybe I missed some clueless sales-drone speeches?
The people you see making the pro-linux statements today: especially Fiddler, were making similar noises around the time I left, back in 1999. The attitude hasn't fundamentally changed, they just tried other avenues and they didn't work.
WRS has long had an idiology that the runtime is not the important piece, but that the tools are where the major development value is. This stems from the origin of the company as a tools provider for VRTX. As a result, they've supported multiple runtimes over the course of the company, at times runtimes provided by alternate vendors. Thus, the Linux thing isn't new.
What might be new is that the general open source movement is providing more and more sophisticated developer tools for free, such that their custom-packaging of GCC and gui project manager/debugger/etc aren't worth the boatload of cash they're used to charging for it.
-josh