Slashdot Mirror


Post Cobalt Alternatives?

wizman asks: "I co-own a small ISP that does a bit of web hosting - probably less than 150 domains. We have been using the Cobalt RAQ product line ever since our beginnings. We are outgrowing our current RAQ and have been planning to purchase a newer one. However, it seems that ever since Sun purchased Cobalt, they have been moving away from the RAQ platform. Because of the incredible slowless in which Sun patches vulnerabilities (just now seeing a new SSH package) on top of a number of other annoyances, I am now seriously considering other options." Current RAQ sysadmins: what are your plans for the near future? What would you do if you owned Cobalt RAQs? Would they stay or would they go?

"Let's break this question into two parts:

a) What have customers been migrating to? I am really impressed with web://cp, and have also investigated Plesk, cPanel, and a few other commercial ones. Most of them require some specific version of Red Hat, which is slightly irritating. I have also considered stock Apache/qmail/vmailmgr/etc, but I'm looking for something that grants a bit more power and flexibility to my end users.

b) How was the migration? We have hundreds and hundreds of e-mail accounts, aliases, mailing lists, etc on our existing RAQ's, and would like the transition to be as seamless as possible. I am looking to finally get around the info@domain1,info@domain 2 issue. Users don't seem to grasp the concept of making an account without a generic name and aliasing info@ to it, so any experiences on this are more than welcome! Our staff is rather limited (I'm pretty much it tech-wise), so the smoother the better!

I am also open to arguments for keeping the RAQ line. I have read that they are open sourcing sausalito and cme, but it looks like there is no short-term stable release of this. I'm looking at a few weeks to a few months as a migration timeframe."

9 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. Upgrade to a modern distribution like debian by dotslash · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have upgraded all our RAQs to the newest debian (woody/stable) distribution. The RAQ can be firmware upgraded to support 2.4 kernels. Add to that a modern distribution and it becomes a pretty good server. As for the ssh patch: apt-get upgrade fixed that within an hour of the anouncement. Debian rules!

    1. Re:Upgrade to a modern distribution like debian by Benley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Theoretically it is possible to use recent Linux 2.4 kernels on Cobalt MIPS machines. I did manage to get 2.4.18 or so to boot on a Qube2 (very similar to the raq2), but I did not get Debian installed on it. It should be possible, though. I later managed to get NetBSD to work on it as well.

  2. SunFire by CyberVenom · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have had a little experience with the early RAQ series from Cobalt, and personally I didn't like the setup very much. The management GUI was very nice, but most of the software and hardware was non-standard.
    I have used the SunFire V100, and have been very pleased with the results. I use the Debian distribution, which fully supports the SPARC architecture and for which patches are released promptly. The initial install was a little tricky, but far easier than installing Debian on a RAQ (which I did once too). Webmin can provide a nice interface for clients to configure things, and qmail/vpopmail/popauth/omail works well as an email solution.
    You can buy a new SunFire for less than $1000 too, which is a great price for an UltraSPARC in a 1U form factor.
    Some other interesting notes:
    I run software RAID1 across 2 IDE drives.
    I use the Tulip driver, not the Davicom driver.
    I used the Debian boot cd to load SILO, from which point I can load the kernel of my choosing.
    If anyoen wants, I may be able to dig up my notes on the exact install procedure I used for this machine.

    1. Re:SunFire by pmz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Keep in mind that this is a 650Mhz native-64-bit RISC CPU; it can hold its own against PIIIs and Athlons.

      This is only true for PIIIs under about 1GHz. I figured one time that the 400MHz UltraSPARC II CPUs compare to a 750MHz PIII in FP performance and to about a 450MHz PIII in integer (Spec95 numbers). Certainly a good general-purpose CPU with ECC RAM, etc., but not a computational powerhouse by modern standards.

      The Opteron is going to be a definite "if you can't beat'em join'em" CPU from Sun's point of view. I honestly hope that Opteron cleans Itanics clock, and the CPU landscape over the next few years is Opteron vs. IBM POWER vs. UltraSPARC, which, incidentally, is what people have been predicting for years (x86, PPC, and SPARC will be the only ISAs that remain after everyone else fizzles out).

    2. Re:SunFire by wizman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I appreciate everyone's input. However it seems most of the discussion so far has been hardware related. That end of things is fine - I have plenty of x86 boxen running Debian or FreeBSD. As the article mentions, I'm mainly looking for software solutions to provide our customers with a hosting control panel (Webmin is really not designed for this in a shared server environment) that will run on one of our existing platforms - Debian/x86 or FreeBSD/x86.

  3. As someone who's made the transition... by rute20740 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I migrated from a Cobalt RaQ setup after many many frustrating moments with the whole net appliance idea in general.

    I also needed the migration to be as smooth as possible, including all user auth, mail boxes/folders, lists and aliases.

    I decided to go with MySQL based authentication on Postfix, Courier-IMAP, Apache, and ProFTPd, all running on Debian. I Wrote a little web front end using PHP for user administration, and voila, we now have a much more flexible system. All MySQL auth patches and plugins are available in Debian's apt archive.

    Check out how-tos on the subject here, here, and here.

    It took a little effort to get all of this working, but a little effort went a long way. I was basically able to duplicate the RaQ's functionality on a Debian system that I had full control over as far as software updates, kernel and hardware.

    To top it all off, I replicated the config and used Heartbeat to make this into a high availability pair.

  4. ISP Solutions by Lando · · Score: 4, Informative

    Working with a number of ISP's, ie running one myself in the past. I would recommend going with C-panel... The system works well and is updated quite often.

    Rolling your own distribution and keeping apache/postfix/frontpage extentions/webmin/etc up to date takes more time than it's worth and eats your profit margin up.

    Depending on the space you have available, I would go with some 1u or 2u units. Frankly with 150 domains you can probably run all of them on 1-2 systems with decent hardware.

    I strongly recommend against plesk, as they have a number of issues or have had in the past.

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  5. Re:webmin by oneishy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I currently use both webmin, and a cobalt cube (on different servers).

    Webmin is really good for the system admin stuff, and setting up new users etc... It also has good support for just about any version of linux, and application (ftp, apache, sendmail, qmail, etc...). I would not recommend using it for end user configuration as it grants a little to much power, and is geared towards the knowledgeable. It is however reliable and secure.

    For the end user, there is an addon to webmin called Usermin and another titled Virtualmin. The first is geared towards the end user that needs to read email and such (although it is a poor webmail interface for the end user), and the second is geared towards your setting of end users creating and setting up email accts etc.

    hopefully that helps... as it is what i will probably switch to when my cobalt cube dies.

  6. ISPMan? by Rheingold · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've never used the RaQs, but I run my ISP using ISPMan. It's a pretty good system that uses the components I like: Postfix, Cyrus, Apache, Pure-FTPD and LDAP.

    --
    Wil
    wiki