Slashdot Mirror


Study on the Effects of Spam on End Users

An anonymous reader writes "'About a third of people responded to a spam, seeking more information. And 7 percent actually bought a product or service.' Who are these people? Is this really what non-techies do with Spam? They can have my Spam if they want it :-)"

10 of 448 comments (clear)

  1. I've yet to meet by andih8u · · Score: 5, Funny

    an intelligent person who bought something off a spam. These are the same people who are getting herbal viagra while dreaming of a larger penis while writing up their resignation since they'll get so much money from that nice Nigerian man.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  2. I'll tell you who they are. by winkydink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're your friends, family and/or neighbors. In short, they are people who view a computer as merely a tool, not a hobby or profession. It would be interesting to run this every year and study trends. I expect that Joe & Mary Sixpack are becoming more aware of spam very quickly.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  3. spamassassin.org by mirko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My provider just installed it.
    Now, the spam comes with a modified subject (beginning with *****SPAM*****) and a report such as :
    SPAM: . : . . : . : . . Start SpamAssassin results . : . . : . : . .
    SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
    SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
    SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
    SPAM:
    SPAM: Content analysis details: (6.4 hits, 3 required)
    SPAM: Hit! (2.7 points) Subject contains lots of white space
    SPAM: Hit! (3.7 points) BODY: Information on getting a larger penis
    SPAM:
    SPAM: . : . . : . : . . End of SpamAssassin results . : . . : . : . .


    Now, I'd suggest you ask your provider to install such a filter on his servers.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  4. Responses to Spam by soluzar22 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've got my Dad well trained... he usually blocks anything that's not from a user in his address book, and deletes anything with an attatchment that he was not expecting. He's not exactly a techie, but he's a lot more savvy than a lot of non-technical internet users


    My mom on the other hand, still seems to believe that it's all personally directed at her, and that she should either respond, get angry/offended/whatever, just as if someone she knew in meatspace said/sent it to her. :-)


    She's learning, now, but quite often she looks at stuff like those banner ads saying "Speed up your internet connection..." or "You have won..." and she's just not worked out yet that it's all lies. The worst are those emails which claim it's a new critical update from Microsoft. It took ages to convince her that Bill's Boys don't send out neccesary updates through email.


    It's the folk who don't have a reality check in the form of a friendly techie around that I'm worried about. If not for me, my folks PC would be riddled with trojans, virii and other malicious software.



    -- Soluzar
  5. Re:One problem... by Vadim+Grinshpun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See, the problem with the 'approve' scheme (at least the simple, naive version that comes to mind) is that instead of being flooded with annoying messages you will get flooded with no-less-annoying and no-less-intrusive requests for approval/authorization, still creating a DOS-like situation due to the low SNR...

    So that won't necessarily ease the problem.

  6. Re:with a sample size that small by alexre1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unfortunately, most media companies don't care about the statistical validity of their surveys; they only care about how interesting the survey will seem to their readers. One of the newspapers in my city (Toronto) ran a huge university ranking story last week, based on student reviews. The funny thing was that two of the universities in the top-10 ranking for medical schools didn't actually HAVE medical schools.

    Awhell :) What can you do. Aside from complaining on Slashdot, of course.

  7. Re:My coworker has done it by m00nun1t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't confuse intelligence with knowledge.

    I'm sure a few very intelligent /.'ers have had some mechanic laugh at them behind their back - "can you believe they agreed to pay an extra $200 to have their air filter replaced? They can't be very intelligent".

    Just because you know nothing about how much an airfilter costs doesn't mean you are stupid, and likewise with photoshop.

  8. Phone Survay ! by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 5, Insightful


    The report is based on a randomized, national phone survey of 2,200 adults.

    Now, I wonder why a survay carried out in this manner recorded an unusually high number of people responding to spam?

    Maybe a truer responce would have been acheved if every time someone told them to fuck off and slammed the phone down they treated this as an 'I dont respond to spam' reply

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  9. Unenforcable, Political by goldspider · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Exactly how would such a law be enforced? It's not as if these companies sending all this SPAM readily identify themselves. And what about SPAM originating from outside of the U.S.?

    I see this as more toothless-tiger feel-good legislation that politicians sign to get votes. I for one don't buy it for a second.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  10. Re:One problem... by CelloJake · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, at first the approval system would suffer from DOS like problems. But once 99.999% of spam never reaches the end user, there is less incentive to send it.

    The problem will be if a large group of people still accept and read spam. The only way to stop spam will be if A) people do not buy the shit they sell or buy into the scams they offer, or B) spam is controlled by methods outside of the end users hand.

    I still think this will not be a legislative solution. I really think that a large majority of mail hosts should implement white listing, at least for messages that are sent to multiple recipients. If multiple similar messages are received by a mail host from the same or similar mail host(s) then they should be blocked. If a user wishes to be part of a legitimate mail list then there should be a way to authorize that host to send messages. Sure, it will be a pain for some mail lists but utilities will pop up to make it easier for them to do the authorization dance.

    If the top 5 mail hosts would participate, spammers would be obsolete.

    Some people would argue that blocking unauthorized messages would prevent some people from receiving mail that they would like to receive. But companies that send mail to so many people obviously are being harmful to more people than they are providing a service to. (If you call con-ing people into buying useless crap a service, even to people who fall for it.)

    -Jacob