Slashdot Mirror


Axentra Rumba Server - Home Do-It-All Box

JigSaw writes "OSNews has an exclusive article on a new Linux-based server appliance product -- the first in the family -- the Axentra Rumba Server. The product is to be launched soon, but details of it have being leaked out already: The device has a mini ITX mobo, VIA C3 800 MHz CPU, 256 MB RAM, 40 GB hdd, USB 1.1, 2 LAN ports and in 1 WAN port (extra Wi-Fi USB device required). The device is useful as an Internet Gateway (DNS, IP filtering, Port forwarding, NAT firewall), as a network service (web server, file server, WebDAV, IMAP/SMTP, Samba, Content/Spam Filtering, photo album). It has an embedded web server so you can administer it via your web browser. It is compatible with Linux, Macs and Windows."

168 comments

  1. Cobalt Cube? by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it just me, or does this thing sound exactly like the Cobalt Cube from a few years back? It ran a modified Red Hat, was an "Internet appliance" turn-key box, and did all the fun router/web server/email server/file server stuff with just a simple interface.

    What's old is new again, I suppose.

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    1. Re:Cobalt Cube? by tgrasl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is very similar in idea to the cube but, as the article says, the cube was too expensive to really atract home users - and we can only hope that this box isn't. Although whether a home user really wants this kind of thing is another question

    2. Re:Cobalt Cube? by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it's from the HomeBase guys, OEOne, so they are keeping the same target market. I do like the "Best viewed with Mozilla" at the bottom, though.

    3. Re:Cobalt Cube? by zmooc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only was it too expensive, it was too early. Linux was little known with home users back then and ADSL and cable was a lot less common so it didn't really take of. Apart from that, there is market for all-in-one routers/firewall/* for SOHO-use nowadays and since this box is basicly that with a few extras, it'll have a lot easier time than the Cube.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    4. Re:Cobalt Cube? by spinlocked · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's similar, authough the qube is arguably more suited to file serving than this box, because it has a pair of mirrored disks and a SCSI controller to allow the addition of an external tape drive.

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
    5. Re:Cobalt Cube? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2, Insightful
      s it just me, or does this thing sound exactly like the Cobalt Cube from a few years back? It ran a modified Red Hat, was an "Internet appliance" turn-key box, and did all the fun router/web server/email server/file server stuff with just a simple interface.

      Ahh yes... I have one of those... My trusty Sun Cobalt Qube. I run three domains with it over my cable modem...The cpu utilization has never been over like 20% for any extended period. It is quite the little workhorse, at only 450 mhz...

      I fail to see how 850mhz is anything but overkill for an linux appliance doing the tasks specified. Then again, when I tell people the qube is only a 450, they get this...look on their face. Like they either don't believe me, or don't believe something that runs at ONLY 450 mhz can possibly get the job done. Perhaps going with a faster processor is simply for ease of marketing?
      --
      Who did what now?
    6. Re:Cobalt Cube? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Not only was it too expensive, it was too early. Linux was little known with home users back then [...]

      None of them are going to care what it runs, only whether or not it works.

    7. Re:Cobalt Cube? by rthille · · Score: 3, Informative

      450MHz is overkill? Heck, That's a P3 (or compatible) right? My Qube2 is just 250MHz Mips R4000 (compatible), and though it's running NetBSD (arguably less efficient than Linux, at least on i386), it's typically 95%+ idle, serving as a mail and web server (even running Zope).

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    8. Re:Cobalt Cube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The cpu utilization has never been over like 20% for any extended period.
      Probably because you're running "hobby" sites with extremely low traffic. I'm not sure it would "get the job done" on a big, or dynamic site.
    9. Re:Cobalt Cube? by yomegaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just found the VIA C3 800MHz on pricewatch for $34, I'm sure those guys get them for much less in quantity. Using something slower would cut approximately $0 from the price, so I don't see how it would make any sense to do so.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    10. Re:Cobalt Cube? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Well, since it is running linux, it may be possible to run a small game server off it as well. I'm not sure how well the VIA cpu will handle it, but since a dedicated server doesn't do any of the graphics processing, it may have a chance.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  2. "in 1 WAN port"? by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Informative

    First of all, the "in" seems extraneous? Secondly, doesn't "WAN" mean "WIDE Area Network", not "WIRELESS Area Network"? I thought the term for 802.x1 type stuff is "WLAN"? (Wireless Local Area Network)

    1. Re:"in 1 WAN port"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says right there there WLAN connectivity can be accomplished with an external module.

    2. Re:"in 1 WAN port"? by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

      SO where do I get a WLAN card with V.35 connector ?

    3. Re:"in 1 WAN port"? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Doesn't V.35 only go to one and a half or three megabits or something? That would be pretty useless. Maybe they mean that you're supposed to attach something to your internal ethernet network, like a wireless bridge, or wireless access point.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:"in 1 WAN port"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WAN port is your uplink, where you connect your cable/DSL.

    5. Re:"in 1 WAN port"? by steveha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sounds to me like the writer of that article messed up. This device is being marketed as a multi-purpose device, and one of the purposes is as a firewall. If it's intended for that, you would expect it to have a clearly-labeled uplink port. On my home firewall/router box, the uplink port is labeled "WAN".

      Maybe it can also serve as a wireless access point if you attach a USB WiFi adapter. But mentioning that right next to mentioning the extra Ethernet jack is just weird.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  3. Wait and See by Omega037 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am curios to see just how popular such a device is. I am not sure who the exact target would be. Anyone highly skilled or professional level could just build and setup their own with more stuff at a cheaper price. Those who don't have much computer skills will never hear of or have any need for this device. I guess if it is cheap enough so that someone would rather buy it then take the time to build one themselves, it could do well. My personal opinion is that it won't be priced low enough. They will sell a few, but not a ton.

    1. Re:Wait and See by GiMP · · Score: 1

      A lot of companies believe they get a better deal with pre-built, or (in this case) pre-configured computers. They have a good point. Regardless of how good your employees are, they can still make mistakes. Much more likely to make a mistake than a company like Axentra, and at least Anextra gives them a warranty.

      I saw this thing in TigerDirect and thought, "oh great, another netpliance". Then I turned the page. Machines like this aren't made for home users. I'd really like to know what this thing does that my Pentium 133 doesn't do.

      This is simply a toy for geek-wannabes who have too much money and too little skill. IMHO, of course.

    2. Re:Wait and See by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Or for companies who look for and buy anything that solves their problem, THEN look at the price. Unfortunately, that seems to be most companies.

    3. Re:Wait and See by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a geek-wannabe with more money than skill, you're probably right. Currently I'm running my home webserver on an old G4 with OS X client. I'd like to do more, i.e., run my own imap server, webdav, maybe a DNS (if I understood why I should run my own DNS server), but I'm at the limits of my current knowledge and skills. I've thought about upgrading to OS X server, as I understand it makes setting up those services a snap. This presents me with another alternative, and possibly a better choice. A lot will depend on price. OS X server can be had for as little as $499. The Panther version should be out soon. Will this thing go for under $500?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Wait and See by GiMP · · Score: 1

      TigerDirect is selling them for $499.99. see my post regarding this.

    5. Re:Wait and See by Hatta · · Score: 1

      If you want to learn, just throw debian on an old box and play with it. Get some linux books out of the library, Read the howtos. It's fun! Then you can take that $500 and spend it on your girlfriend.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  4. test server by Michael's+a+Jerk! · · Score: 1, Informative

    One is running Here so slashdot it please - it needs stress testing.

    --

    I'm not Seth.

    1. Re:Test Server by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

      heheh it worked for me :p but as you know it may not now

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
    2. Re:Test Server by visomo · · Score: 1

      a working test server linked on the article

      --
      Terrible office day. My secretary went sick, we lost a major contract and a little white dwarf turned me into a banana.
    3. Re:test server by mlrtime · · Score: 1

      I would guess that it is pretty hard to bring down any machine serving a 1k text only static page. You might stress test your BW before the server.

    4. Re:test server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while moderatly off topic, did anyone go to the rock climbing part of the page and look at the pictures? First of all, all the faces are positive, meaning that gravity is pushing you against the wall, which is so easy it doesn't even fall into the same grade as what most people consider rock climbing. And second of all it appears that it was a led group, but about half way down the picture page, there is a picture of the anchor. It looks like there is only one anchor point, around that tree, and it for sure isn't down far enough to clear the edge of the rock so that rope's chances of getting worn and breaking are increases like a million times. Noone that knows anything about climbing would ever do this to their gear. So what is my point? Just that if you are going to put up an experimental web server, you should know more about rock climbing. And that goes for everyone.

  5. GOOD! by IdleLay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most linux/*bsd buff can build one of these on any given sunday. But it is great to see a consumer oriented device targetted at home (mainly windows) users that offers what was once only available to geeks to the mass market... well I for one hope it takes off anyway.

    1. Re:GOOD! by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering the low cost of the software, wouldn't it be silly NOT to use a premade solution? It surprises me when some companies insist on writing their own software when there is a solution around, and when they don't when their needs are too custom.

      This type of stuff is what MS is really afraid of. People using OSS vs WinCE/ME/NT.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

  6. Personal server by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seems like a pretty cool little device. Maybe with appliances like these more people will start to get interested in hosting their own website on their DSL/Cable connection, or doing other "server" type stuff. I really dislike how the Internet today is seen as just a place to visit web pages. Maybe with a simple server appliance people will get the idea that they can publish stuff on the web and share stuff with their friends and family that way. They could even have it run things like a jabber server. Wouldn't that be cool? What this company would do if they were smart is automatically give everyone who buys one of these a dynamic DNS account, so your little server could have its own permanent address with no configuration necessary.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    1. Re:Personal server by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 2, Informative

      You better check your TOS. Such a thing will certainly violate 99.9% of all non business type accounts with internet service providers. The personal part is so you can serve stuff on your side of the firewall.

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
    2. Re:Personal server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Dunno about the US of A, but most UK ADSL providers (ADSL being the primary "broadband" here) seem to let you do what you want with your connection. For $38/month (Eclipse) I have 8 static IPs, absolutely no restrictions on bandwidth, ports, hosting, etc. The only think restricting me from putting up lots of servers is that I happen to have chosen the contended 512k/256k product, but that's not the only option.


      Maybe, then, this device would be popular in the UK. In my case, I prefer to build my own server out of an old (sub-300Mhz) PC. I really don't need anything better.

    3. Re:Personal server by Isbiten · · Score: 1

      You mean .Mac? :) Does all that, without having to run a server in your home, and possible get suspended for having a server.

      --
      I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    4. Re:Personal server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice Mac troll but unless I am mistaken you have to pay for .Mac now. Hosting at home is free and you have full control. I am not sure why you would compare .Mac with hosting yourself unless you are just a cheap Mac troll.

    5. Re:Personal server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, our cable modem TOS is never enforced.

      I've run a small website off of my cable modem for more than two years.

      the company even, off the record, states that they do not enforce the clause unless your server is causing problems for other users (excessive bandwidth usage)

    6. Re:Personal server by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I gave up on .mac and set up an old G4 as my home webserver. It's free, I'm in control, and I've learned a lot. Tell me, what scripts can you run on .mac? Does .mac support perl? mySQL? Note: I don't actually use mySQL for my website, although I could if I wanted! Anyway, don't confuse .mac with having your own webserver. You've got a web host, and one that is very lame in some ways, very cool in others.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    7. Re:Personal server by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      You better check your TOS. Such a thing will certainly violate 99.9% of all non business type accounts with internet service providers.
      Whatever else you may feel about SBC, their TOS specifically permit you to run servers.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    8. Re:Personal server by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      I gave up on .mac and set up an old G4 as my home webserver. It's free, I'm in control, and I've learned a lot. Tell me, what scripts can you run on .mac? Does .mac support perl? mySQL?
      I have both .Mac and my own 24/7/365 Linux server on an old G4. I have .Mac host most of my content since my DSL upstream is only 128Kbps (as are most upstream caps). To run CGIs or other scripts, I simply have the web pages on .Mac point to my home server. That tiny bit of upstream bandwidth can be handled no problem. It's also nice to have a complete mirror of my site as a backup.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    9. Re:Personal server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice way to have boxes for DDoS use :)

    10. Re:Personal server by Isbiten · · Score: 1

      Nice, but do you think a regular user want to go through all that hassle?

      Besides .Mac got everything I need ^^

      --
      I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    11. Re:Personal server by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      Right, and what is the reason people put up with TOS like this? It is exactly because almost nobody cares about running a server, because they see the Internet as nothing more than a way to browse webpages and get email. Only us geeks care. But if running a small server becomes popular, so that it becomes one of the main reasons people buy Internet service, people will start to take notice of things like this, and the ISPs will have no choice but change their TOS to allow servers, and make their services more server-friendly. That's the kind of thing I want to see in an ISP. The Internet is unrestricted 2-way communication for everyone, not HTML and Flash downloaded from "content providers."

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    12. Re:Personal server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The box has direct support for most Dynamic DNS providers directly (DynDNS, ZoneEdit) and has an advanced command for dynamic DNS services Axentra doesn't know about! So Rumba is ready for sharing files, creating and publishing web pages out-of-the-box.

    13. Re:Personal server by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when you turn it on, does it ask you to choose a name and automatically register itself as "name".axentra.com? No? Then the type of people who don't know what a dynamic DNS service is or why they want one (which would be a large part of the target market of this box) won't ever get a permanent DNS name for their server, and the box will be that much less useful to them. It's all about ease of use.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  7. How lame by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    1 WAN port (extra Wi-Fi USB device required)

    1 WAN port (and 2 LAN ports). What the hell is a WAN port? Is it ethernet or not? Is it just slow 10 mbps ethernet rather than something faster? And why the hell require an extra Wi-Fi device? And if it has to be USB (I'm guessing because there are no slots, or no slots available), then why put USB 1.1 on a new product when the rest of the world is dealing with USB 2? Particularly when current Wi-Fi (802.11g) is a lot faster than the ill-conceived USB 1.1?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:How lame by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

      The "WAN" port is just a NIC interface for connecting to you cable modem/ xDSL modem I bet. So they are calling it a WAN port. It's a consumer appliance so they figure they will call it some thing incorrect and really confuse people. "Connecgt your cable/adsl modem to the WAN port and your computers to either of the provided LAN ports." Or some such instructions.

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
    2. Re:How lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What the hell is a WAN port?

      Built-in ATM interface.

      Home edition.
    3. Re:How lame by CrosbieSmith · · Score: 1

      And if it has to be USB, then why put USB 1.1 on a new product when the rest of the world is dealing with USB 2?

      'Cause the board is cheaper. Also, it's the fastest fanless model. Having said that, I agree. If I bought something like this, fast connection to an external backup drive would be a must.
  8. A stepping stone? by mphase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This seems like it could be a good stepping stone for more advanced Windows users to discover Linux. As long as the price isn't too much greater than what it would cost to build you own, I could see this creating it's own little market.

    1. Re:A stepping stone? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Example A:

      My exploits so far:

      - P-Pro150 (overclocked to 180 woo!) RedHat 7.2 install. Died in a week due to dead hard drive.

      - RH 8 on a P3 800 (work) that had a bad BIOs, Windows crashed when using the IDE channels. It worked as a spam filter for a while before a faster machine was needed. (I just installed, didn't do the software setup.)

      - Knoppix CDs burned and passed out to tech pals, used for diagnosis and getting critical files off dead OS on NTFS. Plus sorta fun to play with. Got stumped by network drivers on my primary machine, or would have put it on the hard drive too.

      - Smoothwall 1 (makes a PC into a Linux firewall appliance) installed and mostly configured. Made this out of curiosity, wanting to read logs of my cable modem, why are the lights blinking all the time, even when my router is _off_. Also it waits around for when someone needs a firewall in a hurry as a stop-gap measure (for work).

      This device seems like a great toy for me, and it also seems like it would be a good large, wired family thing.. or a small business (two or three employees) tool.

    2. Re:A stepping stone? by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      Made this out of curiosity, wanting to read logs of my cable modem, why are the lights blinking all the time, even when my router is _off_.
      So why were they blinking?
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  9. not too exciting by mOoZik · · Score: 0, Interesting

    having used the VIA motherboards, I can say they are unfit for any moderate-duty, web-server work. They are inferior to the Celeron, and even the Celeron is unfit for the job. USB 1.1 is unacceptable now. At least 2.0, or Firewire 800 would be better. Anyone who would be able to set one up as a Gateway or have the knowledge to set up a relatively secure server would be able to build one for themselves for a good amount (probably much less than what that item will sell for, though there is no price yet.)

    1. Re:not too exciting by RighteousFunby · · Score: 1

      This is a server. Most servers are actually unlikely to need FIrewire or USB.

      And for the record, yes, VIA motherboards DO as a matter of fact choke on dick.

      Just remember that this is a server, or a firewall. It's not, in actual fact, a super gaming machine designed for l33t haX0r d00ds, it's just a great idea-a virtually plug and play Linux solution for everyone who needs a server of pretty much any kind.

      I love it. I want one.

    2. Re:not too exciting by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      1. if webservers worked fine in 1998 with 400mhz, then 800 today will be fine. (we are not running the 2004 olympics on one server here so its ok)

      2. what server needs USB2 ? cameras? video devices? get outa here. 1.1 is ENOUGH!!

      3. the point is that if X company wants 20 boxes stacked as a rendering farm or crack server, or game servers, then its easy just to order and plugin, no ones gona hack away for 500 hrs building 30 servers by hand.

      But on the other hand, id love to have an OQO , stack like 4000 of them in one room and make a super computer fit in one 19inch rack box. might get very hot though....

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    3. Re:not too exciting by GiMP · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Firewire is very useful for servers, actually.
      It has several uses:
      1. Cheapest hot-swappable ide/raid solution
      2. Cheapest hot-swappable scsi-raid solution (after something around 200-400gigabytes)
      3. Replacement for firewire and endorsed by Oracle:
      http://oss.oracle.com/projects/firewire/

    4. Re:not too exciting by iamthemoog · · Score: 1

      2. what server needs USB2 ? cameras? video devices? get outa here...

      Inexpensive backup? Get an external USB2 drive and back up your device as & when.

      moog

      --
      No Norm, those are your safety glasses; I'll wear my own thanks...
  10. Dance dance dance! by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

    The Rumba with a samba server. First slashdot was making it too easy, now these guys?

    That's it. I give up.

    --

    --
    "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    1. Re:Dance dance dance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me, I want to bolt my Samba running Rumba to my Roomba!

  11. parent is troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and no, they are not short for "Macintosh OS" and "Macintosh OS X". It is simply "Mac OS" and "Mac OS X".
    yes they fucking are you troll.
    1. Re:parent is troll by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      No, no they're not. See for yourself. Find ONE instance of "Macintosh OS" on that entire site (apple.com).

    2. Re:parent is troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, wtf is your problem?

      no one has any doubt, except you, what the usage of Mac meant.

    3. Re:parent is troll by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of "knowing what they mean". You'd know what I meant if I straed tklanig scarmlbed lkie tihs... but it wouldn't be correct.

  12. Re:More nitpicking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    MAC: The acronymfinder returns 111 meanings for MAC

    the first one listed is Apple Macintosh computer, which is odd as it is the wrong way round.

    Also, Magnetic Accelerator Cannon (Babylon 6), which is also strange shouldn't that be Babylon 5?!

  13. Re:More nitpicking by JessLeah · · Score: 1

    Well, it's wrong for "Apple Macintosh computer" anyhow. It's "Mac", not "MAC".

  14. Not enough space for porn requirements! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean we all know that "photo album" is really just "porn collection" in disguise.

    But does it run Li.... Oh.

  15. Knoppix, Morphix any LiveCD would be as good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Definitely cheaper, and by my reckoning, better by far. Better in the sense that you could put that wasted hard drive money into RAM. If the thing is to act as a server you don't want it reading off a hard drive anyway. Skip the hard drive and add a Gig of RAM and you could still be less than two hundred bucks with all new parts. If someone bought one of these and then you showed them the right way to do it with a LiveCD, they'd feel like they had been ripped off.
    Once you get past ten gigs or so, the real purpose of a hard drive becomes juke box or media management center as opposed to old fashioned computing. This thing is obviously marketed as a server and not as a media device so the 20gig drive is essentially just a way to get rid of old inventory. Sure it's cool because it's GNU/Linux, but let's not get carried away just for that. It's not important to have Best Buy and Circuit City prostletyze Open Source, it really doesn't fit in their scummy bag of sales tricks and they will just make it look like a rip off with misfit products like this. Product placement is life and death in the market, but strictly speaking GNU/Linux isn't in the market since it's available for free as in beer. I believe that is its primary strength.
    But speaking of prostletyzing, I digress. Back to the topic of using dated hardware appropriately, I think Murdoch has a better use for those old hard drives which is to use the next generation of video compression to make them look like fat PVRs. At least it's an efficient use of an outdated technology rather than pawning them off as "server" use.

    1. Re:Knoppix, Morphix any LiveCD would be as good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A LiveCD server, how fucking genius and cheap and good

      right until you actually want to you know serve somthing with your server huh?

    2. Re:Knoppix, Morphix any LiveCD would be as good. by cubal · · Score: 1

      I dunno... I'd be using a hard drive in any server. Using a server for file storage makes a whole lotta sense, especially if you have several interchangeable workstations. I'd get fed up with not being able to store files on it.

      Also, what's the point of using it as an http/samba/webdav server if it has no hard drive? It's got nothing to serve...

    3. Re:Knoppix, Morphix any LiveCD would be as good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why does parent have 2 interesting mods

      YOU CAN'T SERVE MUCH FROM A LIVECD SERVER!!!

      no one is impressed by a server that can't serve

      not even jesus

    4. Re:Knoppix, Morphix any LiveCD would be as good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh a RAM disk
      Real useful until you get a power cut.

      comeon
      A LiveCD is not the way to run a server
      admit it.

    5. Re:Knoppix, Morphix any LiveCD would be as good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Don't buy that at all. First of all, if you really care you would get a UPS. Either way, you just run cron DB backups to your RAID over the ethernet. Lose the last few posts to the forums once or twice a year, I think everybody will get over it if your sites are actually getting serious posts every few minutes --yeah right. If it's just static content then there's even less to get excited about.

  16. Yes! It's both firewall and giant security hole! by jerryasher · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wel according to the article the machine offers nothing to make configuring the firewall (IP Filtering + NAT) easy or foolproof.

    So what do we got? Not much more than cheapo walmart pc and distro.

    We got a linux based firewall running on the same machine as the files and photos and everything else.

    What the hell is the difference between this and any other linux machine?

    It certainly won't make security or sysadmin any easier.

    It's a home linux nightmare waiting to happen. Can't wait.

  17. compatable with windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well im not buying it then :).

  18. Wheezer Sneezer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Everyone sign along: "Rumba, Roomba, let's call the whole thing off!"

    Ah! I've got it! All techy things in the new millenium have to rhyme, and not just once, multiple times!

    Romper Stomper Bomper Boo, buy my crap -hey buy two!

    Magic mirror, I see dead people. Ooops. Too much genre blending.

  19. Good old Roomba by segment · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good old Roomba. Saved me from back pain plenty a times... You did mean the vacuum didn't you?

  20. Appliance good, but mini-itx has fallen short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What I would like is that Via come out with some more powerfull proccessors. Their 1 gig is only about equal to a 700 celeron, and depending on what it is actually doing it can get beat out with a 300Mhz pentium in bench marks.

    I love the small formfactor stuff. If you got a vid card, sound card, networking card, and 1 or 2 pci slots, what more do you need for a desktop computer??

    And I was wanting to build one, but a 2.2ghz celeron with a low-end mini-atx motherboard is cheaper then a mini-ITX 800mhz C3 motherboard and 10x more capable.

    just buy a efficiant fan, underclock/undervolt the cpu and get a nice heatsink and you'll be able to make it as quiet as any C3, except for the fanless ones.

    1. Re:Appliance good, but mini-itx has fallen short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting that ATX motherboards need big old noisy ATX power supplies.

    2. Re:Appliance good, but mini-itx has fallen short by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      And I was wanting to build one, but a 2.2ghz celeron with a low-end mini-atx motherboard is cheaper then a mini-ITX 800mhz C3 motherboard and 10x more capable.

      I suppose it depends on where you are looking. By cheaper the price comparison's I've found are only about $10 difference. However there are other design considerations as well. For the purpose this is intended (home firewall, web server and file server) 800MHz is overkill. I'm writing my dissertation on a 950MHz VIA EPIA with OpenOffice and 950MHz is plenty for that.

      just buy a efficiant fan, underclock/undervolt the cpu and get a nice heatsink and you'll be able to make it as quiet as any C3, except for the fanless ones.

      Doesn't underclocking remove the basic reason for going with the Celeron to begin with? An underclocked Celeron is still a dog in the power consumption area, and by the time you spend the extra money on the heat sink and fan, you might as well just buy the EPIA.

  21. Re:MOD THIS -1 REDUNDANT PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent stole this from here

    No need to think grandparent actually read that comment before posting.

  22. File Server by Seft · · Score: 1

    Useful as a file server with only 40GB HDD? I can't see that taking off...

    1. Re:File Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyones porn collection is as large as yours.

  23. Re:Lightweight server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The device has a mini ITX mobo, VIA C3 800 MHz CPU, 256 MB RAM, 40 GB hdd, USB 1.1, 2 LAN ports and in 1 WAN port

    The heavy-server is a system fault-tolerant of 2 computers.

    A lightweight-server-low-consumption is a system quasi-fault-tolerant of low-consumption from a computer with ECC memory and low-voltage microprocessor !!!
    [the measurements are the wattages, not the frecuencies]

    open4free

  24. Home Linux Firewalls by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd much rather take an older computer and throw ClarkConnect on it. Comparing the feature list above with CC's features:

    Security
    * Stateful Firewall * Intrusion detection with Snort * Secure shell via SSH * IPsec VPN (Office Edition only) * PPTP VPN (Office Edition only)
    Web Server
    * Apache web server * Support for CGI and PHP * Secure/SSL support
    File Services
    * Journalled file system with ext3 * FTP server * Windows file server * AppleShare file server
    E-mail
    * POP and IMAP servers * SMTP server
    Filtering
    * Banner ad blocking * Web proxy * Content filtering (Office Edition only)
    Printing
    * Print server support * Printer sharing for Samba/Windows networks
    Easy Configuration
    * Web-based configuration* Optional Webmin package
    Network Support
    * DSL (including PPPoE) * Cable Modem * 802.11b Wireless (Office Edition only) * Internal DHCP server * Caching nameserver

    There's a few not listed on the quick info page, such as Gallery and SpamAssassin, but you get the picture. Not to say that you couldn't add on to the software on the Rumba, after all it is Linux based, but who says they'll make it easy for you to do so. I have no problems adding new goodies to my ClarkConnect box, such as a NWN and TeamSpeak server for my gaming friends or SliMP3 server for around the house music, and I wouldn't give that up.

    To give fair time to two other Linux firewall distros I've used in the past and like almost as much as ClarkConnect, check out Smoothwall and IPCop.

    Jonah Hex

    1. Re:Home Linux Firewalls by palp · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about Astaro Security Linux... I've been happily using it as a firewall box for quite a while. A bit more robust than IPCop and Smoothwall in my experiance. I'll have to check out ClarkConnect though, looks interesting.

      --
      -palp
    2. Re:Home Linux Firewalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No FAX-Server (i.e. Hylafax). Makes it rather limited.

    3. Re:Home Linux Firewalls by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      My technical computer background started in home environments back in the DOS days and is still pretty heavy towards the Win/MS side, with my Linux knowledge mostly from the various firewall implementations. However I've had great success with installing apps on my CC box, such as the NWN and TeamSpeak servers I mentioned in the above comment, as well as mySQL. And while I haven't installed any FAX software, several posts on the CC forums say they've installed Hylafax using the given instructions on it's site. ClarkConnect is based on RedHat 9 and has rpm and apt-get, or you can compile new programs from source if that's what you prefer.

      Jonah Hex

  25. The most astonishing thing is... by rcs1000 · · Score: 0, Informative

    ...that no-one spotted that the "Axentra" link (www.axentra.com) goes to a completely different company, that offers an on-line contact management, etc. system.

    "Homebase Anywhere"...

    Glad to see no-one RTFA.

    (RTFA? You must be new here...)

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
    1. Re:The most astonishing thing is... by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 4, Informative
      It is the same company, talk about not RTFA
      OSNews was tipped off that OEone (previous stories: 1, 2, 3), creators of the desktop HomeBase SUITE (based on Linux, X and Mozilla's APIs), now are moving to server space. Next week they are going to announce an exciting new product (under a new brand name: "Axentra Rumba Server") which puts Linux back to the server space, but with the form of a user-friendly and cute-looking appliance.
      Jonah Hex
    2. Re:The most astonishing thing is... by rcs1000 · · Score: 1

      Ouch!

      How right you are. My apologies for my stupidity and ignorance...

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    3. Re:The most astonishing thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG!! Someone who admits a mistake, and does it graciously!!! You must be from the Bizarro Universe Slash Dot.

  26. Via C3 doesn't fit on socket A by Schugy · · Score: 0

    I have a Asus A7V133 with 1gb SDRAM lying around. I don't think it's good to use a 50W cpu (AthlonB 900mhz) for idle tasks. Stupid thing.

    1. Re:Via C3 doesn't fit on socket A by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Power dissipation is higher when the processor is doing more work. While the C3 will have less power use at idle than the Athlon will, consider the energy cost that goes into making that other motherboard. It might cost you a little more to run it but it's probably cheaper for the planet to use it than to buy a new system.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. Slashdot overestimates how many build their own... by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In my view, there is a tendency on Slashdot to overestimate the number of people who build their own systems. I work with many technically literate people. A large number of whom are willing to install wireless networks, put an new video card in their computers, etc.

    But very few build whole computers from scratch. They don't view it as worth their effort. They would rather buy an off-the-shelf system, and maybe add a little memory. A year down the road put in a bigger hard drive...

    My point, the vast majority of technically literate people DON'T build their own from scratch.

  28. Already out of the bag. by GiMP · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think TigerDirect already let this one out of the bag. The website says that they will announce it (and it's price) soon. This week's TigerDirect catalog already has it..

    TigerDirect print ad

    The ad specifically mentions that it supports WiFi wireless networking /w any standard usb->wireless adapter. WiFi is NOT standard.

    1. Re:Already out of the bag. by GiMP · · Score: 2, Informative

      To avoid people simply wondering about the price from slashdotting me:
      $499.99

      If you're ordering one, tell TigerDirect Item # A555-1000

    2. Re:Already out of the bag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!!

    3. Re:Already out of the bag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're ordering from Tiger Direct, you are brave or insane.

    4. Re:Already out of the bag. by GiMP · · Score: 1

      TigerDirect happens to be the only source of these things right now, that I'm aware of.

      I ordered a refurbished dell monitor from them, and had to have it replaced twice because the first two died within a week.. the second time I went with a nice brand-new NEC. The NEC has been great.

      I do blame TigerDirect for selling such shitty monitors from Dell, but the problem was Dell's - not TigerDirect's. TigerDirect took care of me and I exchanged for the new NEC monitor to much joy.

  29. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic? What? He's precisely right. It's just another ad.

  30. SME Server (a.k.a. e-Smith) ??? by ivi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it just me, or does this thing sound exactly like the e-Smith server/Internet gateway from a few years back?

    It ran a modified Red Hat, was an "Internet appliance" turn-key CD-ROM for any recent x86 box, & did all the fun router/web server/email server/file server stuff with just a simple web interface.

    What's old is new again, I suppose.

  31. This is ok but... by trinity93 · · Score: 0
    If you need something with a bit more power to replace an ageing cobalt rack take a look at this..

    http://www.amoebasoft.com/amoebaapp/

    My company has been working on this device for a while, though its not quite ready yet, it will be a lot closer to a cobalt in features and flexability. This takes a lot more ram and harddrive. Base price will be $1500 bucks.

    Comes with...

    2.4 ghz p4
    40 gig hd upgradeable up to 2 of what ever the largest drives avaliable
    Comes with 256meg of ram upgradeable to 2 gig
    Two 10/100/1000 ethernet ports (gigE)
    Comes with Amoeba Linux with web based administration and package managment
    One pci slot
    CD rom drive

    Nice eh? Let me know what you think of it.
    --
    We substituted the coffee Slashdot normally drinks with "Sandoz Crystals", Lets see if they notice the difference
  32. Re:More nitpicking by Turq · · Score: 1

    Apple Macintosh Computer. . .

    Hmm.. AMC? Well, both the Pacer and the Mac are funny looking. ;)

    - Turq.

    --
    - Turq - "That's TRON, he fights for the users."
  33. It's an UPLINK port by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Of course it's ethernet.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  34. BLATANT ADVERTISING - MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent down

    1. Re:BLATANT ADVERTISING - MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea just like the article to begin with

  35. Re:Yes! It's both firewall and giant security hole by GiMP · · Score: 1

    The difference between this and any other linux machine is a small footprint, high cost, no video card, and (hopefully) quiet operating.

  36. Is this a challenge? by rabel · · Score: 1

    Googling around, we even found a test server for the Axentra Rumba Server. Go on, give it some stress testing!

    Ummm... they don't know us very well, do they?

  37. Re:More nitpicking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gotta back you up on the Mac/MAC thing, but still, dude, get some midol.

  38. What is the power consumption by elgaard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As other have mentionen you can put together an old computer with linux that will do most of the same tasks and cost less. But it will take up more space and the saving will be eaten by the power bills (appliances like this have longer lifetimes than PC's). You can also get an old laptop for less than $500. It uses ~20Watt (monitor turned off and disk spinned down). 20W is still 1700 kWh in 10 years.

    I think their presentation misses a good selling point. It could be a backup server. Although it will not be offsite (unless you use a USB removable disk) a lot of familes could benefit from a backup server at home.

    1. Re:What is the power consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 12C/KWh that's two bucks a year for the twenty watt. Whoa, that's definitely worth buying a notebook instead of say an ATX P4 1.7 that would use 45watts and end up costing you five bucks a year.
      Hmm, clearly the electricity issue is foremost here and it makes great sense to spend a few hundred bucks to save two dollars a year in electricity costs because electricity is very rare in the universe and we will soon be out if we don't save up what we have left.

      http://windows.uwaterloo.ca/PC_Power_Consumption .h tm

    2. Re:What is the power consumption by elgaard · · Score: 1

      20*24*365*0.12/1000 = $21.0

    3. Re:What is the power consumption by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      Power consumtion is simply not a problem for anything under the level of "major appliance", ie fridge, air cond, etc. Since my AC is off for the season (and my heat/stove is gas) my electric bills has dropped to around $30 a month, and that includes running 3 computers 24/7 with NO power management enabled. Of course my ClarkConnect firewall box rarely has a monitor attached to it, and my Video/Jukebox/eMule machine only has the monitor on for a few hours each day.

      Jonah Hex

  39. Tranquil PC by lkaos · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised there's been no mention of the Tranquil PC. This is perhaps the quietest and sexiest mini-itx based system and the starting price is ~$600 USD.

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
  40. You're telling me a vacuum can do all that? by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    Hot damn! That's pretty smooth. I love the idea of having a vacuum that can be an internet appliance as well. I guess someone had to do it eventually. What? Oh... you said Rumba not Roomba.

    1. Re:You're telling me a vacuum can do all that? by slyborg · · Score: 1

      LO...oh, you're the fourth post with this same weak joke.

    2. Re:You're telling me a vacuum can do all that? by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Hey... yah know what?? Come here... I've got a little secret for ya... Come closer...
      GO FUCK YOURSELF!

  41. Wow by simonbp · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow, this device is almost identicle to the pentium 266mx in a cardboard box next to me!

    How much did it cost me? $20....

    Simon ;)

  42. Re:Slashdot overestimates how many build their own by cide1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work with a bunch of embedded applications developers, and I know of only one other guy who builds his own machine. First off, they view their time as valuable. Every minute they can spend with their families is worth it, and building a machine can be time consuming. Pricing out parts, and getting up to date knowledge can take a lot of research. Second, as people get older, it seems they just don't want to mess with it. This is synonymous to old cars. Young people will tend to buy cars and restore them, while many older people will prefer to buy the car already restored. It costs more money, but they don't have to mess with it. Finally, with computers, when you buy legal software, I don't think you save any money when building your own, and most people want the warranties and one source of support that come with someone like Dell.

    --
    -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
  43. Rumba? by santos_douglas · · Score: 1

    All in one server box yes, but can it vacuum your entire house on it's own?

    1. Re:Rumba? by slyborg · · Score: 1

      Ok, that's it...you guys have been asking for it...

      http://homepage.mac.com/fbrunner/files/PhotoAlbum4 .html

    2. Re:Rumba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now *that's* funny.

  44. WAN vs. LAN by The+Monster · · Score: 1
    What the hell is a WAN port? Is it ethernet or not?
    It's an Ethernet port that's configured to be connected to your cable/DSL/whatever to access the rest of the world. Since this thing's acting as a firewall, I assume it's like the 486SLC-40 I turned into a Linux Router Project box a few years ago. I had two NICs in it, and labeled the back of the case LAN and WAN.

    The distinction between WAN port and LAN port is that someone coming in from the WAN side is assumed to be a script kiddie until proven otherwise. And that's if you open up any access from the outside at all. The Prime Directive of Firewalls says that an attempt to open a socket from the WAN side should fail. The most notable exception is for FTP, but the corresponding socket must have been opened from the LAN side out first. Also, they mention VPN capability - the tunneled traffic is considered to be LAN for firewall purposes.

    Yes, they could call the ports 'eth0', 'eth1', and 'eth2', but that doesn't explain their functions.

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  45. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at your profile suggest your a member of the canadian liberal party...

    Here's the deal, cooperation under most circumstances in trade for fucking over canadian goverment policy, trade, and income generation. I do not do weapons. Trade will be in intellectual property and strategy.

  46. Re:Nobody knows what a WAN port is anymore? by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1
    What the hell is a WAN port?

    A WAN interface is an interface that connects you to a larger routed network. Traditionally, that's your nailed up line (T-1/leased-line/Frame connection/etc). A WAN port is an open slot, usually on a router or similar appliance, that you can use to insert a card for handling a connection as above. As others have indicated, this could potentially be used for your DSL connection by just putting an ethernet card in it. However the article seems to indicate that this is a USB port, and 1.1 at that, so they're probably right that it's better suited to connecting to a wireless LAN. Though that hardly makes it a WAN port.

    --
    "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
    --James Madison
  47. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using psychology in negative ways to create a climate of fear (people dying from lighting strikes are of greater statical concern), using a spin off of that fear for conformity (also applies to the negative), social and economic gain. Milking victim psychology for all it's worth, trama can originate from the concillers not the act.

    The shock of 9/11 has worn away and predictable crime (propaganda) weilding against individuals for polictical gain is once again becoming the norm.

    It's not oppression or repression, it's a HOWTO file.

  48. Dammit by Rinisari · · Score: 0

    I came up with this idea about 4 years ago, and had I not been only 14 I would have patented the damned thing.

    VIA mobo, a customized version of Trustix, with all the amenities a home needs. I would have put in a four-port hub, and would have planned upgrade space for a wireless standard because it was just budding on the consumer market at the time. It would have been the shit.

  49. Roomba Server? by SunPin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard it sucks.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Roomba Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard Microsoft is making their own version. Chances are good it won't suck.

  50. Re: Good or Bad? by Its_My_Hair · · Score: 1

    Maybe with a simple server appliance people will get the idea that they can publish stuff on the web and share stuff with their friends and family that way


    Would having thousands of servers with exactly the same configuration and hardware be a good thing. We've seen what happens when problems are found in today's servers. Sure, it would be easy to fix them all with one patch, but even people that run servers today don't patch them up as much as they should... Would the average user running an out-of-the-box server patch it? probably not.

  51. Re:Yes! It's both firewall and giant security hole by Bob9113 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mod parent up (I have no points right now).

    I set up a Xandros box and (stupidly) left it exposed to the outside world without shutting down all of the default services. It being Debian based, and hence having apt, I kept the software up to date with all the patches from security.debian.org. Not good enough. About a week later someone came in through a service (which was not part of the standard Debian distro) meant for system administration that had the port open to * (as opposed to 127.0.0.1).

    The lesson is that easy to use distros with lots of things to make it easy on the end user (like WebDAV) are all well and good behind a firewall, or as a sacrificial box in the DMZ, but should not themselves be the firewall. It would be possible to create a firewall in a box that would keep itself up to date, but with all the bells and whistles on this thing, it's going to be as dangerous as Windows.

    Microsoft would have a fair point if they said this, "if you want a lot of open ports and friendly services for easy system interop, and you don't know how or don't want to invest the time to secure your machine, and you don't keep the software up to date, it will be compromised." The same is true of Linux.

  52. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark today on the calander. It's predicable, reliable and certain. Beyond a shadow of doubt intent.

    Incrimental increases in criminal outcomes for profit, not for social justice.

  53. X Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an X server known as "Rumba" for Win32 so I was initially confused by this article.

  54. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This course will not be alterable for 4 months (without reinforcement). It's laughable and sad.

  55. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though attributed to the liberal bias. I doubt the process is endorsed (gains have been achieved).

  56. To the back of the queue, please... by C+A+S+S+I+E+L · · Score: 1
    There are quite a few of these things out there already, with different selections of customisation of services. A specific, market-oriented example might be the KnowledgeBox, but that in itself is customised on a more generic platform like the Kyzo or Equiinet.

    The Mini-ITX hardware is a cute way to go though, if you don't mind the world of hurt which comes of trying to get the onboard VIA Rhine-II ethernet to work. At this very moment I'm part way through a Red Hat install onto a Mini-ITX which is going to be my new firewall and mail exchanger...

  57. Sounds like the Toshiba Magnia SG25 by djaburg · · Score: 1

    Toshiba has had a box like this for some time. In fact I picked one up for testing for a scant $299. It was the SG20, but it still works as advertised. Not too powerful, but could work for a small workgroup. Here is a link to those boxes.

  58. Re:Free Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore!

  59. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name an IRC channel. Is the baby killer scared???

  60. Re:Slashdot overestimates how many build their own by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I generally tell people not to build their own/use a prebuilt system. Why? Because new machines are generally ATX and because they can get a support contract, which means they're not calling me whenever anything fails. Sure, I still get harassed for software issue, but friends and relatives aren't expecting me to come out and swap their video card for them. The exception is my father, who has been placed at the end of my upgrade queue. When I upgrade, my girlfriend gets my old system (or video card or whatever) and he gets hers.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  61. Nice advertisement, sucker by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    But since there's already a shitload of 1U servers out there, for less than a grand, you're only going to rope in other suckers.

    Besides which, Cobalt Raqs have a nice-looking case and a LCD for status and setup. Your case is ugly as hell. You can buy a case that ugly at fry's.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Nice advertisement, sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you buy a 1U server for firewalling your kids machine from the net?
      You are wealth dude!

    2. Re:Nice advertisement, sucker by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, I am getting a raq3 donated, which I may try to roll something custom for. Some of the specs say they can have two ethernet interfaces. Right now I have a slot 1 athlon whose mb+cpu cost $51 I believe, some time ago. My PC itself is in a 4U aluminum rack case which I purchased back when I had some dot-com money left.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  62. An idea whose time has come? by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the idea behind this thing becomes popular, it's a matter of time before someone starts knocking out something similar on the cheap. All-in-one mobos are cheap as chips, and drivers don't seem to be as much of a problem as they used to be anymore. Stick one in a case, add a hard drive and maybe a DVD-ROM and pop your favourite distro on it. If it has TV-out, supply a SCART to phono and 3.5mm stereo lead {you may have to solder this yourself} and it'll run into any modern enough telly. A TV receiver / video capture card would make it into a tapeless VCR.

    It might need a console-based configuration utility for setting its IP address. Once that's done, and the machine is on a network, everything else can be done through a web browser with a bit of p(hp|erl|ython) scripting.

    It could firewall off your vulnerable Windows boxes from your ADSL connection, and provide a proxy to block ad.doubleclick.net and other objectionable sites. No ADSL? Then it can do on-demand dialling. It could collect your e-mail from several different servers and distribute it amongst several desktop machines - you can use POP3 to collect it and thus obviate the need for a static IP address. With the video and audio outputs, it could be a telejuke.

    And, because it's programmable, some loon will almost certainly find a use for it none of us have thought of yet.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:An idea whose time has come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That already exists for a few years now.

      http://www.allwell.tv

  63. Sounds alot like... by The_Real_MrRabbit · · Score: 1

    the Net Integrator series... http://www.net-itech.com =8-)

  64. But does it do some things that others have? by DraconPern · · Score: 1

    Does it support UPnP? Many new home routers do this now, eg. Netgear, Linksys. Also, does it support socks5? A lot of application that are broken behind NAT have the ability to use SOCKS5. For example, file transfer in icq/AIM, and voice/video.

  65. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good at advertising (especially corporations), has the worst track record is history (1/2 of it's undertakings large and small have gone under) in the last ten years. Represents the richest in the country and claims to be for the poorest.

  66. Re:Slashdot overestimates how many build their own by des09 · · Score: 1
    I am currently working for a start-up on a very limited budget, and although I have the ability to build servers and workstations, we buy them from Grace. We also bought a sonicwall firewall / dns appliance as soon as we could afford it to replace my iptables based home-brew. We outsource our email, and pay for supported hosting. Why? Because all these items are outside our core business, and to succeed we cannot afford to spend the time to do these things right, and we definitely can't afford to do them half-a$$ed. We will probably buy one of these, hopefully soon.

    At home, time and money are even tighter, and I do build my own boxes, maintain my own firewall, etc. It hasn't saved a penny, just made it possible to buy nicer kit, and the only way I can justify the time spent is the jump up the learning curve.

    --
    .sigless since 2003
  67. Re:SME Server (a.k.a. e-Smith) STILL ACTIVE by gavinjolly · · Score: 1

    OLD??? I am a total Linux Newbie and my first project was to install an e-smith server at home as a gateway server. It is still under active development by Mitel's as it is used for their Mitel Networks 6000 Managed Application Server .

    I use it to:

    • Act as a Domain COntroller for my home network (Windows PC's)
    • Host web application I am testing. Comes with PHP, MySQL, APACHE, other stuff
    • Web filtering (ala DansGuardian)
    • IMAP Mail available for each local user account
    • External Access to IMAP with IMP from HORDE that comes preinstalled
    • Web administration panel
      • Absolutely awesome product that I really recommend. It has worked for me better than I imagined.

    --

    The weathers here - Wish you were beautiful

  68. Real hackers know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing sucks like a Vax!

  69. Amiga support? by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

    What, no Amiga support? Fuck it then. Why do the 99.9999% of users get all the new toys?

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  70. Price and test server! by burns210 · · Score: 1
    the price is $500us, not a bad deal at all.

    For bored slashdotters, HERE and HERE are 2 web servers running on these things... /. effect!

  71. Re:Slashdot overestimates how many build their own by don.g · · Score: 1

    Even I have really only *built* one PC - and that was out of spare parts. My desktop (now an Athlon 900) was merely upgraded a few times... from a 4.77Mhz XT. Although I did use to take said XT to bits and then put it back together again - does that count as building?

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  72. Perfect by TLouden · · Score: 1

    now I don't have to go through dell for my next computer purchase, this is exactly what I've been looking for

    --
    -Tim Louden
  73. Better rename it by kelzer · · Score: 1

    Rumba is a registered trademark.

    It's software product from NetManage that is close enough in functionality to this product that they would probably have a valid trademark infringement claim.

    --

    ---------------------------------------------
    SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  74. Re:Slashdot overestimates how many build their own by sootman · · Score: 1

    The reason I don't build boxes anymore is economics. Back when I could build a system for a grand that was comparable to a $1500 OEM box, or save money by leaving off things I didn't need (first computer had no sound card), it was worth it. Plus my time wasn't worth as much--no family, low-paying job. Now, I can get a 2.2 GHz Dell with a 17" CRT for $499 (dell.com/tv) or I can go around and buy a bunch of parts for about the same amount, spend a couple hours putting it all together, hope you got all the jumpers right when you power it on, and still have to find a monitor and a pirated copy of Windows. Same with cars. You can spend 20 minutes and $20 at a drive-through oil place, or spend $12 on oil and filters so you can dig out your wheel chocks, jack up your car on your sloping driveway, and crawl around underneath for a half-hour scraping your knuckes on the frame.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  75. But is it $10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the same functionality from a $10 P166 machine I picked up from my local Goodwill store. I run ClarkConnect (a Linux distro prebuilt for all the stuff mentioned in the article), and have had no problems.

  76. ...mini-itx has fallen short... no, it hasn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you talking about ? This is a Home/Soho Server. It does not need that much power.

    I intentionally bought a VIA C3M266-L ATX board along with a 1GHz C3 Nehemiah CPU - which actually is the same as the EPIA M10000B MiniITX systems - because I *wanted* this CPU so badly. It consumes at full load not more than 11W. I cool it passivly. And I pay less at the end of the years, as running a Celeron 24/7. And the only thing the CPU needs to do in heavy load is archiving to the HotSwap S-ATA backupdisk I tend to purchase.

    This is completely sufficient. Those who do not want three PCI slots can go with the new EPIA CL8000 and CL10000, MiniITX with dual onboard NIC and 4 COM ports. 800 MHz or 1GHz.

  77. Mine r0xXerz ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you do not need USB on your print-server ? Better get one of the legacy LPT printers out there on ebay.

    No need for Firewire on a HomeServer ? Prefer to boot up your Desktop just to transmit that video you want to work on *later* ?

    I am not exactly sure, what "choke on dick" means, but I intentionally bought a VIA C3M266-L with a So370 VIA C3 Nehemiah 1GHz for exactly such a server I built myself. Why ? CPU is colled passivly. No noise in my living-room (PSU is an external passive ATX 110W). CPU is enuff for tarbz2-archiving, it goes automatic and cron'ned.
    Runs OpenBSD, btw. ;-)

    And yes, it still r0xX3rZ d00D !

  78. ad by gabe · · Score: 1

    here's the ad image as linked from osnews: http://grokthis.net/~raptor/rumba.jpg

    chock full of typos and a $499 price. not bad. (the price, not the typos)

    --
    Gabriel Ricard