Slashdot Mirror


Earthstation 5 Claimed to be Malware

Rob from RPI writes "You may remember the announcement about a company, or program, or both called Earthstation 5 who recently 'Declared War' on the MPAA. Well guess what? Turns out that it's got code in it that allows anyone to delete any file on your computer. I suggest that you un-install as soon as possible!"

84 of 548 comments (clear)

  1. Geocites eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    Because the link is on geocities it's sure to be /.'d in 23 milliseconds. Here is a mirror I put up with the bin and src.
    Don't trust code from sources you don't know. I only provide these for the inevitable geocities /.ing

  2. Not surprising by aacool · · Score: 3, Funny
    This isnt surprising - the slashdot rage/paranoia/humor when Earthstation 5 was announced was palpable.


    Just goes to show you can't trust anyone but the RIAA for f'air and balanced info-warfare:)

    1. Re:Not surprising by chemmathguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      New tv show,

      Queer Eye for the Straight GUI

  3. Stupid stupid people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whats worse the RIAA/MPAA or people trying to get on our good sides then backstabbing us?

    1. Re:Stupid stupid people. by hobbespatch · · Score: 2, Funny

      From their website... (quote) Our group is made up of many people, Jordanians, Palestinians, Indians, Americans, Russians and Israelis. Some of us are Jewish, some Christians, some Hindus and other of us are Muslim. Believe it or not, we all love and respect each other. (/quote) Yesh, now we know that was too good to be true.

      --
      Still Mud? Try www.phoenixmud.org!
    2. Re:Stupid stupid people. by dcphoenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you know what Sun-Tsu said about knowing yourself and your enemies ( he who knows both is assured a victory ).

      In a computer's case, it's knowing as much about the program you're about to install as you can and monitoring your computer to see what's going on with it. That way, malware stands a smaller chance of screwing with your system.

  4. This is absolutely shocking. by Ygorl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really, I mean it. From looking at their web site one would have thought they were totally legitimate!

  5. Just what the MPAA wants... by Kedisar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they can delete all those movies from your hard disk!

    1. Re:Just what the MPAA wants... by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or maybe this is just a ploy by the RIAA/MPAA to get people to uninstall the software. I realize that code is provided and this is probably legit, but if they see that a "scare" of this type succeeds in getting people to stop using ES5, maybe they'll try something similar with Kazaa, but fake.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  6. I don't have to uninstall... by BlackBolt · · Score: 3, Funny

    It deleted itself.

  7. Well yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A P2P service that ACTIVELY PROMOTES piracy? It sounded too good to be true, and it was. All of this wonderful information from some schmoe with an email @yahoo.com? This whole deal is shady, no matter how you look at it.

    1. Re:Well yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The person who posted this advisory is definitely not a Joe Schmoe.

      This is Random Nut. THE Random Nut. You may have heard of him? No? Does KaZaA Lite K++ ring any bells at all? That's him. He knows what he's talking about. If you don't, try the exploit for yourself. Works as he says it does. Or decompile ES5 on a sacrificial machine.

      Warning: ES5 is very obviously a crock of shit and I've been saying so since release; alarm bells were ringing for me, frankly, as soon as I saw the website, especially the amusing comments (I'd link, but it's Flash) about Freenet, which is anonymous - ES5's "anonymity"? Well, you can download using overloaded, possibly monitored public web proxies. Streaming movies? From a Dutch web server via mms. Free porn? Thumbnail pages. Notice, though, no special features regarding music. Odd, that. Odd, isn't it?

      The alarm bells rang loudly enough for me that when I tried it out, I tried it out on a sacrificial machine. About thirty minutes later I dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda'd the machine from a LiveCD - I'd seen enough.

      I'll say again now what I said then, only with the hunches of the K++ creator backing it up as well as my own hunches: EarthStation5 is probably an RIAA-linked sting operation.

      Plus, it doesn't even fucking work. :)

  8. Earth Station 5 - legalese by Stalyx · · Score: 5, Funny

    And in other news when Reuter's contacted Earth Station 5's lead programmer, he had apparently mumbled under his breath.. "its not a bug damnit!, it's a feature"

    1. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would tend to agree. The odds of a programmer 'accidently' adding working code capable of deleting an end user's files or participating in a DDoS is about as likely as a programmer 'accidently' having sex with a pretty woman. It can happen, but it takes a LOT of work and planning on the part of the programmer (and wasn't an accident.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by MegaFur · · Score: 2, Funny
      The odds of a programmer 'accidently' adding working code capable of deleting an end user's files or participating in a DDoS is about as likely as a programmer 'accidently' having sex with a pretty woman.

      Well gee, darn, there goes that fantasy...

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
  9. Tinfoil alarm! by sebi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wouldn't that be just the cleverest act of terrorism you can think of? Bait the "foreign devils" with all you hate about them and then, BAM!, nuke millions of computers in an instant. Takes more preparation to get off the ground than your garden variety virus or worm but the pay-off is much greater, isn't it? And if I was living in Palestine threat of legal action by some American interest group would be the least of my worries.

    1. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I realize that perhaps, to many of you, computers and the Internet is Life Itself. However, a massive computer mixup is NOT a disaster on the scale of WTC or some other event causing major casualties.

      I just get annoyed when I hear a computer attack referred to as an effective terrorist strategy. I certainly could survive if my computer didn't turn on today; no terror here, just kind of disappointment. Perhaps something like this could be called a "bummer. oh well" attack.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by skarmor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      realize that perhaps, to many of you, computers and the Internet is Life Itself. However, a massive computer mixup is NOT a disaster on the scale of WTC or some other event causing major casualties. I just get annoyed when I hear a computer attack referred to as an effective terrorist strategy. I certainly could survive if my computer didn't turn on today; no terror here, just kind of disappointment. Perhaps something like this could be called a "bummer. oh well" attack.

      Nobody really cares if you can turn your computer on. However, a carefully planned attack on financial institutions/networks, military networks and other government systems could be quite effective. This is why said institutions are fanatical about security (or at least they should be).

    3. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by LizardKing · · Score: 4, Informative

      Please check your history before you post. The Palestinians did not come into existence until 16 years after the British handed over 1/3 of what the UN resolution required to form present-day Israel.

      That's either amazing ignorance you've got there, or just the most blatant bit of lying I've seen on Slashdot for days. The "protectorate" of Palestine existed between the two world wars, and was effectively a colony of the British Empire. Jewish immigration increased dramatically during this period, a result of increased interest in Zionism, itself largely a result of anti-Jewish activity in Europe.

      Palestine may not have been an independent nation state, but the Palestinian people had existed as a distinct race since biblical times when the Semitic tribes split along religious grounds. Remember that Jews and Palestinians are both Semitic races.

      Israel was created following the even bigger influx of Jewsih refugees after the Second World War. Many of these refugees brought bitter memories of the concenration camps with them, and a willingness to use force to gain a nation state. The British were unable to control the situation, having been effectively bankrupted by the war, and eventually pulled out after increased bombings of their official buildings, etc. The result was bloodshed, as the Jewish militias ehnically cleansed large parts of Palestine. Pretty ironic considering the background to the Jewish desire for a nation state.

      Chris

    4. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, if by "ethnically cleansed" you meant "watched the Palestinians get out of the way, then defended their homes as the armies of every surrounding Arab state rushed in to kill off the Jews."

      The Arabs living in the former British protectorate of Palestine basically decided in '48 that they'd just head out for a little bit, let their cousins next door clear the Jews out, and create an Arab state. They didn't bet on the Israelis (a) being able to leave behind their self-destructive infighting and (b) kicking the Jordanians', Egyptians' and Syrians' collective asses.

      That's what makes the "refugee camps" such a joke, albeit a sad one. These people were voluntary refugees. The Israeli Jews didn't run away, they defended their homes. The Palestinians could have done the same, but they didn't. Case closed. When it became clear Israel wasn't going away, the rest of the Arab world should have accepted the Palestinians into their societies rather than keeping them in camps for 55 years. Their failure to do the same, and subsequent usage of the Palestinians for political purposes is an indictment on them.

    5. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by thales · · Score: 2, Informative

      Palestine may not have been an independent nation state, but the Palestinian people had existed as a distinct race since biblical times when the Semitic tribes split along religious grounds. Remember that Jews and Palestinians are both Semitic races.

      ROFLMAO,

      The Palestinian "race" started as a mixture of ancestral Jews who converted to Christanity, Hellenistic Greeks who converted to Christanity, and smaller ammounts of assorted semites who converted to Christanity during the later stages of the Roman Empire. The Arabic Conquest added the Arab language and Arab Genes to the mix, and in most cases a conversion to Islam, though there remains a fairly large percentage of Palestinians who are Christians. Palestinians are an ethnic subgroup of the arab culture, NOT a race.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    6. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by X-rated+Ouroboros · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because you just know that a well organized technologically sophisticated terrorist cell would target the average user's access to pr0n. Hit us where it hurts, right? Infidel western devils just gotta have that pr0n.

      Perhaps it hasn't occurred to you, but computers run: air traffic control, banking, train switching, power production and distribution, water treatment purification and distribution, and pretty much all communication technology at this point.

      Having your computer not turn on might be an "aw bummer" moment, but when you realize it's because your power isn't on... unfortunately when you try to report the outage you realize your phone can't get tone. Cellphone doesn't get service either. "Ah, well." you grumble, and get in your car to go get something to eat. Traffic is a bitch, though, all the lights are either out (due to lack of power) or behaving erratically. You stop at the ATM to get some cash for some food, but it doesn't seem to be working. You figure you could just use debit or credit card, but when you finally find a restaurant that's open they explain that they can't seem to process the cards that day. You sigh and content yourself to what you can afford with the few dollars on you: a small bowl of soup and a big glass of water. The glass of water was a bad idea, though, since a valve mix-up at the threatment plant (after they lost computer control and coordination) has contaminated half the water in the city. Your last thought a few days later as the dehydration from the sickness finally steals your conciousness for the last time? It's not about missed e-mail.

      --
      Simple Machines in Higher Dimensions
  10. Good thing it wasn't email by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I had received this in my Inbox, I probably would have ignored it. It's interesting that I'm conditioned (brainwashed?) to ignore this stuff when it's in an email, but when I read it on /. I take it seriously.

    1. Re:Good thing it wasn't email by chicoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I had received this in my Inbox, I probably would have ignored it. It's interesting that I'm conditioned (brainwashed?) to ignore this stuff when it's in an email, but when I read it on /. I take it seriously.

      you must be new here.

      --
      ~the keyboard is mightier than the pen.
  11. Not surprising by skryche · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about the terrible GUI? That's the real crime here!

  12. they'll be more than glad... by fred+ugly · · Score: 5, Interesting
  13. Methods known by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, even if these guys are backstabbers (which apparently they are) they've disclosed their methods. And that should allow for a somewhat speedy recoding of a similar program that doesn't include screw_up_my_file(char* filename).

    Seriously, it was good theory, but they didn't have anything earthshattering that couldn't be replicated.

    I'll be watching for anything more that is discovered about motives. This seems to be the most curious and intriguing part of the story.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  14. Battlestations... by finalnight · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This mofos were the ones behind the summer DoS attacks on all the big BT sites, and now this. Gentlemen, start your cracking...

  15. Unconfirmed, as of yet. by caferace · · Score: 5, Informative
    This came across the FD list yesterday afternoon. Typically, an announcement of this type would elicit a fair amount of discussion. Usually at leat *one* other person would have confirmed it, or at least rebutted the claim.

    As of this writing, I haven't seen a single follow-up post.

    Is it true? I don't know, Is it a hoax? I don't know that either. It has more than a few caveats about using the exploit, that's for sure.

    What I do know is that that Geocities site with the exploit code will disappear bandwidth constrained faster than snot. :)

    1. Re:Unconfirmed, as of yet. by relyter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you may be right; this whole thing does seem a little fishy here. I myself used earthstation5 for a couple of days but deleted it after I got feed up with the slow transfer speeds and terrible interface. I have serious doubts that there are 15 million people (where do they get their numbers? - this is supposed to be completely decentralized program, with no severs)) that are simultaneously willing to put up with all the BS associated with this particular pile of stinking crap. I have since moved over to eMule and haven't been happier.
      In the event that this is legit, it would be used as fodder for the anti-P2P suits at the RIAA and MPAA to use to try and scare people from using P2P software. P2P software is far to integrated into our society (at least with the /.ers) to be shut down. The harder they work to shut them down, the more innovative the software will become to bypass their "blocks" (fake files, DoS on servers, etc.)

      The premise for E5 is cool, but the execution is flawed, perhaps some developer would like to put together a program based on the same principals that does suck or hack your box.

      Just a thought...

    2. Re:Unconfirmed, as of yet. by mkoop73 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I downloaded es5us.exe from their download page just a few minutes ago and got a completely different build number. I tried the exploit code and all of the test cases failed. I'm not even sure where that beta URL came from. I've never used E5 before, so I can't test it on an older copy -- or even validate those versions exist.

  16. A complicated world by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wait a minute, I thought these guys were anti-MPAA and anti-RIAA, meaning they can only be powerful forces for good!

    Arggggghhhhh

    Binary world-view is breaking down as we speak...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  17. Earthstation 5 sounds like... by vudufixit · · Score: 4, Funny

    A bad UPN science fiction series.

  18. Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil alert by Badgerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tinfoil hat on . . .

    Let's say ES5 is an MPAA/RIAA front to discredit file sharing and harm filesharers.

    Now, apparently, ES5 is in Palestine.

    What better way to do "double damage" than to not only have a way to attack filesharers, but also to connect it to a location people associate with terrorism?

    OK, tinfoil hat off now.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
  19. If you use a computer by ruiner13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure everyone has at least seen one article where they tell you to NEVER install software from a company you've either never heard of, or don't trust. At this point, the internet has been around long enough that most people realize this, especially if you have data on your machine that is so important that you can't risk getting a virus or a trojan (such as this, apparently) on it. Live by the internet, die by the internet. Just because someone claims to be against the RIAA doesn't make them your friend. Just because someone is against SCO, doesn't make them about free software rights. There are such things as self-serving deeds, even if they appear to be good gestures to all.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  20. Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rest assured, brothers, your files have not been deleted; they have been martyred and are currently being serviced by 72 virgins.

    1. Re:Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by LittleGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rest assured, brothers, your files have not been deleted; they have been martyred and are currently being serviced by 72 virgins.

      So, the standard Tech Support staff?

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  21. Also look out for these P2P programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Deep Space 9
    Babylon 5
    The Dagobah System

  22. now I know why my computer has been complaining by dnotj · · Score: 2, Funny

    About a missing file: /home/dnotj/.wine/fake_windows/boot.ini

    --
    No more Micro$oft bashing from me. Its like bashing at the special olympics.
  23. Not a buffer overflow? by Durzel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm curious - how can it be determined without the benefit of source code for ES5 that the exploit isn't just a horrendous oversight instead of a malicious pre-meditated function of the software?

    If it is malicious it seems odd that they would make it possible for ANYONE to delete someone elses files through crafted search strings, thus significantly increasing the chance of their nefarious plans being uncovered.

    If it were me, and I was secretly working for the RIAA, I'd just code in a simple client/server protocol that the RIAA could use to delete people's files, entirely seperate from the normal operation of the program itself. This would be much harder to identify as malicious code.

    Sorry, but this just looks to me like a bad "failure to chroot()" bug and not the big conspiracy theory its purported to be...

    1. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by scambaiter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, the conclusion simply says that they dont know what the use for some special "delete file" command could be and add the MPAA/RIAA story as a theory.

      I dont think that its simply something like a missing chroot() bug, i cant think of any good reason why you would have "delete file" command implemented in a P2P client... Fellow slashdotters, anyone got an idea why one would implement this?

      --
      sick of sigs... *sigh*
    2. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm curious - how can it be determined without the benefit of source code for ES5 that the exploit isn't just a horrendous oversight instead of a malicious pre-meditated function of the software?"

      Even in assembler its not too hard to see when an operation is a bug resulting from jumping to a bit
      of code when some unexpected events coincide and jumping to the same bit of code when a SPECIFIC packet arrives.

    3. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by krumms · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm curious - how can it be determined without the benefit of source code for ES5 that the exploit isn't just a horrendous oversight instead of a malicious pre-meditated function of the software?

      Well, I'm curious - what more proof do you want?

      The FD post made it clear that a particular function of the ES5 software ("0Ch, sub-function 07h") caused the behaviour. That's a completely separate function that seems to have the sole purpose of deleting files remotely. The likelyhood of such code ever getting near the network/command interpreter accidentally is rather slim.

      Maybe if it occurred as part of another function I could believe it was accidental, but not when it's on its own. If that makes any sense ;)

      While I too disagree with the 'conspiracy theory' story behind all this, it seems to me from the information given that they've got blood on their hands.

    4. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by dtrent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having worked at a small software company, I'll speculate.

      This could have been added as an "internal" feature and forgotten about it. It could have been added by one un-professional programmer, unbeknownst to the rest of the group. It could be in there on purpose, and the team is naive enough to believe it'll never get abused. It could be in there on purpose because they want it there and they don't care about the ramifications. And finally, it could be there because they have plans to use it some day to cause havoc.

      My bet is the on one of the first two, but I wouldn't rule out any of them.

    5. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by cduffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're obviously not a coder.

      A buffer overflow involves, guess it, overflowing a buffer. Putting a different byte in the command field of a packet -- without any changes in length -- is absolutely not a buffer overflow.

      Jumping to a delete routine based on what's in that byte is not a "deliberate mistake".

      As nice as it would be to do a bit of wishful thinking -- as a professional coder, I can state this behaviour was clearly intentionally added.

    6. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by godzillion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Including a remote file deletion in the protocol is only part of the problem, though, and that's obviously intentional. The really dangerous part is that you can tell a remote computer to delete a file on a relative path including "../../../", wiping out (unshared) files from the arbitrary directories on the machine.

      Sounds to me more like somebody forgot to check for "." at the beginning of the deletion path. If you can delete arbitrary files in this way, it would seem likely that you can retrieve arbitrary (not intentionally shared) files, too.

  24. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um.... $2.00 doesn't cover the hardware costs of producing a professional cd. If your requests are unresonable, don't be surprised when they're not met.

    On the other side of that, $16-20 is unreasonable. $10 would be fair, I think. Considering the hours spent in the studio recording, AFM scale per musician per song being $50 (and that's for low grade musicians), the cost of a decent engineer, cost of using a decent studio (that's not cheap), mastering costs... Then you've got to either spend $$ on an expensive fast cd dup'er, or pay someone to burn 10,000 cd's in a week, artwork for the j-page, printing of the j-page, cd cases, shringwrapping, a UPC, distribution, etc....

    Do you honestly think all of that can be done for $2.00 per? Get real.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  25. IT'S A TRAP! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It sounds interesting - any /.ers try the exploit out yet?

    The first place I heard about E5 was on Slashdot, in a sig - I thought about trying it out, but something didn't seem quite right.

    Too much flash and cash on the website, and sweeping claims that hadn't made it elsewhere turned me off.

    I'm thinking it's the same 'spidey sense' that goes off when I get an email with an evil attachment.

  26. Verify the presence of malware by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny
    $ grep "rm" ~/W4R3Z/es5
    Binary file ~/W4R3Z/es5 matches
    $
    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  27. Anagram conspiracy theory by mblase · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did you know that you can rearrange the letters of "EARTHSTATION FIVE" to spell "RIAA VOTES IN THEFT"?

    They're behind the whole thing, I'm telling you.

    1. Re:Anagram conspiracy theory by bpd1069 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you know that you can rearrange the letters of "EARTHSTATION FIVE" to spell "RIAA VOTES IN THEFT"?


      I also found "SEVENTH TIT OF RIAA"

      We all know the RIAA is a bitch, but this just proves it...

      --
      --
  28. Heres the trojan code by ghost1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Link to Zeropaid discussion with the actual code http://www.zeropaid.com/news/articles/auto/1002200 3i.php

  29. ...or a brilliant MPAA/RIAA tactic by LilJC · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Release excellent mother-of-them-all P2P software under guise of legitimate software
    2. Once everyone has it, delete all pirated files
    3. Profit!

    I half wish they'd actually do that - maybe it would incite a full boycott. Though I am happy with the understanding that their sales are declining already.

    --

    The only thing more dangerous than a file named -rf is renaming it -rf\ /
  30. Whois by Xerxes2695 · · Score: 2, Funny

    www.es5.com is regestered to (get this)

    Earthstationv Ltd., A Palestinian Corporation
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin (PS)

    Rfugee camp? Palestine? Unless they lied on the registration I doubt this is RIAA.

  31. Re:Now tell the bastards what you think! by nucal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This WHOIS just looks incredibly fake to me ...

    earthstation5.com Back-order this name

    Domain EARTHSTATION5.COM

    Date Registered: 2/26/2002
    Date Modified: 6/13/2002
    Expiry Date: 2005-2-26
    DNS1: ns1.earthstationv.com
    DNS2: ns2.earthstationv.com
    Registrant

    Earthstationv Ltd, A Palestinian Corporation
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin (PS)
    NONE

    Administrative Contact

    EarthstationV Ltd., A Palestinian Corporation
    Mr Domain Administrator
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin (PS)
    NONE
    067351065
    67351065
    ras@earthstationv.com
    Technical Contact
    EarthstationV Ltd., A Palestinian Corporation
    Mr Domain Administrator
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin (PS)
    NONE
    067351065
    67351065
    ras@earthstationv.com
    Registrar: NameScout.com

  32. What's the big deal? by Giant+Ape+Skeleton · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's not a bug, it's a *feature* !

    ;-)

    --
    The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
  33. It could happen with any closed source software.. by pirhana · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a good example which shows again and again that any closed source is inherently not trustable. When you are installing a proprietory software, you are basically trusting them not to screw you up or put any back door. Nobody has any guaranty that windows or any other closed source software is free of this issue. Safe bet is to stick with open source software exclusively.

  34. Finally, something I know about... by wingnut2600 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I heard about this yesterday from a posting by Random Nut (the individual that discovered this exploit as well as earlier security holes in Kazaa) on Zeropaid.com (forum link: http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=15259 ).

    The security exploit is being tested by members of the p2p community and has been shown to be a viable exploit (forum link: http://www.p2pforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=20323#203 23)

    The operators of ESV have been slow to directly answer questions regarding this exploit:(http://forums2.es5.com/index.php?act=ST&f =40&t=5645&s=1ec6bf29bb73061ed185cbc3018f04b8) . Registration required to view forums, but it is worth it! The ESV forums are interesting since they make allegations of other site's involvement with the RIAA, MPAA, etc. yet have included a questionable exploit in their own software. These forums are rife with rhetoric and double-talk of Orwellian proportions.

  35. Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Funny

    People need to stop trashing Earthstation 5. It's a fantastic program, and does exactly as advertised. Plus, it seems to have built-in compression software -- my free disk space has been steadily increasing ever since I installed it!

    1. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by Broodje · · Score: 2, Informative

      clicky for instance. ok ok, $9.95/mo :)

  36. Failsafe hypothesis [and a another foil hat :)] by DingoBueno · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scenario 1:
    Maybe this is not malicious. Possibly a way to protect people in the event that something bad happens, like all this hyped anonymity and encryption turns out to be trivial to crack. ES5 may have already developed a worm that spreads and exploits this function to delete all shared files on the network, which may be in the users' best interests.

    Scenario 2 (aka Conspiracy theory 1):
    Orrin Hatch is making good on his promise to destroy the PCs of filesharers around the world, while placing the blame on Palestine.

    I like the #2 better, but you decide for yourself :)

    Later...

    --
    ascii art
  37. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're too right about the price staying where it is. And having been a recording artist, I can say that a run of a brick of CD's (1000) costs about $4 per when you want it to be nice and professional. That's just the material costs. Also, there's a $0.015 (unfairly low.. they haven't had a raise since the 50's) per song fee to songwriters, the artist generally get's close to $1 per cd sold (that's fair I think). The rest goes to the label for all their "hard work."

    For expected gold-platinum cd's, $8 is probably fair, but for those that are only selling 1k-10k, that might be a stretch. Of course, you could argue that they should be selling for that, maybe breaking even, just to get their music into the hands of the public, who will pay to see them live.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  38. punish them... by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...with their next bandwidth bill:

    $ wget -O /dev/null http://download.es5.com/es5us.exe

  39. Re:Let's be logical about it by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stealing a book from a library == theft.

    Photocopying the same book ==copyright infringement != theft.

    Burning the book == damage.

    See how simple logic is when you're not trolling

  40. I was suspicious by techsoldaten · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was suspicious of this project from the beginning. The way they market their product, promising immediate access to copyrighted items, was just too rosy and would leave any company wide open for litigation. This passage in the announcement pretty much sums up my take on the whole affair:

    "The question then is 'why did they do it?' I'm sure they won't tell us, but here's a theory: They could be working for the RIAA, MPAA, or a similar organization. Once they have enough users on their ES5 network, they would start deleting all copyrighted files they own which their users are sharing. The users wouldn't know what hit them."

    Can anyone come up with a plausible scenario where a P2P company would release software that destroys a computer, if it is not connected somehow to these groups?

  41. Called it. by 72beetle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Told ya.

    -72

    --
    -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
  42. Could the MPAA / RIAA be behind this? by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forgive me for even thinking the unthinkable. But please indulge me for a moment. Consider the hypothetical possibility that one of the *AA evil twins might create, build a website for, and promote some "anti-*AA" software. Imagine that it is a trojan horse. You let it into the city gates. It seems to be what you think it is. But at night, out comes the invading army through a secret door.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:Could the MPAA / RIAA be behind this? by dbretton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I only wish it were, and I only wish the RIAA were to actually delete a file on my computer.
      That would place them in such an actionable position that I would probably have to beat back lawyers from my door with a broomstick.

      I am not a lawyer, but I would venture to guess that an act such as the RIAA using an application to delete files from my computer to violate several laws, at least in my state:
      unauthorized electronic trespass into a computer system
      criminal destruction of private electronic data
      et. al.

      I'm sure that there are a few federal laws violated as well.

      I would love to see it happen. I wouldn't mind retiring early, living off a fat MPAA/RIAA paycheck.

  43. No, It's DRM by tds67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's obviously just Digital Rights Management code!

  44. A bit tired of this argument... by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    While I agree with the principle behind this argument, this is like saying you'll never get behind the wheel of a car unless you bought all the parts yourself and built it yourself based on freely available plans.

    After all, there's probably a GPS tracking system, data recorders that records the times when you're over the speed limit, and other potentially privacy-compromising system hidden in any car you buy.

    Do you trust the drinking water coming through your pipes? What, you filter it first? OK, have you bothered to take the filter apart yourself to verify its components work as advertised or do you accept that government regulations will keep them from selling a defective product?

    Consider Joe Average. Give him an open source program--he has to trust that you personally went through the code and verified it's clean, or that a bunch of unknowns on the net verified it. He sure as hell isn't going to go through all the code and compile it himself. And do you yourself trust that C compiler? There's that theory about how the original C compiler could have a backdoor put in, and every subsequent C compiler or program compiled could have a backdoor built into it during compile time.

    In truth you can't trust ANYTHING you don't make yourself. But it's not practical to make everything yourself because of time constraints or inexperience, so at some point everyone has to put their trust in some system they didn't make themselves. And yes, sometimes that trust is violated, like tires that blow apart for no reason or the water is tainted with e-coli. But in the real world most people can't afford to distrust absolutely everything and still live a real life. Neither can most people who have a computer.

    Like I said, I agree with the principle. But this is the real world, and many personal, idealized principles just don't play into it.

    1. Re:A bit tired of this argument... by pirhana · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let me clarify my point. Have you ever heard of any back doors in any open source software ? very less(if at all any). Now, have you heard of any back doors in commercial softwares ? Many. Just compare the P2P applications itself. Many of the closed source ones were alleged to have spywayre, backdoors etc(Kazaa and now this one for example). Was there a single case of such incident in open source alternatives ? I dont think so. So my point is that, the chance to find a back door in an open source software is close to zero. But thats not the case in closed source ones. Untill and unless proven otherwise by incidents, this argument will remain valid. I will not say that open source software is panacea or anything like that . But they are inherently more OPEN and transparant. In closed source software , you are trusting a SINGLE company which is not a good idea IMHO.

  45. Re:Nice try, MPAA! by reverius · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought the MPAA -was- a terrorist outfit.

  46. Who would mod this as informative? by mckyj57 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are the people here history-challenged, or what? A bigger bunch of baloney has never been posted.

    There may have been a territory called "Palestine" for years, but there were no "Palestinians". There are Arabs happening to live in that territory.

    WRT the "ethnic cleansing", I note that no evidence is provided. That would indeed be hard, since there cannot be any as none occurred.

  47. Re:Now tell the bastards what you think! by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't get it, how can you fake the WHOIS registry? I thought there was some follow up needed?

    Man! All this time I've been putting my real name and address on like a sucker. Which is a pisser, b/c it really bothers me that people can look me up if they find something offensive on my website.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  48. ES5 is too shitty for this plan to succeed by heironymouscoward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I tried ES5 some time ago to see whether it worked or not.

    It was such junk that I uninstalled it without even managing to find a single thing, illegal, legal, whatever.

    If the application was designed to get a community and then hurt them, it is a real failure.

    What I suspect is that the people behind ES5 really are a bunch of half-mad Russian programmers paid by oil-quaffing Saudis, who actually believe that their application rocks. And they planned to get 15m users, then approach the highest bidder, advertisers or *AA, selling the captured market. The "encryption" stuff is just to make it impossible to reverse-engineer ES5 clients, and the backdoor is just there to up the ante for selling their shit to the *AA.

    A poor plan, horribly implemented.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  49. Re:Now tell the bastards what you think! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The *maintainer* of Earthstation V's domain record is fom Israel. I do not know what this signifies.

    To see this, go here and click on the mnt-by ("maintained by") link.

    person: Moshe Maimone
    address: 63 Saudia Gaon
    Hertzlya, Israel
    phone: +39247585
    nic-hdl: MM9905-RIPE
    mnt-by: SPEEDNET-MNT
    changed: Speednet@email.com 20030508
    source: RIPE

    person: Motti Oran
    address: 25 Hasivin Street
    Petach Tikva, Israel 49170
    phone: +039247585
    fax-no: +039247736
    mnt-by: SPEEDNET-MNT
    notify: speednet@email.com
    e-mail: motti@speed-net.com
    nic-hdl: MO2551-RIPE
    changed: speednet@email.com 20030105
    source: RIPE
  50. A bit off the topic but very interesting by freakyfreak2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anyone notice on the delete any file link that the next topic on that board was about the Half Life 2 source code and how it was actually leaked. http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/ 2003-October/011338.html Looks like microsoft's flaws are to blame

  51. Oh God not again... by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can someone please please PLEASE write a filter that excludes threads that mention the words "Israel" or "Palestine" more than once each?

    Here, guys, stop arguing. I'll make all of your arguments for you:

    Pro-Palestinian guy: Israel is guilty of $ATROCITY1, $ATROCITY2, and $ATROCITY3

    Pro-Israel guy: Surely you're not comparing things like $ATROCITY2 to $ATROCITY4, $ATROCITY5, and $ATROCITY6, which were committed by Palestinians

    Pro-Palestinian guy: Oh come on! $ATROCITY6 wasn't nearly as bad as $ATROCITY3! Besides, they only did it because of $ATROCITY3! If Israel had never committed $ATROCITY3 then the Palestinians wouldn't have had to have committed $ATROCITY6!

    Pro-Israel guy: but the Israels only committed $ATROCITY3 as a defensive measure because the Palestinians committed $ATROCITY7!

    This will continue for about 20 or so posts as both sides try to justify violence because of things that happened 30, 60, 100, or 5000 years ago; apparently in the middle east the moral high ground of a situation is inherited from your parents. I've really never understood that.

    Anyways, I've now said EVERY SINGLE THING every partisan in this argument has ever said and will ever say, so you can all just STFU.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:Oh God not again... by salesgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyways, I've now said EVERY SINGLE THING every partisan in this argument has ever said and will ever say, so you can all just STFU.

      Because of what the implecations of the actions 5000 years ago that let to the current state of injustice, future attrocities 9 and 11 will be committed in anticipation of attrocity 8. And the other side will preemptivly perform attrocity 13 to prevent numbers 9 and 10, but in doing so will actually guarantee that numbers 9 and 10 occur.

      Seriously: these people would do well to accept reality as it is, and start building their lives. Get rid of the leaders on both sides that are so hell bent on holding thier breath the longest. Exhale and get on with your lives. You only have so many years on earth, so why spend the rest of it fighting over things you have NO CONTROL OVER, DID NOT START AND REALISTICALLY CANNOT FINISH WITHOUT IT ENDING IN YET ANOTHER POMGROM? Neither side has the will or ability to kill off the other, and the world will not let that happen right now.

      --
      -- $G
  52. Use only Open Source! by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative

    This just goes to show that you can not trust closed proprietary code. It is pretty weird that these ES5 guys would come out the way they did with big mouths. Either they work for the RIAA/MPAA or they *wanted* to be a target. I think it is the first one. If you are going to share files, make sure that you

    1. Use open source applications only.
    2. Share files that you have the legal right to share.
    3. If you do share some illegal file, see 1.

    There are 1,000's of songs out there that can be legally shared, and there are tens of thousands of files/applications out there that can be legally shared. Share those and dump the RIAA/MPAA all together. There is a good Open Source P2P app out there called giFT. It can connect to OpenFT, Gnutella and Kazza (FastTrack). giFT

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  53. the internet state in palestine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    hey there,

    im an israeli.
    and to tell you the truth, i was a bit afraid to post any comments last time since i didnt want to get into the heat of the argument.

    i just wanted to reveal some details regarding the state of the internet in palestine in an objective manner since i belive the cassual slashdotter might have percieved it wrongfully.

    palestine is currently in a semi anarchistic state. which means that most of its people do not have an internet connection at their disposal.

    a few years back israel started to provide palestinians with internet services.
    we thought that it would do good to open their minds to other world perspectives and international media. we still have no clue regarding the outcome :)

    afaik isps are very limited in palestine and most internet infrastructure is used for academic and government purposes. all internet traffic from palestine passed through israel, im uncertain whether this is true to this day, you can easilly check it.
    so yes its our fault such things happen and so im terribly sorry that it is being put into bad use.

    i would highly doubt that internet is available at jenin. jenin is a refugee camp in which people are forced to live in sub conditions which means,
    its probably one of the last places to have internet in palestine. therefore, i would presume the whois is fake.

    if a palestinian indeed wrote that software he would either be:
    a. a student in one of the universities.
    b. an arab israeli (the 20% of israeli population that live within us in peace which the media never mentions a thing about).

    also, ras kabir is a fake name. it means
    "big head" which means, the man in charge or someone who likes to take care of business.

    and just to ensure you we were not the ones to write it :)

    the israeli p2p app is a hacked version of kazaa lite ;)
    (which is a hacked version of kazaa located at
    http://www.kazaa.co.il)
    although only a low percentage of israeli p2p users actually use it. and it doesnt encourage piracy like es5.

    thats pretty much it, im sorry if i hurt anyone
    if you have any questions feel free to ask,
    just take into mind that im not into starting any flame wars in the proccess.

  54. RIAA/MPAA "honeypot" by raresilk · · Score: 4, Informative
    When Slashdot initially ran the Earthstation V article, I posted a warning that this looked an awful lot like an RIAA/MPAA "honeypot" to me. Everybody ignored me, because they were too busy giving high-fives to Earthstation for bravely taking on the RIAA, etc. Now we learn that Earthstation has exactly the "feature" the Content Mafia would put in a honeypot - the ability to delete content off of your machine. I guess all of us (or at least some of us) are as gullible as the Content Mafia think we are.

    --
    No, no, no. This is not a sig.
  55. Bummer!! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ack, what could happen worse than a disaster like the WTC towers crashes terrorism?!? (intentionally bad grammar.) Computers control the world today, after all, if we had better computers, the terrorist never would have been able to sneak weapons on the airlines in the first place.

    While I'm aware than ES5 doesn't concern government or big business, it could have devistating effects IF it did. Think instead of a business instant messenger. That would be just peachy, so you're running the missle control program and just chillin' with your buds, and someone just deletes the trajectory file! If you were running a sane OS (defined as anything BUT Microjunk), the file would be in system memory, no problem. Of course you can understand the problems this would create on a microjunk platform!

    Missile386.exe has caused an illegal function and will be terminated, yeah, fun, real fun.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  56. On topic by edxwelch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the origional Earthstation slashdot story came out, it ws claimed that this software had more movies and software than any other p2p system and was more secure.
    I posted what was one of the few on topic posts, and asked if anyone had actually used this program and if it was any good.
    Some kind slashdotter responded that it was very buggy and already installed many viruses on his PC and on that note I gave it a wide berth.
    Meanwhile everyone else in the discussion was totally engrossed in the Isreali - Palestinian flamewar and seemingly forgot what the origonal story was about.
    The moral of this all is:
    Well, stay on topic and you might learn something, but then again, fuck it, a good flamewar is always fun too!